TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

maxhrlw Archive

View 3 posts and 317 comments by maxhrlw on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
76

Feminismmaxhrlw/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:45 PM
10

Healthmaxhrlw/r/MensRights07/02/24 03:29 AM
2

maxhrlw/r/askTRP07/02/17 05:23 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

The bit you don't get is that in the traditionalist world view, you don't need to be rich to provide for your family. A basic profession used to be able to support 3 kids and wife comfortably. Feminism is a pervasive force which ruined this for us, and you are mindlessly playing into their hands.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 12:09 PM
1

Yeah the a lot of social structure causing this which has been exacerbated by feminist discourse. That said, you can't completely ignore the biological imperatives though. Human sexual selection is primarily intra-sexual between men, and inter-sexual for women. I.e. men are genetically pre-programmed to compete with each other for the affections of women.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 10:52 PM
2

homeless woman That's if he can even find one..
/r/MensRights20/03/25 10:47 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 09:13 AM
7

Depend is probably a strong word, no? This also seems like the equivalent to a feminist take on gender issues. Yes it disproportionately affects men, because men disproportionately undertake the affected activities. This comes down to choice. Completely ignores the reasons behind the issue, in order to self victimize.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 11:51 PM
6

More deflective nonsense. I have a partner, fortunately she doesn't walk around with a victim complex, desperately trying to project her insecurities onto others.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 10:56 PM
6

You have no examples, or objective input, just relying purely on an ideological perspective. I get it, when you are entrenched in an ideology, it's easy to believe that the messaging is unassailable fact.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 10:52 PM
1

I think the vast majority of men have been sexually assaulted actually. the question is about men who have, I don't think it is actually, it's about men's lack of empathy for each other and their general perception of this issue. surely you can at least imagine that would be at least hard to experience and could leave aftereffects to said men Yes and I have a lot of sympathy for those men. because I don't know if you have been thru that. I have and I've detailed my experiences on another comment…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 09:09 PM
10

Not really sure what you mean. The idea that men are more easily aroused (due to testosterone levels) and such arousal is heavily based on visual stimulation is a biological reality. The notion that this natural process is called "objectification" is a feminist theory and entirely imaginary.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 08:04 PM
1

Maybe not always, but much more frequently than women. I don't claim to be an expert, but my limited understanding of how testosterone works explains a lot..
/r/MensRights18/03/25 07:59 PM
0

This is so bizarre, because you're talking about having empathy and not speaking for other men, whilst trying to lecture me about my own experiences.. because they don't align with your opinions.. "Most women are affected differently than most men." is simply not true. If you can't accept that men and women are fundementally different and process things differently, you are just as bad as the feminists you loathe.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 07:55 PM
1

If it were different we wouldn't be having this conversation.. the general attitude is "don't be a pussy" when it happens to a guy, other guys shrug it off as no big deal. I'm trying to explain why I think that is. If you are challenging the notion that other men feel and behave that way, you'll have to ask someone else.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 07:50 PM
1

It's the entire premise of the question..
/r/MensRights18/03/25 06:00 PM
1

It's the entire premise of the question..
/r/MensRights18/03/25 06:00 PM
1

It's the entire premise of the question..
/r/MensRights18/03/25 06:00 PM
1

It's the entire premise of the question..
/r/MensRights18/03/25 06:00 PM
15

Because it's a concept made up by a few feminists who can't even agree amongst themselves over its correct usage, to describe normal and nuanced human/social behavior. So male visual stimulation and appreciation of the female body certainly exists. The notion that this inherent reality is "objectification" and fundamentally a negative thing is simply absurd.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 08:31 AM
2

Shit that sounds like a dark situation. You need some bros around you. Tried support groups? DnD and other in person gaming type activities are good if you aren't into more traditional male pursuits..! Trust me there are guys out there who'll have your back..! I'll grab a beer with you on the very slim chance that you live in Auckland..?!
/r/MensRights18/03/25 05:02 AM
-2

You're getting things twisted. It's not about assuming others "sensibilities" or how all men feel about a particularl subject. It's providing an answer to the question posed. I’m certainly not burying any trauma. It literally didn’t affect me. I’m happy and successful and have a brilliant family and fulfilling relationship. Linking this to suicide rates is pretty disengenuous and somewhat disrespectful in all honesty. Of course there is variance on an individual level, but you have to look at ge…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 04:41 AM
25

They aren't opposed to it, because they can exploit lonely men for easy cash, all the while using it as an example of how shitty men are. It's a perfect feminist vehicle.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 04:15 AM
23

Don't play the feminists game. Nobody is being "objectified", the concept is nonsense. I see more and more posts like this. Using feminist language and talking points and being reactionary, "well it affects men too". No it doesn't, because it doesn't exist. Don't give their imaginary concepts a second thought, because then you legitimise them.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 04:13 AM
-2

I still don't think you understand. They are my thoughts. Based on my experience. 1st time I was 16 and this girl I wasn't particularly interested in got me super wasted, got me alone in a room and started trying to ride me. It didn't really work, so she tried to spread a rumour around school that my dick was too small to fuck her .. 2nd time I was early 20s, passed out at a rave after-party and some chick decided she wanted to suck me off in a room full of people. Other than that I've been grop…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 04:00 AM
-3

women rape men is plying them with alcohol or drugs to the point he cannot ward her off. I know, it's happened to me. Twice. You didn't respond to my words though and went off on a random tangent in complete opposition of what I actually said.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 03:31 AM
-5

We don't find it traumatic. Some do. Most don't.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 03:27 AM
-16

Because most of us don't have a trauma response to it. It's as simple as that. You aren't helpless and being overpowered by a much physically stronger person. It should be treated the same in the eyes of the law. But in terms of empathy, most men just don't see the harm it's caused and as such don't offer much sympathy. Different if it's a kid and the power dynamic does exist.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 01:57 AM
13

I'm ugly Doesn't matter, one of my best mates looks like Rango and he's dated some absolute stunners. Confidence and the gym were his allies. ugly girls used me to get themselves laid What does this mean? I ended up contracting ED You can't contract ED..
/r/MensRights17/03/25 08:38 PM
6

You're making quite a few mental gymnastics here That doesn't even make literal sense. So not sure what you are trying to say. this post has nothing to do with men's right. Most of the content on this sub has nothing to do with men's rights.. this post is directly responding to the comments about male loneliness and the "unfair" dynamics of tinder. classic tradcon trope about social media being bad Social media is bad. Anything that has the potential to be so addictive that people use it to repl…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 01:40 AM
8

why are men still overwhelmingly in leadership positions in business and politics? https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Mean-Big-Five-scores-broken-down-by-age-and-gender-with-fit-curves-from-the-regression_fig1_10751413 Contrary to popular belief, divergence in typical personality traits between genders is very much established science. The least empathetic and the most disagreeable people make the best CEOs, in terms of the metrics we measure success by (profitability). So whilst men and women …
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:50 PM
13

A lot of these cases have multiple accusers. Some people are genuine. Others just regret decisions they made in the past, and believing that they lacked agency is a coping strategy for them. And some just see it as an opportunity to make some money. It's nearly impossible to distinguish which one is which, especially when so long ago in the past. Sometimes people genuinely believe a completely fabricated version of events that they have conjured in their own mind. You then add to this the alread…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:18 PM
12

You can tell immediately by the hostile response that you are suffering from most of the things outlined above.. Everything doesn't have to be politicized. The role dopamine plays in reinforcing addictive behaviors is pretty well established, as is social media's reliance on it. It's obviously harmful if you overdo it, and the vast majority of the "incel" community massively overdo it. A huge amount of the posts on this page are members of that community complaining about lack of female attentio…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 10:35 PM
1

It's deeply ingrained biological response, due to female pregnancy. It's present in plenty of other species, so the idea that it's just a social norm is actually the 'nonsense.' Go read some actual scientific literature instead of gender studies faux intellectual gibberish and then come back.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 06:50 PM
4

I'd be cancelled before I even started haha. Thing is, it's not a strict formula. Just some fundamental ways of behaving, normally what feels natural. It's about de-programming the feminist indoctrination. What they think they want isn't what they actually want, and being a 'nice guy' who does whatever they say is a one way street to divorce. But, it's not about some red pill keep em mean keep em keen thing, acting like a dick head. You've still got to be respectful and treat them well. Look aft…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 06:26 AM
5

I suggest you re-read the literature. Do the math, based on randomly selecting one male and one female per 100 people, how likely the male is to be the more aggressive one, as a percentage. Then come back. Also this isn't a problem, it's biology.. edit: I'm also not sure if you are intentionally misrepresenting this, or you don't fully understand it, but any given metric can be slight as well as significant those two words aren't mutually exclusive and relate to different things. Similarly you c…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 01:29 AM
3

Other men wasn't the topic of discussion. Stop looking for ways to be offended. You're the one who's inferring meaning. I'm certainly not embarrassed by effectively applying psychological principals to improve my life and those around me. Neither should you. The young fella who was asking for the advice will benefit from it. You can just ignore it. The key there is 'male dominated industry' do you think men are treated fairly and well in female dominated industries? Maybe it's something to do wi…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 01:24 AM
7

The way you phrased it as ‘they eventually start to behave properly’ is just dehumanising and rude. There are plenty of men who don't behave properly as well. I'm sorry if you find that dehumanizing and rude. Setting boundaries and not putting up with irrational shitty behavior is something everyone should do. It happens to be a particularly effective way of dealing with neurotic women. Feminism is good, it’s when it’s taken too far that it becomes an issue It has already been taken too far, tha…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 12:53 AM
12

It's as simple as I mentioned above. Say it's crazy talk, say clearly and objectively what you don't agree with. Don't get drawn into a prolonged discussion about it. Don't get angry, don't raise your voice, but don't give in. The pattern is always the same, the first time they will have a tantrum, get heated, maybe call you names. Then treat you with the cold shoulder for a while. Stay firm though. They'll usually come back and apologize. Next time will be the same, but probably more restrained…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 09:31 PM
14

> No, they don’t. Sadly some do but most are rational. The vast majority of men and women have been exposed to relentless and insidious feminist propaganda. So yes, they do on some level. Sounds like you do as well. > Are you talking about a woman or a dog? They’re a person, stop treating them like they aren’t. I’m all for men’s rights and women’s rights, and you’re talking like men’s rights should come first. Nope. Men and Women are different. If you want success in life, you have to face this,…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 09:20 PM
18

Most women like to feel looked after and protected. They like to have an emotionally stable man who they can unload all of their worries and problems onto and who will be their rock. They like a man who takes charge, is spontaneous, has a plan. I.e. Come home from work .. "I've found this incredible little restaurant, tucked away down a cute little cobble street. Get yourself ready, I'm taking you there." Instead of "what would you like for dinner, we'll do whatever you want". In my experience, …
/r/MensRights12/03/25 09:07 PM
22

Yeah if they're already talking that online before you've even met, they're beyond salvaging. So block and move on was your best choice there. Just in terms of broader advice though, they've all been brainwashed to think like that on some level, but it is actually quite easy to shut it down in the normal ones (not the ones you'll find on reddit shouting about it). Most men have also been brainwashed to believing that shit too, and then they act on it pandering to their woman's every irrational w…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 08:27 PM
47

The thing is they can't resist their biology, no matter how hard they try. Every woman has this nonsense in their head nowadays. When you date them, you set your boundaries, you don't get emotional and lower yourself to their level debating it. They eventually start to behave properly. It's really easy, yet somehow most men never learn it.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 08:19 PM
1

No, because shockingly, men and women are different and behave differently. Stop listening to the feminists.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 07:12 PM
18

Stop using feminist language, you'll never beat them at their own game, it's rigged. It isn't privilege, it's biology. Human sexual selection is predominantly reliant on male intra-sexual and female inter-sexual processes. I.e. we compete with each other and they choose. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352250X1500189X
/r/MensRights12/03/25 06:32 PM
0

Yeah, your problem is the fear. Which is also kind of a class thing. Unfortunately there will always be bullies. You have to stand up for yourself. It's not about size or strength, the bullies rely on your fear to dominate you. Realize you aren't made of glass, and you won't break when you get into a physical confrontation.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:41 AM
6

Pretty sure being autistic would make you medically ineligible already. If you have a shutdown/meltdown on the battlefield it's not going to end well for those around you.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 02:05 AM
0

Women are turned off by whining weaklings, which is what most male feminists are. There are also a lot of men like that who aren't feminists.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 11:47 PM
3

Another would be that there are no meaningful differences in personality traits between men and women. There are and these differences go a long way toward explaining the choices men and women make on an individual level. Those choices then explain societal level differences which the feminists disengenuously lable sexism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51594567_Gender_Differences_in_Personality_across_the_Ten_Aspects_of_the_Big_Five Even when these discrepancies are acknowledged, the …
/r/MensRights11/03/25 11:43 PM
8

The gender pay gap is probably the most obvious. Men and women are not paid differently for the same work. They are paid differently for different work. Which is completely logical..
/r/MensRights11/03/25 11:40 PM
2

Yes! This is the main danger of a lot of thinking I see on this page. It's reactionary, and accepts the lies peddled that men and women are the same. Masculinity is something to embrace and be proud of.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 12:00 AM
1

potentially sexist Agree, potentially not inherently as you initially surmised. men do NOT have more of the “extreme qualities” desirable in leaders that you mention. You've misunderstood, and actually I would encourage you to look at the research. Men are over represented at the extremes when it comes to distribution in certain qualities.. for example agreeableness. empirical evidence https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Overlapping-distributions-of-Agreeableness-for-men-and-women-Vertical-axis-…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:45 AM
1

I don't think there's anything inherently anti-woman about that.. Comes back to the personality bell curve. When it comes to traits that make good leaders; agreeableness, assertiveness, decisiveness etc. The average man or woman is inseparable, but when you go to the extreme permutations of these qualities it is almost exclusively men or exclusively women at each end. Take IQ tests as another example. The average score for a man or woman is pretty much the same, however if you look to the top 1%…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 03:40 AM
1

It's sort of the natural progression of any pseudo-political ideology. Once someone is entrenched in it, they are never going to stop and think that's it we've done enough and abandon that way of thinking. That's why feminism just keeps reinventing itself with new 'waves'. A lot of the men's rights movement is just as bad. It becomes an echo chamber of malcontent. Like the people mindlessly downvoting your perfectly reasonable observations.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:43 PM
4

That's correct, but the problem is its based on the principal that women are always the ones at a disadvantage, even in areas where this is no longer the case (or sometimes never was). And so it pushes for women to be equal, but falsely believes men are already ahead and therefore need no advocacy.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 05:15 AM
1

That's because most nurses are female..
/r/MensRights09/03/25 12:58 AM
3

It's ridiculous to suggest that all gender norms are socialized. It's not about the barbie doll, it's about HOW the kids play with the barbie doll. You only have to watch really young kids for a few minutes to see the inate differences. That's not to say all men or all women behave the same, and the fact that feminine men are judged poorly by society is certainly problematic.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 07:34 PM
2

Not my experience. Women around me don't come to my face and tell me I'm not a man or whatever. I wouldn't expect they do. They probably will never consider me as a dating option because I'm not masculine enoguh That's the part where they don't respect you. I don't think anyone is trying to do that At my kids school there are posters everywhere saying "boys will be boys" and a big cross through it. Then underneath boys will be kind, boys will be considerate, boys will be respectful, boys will sh…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 10:22 AM
2

Why don't you think that?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 10:05 AM
3

Written by a male feminist.. Of course their are some extreme incredibly misogynistic and dangerous elements. However there is nothing inherently wrong with espousing traditional masculine values. It's tantamount to lumping extremists who hate all men with liberal feminists.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:25 AM
5

Problem is women don't tend to respect men with feminine traits, which is the complete opposite of what they proffess. Then they blame men and 'the patriarchy'. Don't get swept up in that way of thinking. Feminising our son's is NOT the answer..!
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:18 AM
5

Nonsense. Men's right in and of itself is considered to be part of the "manosphere" if you are just talking about prominent figures, there's still a huge range: Jordan Peterson - good guy, may not be right about everything. Promotes traditional masculine values which are often demonized in today's world. Is misrepresented constantly as a misogynist, but bases all his opinions on data and his experience as a clinical psychologist. He understands women's (and men's) drives better than the blue hai…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:15 AM
1

I don't care about younger women. They seem to care a lot about older men though, much to your dismay of course. Doesn't fit into your twisted world view. I’m happily child free, with an exciting, successful ,creative career I worked hard to build Tells me all I need to know. Your weak downtrodden partner obviously isn't enough to make you happy..
/r/MensRights06/03/25 10:23 PM
1

Funny because I'm happily married with 3 kids and lots of friends who are women. Plenty of younger women chasing after me, but I respect my wife far too much to be interested. That's an incel to you, because obviously you only have the one way of viewing the world. Bitter and resentful. I just understand how the world works and made a success out of it. Even when things aren't "fair". You on the other hand refuse to accept it and will remain miserable.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:04 PM
1

More convenient for women actually. Although only attractive ones. The ugly ones sit around complaining. Hierarchy looks something like: Attractive woman Attractive man Ugly man Ugly woman Simple as that. Feminists want to put ugly women on the top, that's what it boils down to.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 06:41 PM
43

It's infuriating to talk to these people, so better off not doing.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:45 AM
1

Or maybe just father's stop circumcising your sons. Ignore the women's opinion on it entirely.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 02:47 AM
1

Yes that's fucked up, but it's a product of a society where being circumcized is normal, not the other way around. Women in Europe don't prefer mutilated men.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 02:11 AM
21

Emasculation.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:35 AM
1

Nonsense, in most other countries it was never commonplace in the first instance. My wife weirdly suggested circumcisng our son because of some weird hygiene myth. She soon changed her tune.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:07 PM
5

If there's a quota, the opportunity isn't equal. What don't you understand?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:04 PM
1

Not sure why you feel the need to be so condescending when it's a demonstrable truth that people ostracize those who are different.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36892895/ You can continue to ignore reality and attempt to patronize me if it makes you feel better about yourself.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 08:16 AM
1

Not my experiences .. my observations. Listening to the stories of others. How I know teenagers and young adults treat each other..
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:19 AM
2

Sad for all men who's parent's perpetuate this babarity based on fitting in and avoiding ridicule. You're very fortunate then, but also very naive if you think your experience is representative of the majority.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:03 AM
2

That's good for you. Most others have a different experience. Being an outlier in any way usually means being targeted in school. Those women are assholes, but they didn't invent circumcision. This is something men do to each other, women often encourage it.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:25 AM
7

Equal employment opportunity is a right. Men don't have that in many companies due to diversity quotas.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:08 AM
1

You know other men in the US bully each other for having a foreskin .. It's pretty fucked up, but not sure how women are to blame..
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:04 AM
7

No, but reproductive agency and employment opportunities are ..!
/r/MensRights05/03/25 12:27 AM
8

Yep this. I downvoted, because the statement was incorrect in my view. I'm not religious. Feminists are not fundamentally against male circumcision, they aren't necessarily for it, they are indifferent. Most of them see it as a way of scoring points, "it's not the same as fgm, it has health benefits" is the common lie. That's doesn't mean that some individual feminists aren't against it. They are just not ideologically opposed in any way, so their identity as a feminist is entirely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 09:49 PM
6

Yeah stuff like this is everywhere. They also seem to love it when a man loses his penis, particularly when a woman does it as revenge. Take this mocking article from top women's publication as an example: https://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/news/a35771/twice-de-peened-man-porn-star/ Imagine if there was an article in some men's mag talking about female sexual trauma with even a hint of the jovial tone used here. It would be cancelled in minutes!
/r/MensRights04/03/25 05:22 AM
2

No it doesn't exist. Masculinity has nothing to do with individuals doing shitty things. Using your own examples.. The belief that women "belong in the kitchen" is arguably toxic, but what does it have to do with masculinity? Even if it were true that someone were being so hyper masculine that they are harming themselves and others, what does it mean to call this toxic other than a co-opted feminist buzzword? If someones joints are ruined from running marathons, do we call that toxic altheticism…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:12 AM
2

Yeah exactly. Because on average there is still a pay gap, the feminists and main stream media still crow about it. All this affirmative action is still going on at the grass roots to remedy the situation but it's already gone too far. By the time this data shown up in aggregate it will already be too late.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 10:07 PM
1

I've read that's the case. Wouldn't put my house on it though. Also just mentioning male health, boy's education, male DV victims etc is in many cases classed as undermining women's health or victimhood. I know, I guess that's my point. Feminists feel the need to criticize and downplay any issue men raise. We can be better.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 10:05 PM
11

You've just extracted the part which I've already acknowledged we agree on.. I don't agree with you that girls do this often to boys and the implication that the reverse isn't equally true. Anyway it seems like quite a purile thing to argue about so let's leave it at that.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:07 AM
7

No, I conceded that your own particular set of circumstances may be less common and perhaps indicative of gendered abuse. I don't agree at all that women abusing men through tickling is any more prevelant than women abusing other women through tickling, or men abusing other men through tickling..
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:53 AM
87

Unfortunately the articles paywalled. But seems to confirm what I've long suspected. There is no pay gap anymore. Even based on disingenuous averages.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:39 AM
12

Na big sister little sister, big brother little brother, big brother little sister, big sister little brother. All permutations happen. It's a playful way of the older sibling asserting their dominance. You're probably correct that the older brother typically has less need to do it to the younger sister, particularly in a situation with a big age gap like yours, as the hierarchy would already typically be well established. But yeah, I'd highly doubt there's enough in this to say it's a type of p…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:36 AM
20

Depends if you want to see it as abuse or not. It's also not a gendered thing. Older siblings do that king of thing to younger ones all the time, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:28 AM
5

Always important to have balance! I would also add - Breast cancer and prostate cancer receive similar funding, but breast cancer typically affects younger women. So I would argue comparatively is underfunded. It's more devastating to lose your wife and mother to your children at 30 than it is to lose your grandfather at 80. Men and women have different issues. It's our job to advocate for men's issues, not undermine women's issues (that's straight out of the feminist playbook).
/r/MensRights03/03/25 03:57 AM
2

I had a girl I wasn't interested in try and force herself on me at a party when I was wasted. Got on top and tried riding me, I wasn't aroused, so it didn't work.. She went round school the next day saying my dick was too small to fuck her..
/r/MensRights03/03/25 01:08 AM
5

Stuff like this is why you need an older sister.. to go and kick the little b*tch straight in the c*nt!
/r/MensRights03/03/25 12:50 AM
3

The whole notion of a "Patriarchy" is bullshit .. the answer isn't a knee jerk response to say no it's a "Matriarchy".. that's just using nonsensical feminist "gender theory" to try and dispove a clearly ludicrous position. Don't be sucked into their game, we can never win that one, they make up the rules as they go. Our systems of organization were/are based on the natural order of our species. Simple as that. That affords different rights/privalages for men vs women. Once you start dismantling…
/r/MensRights02/03/25 09:17 PM
106

Also electrocution isn't what happens during childbirth anyway..! It's a way to make the muscles cramp, but also does other shit.. like electrical burns!
/r/MensRights01/03/25 05:55 AM
3

I know it's bizarre lol, and I'm getting called a virgin for stating a truth anyone would know from experience as well as objective biological fact..
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:40 PM
-1

Yes
/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:39 AM
-8

That's laughable. We both know the reality there..
/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:19 AM
-41

What are you talking about lol. The only way a vagina is ordinarily 'loose' is immediately after some forms of sexual activity, then it goes back to normal pretty quickly. Otherwise refer back to the rest of my post regarding normal variations, and maybe read an anatomy book around the dimensions of a vagina vs a penis and the level of 'elasticity' a vagina can accommodate with an erect penis.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:32 AM
3

Yeah he's written about 5 rambling posts about it. Summary is nobody here agrees with involuntary circumcision, but most point out that energy is best served finding ways to prevent that from happening in the first instance rather than thinking up ways to 'level the playing field with women' and suitable insults accordingly. For some reason that upset him. And now created a fake profile pretending to be someone else.. Dudes got some issues.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:05 AM
-6

What are you talking about..
/r/MensRights27/02/25 11:55 PM
-58

If you're fucking someone too soon after childbirth or straight after they've been gangbanged by a bunch of other dudes.. well that's not really something to brag about.. Otherwise yeah there's some variation, often based on age, and you can definitely tell when you get a chick who has good control of the muscles down there.. but loose.. nah they all do the job.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 11:12 PM
-5

Maybe on some level, but point stands it doesn't have the same effect. If a guy gets rumour spread around school he's got a small dick, it's pretty devestating. Loose pussy..? Never heard it, just instantly dismissed as a nonsense. Always heard guys trying to save face after being accused of having a small dick with the old "its like throwing a sausage down a hallway.." most people just kind of hear it and go hmm yes, that's not really a thing is it, even the biggest ho around doesn't have a 'lo…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 11:04 PM
-10

As usual around here. A lot of these guys are as bad as the feminists. I'll keep speaking the truth though.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:51 PM
1

Far less powerful though. They know that there are simps everywhere desperate for some of their ugV.. I've seen some real butchers windows out their.. guys just don't care. Guys can be set back years when ridiculed over their penis size.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:50 PM
5

It's not even just men below average. It's men who are completely within the average range. A lot of the insecurity is completely self driven. But it's massively encouraged by the dating apps and the women's requirements to that end. Women in real life are generally far less concerned about such things. But unfortunately for young people, so much of their self worth is tied up in their digital world.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:44 PM
6

It's not really a thing though. No woman anywhere has been turned down for sex or laughed at for having an ugly vulva. Guys with small dicks definitely have.. So the insult has no power.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:41 PM
8

Yeah it's not a woman vs man thing. It's a societal thing. Just in the same way women can be the most critical of other women's appearances. The feminists often call this internalized misogyny. That's just absolving ones self of responsibility I believe. The fact is we all need to do better. There's an effort to improve things for women on the body shaming front. Not so much for men. The gender of the person doing the shaming isn't really relevant.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:39 PM
-62

Thing is there isn't really such thing as a "loose vag". And if there is it can be easily remedied. So it's not the same at all. It's a hollow insult with no power.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:36 PM
3

Just take some solice in the fact that society is slightly less anti men than reddit. It's honestly better for your own sanity to keep the redditing to a minimum.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:51 PM
-2

You're lack of punctuation gives you away. Admin, you need to ban this guy's spamming..!
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:45 PM
1

Yep. Sometimes life isn't fair, but playing the victim and blaming 'sexism' instead of looking for the reasons behind things is just weak and disingenuous. It's exactly what the feminists do, and we will never beat them at their own game. Nor should we want to!
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:12 PM
2

Equal opportunity. Not equal outcomes. Men and Women aren't equal, they aren't the same. That's feminist bs.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:06 PM
2

No idea what you just said.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:07 AM
2

What's much worse is when some vengeful spouse chops of a guys dick and they're all still laughing.. Like that's a serious sexual assault, grievous bodily harm and basically ended someone's life.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 09:56 AM
1

That's really not very surprising considering 47% of men under 30 are under 14.. and I would hope are all virgins.. This incel rhetoric is so harmful, we shouldn't give it legitimacy by spreading misleading information like this. The small but rapidly increasing percentage of disaffected young men who suffer from low self esteem and feel rejected by society need lifting up and encouragement. They need strong male role models. The wallowing in self pity and sharing falsehoods only hurts themselve…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 09:45 AM
4

Probably based on what? I knew one guy who was a virgin at 30.. and he was quite happy. The internet isn't the real world.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 09:37 AM
3

It's 2/3rd of the men in this forum..
/r/MensRights27/02/25 09:31 AM
3

That's just regurgitating a nonsense feminist construct. You can do better.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 09:28 AM
1

That's nonsense. See the rest of the world outside of America. If you want to have sex with a guy who can't clean his own dick.. that's more of a you problem..
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:05 AM
3

Like I said you're well within your right to return the favor and plenty of guys do.. Being pro male isn't about a race to the bottom with women whining effeminately about perceived social injustices.. Being pro-male is about celebrating our differences and understanding women have some things better. And we men have some things better. These are natural differences. Men act on things. They don't complain ineffectually. If you care about genital mutilation, campaign to make US men change there m…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:58 AM
-11

Hardly. Bars/clubs are oversubscribed by men. Men don't like it when there's only other men in said bars and clubs. Owners can limit entry by charging additional fees and make more money in the process. If there was a shortage of men in said clubs/bars. Bars would fail commercially. Lack of interest in women's sports means clubs can't pay the same as they do for men's teams. I'm not making a direct comparison. Just pointing out the economic reality, and how the free market dictates the outcome. …
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:37 AM
1

Most of these answer's are very US centric. In most other western countries, if you are in a defacto relationship and particularly if kids are involved it's treated exactly the same as a marriage. Given that fact. My reasoning is, tradition, excuse for a good party, happy wife, no detrimental effects..
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:30 AM
-8

Yep 100% this. Sometimes I think these forums are just a clever feminist rouse. More and more I see guys whining about how they are not being treated "equally" to women. It's because you aren't women you're men! Celebrate that. The moment you engage them on their level with the gender war bullshit, you've already lost. It's only getting harder for young men. The only solution is to embrace your masculinity and fight back when they try to suppress it. Acting like women and feminizing yourselves i…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:31 AM
-53

Not really. It' just supply and demand. Not saying it's fair, but that's what it is. It's the same reason Women athletes don't get paid as much. Crying sexism is ridiculous on both counts!
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:18 AM
4

There's still some women who are weird about it.. but definitely pretty rare.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:10 AM
6

Don't dispute any of that. Just pointing out that you are free to turn down women based on your preference. If enough men felt the same way it would be normalized. Reality is men don't care. Not much point complaining, it's just a societal difference between the sexes. Its ok for there to be differences. We aren't feminists relying on biased BS pseudo-science to assert that there is no difference between men and women. One thing that does need to change in the states is the practice of genital m…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:08 AM
60

It is alright for men to turn down women with large labia. In England we call them beef curtains. It's called personal preference. The fact is most men just don't care. The foreskin thing is an American problem and is deeply socially engrained, it's not a Women vs Men issue. Even (some of) your male doctor's promote it.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:12 AM
0

You say it's not about all Women, but then say "they will betray you, happens always.."
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:07 AM
0

Is this supposed to be satire..
/r/MensRights26/02/25 07:59 PM
4

I saw a guy yesterday say all women are your enemy and will betray you.. There's all kinds of wild generalisations by damaged men on here. It's growing exponentially. It's a shame because it makes us just as bad as the man hate groups on here!
/r/MensRights26/02/25 07:40 PM
3

Yep. It's an incel chamber now pretty much, and most of them don't even contribute to the discourse, just downvote!
/r/MensRights26/02/25 07:38 PM
1

This is more an abuse of power situation, and I'm sure happens to female maids with much creater regularity.. We have to be careful not to try and make ourselves out to be the victim in every situation. Otherwise we lose all credibility and are no better than the feminists..
/r/MensRights26/02/25 01:30 AM
1

The answer as with all of the gender differences lies in the extremes. Women are almost always in the middle of the bell curve. The most violent people are almost exclusively men, but it's a very small number and they commit almost all of the crime. At the other end of the spectrum people with genius level intellect are almost exclusively men. People who are on the extreme spectrum for disagreeableness, risktaking assertiveness, unsociable are almost exclusively men (i.e. qualities that a CEO fo…
/r/MensRights25/02/25 07:15 AM
1

Maybe. But typically it's seen legally as entirely removed. I saw a case in the US whereby the biological 'sperm doner' to a lesbian couple, who remained in the child's life and actively involved in child rearing from day 1, was deemed to not be legally considered a father. If that's the case, its completely backwards to say that a sperm donor has a financial obligation.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 06:29 AM
1

The world is bigger than America remember.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 05:26 AM
20

There is no good argument for why a person cannot contract out of a child support before before the kid is born. Essentially making themself a sperm donor rather than the kids father. My body. My choice. My responsibility.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 05:10 AM
2

Didn't say it wasn't.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 05:00 AM
2

Ridiculous claim..! This kind of nonsense is as bad as the worst feminist dogma. Stop the gender war bullshit. Focus on real issues facing men and what to do about them.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 02:14 AM
4

He's talking about sparring, there is no 'match'. You will regularly be asked to spar the young kids at the gym as well, so they can learn. If you try and decimate them you're just an ahole.. Same sparring women at the gym, if you've ever done it you will see, it's not even close to competitive.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:36 PM
6

We used to have a girls come down to my gym. She was pretty good won most of her bouts. Coach would get her to spar with us guys as there were no other girls at our club. It was like boxing a child.. If you're worried about 'losing' to women at your boxing club, you probably shouldn't even be there. There's no winning in sparring anyway, and you won't be matched competitively with a female..!
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:32 PM
1

Working out how? Indoctrination into deeply flawed ideological concepts. Yes that's worked out incredibly well to the detriment of society. Allowing women to actually enact the ideological nonsense and ignore their biological imperatives? No not worked out at all, complete disaster. It's why they're still complaining about pay gaps and slut shaming.. Do you just want to just be equal and opposite to them? Complaining about things that aren't fair about being a man, inferring that there's nothing…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 10:53 PM
6

The whole feminist gender discourse is ridiculous. They try to make pseudo intellectual arguments against biological imperatives. Yes women's sexuality has value. Men's doesn't. That's because of the inter and intra sexual selection processes in our species. Also observed in many other species. Young men get pissed off because they can't get a match on tinder and feminists get pissed off because there value is linked to their sexuality.. This is called nature and there's absolutely nothing you c…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 07:10 PM
1

On some level I suppose. There's no point arguing against our biological nature though.. This line of reasoning is equivalent to the nonsense pushed out by feminists.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:42 PM
-3

Those are the most important for sure. Also need to look good, smell good and pluck your arsehole..
/r/MensRights19/02/25 07:50 AM
-5

which has now largely been replaced by automation of labor with the onset of industrial revolution of course, so men don’t offer much utility to women anymore, which is why male loneliness is on the rise What kind of faux academic nonsense is this? The industrial revolution began in the 18th Century. One of the main reasons men and in fact all of humanity is becoming lonelier is the replacement of real human interaction with screens. It's particularly bad for men who rely on online dating as it …
/r/MensRights19/02/25 07:49 AM
-25

Women aren’t required to do any of the proletarian tasks you listed for a man to accept them. Of course not, why would they be? Women and men are attracted to different things. I (and any other self respecting man) have my own set of standards for the women I choose. "Be an emotional rock, act like a man"—classic male-shaming rhetoric. Hardly shaming.. it's a call to embrace your masculinity and display it openly. emotional punching bags to absorb their meltdowns. See the point about setting har…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 05:20 AM
-35

Here's the list of how to keep the vast majority of Women happy. It's pretty easy: · Be decisive. · Take charge. · Be spontaneous. · Be independent. · Make them laugh. · Be an emotional rock for them. · Set clear hard boundaries early when they do women shit at you. · Treat them with respect, but f them like a whore. · Act like a man. · Do housework! Can't help you with the attracting them part I'm afraid. I can tell you that even the most unappealing guys out there manage to get a girlfriend. Y…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:48 AM
6

Nobody set it up, it's a system which developed organically due to the natural biological differences between men and women. The system is detrimental to anyone who isn't in a member of the elite social class regardless of gender. The fact that male preponderance to extreme personality traits which are aligned with leadership roles and the fact that women's biology severely limited them from taking part is not evidence of oppression. The only reason any of these conditions have changed is throug…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 04:31 AM
2

Sounds like you're giving yourself excuses to sleep with men, albeit men who fit a very narrow set of characteristics. Just do whatever feels good and makes you happy.
/r/MensRights17/02/25 01:37 AM
1

The way you've framed it sounds pretty reasonable. To me it comes across as far more negative and nihilistic though.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 09:09 PM
1

I think your right on all fronts. Weak men and brainwashed women are not a good combination. The incel thing isn't straightforward in my mind. Society using the term to shame disenfranchised young men is wrong. So are the groups of men who label themselves as such, absolving themselves of any agency in their current plight.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 09:07 PM
-1

Shit dude, that's some hardcore mental gymnastics right there..Just accept that your into tranny's and move on.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 09:03 PM
-3

I get that, but any self respecting man should have that same checklist.. just basic requirements for a well adjusted person. I think you've nailed the problem though, where men have the idea that they need to wait until they graduate until they start dating, this is a pretty new phenomenon, and I believe a result of 'online dating'. That world is a gross distortion of reality, but unfortunately is now crossing over as people internalize and normalize it. Still, average guys and average girls li…
/r/MensRights14/02/25 01:31 AM
-13

I mean let's look at them individually.. Career - essential for your own self fulfilment. You start on that path pretty early on in life anyway. Have a house - a basic human necessity to have a roof over your head. You don't need to own it in this day and age. Have a car - essential and pretty low level of entry, unless you live in Singapore. Most people have some sort of wheels by late teens. Take care of your body - essential for your own well being, eat right and do some excercise, doesn't se…
/r/MensRights13/02/25 11:11 PM
6

Most of the internet including reddit has been corrupted by gender politic pseudo science. In that world there is no such thing as misandry..
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:29 PM
1

This problem is all about dating apps. Get off the apps, it's as simple as that..
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:25 PM
-8

I hope this is ironic. Those things are a pretty basic level of what you should want to achieve for yourself..
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:24 PM
2

If parents bothered to educate themselves, the issues you describe would be gone in a single generation.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 02:10 AM
1

Your wife sounds like a bitch..
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:52 AM
2

I heard a good joke about that once. But essentially only a tiny percentage of women make any money from OF or the like. Most of them end up realising that they've shown the world their fanny for the equivalent of a packet of chewing gum.. and ultimately feel a deep sense of shame..
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:40 AM
2

Good choice!
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:36 AM
-6

This is where the whole incel theory stuff falls down. Women can't be mega sluts banging all the men in the world whilst simultaneously only choosing to sleep with the top 2% or whatever the claim is..
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:03 PM
3

Haha, well put. He also sounds like he'd be better suited to a Nissan March rather than the Ferrari he's eyeing up.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 06:53 PM
12

Good news. There's lots of places on this planet where that's already a thing.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 08:41 AM
16

Sounds like you haven't set your boundaries well enough.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 02:18 AM
-1

You are finding out that the extremists on this side of the fence are just as feral as the feminists they despise. Both parties are impossible to reason with. The sad thing is for the men this extremism is leading to their own downfall..
/r/MensRights10/02/25 01:19 AM
6

Life is suffering! There are a lot of advantages to being a man though. A lot of it is precluded by being in the right headspace. Once you get into a negative thought spiral it's very difficult to pull yourself out of it. Only advice I can give is get off the internet. Get involved in the real world with real people.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:40 AM
1

I was expecting it. That's the problem with echo chambers.. It's important to still try and get the message out though. We have a crisis of masculinity at the moment in the west and wallowing in self pity on the internet only amplifies things. We need to encourage disaffected young men, be positive, and celebrate some of the innate advantages that come with being male.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 12:40 AM
4

The feminist response to "why now?" would be that the system has always been the same, but girls are only just now being allowed to compete on an even footing. Or something along those lines. It's impossible to argue this stuff from an ideological standpoint, and it's also pretty pointless in my mind. Looking at the here and now, boys are struggling, why do we continue to not give this the attention it deserves, feminism is supposed to be about equality isn't it?
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:31 PM
-12

Men are disadvantage in some areas, women in others. Embrace the advantages you have instead of focusing on the disadvantages. Enjoy being strong, decisive, independent and assertive and shape your own little part of the world just how you like it!
/r/MensRights03/02/25 01:23 AM
6

You can do something about everything you've listed there, on a personal level, immediately, and radically change your life..!
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:52 AM
1

Do you mean 'patriarchy' the natural state of governance by which the the vast majority of all human society has organized itself? Or do you mean 'patriarchy' the imaginary zeitgeist whereby men persecute women?
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:48 AM
0

Yeah pretty much agree with everything lolocraft says, except the end advice, the advice bit is dogshit.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:43 AM
-2

Have you ever been to Quatar?
/r/MensRights29/01/25 09:37 AM
2

Agreed, don't think that's a gendered thing though.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 09:01 AM
2

Do you think the attack had any lasting effects on you, if you don't mind talking about i? Almost the exact same thing happened to me, twice. I was super high and went off into a spare room for some air, this chick followed me, I really wasn't into her and she just forced herself onto me, in the end I just gave in. Second one was even worse, I was physically unconscious and a girl put my dick in her mouth, other people were even in the room..! Like you say, other way around and I'd be in prison.…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 09:00 AM
4

I think we need to distinguish between self proclaimed incels who have a radical hate based agenda, and normal but disenfranchised young men. While they all need help and compassion to some degree, it is also imperative that we don't allow the lines to become blurred between some of these individuals and the wider men's rights movement. There is a lot of anti women sentiment and resentment expressed by some of these individuals which is inaccurate and often completely unhinged. It needs to be ca…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 08:35 AM
2

Great point, I completely missed that on first read, which I suppose was the point, intentional obfuscation is a common feminist tactic. So essentially what that statistic suggests is that if men on average live for say 5 years with a debilitating illness, women would on average live for 6.25 years with a debilitating illness. We know that on average women live for 5 years longer than men, so this would mean that they still on average enjoy an additional 3.75 years of good health. That is to ign…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 07:52 AM
1

That's also just cognitive dissonance. They would rather believe in these supposed benefits, because they have a mutilated penis and facing the truth is uncomfortable. It's a natural human response and is why even male medical professionals in the US still promote circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 04:56 AM
1

Well you are either a little naive, or being intentionally obtuse. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and explain. I have at no point called anyone in particular an incel. I don't use the term to shame or insult people who I disagree with as is often the case in the mainstream. I have however made statements about the behaviour of "incels" which I have observed. Now I don't think the notion of "involuntary celebacy" is even a subject worth acknowledging. I don't think good but lonely boys …
/r/MensRights26/01/24 09:02 PM
1

That's manifestly untrue and you know it.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:12 PM
1

Yes please do stay on the sub. I'm constantly being downvoted for making balanced commentary, but what does that really mean in the grand scheme of things? I have 3 young sons all under 5, and I think shutting down a few angry incels is worth the aggro in order to try and progress men's rights in a legitimate manner..! Stick around, those of us who are real appreciate the support!!
/r/MensRights26/01/24 10:42 AM
2

There's no intention to misrepresent. I don't really see much of a functional deference between the definition you've given and the one I used. Let's assume there is though and refer to your definition from here onwards. Obviously if you define toxic masculinity in that way, then it self evidently exists. There are stereotypically masculine behaviours that some people may express by intentionally harming others. This is not the way the term is used by feminists however. First hit on google gives…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:09 AM
20

I think you are largely correct, but there is some nuance to this, and it does differ from the other examples you posted. In those cases the verdict was not guilty by reason of insanity or some jurisdictional variation. Those concerned were also indefinitely committed to a phychiatric hospital (you'd rather be in prison than most of those places). With this case the woman was actually convicted of involuntary manslaughter and her sentence suspended. I think the issue here isn't that the convicti…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:48 AM
2

I'm saying it's not inherently "toxic". It's an evolutionary trait. It can be channelled positively into sport, and is essential for the protection of our loved ones from external threats. Sure, if you want to redifine toxic masculinity to mean "any time a member of either gender expresses a personality trait which is more commonly displayed by males in a toxic way." Then what you are saying makes perfect sense, but we all know that is not how feminists use the term..
/r/MensRights25/01/24 11:47 PM
1

It was you that initially used the word tone, so not sure why you are now saying there isn't a tone.. obviously there is. There is even a link beneath another cosmo article about emasculation which reads "more penis fun". In sure that's still not considered making light of the situation though. Well as long as you are sure. Must just be a coincidence that the "journalist" who's written the article has written several about sexual violence against men. Now there must be a reason that she hasn't w…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 11:30 PM
1

I mean yes, everything you've said is correct, but the original comment I was responding to is not correct. We need to be clear and precise in our discourse and not use hyperbole or misrepresentation. Otherwise we are just as bad as the feminists.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 07:42 PM
1

Ah so now you are acknowledging the tone, but try and brush it off as stylistic. Would they write an article in the same town about a female victim of sexual assault? "How they write articles to appeal to their typical audience" - you're starting to get it, a very popular publication which writes light hearted tongue in cheek articles predominantly directed at women, sees a horrific crime committed against a man as prime content..
/r/MensRights25/01/24 07:26 PM
9

But being physically aggressive isn't a toxic trait of masculinity.. A dickhead channelling his aggression at an innocent bystander makes him a dickhead.. I don't see your point at all.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 06:31 AM
9

Women do do things like that. I've seen it, they often do it in a group as well rather than being lone dickheads. Where is the link to masculinity there..?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 06:06 AM
2

Which specific ancient civilizations or medieval kingdoms are we talking about?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:49 AM
9

It's being taught in schools brainwashing our kids. Women in the mainstream media talk about it all the time. Boys want to wear make-up and dresses like Harry Styles. This doesn't just come from nowhere. Then when they get out into the real world they are going to struggle. The world isn't kind to weak men. This is a real problem.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:33 AM
11

That's got nothing to do with masculinity whatsoever though. That's just a guy as you say being a dick. A woman could quite easily have demonstrated the exact same behaviour.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:27 AM
8

We've gotta be balanced in our criticism or it becomes meaningless. Of course femininity isn't only associated with positive traits. It's associated with gossip, manipulation, weakness, indicisiveness etc. And sure chauvinism existed but so did chivalry. What we are seeing today is a concerted effort to eradicate masculinity entirely and feminise our boys. We need to push back against that absolutely, but resorting to reactionary extremism and hyperbole is a hindrance.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:23 AM
1

It depends if you are talking about America or the actual world.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 03:02 AM
4

Yeah the process is pretty simple. What movies came out this year? Barbie was one, does it get a nod for best picture, well no it was a pretty shallow movie with an uninspired plot. What about best actress? Well Margot Robbie was alright but there were better performances out there by leading ladies. Ok, now onto the best supporting actor oh yeah Ryan Gosling was the one thing everyone was talking about in that movie. Maybe he gets a nomination, which he likely won't actually win. He wasn't chos…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 11:45 PM
2

I think that's certainly part of it. But women are just not logical and are ruled by hormones and emotion. You simply cannot win an argument with most women using logic. You argue with them and they'll end up agreeing with you and arguing the exact opposite position to that which they started with whilst still being angry. But I am absolutely not saying to accept this, everyone keeps getting confused on that part. It's just very easy to deal with once you know how. Set clear boundaries, never tr…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 10:49 PM
1

Incel's will downvote, that doesn't mean everyone who downvotes is an incel. I've never said any blame on women is bad. I said you can't change their nature. You absolutely must not put up with their bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:01 AM
1

Sorry, I'm not sure what your question is?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:39 AM
1

That's the golden question, there seem to be women's groups and men's groups. Neither of which's participant seem to interested in seeing things from the others perspective.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:35 AM
1

Where did I say everyone on this post. If you are part of a community that blames women for all your problems and describe yourself as an incel, then yes i'm calling you an incel. If that doesn't apply to you then i'm not calling you an incel. And you seem bothered..
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:29 AM
1

When you find a way to discuss human behaviour without making generalizations give me a shout..!
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:20 AM
1

No calling yourself an incel is being an incel.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:17 AM
1

Anthropologic generalizations will never apply to every single individual.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:01 AM
6

It's just brainwashing and social conditioning. Feminist rhetoric is so ubiquitous and forced upon the populace from such a young age, it is internalized. However regardless of ideological beliefs it is very difficult to change our nature. The reason they can't evaluate their own reality is down to cognitive dissonance. I.e. they strongly believe in feminist ideals and what they are told they want in a man. When they are faced with conflicting information such as 'I actually like when he tells m…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 02:49 AM
19

There's a subtle difference in the fact that the term "incel" was self ascribed. It's not the successful men or the women who labelled them as such. It is a movement of the disaffected which exists only on the internet and is self affirming and toxic. Nowadays it's used as an insult and used to shame all men who disagree with the mainstream. It's not a real thing though. The problem is that disaffected young men aren't shown help and compassion and as such are forced into the dark recesses of th…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 11:28 PM
4

High end jewellery stores still made obscene profits when women were actually oppressed and unable to work. To be clear, obviously women are no longer oppressed in the western world. I just don't think that this is a particularly good demonstration.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:23 PM
5

If you try and use rationality and logic with the women in your life, you are going to have a very hard time. Of course call them out. Thats the point. It's up to you to set the boundaries. They will never do it by themselves.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:53 PM
1

Yes women try and control you in a relationship, which includes your spending. It's up to you to be firm and stoic in your response. I see more and more men giving in and letting their woman "wear the trousers" and what happens? They spend your money, get bored and cheat on you. Some get divorced and the really unlucky ones get cuckolded. Men complain about women spending on shit all the time, like you somewhat ironically did in your post. Re makeup and plastic surgery. If talking about public c…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:54 PM
-3

You are correct, but again the incels will just downvote you. Mens issues will never get any mainstream recognition when all people want to focus on is woman hating and irrational self pity.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:43 PM
2

Yeah this. We can't blame women for their irrationality, it's just their nature. But we can blame ourselves for allowing that irrationality to control our lives.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:35 PM
5

It's usually trophie wives and those with inherited wealth spending in the ultra high end fashion stores though to be fair.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:30 PM
15

No subterfuge to it, they blatantly believe the same as the feminists. I.e. "the patriarchy" hurts men too..
/r/MensRights23/01/24 03:14 AM
1

Heres a few extracts for you: "He's clearly a div." "Feng did not go and cry and eat ice cream with her best friend, as most people would do." "Snipped off his willy." "He awoke to find himself looking - er, less of a man." "They sewed his penis back on. CLOSE SHAVE, you're all thinking." "Sounds like the punchline to a very bad joke. Which it probably was, for him." "It seems Feng's got a good overhand throw on her." If you can't acknowledge that the above is clearly an example of flippant and …
/r/MensRights22/01/24 09:25 PM
6

You can't say these articles aren't making light of the situation and maintain any form of integrity.. Unless English isn't your first language and you struggle to read the tone, possibly.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:22 PM
1

Agree it sickens me. Bizarrely a lot of other men seemingly take glee in it as well though. Can't understand it.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:16 PM
1

I think that's just a correlation without causation. The clue is in the name re why pop music is more popular in the media, schools, movies etc. You can say this about any genre other than pop and incidentally any genre can potentially be pop. Metal specifically also has rebellious, anti social and sometimes satanic connotations which the mainstream are obviously averse to. In this case it's just coincidental that men may be the primary audience.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 09:49 PM
8

It's still pretty sad though when you see someone helpless being bullied on the subway or whatever. Male or female. If it was more normal to come to the aid of a stranger, then this kind of thing would be far less common. I'm not advocating for being a solo have a go hero. More the entire train turning on the one nutter. Rather that is all just looking the other way.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 06:59 PM
1

Don't know anything about this story other than what the newsclip showed. Was just trying to find any possible rational explanation for why someone would do that. But you're right, not even wearing a dress. What an absolute piece of shit!!
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:37 PM
2

Fair point. In my observation women, with some exceptions are far more about pair bonding with what they perceive as a "high value" male rather than fucking any guy that walks in front of them alla the bonobo.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:35 PM
1

Im talking more on a superficial level. Mainly around them not being perceived as a threat, which I believe is largely true. I'm not going to trust a stranger with anything significant, make or female.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:15 PM
6

You surround yourself with the wrong men. There's only one guy in my circle whom we all know will ditch you at any moment for a sniff of pussy. He's by far the loneliest.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:20 AM
-17

Is it possible that it did happen and she identified the wrong man out of confusion, then the CPS jumped on it with entirely the wrong 'evidence'?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:19 AM
3

It's just nature. Higher testosterone, more traditionally masculine traits. More masculine equates to perception as better protector, higher status etc. Always have to remember we're just monkeys wearing clothes..!
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:42 AM
13

Great post, never really thought about it like that. Rare I see anything particularly thought provoking on this sub, thanks! Do you think this might just be an unavoidable social reality though. I'm far less trusting of other men than women and anecdotally my judgement has been correct thus far. This is primarily around the threat of physical violence, but that naturally has an impact on overall perception. I also feel that this phenomenon only relates to strangers and is reversed when it comes …
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:32 AM
1

I think it's the correct use of the word isn't it? Progressive social policy seemingly revolves around the the neutering of white men for the perceived social benefit of everyone else.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 10:25 PM
0

Well thankyou for your moment of introspection, it is seemingly extremely rare on Reddit! I actually have a lot of empathy for those who feel like they are on the outside and dejected with life. I've been there myself. I absolutely recognise the plight of many young people in this modern world and I recognise that adapting is harder for men and boys. Which is why I am here. Increasing pressures put on men, which coincide with diminishing levels of guidance is a recipe for disaster and something …
/r/MensRights18/01/24 09:07 PM
0

Do please illucidate.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 08:29 PM
-3

The problem is that a high proportion of incels conflate their own self loathing and mental illness with men's rights. A large number are on this sub. They aren't actually here for furthering the conversation around men's rights, they are here to moan about how unfair life is and it's all the women's fault.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 11:06 PM
2

This seems like an absolute non-issue to me. Firstly the statistical likelihood of inadvertently becoming involved with a trans person is very low in the first place. Secondly there are very few if any trans people out there trying to trick you. And thirdly if you don't have a good look at the goods before you stick your weapon in, you've really only got yourself to blame. However morally speaking in this imaginary scenario, then yes it is wrong to trick someone into a sexual encounter they don'…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:22 AM
-1

Only basement dwellers who receive their information solely from the distorted perspective of the internet seem to have access to this compelling evidence. The reality is that men and women each have issues in the modern world and each have areas of social and biological advantage. Women's issues get a lot of attention, men's get none. There is also an ideological hate movement called feminism which is socially acceptable and gets mainstream attention. This has a huge negative impact on men and …
/r/MensRights20/12/23 10:39 PM
-25

I'd say bad for them, but trying to change their minds would be futile.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 08:22 PM
-30

These guys are already convinced unfortunately..
/r/MensRights19/12/23 07:43 PM
1

I think your inference is a pretty huge stretch, but each to their own.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 07:36 AM
1

I'd say probably yes on average. But women are far worse to other women at the extreme end. Exclusion and work place bullying of women by other women is far worse than it is for men in my experience.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 10:13 PM
1

Spend 5 minutes browsing some of the other comments on this post or look at some of the "incel" groups online and tell me with integrity that no-one is blaming women.. Men complaining about the fact that they have to compete for a mate is as ridiculous as feminists complaining about the fact that their minds and bodies are suited to raising children.. The rest of your post I agree with. If you want the equal pay l you gotta do the equal work. And as much as they don't like to acknowledge it, sit…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:01 PM
1

Lost what.. you don't even have a premise..
/r/MensRights30/11/23 04:59 AM
0

Not familiar no. A quick bit of research suggests the underlying causes were taxation, class, religion and famine which is in keeping with most civil war and rebellion/revolution throughout history. I'm struggling to find any reliable reference to an incel (bare branch) uprising. Something certainly needs to be done about the increasing number of disenfranchised men. But blaming women isn't the answer..!
/r/MensRights30/11/23 04:58 AM
2

Half isn't the vast majority, and I don't think anyone is disputing the fact that men are less selective than women, particularly when it comes to casual sex.. But again just look around you at normal couples..
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:28 AM
1

Which studies..? And yes it really is an alternate universe. You can sit behind a computer reading "studies" or you can go out into the real world and find out for yourself..
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:24 AM
-6

Sure but I've still never seen a mass shooting in the name of feminism.. And I hate feminism, but facts are facts..
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:56 AM
-6

Honestly, this is insane.. How many incels do you come across in the real world..? If you frequent the places on the internet where they all gather, your going to get a heavily distorted perception. I've known literally one guy who was a virgin at 30 and he didn't consider himself an incel. He's also now in a healthy relationship. There's plenty of unattractive weirdos in relationships and having sex with other unattractive weirdos.. the only ones who rule themselves out of the game are those st…
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:51 AM
-6

Is this information gleaned from the internet, or real world experience? I know alot of fucking ugly couples who are in very happy loving long term relationships.. I as a man am also in noway attracted to "the vast majority of women" I'm attracted to attractive women.. Tinder is a bad place to base opinions on this kind of stuff.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:42 AM
8

What nonsense. Your main premise comes down to women get free accommodation from predators which is a bizarre thing to try and phrase in a positive light.. Anyone who's watched wolf creek isn't hitchhiking around aus lol.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:35 AM
-18

You could also argue that feminists haven't shot up schools due to their ideological beliefs..
/r/MensRights28/11/23 01:20 AM
1

Yeah the sex one is easy. I'm talking about actually passing on ones genetic material and the satisfaction that comes with raising a child.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 08:21 AM
1

Well that was a long read.. entirely supports my ascertion though.. i.e. the feminist framing of historical gender differences as "oppression" is disengenuous. However those imbalances still existed and the vast majority of positions of power and influence were taken by men.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 07:30 AM
2

Iceland also has the best healthcare in Europe.. a more probable causal link. Otherwise some interesting ideas.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 07:09 AM
1

Its not much of a choice to give into your base biological drives though.. and if you procreate unfortunately your stuck with providing, because like the other chap said you'll be in for a lifetime of pain of you expect a woman to do it .
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:58 AM
1

Have you tried it? You couldn't pay me enough to be a stay at home parent all day!
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:54 AM
-1

That seems like a pretty wild claim.. I'm not sure how many family businesses were floating around amongst say the peasantry of pre-industrial Britain, and the period which followed was the era of the men in the factory/mines and the women at home. We know doctors/clergymen/politicians and other positions of respect and power were all exclusively male or near enough across most of recorded history (certainly well before the 20th century). Obviously if you go back far enough there's probably a mo…
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:52 AM
5

Its not only the generalisation, but also the vagueness of the statement which makes it silly. Even if there were any merit to the claim it would be unhelpful.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:32 AM
28

I was going to say I'd have thought Canada.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 03:45 AM
8

What a silly claim.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 02:57 AM
0

I've always found this argument interesting. Should we not be blaming the men who settle for women vastly below their "level" for incouraging this so called hypergamy..?
/r/MensRights20/11/23 03:57 AM
1

Is that any different from every bloke down the pub fantasizing over Margot Robbie (I think still trending..) though? I don't really think so.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 03:54 AM
2

This is such a weird topic, and you can tell the people that live their lives on the internet watching YouTube videos of "Pickup Artists". Of course pretty much all women like the "top 20%"of men. Just like pretty much all men like 8/9/10 out of 10 looking women. It doesn't mean that's all that one likes though.. You could easily flip this question on its head. If most men are attracted to super models, how do the plane Jane's and fat chicks get dates..? Women do tend to be more selective when c…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 03:51 AM
5

Yeah 100%, the internet is a very warped reflection of reality in most ways. The guys who try and find dates using the internet and then rage about it on an internet forum are not the ones we should be listening to!
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:14 AM
2

Yeah we need to do a muuuch better job at at calling out the extremists in this sub. There's a lot of really damaged men here, and actually is a good example of why we need social change. But these men need to be helped and shown the error of their cognitive biases, not given a platform spout hatred and bigotry. There's some absolutely insane claims made here that often go completely unchallenged. I say it all the time, but if "incels" are at the forefront of any conversation about men's rights,…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 11:37 PM
3

Disagree, I think the MRA movement needs to do more to distance itself from the extremists, we will continue to have very low credibility as long as these bitter emasculated loners attach themselves to the movement and spew nonsensical vitriol on our behalf.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 11:09 PM
7

Yeah that one, and I think you're being extremely generous in classifying feminism as an academic field..!
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:04 AM
1

Very true, I find it interesting watching the ideology cannibalize itself. But it seems most, including the feminists themselves fail to grasp the irony..!
/r/MensRights16/11/23 05:56 AM
9

As far as I understand, she's already married, extracted a child from, destroyed and divorced one guy.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 02:03 AM
14

Then you get descended upon by a hoard of screeming irrational banshees, who personally attack your character and are relentless in doing so until you give up. It's not this topic in particular, just using it as an example. Its a really toxic ideology which we as a society seem to have held up to a position that is beyond criticism. I don't see any way past that.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 01:24 AM
8

Agreed, and very well articulated. The thing is though that she and her ilk get mainstream airtime and are not treated like the extremists that they are. The problem with that in my mind, is that while most will still realise that what she's saying is extreme, if we don't immediately treat it with the scorn it deserves and allow the view to be aired loudly and publicly without challenge, it subtly shifts the dial so that slightly less extreme views start to look neutral. The indoctrination of ou…
/r/MensRights16/11/23 01:18 AM
0

There’s definitely a lot of whining children on this sub (wouldn’t call them men). They do a great job of undermining the actual need for a serious conversation about some of the struggle’s men and young boys in particular face in the modern world. Men’s rights activists have a terrible reputation as a result. That being said, a reasonable discourse can still be had about topics such as this one. Statistically men and women are about equally likely to be a victim of violent crime, women more so …
/r/MensRights14/11/23 05:10 AM
5

The admittedly limited research I have done suggests that the parking spaces are there for 2 purposes. 1) To make women FEEL safer, not necessarily because there is actually any heightened risk. 2) They are dimensionally larger due supposedly to women's lower parking skill. If women are legitimately at risk of being abducted whenever they go to the mall, there are some serious problems, which lines on the asphalt are not going to address..
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:41 AM
8

Do you have to murder to survive? Homicide statistics for the US are readily available online. You are correct though that there are typically a multitude of underlying factors at play behind any statistic and intergenerational racism is definitely the main factor in higher rates of crime amongst some communites. Thus it is important to address the cause and not misrepresent and then stick a plaster on the symptom. When it comes to violent street crime, the vast majority of people are not commit…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:25 AM
5

The bit you're missing is that while the females may have access to an exp booster that you don't, they're level capped at 50, whereas you have no cap. Don't give up and keep levelling up and then you'll realise how great it is playing as a male character..!
/r/MensRights07/11/23 11:18 PM
1

Nope I know the score. I'd just advise seeing a professional instead of projecting your insecurities over the internet, I don't think you'll get much out of it.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:03 AM
2

Surely you don't get anything out of peddling these misguided ramblings and fantasy's over the internet. Like there's no direct feedback loop to sooth your damaged ego..
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:32 AM
6

I'm certainly not offended. I've learned to be successful in an unfair world, and would rather motivate others to do the same instead of being bitter, resentful and lonely individuals who blame everyone but themselves. Under no circumstances am I advocating for being a doormat to entitled and manipulative individuals. I'd advise anyone to stay well clear of those..!
/r/MensRights06/11/23 10:00 PM
-9

This sub is just becoming a place for incels.. Women are not to blame for your lack of finding a partner. Neither are porn or video games in and of themselves. Addiction is bad for everyone, video game and porn addiction included. You are always the master of your own destiny (within limits). Stop wallowing in self pity, spend the porn/video game time upskilling and in the gym, get outside and you'll find a date. I'm
/r/MensRights06/11/23 06:35 PM
-1

Yep 100% this.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 06:20 PM
2

Yep yours is the correct and balanced response!
/r/MensRights02/11/23 04:15 AM
-12

Definitely agree. Though it appears that the sub has already turned into that judging by the responses on this post and the downvotes to your comment. I don't even understand what the underlying grievance is here. As a man do you have the right to defend yourself? Yes. Is society more critical about the level of force used in doing so against someone who is fundamentally much weaker..? Yes. Is this a significant problem? I don't think so.. The men's rights movement should be focused on things li…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 01:15 AM
-18

Yep you are 100% right. Unfortunately there's a majority of guys on this sub who lack the emotional maturity to understand this. It's a big part of the reason the whole men's rights movement isn't taken seriously by the mainstream. A bunch of sexually frustrated manchildren fantasizing about it being socially acceptable to slap around women in public really does not help the cause.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 01:03 AM
5

Yeah that's kind of my point..
/r/MensRights26/10/23 09:52 PM
92

Did there used to be a benefit?
/r/MensRights26/10/23 09:01 AM
5

In terms of broad issues affecting men: 1) Health - Mental health (suicide, depression, loneliness), lower life expectancy, lack of funding for male centric health conditions both research and screening. 2) Education - less funding again in the form of scholarships/bursaries, detrimental structure of courses. 3) Legal rights - active employment discrimination laws through quota systems, family rights, longer more sever custodial sentences. In terms of issues with the movement itself, the biggest…
/r/MensRights26/10/23 01:07 AM
1

Na he's right. The acknowledgement that men and particularly young boys are disadvantaged in modern society and the pursuit of better outcomes for them is a noble and valid endeavour. The problem comes when the movement is lumped together with other parts of the "manosphere" i.e. red pill, pick up artists, misogynists, incels etc., the lines can get blurred. Even on this page I see some pretty wild and extreme views aired which don't get called out anywhere near enough.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 11:15 PM
3

That is the whole point of being a feminist. However, it is oft repeated that "the patriarchy harms men as much as it does women, therefore all men should become feminists". It is this disengenuous framing which opens it to criticism. It's also strange to me that on an individual level we recognise equality of opportunity as being important and beyond that (in theory) value meritocracy. However, when we stratify the population into groups based on gender or race we track absolute equality of out…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 01:21 AM
0

When did I say it did?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 08:33 AM
3

That's a pretty warped view. If there was no instinct to protect and provide we would be extinct as a species. It's pretty hard to hunt and survive when pregnant or with a young infant. Similarly if you've never experienced a real fraternal bond with other men that's pretty sad, but most men will put there own ass on the line to protect their friends. You can work on the qualities I've outlined above and I can guarantee you'll find successes in whatever you put your mind to. All the while steeri…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 08:26 AM
3

This is why the "manosphere" is exactly the wrong place to be getting your idea of masculinity from. Largely just damaged men. Masculinity is and always has been about stoicism, emotional and physical strength, assertiveness, decisiveness, controlled aggression, competence, leadership and independence. None of the above is dependant on women. In fact you'll find having the above traits will mean other men look to you for association, friendship and advice.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:35 AM
0

I still have no idea what you are trying to say..
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:57 PM
-6

Your poorly formed sentences aren't my problem.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 12:11 AM
3

I don't know if you've ever cold approached women before.. but success with 1 in 3 is definitely good odds..
/r/MensRights13/10/23 07:47 AM
2

Weak men and absent fathers are the problem. The fact that often gets missed is that the father's often are not absent by choice. The attack on masculinity is the single greatest sin of feminism in my eyes, and they've succeeded. It's in the schools now and entrenched. The one positive I suppose is that you can't just talk down the power of masculinity. Those who rebel against this feminisation of society will find success much easier.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 02:39 AM
-2

Most women are pedos...? Think you need to justify that one!
/r/MensRights13/10/23 02:33 AM
19

You're just being pedantic. The extrapolation is based on the increase in probability. There's always going to be nuance in a particular scenario, but if you are you and attractive there is a good chance women will respond positively. If you are old and ugly or even just a different race (which opens a whole new can of worms) then not so much.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 11:50 PM
16

A great example of this is that aussie feminist Clementine Ford. She talks about teaching her son not to be a rapist. Projecting her own severely warped world view onto her innocent child, it's tantamount to child abuse. But this kind of thing is praised by a significant part of society.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 11:39 PM
-9

Your particular situation kind of sounds like your Dad was the problem. Having a strong father figure is critical for boys development. Women are fundamentally ill equipped to deal with raising well rounded emotionally healthy men who embrace their masculinity. Add trauma caused by an abusive partner into the mix and it's never going to end well. That being said there are definitely some horrible women out there doing terrible things to their kids, particularly boys and it is often actually prai…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 10:28 PM
1

Interesting! I think the point is though that regardless of what ones hormones are or aren't doing it's never an excuse for shitty behaviour..!
/r/MensRights12/10/23 07:20 AM
2

You seem to have muddied the water a little with some people by mentioning sex drives. I think a better example would be aggression. Directly related to testosterone levels. Feminists label aggression as "toxic masculinity" yet it is an immutable sex characteristic, and when channeled correctly can be incredibly useful however. Men are however rightly expected to control aggression and it is not acceptable to have random outbursts and claim "sorry just my hormones". Women on the other hand are n…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 06:41 AM
3

Not sure how old you are. But honestly, once you've accumulated a bit of wealth, and status in society you realise it's pretty good being a man in a capitalist world. Attracting women is easy, pursuing interests is easy, respect comes easy. There's no point being part of a revolution with no clear objective. It's just going to make you feel like an outcast and become resentful. As soon as a viable alternative to capitalism presents itself I'll be behind it. But for now enjoy the positives you ca…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 06:32 AM
2

But relatively speaking, the improvements to peoples lives over history directly as a result of technological advancement is pretty linear.. Growing up during the second world war in England for the average person was still more comfortable than living through a period of peace in the 13th century. It's indesputable that huge leaps in technological advancement have taken place as a result of free enterprise and capitalism. I do also agree that it is absurd to think that capitalism is the peak of…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 06:23 AM
1

I don't think you can call economics firm science..? Social science at best.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 11:08 PM
1

I know .. I'm saying it is incorrect to suggest the practice is caused by other women. Clearly it is an internalised form of male oppression.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 08:11 AM
1

I don't think women decided to just start mutilating themselves for fun though..
/r/MensRights09/10/23 03:42 AM
7

A lot of the shit people moan about is just reactionary whataboutism. The reality is men and women face different issues precisely because we aren't equal. Men's rights movement in my mind is (or should be) about addressing issues which uniquely affect men. It's not about internalizing the bullshit gender studies agenda.. and then saying men aren't treated equally in XYZ. This topic is a perfect example. Men don't care about how other men look. Therefore it's not an issue for us. Women care imme…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 02:39 AM
3

And in fact a lot more penis than vag. There's a whole South Park episode dedicated to it..!
/r/MensRights06/10/23 02:14 AM
4

Not even sure what you're talking about now. I think you've confused yourself. A womans looks have the power to influence. A man's status has the power to influence. Yes correct.. neither of those two statements indicate attraction to the power itself. Anyway I'm not here to argue a point that is well understood by most. Suggest you spend a bit more time thinking about it. To anyone else reading this, the main takeaway is that no you don't need to be a CEO to be attractive to Women. Be competent…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 11:34 PM
5

Yeah and beautiful women have the "power" to attract men. That's not what power means in this context. Power is about control, authority and influence. People who have those usually have high status, but not always true in reverse as per the examples I've already given. It's a subtle but important difference.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:48 PM
20

Not power, status. Usually the two go hand in hand, but even in social microcosms, high status individuals with limited power still attract women. Think athletes at school as a mainstream example, but even within sub cultures, the most goth guy attracts all the other goth chicks within that circle.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:20 PM
1

Your thinking about it like a man and forgetting forgetting the most important rule. Women don't behave logically. Anyway, not saying pick someone who doesn't work. But someone who isn't obsessed with climbing the corporate ladder, not more focused on their career than their family and the big one is doesn't earn more money than you do (if women don't see you as having a higher status than they do they won't respect you and that's the biggest danger for straying).
/r/MensRights05/10/23 05:30 PM
4

There's a lot of very damaged men on this page. Don't take their advice at face value. There's some terrible women out there, and the system is definitely rigged against men, but don't go through life treating all women as the enemy. You'll end up bitter and resentful. If you find a good woman, and you want kids, have kids. Try find one with traditional views, shares your interests, and is not career obsessed and you'll be fine. Getting involved with a "career woman" who sees you as a sperm dono…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 01:54 AM
1

I'm only 5 years older than you. I wouldn't say you've missed it entirely. But part of it is just not sustainable any more, and it is very hard to undo the now generational feminist brainwashing young women are exposed to. My wife was a casual feminist like most of her peers when I met her and used to believe in things like "the wage gap". She's also an intelligent person and we had some very heated debates in the early years, I opened her eyes on a few things, and she's now come to realise how …
/r/MensRights03/10/23 02:05 AM
1

I'm early 30s and I remember that. Mainly my granparents generation it was ubiquitous. My parents generation there was a noticeable shift it was still there, but it's like some mums were trying to fight their maternal instincts. My generation seem to just want to be friends with their kids. Younger generation just seem to see having a family as an inconvenience.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 01:19 AM
1

My wife stays at home and raises the kids. I'm lucky that I earn more than twice the median income, so we can afford to do it. As soon as they are all at school though she's going back into the workforce. I've had a taste of the tradcon lifestyle and I can see the appeal, it's just no longer feasible in our era. I don't think it's the same as feminism by any means though. They are just people who pine for the old ways and are unable to accept times have changed. Feminism is the thing that destro…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 01:14 AM
1

I think a big thing people are missing here is what the economic impact dual income households have had. Your money is worth less. In the old days a family of four could live comfortably on one income. Now you both need to work full-time for the same lifestyle, except nobody has time to raise their own kids. Even if a woman "earns her own money", you still have to put essentially the same portion of your own income toward your family living expenses. In fact now you actually need a woman more th…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 12:49 AM
1

Balanced and reasonable perspective
/r/MensRights03/10/23 12:37 AM
0

Your problem isn't being a straight white dude. Your problem is you chose a shitty career path and you sound like you don't embrace your masculinity. There is a concerted effort to destroy masculinity by the left all around the world. Fight it. You need to stop feeling sorry for yourself and be a man. Be ascertive, be emotionally stable, train you mind, train your body, be competent, be confident. The world will open up to you.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 12:17 AM
1

Is your Girl asexual too? If so, you don't have much to worry about. Keep on the same. If not, then she's going to leave you eventually anyway... That being said it's always better to have your eyes open to reality (red pill).
/r/askTRP19/02/17 06:15 AM
1

I like the girl, she's pretty fun and like HB8. The other guy's she has known for years. Way lower SMV than myself, definitely firmly in the friendzone. I'm not worried about branch swinging at all in this case. I just get the feeling that I'm being manipulated somehow, which I don't like. Maybe I'm overreacting and there's another way to deal with the situation. We're in a new city and ordinarily a flat share would be perfectly acceptable. My plan over the next few months is to concentrate on w…
/r/askTRP07/02/17 09:20 AM
1

I've been going through the material here for about a 3 weeks (slowly). We've been living together for about 5 months. I was sort of naturally purple pill before I found this sub. So I think I hold frame reasonably well in general. I know now that I've still made a lot of mistakes in the relationship up to now, and her interest is starting to fade.
/r/askTRP07/02/17 06:04 AM
1

I've got almost 10 years boxing experience. I know that it counts for very little in a street fight. If someone assaults you, (i.e spits in your face, or pushes you aggressively) you're already in a fight, and you've already failed. Try not to focus on learning when to punch someone, try to focus on avoiding situations that require punching at all.. Use your words and body language. Don't look like a victim. Don't act like a victim. Try to see trouble before it happens.
/r/askTRP06/02/17 08:47 AM
2

No not true. Theres always a risk. If you rubber up though, the risk is about the same as being hit by a golf ball during sex. Could happen, but it won't. Always have a good look before you stick your willy in. Anything that looks or smells abnormal stay away. Genital warts can be hard to spot, flesh coloured and sometimes hidden between the labia.
/r/askTRP02/02/17 02:56 PM
6

If you're into a bit of dark humour; typing "man sacrifices himself for girlfriend" into google brings up many tales of selfless heroism. Typing "woman sacrifices herself for boyfriend" brings up a story of a woman sacrificially killing her boyfriend with a kitchen knife...
/r/askTRP02/02/17 02:44 PM
1

Yes! This is also where abundance mentality comes in. If you try and play a game with just this one girl, not answering her texts etc. She will win! If you've got a few other options on the go, you can just text them instead. Facebook is also really useful in situations like this, use technology to your advantage! Next time you ask her to do something, and she ignores you. Invite another girl instead (even if it's just a friend, better a HB though) and post some pictures of you having a good tim…
/r/askTRP02/02/17 02:22 PM
1

That's an internalisation of feminist narrative if ever I saw one. That we men should be grateful of feminism, and the fact that there is an abundance of 'liberated' women. In reality nothing has changed; the Alphas of the 50's were still slaying women. Why do you think there were so many back yard abortion clinics..? Housewives were still having extra marital affairs, often cuckolding their beta providers. Especially during times of war.. The fall of religion and the rise of the secular state i…
/r/askTRP02/02/17 02:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter