TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

masterofthehaus Archive

View 2 posts and 119 comments by masterofthehaus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh definitely, like I said it should apply to stuff that might pose an actual danger.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 01:42 PM
1

Again, I agree for the average person but I said high profile people. I don't think you can just not be on the internet if it's part of your job, etc.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 07:21 PM
1

I agree there, but I think it's worth it to think about how to update harassment laws to apply to new online threats/settings.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:21 PM
5

I wouldn't say no one is any actual danger from online harassment. For the most part, yeah, it's just trolls, but for high profile people doxxing is a big issue. But yeah, doxxing and threats/harassment online should be taken seriously regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:26 PM
2

Meh, she carried the baby inside her for 40 weeks and then went through labor, she might want first dibs on the holding.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 09:09 PM
9

Ugh, disgusting. Maybe I'm naive but I just don't believe most people would support this kind of thinking.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 09:00 PM
2

That's a possible usage of the saying, but the examples I looked at were using it for actual actions. Maybe we're just interpreting it differently. My understanding is that it's a response to an action, but the idea is that the behind the action are the thoughts/intentions/attitudes, etc. Like looking at a woman's breast, maybe you're a doctor and see a weird mole and the woman yells at you for staring at her cleavage. She's responding to an action, but it's the assumption of behavior/intent/tho…
/r/MensRights13/09/16 08:27 PM
-6

That's a really stupid analogy, and this is part of the reason why MRAs get such bad press from people. You're arguing that a woman's career aspirations are akin to someone on a pleasure cruise wanting a seat on a lifeboat while other people are drowning. That's pretty absurd. War is a horrible thing, but horrible shit happens every day and the world doesn't stop. We can't blame women or people of privilege for pursuing their life goals while other people are suffering. Was every woman in Americ…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:10 PM
1

Yeah, for sure, she should be advocating to end the draft
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:04 PM
-1

Right, I mean obviously it needs to be repealed or women need to be included; but again, it's a shitty argument to say that any one woman "taking your spot" in a school will = your death.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:04 PM
1

Source for that? that's nuts if true
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:39 PM
2

Agreed, but it happened in the past. Have you talked to your parents about it and how you feel? They probably just went along with what the doctor said and didn't know how to advocate for you or themselves. It really sucks and you're allowed to be angry, but maybe you can express that to them and turn them into allies for you. Maybe they can convince other younger parents not to do that, given the way their son felt about it.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:56 PM
2

Yeah, I would say he should talk to them about it. If they can't see why he's upset and why it was wrong, then maybe it's time to cut ties.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:54 PM
1

Yeah, I mean it's not like we're seeing people in the street, behind dumpsters, raping people. Rape happens a lot, to both men and women. I don't know why people want to focus a lot on reducing the numbers for women, instead of reaching out to men and acknowledging their pain/experiences too.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:52 PM
1

Technically assault, not rape though
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:50 PM
2

Pretty good logical breakdown, but there are a few flaws there. You're saying that if "homophobia" is wrong, then so is the discomfort women feel when being "mistreated" by men. But that's a false equivocation of the argument. The argument arises from the concept that the objectification of a person into a sexual object is wrong and dehumanizing; not that being attracted to someone is wrong and dehumanizing. In this argument, attraction to someone is fine, it's the actions and mental attitudes t…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:48 PM
0

I get this, I do, but it's actually a really shitty thing for that guy to say. I mean if he got a spot in the law school, that causes the exact same problem for someone else. The problem wasn't women taking men's spots in law schools/universities during the war, the problem was the fucking war and the fucking draft to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:40 PM
4

Right? That's not how that works...
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:35 PM
6

You know that shit doesn't work if she's already pregnant? Also you could go to jail for poisoning someone. How about don't finish inside anyone who isn't on birth control if you don't want to deal with a kid?
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 08:10 PM
22

That's pretty fucked up. But you're probably lying since you can take the morning after pill as often as you need it. You just shouldn't be fucking taking it that often because you should use some other form of birth control.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 08:09 PM
1

I'm wondering how old this kid is. If he's young enough maybe he can still learn to grow the fuck up and take some responsibility.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 07:52 PM
18

Focus your rhetoric on men's issues, not on refuting/antagonizing feminists. You will both be more productive as an activist this way, and appear like less of a reactionary. This is the most important thing, I think. Not only for a new high school group, but in the movement in general. It's probably the best way to get traction.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:27 PM
2

Tbf, any candidate advocating for more drafting is probably not a politically savvy thing to do. Most progressive politicians would probably be advocating for dismantling the draft, not expending it. It makes sense that in 2008 she was for it, but she needs to give a more progressive line this time.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:24 PM
-4

Oh, I totally agree. I'm just saying that this quote is not saying that men who die are less victims, it's more saying that the long-term cost of war is carried by women who have to deal with the after affects. Again, I'm not even arguing that's true, I just don't like it when people take quotes out of context and don't delve into what was actually said. I think there's plenty in the full quote to argue against, but it's a different conversation than the one the partial quote paints.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:38 PM
1

If you can prove the false claim, then sure. But it's difficult to prove and usually you just have a victim retracting their statement. The problem with that is, sometimes people (men and women) are coerced into retracting statements.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:24 PM
1

Sure, but let's not pretend that better communication from police about the investigation wouldn't have helped (and I mean that across all investigations of all kinds--police should keep people informed of all updates).
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:21 PM
1

Prisons. Do some research on resources available to men in prisons.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:19 PM
1

So this is a really good summary of why the #notallmen stuff is so frustrating. Basically people know that not all men are rapists or jerks, but lots of women have experienced rape or sexual harassment. A way more helpful conversation would be to just acknowledge that, and then also talk about the harassment and assault that men experience. If you get into a shouting match about #NOTALLMEN #YESALLWOMEN you completely forget to talk about male victims of assault and how we can work to help them.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:18 PM
1

Pretty sure the standard is half the length of the marriage - might be a little different if you're nearing retirement. *Edited to add that apparently the half the length of marriage is usually for marriages under 10 years. Judges get to determine for longer marriages. No idea how common/rare longer term alimony is
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:10 PM
1

Interesting, so you have kids? Do you have contact with them?
/r/TheRedPill07/12/15 09:06 PM
1

Well IVF is expensive, but artifical insemination can cost nothing. The basic procedure just requires some sperm and a turkey baster. OP said it wasn't in English, maybe he mistranslated artificial insemination to IVF?
/r/TheRedPill07/12/15 08:56 PM
0

IDK, I mean most women feel a biological imperative to reproduce, right? So if the technology exists and she's coming up on her biological clock is ticking, why should she waste time trying to find a partner? I guess I just don't see the issue.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/15 08:54 PM
-3

I'm not really a fan, but to be fair, you're taking that Hillary quote out of context. She's talking about women in conflict zones, and how they are primarily the refugees fleeing with young children, etc. Not saying that you can really equate one kind of victimizations to another, but there is some context missing from that.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:45 PM
0

Sounds like you should try meditation, or some other way to deal with your anger.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 07:42 PM
9

Cool, thanks for the advice u/cuntymcfagnuts69
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 07:10 PM
0

Could also be a social factor to it; like there's definitely a social belief that men will cheat (don't know how true it is, but it is a perception), so maybe women sort of think that at some point they might come up agains that and are less upset about it compared to emotional cheating?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:18 PM
1

Except that if we had shit like paternity leave and more affording child care, the gap might disappear entirely.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:13 PM
2

That's a fucked up argument. Our society's family groupings encourage both parents to care for the kids, why are you assuming mothers will definitely chose child-rearing over careers, or fathers will choose work over children? That's literally just some outdated bullshit. I thought MRAs want to change things so that we have the freedom to stay home and raise ours kids without facing backlash calling us lazy, incompetent, or pedophiles. Why the fuck are just throwing that out the window? Paternit…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:12 PM
0

Well, I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I don't really troll around on mommy-blogs to try and find stupid shit to make fun of though.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:06 PM
1

I actually like pink and think it's time to reclaim it. Pretty recently it was a color associated with boys, you know: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/when-did-girls-start-wearing-pink-1370097/?no-ist
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 06:45 PM
1

Unfortunately you concur with me?
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 04:59 PM
3

Thank you, I feel like so many people act so thick about this. As a married couple people often make a choice about who works more, who takes care of the kids, and plan for their future as a couple. Like you said, division of marital property is fair and makes sense.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:08 PM
1

I've never seen a feminist argue that. I've seen them argue men aren't socially encouraged to do this stuff, but not argue that men are incompetent at it
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:03 PM
4

Yeah, seems like a cut and dry case of self defense.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:59 PM
0

What he's saying is a good way to keep yourself away from women, and if that's what you want, then cool. But if you're actually interested in progressing men's rights forward then you can talk to your representatives about things like prison reform, or paternity leave. You can also donate to different organizations to help establish shelters for men fleeing abusive situations, or donate to scholarships geared toward underprivileged young men.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:33 PM
2

We should also put pressure on our politicians for prison reform.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:31 PM
1

Okay, sorry, I was just being light and hoping to start a conversation in the comments.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:27 PM
2

For real though, prison reform. We need it.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:20 PM
57

Actually only about 8% of their proceeds go to cancer research, the rest is a cash cow for the NFL. So all that pink on the field is actually about putting green in the league's hands.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 08:19 PM
1

Well it's true I was extrapolating from your statement a bit, but you have to admit that's exactly what it sounds like you're saying. You're responding to someone who said Stop trying to blame his actions on other people. and you came back saying something to the effect of, "Let's not pretend there isn't blame to go around."
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 07:37 PM
0

That's bullshit. You could trace an action anyone did to society and then absolve that person of their wrongs by blaming society. Of course society is fucked up. Of course it makes people feel bad, or makes them feels entitled to something they aren't and that fucks with them. That doesn't mean he wasn't a sick fuck or that it excuses his sickness in any way.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 05:25 PM
1

That's just as weird and wrong as saying this dude did it because he couldn't get laid. He did this because he was fucked up person.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 05:18 PM
4

But part of the problem with the dangerous neighborhood example is that some people live in dangerous neighborhoods, and maybe they work at night. So it's weird to blame someone for putting themselves in a "dangerous situation" when really they may not have a choice about their neighborhood or shift hours.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:26 PM
1

My bad, I forgot that most men's rights activists don't actually give a shit about black men. And apparently my diction is too effeminate for you.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 12:13 PM
–

Also, I'm not looking for a "return" to normalcy or the status quo. I'm looking forward to a time when men, and yeah black men, aren't judged for being at a park with their kids, aren't imprisoned in a system that employs rape daily, have shelters and support services for them. If you're looking for a "return" that tells me you don't care about making progress in any of those areas and instead just want freedom to say shit without the PC police jumping down your throat. Not why I'm in the moveme…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:44 PM
1

First off, I didn't call anyone racist. Secondly, I'm not demanding anything, I'm asking for some common courtesy. And finally, and I hope you guys can understand this, black men in this country need progress in men's rights even more than white guys. We're more likely to go to prison, more likely to have negative male stereotypes employed against us, more likely to lose custody of our children. So it'd be nice if men claiming to care about advancing men's rights didn't drop n-bombs and then act…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:39 PM
–

Still pretty different from actually being a black guy though.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 10:33 PM
-1

I'm sorry, but this video is annoying as shit. This guy is whiney and sarcastic and instead of explaining or describing any actual issues for men, he just reads the article in an annoying voice and makes sarcastic comments. Why don't you try to form an actual argument.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 10:29 PM
3

Totally agree
/r/MensRights05/09/15 10:18 PM
-2

Enough with your shit, we're not talking about the etymology of the roots of the word, it's about the historical context - and the historical context is that it's a derogatory word. So if you want I'll rephrase and say that originally in America it was used to denote black people as subhuman. So please stop with your bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:16 PM
-2

Dude, I fucking know where the word came from
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:58 PM
-3

The word fuck doesn't have the same context as the n-word, which is a word originally used to denote black people as subhuman. And the word is still used for that today. Like I said, this page is supposed to be a safe space for men, so maybe let's shut up the fuck up with that.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:33 PM
–

Are you a fucking moron, or do you actually believe that physical pain is the only way to hurt someone?
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:24 PM
–

Yeah you're right, there's no way for words like that to be hurtful toward anyone.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:21 PM
–

Either way, I don't want to fucking see this word in a subreddit that's suppose to be a safe space for men.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:14 PM
1

Well to be fair, abortion is a different thing entirely, it's not about stopping future procreation it's about stopping a current development happening inside her body. And it does seem like spousal consent for having tubes tied is a thing too.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:13 PM
–

I feel like it would have been a nice sentiment from a kid without a father to his/her single mom on Father's Day, but sending out this message far and wide is a bit crazy.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:07 PM
–

Woah, dude, what the hell? I visit this sub to learn/read about men's rights issues not see racial slurs thrown around all "ironically." Not cool.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:03 PM
1

I don't know, I do think it's a bit on the common side, though I can't really speak for motivations. I've definitely known guys who are assholes and who don't back off or leave a girl alone when she's not interested unless/until she drops the "I have a girlfriend" line.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:00 PM
-1

I don't get what you're saying. You don't patronize anywhere that what, offers gender discriminatory discounts (lady's night, etc.)? Or that you don't patronize anywhere that...what?
/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:57 PM
1

Obviously there are higher instances across racial and socio-economic lines. I don't know what your race or class is, but if you and or your friends are white and upper-middle/upper class, you're not as likely to be arrested.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:52 PM
1

Ahh, I didn't realize that. I thought she delted b/c of the down votes.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:57 PM
1

I hear you, I guess I just don't truck with that whole, "they would do worse" attitude. I suppose I just expect us to be a little better is all. I do get it, though.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:56 PM
-5

I feel like MRAs and feminists have a similar cultural perception where the bottom of the barrel, worst of the worst is held up as a straw man and most moderate, more reasonable views and people are ignored.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:53 PM
1

What the shit is happening to that guy's eye?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:51 PM
2

I didn't see anything to inflammatory, it looked like she was stating opinions that could have been addressed in comments. If she was being totally abusive or insulting, sure, but she was just stating her beliefs and opinions. We could have had the curtsey to engage her in conversation (some people did). No one had to upvote her, but it just seems odd to down vote someone and try to hide their comments instead of starting a discussion.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:49 PM
4

Here you are: http://www.xojane.com/entertainment/im-glad-kermit-and-miss-piggy-broke-up
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:40 PM
4

Right? That's absurd. American men have a 52% chance of being arrested in their lifetime.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:37 PM
5

Very few men are ever going to be arrested Wrong: http://blogs.wsj.com/numbers/how-many-american-men-will-be-arrested-in-their-lifetimes-842/ American men have a 52% chance of being arrested at some point in their life.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:36 PM
0

I don't understand why she was down voted to oblivion. Sure, people disagree, but she was contributing to the conversation. Instead of engaging her, everyone just shut her down.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:33 PM
–

Well, those people are clearly fucked up, because that's a disgusting and terrible violation. IDK what the laws in Sweden are but at least now in many places that's (thankfully) illegal. I don't really understand why no one did report it.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:07 PM
1

This is a hilarious article, what's it got to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/09/15 07:41 PM
1

This was what I found after a quick search: http://singleparents.about.com/od/childcustodylaws/a/michigan_child_custody_laws.htm
/r/MensRights03/09/15 05:18 PM
-2

I am in way denying health care coverage has a problem with gender discrimination. What I'm saying is that law suits like that look and sound fucking ridiculous unless they are actively trying to address those problems.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:10 PM
–

Where is the context for that? I have never heard of someone (of any gender) posting revenge porn pictures of a guy and having society laugh at him.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:03 PM
9

I'm just saying revenge porn is always disgusting and a major violation. You just assumed that there was an attitude of levity because the revenge porn pics were of a man. Not true in this case, and it undermines the conversation.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:55 PM
8

I absolutely agree. Not to mention, they were nude pictures of her girlfriend, not a man, so people can stop with the whole, pics to embarrass a guy are taken less seriously than pics to embarrass a woman.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:49 PM
24

You clearly didn't read the source article - she was gay and posted pics of her ex-girlfriend, not a guy. It's disgusting and no one claimed it was empowering.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:48 PM
-3

I don't know, I feel like unless this law suit is specifically trying to raise awareness or funding for screening for male breast cancer then it's just ridiculous. It seriously undermines important things men are working toward and makes us all look like petulant children.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:34 PM
-2

Am I the only one who thinks that suing a team for handing out Mammogram-related stuff to women only on Mother's Day is just fucking ridiculous and makes the cause look petty and absurd?
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:48 PM
1

Based on a quick search it looks like in Michigan the court will grant a modification in custody if circumstances have changed. If it's come to light that she has mental illness, or her financial situation has deteriorated you can definitely petition the court. This is your kid we're talking about, definitely fight for what's best. Especially if you can show that having full custody means that the child support you're paying will be put to better use.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:37 PM
3

I'm just trying to let you know that this post doesn't have enough variety or sources to be a persuasive argument.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 03:25 PM
7

This needs to be better formatted, also you're harping too much on single points. You point out one single example of each thing and expect that to make your argument. Make a briefer list of different things (not just one point for each of your qualifiers) and back that list up with stats. Also, can you provide a source for the 1-in-54 number? I'm just saying that no one will bother read this, let alone be convinced by it, unless you're a bit more concise, have a bit more substance, and show tha…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:30 PM
2

Why did you agree to Monday - Wednesday? Sounds like you easily could have gotten full custody if she doesn't work and has mental health issues. Why not try to sue now for full custody?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:25 PM
2

That's actually a good point, but I think the answer to have a few single-stall bathrooms and have the rest be gender neutral.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 12:17 PM
3

If you want to talk about safety and vulnerability , why don't you go ahead and show me the statistics of how trans people are constantly attacking and murdering people in bathrooms. Oh wait, that's not something that really happens? Okay, cool.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 12:15 PM
–

Bullshit. In your own home you don't have to let anyone use your bathroom you don't want to. If you're out in public you're not entitled to any kind of standard for who's allowed in the public bathrooms.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:48 PM
3

Not to mention there are issues when there aren't changing tables in men's rooms.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:47 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 10:16 PM
1

I'm not too clear on the laws around common law marriage. Like, is are common law partners entitled to half each other's shit even if neither signed anything?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:42 PM
-10

I think most people don't go into a marriage thinking about the legal disputes that might arise. Not saying you shouldn't consider them a little - but I think if you love and trust someone and decide to commit to each other in a more "traditional" way, then go for it.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:18 PM
-1

I don't understand...is this trolling? If you'd really like to learn more about trans issues, let me know. My cousin is transitioning (male to female).
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:16 PM
-10

Wowzers, comparing "whatever kind of commitment makes sense to the both of you" to a loaded gun? Marriage is definitely not a great institution and it's a 3-way with the state, but I think you have some serrrious trust issues.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:13 PM
6

Sorry, I meant to indicate that parental leave should be offered by all employers. For both men and women. It just seems to me that there would be less strain on social systems if employers offered leave.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:11 PM
1

I guess I'm wondering if less people would take 10 years off to raise kids if they could have affordable childcare, and thereby greatly reducing the wage gap.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:07 PM
1

I just learned that US doesn’t have maternity leave. Of course that creates a gap…if there was maternity leave subsidized childcare, wouldn’t the gap mostly disappear?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:37 PM
1

Really? That's insane. No wonder there's such an issue with child support. Why not create a system that supports women who might be raising a child by herself?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:18 PM
66

Or, you know, have a fulfilling relationship with a loving partner who views you as an equal human being and make whatever kind of commitment makes sense to the both of you...
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:16 PM
3

And to be a black male? Forget about it.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:41 PM
2

Yeah I get really pissed off when "war on men" focuses on white men only. Um....if you can focus on other races for like one second there's a lot more to talk about...
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:40 PM
2

Wait, is that true that the US didn't have mandated maternity leave? I thought that was a standard benefit?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:39 PM
0

Yeah, I mean objectification and harassment is a huge issue. No one should ever have to face that, especially if it involves physical contact. But in response to her question about why it’s more tolerated toward men than women, that’s easy enough. Historically men were sexually objectified, and any sort of objectification that does occur is to hyper-masculize (is that a word?) and make them more powerful. Now, I’m not saying that it’s right or okay, but it’s a somewhat different sort of objectif…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:26 PM
2

Yeah, the grammar in that sign is all over the place, I wonder what the author's command of English is. I guess the only way to know for sure would be for a guy to go in and inquire if they're hiring experienced male waitstaff or just ladies. Then you call the person on their discrimination or you get them to realize they used the wrong word.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:16 PM
2

Maybe I just don't understand the issue, but this actually seems like a nice poster. I think a lot of kids tend to look up to adults of their own gender for cues. Doesn't it make sense to target men to teach boys and target women to teach girls? I mean, not to enforce it or anything, but just a reminder that you're setting an example sort of thing.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:12 PM
1

So this was just my answer to the question of what are some common goals the two movements could share. These are the things I think the two movements could work on together. Also, I agree completely that we need feminists and men's rights activits to move toward gender egalitarianism, especially if we ever want to accomplish the same goals. But I DISAGREE that they should change their title from feminist to humanist, or whatever. A) labels are just labels and what's more important is the conten…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:34 PM
0

Right, the question was something along the lines of what are some common goals we could work toward together - this was my list.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:29 PM
0

Maybe I’m naïve, but I think there’s lots of common goals. Gender equality, first and foremost. Ending sexual violence in prisons, military, war-zones, schools. Ending gender roles (or, at least, stopping the system from rewarding gender roles with flawed systems of child support, etc.). Providing shelters, assistance and job trainings to survivors of abuse (at the hands of parents, spouses, etc.). Addressing the education gap. Addressing the gender and racial basis in criminal justice. Aren’t t…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:44 PM
9

Although I agree, I don't think this is the way to make this argument. People need to understand that circumcision is genital mutilation and it's wrong. It doesn't matter if there were 0 deaths a year as a result, it's wrong to permanently alter someone's body without their consent.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:03 PM
23

Big time. So insane how much rape is denied if it doesn't fit a stupid, narrow definition (which, btw, leaves out most of the victims).
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter