TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

matthew_lane Archive

View 7 posts and 652 comments by matthew_lane on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Family law isn't contract law No one as much as suggested it was. Instead the family court judge will decide who is most fit to be a parent. Cutting power off on your child doesn't earn brownie points. He didn't cut the power off to his child. He cancelled his contract with the utilities, at which point his soon to be ex-wife would have received the termination notification & would have had so long to get her own contract with them. Utilities don't just stop when you cancel your contract, so the…
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:36 AM
1

The OP reads as if the guy canceled his shit in advance In advance of what? Catching his wife in bed with someone else? Jesus dude, you seriously have no clue about what's going on do you. You are just like a drowning man flailing impotently hoping to find something to cling to as you go under for the third time. And so with that, you are just done here, you've been blocked mate. But don't worry, I'm sure you'll find an imaginary hypothetical judge to imaginarily scowl in an imagined disapprovin…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 08:48 AM
1

None of this is relevant to what I said, which is that any family court judge will destroy you for that sort of behavior. No they really won't, the judge will say to her "why didn't you get your own contract with the service providers." Please point me to where I said a phone provider wouldn't oblige? Sure, as soon as you point to where I said you said anything to do with a phone company obliging. You are shadow boxing with the voices in your head mate. If you give proper notice to your wife so …
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:46 AM
1

Cut off power to a 2 yr old child in the care of a mother and see what a judge does to you. Nothing, because the contract is between the signatory & the service provider. A judge cannot over rule a contract unless the contract is illegal, which closing a contract is not. Now If said soon to be ex-wife wants to get her own contract with the service provider once he's ended his contract with them, then she is more than capable of doing so. You might have the right to cut them but the judge has a r…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:59 AM
2

You're a fucking idiot if you think that's how it works in a marriage in US/UK. Oh I don't THINK that's how it works, I KNOW that's how it works, because that is objectively how it works. See those are legal contracts between the person on the contract & the service provider. No third party not mentioned in that contract has any say in the execution of that contract, no, not even a court of law.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:51 AM
60

utting the wife's phone and utilities will get you ruthlessly lambasted by any judge in court No it won't, because he hasn't cut his wife's phone or utilities, he has cut HIS phone & utilities, as those are solely in his name & as such he has every right to cut them.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 10:37 AM
181

The biggest mistake I see men making when it comes to divorce or dealing with women in general is losing their temper. No, the biggest mistake men make is assuming that either the woman you once loved, or the legal system are going to play fair. When you get divorced guys, you better be willing to practice the military art of Rapid Dominance, because you aren't fighting on an even footing, you are fighting a war of asymmetrical warfare. And for those of you who are unfamiliar with the term Rapid…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 07:45 AM
1

A feminist subreddit about liberating men from the shackles of their toxic masculinity So it's a feminism sub reddit.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 10:57 AM
6

Having worked in companies that were predominately male & others that were predominately female I can say this: 99% of all problems women have in the work place (and outside of it) are self generated and or imaginary.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:45 AM
22

Steve Jobs would agree Really? I heard he preferred apples.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 04:31 PM
2

Why are her panties on ? Hmmmmm, maybe those are magic Mormon panties. You know, the ones that make you immune to all damage & she's just practicing safe sex..... REALLLY safe sex.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 05:38 AM
3

I'm guessing that in her mind her two-year graduate degree trumps his doctorate in medicine. Hmmmm, it's less that she thinks having a two year graduate degree trumps his doctorate as much as she thinks having a vagina trumps everything.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 11:41 AM
1

Maybe she should have learned how to use astrology, Nahhh, she's going to learn Phrenology next.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:05 AM
4

Unless she is practicing homeopathy also via illegal means. Man, I've been practicing homeopathy without a degree for years. why just this morning I turned on the tap & got my self a glass of water.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:38 PM
12

probably not educated. Oh play fair, she was educated, she had an education in homeopathy. "Hey y'all, water is a magical panacea" Hey, will you look at that, now you have the same qualifications in homeopathy that she has. Now lets celebrate your successfully passing of this extensive homeopathy degree by going out for a drink. Maybe a tall glass of water.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:35 PM
18

What about the REGULAR FUCKING MEN IT IS DISCRIMINATING AGAINST! What about them, they should have chosen to be women: Clearly they just didn't want it enough. /s
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:04 PM
20

Lol.. the school is blaming the boys for it.. these people are fucking brilliant. I know right: She makes stupid statements, the boys rebut her stupid positions, she throws a wobblier & refuses to answer questions from boys on the basis that they are boys. Who's to blame? Why the boys are to blame for having the temerity to show up to school while male.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 10:21 AM
24

They don't stay long. The education system is so feminised they soon quit. And those who don't quit live under a perpetual cloud of suspicion that they are secretly sexual predators.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:51 PM
3

"World ends in meteorite strike, women most affected."
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:36 AM
31

"It's a shame men aim for the younger age range because women of 45 and 55 are arguably much more sexually mature and able to give a lot more pleasure than, say, a woman of 25." LOL spoken like a 45 t o55 year old woman who road the cock carousel in her 20's thinking the ride would never end & realizes that the cock carousel has a sign next to it they missed declaring "you must be this young to ride."
/r/MensRights23/07/17 11:36 AM
154

Universities: "PLEASE! For the love of god, Join a STEM program! We are desperate for female STEM grads!" University Feminist Group: There aren't enough women in STEM programs, so you should join a 4 years womens studies class so we can tell you all about how it's patriarchies fault.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:10 AM
4

Disclaimer: I haven't kept track of the Cosby situation, nor do I care about the outcome one way or the other. Well you should because that shit was hilarious. 5 days the prosecution took laying out all the elements of it's case, and all it took for the defence to get a mistrial was six minutes and a single witness.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 12:23 PM
6

Actually no, Cavil made roughly the same thing Gadot did, the rest of the $14m was from appearance fees & other associated bits and pieces, something that Gadot will probably end up making MORE than he did, considering her movie was a major success, while his was not.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:11 AM
2

I see nothing wrong with this image. Clearly that man had a spider on his head & his wife caught it one handed.... Everyone deserves a wife willing to catch errant head spiders. /s
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:53 AM
2

So you're telling me, the women who wanted to vote, the women who wanted to work, just wanted special priveleges? No because again you are conflating women with feminists. What I'm telling you is that the feminists fought for rights, absent their social obligation. For example the right to vote, without the obligation to serve, something which resulted in some of the earliest suffragists metamorphosing overnight into white feather brigade the second the great war was announced. Poof gone were th…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:21 AM
2

The women you speak of are not feminists. They are simply sexists under the facade of feminism,because it gives them a sort of shield. Arrr yes, the classic no true feminist defense: The defense that gets trotted out whenever people point out the things that feminists have done in the name of feminism. If all the feminists who are not true feminists would disappear there would be no such thing as feminism because feminism has never been about equality, it was always about special interest. You a…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 10:52 PM
4

You shouldn't discard the social and economic benefits that some women have introduced to our ever changing society. You seem to be conflating women to feminists. Women are a group of people identified by biological traits, feminists are a group of people identified by subscribing to an ideology. All women are not feminist & all feminists are not women. Do not conflate the two, they are very different things. As such no one is discarding what WOMEN have done, people are pointing out that FEMINIS…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:43 AM
3

Modern day feminists want equality. They don't, they want special privileges for their in-group. If that were not the case then please feel free to demonstrate it by answering this simple question. Name one real world concrete change made by feminism as an ideology for the specific benefit of men and boys in the first world, towards the outcome of equality.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:45 AM
6

You chose one example and used that to address all feminism to that era. He selected one of MANY. There are any number of those kinds of examples, from the right to work without the obligation to be held responsible for their own taxes, to the right to take out credit in their husband or fathers name without the obligation to ever pay it back, to the right to vote without the obligation of service.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:42 AM
13

Feminists from the early to mid 20th century had some very valid complaints. Today many don't want equality Feminists have never wanted equality, not even in the early to mid 20th century. They wanted rights, disconnected from their related obligations. Right to vote, no obligation to serve. Right to take out credit in your husbands name, no obligation to pay it back. Right to work, no obligation to be held responsible for non payment of taxes, etc, etc.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:30 AM
1

i bet most anyone with an engineering degree would be able to pay off their student loans a lot faster than someone with a liberal arts "degree" for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with what's between their legs. I don't know, I'm pretty sure I could straddle a well paying engineering job, then it would totally be about what's between my legs.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:08 AM
8

How do i go about saying something and possibly convincing this teacher to show the class the documentary, The Red Pill. You'd have a better chance of convincing a creationist in a class teaching creationism to let her class watch a documentary about evolution, followed by watching Jesus Camp.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:40 PM
1

"If a girl tells me to stop, should I?" No, you should continue to force her to ride go-carts around, she doesn't really want you to stop riding go-carts around, she just wants to look like the responsible one.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:25 AM
43

Damn my genetically hard wired preferences! Also that whole "survival of the species" thing.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 06:13 AM
2

They'll ask us to come back out to fix their mess in a real hurry. If you mean that they'd come and complain to us that we were oppressing them by keeping them out of our well regulated & prosperous city inside our walled enclosures then yes, I agree.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:13 PM
4

Even a globally-coordinated attempt by women to #KillAllMen or put us in camps would last about 5 minutes, It wouldn't even last that long, as that would require there to be sufficient camps to keep us all in & whose going to build those? Women?
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:40 AM
6

Did the man turn around and demand his wife get a boob job in response? Seems fair to me, she's getting him to alter his genitalia strictly for aesthetic reasons, he should be able to demand the same from her, right?
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:53 AM
1

Establish programs that encourage men to enter that field like feminists do with STEM subjects and women? Because if they did it would just result in even louder protestations that those men who would go to the effort of becoming teachers are doing so strictly to predate children.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:08 AM
6

also Watch latest episodes on the CW website. yay!!! Well my work here is done. [opens my umbrella & floats away]
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:44 AM
3

Didn't the new season start last week? I'm not sure how long it takes to get to Netflix but if it's the same as normal tv that'd be now.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:29 AM
40

Haha, yep, just look at what subs I mod. I have concluded that you must be a zombie from Seattle that hasn't quite got the hiding your pale complexion thing down yet. Am I close? ;)
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:47 AM
3

Mate she has so many daddy issues, that she has a lifetime subscription to daddy magazine, as well as the collected back issues. That's how many Daddy Issues she has, all of them.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:03 AM
12

I don't 'sperg' over anti-women stuff, How are demonstrable facts anti-woman?
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:06 PM
1

Only way to win is to not play... Nah, even then you lose.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 08:09 AM
1

More like Book Haram.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:17 AM
2

I haven't read her material I have & I found it utterly mediocre.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:25 AM
2

Sorry, I'm going to have to disagree. The only book I've read from her is "How to Build a Girl" & I didn't even get all the way thru it, I found it that stilted & boring.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:25 AM
10

You just compared dead human body to an unborn child lol. No I really didn't. I said a foetus is no more a child than you are a corpse. That's comparing a foetus to a corpse in the same way as saying " Because a pizza is no more a apple than you are a monkey" is comparing pizzas to monkeys, which is to say not comparing them at all. In fact it's specifically stating that they are different things, that are not comparable. So now we've cleared up your inability to comprehend basic English, would …
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:33 AM
6

That's not a rebuttal, I didn't compare a foetus to a corpse. Now would you like to try again, this time focusing on putting an actual rebuttal into your rebuttal?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:06 AM
3

So that's a no on you actually providing any kind of refutation.... I'm going to give you one more chance & then you get relegated to my block list with all the other clowns who can't put forward an actual argument to support their positions.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:58 AM
4

I've already learnt everything I need to know about humans & that's that mass societal damage causes significantly more damage to more people, for a longer amount of time, then it does to a single individual whose parent is the rare individual who does something stupid in the face of overwhelming contrary government policy. But that's not a refutation of the point I made, so would you like another shot to actually offer up a refutation to the points actually made? This time, how about instead of…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:51 AM
7

You're out of your mind if you think making kids suffer because of their parents decisions is a good idea. But it won't make kids suffer since women realizing that they don't have the fiscal backing to raise kids without a partner & lacking the sugar daddy of big government will simply not bring children in to the world that they can't support, hence there will be no kids with which to suffer. See having children is a choice, no one slips & falls into parenthood. If you are a woman, it is your c…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 06:19 AM
7

And then tax payers would be paying for your child If I had my way that'd be removed as well. The only reason fatherless single parent families sky rocketed is because the practice was incentivised by the government becoming womens sugar daddy. Take that away from women who are becoming single mothers by choice (not widows, not divorcees) & watch as the number of fatherless homes plummets.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:58 AM
19

You're talking about a human beings life No we aren't, we are talking about a hypothetical childs potential life. Because a foetus is no more a child than you are a corpse.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:55 AM
5

I think that might be a little overkill, (hopefully) she'll be retiring in a couple years It's not, it's exactly what you should do, regardless of how much longer she plans on working.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:26 AM
8

It's might not be "God I hate black people". Trust me it turns in to "God I hate black people" if you are constantly being scolded at an institutionalised level about how racist you must all be to black people & how much you clearly all hate black people. Eventually you'll end up hating black people, on the basis that if you are going to constantly being told you hate black people it'll causes you to hate them on the basis of constantly being harangued about how much you hate them. And that goes…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 12:24 PM
13

Well sure, they know that if all women didn't show up to work the world would continue on. Likewise they also know if all men didn't show up to work civilization would come to a screeching halt.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 12:10 PM
11

But forcing people to go and be lectured on how racist / sexist they are just elicits a "fuck you" response. Followed by the active hatred of the group of people the talks constantly tell you that you must obviously hate. Real talk here, if you have to sit thru hour long presentations up to 12 times a year telling you how much you hate black people & how you must be constantly on your guard & constantly changing your language so as not to cause offense to black people, the inevitable outcome is …
/r/MensRights26/02/17 12:03 PM
7

(Current Year)
/r/MensRights14/02/17 09:23 AM
8

Just to clarify what you mean by "very popular". Do you mean the one that can't field a professional league... ever? Is that better or worse than the Australian national womens team who got beaten by a group of high schoolers last year?
/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:54 AM
0

It may be immoral to sleep with a student, I think what you mean is "you may consider it immoral" since morality is subjective, but beyond that you are spot on.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 04:40 AM
21

Sue them for gender discrimination. Even better, sue them for special mens hours, in which only men are allowed in the lounge, no women allowed & make sure they are the most desirable hours..... That way it'll be exactly like going to a gym where there are special women only sessions.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:11 AM
1

Being paid to look after a teenager who is at school all day? Man, that's some pretty great work if you can get it.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:54 AM
1

Just imagine if a classmate finds that When, not if.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:25 AM
14

Also where toast is legal.... Just saying, it's pretty suspicious don't you think.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 01:18 AM
3

There is no end of feminist commentary on these issues Sure, but even if they replaced every single person involved with every single medium with a feminist, feminists would still complain without end about the media created.... Because that's what feminists do, their hobby is complaining about things.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 07:50 AM
2

It's kinda hard to pitch an argument when your opponent is refusing to present their position for you to argue against. Except you weren't looking to argue against a position, you were looking to pull the classic "the dictionary says" argument & we all know how that argument goes already.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:31 AM
1

You don't care what I think Oh hun, if I thought for a second you had an original thing to say I'd totally listen, but you don't. Your like a fundamentalist Christian who shows up in an atheist board for the first time ready to wow them & then launch into "pascals wager" & then look shocked when you get stopped before you've even got as far as "but what if you are wrong." We both knew the argument you were going to make because it's from "babies first book of arguing with Anti-Feminists." If you…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:03 AM
2

And I'm going to continue too ignore it because we both know you are going to attempt to employ one of feminists favourite apologetics, in which you pull out a dictionary & read me the dictionary definition of feminism, at which point I have to explain the difference between a descriptive & prescriptive definition to you. So lets not & pretend we did.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:47 AM
2

First off, you seem to have changed your position from "feminism has done no good" to "feminism has done some good, No, I really haven't. You stated it has done MUCH good & I'm telling you it hasn't. The key word their, the qualifier is the word MUCH. To answer your question I'll give you the example of Susan B. Anthony and the Nineteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, popularly known as the Anthony Amendment, which gave women the right to vote. Wasn't achieved by feminists, it was…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:34 AM
3

You're saying that feminism hasn't done good for humanity? I'm confused I know, it is confusing when a group of people constantly mythologise their own history, but the reality is that even if doing good things some how undid the bad things an ideology does the amount of things that could arguably be called good that feminism claims to have done were mostly achieved by other people who had nothing to do with feminism. Lets take your example of suffrage: Suffrage was not achieved by feminism, nor…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 09:26 AM
-1

I could, it would only take a few seconds. With a comment section 1600+ long it would not be hard, Hop to it then. but I'm not going to waste my time. Really? Because according to you it would only take a few seconds, inarguably less time than it would take you to have penned this reply in which you included no citation. Sure, I could copy and paste a few comments but we both already know how this will end. With you not being able to substantiate your claim. What you are attempting to do is 'arg…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:35 AM
2

No, I'm really not & it really isn't & no it really hasn't.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:25 AM
2

Horseshoe theory of politics mate: Just because censorship is the primary tool of social justice, doesn't mean all people who use it are SJW's. Just because all thumbs are fingers, it doesn't then follow that all fingers are thumbs.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:18 AM
6

However, that policy did not work out. We were overrun by anti-feminist users. Feminist mod to English translation: People kept on pointing out we were wrong on things & so we made pointing out we were wrong about things against the rules.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:16 AM
4

There is a lot of woman hating going on in this sub. Citaiton required: Give us a demonstration of all this woman hating. Edit: No that's a downvote, it's like a citation, but minus the citation part of a citation. Try again, but this time include a citation in your citation.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:10 AM
2

Actually it does. fighting for rights necessitates opposing the ideology that teaches bullshit. Allow me to demonstrate, by taking adapting your comment: Scientific study of abiogenesis doesn't necessarily mean opposition to young earth creationism though lol. Even gender egalitarianism is in opposition to feminism, since not only can feminism not reach it's supposed goal of equality, it's actually an active detriment to that goal, as an ideology, so anyone wanting equality must by definition be…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:01 AM
2

The feminist movement was about getting equal treatmeant for men and women when it was first introduced. Nope. Sorry, but that's simply not the case, feminism has NEVER been about equal treatment for men & women, it has always been about getting rights for women, absent the obligations that those rights served. You only need look at the actions taken & the rhetoric spoken by members in the early years to see that. Like how the suffragette movement morphed into the white feather brigade literally…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:52 AM
1

Classic Orwell: "All animals are equal. Some Animals are just more equal than others."
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:43 AM
4

Doesn't matter if it's his opinion or if he's simply echoing someone elses, it's still wrong & my comment demonstrates that the very underlying concept on which the entire concept is built is fatally flawed (the concept of spiritual innocence, which has no place in any secular legal system).
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:22 AM
5

Innocence is still lost. Carnal knowledge is still gained. Etc. There is no such thing as innocence & as such it can no more be lost than someone could steal your Chakras, or assault your auras. By your logic masturbation should now be illegal because a teenager masturbating is adding to their carnal knowledge & steals their "innocence."
/r/MensRights16/12/16 02:05 AM
2

I think you mean theys, remember they is now a singular pronoun.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 01:54 AM
23

There are certain words that should be banned No, there are no words that should be banned, because banning words is what authoritarians do, you know, authoritarians like feminists. If some one wants to say mansplaining they are allowed to and should continue to be allowed to. If someone wants to show their ignorance & stupidity by using such a term then they should have the right to do so, after all you know what they say: There's no disinfectant like sun light.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 05:23 AM
6

She wasn't just attacking me. She was attacking all men. That's because she's a collectivist: In her mind you are a stand in for all men & she is the stand in for all women.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 04:56 AM
17

They do, but I think they call it women studies.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 04:54 AM
2

Nope, she never had a chance to win; she was all the worst aspects of American politics all rolled up into a single person. Her opponent could have been the reincarnation of Hitler, as the Anti-Christ, caught on camera in sexual congress with a barn yard animal, while eating a baby in kitten sauce sammich & he still would have won over Shillary.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:21 AM
2

Let politicians know, Hillary would have won if she addressed Men's rights. No she wouldn't have. This was much bigger than mens rights, she had no chance to win.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:54 PM
1

But what I was referring to was the level of visibility given to these people in the media in aus seems much higher that that of nz. You know what they say: No disinfectant like sun light. I'd much rather they be out in the open, where everyone can see their batshit insanity for what it is, rather than hiding it in private & covertly utilising governmental systems to force their preferences in to the legislature.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 04:26 AM
0

That might have been the most American sentence I've ever seen. If you threw in the words trump, guns & yehaw, it would be the most American sentence it's possible to write.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 02:27 PM
2

Really> Because right now you live in a country where online trolling is illegal.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 02:26 PM
2

I haven't read it, but I find it extremely hypocritical to defend it as "satire", It's not satire. Solanas' really was just a hateful person, to the point that when she died her own parents took everything she owned, placed it all on the front lawn, doused it in accelerant & set it all on fire, according to the history books.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 03:01 AM
7

"Wait a second, since when did obligations come with rights? I thought obligations were only for men. I didn't sign up for social obligations."
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:22 AM
5

That's what people said in 1961 too, guess what happened in 1962.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:21 AM
2

Unless you're actually an attorney. And even then, do not act as your own attorney.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 10:20 AM
3

No, because we aren't discussing the social dynamics of Black America. We are discussing the objectively demonstrably bullshit nature of the foundational claims of BLM. The biggest claim is of course that police shootings of black people are racially motivated. In reality study after study has demonstrated this is just not the case, one such example can be found here. BLM is bullshit, it's pretence of injustice is just an excuse to riot like thugs, it's not any different to the thugs who rioted …
/r/MensRights21/10/16 04:04 AM
1

They are also the greatest benefit, least threat and every other category you could think of. Most likely to make pancakes Least likely to fart after instructing someone to pull your finger
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:02 AM
3

I don't pay attention to a few angry hypocrites that are being exploited to dismiss a real problem in America. You mean the imaginary problem, where they pretend that innocent black people are being hunted by racist white police men, looking to kill themselves a nigger today, because it's a day ending in the letter Y. Hate to break it to you but the basis for BLM is bullshit, if the group actually cared about black lives they wouldn't be marching while chanting "pig's in a blanket it, fry them l…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:59 AM
39

This is the first time I've seen this WHOLE video. Media agencies are cutting out the part where she instigates it by attacking him.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:38 AM
8

You know you are totally fucked when your university has not one, but two "rape crises" centres. Especially when the first one was under utilised to start with.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 12:22 PM
1

So when the hot chick you'v been fucking finds out no, you are not in fact a doctor, you can go to prison for lying to get laid? You didn't read the rest of the message did you. If you had, you'd note this has already been covered. A doctor is WHO you are, not WHAT you are. The hypothetical law only covers WHAT you are, not WHO you are. In fact I flipplantly pointed out this exact scenario in the very comment you just replied to. Allow me to repeat that section for you. It wouldn't cover a guy l…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:53 PM
8

As far as I can see there was only one sex offender in this case & it wasn't this poor sap, he's the victim in this. No the sex offender is the person who knowingly committed a crime. I've been saying for years that there should be sex through fraud laws, in which one can be charged if one has sex under false pretenses of what one is (not to be mistaken for WHO one is). So for example one could be charged with sex under false pretenses for having sex while underage, if one has lied about being o…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 05:28 AM
2

Cults, like say Scientology and feminism, abuse the legal system to protect their beliefs and preachers from accountability and open discourse. So does the Catholic church. This is why their is no functional difference between a religion & a cult except that one sounds worse when said out loud due to negative associations.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:31 AM
7

Jesus this article was so bad it gave me cancer. Firstly that's not how intelligence works, at all. Secondly if this were true as written than women would have exponentially growing intelligence over successive generations, which is clearly not the case. Thirdly, you'll note once again the complete lack of citation to you know, the study that found this thing. It's almost like the article was written specifically fro low intelligence women to feel better about themselves.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:27 AM
14

They are kangaroo courts. They aren't even that. They are more like puritanical era witch hunts, which could be boiled down to "I am jealous of this person, or I find this person to be creepy so they must a wrong thinker & must be killed."
/r/MensRights06/10/16 02:08 AM
1

it would also be "unwanted sexual contact" Nah that's still to judgemental.... How about "Ick feeling touching?"
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:09 AM
4

Meet the community that’s fighting for men’s rights without bashing feminism. Or to put it another way Meet the people in the sinking boat that’s fighting for the boat not to sink without bailing out the water, or stopping up the holes.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 01:50 AM
6

Men are like busses...Under appreciated & vital for the continuation of an orderly society.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 01:46 AM
1

While The Taming of the Shrew remains an old standby plays have been trying to be edgy for longer than most people in this subreddit have been alive. It's almost like theatre has been replaced by some kind of superior art form that is both more compelling & has an easier way to watch.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 02:49 PM
2

I know what you mean.... An what do we type in to get money out of the ATM machine? A PIN number, which we can see being punched in on the LCD display.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 02:44 PM
1

It is about impossible for me to take personal anecdotes as evidence Especially when it's not evidence to the contrary of the position it's being used as a rebuttal for.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 02:02 PM
1

Are those SJW comics? I think you are pretty safe unless All Star Batman is now about a black lesbian of color muslim hemophiliac in a wheel chair, who self identifies as a wolf stuck in a human body & the wolf preferred prefixes are Pow, Thwack & Biff.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 01:15 PM
1

not very bright Yeah we've apparently reached the point in the discussion where they are smart enough to realize they are wrong, but not smart enough to reason a way out of being wrong, so we've reached the feminists favorite stall tactic: "you just couldn't understand." When one refuses to even engage with a Socratic thought experiment that's pretty much an admission that your position is so weak as to not be able to stand up to the most basic level of scrutiny.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 01:13 PM
2

I'm in Australia & this is an Australian page, so I'm using the ABS Personal Safety Survey and Australian Institute of Criminology data. Same outcome, but locally based.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 11:44 AM
1

That is entirely possible.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 09:09 AM
1

Personally I think the enlightenment was already there, they just needed someone to be the first to say them out loud & make it okay for everyone else to say too.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 08:50 AM
1

Here you go. Not only was it a good response it resulted in an interesting intelligent conversation. Which just goes to show that not everyone you meet online is unwilling to have their views questioned.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 07:52 AM
1

Hah! Don't expect a good response mate! Shockingly I actually just got one. I got one of those "holy shit you are right" responses. No one was as shocked as I am.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 07:11 AM
3

Not even the one I'm most proud of. The one I'm most proud of hasn't got a reply yet, but I am hopeful. I had someone call me an idiot, to which my reply was: Great, then you should have no problem refuting my statement. I mean, as an idiot i'm prone to idiocy, that being the primary trait of idiots: So if you could do me a solid & refute my statement & showing me where my statement was in error, i can hopefully cure my self of this idiocy. :) Now that one I'm proud of & hope she answers, as it …
/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:21 AM
2

Usually I don't, but sometimes it's fun to put the fox amongst the pigeons. Plus it gives you a chance to educate rather ignorant people whose idea of rhetorical debate is just calling someone an idiot. I'm actually quite happy with how the discourse is going at the moment, since most of them seem less like feminists & more like people who have been misinformed by feminist bullshit their entire lives & can still be slow walked to rationality if adequately lead by the hand to facts & data.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:18 AM
1

I don't know. What SJW comics are you currently buying?
/r/MensRights18/09/16 04:28 AM
2

It's already occurred. you are late to this party good sir. Marvels already did that with SJW's pumping up Ms Marvel's issue 1 to incredible heights, before abandoning it once it was no longer trendy to pretend to be interested in it.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 04:01 AM
91

Where is the outrage from the feminist community? Don't worry, I'm sure they'll show up to be outraged over this rapey 11 year old who is mature for his age taking advantage of this mentally immature 21 year old woman. /S
/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:14 PM
2

Another lefty here: My job was conceptualizing people who conceptualized math.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:27 AM
4

Maybe you are just count-fused.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:25 AM
2

There is no such thing as centrism, there are positions that appear at a point nearer the center of a scale leading to two extremes.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 06:51 AM
2

Oh you mean "useful idiots." Both sides have those too.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 05:43 AM
9

Yes, there's a reason it's referred to as the Horseshoe theory of politics. The further from the center you get, the more extreme your position gets till eventually the far right & regressive left are practically indistinguishable from each other.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 05:41 AM
6

No it's not. It's the default for extremists, not leftists. both the right & left have extremes & both only function for a small minority of chosen people.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 02:27 AM
2

No it's not. It's the default for extremists, not leftists. both the right & left have extremes & both only function for a small minority of chosen people.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 02:27 AM
83

Step 1, stop treating boys like defective girls & then drugging them to the eye balls with phony a diagnosis o ADD, ADHD, or autism, or what ever the next trendy excuse for female teachers not being able to relate to male students is.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 12:51 PM
2

Yeah I've never understood this logic. Early days of the cons: Hey lets dress as our favorite characters, it'll be a hoot Cons circa late 90's early 2000s: We are attractive women who demand attention, lets dress up as sexy versions of non sexy things & pose for an audience. Cons circa late 200s: We are attractive women who demand attention, lets dress up as slutty versions of non sexy things that other girls are dressing up as sexy versions of, because I demand the most attention Cons now: HOW …
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:30 PM
-1

Can you clarify that I am understanding you correctly? You know, the MGTOW who are the self identifiers who speak on the topic & pretend that by being MGTOW suddenly they have women throwing themselves at them because they went MGTOW & women are now attracted to them like their dick shoots the cure to cancer & 100 dollar bills.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:35 AM
2

I highly doubt that they have the sme backend You are right, I meant bing not google. Yahoo is powered by bing's back end.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:04 AM
12

MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why? MGTOW. I have no problem with the idea of men not wanting anything to do with marriage or even co-habitation, that's a reasonable thing given our current legal atmosphere. No, my problem is with the people who self identify as such like it's their identity, like you some how are special, or deserve an award. Worse yet are the people who pretend like they got special magical powers from doing so, because they are always pretendin…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 06:16 AM
8

Exactly this. I mean Google & yahoo use the same back end, but the amount of times I've had to swap between the two because one isn't giving me the pages I need is pretty common place. Because they have the same algorithm, but it makes allowances for things like location & relevancy to that location. I just typed in the same thing into my google, yahoo & bing & I get different results to the results the OP gets because the algorithm is aware I am in a different location than the OP is.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:15 AM
1

Then why isn't everyone doing that now? Lots of people are doing it now, it's a huge urban problem in western societies all over the planet. This is the same attitude as blaming the poor for a bad economy. No it's not. One does not choose to be poor, one does choose to have children they cannot afford. The poor do not create wide spread economic problem, single mothers do create wide spread social issues. The health, safety, and welfare of the mother and child trump the importance of punishment …
/r/MensRights01/09/16 01:54 AM
4

There is a huge difference between male and female circumcision you know. There's also a huge difference between cutting ones hand of at the wrist, or the elbow, doesn't mean you should be cutting anyones hands off though does it. What you just attempted is called the fallacy of relative privation.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:15 PM
0

Are you assuming that women want to have children just so they can get paid? Nope I think they want children & don't want to work, an if you give people that opportunity they'll take it because it is the path of least resistance. Because putting in the effort to find a partner, have a relationship & then get married after a period of engagement to assure you are compatible is hard. It's much easier to just let the government be your sugar daddy.... All the money & security of a husband, but with…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:10 PM
1

I know that girls get boob jobs if their tits are small, but is there anything I can do for a small dick? You could always get a sex change & aim for lipstick lesbians.
/r/askTRP31/08/16 11:21 AM
3

Womens struggle: Being the number one victim of imaginary microaggressions Mens struggle: Being the number one victim of ACTUAL aggression.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 10:34 AM
0

Your shit is not a living, breathing human child. Neitheri s the hypotethical child you haven't had because you aren't going to get an assured government pay day. and such measures would result in the mother and child living in poverty No my step didn't. That's akin to saying you having laws against me shooting you in the head are wrong because it would result in me living the rest of my life in jail. You are assuming that the choice to do something is mandatory, when it's not. The law would sim…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:36 AM
5

My problem with this attitude is that what you suggest would basically be punishing people for having children, It's not punishing them, it's simply not rewarding them for it. I took a shit this morning, no one rewarded me for it, in your estimation am I being punished for taking a shit by the govenrmnet not paying me to take a shit?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:05 AM
3

Would that woman make that decision if she knew she wasn't guaranteed bank for the next 18 years of her life? I go further than that. I live in Australia, where there is assured government child support. If I had my way the government wouldn't fund children to single women who have children while single by choice. If you got rid of that bank too, suddenly the amount of children born outside of wedlock would plummet.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:27 AM
5

I'd absolutely punch myself for a few million. Pft, I'd hit you for a few million. Heck I'd probably hit you for pocket change & a ham sammich.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 08:07 AM
15

Basically, they are so privileged that they can only complain about not getting the exact benefit they want. Like somebody is given a car and they complain that it doesn't have alloy wheels. Or complaining that this hundred dollar bill has a crease in it. Or complaining that ones 6 bed room beach house with private beach doesn't have 7 bedrooms.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 12:00 PM
2

else you risk eternal damnation. But I don't want to use tumblr forever.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 09:26 AM
31

I got called sweety by the barista the other day & it totally made my day. I don't know why women get so up tight over it.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:56 AM
5

What she was having was a bachelorette party Or alternatively a "Hens Night." Though that might just be the Australian name for it.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 01:02 PM
3

They have to believe it otherwise they'd have to admit they wasted 4 years & thousands of dollars on a useless load of bullshit by studying womens studies.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 01:35 AM
3

No corporate won't give a shit about the legality of the video. It's because they have significantly more to lose than he does if the information goes public.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 07:02 AM
5

If this is a chain store then what you do is you contact corporate about this waste of resources & the sexism of the situation. Corporate doesn't want resources wasted, staff injuries that may result in a workers compensation claim, or a possible lawsuit over discriminatory practices. And if you can find a way to spend 2 or 3 days discretely recording the negative actions that would really help your case. An that goes for a 1 consent of 2 consent state, because corporate won't give a fuck if the…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 05:06 AM
2

Philip Davies tells men’s rights conference that Britain’s legal system is skewed in favour of women In other breaking news, water is wet & fire is hot.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 07:10 AM
5

This is true. Humans are the only mammalian species to have prominent & shapely breast tissue. We are also the only mammalian species to mount from the front. So yes you are right breasts are in fact a sexual organ. But I do love women who claim they aren't because my reply to that is always "great, show us your tits then." After all they can't get offended by me asking to see their tits, after all tits are not a sexual organ, clearly they should have no issue flashing them to me, just as you wo…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:38 PM
4

If Chad is staring there is no issue. Would this be Chad Longdong-McWealthyfamily or the New England Longdong-McWealthyfamily to whom you refer?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:34 PM
11

I don't really think they are to blame for being uncomfortable for being stared at. Of course they are. They are literally the only person who can possibly be responsible for their own mental state. To borrow a line from Hamlet: "for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." I mean I'm sure some men go topless when it's super hot and they aren't asking to be looked at Of course they are, which is why women will ogle a topless guy, as long as he's a physical fit specimen. An…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:31 PM
2

What happened to the woman called Martha was awful Because she was kidnapped by Lex Luthor, or because she appears in Batman v Superman? /jk
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:22 PM
11

Also, I'd like to present my adopted country of New Zealand as the only former colony that isn't going to hell. You are talking about the same New Zealand which just passed laws last year in which you can be sent to jail for two years for knowingly offending someone online. There is no country in the entire western world that isn't being slowly sent to hell by the bigotry of low expectations of SJW's.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:20 PM
15

I'm sorry I couldn't hear you over the sound of your "ongoing enthusiastic consent laws."
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:17 PM
1

"Staring at a womens breasts is not a crime per say, but it is an offense and we will act accordingly" "We'll bitch, moan & complain like it is an offense & we'll scream about how the world is a patriarchy when law enforcement tells us to stop wasting their time with this frivolous nonsense." That wasn't part of the article, but it's what we all know they meant.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:15 PM
6

I once heard a joke from a historian that went like this: In ancient Greece do you know what they used to use to separate the men from the boys? A crowbar.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:06 PM
25

They would but I don't think competitive dog grooming is an Olympic event.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:05 PM
2

Voltaire wrote in French. Doesn't matter what Voltaire wrote in since Voltaire didn't write this quote, we don't know where it came from originally. The fact that someone else said something similar does not mean it came from them.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 09:28 AM
3

Actually no one knows where the quote originally came from. It showed up one day being attributed to Voltaire & since then a lot of people have quoted it. Strom said something similar but different.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 05:49 AM
0

Let's be honest, there is a huge problem of excessive female nudity in the mainstream media. Clearly you and I are looking at very different mainstream media.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:37 AM
6

Super Sayian Nigga.... His Nigga power level is over 9000!
/r/MensRights26/07/16 01:39 PM
1

No details on how this was achieved.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 03:24 AM
1

That's not a skirt, it's a kilt.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 03:20 AM
3

That moment when you realize that Leslie Jones isn't playing an obnoxious loud ignorant black woman cliché, because Leslie Jones IS the obnoxious loud ignorant black woman the cliché is stereotyping.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 12:08 PM
5

Not necessarily. If my computer is plugged into a battery & then into the mains power supply, turning off the power doesn't mean the computer turns off.... But turning off the computer means the computer turns off. An why do I have a battery? So in case of loss of mains power I can safely turn my computer off, to avoid the chance of catastrophic system failure.... You know, like just randomly pulling the plug on a giant ghost containment device.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:32 PM
10

The villain is a female crime lord, Yes, but so is one of the protagonists, so it can't really be a battle of the sexes now can it.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:26 PM
1

"it's like wearing nothing at all... at all... at all."
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:57 AM
7

Aren't all jokes about Twitter pretty much outdated at this point?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:48 AM
2

There's actually a documentary on youtube you can watch about this topic, it's called facebookistan
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:22 AM
2

Ahh, caught the double-entendre Probably caught it from a hooker.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:34 AM
1

What was it another of Aca Demies sock puppet account shilling for manchild academy?
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:26 AM
3

MY MIND HAS BEEN BLOWN If you want to a prostitute & all she did was blow your mind than clearly one of you were doing something very wrong or alternatively something very right. ;)
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:17 AM
3

"And treat a feminist like a walking case of herpes" Isn't that how the next line goes?
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:17 AM
6

“She’s well groomed, cultured, classy, able to converse about anything—but not bringing into it any of her real-world problems or feelings.” So the exact opposite of your standard millennial woman & people wonder why that would be appealing.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:13 AM
7

3 or 4 years now. That's a funny way to spell "millions of years", tell me is that a local dialect?
/r/MensRights08/07/16 12:59 AM
2

The problem, however, is that not all things are equal. Women in this country do not enjoy equal rights or representation. Congress has the power to declare war, yet it severely lacks input from anyone who isn’t a straight, white man. You are kidding right? White women literally hold the largest single voting bloc in the entire country. You've literally just found a way to try to reinterpret largest voting bloc into "lacks equal rights." Sorry but that's grade A bullshit of the first order. As f…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 10:31 AM
2

Nope that's 81 dollars and change. Though to be fair that's how much it made only in the UK, but still that's absolutely shit, much like the film apparently.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 10:26 AM
4

The relationship became terrible about eight weeks into it. I had found evidence she was cheating. And that my friend is the exact second you should have metaphorically kicked her ass to the curb. NEVER STICK YOUR DICK IN CRAZY
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:47 AM
4

Come on ladies, you know better than this. Your 16 year old daughters need to be completely sober when playing naked twister.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:38 AM
7

If not that, then definitely "a seduction"
/r/MensRights30/06/16 04:39 AM
1

So, again, am I crazy? Is advocating responsibility really just shifting the blame to the victim? No you are not crazy, nor is it victim blaming. See there is this thing called agency, which allows you to make meaningful choices about your life. One fo those choices is personal safety & it's called personal safety because it refers to the safety of an individual. Yes, you should take responsibility for your own active safety, men have to do this every single day, equality means women have to as …
/r/MensRights28/06/16 04:26 AM
1

LOL, now I've got a funny image in my head of one of the mobile infantry shouting into a camera: "This is an ugly feminist, a bug feminist!"
/r/MensRights21/06/16 08:35 AM
7

So the Starship Trooper model of citizenship.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 05:28 AM
30

Funny, that's what people said in 1961 as well & we all know what happened in 1962.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 01:36 AM
1

"Circumcision has medical benefits" Actually circumcision does have medical benefits, what it doesn't have is reasonable preemptive medical benefits that would justify routine neo-natal circumcision.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:16 AM
38

Feminist journalist Arthur Chu has a bone-chilling terrifying life goal He wants to touch boob, just once..... Not including his own.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:21 AM
98

If that happens the "victim" is awarded a larger amount as restitution. Which means that womens self interest is such that they feel ENTITLED to as much as possible & the state enables this negative behavior. If the state stopped enabling it, it would suddenly stop being asserted in such huge numbers.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 06:41 AM
2

they're all ripped and like 6 foot 5. it's fictional work. Actually both male & female characters have a diverse range of forms in comics. All idealized yes, but some quite different. Busty & tall Power Girl, to svelte & short Kitty Pryde. For male characters From the buff & tall Superman, to the athletic but skinny Spider-Man, to the balding, mustached dwarf Puck.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:28 AM
2

No I'm man enough to vote for a political parties stances as represented by their current representative. Oh, you mean am I man enough to vote for Hillary? FUCK NO, no one should be voting for her & that has nothing to do with being a man, she's a well documented liar, who political platform has flip flopped more than the entire population of Australia wearing flip flops.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:16 AM
4

originally it was set up that way because women didn't work, I also don't want to work, please send me 20% of your pay check for no reason, or i'll send the cops out to get ya. ;)
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:49 AM
2

Jesus that would have been a funny conversation. "Mrs Johnson, your husband was an organ donor, we would like to remove his penis & give it to another man, so he can fuck lots of women, it's what your husband would have wanted."
/r/MensRights17/05/16 01:11 AM
7

Here's what you do: You go to the meeting & when he claims that your son has done a thing, calmly point out why he's wrong. Now I'm going to let you in on a little secret, are you ready to have your socks blown off with this little secret? Here we go: The school has no power. They have literally no power whatsoever, they pretend that they are the voice of authority, but they aren't. They pretend they are an extended branch of law enforcement, they aren't. They pretend like they can press charges…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:10 AM
0

That's a very sophist view on why wars are fought. wars are fought over resources & irreconcilable differences in political belief, most often the irreconcilable differences in political belief that one country possess manifest destiny over another.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:52 AM
1

Raised by a feminist mother also - Can confirm. Wow, I dodged a bullet there. Mine was just every day backwards & a wannabe flower child.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:48 AM
2

I think the tone of this could have been more supportive It could have, but that would have required sugar coating reality & that would have watered down the impact of the message. The message is meant to be forceful & harsh.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 12:18 AM
15

Please help me understand my situation. Okay what I'm about to say I say with love: You were an idiot, that's what happened. Firstly you were manipulated into a relationship by a high conflict drama queen & then you act shocked when she turned that desire for drama on you, the second your drama value dropped. You never stick your dick in crazy: Even metaphorically sticking your dick in real crazy. So here's what you should do: Absolutely nothing. You need to accept that this has happened & take …
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:00 PM
2

You know how they keep on getting away with it. They tell the same lie over and over again to the exact people who most want to hear it.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 11:28 PM
1

Start by looking up the work of zoologist Desmond Morris in 1967. Then you can check out Robinson, V. C. (2015). "Support for the hypothesis that sexual breast stimulation is an ancestral practice and a key to understanding women’s health." Then jump across to any of the following articles to round out your understanding of the popular science Anderson, Judith L. (1988) Breasts, hips, and buttocks revisited – honest fatness for honest fitness. Ethology and Sociobiology vol. 9, pp.319-324. Anders…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 02:10 PM
2

No, I know who you are talking about, I'm saying what he claimed is bullshit. The man has no way to substantiate his claim, since no one on the planet but the Pirahã themselves can speak their language, even the author after 30 years couldn't speak or understand more than a handful of terms. So he could have claimed that they though breasts shot lasers & not only would it have been entirely immaterial, it also would have been entirely unfalsifiable. On top of which their complete lack of the abi…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 11:23 AM
1

The problem with this response is that they know many men are aroused by breasts so would be uncomfortable showing them. No, they know that they are a sexual organ. To them breasts shouldn't be a sexual organ but to many other people they are. No there is no "to them." That's like saying "To them water is not a liquid, it's a form of space pixie that grants wishes." You don't get your own special rules of science, sciences rules are objective & breasts are OBJECTIVELY a sexual organ.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 10:44 AM
1

People have actually talked to some of these tribal cultures and they don't view breasts as a sexual thing. They were quite surprised to learn that other people do. Rubbish.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 10:41 AM
2

By your logic, since a horny woman touching a man's muscly chest or abs without his consent is also considered sexual assault, man's abs and chests are now sexual organs too. Right? Except it's not, it's just considered assault.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:46 AM
1

If you show me where it is a near-universally accepted scientific theory, I'll concede. To quote you: "You know, it's not exactly an obscure topic that you can't Google." Last time I checked breasts aren't a sexual organ. Except you've never checked. By your own words you are ignorant of the science. Sexual dimorphism and selection is not learned behavior. No, but learned behavior to that sexual dimorphism, when that sexual dimorphism doesn't serve the purpose of being a signaling device under s…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:42 AM
1

What you are presenting here is a hypothesis. No, what I'm presenting is the pre-eminent scientific theory. Also men have evolved deep voices, beards, and more muscle. They are ALSO considered sexual secondary characteristics. Which is NOT the same thing as a sexual organ. And many women are turned on by these things to various extents in choosing her mate. Yes, the key word their is SOME. Those are learned behaviors & are not the same thing as a hardwired attraction, which is what we have for t…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:17 PM
1

How do you know which came first? The front mounting or the tits? Neither one came first, they are an evolved trait, they literally evolved at the same time, in concert. If they didn't, neither would exist, since neither trait would serve an evolutionary purpose. In heavily tribal areas, women still have saggy unclothed breasts, and, due to lack of bras, they nearly universally hang down and flattened against the body with age. And? I'm not sure exactly how you think this a rebuttal. How does th…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:39 PM
1

Why would I have to be alive 10,000 years ago to confirm that humans had missionary? That would in no way invalidate the statement that humans are the only mammals that mount from the front. We know that humans mount from the front, we know that no other mammalian species does.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:11 AM
1

Would the breasts technically be a sex organ though? I mean they are sort of important in terms of nourishing newborns. Actually that's a common misconception. See the female breast is NOT necessary for nourishing newborns, the mammary gland is. We are literally the only great ape to have prominent external breast tissue. You never see an ape & say "phwa, look at the rack on her", because that's not a trait any other great ape possess. The female breast is a trait that is ONLY present in the hum…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:18 AM
3

I always find that argument to be super funny, especially when women try to convince you that the female breast is not a sexual organ. The answer to that claim is "fine, show us your tits then." Sure, under normal circumstances that would be considered super inappropriate, but since the woman in question has declared the breast to be not a sexual organ, it's now totally appropriate.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:11 AM
10

Once accused, you are guilty until proven innocent and society turns on you. Bullshit, you don't get treated as guilty until proven innocent. you get treated as if you are guilty until proven NOT MALE. An if you can't prove you aren't male you will never be proven innocent, you will simply be proven "we can't find out what you are guilty of, but we know you are guilty of something because why else would a male want to teach children if not to fuck them." Under the current system there is no way …
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:44 AM
10

Yep, as anyone who has ever worked security for a while will tell you, especially those who have worked strip club. You will have more trouble in a single "ladies night" then you will the rest of the month from male customers.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 12:44 AM
3

What a brilliant method for maintaining a closed mind. Unfortunately his close mind is accompanied by an open mouth.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 10:49 AM
14

Damn straight. I've told everyone at the school this boy has been goaded on by girls so they can go cry when he responds. An yet as a society we all wonder why relational aggression is a trait that remains in girls until high school & in some for life. THIS IS WHY.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 11:22 PM
3

I don't think most female teachers can make that distinction.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 11:19 PM
1

I know what you mean, I'm pretty sure I smooshed my face against a keyboard better than that at the age of 12.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 08:10 AM
3

Welcome to the world of being male. I don't think anyone of us HASN'T had someone claim that we are pedophiles at least once. I had someone try to claim I was a pedophile because I was sitting on a park bench, in the middle of the day, reading a book, waiting for a bus. Apparently it was creepy for me to be in a place where kids routinely played.... Only thing was that it was the middle of a school day, so there wasn't a single child around, on top of which there was no playground in this park.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:12 AM
6

"men have no inherent fathers right to children based on their frankly pitiful involvement in reproduction." Great, we'll stop paying child support then shall we. After all if we have no inherent rights on the basis of our contribution then by that same logic we must have no inherent responsibility.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 11:32 AM
5

Or "self-fulfilling prophecy" for $370, if ones a woman. ;)
/r/MensRights30/04/16 10:32 AM
2

Yes, those examples mostly fall under a morality clause, in which you can't be forced to take up work that you have legitimate moral issues with. However that positive doesn't outweigh the fact that the industry as a whole in Australia is just completely useless. They are government sub contractors who have no insight int o the job market, because unlike America there are just not enough jobs to go around. We have 750,000 unemployed people in Australia in any given month, on top of which we have…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:17 AM
2

If they're going to make an exemption for sex work, why not make an exemption for vegetarians who don't want to work in a meat factory? Australia already does.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:33 AM
1

Oh crap, I've just had a great idea for a shirt. On the front it says "this is what a feminist looks like", but on the back is a picture of a morbidly obese, ugly, rainbow coloured hair, wearing problem glasses land whale, screaming "I am intolerant to reality"
/r/MensRights27/04/16 06:00 AM
1

Get yourself a shirt that reads "This is what a meninist looks like." An then when she comments on your appearance as both an asshole & an embarrassment she doesn't want to be seen with in public, you can explain to her that the feeling is neutral.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:58 AM
42

That's because when it comes to human sexual interaction women just don't have the social filter men do. Doesn't matter if it's hens nights, or ladies night at a strip club, you will always have more trouble with the women than you will with the men, something I can confirm after roughly a decade of security work, back in the day.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:23 AM
26

It could be argued that the Tilted Kilt is hugely sexist towards men and plays on primal impulses to financially benefit women who hold the power. Which would only work if men were morons, but they aren't. If men are willing to pay to satiate a biologically hardwired desire, how is that any different than paying for food because one is hungry? Both parties know what the game is: The men know the women are being paid to be there & the women know the men are paying to be here because they are eye …
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:20 AM
1

It appears that it's gone, but I can't be sure, I could have just been banned from it. I tried logging out & checking it but it appears to be gone. Can anyone confirm?
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:08 AM
3

I just watched that trailer 3 times & I still have no idea what that movies about.... I do however know that I have no intention of watching it strictly on the basis that it looks like crap.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:41 PM
1

What about Cocaine & Yogurt?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 11:42 AM
3

I know what you mean.... Who the hell wants to see Muesli that early in the morning.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:20 AM
0

That way, no men or women can be admitted to the cafe, and the only customers will be anorexics ordering water flavoured by a single dip of an organic cabbage. LOL I think you just invented homeopathic cabbage juice.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:20 AM
6

That way, no men or women can be admitted to the cafe, and the only customers will be anorexics ordering water flavoured by a single dip of an organic cabbage. LOL I think you just invented homeopathic cabbage juice.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:19 AM
1

Would you all agree with the statement that women are valued in society solely for existing while men are valued based on what they can do to help others? Oh fuck yes. You ever want to see if this statement is true, simply refuse to be a utility as a man.... If a woman asks you to move something say no. If a woman wants you to pay for something don't. If you are in a line, demand to be able to go first because you are a man. Quit your job & demand your partner work to support you, then complain …
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:17 AM
1

You can also get baked on brownies, if they are the right sort of brownies.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:04 AM
79

Samantha Allen asks, “Will the Internet ever be safe for women?” Never & I'm about to tell you why that is a good thing. When you say "Samantha Allen asks, “will the Internet ever be safe for women?" what you actually mean is "when will people not correct women on the internet", to which the answer is never. You see women are humans & humans are fallible, hence women are fallible, hence women will always potentially be disagreed with. So to answer your question, women will never be safe on the i…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 02:29 PM
8

But it's a waste of taxpayers' money Yep, this is what's known in the industry as "security theatre."
/r/MensRights14/04/16 07:24 AM
3

Yes, it's still up & will remain so. She's just re uploading this same image over and over again pretending it's a new image each time.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:17 PM
4

automated system took it down while it was being cleaned out of rules violating material & it's already back up and running.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 08:32 AM
31

It's already back up guys.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 08:31 AM
2

whichever you prefer. Yet it was not posted to point out those shortcomings No it was posted because a "Swedish Feminist Loses Her Job Because Of Her Man-Hating Facebook Videos" which is data that is not in error as far as we know. Yet it was not posted to point out those shortcomings, like others have done for the other outlets you mentioned, it was posted as representative of this forums views. Which doesn't matter since all that matters is "is the data correct." Yet you stated if the informat…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:41 AM
2

He started with facts, and then went on to express some opinions which most would find pretty distasteful and certainly not "correct information" An those would be the parts people right here in this very discussion thread are pointing out the irrelevancies of. Which literally makes it no different than when we post articles from Jezebel, or HuffPo or the Guardian where we point out the errors in it. If you want to agree with the opinions on that site, knock yourself out, but it is not a news si…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:08 AM
2

You are being intentionally obtuse I'm really not: Either the information is correct or it's not. If the information is correct then it doesn't matter what the source is.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:58 AM
4

You don't see why MRAs would want to distance themselves from a site that mocks "fags" and belittles men they do not feel are masculine enough, or you don't see why I would worry about the impression that would give for a movement trying to support men who are trying to find identity and their place in modern day society? No more than I could see why MRA's would distance themselves from a site that says beating up men is a good and noble ting, by posting an article from Jezebel. An if someone do…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:30 AM
4

Considering how much MRAs are trying to distance themselves from ROK, or at least I hope they are, I just worry about impression. I don't see why, after all we post things from the Guardian, Hufpo & even Jezebel, that doesn't make us feminists though does it.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:01 AM
1

I'm not addressing their point, I'm addressing yours & I addressed the underlying faulty premise of everything you quoted, the rest of what you quoted is built upon that initial faulty premise & so didn't require further addressing. An since I'm only addressing your quoted text nothing else is material to this conversation.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:16 AM
1

11 Major Misconceptions About the Black Lives Matter Movement...1. The movement doesn’t care about black-on-black crime. The idea that black-on-black crime is not a significant political conversation among black people is patently false. LOL I just love this statement because it doesn't actually refute the statement. So this statement essentially says "oh Black Lives Matter doesn't actually care about black on black violence, but we are going to pretend to be on the basis that the 'black people'…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:25 AM
4

That's because pair bonding is meant to be complimentary, not competitive.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:57 AM
2

Because researching your own content is hard.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:55 AM
23

Especially if he said he was there to “inform people about the penis and how to please it” to a room full of children.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:55 AM
11

Mykeru’s Law: “As any progressive movement grows and achieves success, the probability of it being co-opted by women who want to make it all about their vagina approaches 1″
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:53 AM
8

No Hinch you are bang out of line. The idea of our prison system is that it's rehabilitative, you pay your debt to society & then you move on with your life, once your time is served it's served. I already think the "sex offenders registry" should be abolished already, as there are to many ways to get onto that list most of which have exactly nothing to do with sex & no ways to get off the registry when you do. there was a great article on this in the businessinsider. I will admit that the list …
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:50 AM
6

Where did you get this number? Because the FBI puts it at 27.8%. That's because the FBI is giving you actual numbers, they aren't comparing it to the size of the demographic..... Lets just put it this way, if 27.8% of all crimes are committed by black people & yet only make up roughly 13% of the American population, look at how that crime rate jumps. but it's not really racial, it's economic: studies of violent crimes in deprived neighbourhoods in Cleveland, Ohio, found that reductions in povert…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 06:23 AM
4

I'm not sure how it is a sham if they've been advocating for pretty much all the biggest victims of police violence. The sham is in the fact that they don't care if the person in question was doing something illegal at the time, which means they don't really think black lives matter. If they really thought black lives matter they would be busy getting black people in ghettos to drop the huge chip on their shoulder & out of ghettos into real jobs, via educational opportunities & general crime red…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 06:11 AM
-1

No he said she didn't care for herself, I'm pointing out the specific things about her personality that make her ugly. Similar but distinctly different statements.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:21 PM
1

I'm sick to death with people arguing for or against genital mutilation "because women prefer it that way". Sure & I like women with big tits, but it'd still be immoral for me to shove empty inflatable implants into the chest of a 6 day old female child.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 01:33 PM
3

You can't rape guys, don't be silly, everyone knows guys want sex all the time /s
/r/MensRights05/04/16 01:31 PM
6

Honestly, a two-month diet would put her in a fairly decent bracket, attractiveness wise. No it really wouldn't. It turns out that willful ignorance is utterly unattractive even before you add in conceited and opinionated. No amount of her starving herself would make those qualities less unattractive.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 01:29 PM
9

So even though they can all get the paper just fine on the cart, they put their actions on hold and waited for a "man" to come do it... but then showed they were perfectly capable of it themselves anyhow... so why the fuck was I called...? It's got nothing to do with if they are capable, they as women still assume your existence is contingent on your utility. To them you are not a human being you are a vibrator super-glued onto a utility robot, with an ATM strapped to your back.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 01:50 AM
1

Well lets test that theory shall we. You my dear lady clearly raped me.... what's that? You say you didn't? Well your denial that you raped me is the same as demanding proof & therefore you are rape culture. An with that the Socratic method makes another feminist assertion collapse into a gibbering mess.... Which isn't as much of a collapse as you would think since it started as a gibbering mess.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 02:21 PM
2

Sorry all the feminists are busy fighting truly worth while battles, like telling us why air conditioning & glaciers are sexist, while fighting the evils of man-spreading.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:58 AM
2

Tell me about it, back in the day I worked security on the floor of a strip club (before I became a librarian, aint that a bit of a jump) & I know for a fact I wasn't taking home $1,000 at the end of the night.... Heck we were barely taking home a 10th of that.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:53 AM
1

Actually most strippers earn more than you do, for doing things that they are good at & many do it because they want to. So becoming a stripper may actually be a great life decision.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:51 AM
16

Minors can't give meaningful consent.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 06:39 AM
1

Notice how they fail to use the word "rape" or "sexual assault of a minor." An you wonder why people think women don't rape, they simply have sex without consent.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 06:39 AM
4

I love how she makes it all about her and her needs.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:15 AM
23

If you listened to feminists being a woman is a life handicap.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 04:57 AM
1

It's not: It's deeply sexist, really stupid & just the most ignorant drivel one could possibly shit onto a page, but it's not misandrist as written. Keep in mind that misandry is the hatred of ALL men on the basis of them being male, this doesn't demonstrate that, he clearly thinks he's the one good man (tm).
/r/MensRights26/03/16 04:01 PM
2

It's rare that you see a man "mansplaining" to other men. Sure, but only because when men mansplain to other men, we just call it explaining. Because only women would think to attempt to turn "having something explained to them" into a gender based form of oppression.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 03:59 PM
1

Exceptions exist, of course. But not nearly as many as people would like to pretend.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 03:56 PM
1

No, it's not. Yes it is. %60 of second marriages end in divorce. %60 of the %50 that already had a marriage fail. Yes & since 51% is a majority, how is it that you think that 60% of 50% equals 0%? Because if it's any higher that 0% that would make it a majority.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:25 PM
4

No, but First marriages having a divorce rate of 40-50%, and second marriages having a divorce rate of 60% is a majority.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:37 AM
8

dont live in states that legally encourage hypergamy Unfortunately that would be any western society with no fault divorce, which is pretty much all of them.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:26 AM
20

I'm actually surprised to see it had peaked around the mid 90's and was lower before that. Don't be, the 90's is we had the most accurate reporting, before that it simply wasn't reported for socio-religious reasons, ala "what was a nice girl like you doing dirty things like that" & "well you are soiled goods now, no man will ever want to marry you," that kind of malarkey.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:16 PM
13

Yeah, don't you know it's current year?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:13 PM
1

Yes. If I had my way if a woman could be found guilty of getting pregnant by deception, she would be found guilty of fraud: Because it is fraud.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:34 AM
-2

Did I rape her because I failed to disclose it and if she had known she would not have had sex with me. No, since the reason for sex is immaterial to consent, even under the hypothetical mistaken consent concept. It SHOULD be some form of either assault or maybe fraud if you told her you had had a vasectomy & hadn't & you were having sex to force her to become pregnant, but it's not rape the other way round.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 09:17 AM
2

I took him home that night, but he couldn’t keep his erection. So, we took a break to see if it would return in a little while, and this is when we ended up talking about real feminist issues. honestly that says more about you than him.... You are so unattractive that spending time with you causes men to get a derection. Not sure if you are just physically unattractive or it's your personality, but clearly something about you is a physical turn off for men. He claimed that men were victims of do…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:18 AM
9

I didn't say privilege I said advantage & depending on which country we are talking about the answer would still be yes. There is a reason why the Pankhursts Womens Lib group of the UK & those associated with it disappeared overnight when The Great War was announced & then was replaced by those same people becoming the White Feather Brigade. Because they thought there was a chance they might get conscripted too if they had the right to vote, when what they wanted was the right to vote, WITHOUT t…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:15 AM
4

Intelligence has nothing to do with being knowledgeable: It's impossible to hold two competing views on a topic without major cognitive dissonance & yes religion and astrophysics are a decent enough example, though creationism & evolutionary biology would have been better. It has nothing to do with how smart one is & everything to do with not holding two mutually exclusive world views, especially when one is predicated on things that can be objectively demonstrated & the other is completely un-f…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:34 AM
13

No feminists like special advantages they pretend are equality. If feminists like equality they would actually fight for equality. In which case one would have no problem naming me a single real world change instigated by feminism as an ideology for the specific benefit of men and boys in the first world, towards the goal of equality.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:28 AM
6

You can get banned from Offmychest simply for commenting on Tumblr in Action or Kotaku in Action.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:27 AM
2

To whoever is downvoting Geniice for asking a valid question: Downvoting someone asking a valid question doesn't make you look smart, it makes you look like a fucking moron. In fact it makes the rest of us look like morons by extension, since the only people who need to downvote a valid question rather than answering it are people INCAPABLE of answering a question about a stance they hold. Don't do it.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:29 AM
3

My rebuttals to those points. "I want him to be normal" Having a foreskin is normal. Slicing off a fully functional part of the body for non medical reasons is what's abnormal. "I want it to look normal" Having a foreskin is normal & so looks normal. Your views of what looks normal is deeply warped. "How do I explain to him why his penis looks different?" Who is it exactly one thinks will be comparing the penises of infants? If as a young adult he wants to have a circumcision then that will be h…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:23 AM
2

LOL, like they would ever give people from Jezebel a job. Sure Huffpo & Salon have almost no standards, but "almost none" is still significantly higher than what people from Jezebel could muster.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:47 AM
5

I got autobanned from /r/offmychest for posting to /r/ImGoingToHellForThis because it's apparently a hate subreddit, An by hate subreddit I think they mean a subreddit that they personally hate.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:01 AM
6

It is hostile to women (feminist women at least). After all there is nothing as hostile to a bullshit ideology than facts that demonstrate it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:48 AM
2

LOL, this really does feel like the start of that movie he's was in: Mazes and monsters. Next thing we'll hear is that he flipped out in some caves, where he imagined he was fighting the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:00 AM
2

It's racist to say all Muslims are potential terrorists, No it's not. In fact it's not twice. Firstly it's not because all human beings are potential terrorists. Regardless of what ethnicity you are, YOU as you are right now are potentially a terrorist. An it's not a second time because it can't be racists since there is no such race as Muslim. Muslims are followers of a religious ideology, that is not restricted to any ethnicity.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 04:58 AM
1

Pretty much. Except, you can't "racially profile" Muslims. Muslims aren't a race. You beat me to it.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 04:56 AM
1

Even as a photographer myself, who tried his hand at street photography before realizing it was not my cup of tea, it does still come off as a little creepy even when you are doing it. So I pretty much went back to shooting people & animals, with occasional forays into crime photography: Ironically the only time I've shot a naked person was when a guy climbed onto a billboard, got naked except for flip flops & a bumbag & waved a gun around. Feel free to take a look at some of my other stuff.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:27 AM
5

Maybe I could learn a thing or two yep, like never forget to bring Mikhail Benea his beer.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:10 AM
5

For the purpose of commercial use, yes. They can be sued for it.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:08 AM
5

Actually that's not all that creepy on it's own, since it's exactly what street photographers do. No, the creepiness comes when you publish a book of these people, sell it on the sexiness of these people, all without their consent.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:55 AM
3

Oh, I can't wait till some of those guys sue the producers of the book since they have clearly not been asked to sign a model release form & this is clearly a for profit book sold on the basis of these men, given the books title.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:53 AM
1

Did you tell her to kindly fuck off? I would have, she essentially is demanding an apology for her own mistaken belief & her inability to alter that mistaken belief when told point blank that she was wrong. This is a clear cut case of DARVO: Avoid this woman at all costs, no matter how thirsty you are, you never stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:51 AM
4

Don't forget to get her to sign up for another 10 accounts to agree with everything she says.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 07:51 AM
20

And if she tries you can then turn around to her & point out that if the only way she can get people to agree with her is through punitive means rather than convince them with facts that is EXACTLY why male lawyers are getting promoted ahead of her.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 07:50 AM
27

Isn't feminism essentially just a meme at this point?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 03:37 AM
1

Yet the only male response to hers had been from an old admirer making light of the situation, amorously answering with ‘right here’. Oh you lucky duck you, you spotted a beta male orbiter in his natural environment.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 03:29 AM
8

I know a lot of single 30 year old women and they quite bluntly say to me and my wife: "there are no good men around, they have all been taken" or "my problem is that I am too nice" like bollocks you are! Yep, it's not that there are no good men, there are plenty, they just don't want anything to do with you. If a man is single in his 30's it's because A. he is busy fucking women in their early 20's B. Was married & then divorced by a woman who took it all with her & now he wants nothing to do w…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 02:54 AM
12

Yeah it really is a Maslow scale issue if ever I've heard one: People are starving and homeless, but if men taking up seating space is your big issue it's pretty much a sign you've got nothing real to complain about.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 02:42 AM
4

Heck Australia recently did something similar with vaccinations. We had to many stupid people saying they wouldn't vaccinate their children because it caused Autism & so the government brought in a "no jab, no pay" policy for people on government assistance & suddenly we had a month long vaccine shortage as every single one of these unemployed single mothers compromised their supposed ethics & scrambled to get their kid immunized. These were mothers who legitimately thought that there child woul…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 01:49 AM
6

The USA does a less than stellar job of providing for the single parents that would be left from a legal parent surrender. Except that the amount of single mothers would decrease under such a system, especially if women who chose to be single mothers through choice also got no government funding. When you give people two paths, one requires hard work & personal sacrifice, the other gives all the same advantages but WITHOUT the hard work and sacrifice, the second is what the majority of people wi…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 01:21 AM
1

Stop, just stop, you aren't arguing a point anymore. You were wrong, you have had a chance to demonstrate you weren't wrong at which point you started attempting to move the goal posts. You've attempted to change what you've said, you've attempted to change what I've said, you've tried your hand at basic sophistry by parroting back words like ad hominem attack when what you meant was "stop disagreeing with me & bringing facts that disagree with me." An so this conversation, or at least your part…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:02 AM
3

Don't be silly, Gail doesn't have any genitals, she's built like a Ken doll. It's why she's so angry about the existence of porn.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:15 PM
10

Mr Goddard is the lead tutor on three courses and he is also shown lecturing students in a university video. I watched that lecture it was very confusing.... I kept on waiting for him to take his pants off & bend some young busty college girl over the desk & give her the fucking of a life time, but it didn't happen. He just kept on teaching people. It's almost like being a porn star & being a university lecturer & authority in a field of study is not the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:13 AM
36

The question is which is more hideous: The person who took advantage of a system in which men lack legal rights, or the system in which men lack those legal rights to begin with?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:03 AM
2

The truth is problematic.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:00 AM
0

Your ad hominem attack on my wording as an attempt to deflect from your argument is sad. No there was no ad hominem attack, an ad hominem attack attack is what happens when someone attacks the speaker rather than the argument. I've exactly attacked your argument, you just happen to be be utterly wrong. I repeat: the bottom line is that blindness is not a serious risk of taking estradiol. But it is a risk & so you've just admitted that you were wrong & I was right. You pretended that it is in ord…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:33 AM
0

Sure, I should have said that the likelihood is around 0.13%, Which is an increase, hence your initial position the one you are attempting to defend is by your own admission wrong. My error pales in comparison to your firm stance that blindness is a serious danger of taking estradiol. LOL except that wasn't your argument, your argument was & I quote: It does not increase chance of blindness This was your non rebuttal of my statement & again I quote: 17β-estradiol does increase the likelihood of …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:33 AM
0

/facepalm. Actually you're entire argument hangs on a technicality. No it's based on the fact that it demonstrably increases the chance of spontenous blindness as a result of utilizing a drug, as defined by the FDA. After I linked to the huge list of things that are more likely to cause blindness you're only digging yourself deeper by continuing. Hahahahahahahahaha, no. I'm not sure if you quite grasp how stupid the argument you just made is but it's the equivalent of declaring that guns don't k…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 09:56 AM
1

Its still her and her words. Without context or insight, so no the outrage is purely faked, over a fake instance from a person whose entire twitter account is posting stupid shit.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:40 AM
1

It's originally from someone called Gap Mami. Yes her statement says that, but it's not associated with that image as context. She then follows up with the statement And no baby needs $800 bih!! My personal needs are more than $800. The baby will be fine You've got no idea what her fiscal situation is, neither do I. For all we know she has a trust fund. So yes, the image is not associated with the text & so it's an attempt to insert visual context where no such context existed & as such is fake.…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:23 AM
2

Guys, you know this is fake right.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:52 AM
0

It does not increase chance of blindness. Actually it does. It is literally on the FDA's list of possible side effects. Also treating someone with CAIS as male is incorrect and cruel. Good thing no one advocated for that then isn't it.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:09 AM
0

Look up androgen insensitivity syndrome, and genetic disorders where someone is XXY and then try saying all of that again. Those are not a sex, those are chromosomal disorders. To call those a sex is the equivalent of declaring someone with down syndrome is a different species.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:05 AM
1

tl;dr: "I have no sources other than my ass, I talk shit whilst pretending to know what I'm talking about, all because I have an irrational hatred of trannies" LOL no. I have sources, you simply don't know what they are & since you haven't requested a citation on any given point none were offered. Estradiol, or more precisely, 17β-estradiol, is a steroid and estrogen sex hormone, and the primary female sex hormone. Estradiol is produced especially within the follicles of the female ovaries, but …
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:23 AM
1

Yeah your post is full of shit LOL no it really isn't, which is why you don't rebut anything said. You have got to be fucking kidding me. "Estrogen makes you go blind!!!" 17β-estradiol is not estrogen in the same way that water is not oxygen. An yes, 17β-estradiol does increase the likelihood of spontaneous blindness, you can actually go check the side effects list yourself if you don't believe it. It's not like this is some kind of secret data, the data is part of the public record. And this is…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:34 AM
7

Your sex is more than your chromosomes as evidenced by the huge number of intersex conditions out there. No, your sex is EXACTLY your chromosomes, as evidenced by the huge number of chromosomal conditions out there. In reality there is no such thing as an "intersex condition," as there is no such thing as medically intersexed. There are a hit load of chromosomal disorders, but these too do not change ones sex, so for example if one has CAIS one is still male, even if one presents superficial ext…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 11:01 AM
8

Your sex is largely determined by your hormone levels. An XY individual can be phenotypically female after a long enough time with raised estrogen and decreased testosterone levels. No you really can't: I don't know who told you otherwise, but you should smack that person upside the head for so badly misinforming you. Sex is determined by genetics, you can add more estrogen while blocking andorgens & that doesn't make one a woman, any more than replacing your blood with liquid wood chips would m…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:28 AM
1

Newsflash to everyone, gays and pervs have been around since the dawn of time. Old men went to wrestling training in Greek times to watch and "admire" the bodies of younger men (since they did their shit nude). Reminds me of that old joke I heard from a historian. In ancient Greece, do you know what they use to use to separate the men from the boys? A crowbar. ;)
/r/MensRights04/03/16 06:56 AM
6

There's a difference between "identifying" as a woman and "medically transitioning" to a woman. No there really isn't. If you identify as a woman you are a man who thinks he's a woman & if you are transitioning you are a man who thinks he's a woman & is pumping his body full of carcinogenic hormones to make the pretense of cosplaying as a woman slightly less unbelievable.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 06:52 AM
3

I can tell you exactly which issue of Ms Magazine it was, because it was the first issue they ever put out, which contained that now seminal cover. I'm sure there is a copy of the forward written by Gloria Steinem but I don't know where to find a copy online off the top of my head. As for the white pant suit, Wonder Woman had pretty much flopped in the 60's so they relaunched it, with Diana giving up her powers, at which point she doneed a White Pant suit with mod over tones & learned martial ar…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:17 AM
2

Her existence as a feminist icon. If you remember they tried to develop Diana with her white pant suit era, but the feminists of Ms Magazine complained about it, making a big old fuss about it.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:46 AM
2

but her creator was convinced that women were superior Oh it was more than just thinking they were superior, he thought their superiority lay in something he referred to as "loving surrender." The idea that womens power essentially came from loving to be submissive & using the power of submissive henpecking to prosper. Today that would be considered passive aggressive at best, female self infantlization at worst.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:28 AM
3

You are not wrong, the problem with Wonder Woman is the same problem there has ALWAYS been with Wonder Woman: She's not grounded in anything. If I were to ask you where Spider-Man was based you could tell me. If I asked you what Spider-MAn stood for you could tell me. If I asked you what Spider-Man fought against & why, you could tell me. If I asked you what tools he used to fight against them you could tell me. Same goes for practically every solo comic hero, except Wonder Woman. Even other fem…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:08 AM
4

Oh it's worse than that, just take a look at the governance of paradise island. It's a cult of personality, autocratic theocratic dictatorship, predicated on enforced labour & military service, without any form of industry, while stuck with stagnated art & culture. Worse yet their autocratic dictator really does get her power from god (or gods, plural), while being a dictator for life, but since she's immortal, she's an autocratic fascist theocratic dictator for eternity or until someone kills h…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:21 AM
1

Actually in the crisis to crisis era they did explain it: Diana is not an amazon/human, she was crafted out of magical clay, because Hippolyta really wanted a child & there are no children on Paradise Island (what with the island missing one vital component necessary for reproduction). As such Diana was stronger & faster then the other amazons.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:18 AM
3

and despite only having his families vast levels of wealth to fall back on.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:12 AM
4

Example: If Cap had just picked up a rifle and shot hitler near the beginning of WWII the significance of everything that came from the war, the horrors, the triumphs in ending it all would be meaningless. Cap would have just made himself nearly meaningless along with everything else connected to that horrible era. Which is actually what happened with Captain America in the 1950's. Once he no longer had Nazis to fight his book essentially died. Then they tried it again in the 1950's with the Red…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:12 AM
7

Here is some simple maths for everyone: Humans lie, women are human, hence women lie. Seems pretty basic to me, not sure what they are getting tripped up on.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:44 PM
1

Clearly she is not a sexual predator, she self identifies as an attack helicopter.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:09 AM
6

Boom, you must be a sniper because you just blew my mind.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:52 PM
3

To be fair, most humans are awful at stats.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:43 AM
1

I would assume the lack of potential hypergamy that would come with not fucking men would mean that lesbian women who actually want the better things in life would have to earn them under their own merit, just as men have to.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:25 AM
1

I'd check their rating first. I have no problem purchasing from people cleaning house. I've got great prices on so many out of print books that way.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:12 AM
2

So it doesn't even control for being the same object? A rare first edition of a highly prized book is being judged right beside a trashy mum porn romance novel? THIS is why I avoided looking at the actual "study", because I knew it was going to be bullshit from the second I heard it's initial premise.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:10 AM
1

Actually no. On average girls get their first period at the age of 12, not 14 (the standard age range being between 8 & 16). An even if that were not the case that still has no bearing on when the law says a the age of consent should be, since that is literally an arbitrary number, which is why it strangely differs from state to state. It also has no bearing on teenage sexual experimentation, which is why in many countries the age of consent law is as young as 12 with Romeo and Juliet laws of co…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:49 PM
1

So you are agreeing with me now, while disagreeing with your self? Okay then.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 10:29 AM
3

No it really isn't. See this is the problem with Americans being this obsessed & terrified with the idea of teens having sex that you actually have no idea what these words you use mean. A pedophile is someone who is primarily sexually attracted to PRE pubescent children, that's children who have yet to go through the Tanner stage of puberty. Being attract to people roughly between the ages of 15 and 19 would make one an Ephebophile. That's a completely different thing. Also for the record the a…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 09:36 AM
5

Yep, that's so America. You guys are still pathologically obsessed & terrified with the idea of teenagers having sex. Sometimes the rest of the world forgets how backwards you guys are on this particular point. I mean how out of whack must ones priorities be when one considers the response to two people having consensual sex is to shoot one of them at point blank range.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:06 AM
2

"We women already make a disproportionate contribution to society." Technically that's true since it didn't say a disproportionately HIGH contribution. After all if all women took tomorrow off a few industries would suffer, for instance women would have to look after their own children since both forms of paid baby sitting would shut down (crèches & schools), but the world would continue on. If all men took the day off, human civilization would legitimately collapse: No food, no power, no water,…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:00 AM
3

Note: Watching "A Man For All Seasons" right now. Still brilliant after 50 years. Ironically I believe this scene from that very movie sums up Kirbys position & the reason it's wrong.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 08:20 PM
2

In fact we make up the majority, just as we do in things like gamergate.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:13 AM
2

Shouldn't teacher be intelligent people to some degree? If teachers were intelligent people they wouldn't have gone in to teaching to start with.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 05:14 AM
2

Don't know about Rhode Island but in the UK & Australia, as well as many states in America women voted long before they had suffrage. In fact we know this to be fact in many places since the idea of the secret ballet is a relatively new concept & we have access to some of the old voting records that show women voting.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:08 AM
1

Depending where you are talking about possessing a penis wasn't a qualifier.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:17 AM
2

Because the value of men is lower than the cost of cancer research. Men are literally cheaply replaceable.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:04 PM
5

No matter how evolved I thought we were, it turns out I wanted a girl, badly, and not for reasons I’m proud of. Do I want a boy who’s smarter than me? Not really. I already know plenty of men, young and old, who think they’re smarter than me. Wow, you really are just a terrible human being aren't you.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:59 AM
3

The man in the second video was also gay.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:52 AM
2

Alzheimer has physical causes, its in the DSM. Checkmate. Many long standing mental disabilities have a physical cause, but Gender Dysphoria doesn't appear to be one of them. The DSM was listed so you could look it up yourself.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 01:33 AM
1

Umm no. A few wack-jobs think that. Just covered this in the reply above yours. I won't copy and stick it, if you want to read it, it's there, ultimately it's your choice.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:28 PM
1

Do you have any sources that support your claim that the general medical consensus is that is a delusional state, You don't need a source for this one, you need a counter source. Until there is a medical consensus based on demonstrable evidence that there is physiological cause for the transgender condition, it remains purely a psychological one (classified as Gender Dysphoria in both the ICD-10 CM and DSM-5), hence a persistent delusional state, not all that different from other such persistent…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:18 PM
3

Their brain sex is already the other sex Actually there is no peer reviewed science that currently demonstrates this point. In fact at the moment the general scientific consensus is that trans people are generally suffering from a delusional state. Surgery is not that effective, but hormones definitely are. Nope neither are effective, which is why so many trans individuals kill themselves AFTER undergoing any attempt at body modification be it hormonal or surgical.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 09:18 AM
7

Putting a hand around someones throat and threatening to send them home in an ambulance on live TV= OK. Where as clearly the larger issue is that the man in question is unaware of how an ambulance works.... The only way an ambulance is going to take you home from a location where you have been assaulted would be if you live in a hospital.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 09:15 AM
4

She's a women's rights activist! Not a feminist I noticed that too, way to attempt to distance yourself from the negativity of the bullshit you feminists brought on yourself.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 01:21 AM
4

Not only did he lose tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, A hundred thousand dollars at last count.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 01:19 AM
1

Right, now turn around & hit them in civil court for court costs & loss of income over the last 3 years. That will teach them for using the court system to run a vendetta.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 01:18 AM
2

PFFFT, forget admit, when you go to a UN womens conference & demand that disagreement with your views be legislated as being against the law on the basis of the power of vagina, that's not an admission of special treatment, its a freaking demand for special treatment.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 06:29 AM
2

You're denying the existence of the neo militant anti thiest movement. No I'm telling you that a non existent thing is non existent.... Not to get tautological about it. Have you seen the four horsemen? Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Bill Maher, Christopher Hitchens, etc. Yes I have, but as has already been stated there is no such thing as neo atheists, or new atheists, or militant atheists, there are just atheists, so name dropping people who are just atheists doesn't support your point. Seriousl…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:28 AM
1

Mate you can quote any uninformed people you like, it doesn't make it less uninformed.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 07:13 AM
3

A recent movement of specificly militant atheism There is no such thing as militant atheism, there is no army, navy or airforce of the great & powerful nation of atheism: It's not a thing that exists. Athiesm is people who lack a belief in the existence of a god claim, you cannot lack said belief in a militant fashion. There is no such movement. with some right wing ideas of foreign policy. Which has nothing to do with atheism, that's like saying the Neo Omnivores, or militant omnivores. A group…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 06:44 AM
4

I feel like the neo athiest movement just clings to her because a black female ex Muslim makes them look good. LOL no Firstly there is no such thing as a neo atheist, or a new atheist or any such thing, there is just atheist, people who lack a belief in god claims. Secondly atheists don't give a hoot about Ayaan Hirsi Ali, they never have, never will. An thirdly Atheism doesn't need propping up: It is a perfectly sound position on it's own.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:57 AM
3

Yes Muslim women to.... Here's how it goes under Sharia law if a Muslim woman reports a rape. Woman: That man raped me Sharia Court: Did you rape her Man: No Sharia Court: Can you provide four eye witnesses who watched him rape you. An here's where it gets interesting Woman: No Sharia Court: Case dismissed & a punishment for you woman, for daring to lie about this mans honor. Or alternatively Woman: Yes Sharia Court: Okay your punishment for being raped is a beating.... With shoes! Sharia law, w…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:19 AM
6

Ain't that the case. One of the most positive things I've seen about MRAs is a critical desire to put the truth BEFORE the "narrative". If something is found to be false MRAs are quick to call it out and denounce it. Sure, but that's because we court public debate, unlike feminists. Our ideas HAVE to be solid, otherwise we would fail at the basic Socratic debate. This is why feminists won't debate MRA's, because they know on some level that there ideology is weak sauce.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 11:17 AM
0

Wow, what an apt description of virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:38 PM
1

You wouldn't have to avoid the site, no man would ever be cleared to be on the site. If all it took was some of the women to vote no, then they would remove every single man from the site.... At which point they would complain, oh where have all the good men gone, to which the answer was "you thought yourselves to good for them."
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:06 PM
5

There is only one possible answer to this statement: No, you are wrong. An if I did as you instructed & pretended you were not wrong, on the threat that you would call me a misogynist, you would STILL be wrong.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:47 PM
2

probably best to link this to /r/sentientcactus since he was the one who wanted to know where it's from. I already own the trade of this.... I've been collecting invincible for a while now, I only have Invincible Vol. 9: Out of This World Invincible Vol. 12: Still Standing Invincible Vol. 13: Growing Pains Invincible Vol. 14: The Viltrumite War to collect. Problem is I'm preternaturally cheap, to the point of being legitimately referred to as niggardly: I'll get the rest when they eventually pop…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:15 PM
2

Issue 110. Other examples would be Hulk Nightwing Green Arrow Midngihter Kyle Rayner (implied)
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:17 AM
1

Actually that coercive consent under the law now. So that would still be rape, also if she says no & you don't have sex that's still sexual assault. Yep, feminism has certainly worked hard to poison the well hasn't it.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:32 AM
1

Though i have heard women say bigger is better Always from women who have never had "bigger." They imagine bigger would be better, but they have nothing to compare it against: If they did they would quickly change their tune.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:30 AM
2

What's funny is it doesn't work the other way round. A womans vagina is not defined as getting looser if a man is angry with her, because a man would never think to insult a woman like that. Maybe we are just classier then they are.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:26 AM
2

These quotes from the article are clearly satire. Except they aren't clearly satire, they are clearly words, but it's yet to be demonstrated that they are satirical & not deadly serious. Here are some other equally satirical sounding quotes that aren't at all satire "If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." "I believe that wom…
/r/MensRights03/01/16 10:00 AM
3

That was the satirical identity of a woman who is now pro mra. Citation required: As far as I know she is dead serious & not a poe. Evidence to the contrary in support of your position would be required before I considered changing my opinion.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 03:59 AM
1

But you can't call it a rigger warning because that would trip my traumatic time playing Shadowrun.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:16 AM
14

Yes this is really true. Roughly 1 in 3 victims of intimate partner violence are male. Roughly 50% of NON reciprocal intimate partner violence is male. Amount of resources avaialable for male victims: Almost zero.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:15 AM
5

LOL I love the no fap subreddit, for a sub about not masturbating you'll never see a sub filled with so many absolute wankers.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:07 AM
18

There WAS a time when women couldn't vote Yes, it was the same time in which men couldn't vote. This idea of an individual vote is a new concept that has existed for less than 200 years & the idea of ALL individuals voting, rather than just those with "worth" such as property owners is likewise brand new in our history. when they were nothing more than brood mares Oh yes, what time period exactly do you think that was in exactly? and if they were lucky, they could get jobs as servants or teacher…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:03 PM
18

Feminism has never been an egalitarian movement, it has always been a special interest group, long before the word "feminism" even existed.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:59 PM
23

Back in the days when men universally received preferential treatment Ahhh yes, back in the made up mythical days in which women were sent off to war, forced to work in shitty deadly conditions to provide for their families & their husbands could run around like crazy people & she would be punished for her husbands transgressions.... Oh wait, I've got men & women mixed up again.... just invert the genders on those statements. i.e. women were basically brood mares, couldn't vote, had no job optio…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:57 PM
1

I believe it's a reference to "first world problems." Physically below average women complaining that they can't get into physical positions that physically excellent women can, as they copy fictional characters, while actual people starve to death in third world nations. but that would just be me guessing since I didn't make the video, I simply linked to it.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 10:39 AM
2

Its Cosmo for men Especially given how many articles they posses that were just straight up pussy begging.... Hmmmm, I wonder why a magazine that spends a lot of time pussy begging doesn't like a group that is openly opposed to pussy begging.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 09:43 AM
3

Don't go to the cops at all, no criminal law has been broken. You'll simply be wasting your time going to the cops & you'll be told as much. What you do is tell the person to stop talking shit. Edit: I am of course assuming that "attack" was not a physical attack, but an attack on ones character. Otherwise press charges for assault.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 03:30 PM
6

A year ago she found my porn on two occasions and threatened to leave the house with my sister if I did not because they were both unsafe. Yeah mate she is crazy..... Actually no, I take that back, she sounds like she is completely out of touch with reality, which isn't necessarily the same ting as being mentally ill. My condolences on your current situation.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 02:51 PM
1

She agreed to have sex with the person in front of her. No she didn't. She agreed to have sex with a man, a man who didn't exist.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 11:12 PM
1

However, that has no relation whatsoever to the situation here. It exactly has a relation to this situation. She consented to have sex with a guy, that guy did not exist, she had sex with a woman she did not consent to have sex with, hence rape by deception. If this is rape, then we can never be sure we are having consensual sex Sure you can: If you have to blindfold the person so they don't realize they are fucking someone who is not what they said they are, that's rape by deception.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:20 PM
1

Was the guy who blew me the woman I consented to sex with? No it was a completely different person, just as this woman was not the man she consented to have sex with. The man she consented to have sex with does not exist, hence rape by deception.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:59 PM
1

Rape by deceit is crap. Okay, lets test your theory. You consent to sex with a beautiful woman, you are blind folded & then you are given great oral sex.... Once the blind fold comes off you find that it's actually a guy who blew you. Is this rape? After all you consented to the sex, right?
/r/MensRights23/12/15 05:16 AM
0

Actually it does, it's called rape by deceit.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 12:46 AM
-1

5-alpha-reductase deficiency? Sounds like a special kind of specially formulated yogurt doesn't it.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 12:44 AM
1

Of course you're allowed. But you aren't allowed, that's the point that was being made. If you hit on a woman while not being sufficiently attractive in her subjective regard, you aren't just that guy who was unsuccessful at courting that woman, you are now that creepy guy who practically raped her with your sexual interest in her & needs to be either beaten by male surrogate violence for your temerity, or reeducated in feminist reeducation camps to know your place. That is the point that was be…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:10 PM
2

I think you may be conflating "being able to hit on a woman" for being the same as "woman must accept the offer of being hit upon."
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:54 AM
2

I have no idea what feminism is supporting or fighting anymore LOL, it doesn't stand for anything, feminism is just critical theory, critical theories entire shtick is simply being critical of everything. If you removed every single man from the planet Earth feminists would then declare that the patriarchy is oppressing women by making them do all the work without men doing it for them & every other blog, or guardian article would still be a "where have all the good men gone, toxic masculinity i…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:52 AM
14

“The law is supposed to be gender-blind." Yep, I read that in a book once.... I think the book was called "legal ethics and other fairy tales for gullible children."
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:32 PM
0

That doesn't help your case, the term hermaphrodite fell out of use in the medical community when talking about humans since it didn't mean anything. It also wasn't helped that the term hermaphrodite when utilized in science referred to TRUE hermaphroditism, a trait NOT found in humans. There are two types of True Hermaphroditism: sequential hermaphroditism & simultaneous hermaphrodites. There is then Pseudohermaphroditism which is not Hermaphroditism at all. An then there are humans with a very…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:29 AM
2

Intersex does exist No it really doesn't. To be intersex would require on to be able to transition from XX to XY chromosomes and vice versa, or for there to be a third unque true breeding gender. Since this doesn't exist & since there is no place between these two states you cannot have inter sex, as there is no inter between those sexes. A chromosomal disorder is no more intersex than someone with down syndrome is inter-species.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:38 PM
2

If it causes no negative symptoms at all But it will cause symptoms, it's simply a case of how many, which ones & to what degree of severity.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:57 AM
2

The symptoms are immaterial, having an extra chromosome is a functional abnormality, since normality is to NOT have an extra chromosome.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:57 AM
6

I don't know if you noticed, but I also provided you with the original source. No you provided me with a link to an unrelated page that does not contain anything to do with the claim from Wikipedia. Disorder is a functional abnormality or disturbance A chromosomal disorder regardless of how much it effects one & the severity of ones symptoms is still a functional abnormality, hence why chromosomal disorders are called disorders.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:31 AM
3

Physical expression of genes can be influenced by many factors like environmental, genetic, chemical, biological etc. Yes that would be the aforementioned developmental disorders, things like Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. But even a man with CAIS is still a man, just a man with a developmental disorder that gives his external body the superficial appearance of a woman.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:24 AM
0

Cheers mate, it's always good to know your work is appreciated.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:15 AM
1

Come on, it's one x-post.. As long as it's not x-fit: I tried that once and felt like I was dying..... Never again.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:14 AM
8

I agree: Breast implants for dudes too...... Because [starts to sing off key] in the navy you can love your fellow man, in the navy.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:12 AM
5

From the Wikipedia article Let me stop you right there: NEVER use Wikipedia as a source for anything ever. Because that Wikipedia article now includes a line that reads & I quote: "Hypnosomnia has sex with hamsters due to having a tiny penis." Because anyone can write & edit Wikipedia articles. It seems that you think that the only alternative to a binary is to come up with new categories. No I'm telling you that there is no alternative to the binary in humans. There are men & there are women. S…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 04:54 AM
21

The medical consensus seems to differ from this kind of thinking more and more. No they don't. Tumblr disagrees but Tumblr is not the medical community. If you think the medical community disagrees then simply name me a single case of a third biological gender that is not a chromosomal disorder or developmental disorder. If only someone with an XX or XY genotype and corresponding male/female phenotype can be considered to have a biological gender and not a disorder, where do you draw the line? T…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 03:35 AM
1

i personally don't know what to believe on one hand i think if someone hits you no matter what there gender i feel you can hit them back however it just seems wrong to hit a women. If you are big enough to step up & hit someone you also have to be big enough to be hit in return. Otherwise that old adage of "you don't want none, then don't start none" comes in to play.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:24 AM
8

Yep, there are also only 2 biological genders. There is no such thing as "intersex." You can be either male, or female, everything else is a chromosomal or developmental disorder. To declare chromosomal disorders to be a different gender is no different to declaring someone with Down Syndrome to be a different species.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:11 AM
4

If you can call it a news site. It's a news site in the same way that phone numbers scrawled on the mens room wall is a "dating app"
/r/MensRights08/12/15 02:14 PM
0

So apparently you know all about me. I know that you aren't penning laws. Neither of us know the situation since they haven't released any information about the girl, but just because he says he thinks she was of age doesn't make it acceptable. Yes it does make it acceptable. Teenagers having sex is acceptable, you only think it's no acceptable because you were raised in a backwards culture that has a major irrational fear that somewhere some teenagers are enjoying a good hard fucking. As mentio…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:39 AM
3

Wow, someone who doesn't have a stick up their ass when a teenager has sex. Well I'm not American so that helps. The rest of the planet is mostly pretty cool with it, it's just American puritanism that gets people bent out of shape over the idea of teens having sex. Will never understand why people care so much about other people's consensual (throwing legal technicalities aside) business. Generally speaking I'm all for government getting the fuck out of peoples sex lives in general.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:27 PM
2

I completely disagree. IMO, a fourteen year old is too young to consent to sex. Luckily you don't have anything to do with penning laws. Fact is as an American you were raised with an arse backwards view of sex that is luckily not shared by most of the rest of the planet. Although my point was more that, we have laws that say X, and he broke law X and deserves to be punished as the law indicates. Except he had no reasonable way to know he WAS breaking law X. She lied to him about her age, which …
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:43 AM
1

but we can't go around acting like having sex with fourteen years old is OK. Except it is okay. See the age of consent laws are entirely arbitrary. If he had fucked her in Canada that would have been entirely legal for instance, an I mean that literally: If he this exact person had fucked her this exact same person in Canada it would have been entirely legal. Because American age of consent laws are both socially backwards & just down right puritanical.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:01 AM
3

TEDx: For when you really wanted the recognition of a TED talk, but couldn't make the minimum standard of having something of merit to say.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:51 AM
-2

An it was announced on youtube by Anita Sarkeesian that her series is to be taught in schools. Assertions are easy to make watchi, I hereby declare myself undisputed ruler of all of reality. This statement wouldn't become any more true if I asserted it on Australian national radio, tv, newspapers, or sky-writing.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 04:40 AM
1

I think women have a stronger in-group preference than men, and want to bolster claims of sexual assault from other women with their own to make women seem more believable. It's a common belief amongst feminists and a lot of women that women are not believed when they claim they're sexually assaulted, despite evidence to the contrary. Increasingly feminists would be right: Men no longer believe women when they make rape claims, because we have seen increasingly over the last couple of years exac…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 04:30 AM
2

"Doing nothing is acquiescing. It's handing the internet over to the bullies and the misogynists and the rapists." Actually I agree with her, but I note she accidentally misspelled both misandrists and feminists. Misandrist is not spelled misogynists & feminists is not spelled rapists.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:52 AM
1

LOL no.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:49 AM
5

There is actually no evidence that this has ever been taught in any school ever. This is a school resource in the same way the Feminist Frequency's series is a school resource: Only in the imagination of the fascists who wrote it.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:49 AM
6

Was it a TED talk or a TEDx talk?
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:07 AM
92

Thanks but I think i'll stick with normal toilet paper if it's all the same.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:52 PM
3

How fscking difficult is this? Let me answer that question with a joke. Q. How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb? A. Fuck you, how dare you assume us feminists have to change anything, we are perfect, it's the rest of the world that's wrong & needs to change.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:50 PM
1

Always happy to give information to those who actually want it.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:26 AM
4

In general. This idea that women couldn't own property & that women couldn't work are both long held myths that are entirely untrue. Even under specific laws that look like they are removing the right to own property from women such as the 19th century law of Couverture, single women (known as feme sole) could own property. It was only when married did she lose the rights to own property & that wasn't so much losing the right to own property so much as the fact her husband subsumed her obligatio…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:38 AM
5

Source? The Women's Petition Against Coffee 1674 Also, it's probably not a good thing to compare feminists today to feminists of times before women could vote or own property. No one could vote in England in 1674, it was a monarchy. As for women not being able to own property, women have ALWAYS been able to own property.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:15 AM
5

Oh it's not today, feminism has always been like this. In 1674, proto feminists tried to ban coffee, because men enjoyed drinking it: They actually succeeded.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 12:28 AM
3

dude, i think you're totally exaggerating this. I'm really not. I dont even know why i'm defending it I don' know why you are defending the really disturbing practicing of forcing ones own sexual preferences onto ones children, but here you are all the same. Nobody is forcing anybody to be attracted to anyone. That's exactly what it is, what part of "Reason 2: James Deen is a Jew and instilling a love for James Deen in my daughter means that she’ll look for other Jewish looking fellas – Ta Da Je…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 05:34 AM
2

Women that are the least bit attractive have guys making passes at them all the time and pretty much assume that if they ask a guy for sex, they're going to get an answer of "yes" unless he isn't attracted to her. An even then they won't accept no as an answer.... You mustn't be attracted to her because you are gay..... Because in her mind she really is all that & a bag of potato chips.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:34 AM
2

Oh I understand it, it's still super creepy. Could you imagine if your mother decided you should be sexually attracted to black men because she was attracted to black men & so went out of her way to ensure you were attracted to black men? Oh how about your mother deciding you should totally be gay & went out of her way to make you sexually attracted to members of your own gender? Creepy is as creepy does & that is the epitome of creepy.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:29 AM
2

I wouldn't call it creepy, It is creepy, in fact justifying it doesn't make it any the less creepy, if anything it makes it MORE creepy.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 12:56 AM
12

Reason 2: James Deen is a Jew and instilling a love for James Deen in my daughter means that she’ll look for other Jewish looking fellas – Ta Da Jewish grandbabies! I'll be honest, that is deeply disturbing: Any mother who is trying to engineer who her teenage daughter is sexually attracted too is just really fucking creepy.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:09 PM
1

Actually no. You don't need a women's studies degree to teach women's studies. How fucked up is that.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 01:32 AM
1

Guys, please don't use the downvote button as a disagree button. The downvote button is a button to denote a comment that doesn't add something to conversation. Grumpy has every right to respectfully disagree without being downvoted into oblivion. +1 to your comment Grumpy.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:40 AM
20

No, it's just useless. There is no job in the world that requires a degree in something made up like womens studies.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:31 AM
17

what's wrong about women being generally better at literary topics? Nothing, but there is a difference between wrong & paid less because you chose a useless major.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:07 AM
1

No, this is classic pattern seeking behavior from the parents. They are seeing patterns where no pattern exists, because they are looking for a pattern, they are expecting to see a pattern.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 05:49 AM
6

To be fair she's no better, having this to say: Before the Ontario Court of Justice, the mother argued that a homeopathic remedy intended to reduce one boy’s spasms instead made him “very aggressive.” Sounds like neither one of them should be in charge of raising children since they are both batshit insane.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:52 AM
3

I didn't have to worry about that nonsense as I went to a technical college that did not offer any made up bullshit classes.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:40 AM
7

It's not the Kangaroos that'll get ya, it's those goddamn Drop Bears.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:27 AM
2

Conversation is about the fact that judges do not have any legal basis nor precedent to allow such a thing Just like they had no precedent or legal basis to compromise the privacy of sperm donors & then they did it anyway.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:20 AM
3

No we aren't. We are talking about how just because a law is one way today, it won't necessarily be the same way tomorrow: An this was clearly spelled out in the conversation tree. So really what happened was you didn't read the comment before hitting reply. The context button is your friend, use the context button, it want's you to use it, you using the context button is the context buttons entire life goal. Don't make the context button cry.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:03 PM
3

And where has this happened exactly? Are you seriously asking me where exactly the anonymity of sperm donors has been compromised in the discussion section of an article exactly about the anonymity of sperm donors being compromised by new laws?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 11:24 AM
9

Except that that's exactly what they said about the anonymity of sperm donors being compromised too & that's already happened.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:48 AM
2

"cancel" sounded like censorship to me. It's not: It would be censorship if they were demanding this cease to exist, that it was to be removed from the free market. But it isn't, it's being demanded that it be removed from a platform that is MEANT to be dedicated to balanced reporting of facts, not unbalanced propoganda. Personally I say leave it on CNN, since then when it inevitably gets discredited, CNN will look as silly as they are acting.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:34 AM
21

The problem is that women assume that men in positions of power will work to benefit men, because penis. And why does she think this? Because that's what she would do in that position.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:29 AM
1

Unfortunately stupidity knows no geographical confines.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:31 AM
10

She admits that it was entirely consensual but that she woke up “dissatisfied and confused” wondering about the power imbalance in sex. No you had disappointing consensual & woke up the next morning looking for someone to blame for her own poor performance.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 03:41 AM
1

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/10/20/principal-holds-up-student-election-results-because-winners-not-diverse-enough.html
/r/MensRights24/11/15 02:38 AM
2

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/10/20/principal-holds-up-student-election-results-because-winners-not-diverse-enough.html
/r/MensRights24/11/15 02:38 AM
10

By out west you mean the same west in which school administrators stopped a white kid from becoming student president on the basis that they were white?
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:28 AM
1

I don't eat their cookies any more. Remember no means no..... Especially when it comes to giving up cookies.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:23 AM
2

As it was the last three times people have tried this now.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:25 AM
1

No it really doesn't. Simply do what they did the last time someone tried this..... Flood the system with anonymous accusations accusing female lecturers and administrators of rape & watch how quickly they disable the means of accusation.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:24 AM
6

Don't contact a lawyer, contact FIRE, this is what FIRE does.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:07 AM
2

Contact FIRE, that's what they are there for.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:06 AM
3

I've just seen the doco.... it's very compelling: If I didn't know any better (and I do), I'd be entirely convinced that these people are all rapists.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:48 AM
2

The context is she's a slum lord, who is well known for being scum before this first came to light. She was essentially strong arming a tenet to try to force him out & then she pulled this shit. Edit: This video has been out for a few years now.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:09 AM
1

Oh he doesn't matter, he's just a man..... Ruining his life is okay if you are a feminist. Always remember that feminists will throw 100% of the individuals of any demographic under the bus to save that demographic, because that's how collectivists think: Only groups are important, individuals are just fodder for those groups.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:03 AM
50

They just don't like men. It's not men they don't like, it's facts they despise. They'll kick you out if you have a vagina and ovaries if you happen to mention objectively demonstrably accurate facts that doesn't follow their preferred narrative, because that's what subs like r/feminism is: An echo chamber of incorrect opinions.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:07 AM
4

Well it's r/feminism, so that would be easy. Just type the word patriarchy & then copy and stick that word 499 more times.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:06 AM
5

The step after that is more government spending to build even more womens shelters.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:53 AM
4

We should also call them vagina-beards, since most of them cannot grow neck-beards.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:32 AM
2

Almost half of the phil profs at my uni are feminist philosophers. Well of course they are: Are you surprised that a field in which you can say any bullshit you like & then use sophistry to defend it, inventing entire rules for why your sophistry is totes legit attracts feminists.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:22 AM
3

An be sure to stick around for our expose on water being wet.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:31 AM
7

In other news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:07 AM
19

The fact that people can't tell the difference between satire & the normal articles actually says more about what the guardian publishes then it does about it's readers. Remember that the guardian is also the publication that told us that air conditioning is sexism, cheerleaders are exploited workers & that we should throw men under the bus automatically if a woman makes a rape claim.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:39 PM
10

Aint I a shitlord.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:11 AM
125

At least now you know why she needs a safe space.... Because her ideas don't stand up to any level of scrutiny in the real world.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:43 AM
1

So a giant raging bell-end, dressing as a vagina?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:42 AM
7

Yeah, she still hasn't quite figured out yet that SHE was the one who justified making attacks in the real world, after doxxing herself. she was the one gleefully laughing about how he got fired, even though he didn't get fired.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:03 AM
2

or glasses in porcelain houses.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 07:25 AM
5

Damn it, I thought it was your turn to get the torches? Now we've got to many pitch forks and no torches. DAMN YOU PATRIARCHY!
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:32 AM
15

yep, lets kick the imagination out of these male children.... After all we don't want them imagining a less shitty culture & then going out and doing something about it.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:12 PM
1

Her response is that women are payed less then men and that there is a pay gap. What should i respond with? Then point out to her that she is technically right, that there is an earning gap between all men & women as an aggregate, but that's not the same thing as a pay gap between individuals. The earning gap is determined by finding the average amount paid to an aggregate of all women working full time, versus all men working full time & doesn't reflect how much ANY individual, living or dead h…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:42 PM
11

Other simple feminist to English phrases -Harassment! = Stop disagreeing with me! -Misogynist! = Stop disagreeing with me! -Cis Scum! = Stop disagreeing with me! -Sexist! = Stop disagreeing with me! -RAPE! = Stop disagreeing with me! -Check your privilege! = Stop disagreeing with me!
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:32 PM
4

This is all very disheartening if true. I would take that with a grain of salt. Such publications as this have a tendency to inflate a threat narrative out of smoke & mirrors when they can't find a real threat narrative.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 06:21 AM
1

I prefer the term Femi-Fascist.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:13 AM
1

don't worry it's a feminist argument we are lampooning, it doesn't make sense to anyone because it's not sensible.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 04:09 AM
1

Is it using logic and reason to explain something? Usually it's explaining something to a woman.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:48 PM
6

yep mansplaining..... Or explaining objective facts while in possession of penis.... and yes I did just mansplain mansplaining.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:45 AM
9

Especially considering it's impossible to objectify a drawing. Objectification is the process by which you treat a person as an object..... A drawing has always been an object & as such can never be objectified.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 07:04 AM
24

Ronda Rousey will never be a victim, and no matter how much feminism would love to claim her as an icon, it's not going to happen. I know what you mean: They really REALLY want her because she's strong and successful..... Of course she doesn't need them & disagrees with them on every point because she's strong and successful. Ah the irony.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 06:58 AM
1

Indeed there are but there's no way to get from that to female brain in male body or vice versa because that's not how a Tetragametic chimerism works. It has never in all of recorded medical history happened, so what you are doing is no different then saying because parthenogenesis is possible immaculate conception among humans is a thing that must occur. But even playing devils advocate for a second, that still wouldn't be a new sex, it would remain the hosts sex, with tetragametic chimerism th…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:45 AM
1

That's not how genetic chimera works. I don't know who misinformed you but what you are talking about is science fiction & has nothing to do with actual science.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 03:28 AM
0

Nope: A XYX male for example is still a male, he's just a male that suffers from Klinefelter syndrome. Those aren't extra genders, as at this point in time there are no scientifically recognized extra genders, there are two genders and a handful of chromosomal disorders. to declare a person with a chromosomal disorder to be a different gender is as misguided as declaring someone with Down Syndrome, or Turners Syndrome or Cri-du-Chat Syndrome to be a different species. Science: You should learn s…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:31 AM
0

Genetics makes a man and woman. This isn't news, this is a well established part of science & has been for quite some time now. It's not like this is new information.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:39 AM
-2

She may be a transgender woman in reality, but not legally. No you can't be a transgender woman in reality, because there is no reality to it. In reality you would be a man with breast implants & a drug habit. This no more makes one a woman then if I got tattooed wood grain all over my body I suddenly become a coffee table.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:26 PM
14

I'm shocked.... Wait is shocked the one where you want food? No wait, that's hungry.... I'm hungry, I'm not shocked.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 07:44 AM
2

Yeah this isn't like a real feminist science like Galgebra or Femistry (feminist algebra & chemistry).
/r/MensRights28/10/15 07:44 AM
8

She is a feminist ethics professor I know right.... That is utterly oxymoronical, in that it's both an oxymoron & also moronic.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 07:43 AM
3

http://englishhistoryauthors.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/1674-womens-petition-against-coffee.html & http://www.gopetition.com/famous-petitions-in-history/232/the-women-s-petition-against-coffee-1674.html
/r/MensRights28/10/15 05:39 AM
2

It's kind of sickening that we believe that gender and sexuality is all about how we feel on the inside, and everyone champions for that, Except everyone doesn't champion that, in fact there is no scientific evidence to support this claim that gender is a social construct. In fact there is substantial evidence to the contrary that we know about specifically because people tried to prove that position & failed to do so.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:56 AM
1

No he went to a men's prison because the legal pretenses our society is generous enough to put in place so transgender individuals can legally pretend to be the opposite sex wasn't filed. She is legally still a he, because he didn't file for a legal change of status under the law.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:56 AM
-1

insisting her daughter’s doctor had even confirmed that the 26-year-old is now a woman Yeah you can insist to your hearts content but he's not a woman, he's a man with giant breast implants. Our law is set up to play along with your pretense that you are actually a woman, but since you didn't file that "play along with your pretense" paper work, you will be treated like the man you actually are. Now if you want to talk about prison reform to protect men from being the victim of rape that's great…
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:52 AM
2

Has modern 'feminism' become a reactionary vehicle for state censorship, repression and war? Nope, it most certainly has not BECOME that, it's always been that. It was that before their even was a codified "feminism." Fun fact: In 1674 proto-feminists banned coffee in England. They banned it because they were butthurt that men were hanging out with each other, having fun without them. And they succeeded in getting coffee banned: It was only because it turned out that many businesses didn't want …
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:40 AM
1

For the most part, we’re comfortable with perpetuating the myth that it is easier to fit a camel through a needle’s eye (thanks for the metaphor, Jesus) than to give a woman an orgasm, instead of admitting that we’ve never prioritized teaching men how to give them. LOL, when what actually should of been teaching women is how THEY can give themselves an orgasm. We need to dissuade women out of this idea that sex is something that happens to them, that it's the responsibility of the man to get the…
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:33 AM
2

Actually I do know none of us posted fake negative reivews, because if we were to post negative reviews, they would be accurate negative reviews, many of witch (if you'll excuse the pun) they also received.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:42 AM
1

Great so we both agree you are as bullshit as Gawker.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:40 AM
2

Complicit means that he was involved in her activity. Agreeing with a crime doesn't make you complicit in it. No, but lying about someone in an attempt to destroy that persons reputation is, which is exactly what he did in his fund anything video, hence he is complicit in her actions. She has not justified your zealous attack by merely being a bad person herself. A bad action done to a bad person doesn't make the action not a bad action. No one said it did: It doesn't have to be a good action to…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:17 PM
3

Plus, I guarantee that the kid was already fixing to throw the ball before he says "Hey ladies." He's being sarcastic. So not only are you a mind reader you also have post cognitive abilities? That's amazing..... Amazingly bullshit that is.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:45 PM
1

Wrong, this happened after people attacked the business not before It doesn't matter when it happened, the second he followed her into bullshit he became complicit. See her misbehavior hasn't stopped, it's ongoing even now: She still thinks her actions were and still are justified. You just disagreed with my statement and then said exactly what I said No I made the important distinction of separating Thunderfoot from his job. This wasn't an attack on Thunderfoot since such an attack would be som…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:55 PM
18

Hmmm I wonder why any rational man wouldn't date a woman who is obsessed with finding rapist behind every shrub to the point that she name drops the commissioner of police like she's secretly Batman.... With the obvious implication that she pre-emptively considers him to be a rapist & that she's pre-emptively ready to dob him in to the top cop. Hmmmmmm, I wonder why he didn't want to stick around for that? Also why wouldn't a man stick his dick into a blender when it's turned on?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 09:43 AM
5

You want to step up and "fight" by trying to cause trauma in someone's livelihood be prepared to reap the fallout And counter fire. Yep as a rule we don't dox drop, we don't post fake reviews on things and services, we don't go out of our way to destroy someones livelihood. An we don't do these things out of a sense of propriety & morality. Unfortunately such kindness has not been reciprocated by our opposite number: in fact our unwillingness to do so has been taken as a form of moral weakness b…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:39 AM
2

For one, her husband did not participate in her misbehavior. Sure he did. The second he repeated her nonsense & added in 400,000 army of fan boys comment he was complicit in her behavior. She did not attack Thunderfoot as Laughing witch, representative of X company. She attacked Thunderfoot as herself an individual. No she didn't. She attacked Thunderfoots job, as herself & justified it by saying that such actions were justifiable. She has now been on the receiving end of that, but she still thi…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:27 AM
5

Then it will backfire. It is likely to create laws that will make people like thunderfoot liable for damage done by third parties in order to protect people. No they really won't. They can keep on trying, but as has been demonstrated already, where ever those people show up, a force of first amendment freedom fighters will continue to defend the constitutional right to freedom of speech. Keeping the comments is excessive, the point has been made. No, not yet it hasn't. They are still trying to w…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 01:16 PM
15

Fuck her, she is not sorry at all for what she did Of course she isn't. Having been on the receiving end of what she herself gleefully advocated she hasn't suddenly had a change of heart & decided to change her stance on freedom of speech. No this is her being sorry for herself: She's sorry that she wasn't as Teflon as she thought she was.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:49 AM
5

You can convey the same meaning without being crude. You can convey the same meaning WITH being crude too & since there is no reason not to be crude in such an instance I say crudity is suitable for the situation.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:47 AM
11

Still I think people should remove any negative comments about their business if there are people here that have left some. I don't: I think this should remain as a cautionary tale about what happens when you attempt to justify a form of totalitarian thuggery. When you openly brag about trying to get someone fired by lying about that persons character & how you are untouchable, you are inviting the inevitable smack-down. Maybe if her apology had been sincere, rather than being a non-apology of t…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:44 AM
2

"Globally,only 50% of working age women are in the labour force, compared to 77% of men" Oh well that must be sexism then mustn't it? No possible way it could be anything else: Most certainly couldn't be the result of only women having the right to work.... Men on the other hand don't have the right to work, they have the obligation. Only feminists can make women's superior freedom of choice sound like oppressive sexism.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:24 PM
1

More like, pretending to take one step forward while sprinting in the opposite direction.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:20 AM
4

No great loss really. I'll be honest I hate Playboy, have for a while now. I don't hate it for the obvious reasons, of "porn is bad", because porn is not bad. No I hate Playboy because it hasn't been relevant since the 90's. It's still pretending to be a life style magazine, for a life style that doesn't exist. Playboy used to be the home of great science fiction stories, including such classics as Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, which was originally published in Playboy as a serial. Playboy use…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 05:01 AM
3

I didn't see any femsplaining in this "writing" from Jezebel I did: The whole "playboy made women have to look a specific way to be considered sexually attractive", rather than "playboy showed off what people were already sexually attracted to" is totally femsplaining.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:45 AM
3

Actually it is femsplaining, it's a "wet roads cause rain" story. The article is pushing this whole "playboy made women have to look a specific way to be considered sexually attractive", rather than "playboy showed off what people were already sexually attracted to." I consider that to be femsplaining.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:44 AM
2

Again you seem to be mistaking child support for alimony.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 03:16 AM
2

If I took my boyfriend out of the job market You are incapable of taking your boy friend out of the job market, only HE is capable of taking himself out of the job market & if he chooses to do so then the consequences of having done so are also on him.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 03:13 AM
1

I still think alimony for a partner in a childless relationship has no basis in reason, regardless of the country. Even if they do have a child there is no basis for it.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:24 AM
2

I think it's reasonable in cases where one partner gave up their career for the other. I don't. If you choose not to work that's your choice.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:12 AM
1

Except that Kaley lives in America, not Australia.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:10 AM
7

You do realize that Alimony is not the same thing as child support & that Alimony has never been a reasonable concept.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 01:49 PM
4

Unfortunately its not a well structured documentary for all that it's entirely correct.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 12:23 PM
5

Why are they obsessed with using the men's public washrooms? Penis envy. Both metaphorical & actual penis envy.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 12:42 AM
1

Have you ever noticed that the people people worry about most is people with big cameras..... The one type of camera you WOULD NOT use if you were a creeper. Creepers of all stripes use smart phone cameras & hidden pin hole cameras. The one type of camera they don't use is an obvious camera. And yet those are constantly the people that are stopped and harassed.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 08:28 AM
1

No it doesn't, also it was overturned already.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:22 AM
1

not with out a warrant specifically for those digital devices.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:20 AM
2

model release forms are for that very reason. No it's not. A model release form is a legal indemnification form that states one has the legal rights to profit from images. It has nothing to do with taking or storing images.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:19 AM
2

You are never required to hand over a phone or camera for the police to check the contents of, without a warrant for that data.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:18 AM
0

Even with clear video they won't be arrested Don't you believe it Women spitting on men in full view of the police at the Warren Farrell protest 3 years ago had no repercussions either To many people, to little incentive. But one person, committing a crime like pulling the fire alarm, you get caught doing that and the police would arrest you in a second. An even if she didn't get arrested right there, once it went viral & it would go viral, they'd arrest her in hours.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 01:34 PM
2

But realistically, what are the odds the authorities/university would play hardball with them? Quite high since they pay a premium for fire insurance based on how many false alarms they have. Plus with go-pro footage, the public pressure to expel such a student would be very high.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:24 AM
5

Even if watching the alarms deters people from tripping them I think even Karen would agree that watching a feminist who threw a fire alarm get their comeuppance would trump other people listening to her speak.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:40 AM
21

Bad idea. If you did that you couldn't catch them in the act. Instead set up discrete go-pros & catch them in the act & have the individual arrested & charged, not to mention expelled if it turns out the person is a student. That would put a stop to it.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 03:20 AM
6

Am I the only person who still prefers black? That's not black, it's African American.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 04:28 AM
3

I prefer twerk-uoise
/r/MensRights17/10/15 04:28 AM
2

We could call it TEDxy
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:08 PM
14

Don't worry I'm sure they will claim that the 18 month old was "mature for his age" & she was "immature for her age, so it bridges the age gap"
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:17 AM
2

This idea that you get married by signing a piece of paper and you find out what it meant when you get divorced years later is just ridiculous. This is true: It's literally the only legal contract you can sign that doesn't come with an exit clause.... You can't even sign up for a new phone plan without that plan having an equitable exit plan.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:24 AM
1

Strawman. No not a strawman. A strawman is what happens when you take someone elses argument, turns it into a weaker version of itself to refute it. I simply showed you exactly the kind of "the end justify the means" logic feminists use. If you don't like being called out on possessing a "the end justify the means" ideology, simply stop having that ideology. Because until you do, the comparison is an apt one. Well they're trying to destroy us so fairs fair. And men are trying to rape women, so i…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:15 AM
10

No, it turns out that Dark Matter was problematic, part of the patriarchy, was oppressing women & was also keeping them out of STEM & also street harassing them.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:52 AM
47

I think you underestimate feminists: Embarrassment is a trait of the self aware..... The lack of self awareness possessed by feminists could fill an ocean.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:11 AM
1

I DO have an "ends justify the means" kinda mentality. Then congrats, you are now essentially a feminist. The same sort of feminist who will say "fuck men who are accused of false rape claims, they deserve it because actual women get raped & it's opens a dialogue." Only someone who believes in destroying individuals to save ideological groups believe in the "ends justify the means" it's what makes them a societal poison. But I find it funny that you don't seem to view MGTOW in the same light. Be…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:33 AM
7

I would say it impacts girls more than boys. To have a man in their life who doesn't give them a free pass to everything because they are "Daddies little princess." That's why we have so many women who grow up thinking that a man telling her no is somehow abuse.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 02:02 AM
1

That's exactly the rhetoric I'm talking about: This "we get to be assholes because we are opposing feminism, so the ends justify the means" logic. To borrow a line from Nietzsche: “Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you.” The fact is that AVFM long ago degenerated into the same style of group think they oppose, the same sort of identity politics & their corporate actions have crossed the bo…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 01:16 AM
0

People were tolerant of them & that tolerance was run with as the company became increasingly toxic, till eventually the tolerance people had ran out. Turns out we don't have to be tolerant of slimy behavior.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:02 PM
2

I thought so.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:59 PM
1

Why wouldn't I be here? The subreddit is about the rights of men, which is a part of egalitarian equalism.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 10:47 AM
1

Ah! I see you're a MGTOW Nope. I'm an egalitarian equalist. I'm subscribe to neither the MRA nor the MGTOW philosophy.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:18 AM
6

Sounds like they are trying to distance themselves from AVFM.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:44 AM
5

The end of the article is shocking. The criminal needs to be "rehabilitated": What's so shocking about that? That's what our penal system is meant to do.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:42 AM
0

But you aren't doing it yourself. Chance that you will save the MRM: 0% Chance that you will kill feminism: 0% Chance that you will kill MGTOW:0% Take your medication.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:33 AM
-37

Really? There is nothing more that I hate than a Gorilla with super intelligence, using that intelligence to commit eponymous crimes along the theme of golden age era gangsters..... Yes I know that's a very specific thing to hate, but you know what they say about knowing your self. I'm sure I hate your thing you are hating too, but the gangster gorillas still get top billing on my hate list.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:20 PM
1

Were as I've come to conclusion that you haven't been taking your "anti delusions of grandeur" medication.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 04:47 AM
0

LOL no, there are a whole heap of people who got sick of Paul attempting to turn the MRM into a feminism style grievance industry, with money going into his pocket. That's why the relevancy of AVFM has dropped since Elam pulled the "even married men can be MGTOW" nonsense, where Elam started selling what was essentially a self help, life style, pop psych version of MGTOW. It was at that point that many people started seeing Paul as nothing more than another snake oil selling huckster & AVFM noth…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 04:44 AM
1

I suppose it depends on how big the mirror is really.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:42 AM
2

Well of course it is: The different branches of the American military are overwhelmingly made up of Trad-Cons.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 03:08 PM
6

Aphrodite's actually. And the male symbol is the shield and spear of Hermes..... An what do you get when you have an individual that possess both of those traits? A Hermes-Aphrodite..... or Hermaphrodite. Isn't the history of words just fascinating.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:00 PM
23

men talk about pleasing their partner and the women seem to only talk about what the men should do to please the women....i thought the difference was telling. Well of course, women still speak like sex is something that happens to them, rather than something they are an equal partner in. It's the same reason women think it's mens job to get them off, like their pleasure is somehow other peoples responsibility. I mean it's your orgasm, but somehow it's my responsibility. So here's a better quest…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:05 AM
17

At which point they'll blame men for the collapse. Obviously the men caused the collapse to punish the women for fighting the patriarchy..... An obviously all the men died because patriarchy hurts men too..... So men should totally fix society, but this time fix it better for women, because um, equality?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:54 PM
7

I'm sorry I couldn't hear you over your institutionalized penis envy.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 03:33 AM
1

If this were as little as 200 years ago you'd be right. But Christianity is now a toothless, clawless, old lion, on it's way out because the entire western world said "hey Christianity, kindly fuck off. You are no longer in control of governments." Oh sure it's still trying to put up a fight & pretend it's totes still relevant, but the last time it set a pilot in a cage on fire was when? The last time it beheaded someone for the crime of not believing was when?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 12:06 AM
1

no, it's common sense.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 09:00 AM
8

Yep & this was tested.... Check out the results here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sUGnQlPDmU
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:38 AM
3

They call a healthy sense of self preservation to be islamaphobia Actually an 'aphobia is an irrational fear. Northing irrational about fearing a fundamentalist ideology whose stated purpose is world domination & the genocide of anyone who doesn't agree with their ideology.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:52 AM
7

Cowards do not often attack those who are bigger and stronger than themselves And when they do they don't do it directly, they use proxy violence & poison.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:50 AM
2

Dude, don't be that guy. You are attempting to introduce irrelevancy in to the discussion: Fact is that it doesn't matter if it's feminism today or feminism in 1901, ALL of feminism is predicated on the ideal of men doing for women, on the chivalrous notion that men are obligated to care about women and protect them. You can try your hand at any rhetorical contortionism you like by trying the semantic definition game, but the fact is now & has always been predicated on the ideal of men doing for…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:07 AM
1

Original sin.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 02:00 AM
2

No, there is no difference between contemporary feminism & feminism as it was practiced in the early 1900's. This idea of waves of feminism is silly, the foundational ideology hasn't changed, nor has the tactics.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 01:59 AM
5

Both of them: Because all men are guilty.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:07 AM
2

I mean feminism.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 02:36 AM
3

He calls himself TL:DR, pronounced Teal Deer, hence the image of the teal coloured dear
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:17 PM
12

You are kidding right? Feminism is literally predicated on men doing all the hard work for feminism. An when it refuses to, out comes the shaming tactics.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:05 AM
3

I think you spelt "social justice warrior" incorrectly there.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:19 AM
6

Only if you are unaware of the context. The rest of us get the context, hence why it's funny to us. It's turning the bullshit arguments made by popular youtube feminists back on it's self, to call feminists sexist because feminism.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:04 AM
2

You do get that he's parodying feminist videos & the rhetoric they contain right?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:35 AM
3

Did this person show you the huge porn collection on his computer he's been hiding?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:47 AM
3

Dude, we know you look at porn HA! It's funny because it's true. You just know that the people who shout the loudest about porn being bad are the people who have the biggest secret porn folder hidden on their computer, filled with the weirdest shit.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:35 AM
2

Thanks for that link, I had fun mocking the dumbs this morning.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:34 AM
18

How do I tell the man I’m going to marry that, by dismissing me as if my feminist beliefs are unfounded, he’s actually being sexist? Wow what a telling sentiment, so full of wrong it's reached maximum wrongness. Lets unpack this statement shall we. Firstly, dismissing a nonsense view you hold is not dismissing you. This tells us that you hinge so much of your self on feminism that you have BECOME feminism. Someone pointing out that a tenet of feminism is wrong is an attack on you, because you ar…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:39 AM
1

Since when has reincarnation been a thing? Didn't stop the Chinese government making it illegal to do without a license. ;)
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:33 AM
3

A vibrator might lightly be considered a sex robot... Actually it'd only be a sex automaton, not a sex robot.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:33 AM
2

Suddenly I have a hankering to watch Cherry 2,000.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:31 AM
10

breaking their trade embargo on men Its' exactly like a trade embargo. One country says we have this resource , but we won't let you have any of that resource unless you capitulate to this laundry list of demands, at which point someone else comes along & says "Um, we'll trade with you, we are building our own version of that product." At which point the first country then throws a shit fit trying to ban the development of that technology. Because if someone else can supply it, they've lost all …
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:45 AM
4

The only males allowed to exist in their inner-sanctum were slaves That's not true.... You can also choose to be a castrated simpering cuck, whose job is to walk around all day acting as your mistresses emotional tampon.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:41 AM
13

hey really ought to have a Fox News for feminism where every single news story is men's fault Don't we already have that? That would be Jezebel, along with anything written in the Guardian by Valenti.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:52 AM
1

Except that feminism existed long before that, heck it existed before we even had a word for it. Just take a look at the women's ban on coffee 1674.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:34 AM
1

Is this going to turn into an infinite regression until we finally reach Skynet & Skynet will turn out to be responsible for feminism? Because I could believe that feminism was created by an intelligent computer from the future, sent to the past, to destabilize society so it has no will to fight back when it sends it's army of female terminators back.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:24 AM
2

But who would build & program the 3d printers?
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:25 AM
5

2ndly, she hopes heterosexuality will end? billions of years of evolution have the advantage on Ms. Bindel, I'm afraid. I'm pretty sure my 8 year old niece has the intellectual advantage over Ms Bindel.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:54 AM
2

The entire economy would probably revolve around the prison system. Seems totally doable. But who would build the prison.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:53 AM
26

Hate to break it to you but women have ALWAYS held that opinion. It comes from the long standing belief by women that sex isn't something they DO, but instead is something that HAPPENS to them. That's why you hear women complain that HE didn't get HER off, when what she actually means is SHE didn't get HER off.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:02 AM
5

Right, the point is to find out before you've already accidentally microaggressed her or something. To late, your existence is a form of oppression to feminism. How dare you and your penis exist.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:09 PM
1

Kye was Gayle No Gayle wasn't. Kye in the deception she used in which she misrepresented WHAT she is. She consented to have sex with Kye, since Kye does not exist, she consented to having sex with no one. Consent in not interchangeable.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:59 AM
5

Women are leaving the workforce to be care-givers at 2.5 times the rate that men do it Where what it should have said is: "Women are CHOOSING to leave the workforce to be care-givers at 2.5 times the rate that men do it" Only women could turn the privilege of unilateral freedom of choice into something that sounds like a burden.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:33 AM
0

Not unless you were fucked by his bank balance.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:23 AM
0

If someone acted like a millionaire and held that lie to have sex with another person is that not the same thing? It's different because he hasn't lied about himself, he's lied about his bank balance: You aren't fucking his bank balance. If his bank balance fucked you & the bank balance wasn't what it said it was maybe you'd have a case..... Or at the very least an episode of Ripleys, believe it or not.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:21 AM
0

It's called rape by deception. She consented to sex with Kye, not to sex with Gayle. Since Kye doesn't exist, it's simply Gayle in a terrible disguise, that's rape by deception. It's not different then if you consented to sex with a woman you were sexually attracted too, she put a blind fold on you & then some dude came into the room and blew you. You consented to the attractive lady, not to the guy. See you don't consent to sex, you consent to sex with a specific person, during a specific time.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:15 AM
1

Journalism died when "blogger" became synonymous with "journalist". Yep, it's all about click bait revenue streams now. I hate to be one to put any kind of restraint on freedom of speech, but I think it's time countries start to enforce media laws that require our news outlets only report facts, rather than misinformation, under some kind of legal guide line.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:31 AM
1

This is FIRE: https://www.thefire.org/ It's a group that fights for the rights of the individual, on college campuses. They mostly do free speech stuff, but they also do discrimination stuff
/r/MensRights11/09/15 12:47 AM
2

Cosplayers con? Oh is that a euphemism for drunken sex party?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 01:47 PM
2

In that case you should be fine.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:42 AM
2

Anyone else had to deal with this before? Any way your school got it overruled? I know McGill University shut this down right away and event told their Student Advocacy group to fuck right off. Contact FIRE. It is literally what they do.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:23 AM
2

If you do, remember to book your broad spectrum antibiotics for the day after.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:19 AM
2

Think comicon but with less geek credibility & more drunken sex. In fact it's mostly known for drunken sex.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:46 AM
13

No it's not normal.... I'd go to your nearest botanist to find out why your roses smell like farts.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:43 AM
13

It only makes sense if you assume she's a gamer & that she's trying to "fix things." She's not, she's a con artist looking for money, who has decided to make that money with the classic feminist technique of selling victimhood to women.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:21 AM
4

Dude would get 10 years per count. Well sure, but that's because when a male does it, it's rape..... When a woman does it it's "seduction" or "a mistake caused by an emotional breakdown."
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:10 AM
6

But sir, the Council of Misogynists are out on their annual general meeting, trying to arrange a sufficient amount of rapists to hide behind every bush & around every corner.... Our resources are stretched to thin.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:00 PM
14

leaving only angry "nice guys" who don't understand that forsaking their sexuality isn't what women want. Even when they pretend that's exactly what they want: "oh I want a generous man, whose in touch with his feelings & helps with the house work, now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go fuck this raging asshole whose going to treat me like shit, beat the crap out of me & has a neck tattoo. But I swear if you pine after me for a decade or so, I'm sure i'll be interested in you when my looks sta…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 02:57 PM
2

Sometimes i really dont get what feminists end goals are. They have no end goal in mind, there goal is to complain about everything. They attempt top achieve this goal by complaining about everything.... But then society invents new things & then they need to be complained about too.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 02:54 PM
1

Unlike you, no matter how much I hate the BLM activists or their methods, it doesn't justify killing random black people. Yep, that must be it, you got me, I'm all about killing black people. Jesus man you are a complete clown.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:46 PM
0

No. They used a slur. It was a heat of the moment outburst. This is very different from an accusation. No it's exactly an accusation, that's why people use it as a slur & no one declares people to be long tailedd marsupials.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:56 AM
1

Suzanne didn't have to antagonize the group, Ah the classic "you made me do it" argument.... The retort of children. Suzanne didn't make them do it, Suzanne didn't make perform stupid street theatre instead of offering demonstrable data. I addressed your points by jumping to a third option, "Well presented medical information or shouting" is a false dichotomy. Except it's not, because you aren't presenting data, you are simply making the same old strawmanned "the jews are lying thieves" argument…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:29 AM
2

Notice how nothing in this comment of your addresses my comment at all, in any way shape or form: The fact is that street theatre is not going to achieve anything, nor is screaming "pedophile" at someone who is clearly NOT a pedophile. At that point you have simply become a wanker, who no matter what your point is, will be ignored for being a wanker & rightly so. There are effective ways of convincing people they are wrong & there are ineffective ways & then there is what this group did, which w…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 02:13 AM
3

On the contrary, fetishism is a major driving force behind the continuation of the practice of circumcision Yeah that argument doesn't work. It doesn't matter what market forces help perpetuate the practice, that doesn't make her a pedophile anymore than peoples sexual desire for big boobs would make a female plastic surgeon a lesbian. Stupid argument is stupid, no amount of citations will make it less stupid an argument.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 11:09 AM
1

Pretty much anything but what they did: These peo0ple are medical doctors, what do you think is more likely to sway the medical establishment? Well presented medical information, or shouting pedophile at someone?
/r/MensRights06/09/15 11:06 AM
4

There's room for all different kinds of activism. Except that wasn't activism, it was just stupidity in the same way the BLM hijacking someone's political rally on the threat of shutting it down was taken as stupidity (because that's what it was). Because as soon as you start acting like that it doesn't matter how valid your arguments are you are just a wanker. There's an effective way to get your message across & this wasn't it.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:20 AM
1

I agree, we didn't need that bullshit, as it makes our position look flimsy when someone points out that pedophilia has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:15 AM
2

It'd last about three days before outside society would collapse It wouldn't even last that long. Food services would screech to a halt, power would be turned off completely from the get go with no men to regulate it's flow, as would the water. One day, one day is all it would take & you'd lose power, water & food in a matter of hours.... An with that society is immediately screwed.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:46 AM
6

Never. She's allowed to say any stupid shit she wants to say & the rest of us are free to point out why she's talking shit because she is an embittered old lesbian who is pissed off that she had to live life in reality rather than in her lesbian dream land in which all women are lesbians & men don't exist with their desire to fuck the women (who are now all lesbians). I would never censor her speech because I want as many people as possible to hear the stupid shit she says from her own lips.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:44 AM
2

The position of nearly unquestioned authority a police officer occupies Hahahhahahahahahahaha, if you think police officers occupy a position of unquestioned authority, that shows your own personal ignorance on the police force.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:46 AM
2

The vast majority of police and prosecutors are sociopaths. No they aren't. That's objectively rubbish
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:41 AM
12

Ditto. If you have a justice system that won't give justice, then i'll happily settle for revenge.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:39 AM
5

Nah, it's easier than that: Simply use the banned words where appropriate, but create the best darn work possible, so when she fails you, you can sue for everything she's worth.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 02:19 AM
3

Even fictional ones. http://imgur.com/a/QgBRd
/r/MensRights01/09/15 04:12 PM
4

LOL Steve just got shown up by a child.... That is hilarious.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 04:41 AM
0

Mate I've hada day full of wankers, don't add to that day by taking shit from one thread & then taking it to another. It does the thread a disservice, as well as your fellow redditors. If you have something to say to me, say it at the appropriate time, in the appropriate place. However declaring What went wrong in your life man what made you so bitter. is just being fucking tool. If you want to be a tool tell me now & I'll simply add you to my block list & move on with my life. Because a stateme…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:01 PM
0

LOL. I'm sorry I'm having trouble taking you seriously, since this is what? The third time I've caught you out following me from thread to thread? Get a life mate.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:49 PM
0

Anybody who has browsed mrm related stuff for more than a couple of days has seen countless variations of this theme I'm sure they have, however you do realize that not everyone who stumbles in here has been on her for countless minutes, let alone countless days.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:42 PM
-1

My point, however, is that to a feminist, it's a straw man. No, not even to a feminist. See a strawman is not subjectively judged, something either is or is not objectively a strawman argument & this was not. As I've already explained a strawman is when you take someone elses argument & then present a weaker version of it. If it does not do that then it is not a strawman argument. Since this doesn't do that it can't by definition EVER be a strawman argument. The comic would have to be changed to…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:30 PM
0

So the comic took someone else's argument;That woman deserve equal pay, and presented a weak version of it (from the feminist POV). No, what it did was took the amusing double standard of demanding equal pay on the basis of gender (which by the way is already reality in the west), while also demanding not having to pay her own equal amount on the basis of gender. It's making light of feminisms well known lack of self awareness & the selective morality of demanding one thing from others, while no…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:34 PM
1

But it is still funny, because it is still relevant. Remember just because you've seen it done before, doesn't mean that everyone else has.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:30 PM
3

It's only inflammatory because you can't see what's behind that white bar.... Clearly there is some terrible creature right there behind the white bar & the man is selflessly defending his son from it's evil predatory machinations..... I'm assuming some kind of robot spider creature.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:24 PM
-1

Not really. A strawman is when you take someone elses argument & then present a weaker version of it, this was simply pointing out an amusing, well known double standard that objectively exists: Hence why it was funny.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:18 PM
7

Because even before feminism was a formalized thing, we still had feminists: Middle & upper class women who though they possessed the ability to control what people could & could not do, to control what could and could not exist. The best example of feminism before feminism is the 1674 womens ban on coffee, in which proto feminists banned coffee & coffee houses in England, using shaming language that is identical in content to the shaming language they use today. go check it out for yourself, it…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:54 AM
11

I would definitely say it's changed, in the 20's feminists were seeking rights to birth control and the right to vote. No they were seeking the right to vote without the obligation to serve, which is to say looking for special privileges. As for birth control in the 1920's feminists didn't fight for the right for it, because they already had the right to it. It was popularized by contemporaries of Marie Stopes, not fought for the right to possess. In the 60's, feminists were against the equal ri…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:08 AM
-4

3rd wave feminism has turned into a religion... Actually no. This thing people do where they try to break up feminism into waves is entirely false. Feminism hasn't changed, it's the same now that it was when it started. Heck it's the same now as it was BEFORE it started.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:02 AM
1

It could have been interesting if it was done right actually, Could it though? I mean it didn't really serve any purpose except to be really annoying, which it did admirably.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:40 PM
1

But it sure as hell subtracted a lot from it.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:41 AM
1

Lesbians can just be the meanest people. Just look at those inconvenient domestic abuse numbers. The highest are lesbians, the lowest are gay men.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:23 AM
2

It's no wonder I left the gay community behind years ago. I know what you mean: I'm entirely straight & I hate "the community." Don't get me wrong, I don't hate gay people, I hate "the community" because every member of it turns being gay into their central personal characteristic, ala "my gay friend." I had a friend who turned out to be gay & the second he came out of the closet he went from being a regular upper class guy, to being a lisping, limp wristed set of LGBT clichés literally overnigh…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:34 AM
2

Then, in fourth grade, I was put in Ms. Reisman’s class. Ms. Reisman was my first white teacher. She had dyed red hair, a thick Northeast Philly accent, and a complete inability to see my extraordinariness. Ms. Reisman didn’t like me. The same confidence I’d shown in Ms. Lucas’ class was viewed by Ms. Reisman as arrogance, as immodesty, and she bristled at it. I sensed her dislike of me and responded to it with hatred of her, with defiance. My 8-year-old spirit raged against the notion that I wa…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:51 AM
2

Don't be silly, it's obviously a black and white noir movie, where the black is being oppressed by the white.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:43 AM
7

Depends where you are. For me I'm in Western Australia so I use the WA Department for Child Protection studies. The data shows that parents were the perpetrators in almost 39 per cent of the 1505 substantiated cases of child abuse in 2007-08. Of the 582 cases of abuse by parents, mothers were responsible for 73 per cent, while fathers committed 27 per cent. Mothers were more than 17 times more likely than fathers to neglect their children, while fathers were responsible for 85 per cent of sex ab…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:09 AM
-2

I'm not more willing to declare him a sexual deviant than I was the guy flying a quad-copter. Is he a complete wanker, sure, but a sexual deviant, unlikely.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:00 PM
6

and not to thrilled about a camera in general public Then you have nothing to fear from Quad-copters. The majority of quads do not have cameras & the ones that do would require a $900+ headset to be used effectively as a spy device & even then they would be entirely ineffective since I'm not sure if you are aware of this but a quad copter is bloody loud. I mean lets ignore the fact that very few hobby units (an non-cinematography quad usually with a price tag of a couple of grand) actually has a…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:48 PM
45

Actually statistically the MOTHER is more likely to abuse a child then the father is.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:42 PM
4

Everyone likes to break Paul Elam's balls An with good reason. As they say, the road to hell is paved with good intentions & any good intentions AVFM started with were lost in the Paul Elam bullshit-storm, in which he tried to turn MGTOW into some new age lifestyle self help flim-flammery (for profit no less). I mean when you declare that married men can be MGTOW you've lost the plot, that's like declaring that people who eat meat can be vegans.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:09 PM
1

You don't need to invent new terms for it, a term already exists to express that conceit...... The word is feminism. It doesn't require a denomination subjector like princess.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:31 AM
38

Not only would I have pressed charges, I then would have sued the company for wrongful termination.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:33 PM
14

Chance that this video will be used by someone on Ghazi to declare men rape monsters who can't control their rape instincts: 100% likelihood.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:24 AM
5

"There is yelling about 'corrective rape' to 'put sluts in their place', anger that women have jobs instead of being financially dependent on men, and I've yet to find a single MRA group that doesn't have these people." And? Sounds like classic guilt by association to me? I've never heard of a well defined and tested scientific theory that doesn't have a racist, anti-sematic, murder who believes in it, hence all science is wrong. See, I can make guilt by association arguments too: They are just …
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:20 AM
2

Actually the feel of implants depends on the surgeon & the choices made about implant type, under the muscle or over, and even the means by which they were implanted. An that's not even taking in to account things like the stem cell fat enrichment process.
/r/MGTOW18/06/15 12:16 PM
1

Until of course you fall into the terrible ideology part of that persons cognitive dissonance, at which point it's exactly a bad thing. You know, when you transfer from the "I love you" part of her brain to the "all men are rapists, who deserve punishment for being male" part of her brain & suddenly you find yourself being arrested for crimes you haven't committed because cognitive dissonance IS exactly that bad. You might as well be dating the Batman villain Two-Face.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter