TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

maywest Archive

View 7 posts and 130 comments by maywest on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

They got their digs in on AVFM but overall validated the MRM.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:30 PM
2

privilege don't real.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:08 AM
11

So you're going to literally blame the victim? It's his fault I guess? go moron somewhere else please.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 08:06 PM
2

Gay Malibu?? Wtf was I thinking when I wrote the title?
/r/MensRights14/05/12 06:28 AM
8

Yes, they did. They are in the business of finding groups of people to tell other people to be afraid of, that's how they get paid.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 01:53 AM
1

It's okay, it's just a joke like on topgear.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 08:32 AM
28

Saddened by the post, elated by all of the support, encouragement, and proper advice he received in the comments.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 05:27 PM
13

The thing is, and I know that you will find this difficult to believe, most of us aren't bad people, most of us don't "behave badly". There are twenty seven thousand readers of this sub, most of us don't "believe it's our right to be creepy", most of us don't disparage women, gays, or transgendered, most of us don't believe that rape or a sexual assault of any kind is ever acceptable. Most of us really do want exactly the same egalitarian things that people you support want. But instead of talki…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:36 AM
-3

But you're cool with "Hetero white cisgendered men GET OUT!" right? Quit changing the subject and missing the entire point of what's being discussed.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 05:59 PM
3

I think this is a really good idea for areas that could draw a crowd, like a real crowd, at least 200+, otherwise it will look silly and detractors gonna detract. Solid idea, something I would take part in.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:55 PM
6

I agree. Obvious troll is obvious but there's no reason to believe they're a feminist. And Aerik is correct again in asserting that this is precisely why mr is easily trolled. I'm not saying feminists never troll us but this troll is going for that negative karma award hard.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 11:48 PM
1

*Kool-Aid
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:49 AM
1

Where have you seen the original book? As rantgrrl pointed out here apparently no one else has.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 08:52 PM
2

And this nullifies the part of my reply which you quoted how exactly? That may very well be your own well thought out opinion but in stating it you have done nothing to convince me that I am incorrect in my assertion that it is neither an accepted or necessary article of christian faith. I don't believe that most christians believe semen to be evil and deny that such a postulation by Augustine constitutes a cornerstone of western theology or enjoys mainstream acceptance by people whom identify a…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 08:24 PM
1

Augustine converted to Christianity and is considered one of the fathers of the reformation but this is the first time I have heard of him referred to as "the founder of the Church". I'm not arguing that his writings did not have influence on western theology but I doubt that there are many christians today who are even aware of this postulation. You do not have to consider your semen evil in order to accept christianity and I would postulate that most christians do not.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:59 PM
0

So it's not a commonly held belief that makes misandry a prerequisite of accepting Christianity. It was Augustine postulating , thanks.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:34 PM
4

I have never heard that before. Is it a commonly accepted belief?
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:14 AM
1

He turned his flair off. Aerik really is not a troll. He's just an innocent cherry picker.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:16 AM
9

How Everyone Pictures You.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 08:02 AM
3

meh, just foreseeing twitter trolls or the accusations of them. Cheers.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:43 AM
3

All I see is angry little blocks of text, Aerik is still angry blocks of text to me. Also, unless Aerik has posted that blog and twitter ... maybe .. remove the links to avoid a shitstorm? I understand that you're not exactly 'outing' them but either link could contain personal information.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:04 AM
3

It's a statement by kloo2yoo attributed to kloo2yoo, it is an opinion and is not hateful or offensive. Why do you feel it should be removed?
/r/MensRights02/10/11 11:44 PM
4

All we know is that based on Aerik's flair in /amr Aerik is 'not a lady'. That doesn't necessarily make Aerik a dude. I like to think of Aerik in terms of an angry little block of text that is most often incorrect in whatever it is asserting.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 09:37 PM
0

LOL, they might be trolls = ban them, sock puppet = ban them, oppressive speech = ban them, said something mean = ban them, polite disagreement = ban them, posted something we didn't like in another sub-reddit = ban them. Forum moderation is easy.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 08:05 PM
2

It is always more noble to defeat violence with comedy rather than with better violence.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 10:12 AM
1

For another thing there's no popular reddit called /mensrights that posts about eeeevil women all day.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 12:40 AM
1

Hopefully this will keep the readers of those two subs busy downvoting each other.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 12:38 AM
1

Lol, obviously not an accusation : people are trying to take the piss with you by cherry picking and decontextualizing/reframing this comment as that is something a lot of us believe you have done with this sub in the past. I'm not accusing you of anything. I'm trying to give you perspective, I don't think anyone really thinks you're an anti-semite. I'm not going to look through your blog for evidence of an accusation I didn't make. I've attempted to communicate with you that I am not attacking …
/r/MensRights01/10/11 12:24 AM
1

First off, I am not suggesting that you are in any way an anti-semite or that you intended your comments to be anything more than a joke. Neither am I suggesting that you're a villain, just trying to give you my perspective on why you are experiencing the animosity. You asked an honest question, I gave you an honest answer. Again, I'm not trying to state that no MRAs believe in a feminist conspiracy, as I conceded in my reply some obviously do, nor am I attempting to defend any other comment tha…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 11:52 PM
1

Honest answer here : The sarcastic comment is both dismissive and an act of shit slinging. Most of your comments in this sub are not offensive they're just largely irrelevant to the discussions taking place and often seen as, at least by myself, pointless and/or intentionally distracting. Your attempt to manufacture a correlation between someone suggesting that 'feminists' might be contributing to the undermining of /mr and someone accusing 'jews' of everything for the purpose of joke is just si…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:30 PM
1

Honest question : Can you please point me to an article or paper that adequately discusses these kinds of privilege?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:32 PM
2

and she was around 135lbs, into sports, outdoorsy, great sex...the whole package. She was "the whole package" to him, everything he was looking for in a mate. Her lifestyle, interests, looks, everything changed and it's not that he merely finds her unattractive it's that all of those things changed and she is a different person with different interests. He clearly feels that they are no longer compatible, not that she is just 'unattractive', he clearly states that that is the interpretation of t…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:28 PM
0

I'm really not trying to be a dick here I swear ;-) Someone who just avoids violence is someone who just avoids violence - pacifism is opposition to ever using force regardless of the circumstance. Not using violence all willy nilly but being prepared to commit violence should you decide the situation calls for it is not pacifism, it's being a normal human. Most people are not violent psychopaths that doesn't mean we have to identify as pacifists. Cheers.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:50 PM
1

Pacifism : The belief that war and violence are unjustifiable under any circumstances, and that all disputes should be settled by peaceful means. It does necessarily mean that. If you would defend with violence you are not a pacifist.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:31 PM
2

TIL wanting a loved one to be healthy rather than unhealthy and attempting to get them to engage in healthy lifestyle activities with you rather than wallowing in junk food and inactivity is badgering, obnoxious, and passive-aggressive.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:22 PM
2

Are you guys really pacifists or just, you know, normal dudes who don't start shit? Most people don't become extremely violent when they drink alcohol. Most people would still use violence appropriately to defend themselves or someone else. A pacifist would sit there. Pacifism is dangerous.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:13 PM
1

Sorry, I guess I phrased that really poorly, I was tired ;-) What I was attempting to ask was since you appear to believe that male to female transpersons exist in our current structure as women with male privilege do you also believe that female to male transpersons can exist within this structure as males without male privilege?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:26 AM
3

I think I understand what you're saying, it's an attempted defense of queercoup's offensive belief which they phrased offensively. I don't agree with the idea but your interpretation of queercoup's words were definitely a lot less offensive than they intended. Do you believe that FTM tanspersons exist as males lacking male privilege?
/r/MensRights29/09/11 09:38 AM
5

Similarly Aerik, Everyone who opposes you or your bullshit moderation party is a troll or sock puppet. Give it a rest.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:37 PM
1

We've both made our arguments multiple times phrased in multiple ways and we're getting nowhere, I'm glad that we both support equality and I am an ally of anyone who supports equality regardless of terms or titles, and have a nice day.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 12:48 AM
1

Yes, I assure you, you are missing a point. The point is that I'm not arguing with you about what feminism is or how it is defined, I'm arguing that for one to be a feminist they have to accept feminism as their motivation. This is something that all feminists do. If one does not accept feminism as their motivation they are not a feminist even if they do things that are in line with feminism or beneficial to it's causes. You completely ignored : Feminists are "person[s] whose beliefs and behavio…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 07:51 PM
1

Don't blame me if the world doesn't go the way you want it to. Yes... er... totally what I've been doing, not ... trying to have a conversation with you or anything ... You can try to antagonistically 'educate' me about what feminism is all day if you want to but the fun fact remains that Feminists are "person[s] whose beliefs and behavior[s] are based on feminism." The point that you seem to be intentionally missing is that some people want equal rights for all people and don't want to be femin…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:43 PM
1

Yes, downvote everything we don't agree with. Also, doesn't look like there's too much gender diversity in the The Student Federation of the University of Ottawa. I think some genders may be underrepresented.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:32 AM
2

And you're confusing ideology and activism =) Feminism is a specific and encompassing ideology, feminist is a title used to describe a person who accepts that specific encompassing ideology. If a person does not accept that title it generally means that they do not accept that specific and encompassing ideology. Many ideals that are accepted by feminism are not exclusive to it, many people who are not feminists agree with feminists on many issues - that does not make them feminists. I am not a f…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:59 PM
2

Being called a feminist is neither a compliment nor an insult, it is a title used to describe a person who accepts a specific encompassing ideology. If a person does not accept that title it generally means that they do not accept that specific and encompassing ideology. Many ideals that are accepted by feminism are not exclusive to it, many people who are not feminists may agree with feminists on many issues that does not make them feminists. I am not a feminist and I have contributed to femini…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:23 PM
3

I don't understand if you are calling me a feminist or disagreeing or agreeing with me. Please clarify.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:47 PM
5

Nobody is saying she is claiming anything. I'm just pointing out, a fortiori, that if she fights against discrimination against women, then she's a feminist. False, I fight against discrimination against women and I'm not a feminist. Merely fighting against discrimination against women does not make one a feminist. That is not a fortiori that is your personal opinion regarding what makes a feminist.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:36 PM
8

Just because she doesn't call herself a feminist doesn't mean she isn't one. Just because feminism wants to claim her doesn't mean that she has to claim it. One does not have to be a feminist in order to examine statutes and pick out and try to change the ones which were discriminatory. She said she doesn't call herself a feminist.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 08:38 PM
3

Lol, I didn't dv your other comment but I sincerely laud this one.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 09:56 PM
4

No but maybe your analogy is not being lauded in this thread because it is kind of obscure and because it adds nothing to the discussion that's going on. If your analogy was used to offer a counter to their opinion rather than just as an excuse to make a joke you might well have received delicious upvotes instead.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 09:15 PM
1

I DON'T WANT NO ONE TELL'IN ME HOW TO TALK
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:50 AM
3

No one thinks that you've made the mra movement look bad. You can't run the most unfriendly/noninclusive/attack/downvote sub on reddit and expect to be taken seriously when you tell others how to be more anything friendly. /mr is pretty inclusive and "friendly" to other views. This is evidenced by the fact that both you and thingsarebad are giving opinions in this thread that are not in line with what the majority of us believe.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:45 AM
1

I thought saying ppl were pathetic and hopeless was the wrong way to go? I tagged on your closing line to demonstrate that ending a post in which you claim you are only trying to help by swearing and calling someone pathetic/hopeless is needlessly antagonistic and silly - they are your own words Aerik - if you are going to attempt to take issue with them you are going to have to take issue with yourself. You constantly claim that you are holding a mirror up to others so that they can see their e…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 11:28 PM
5

THAT'S SEXIST!
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:14 PM
3

It is more important to the ideals of freedom and equality to protect unpopular and inciteful speech than it is for a governing body to protect people's feelings or to get all parental on them and protect them from something that might happen as a result. I think you misunderstand your opposition. People don't want no limits on speech because they want to insult and degrade others. They want to ensure true free speech exists because it's important to be able to communicate unpopular ideas. Ideas…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 07:54 PM
4

The term masculism is now emasculating.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 07:30 AM
11

Who are you talking to? What are you talking about? You don't just not degrade other human beings simply because it harms them you also don't degrade other human beings because you recognize yourself as a human being and recognize human beings of being worthy of not being degraded. The fact that anyone making such comments also makes the men's rights movement as a whole look bad is also of concern to the readers of this subreddit but it is certainly not the primary reason those comments are bad …
/r/MensRights22/09/11 06:45 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights22/09/11 03:45 AM
5

Well, no but i think it contests the claim "posts sexist stuff, gets banned, complains on r/mensrights" - Whether r/AMR wants to claim to be egalitarian or not is of little concern to me, I would argue that the moderation of r/AMR is definitely not in line with what I view as egalitarian in that people are called trolls, sexists, and misogynists and banned for politely disagreeing with something that a mod believes and some times for nothing at all.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:44 AM
8

I would agree with you that just stating "Most of the irritating people in the world are women" would be misogynist but that's not what the OP did. Whether you agree with their point or not they were not making a misogynist claim they were pointing out that they believed that making the one statement is equatable with making the another statement. Do you not agree with this assessment?
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:28 AM
7

Do you consider the OP's linked comment sexist? Stating that it's wrong to say X because it's like saying Y and both X and Y are wrong? The comment was made to illustrate that saying most of the world's maniacs have been men is just as silly as saying most of the world's irritating people have been women. Only someone denying context completely would call that post sexist and the OP even quoted the bit about male maniacs so that the context of his comment would be preserved. What is your sexist …
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:09 AM
10

WE NEED TO SAVE THE DELICIOUS ATTENTION FOR OURSELVES!
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:00 AM
1

Come on, you manly men you. That's me, yay Are we tricking you into saying this shit? Are we forcing you to do it somehow? Nope, I never say things like that. And even you have to admit that out of the 26,287 readers of this sub most people don't. I know you are taking issue with the language that poster used to voice their opinion but if you look past your offense at the uncouth term "cunthole" the person is actually stating that no, this is not a case of feminists attacking men it's a case of …
/r/MensRights22/09/11 12:47 AM
1

I've actually had some pretty decent discussion there and had my comments remain in the +. For the most part, I enjoy r/srs, I don't necessarily agree with a lot of comments but then again, there's a lot of stuff posted to /mr and /starcraft that I don't agree with either. I haven't got flare yet tho =(
/r/MensRights21/09/11 11:33 PM
2

But in srs you can actually make comments and have discussions with people without being banninated.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 11:04 PM
1

hmm.. I got banned there today as well. Funny, because the only thing I've posted there recently was a clarification on a sun tzu quote which I sourced. I messaged the mod and asked for a review of the ban.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 11:00 PM
2

Just because it's linked on the sidebar doesn't mean that everyone's seen it. If you missed it, I'm sure other people have too. good linkage.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 07:53 PM
2

I tried to start an egalitarian down/upvote brigade and I only got four readers :(
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:23 AM
2

I try to understand Aerik and MuForceShoelace.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:17 AM
5

I think it depends on how you feel about the poopie. Don't let MRAs tell you what to believe about your own shit.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 01:52 AM
1

*metaphysically
/r/MensRights21/09/11 01:32 AM
11

No one is suggesting that the comment is a "fraudulent rape accusation" except for you Aerik. No one is arguing that it's not facetious but rather that the flippant facetious comment is out of place, antagonistic and sigh offensive. The irony here is that you are, again, projecting your misguided, hypocritical logic on people who disagree with you. You've recently acted highly offended at some of Ann's facetious comments. Although the comments were facetious you rallied against them calling them…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 07:39 PM
50

aaaaaaannnnnnddddd way to lose the assumed moral high ground in your argument against Ann as a mod.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:16 AM
-1

They should be identified because they have announced that it is their mission and intent to 'dismantle' r/mr.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 11:03 PM
1

I think they're attempting to equate it with the behavior of the mods of /anarchism/metanarchism/etc
/r/MensRights19/09/11 10:52 PM
10

Feminism and the feminist movement are not synonymous with rights for women. That's like saying that opposing PETA means opposing animal rights.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 05:22 AM
4

So what you're saying is that you're way more alpha than him?
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:51 AM
0

Although I disagree with your definition of terms, I don't disagree with your mod actions. It is not my prerogative to have you delete anything because I consider it trolling but rather to call a troll a troll. How would you suggest that I "learn to argue against the message" when the only message being put forth is muforce asking Ann a stupid question and then linking it to AMR? This is trolling. An attempt to derail normal discourse with threads that add nothing to the discussion and attempt t…
/r/MensRights18/09/11 10:28 PM
-1

I understand that you are trying to be impartial here but there is a difference between someone posting antagonistic and/or critical comments for the purpose of discussion and a troll posting antagonistic and/or critical comments in order to troll. This is a post from a troll who's stated purpose is to dismantle MR not simply an antagonistic or critical comment.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 10:05 PM
15

Well, muforceshoelace and Aerik have not given him permission to be a mod of MR so obviously he shouldn't be, if he's made a mod we've all failed privilege 101.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 10:00 PM
-11

No, plz pick a side thnx.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:53 AM
1

Seriously though, I'm sure that you have the support of the majority of this community by a wide margin. I don't think that a new mod must be added just because one left. The modding in /mr has always been consistent. Cheers.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 11:35 PM
3

I, FOR ONE, WELCOME OUR NEW "PRO-FEMINIST" OVERLORD
/r/MensRights31/08/11 09:54 PM
3

You deserve time away form this bullshit. You were a good general, you always served well - You will be missed.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 09:51 PM
2

So then are you stating that my original response to your originally posed question is correct? If no females on the earth believed that males could be rape victims, males should still care about female rape victims because we know that females can be rape victims.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 09:40 PM
1

My point is that people holding incorrect beliefs is not justification for someone else to hold equally incorrect beliefs. I never said it was. From the post that dragged me into this regrettable exchange with you : So, here's the question. If feminists minimize, victim-blame and ignore male rape victims, why should men care about female rape victims? U TROLLIN BRO? in your example feminists take a position that is incorrect therefore MRAs should take a position that is incorrect to counter it.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:51 PM
2

Why on earth would I do that? My point is that people holding incorrect beliefs is not justification for someone else to hold equally incorrect beliefs. You'll keep saying "but they hold incorrect beliefs" I'll keep saying "so" This is an inefficient use of our time and resources.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:28 PM
2

Cheers. I'm glad that /mr has pleased you.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:13 PM
3

yeah because that logically follows ... Let's look at one of them, shall we? Even if every man on earth didn't care about women, women should still care about men. With that you've moved so far away from the original discussion that it's futile for me to argue. I am still discussing your original hypothetical, you are now attempting to further argue your non-point without addressing my actual argument. If you really want a response to that I'll state : Every A on earth not caring about Bs would …
/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:04 PM
0

I know that you're attempting some sort hypothetical to show a double standard but even stating that is just silly. You lose the ability to discuss equality when you start playing two wrongs make a right. To argue that because someone you don't agree with believes something that is false and adheres to a shitty worldview because of it SO THEREFORE you should also believe something that is false and adhere to a shitty worldview is the stupidest hypothetical argument that can be made. Indulging hy…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 07:38 PM
4

Through the conservation of angular momentum. See this Universe Today article for more information.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 04:08 AM
2

The earth orbits around the sun.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 09:03 PM
0

That comment was ableist. I just learned that word and got to call you it.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 09:02 PM
34

I love how you didn't make an actual comment or judgement on the topic, did not attempt to discuss your argument or position with others, and just spewed petty bullshit. Also, you failed to disclaim being a pedophile as well, as someone who is not a pedophile I find this highly suspicious.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 06:34 PM
1

Having said that I still think the linked article is dodgy.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 05:21 AM
2

You literally just used the word literally wrong.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 05:19 AM
8

Why oh why would you mix fractions and percentiles in your headline? Don't you mean the other 33.33333r %? But to answer your question, no. I consider Men's Rights to be a position not an all encompassing catechism of principles and precepts. I agree with Men's Rights. That doesn't mean that I don't disagree with men who also agree with Men's Rights when they say silly shit.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 12:57 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/metasexism/comments/jsere/ongoing_discussion_regarding/
/r/MensRights24/08/11 02:08 AM
1

I am aware that her posts were not the only one's deleted, my reasonable posts in that thread were deleted as well.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:11 PM
1

but lady catherine just posted to it ? I might be misunderstanding what's going on but I clicked the link in your post and saw new posts in the thread, can people comment on a deleted thread?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:04 PM
1

has the thread been restored?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:52 PM
2

cool story bro
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:45 PM
3

Actually, I do think about his side of things and his actions as I understand them are indefensible. Perhaps, it did "take two to tango", perhaps Rihanna took actions which I would find indefensible as well, this would in no way justify his actions. I do not know which actions Rihanna took so I cannot comment on her actions. Attempting to troll /mr with such a blatant example of domestic violence is just silly. /mr believes that all domestic violence is wrong regardless of who is committing it.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 07:41 PM
1

[Expected request for link/source/proof of claim]
/r/MensRights23/08/11 07:31 PM
1

I somewhat appreciate your effort in posting that but disagree that this is your only sock ;-)
/r/MensRights23/08/11 07:11 PM
1

So if people come here and troll, you downvote them and move on. They're not purporting to be MRAs, they're just posting links. People came to /mr posted links, then posted those submissions to /amr as an example of the bigotry, etc that they claimed perpetuated /mr . That is unacceptable, dishonest, slanderous, etc. They are not only attempting to pass as /mr they are attempting to have their passing portray /mr and define it. This is a huge difference from people "not purporting to be MRAs, th…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 07:06 PM
1

Of course not, that happened last week with all the shitty links and comments that were reposted to /amr, remember? As has been pointed out before, AMR is a drop in the bucket compared to the size of MR. Furthermore, you seem to be ignoring part: under the guise of being MRAs We don't pretend to be MRAs because we're not MRAs. I was ignoring nothing, last week there were multiple trolls posting to /mr then reposting the troll post to /amr if you wish to ignore this that's your choice. There's a …
/r/MensRights23/08/11 06:18 AM
1

So if this subreddit were being overwhelmed with feminists under the guise of being MRAs trying to take over your movement, you seriously wouldn't call for the ban of a single one? Of course not, that happened last week with all the shitty links and comments that were reposted to /amr, remember? Of course it is, because I never said that. I agree that I had misread your previous statement. I thought you were suggesting that /mr would call for the sub to be banned not the individual users. I, mys…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 04:22 AM
6

Is that your response? Do you realize that you are swarming a sub-reddit right now?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:54 AM
2

No, no one would be outraged and calling for bans, that's what /amr does. Suggesting that /mr would attempt to have a sub reddit cease to exist is intellectually dishonest and is easily disprovable. You are again projecting /amr's ultimate goal to have /mr cease to exist. No one is calling for /amr to banned in order to maintain the integrity of this sub-reddit. We realize that if we tried to get /amr banned we would lose integrity. There is however much discussion as to whether or not they shou…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:49 AM
5

one of the reasons /AMR was initially formed was because of accusations of this subreddit's many forays into other subreddits.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:37 AM
1

OH NOES! MuForceShoelace's clearly transparent poopslinging which culminated in a vain and self-serving attempt to argue against nazism instead of discussing the contents of a wall street journal article titled "College Rape Accusations and the Presumption of Male Guilt" have succeeded. I have been defeated by their poop =(
/r/MensRights22/08/11 10:17 PM
1

or an inability to take criticism.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 10:08 PM
1

I did not state that we should give attention to trolls. I stated that that troll does not have a point and that their argument is not based on logic. A sub reddit when being addressed with personhood is a collective made up of it's members and contributors. The purpose of this reddit is not to appeal to feminists. It is to help men find a voice and a community where they can explore the distrust and the anger they rightfully feel after being bashed as the dirty, nasty, unkempt, stupid, perverte…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 09:27 PM
2

No, that troll never has a point. This troll suggesting that because r/mensrights is reacting to repeated attacks and antagonism from a sub reddit that clearly states that their intention is to disable and destroy r/mensrights somehow proves r/mensrights to be anti-feminist is seriously laughable. That accusation literally makes no logical sense.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 08:24 PM
2

All of your comments in this thread have been very constructive, progressive, and in no way divisive. Do you realize how little weight your comments like "IMO you're just making it worse." hold when you look at your other comments in the thread above them? You have no desire to move forward, engage in discussion, or work together to solve problems. Come on, you're trying to take the moral high ground while attempting to create more petty bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:21 PM
1

There really needs to be an effort to bring the two sides together in discussion I often quote myself, it adds spice to conversation : The mods of that sub would rather drop the banner hammer than actually have a discussion that was not totalitarian in nature transpire in their little playground. They can excitedly post about equality, justice, or whatever else they wish but there is no debate or questioning allowed in /amr. They are supporters of "free discussion" ONLY if they control the free …
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:13 PM
5

That is also a discussion to have with our sons, very well put.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 04:04 AM
2

"you guys"? no, this is just me and that's not what I stated at all. Where have I defended neo-nazism and what are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:11 AM
0

No, Occidentalist is not a new national socialist in Germany. You constantly use the word literally incorrectly.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:25 AM
4

Please don't let them distract you and drag you into an endless myriad of nothingness. Occidentalist has some non-mainstream views regarding some topics and is rather blunt and unapologetic regarding them but he is not a neo-nazi by any stretch of the imagination. I believe he refers to himself as a paleoconservative - if you want more information regarding what beliefs that encompasses ask him, do not let someone who is obviously countering and attempting to subvert you dictate and define termi…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:23 AM
7

Everyone who disagrees with you on a race issue is a nazi. Everyone who disagrees with you on a sex issue is a sexist. It's not that we support nazis and sexists, it's that we disagree with your definition of both.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:09 AM
3

I often quote myself, it adds spice to conversation : The mods of that sub would rather drop the banner hammer than actually have a discussion that was not totalitarian in nature transpire in their little playground. They can excitedly post about equality, justice, or whatever else they wish but there is no debate or questioning allowed in /amr. They are supporters of "free discussion" ONLY if they control the free discussion which, of course, removes the possibility of any discussion. They are …
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:28 PM
4

We must accelerate the demise of anarchism to bring forth a new era of freedom!
/r/MensRights21/08/11 12:01 AM
1

I honestly think (hope?) that poster is a troll. Fresh reddit account, pointless and needlessly antagonistic responses ... and just completely cartoony opinions.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 12:00 AM
68

The mods of that sub would rather drop the banner hammer than actually have a discussion that was not totalitarian in nature transpire in their little playground. They can excitedly post about equality, justice, or whatever else they wish but there is no debate or questioning allowed in /amr. They are supporters of "free discussion" ONLY if they control the free discussion which, of course, removes the possibility of any discussion. They are supporters of equality only when they are the only one…
/r/MensRights20/08/11 11:33 PM
1

Can you get me unbanned in /amr?
/r/MensRights20/08/11 08:05 PM
1

It's not tolerated, just because everyone doesn't make a big show of condemning it doesn't mean that it is tolerated. downvote, next, What is this contradiction that brings you these minor lulz?
/r/MensRights13/08/11 09:55 PM
1

literally about downvoting rape jokes?
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:50 AM
2

Why do you dictate that we identify with this poster? Why should I be embarrassed that someone posted something to a sub that I read? You already seem to have called them out why do you feel you need us to do it again? Honestly.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter