TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

maxsommers Archive

View 1 post and 148 comments by maxsommers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

entertainment mediamaxsommers/r/EverydayMisandry21/07/26 07:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

So, Sabrina Carpenter?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/07/26 03:19 PM
11

Oligarchy would be a more accurate term.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 01:15 PM
14

Looked it up a month ago and men rape about as often as women commit paternity fraud. Men rape about as often as women do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 11:43 PM
5

And she still couldn't produce a decent performance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 10:52 PM
13

God she is vile. And of course no one in the mainstream calls it out.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/26 02:59 AM
5

I have no idea who this person is but it's funny to see his name here when I just had some angry feminist cite his content as "proof" that Andrew Tate is wildly popular among men and single-handedly responsible for the rise of misogyny and toxic male behavior. Just remember when you see stuff like this that they, by definition, support the likes of this and this and therefore have no room to talk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 06:16 PM
14

They do?
/r/MensRights06/01/26 12:09 AM
24

The whole "male gaze" theory is a load of hogwash to begin with. Spawned from one feminist critic in the 70's.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 07:27 PM
6

It's the hypocrisy that gets me. This is her at premieres for this movie. Cleavage on full display and tiny miniskirt. Why not go for something more tasteful and demure if she's so concerned about "the male gaze"? This isn't required dressing for a role: this is choosing an outfit to wear as herself at a public event.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 07:26 PM
2

People might take you more seriously without the hyperbolic vulgarity. And the added context to the scene still doesn't excuse a physical assault, sorry. Unless you maybe agree that if the roles were reversed he'd be within his rights to smack her in the head (not that that would likely make it in a mainstream movie and played for laughs, though.) If he'd fondled her breasts during the exam or something, then sure, that'd warrant a physical retaliation. But that's not what happened.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 07:09 PM
11

So if the roles were reversed you think that he'd be within his rights to give her a "beating"?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 05:43 PM
7

Are they MRA organisations, or do they follow that ethos? Who are they? Do you have any examples?
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:43 PM
6

So you're saying MRA or related equivalents have done things like the numerous examples I posted? Things like a major organisation like the United Nations denying aid to women in disaster stricken areas on the basis of their gender? Or the National Organisation for Women challenging shared parenting and fathers rights?
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:19 PM
13

I agree with you that most feminists do care about equal rights and the man hate is loudest on the internet. The same thing happens in this sub, there is a lot of flat out woman hate that makes it hard to find the stuff actually related to men's rights. The difference is the "man hate" isn't just on the internet or posts on a reddit sub. If you can find MRA or related equivalents to the kind of things feminists in politics, education, the media etc say and do that have negative effects on boys a…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:16 PM
2

You're conflating "women" with "feminists", something which is often used as a point of criticism against subs like this (not that I'm accusing you of that specifically). Not all women are feminists and not all feminists are women. The op of the thread is asking the question to self identified feminists who are here, they didn't say "women who are feminists who lurk this subreddit...." However, feminism in the general sense has negative effects which go way beyond online communities and social m…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:01 PM
4

A thread with 38 comments from a sub that has 186K members. Not exactly proof of much tbh.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 08:07 PM
3

Patriarchy theory is a load of hogwash.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/06/25 01:09 PM
6

You're correct. Although the compilation of evidence itself is good, the creator of these videos is clearly a very feminist leaning, "patriarchy hurts men too" type. There are other videos he's done on similar topics where it's pretty obvious like one on the "Barbie" movie. IIRC I saw some comments on the Men's Rights sub (or one of them anyway) from at least one redditor who said they'd had comments removed/ignored on the Youtube channel when they tried to show evidence to the contrary of his c…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/06/25 11:09 PM
12

I'm sorry, how is this related to MRAs? Though misogynist incels are often perceived as a movement without political aims, violent perpetrators have the same type of far-reaching aims that white nationalists have: to completely change the culture and politics of society to favor their own group. Political ideas supported by misogynist incels range from concentration camps for women to mandating government-sponsored girlfriends and enforced monogamy to wiping out most of the existing “alpha” men …
/r/MensRights01/04/25 03:08 AM
37

Statistics are racist?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 03:04 AM
4

The ideology behind it just as much the problem as the "movement" is. You clearly believe that feminism is the answer to "equal rights" judging by almost every comment you've posted in this thread so far.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:31 PM
7

If you truly believed in equal rights you wouldn't be a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:15 PM
6

Because of basic biology. This is exactly the line of thinking that is often use to marginalise or dismiss male victims of domestic violence and sexual assault at the hands of women.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:37 PM
13

Jenny Mccarthy and Bieber, too. And that was on a stage in front of an audience on TV.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 01:40 AM
–

You took advantage of me not specifying, huh? I was using your specifications. You do not meet your own specifications, therefore being an mra is about misogyny and nothing else, by your own standards. You'd have to provide examples of prominent MRA's in similar positions of power and influence as the feminists in the op making misogynist statements for this to be a fair comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 11:40 PM
–

Ayyy we have found the one good feminist, now we just have to find a couple hundred million more. Not so much. That whole hashtag"HeForShe" campaign was a load of BS. This whole thread is very telling though, the whole lack of legitimate examples to answer op's question.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 10:24 PM
4

Ya'll seriously unaware that people lie on the internet? Especially in a time when being a victim is a form of social currency? Maybe, or likely, this is a prime example of that!
/r/MensRights10/12/24 08:30 PM
2

In that case, technically this was a "woman" then, so your OP is still valid.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 07:52 PM
3

They get tried as the gender they identify as now, don't they?
/r/MensRights27/11/24 07:43 PM
1

What does any of this have to do with my comment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 06:20 PM
33

I don't recall every detail of the case, but from memory there was scant evidence on her part. I'm pretty sure she was caught out faking/lying about injuries. There was a video of Depp angrily slamming cupboard doors but is that abuse? Meanwhile, Heard was caught on audio recording literally admitting to the abuse, and taunting him about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 06:13 PM
5

So, not actually an "equality" movement at all, then.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:14 PM
23

Well at Red Hot Chilli Pipers gigs, maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 10:34 PM
15

It didn't change, it was just less popular in mainstream discourse and thus less exposed. Social media played a big factor, too.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:15 PM
2

Right back at ya. I'm the only one in this comment chain who's provided facts; you haven't backed up a single thing you've claimed.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:51 AM
6

This article on de Beauvoir goes into greater detail than the Wikipedia link from the op.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 10:55 PM
2

Don't waste your time; this person is either an idiot, a troll, or both.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 10:47 PM
1

Sure, Jan.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 10:45 PM
4

You mean the model that is proven to be biased against male victims, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that one of its creators (Ellen Pence) admitted was flawed? That "scientifically backed" Duluth Model?
/r/MensRights21/08/24 02:55 PM
3

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 01:48 PM
12

It had already been debunked countless times in 2019.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 09:52 PM
3

Women didn't used to have the right to vote Voting rights were not as black and white as the popular narrative wants us to believe, and men did not have universal suffrage either. own a credit card Credit cards were not common until the late 50's and 60's, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 74 made it illegal for banks to discriminate against women for various possible reasons, but there is a long history of women banking. For an example, an article can be found in the October issue of The …
/r/MensRights03/08/24 07:32 PM
1

If you're so disillusioned and critical of the sub why don't you try starting some threads and discussions yourself? Be the change you want to see, etc
/r/MensRights26/07/24 04:57 PM
2

It is, yes. I didn't make it up though. Also yes, that is French for "me too." I don't know why those subs chose that name, however, as they seem to be general celebrity gossip subs albeit with a radfem angle.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 04:28 PM
18

Glad someone pointed this out. There was a reason why that Sharon Stone scene in "Basic Instinct" caused such a stir back in 1992 even though full female nudity was allegedly already super common back then. Male nudity and or men being "objectified" in media isn't a new or recent thing, it's just that many, even people who don't subscribe to any feminist viewpoints, seem to have a sort of ingrained bias in how they view it compared to female nudity or sexualised scenes. It's like a blindspot. I …
/r/MensRights13/07/24 02:47 PM
13

Agreed, and not just with these particular issues either. I know that some, many even, feel that it's necessary in order to get the message across without it being dismissed (which often happens anyway so it's kind of moot, really) but I think that it's time to stop the kowtowing approach, period.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 05:34 PM
8

Would you care to post some examples of these academics....?
/r/MensRights19/06/24 03:19 PM
2

It's a tactic often used to acknowledge her initial work in opening the shelter while using it as "proof" that "feminists help men too, see???" As you can see from the article I posted that Erin wrote herself: "Thirty years later, when feminism exploded onto the scene, I was often mistaken for a supporter of the movement. But I have never been a feminist, because, having experienced my mother’s violence, I always knew that women can be as vicious and irresponsible as men." "Indeed, I would go so…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 03:12 PM
3

There are great feminists out there who truly see men as people too, like Erin Pizzey or Karen DeCrow, but for the majority it is unclear what they truly believe in. Erin is most certainly not a feminist.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 05:04 AM
1

Feminism was never about equality.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 04:57 AM
1

I think you might have messed up some links for sources and citations. There are a lot of words contained in these [] with (#) following but contain no URL or otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:14 PM
6

And serving in the military has never been a requirement for voting, at least in the United States. Men in the US are still required to sign up for Selective Service upon turning 18 which affects their voting rights, among other things. Women do not, nor have they ever.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:09 PM
6

Not in this instance. OP is pointing out how feminism espouses ironically misogynistic ideas about women. This isn't to do with their general sexist views of men i.e. misandry.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:04 PM
3

Or shirtless/nude scenes, hence my point. As you allude to, they're usually pretty covered up, particularly the supersuits most of them wear in the MCU/DC films. They could easily just put padding in the costume to create the required muscular shape.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 04:28 PM
36

They have to get in shape for those scenes, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 02:01 AM
9

To be fair, they'd be unlikely to find unbiased answers. Easily, anyway.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 01:52 AM
8

If I may add to this, some examples. An article from the October issue of The Banker's Monthly from 1920 Women are rapidly becoming accustomed to their new freedom. One of the evidences of the broadening of their interests is particularly noticed in the banking world. The increasing number of accounts opened by women, both in the savings and checking departments, has been a matter of wide comment by bankers all over the United States. It is this movement that makes the woman a factor in bank bui…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 01:49 AM
3

Interesting, deranged... It's a fine line.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 08:58 PM
10

This bell hooks? Males as a group have and do benefit the most from patriarchy, from the assumption that they are superior to females and should rule over us. But those benefits have come with a price. In return for all the goodies men receive from patriarchy, they are required to dominate women, to exploit and oppress us, using violence if they must to keep patriarchy intact. Most men find it difficult to be patriarchs. Most men are disturbed by hatred and fear of women, by male violence agains…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:58 PM
16

The minority of the feminist movement is anti-man. Well this '''minority''' are the ones in charge, unless you consider the National Organisation for Women or the UN or the campaigners who introduced policies that discriminate against male victims of violence inconsequential? In fact some of the most influential feminists were avid men’s rights activists and advocates Like who? If you're talking about Christina Hoff Sommers and Camille Paglia, they're basically persona non grata in feminist circ…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:18 PM
4

Do you genuinely believe staring should be illegal? An arrestable offence? I know you're being mendacious but I'm curious all the same.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 05:22 PM
23

This is hardly an example in a vacuum, though. What, in your opinion, is "actual feminism"?
/r/MensRights13/04/24 05:17 PM
3

I think a woman making inappropriate comments towards a man should be punished or disciplined regardless of whether or not she's a feminist, don't you?
/r/MensRights04/04/24 12:19 AM
7

OP said feminists, who have been solely responsible for widening the net for all forms of sexual harassment to encompass relatively mild instances like this, or even non-existent ones. Whether or not the woman in this case is a feminist is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 05:42 PM
16

Fit is UK slang for "hot" or "sexy", it doesn't necessarily mean the person actually is fit in an athletic sense.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 05:40 PM
3

I forgot to mention that in my other comment, that the woman (Ruth Handler) was also literally a character in the film. I'm sure that wasn't intentional... \s
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:34 AM
7

It was a gender studies laden feminist wet dream disguised as a fluffy comedy film about a doll.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 12:22 AM
16

Good point. Mattel actually released some sort of statement about the film not being feminist, which was refuted by the people actually behind the film. There's an article about the whole thing here. Kind of amusing, tbh, like there were concerted attempts at downplaying it before it was released.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:54 PM
87

There's also the fact that they portrayed the Mattel board of directors as an all white male bunch of buffoons, whereas in reality this is what the company's board of directors actually looks like. Not to mention Mattel's first president was the woman who created Barbie, a position she held for thirty years, from the mid-forties no less. I don't think the movie was evil incarnate or anything, but denying there was an agenda behind it or that it was actually secretly dunking on feminism or whatev…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:55 PM
122

I was going to say "surprisingly" but it's not surprising at all: a number of people don't even know the word, period. Directly related to this movie I saw a clip of an interview with Margot Robbie and Greta Gerwig, with Robbie literally saying "Whatever the opposite of misogyny is" when discussing some of themes in the film. The interview itself is interesting, in a telling way, as it seems like they're both on opposite pages, with neither of them seeming to understand the film that they've mad…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:49 PM
7

Try over a hundred. The first wavers were no different.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 08:45 PM
7

Classical feminism was about equality. No, it wasn't.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 02:33 PM
19

These types of things are so underreported, it's not surprising you've never heard of it. Very few of the issues prominent in feminism are actually as gendered as they make them out to be, and affect boys and men in equal measure, sometimes moreso. You might find the following master-posts interesting: A big compilation of arguments and statistical evidence that I am becoming very tired of having to restate. A compilation of evidence debunking feminist historical revisionism. Some sources on sex…
/r/MensRights19/03/24 02:13 PM
7

I wonder if they'll bother replying to this....?
/r/MensRights18/03/24 11:19 PM
6

If they were actually banned it must have been for a good reason. I've been a member of this sub long enough to know it's very lax in that area compared to most others. Saying that this one, of all places, is modded by "cucks" who "worship pussy" is laughable.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 08:59 PM
2

You make the claim, you back it up.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 06:53 PM
3

You're the one who came into the thread making various claims first - the onus is on you. However, although I'm not going to do the legwork for you: here, and another, and another, and another, and another... Miss me with the "why would I waste my time..." bit because it's blatantly obvious the reason why you refuse to back up your points is because you can't, and seem to think writing large paragraphs of waffle while slinging around insults and personal remarks makes you the bigger man enlighte…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 07:32 PM
3

Women in western society: Longer life expectancy Small minority of homicide victims Tiny minority of workplace fatalities Less likely to be victims of violent crime Less likely to commit suicide Less likely to be homeless Receive more lenient treatment in the criminal justice system across the board Receive the majority of funding for health, social, educational, and economic issues Have more legal rights and privileges, and are consistently the majority voting block in elections Must be the mos…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:57 PM
3

Prove me wrong, then: provide some sources.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:30 PM
1

Men choose to die more because they don’t seek help for their depression. Professor Nav Kapur reported in the really important study he led, that many middle-aged men had actually been in contact with services but were not being seen or recognised as ‘at risk’, or having mental health problems. The startling statistic from the research showed that of those men who had taken their own lives and had actually sought help and were assessed for suicidal risk in 2017, 80% had been assessed by clinicia…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:24 PM
3

Translation: I won't back up my claims because I can't. Shocker.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:13 PM
4

If the content in the OP is enough to push these people away, that really says more about them than us.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 03:30 PM
6

They purposefully misunderstand and fuel hatred on purpose, no matter how clear, concise, and factual we are.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 02:54 PM
2

You might convince more people if you provided sources to back up all your claims.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 02:31 PM
1

They're so predictable. I could tell from the "Yikes" in their second comment in this thread, tbh. They all use the same lingo and buzzwords: y'all, educate yourself, incel, problematic, heckin, started a conversation, here's why that's a good thing, etc Edit - Like clockwork: Probably not seeing how blockheaded y’all seem to be
/r/MensRights12/03/24 02:29 PM
1

Countries with fewer guns or gun "culture" have basically the same disparity in suicide rates as the US. There's also this study on methods: Methods: Data on completed and attempted suicides were collected (n=3235, Nuremberg and Wuerzburg, years 2000-2004). The research question was analyzed by comparing the method-specific case fatality (= completed suicides/completed+attempted suicides) for males and females. Results: Among the events captured, men chose high-risk methods like hanging signific…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 02:26 PM
15

Clearly further evidence of THE PATRIARCHY!
/r/MensRights06/03/24 08:56 PM
31

I actually think that might have been at Taylor Swift shows as well, a year or two ago.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:41 AM
33

Meanwhile there's a plethora of misandrists in every facet of feminism, and they don't even bother to hide it.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:38 AM
1

Do you feel the same way about women who are "triggered" by such things?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 06:29 PM
45

What does Trump have to do with anything? Is this 2016? u/63daddy is clearly saying that feminists' typical tactic of blaming any wrongdoing on the part of a women on '''the patriarchy''' or male oppression or internalised misogyny or whatever other BS excuses they come up with is actually infantilising women and denying them agency, which is ironic to say the least. They're simultaneously hyper capable and competent while being so easily swayed or brainwashed by male influence, or prone to just…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 09:11 PM
5

More than likely. They do it with literally every other piece of inconvenient data like this. A large part of the ideology is built on it, point of fact.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 06:17 PM
14

Agreed. Same with phrases like "my truth."
/r/MensRights03/02/24 12:48 AM
2

The fact that anyone was nominated for an Academy Award for "Barbie" is the real travesty here.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:16 PM
1

Technically correct, just not not in this case. Toxic relationship, mutual abuse, both have several priors: The couple from Leigh, Wigan, had been involved in an abusive seven month relationship. During the violent struggle inside Mr Seddon's property, Hurst allegedly slashed her own neck with a razor before she smashed a Budweiser beer bottle against a kitchen unit and then stabbed her former partner with the jagged edge. Mr Seddon fought back but Hurst then grabbed a hammer from the living roo…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 09:00 PM
3

There's also the proven bias towards female criminals being given more lenient treatment in the justice system across the board. Finding a few cases to the contrary doesn't change or disprove that.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 06:34 AM
12

You're making an awful lot of generalised claims with zero evidence to support them...
/r/MensRights20/01/24 05:59 AM
5

What was the show?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:44 AM
22

Why does that matter?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:35 AM
17

ShE's nOT A rEAl FEMinIsT, tho!1!!!1
/r/MensRights02/01/24 03:47 AM
21

We could even spell it like an adult: rape.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 10:38 PM
6

So honest question and Devil's advocate: since lads are loving it and there's no harm done to them what is the problem exactly? Do you feel the same if it's a male teacher with a female student and she is "loving it"?
/r/MensRights19/12/23 10:37 PM
4

Well, most teachers are women, so if it's not feminist ideological influence what's the alternative? Innate biological bias? That's not a very charitable view of women tbh...
/r/MensRights17/12/23 02:29 PM
5

Well I guess that invalidates all the other stuff, then. You got me!
/r/MensRights04/12/23 10:46 PM
3

The ideology is certainly pretty evil. And aligning with that ideology is a choice you make, which comes with all the negative baggage associated with it. Not my problem. Do you honestly think there are billions of feminists?
/r/MensRights04/12/23 10:45 PM
15

*A minority of straight white men. It's called the Apex Fallacy. And throughout the western world which is majorly white, women are better off in most aspects, from having longer life expectancies, being far less likely to be killed, commit suicide, be homeless, be a victim of street crime, and receive preferential treatment in the criminal justice system, and the majority of funding for social and health issues.... among many other things. So your collective "straight white men" category aren't…
/r/MensRights04/12/23 09:19 PM
6

The silence from the ones with common sense who disagree with the never ending list of double standards and repugnant ideas is deafening. Unless you can provide some examples to the contrary?
/r/MensRights04/12/23 09:14 PM
43

Absolutely! Look at the positive press Leonardo DiCaprio gets for his love life.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 12:25 AM
33

One woman (literally one) got into trouble for tweeting #killallmen a few years ago, but that was a very rare anomaly.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:37 PM
4

Frankly, I think the kid gloves approach to these issues hasn't done much good, so why not be more direct like this? Anything that goes against the preferred narrative gets slandered regardless.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:35 PM
45

Not to mention female comedians ('''comedians''' if we're talking current year) tell jokes like this directed at men all the fucking time. Worse, even.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 03:37 AM
10

not make reporting easier for women Just women?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 01:47 PM
7

The current president of the United States and his VP are both avowed feminists. Pre-White House, Biden was instrumental in the introduction of VAWA back in the 90s. Not to mention women are consistently the majority voting block.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 09:29 PM
7

When you look beyond the various legal and societal biases you'll find that it equalises quite a bit to say the very least. See also. And also.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 06:20 AM
5

I mean, any sub named after PoundMeToo is bound to be full of shit...
/r/MensRights22/10/23 06:46 PM
5

I don't remember "GI Jane" being particularly misandrist? Granted it's been some time since I've seen it...
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:13 PM
7

And "Birds of Prey." And "Terminator: Dark Fate." And "She Said." And "The 355."
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:10 PM
12

Isn’t it a model on how rehabilitation should work once someone is convicted of abuse? Absolutely not.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 07:06 PM
4

I agree with this actually, but I'm sure I remember seeing something about her choosing to have her son circumcised when he was born. It's not often something like that would randomly be discussed in the media so there was maybe a reason this protestor chose one of her shows specifically. Edit - I was right, it happened back in 2019.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 08:58 PM
13

Are you a very dedicated troll, or have you just taken the mask off? Either way it's... amusing.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:15 PM
2

Texas 50% pro-life. 52% of prolifers are women and 48% are men. Src: https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/state/texas/views-about-abortion/ BTW the initial sponser of the house bill was a woman and initial sponsor of the senate bill was a man. "Once that heartbeat is detected, that life is protected," said Rep. Shelby Slawson, the House sponsor of the measure said before the bill passed 81-63. "For far too long, abortion has meant the end of a beating heart." https://www.nbcdfw.com…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 04:42 PM
32

That's 20 year-old research, my dude. Things might have changed since then. Women in the western world continue to have more rights and privileges than men, and even in other countries are a minority of murder victims, less likely to commit suicide, less likely to be homeless, etc etc, despite men (or The Patriarchy™) still being in power so... I doubt it, bro. Despite the griping, they're effectively benefitting from the system. And there is little to no evidence that women in positions of powe…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 12:28 AM
103

so perhaps more women in power might be a good idea. The demographic with an in-group bias, you mean? Somehow I doubt it would improve matters. And that's not even mentioning things like NOW (National Organisation for Women) opposing father's rights and shared custody in the family courts....
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:28 PM
16

There is no patriarchy. Certainly not in the western world, at the very least.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 11:51 AM
26

No actual feminist will disagree with this. Citation needed.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:22 PM
11

Odd coincidence that it matches the global homicide victim rate almost exactly. It tends to hover around 80% as well, give or take one or two percent, according to the UNODC.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 07:53 PM
36

It just means '''the patriarchy''' is backfiring, because '''it hurts men, too'''.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 07:51 PM
1

No, I'm rebuking your stance that because you had never heard of either of these feminists they must be irrelevant or inconsequential, unlike someone like Elliot Rodger. Very few people are even aware of those feminists. I’ve certainly never heard of them. Far more people know about mass shooters like Elliot Rodger who is actually praised in dark corners of the internet. Their influence is still very much present in the feminist sphere, extremist or not, and as I showed with the links I provided…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:07 PM
2

Wikipedia articles contain numerous external links providing details on the information presented. Here is the accompanying piece to the tweet from The New York Times about Valerie Solanas (which you easily could have found), and here is another piece in praise of her from The Spectator. She was also featured in an episode of hit TV show "American Horror Story" portrayed by Lena Dunham, another shitty feminist. "The SCUM Manifesto" is widely available to buy from stores like Amazon and Barnes & …
/r/MensRights09/07/23 05:35 PM
0

A tiny amount of Americans can name the Founding Fathers, so by this logic I guess they were basically irrelevant, too?
/r/MensRights09/07/23 05:05 PM
2

Because if not, making the claim that they are considered notable is horseshit. Except it's not, because it's factually correct. Valerie Solanas Andrea Dworkin Sally Miller Gearhart Mary Daly Simon de Beauvoir I don't need to be a feminist to know about it. What a ludicrous suggestion. As you mentioned, MRA has Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson, both known to be extremely toxic individuals who also prey on the vulnerable. I quite explicitly said that people attempt to lump various people into "the…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 01:13 AM
2

Firstly, you specifically mentioned "extremes of the internet" which to me suggested the extremism being discussed in this thread is found only among randoms online and therefore easily dismissed as not to be taken seriously. And secondly, are these manifestos being praised as "seminal texts" by the New York Times, or being studied in academia? The two women that I mentioned in my comment aren't just random known crazies; as I said, both were prominent feminist figures whose works and contributi…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:27 PM
1

I've yet to see any actual proof that Elliot Rodger was an MRA or any way aligned with the movement. That article certainly doesn't provide any, unless you count the attempt at lumping a variety of disparate categories together as "the manosphere." People also do this with the likes of Andrew Tate. Or as a non-criminal example, Jordan Peterson. None of these examples are comparable to the likes of Solanas, or Andrea Dworkin, or Sally Miller Gearhart, or Mary Daly, or paedophile sympathiser Simon…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:19 PM
6

It sounds like you are looking in the extremes of the internet. Feminist figureheads like Valerie Solanas and her "SCUM Manifesto" (i.e. Society for Cutting Up Men), and Sally Miller "The future is female" Gearhart (an idea achievable by reducing the male population to 10%) were espousing their poison long before the internet even existed. And that's just two.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:52 PM
15

Wow, one comment from "years and years ago" that received a whopping four upvotes. Clearly a fair representation of MRAs in the widest sense of the term. Meanwhile....
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:46 PM
14

Incels =/= MRAs. Just because troglodytes throw it around as an insult like it's going out of style doesn't make it factual.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:42 PM
13

Can you name any? As in leaders, activists, politicians, journos, etc.?
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:41 PM
-9

They're being sarcastic. Edit - Downvotes for pointing out an obvious troll?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/23 03:17 PM
39

Hillary Clinton is a silly lady.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/22 08:50 PM
5

In India feminist groups protested against making rape laws gender neutral, and won. I remember seeing it on another sub. Edit: I had the post saved. Here is the report.
/r/PussyPass15/06/22 07:15 PM
15

Just from a quick search, but this is from Rape Crisis UK: In England and Wales, the legal definition of rape is when someone intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with their penis, without the other person's consent. And I've seen before Scotland's rape law is much the same: (1)If a person (“A”), with A's penis— (a)without another person (“B”) consenting, and (b)without any reasonable belief that B consents, penetrates to >any extent, either intending to do so or …
/r/PussyPass15/06/22 06:48 PM
6

The paragraph in question certainly was simple. And deriding my intelligence when you were the one who responded with foul language, insults, and non sequiturs is pretty rich.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/22 06:07 PM
7

How are you this fucking dumb Pot, meet Kettle.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/22 05:51 PM
8

I reckon a guy his size could've easily laid out another dude, let alone a smaller woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/22 05:25 PM
16

Many studies on DV show that women are the ones who commit the majority of nonreciprocal violence, like this one. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Reciprocity was associated with more frequent violence among women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.9, 2.8), but not men (AOR=1.26; 95% CI=0.9, 1.7). Regarding injury, men were more likely to inflict injury than were women (AOR=1.3; 95% CI=1.1, 1.5), and …
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/22 05:23 PM
15

Here's an article about it which goes into some detail about its origins and how it works. AFAIK, it's practiced in America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. For further reading, there's also this study which explores how female focused initiatives like the Violence Against Women Act end up discriminating against male victims of violence. I've no idea why the Duluth Model doesn't get a mention but it goes into a bunch of other factors anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/22 05:08 PM
4

I think this is a comment on the fact that there's pretty much always an immediate concentration on hypothetical rape victims vs the actual victim of a false accusation in whichever case is being discussed. Often, the fact that the falsely accused individual is a victim of an injustice is all but glossed over in order to focus on the potential effects of the aforementioned hypothetical victims of rape and sexual assault. It's dismissive.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 07:15 PM
2

The comments on the main thread this was crossposted from is surprisingly not a dumpster fire.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 10:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter