TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mazzyTuff Archive

View 2 posts and 349 comments by mazzyTuff on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Red Pill TheorymazzyTuff/r/TheRedPill14/08/13 08:53 PM
1

mazzyTuff/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

It's interesting to see how reddit admins and mods are becoming further arms of propaganda. You can already see this happening with sensitive political issues like Israel's treatment of the Palestinean people. Reddit is really just a few steps away from being Fox News at this point.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 09:26 AM
1

Go to a fucking clinic. If you put your dick into a hole, you take a risk. Did you really think you weren't taking a risk? TRP isn't your problem OP. Your problem was you thought somehow TRP would make you immune to STDs.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 03:41 PM
0

TRP works. Play up to your own unique value. Find actors and people you resemble that are considered sex symbols. Now imitate their look. Cute and boyish usually requires a counter-balance so extra-masculine clothing while having a more feminine facial aspect ends up working pretty well.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 11:31 PM
-1

Godwin's law is not an actual fallacy. It's a meme. Shouting out Godwin's Law when someone makes an apt comparison is akin to shouting out "IM FIRING MAH LAZERS" then thinking the argument won.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 07:54 PM
1

I didn't ask you if you were afraid of values. I asked you to consider that your ideas on what is positive and what humanity flourishing are subjective. Doing "good" sounds great until you realize that even Hitler thought he was doing "good".
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 12:33 AM
6

Have you ever considered that "shaping" the world positively is an entirely subjective value based action?
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 08:47 PM
1

Very no. It makes you look try hard, and lets her know that you're the sort of guy who fucks and tells the world about it. A gentleman does not speak about what goes down in between the sheets.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 01:09 AM
8

Because raping a chick is not consensual sex, which is against the law. We have consensual sex.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/13 04:51 PM
3

It's amazing how many blue pillers are advocating for violence against women in that thread. Apparently for blue pillers, negging a woman is abuse, or having sex with a woman after she's had a drink is rape. But kidnapping and forcing yourself on a woman, totes okay to teach. Beating women. Also totally acceptable for blue pillers.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/13 05:35 PM
11

I'm not really surprised that the Blue Pill is promoting violence against women. The amount of hate blue pillers have towards women is sickening.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/13 02:50 PM
2

You can only experience life. Enjoy the good times when they are here. Deal the best you can when the bad times come. Life will be filled with countless obstacles and challenges. Persevere as long as you can through and and when you find something that brings enjoyment, enjoy it for as long as you are able to. Despite the fact you're perfectly aware the person you're with is someone who may fuck you over or leave the moment it is in her best interest, she hasn't yet. During the time you're with …
/r/TheRedPill13/11/13 01:09 AM
2

It's kind of incredible to watch blue pillers call us women haters when we express preference in the women we want to have intimacy with. It's kind of amazing because the blue pill is saying that they would rather have men be raped than allow men to express they find someone unattractive. This is exactly why the blue pill is so dangerous. It encourages young men and boys to normalize their rape experiences, and it encourages women to continue raping men. It's amazing how the Blue Pill and their …
/r/TheRedPill12/11/13 06:44 PM
3

Wouldn't actual feminist biological "truths" have to be identified first?
/r/TheRedPill12/11/13 06:18 PM
5

To be fair, it is pretty weak to complain about a woman being more successful. No one is complaining about a woman being successful. But to have your ego bruised because of someone else's success seems the opposite of what TRP is about. No one's ego is being bruised by anyone else's success. Alpha males should be secure enough that they aren't affected by other people's success or failures, no matter their sex. We aren't talking about alpha males being secure about THEMSELVES. We are talking abo…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 12:20 AM
10

Sadly, the feminist/blue pill reaction to this is: "Waah, poor men crying that women are leaving them for more successful dudes. Look at these pathetic men who can't keep up a woman's level success. You better man the fuck up and stop being a cry baby about being such a shitty human being creepbag." No one ever mentions, men might feel insecure in their relationship with a more successful woman because a large amount of the female population judges the worth of their partner based on their level…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 06:58 PM
30

This is a huge example of blue pill behaviour right here. These are the people we are dealing with. This is why the red pill is eternal.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 03:56 AM
1

Not lies. He was against posters that railed against women to not be that girl (who abandons their children in dumpsters. Something women make the majority of). His reason: Men's rights. As though if MRAs were against racism, he would be for it. Not really surprising given feminism's actual racism issue. solidarityisforwhitewomen
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:12 PM
1

It shall forever be known that Manboobz does not believe a man being forced to penetrate a woman is rape. Because a woman would never hold a knife to your neck and force you to engage in intercourse ever. Saying forced to penetrate isn't rape is like saying gay marriage isn't marriage. A rape is a rape is a rape. Fucking bigot. Not only this, he's a dude who actually defends the act of women dumping babies into dumpsters. Apparently this is something he believes is worth fighting for. Women dump…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 03:39 AM
4

this entire discussion is pointless. Why does Nomenimion like having pointless discussions?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:45 PM
2

1) location + logistics Most hot girls are in large cities in which there is a career for them in which to paid to be beautiful. You need to live in a downtown city center that has an industry for furthering these sorts of women. There are only 2-3 cities that meet these criteria in Canada. Toronto, Montreal, and possibly Vancouver. Do you live there? 2) job type Most hot girls are interested in dudes who can further their career or social status. Millionaire grandpas and unemployed djs do that …
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 09:42 PM
7

everybody falls for someone who plays coy; Nope. I've had girls do this, and I've rejected them outright.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 05:49 PM
1

There is no zone of friendship. A girl who does not respect me sexually enough to have sex with me or hook me up with an available female friend is no friend of mine. Friendship is earned, not given.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 08:33 PM
1

Alas: for some people, you're not a man unless you're either gay or take a peg.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 04:06 PM
1

Absolute state reality definition
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 06:58 AM
6

Some men would rather not have things shoved in them. Because of abuse.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 06:52 AM
4

Can reality exist outside your perception?
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 06:09 AM
1

I disagree. Bonds exist between no one. All that exists is the perception of a bond.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 01:09 AM
24

This reminds me of some of the talk from Blue Pillers, where they claim the only reason most men do not like pegging is because they're not secure enough in their masculinity. Because in the world of feminism, if you're a REAL man, you'll man up and take a peg.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 12:58 AM
2

presumed that there are hypocrisies No. You're using it wrong. It's for proven hypocrisy. Isn't that pretty much what the women do? You mean "SOME" women. Especially if you feel this: I'm not saying not to use the term, but maybe we should make sure to be extra self aware when we do? Try to be a little EXTRA self aware. They both seem possibly dangerous because they both end in you deciding to just ignore what the other person has to say. The use of mansplaining is used to silence opinion. The u…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 12:55 AM
10

The thing is: Mansplaining is a term used to silence debate, and used to silence men specifically. Hamstering is a gender neutral term used when a calling out someone's hypocrisies. The two are vastly different in application and usage.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 12:00 AM
7

This is what "debating" means to Blue Pillers apparently.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 08:21 PM
0

Yep. Continue not existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/13 03:15 PM
0

Actually, this is totes awesome. I'm stealing this argument forever. So if a feminist advocates raping (e.g. Hugo Schwyzer), it would be impossible to claim they don't understand feminism (since there is no unified theory of what is and isn't feminism). Therefore feminism is for rape. So if a blue piller advocates raping , it would be impossible to claim they don't understand blue pill (since there is no unified theory of what is and isn't blue pill). Therefore feminism is for rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/13 02:15 PM
0

Don't worry champ. One day you'll believe in yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/13 01:57 PM
5

Ah, as per always, TBP jumps at the opportunity to put rape into everything. This is like saying, since there's no agreed on unified theory of everything, a scientist advocating for raping his wife represents science.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/13 01:32 PM
4

FINALLY SOMEONE GETS IT! So much this. There is no one united theory of TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/13 06:52 AM
6

Scientifically, what is a slut? Sluts don't exist. It's just people having fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/13 06:29 AM
-1

Do you believe I exist? (If not, to whom are these arguments being made?)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/13 05:50 AM
-1

Interesting. So then you would say there is no relationship between your current position in the universe and my current position?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/13 05:40 AM
17

Elite anglo-feminists ignoring minority cultures and telling them what to do?!? Clearly #solidarityisforwhitewomen It never surprises me when some elitist woman wants to pass her "superior" moral judgement on a whole functioning culture on how they "REALLY" should be. Don't worry, the mother goddess is here to tell you how to live since you've been doing it so wrong.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 05:38 AM
-10

Looks like more advice ripped directly from blue pillers. Sorry, but if you think this is what TRP is, you are blue pill as fuck.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 12:55 AM
3

Bad is totes a moral value judgement. What's "good" for me may be "bad" for you. Part of TRP is realizing that society is set up to make all people ashamed of self-interest. To be called a dick while in pursuit of my own goals is a complete compliment as far as I am concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/13 11:56 PM
1

Being a dick is an effective RP strategy. ;P
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/13 11:40 PM
0

Feminists/BP are suggesting to me that rape and kidnapping is a more effective strategy than game.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 10:44 PM
-3

You are correct in that nothing was taught. I refused BP Rape and Kidnapping education, in the same way I would refuse a drug pusher. Just because I did not buy drugs, does not mean that drugs were not offered for sale. In the same vein, just because I was not educated in being a rapist does not change that education in becoming a rapist was offered. We can doubt all we want, but we can only make judgements based in objective reality. Whether or not it was a thought experiment does not change th…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 10:34 PM
-3

The person's was willing to educate me on how rape and kidnapping was more effective. For this BPer, teaching people how to rape and kidnap was worth it just to make a point. It's part of TBP's constant cognitive dissonance. Rape and kidnapping instruction is alright as long as they're the ones doing it.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 10:12 PM
-1

I use game. I don't need to kidnap or rape, as some BPers have.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 10:07 PM
3

http://imgur.com/QmdjmGX
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 09:58 PM
4

A string of insults is representative of the views of TRP? By this logic, the views of the American public can be represented by Rush Limbaugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/13 09:42 PM
2

They believe that rape and kidnapping is a more effective sexual strategy than using game, and some BP members were willing to teach rape strategy to Red Pillers provided that the Red Pillers would use their rape strategies. I had one BPer begging to teach me how they would rape and kidnap women.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 09:27 PM
8

It is straight up Blue Piller self-projection. It's doubly amusing since in my discussions with BPers and feminists, their "alternative" to game IS kidnapping and rape. That's right, for a blue piller, negs are totally horrible. But kidnapping and rape are more effective options. We really shouldn't be surprised by the BP response though considering famous BPers like Hugo Schwyzer are actual rapists. It seems the BP manginas are totes cool with rape, provided the girl doesn't say anything about …
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 07:39 PM
3

This reads like a Blue-Piller's interpretation of the Red Pill.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 06:02 PM
3

One learns when speaking of unpopular ideas to expect downvotes. I don't really mind the downvotes. It just further confirms the Red Pill reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/13 04:40 PM
0

I've already pulled empathy out of you. You do have morals Recognition of the conceptual experience of emotion in others does not denote morals. Nice try. All human action has morality. What moral action does breathing have? Blinking? Sneezing? I'm exposing your inconsistencies. You mean attempting, correct? Actually, The Red Pill does deal in hypotheticals. What Red Pill members talk about regarding hypotheticals only represents their own view points. It does not represent the actual Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/13 06:12 PM
1

A consistent morality. The Red Pill has many contradictions that it simply has hamster it away. TRP has a consistent morality of amorality. The individuals of TRP are up to decide their own morality. Nice try though. From what I've gathered from you, there's nothing more Red Pill than rape without getting caught because you get all the sex you want with no commitments, all the dominance, and no consequences. You really like pretending as though TRP's focus is living in a mysterious hypothetical …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/13 06:10 PM
1

I don't know where you got the idea I was here to give you dating advice. Thank you for confirming that TBP has no alternative to TRP. Oh wait, did you read the thread title? And again, it's not testing rape- it's testing amorality of sexual strategy. Right. TBP's objection to TRP is morality. So what morality DOES TRP need? What morality would result in getting the results TRP wants? Is TRP not made up of bad horrible people? Does that mean TRP is made up of good awesome people? Do you agree wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/13 09:57 PM
2

You claim all sexual strategy is amoral. The best way to test that is to take an extreme; rape in this example. I am glad to see that TBP still believes the best way for testing sexual strategy is to use an extreme such as rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/13 09:07 PM
9

Do you think marriage is ever worth it? Nope. Relationships exist through continued interaction, they do not need formalization. Can you believe in love and subscribe to TRP at the same time? Love is totally an emotion that can be experienced. Though what much of society teaches of love is very far from what love is. Red pill is just living in reality. Is shit testing conscious or subconscious or a little of both? Both. Is shit testing bad or is it necessary? Eh. It's just a thing. Everyone is g…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 04:50 AM
2

Very red pill. It's actually amazing how many red pill theories this fills. He's so bad. But the girl responds constantly to his dominance even though he has no direction whatsoever. It's like his dominance creates a situation for this girl where she just does whatever he says. But he also has no clue what the fuck he's even doing so it's just. So much red pill more needed
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/13 06:59 AM
0

How silly. Once you take the red pill, it's too late to go back.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 09:08 PM
13

The right to have their rape actually be called rape. In most places forced envelopment is not considered to be rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/13 04:24 AM
3

I've field tested Cesar's stuff, and it definitely works. Sadly, those techniques will only get you so far. Once you're married, you're a slave, and no amount of game will stop the power of a bitch who has the government on her side.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:13 PM
1

Can you instruct me, and provide legal guidance to me, and assist me in doing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/13 07:59 PM
1

start with David Parker Ray. Yes. Ending up in prison is definitely success.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/13 05:59 PM
0

Rape is easier than game because it's all the "benefits" (TRP seems to believe that getting laid is the only worthwhile endeavor in life, no?) with none of the "work". If you're truly looking for highest payoff (in terms of sex) with the least amount of work and didn't think women's feelings on the subject matter, then I can't possibly fathom how you would be opposed to rape as a sexual strategy. Yes. You keep saying rape is easier than game. But I don't see how it is at all. I don't think it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/13 02:15 PM
2

That is a very red pill thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/13 06:24 AM
1

I see Blue Pillers have a very interesting definition of fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/13 09:44 PM
1

I'm curious. What happens when you assume something?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/13 09:23 PM
1

Yes. Learning a new language, and putting myself into a culture that abhors the West is definitely the sort of place I want to be. I'm sure those are places where one can get away with rape. However I'm also sure the people in those cultures would not let a westerner rape their women and get away with it. Also: What's up with the TBP's insistence that rape is easier than game? You're like the third BPer that's suggested raping is better than gaming. Does TBP know that rape is easier than game fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/13 02:53 PM
2

What do you even mean by "valid"? Does it result in sex? Yes. Can it result in pregnancy? Yes. Will you be arrested? Most likely so. It's a valid sexual strategy, but it's not a legal one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/13 02:16 PM
0

Empathy isn't a feeling. The ability to recognize feelings is empathy. The red pill discusses reality. Since violent rapes do happen in reality, TRP makes discussion on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/13 03:11 AM
16

Red Pill Pro-Tip: If someone is flirting with you on reddit, YOU AREN'T PUTTING YOUR DICK INTO REAL VAG.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 02:30 AM
2

No. The discussion of violent rape as a sexual strategy is totally red pill. But the discussion is usually around the lines of. "Yes. You can violently rape a woman... and then get arrested followed by imprisonment." There is nothing so "offensive" that we would not talk about it. We would talk about it in the realm of noting: "Hey, you know, raping was actually a reproduction strategy some humans have used in the entirety of the history of humanity! It resulted in children being born." Because …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/13 02:24 AM
0

The thing is though, I've seen NLP practitioners actually get the results they were looking to get from using it. Some of the creepiest shit I have ever witnessed was from watching NLP'ers get girls to mirror their behaviour, and start rocking back and forth like a pendulum as he induced the girls into trance. I am aware it's not scientific, but something definitely is going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/13 02:12 AM
1

What's the rationale for claiming you Generally, I don't criticize non-harmful behavior. While also criticizing my use of "hamstering". A term I am using to describe your ability of thought, when you are a male. I am using a non-gendered term. You are the one applying gender to it. This is inherently transphobic as it implies one gender is more capable of hamstering than the other. Luckily you, my brave male, has proven to use men too are equally capable of hamstering. Thank you for making this …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/13 01:46 AM
0

but I don't think it accurately represents the state of their subreddit. Reddit is not a free speech zone. The rules of Reddit require a Red Pill subreddit to follow the rules of Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/13 08:33 PM
-1

It really just means: Don't judge Red Pill posts on a moralistic basis, but rather, judge Red Pill posts on their effectiveness, cost-benefit ratio, risk, or any number of objective factors. 1) Is it possible to ever say "this is wrong and we should not associate with it" or does TRP have a built in disposal for all such concerns? Is it wrong objectively? That is the only wrong that matters in regards to TRP. 2) Homophobia, and the idea that rape should not be a crime, are apparently tolerable e…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/13 04:10 PM
0

I sadly was not there in person to verify the validity of the claims of those practitioners.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/13 01:29 PM
0

Self-improvement. Yes. You're doing things for your self. Your own benefit. Not her benefit, or anyone else's benefit. You take action for your OWN benefit. Your own sake. That's the definition of selfishness. The only thing self-ish really means is that you're undertaking action in which you are acting in what you believe your best outcome would be.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 08:20 AM
1

That's nice. Please say hello to your partner for me. So why aren't you criticizing her? Do you feel her behaviour was beyond reproach and you would recommend that all people including your SO to follow that woman's behaviour?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/13 09:01 PM
2

A lie, if not discovered, is the truth as far as anyone is aware. Alpha in this context means, someone who is able to control the other. Guess what. Tons of alphas lie about shit. Politicians, businessmen, bankers, drug dealers, thugs. If you have not met these sorts of dark triad alphas in your life, you are sheltered as fuck. It's the rare alpha who's actually honest. The average natural alpha "person", is usually also filled with prolific lies about himself/herself, and uses it to obtain what…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/13 06:30 PM
10

You do realize, this woman is just taking RP ethos, and using it to get what she's looking for. It's not any different than the dudes who read "How to fuck girls on POF/OKCupid" books, and apply that knowledge to get sex. Here's a solid Red Pill truth to take away from this: The people most satisfied by their relationships are the ones who are most selfish when it comes to love and romance.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/13 06:15 PM
0

Names do not denote gender. A name cannot decide someone's gender for them. Yes, there are many transphobes in society. It's unfortunate. It does not mean we should continue to enforce transphobic viewpoints by supporting studies that reinforce bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/13 01:27 PM
0

No, but where did I say it was cultural? Cool so we can't say that the reasons for the differences between the sexes is cultural. I'm not asserting it's cultural. Awesome. In science, it actually is. You have to prove that there's a basis for your assertion that things will remain the same in the future. Without a full understanding of the topic, you can't say for sure humans will "always be like this." Awesome. So saying the differences between the sexes is cultural is illogical. Thank you for …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/13 06:25 PM
0

And? Why can't that difference be cultural? Have they been proven to be cultural? I have no problem with people pointing out that there are minor very differences in behavior, For a heterosexual, the difference between sucking a dick, versus eating a vagina isn't really minor. But I am glad you feel that these differences are minor. but to assert that those psychological differences have a basis in biology Because asserting something is cultural is a way more valid assumption, despite lack of ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/13 06:11 PM
-1

Note: They did not see MEMBERS of the sexes. who was randomly assigned either a male or female name They saw names that "supposedly" are representative of different genders. Perhaps the bias isn't actually a GENDER bias as being suggested (as anyone of any gender can have any name). But actually a NAME bias. Guess what blue pillers, trans-women are women. Trans-men are men. This is easy enough to understand right? The idea that a name can be representative of gender is inherently transphobic. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/13 06:00 PM
0

The important part you missed however is: There is a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/13 05:48 PM
0

It can work on all people provided you're willing to use some brainwashing techniques. The Octoberman Sequence is a NLP game technique that's got quite a bit of infamy behind it. From what I've been told, essentially some members of a lair back in the day learned the Octoberman sequence, and started using it on a whole bunch of women. The effect was that when the woman would touch the door-knob of her apartment to leave, she'd be overcome with such fear that she couldn't leave. It took a better …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/13 03:30 PM
1

Offensive? You're hilarious. The fact remains, a blue piller was willing to instruct a red piller how to kidnap, if the red piller was willing to say he would be willing to use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/13 03:09 AM
0

Right. Teaching kidnapping over game is totally morally okay by the blue pill because it's an exception. It's funny how TBP can have so many "exceptions".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/13 10:48 PM
1

Just because A has property B does not mean that anything with quality B is an A. Alpha's having strong genetic lines does not mean that Beta's can't also have strong genetic lines. If a definitive property of A is B then things that lack B are not A. When a genetic line finishes then that specimen is the Omega, the end of the genetic line. So that would make Sir Issac Newton an Omega male. Rad to know. It's irrelevant though, since I'm almost certain at this point that you are only interested i…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/13 07:50 PM
22

Flip the genders!!! It started with a conversation between Dallas-based oil tycoon Tim Hall and his best friend. "He was crying over the phone, lamenting the fact that he didn't want to be known as the 'poor' oil tycoon," Hall told the Huffington Post. "I felt empathy for him and what he was going through ... But it triggered me in a personal way." Hall decided to find out why he had such a visceral reaction to his friend's comment, convinced that financial success had nothing to do with his val…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/13 06:27 PM
1

We do. I don't consider someone doing what makes them happy in life to be Omega at all. The ability to have the life you want, regardless of what others say about it is in my definition, super Alpha. If you need to have a genetic line to prove yourself as Alpha, then by definition, you're making alpha about genetic validation. The problem with this definition is that there's also actually many Beta males that actually have strong genetic lines. (See: Your average married dude.)
/r/TheRedPill27/09/13 06:17 PM
-1

For example, one TRP member claimed that if kidnapping and repeatedly raping a woman had a greater benefit to cost ratio (i.e. amount of sex and benefit to your life v.s. personal cost) than game, then he would do it. Of course that member couldn't actually show that it had a better cost ratio. Oh, did I mention that one particular member of TBP felt that teaching men how to kidnap rather than teaching them game was something they felt was okay? I wonder what sort of harm teaching men to rape an…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/13 05:56 PM
9

All the major Drug Lords and Mafia Bosses have been male. No. Women make some of the most dangerous drug lords and mafia bosses. http://www.mandatory.com/2012/07/27/the-most-notorious-female-drug-kingpins
/r/TheRedPill27/09/13 03:00 PM
1

If you need any outside validation to describe yourself as alpha, you're not alpha. Keep on trying though. Even WoW-raiding neckbeard beta bronies are capable of having offspring. It's not something to feel special about champ.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/13 02:35 PM
9

Right. So here's how it works. The dudes who are 30+ who are fucking 21 and under women don't talk about it all the time. Most social circles frown on older dudes sleeping with younger women. Social circles which do accept this are usually exclusive. Girls under the age of 21 often hide their relationships with dudes that are older, only sharing their relationship status if they're in a group of people who are accepting of this. The dudes who are 30+ who hook up with girls under 21 usually have …
/r/TheRedPill27/09/13 12:01 AM
6

Worth noting is that many of the people from anti-mra Reddits actually come in here, and make posts like that as to weaken the messages within the MRA communities. One must look at the message to be "moderate" with suspicion.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:23 PM
7

It often amazes me how in one thread TRP will scorns any man who wishes to raise a child that is not his or praises men who impregnate women whom some other man supports. Then in another thread will scoff at the idea that your offspring matter, only your life is of importance. How are these amazing? You have fathers that date back to the first single celled organism, their whole purpose in life was singularly to produce you. I am so certain my ancient biological ancestors were all like, "THIS MA…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/13 02:08 PM
8

Because of male Power + Privilege, men are incapable of having emotions of hurt on the level of severity that women have. When a woman hurts, it occurs in a world in which female hurt is normalized, and encouraged. When a woman hurts, it backs up the assertion that women are somehow weaker than men, so just by the very act of a woman being offended by anything, she is being oppressed by the patriarchy.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/13 05:52 AM
11

The endgame of game? The only endgame one can be concerned with is the end of their own existence. That's game over. Game exists as a way for making the time in between now and when we die filled with the relationships and interactions we desire in life. Ultimately, if you're happy, you've "won". Enjoy the decline as they say.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/13 07:21 PM
2

I'm not unhappy. I'm amused. For all the "moral" problems TBP has gone on about regarding TRP, it's ultimately giggle worthy to me to see "kidnapping" is honestly being advocated over "negging".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 07:14 PM
1

I've answered most of your questions. Since you actually offered to teach me how kidnapping is more sound than negging, I can only assume you believe that it's moral for you to teach people how to kidnap women. Thank you for letting me know how a Blue Piller's morality works.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 07:04 PM
1

While I don't care about morals, I am now asking you a question. So please answer the question. Do you feel like you would be violating your morals if you advised someone to kidnap instead of using negs, and it resulted in someone being kidnapped?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 06:36 PM
1

Wow. So you'd rather have Red Pillers use kidnapping instead of negs. It is good to know where Blue Pillers are coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 06:00 PM
1

Can you convince me that it's actually more sound than TRP's methods?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 05:18 PM
1

You seem to be well versed in kidnapping. Is this from experience or just anecdote? Why would you care if she gets injured or ill? If she dies you can just kidnap another woman. Additional risk of body disposal. This method is actually much more sound that what TRP is currently using (ignoring moral issues). I tend to disagree, but I'm no expert on kidnapping.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 04:45 PM
0

I use work to mean, "will this action result in the desired outcome". Many RPers find that paying for sex is the best cost to benefit ratio. Kidnapping a woman has a higher risk factor, in addition a higher cost to benefit ratio. One would require: A basement which cannot be escaped from, or accessed by the public. Time to kidnap someone Resources to keep that person fed Medical Knowledge or access to a criminal black market doctor (in case the kidnapped woman gets injured or ill.) The ability t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 03:18 PM
0

I'd have a problem, as from a seduction standpoint, not lying is easier than lying to get sex. Every lie that one creates, results in a lie that one must maintain. Pretending I'm a dude from another country would not actually help my game, and I don't see the point in working to maintain that many lies. In actual effectiveness v.s. effort, it's a lame strategy. Morally though, I don't care. The Red Pill does not care about morals. It only cares about, Does this work? How well does this work? Who…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 02:49 PM
17

This is actually a basic belief of a seducer. Women crave attention the same way that men crave sex. Cat-string theory was developed as a way to take advantage of this. By only giving a woman a little bit of your attention at a time, you make her earn it from you. The more you make her work for your attention the more you make her invest herself in you. The result of this is that she will see you as a high value male due to the amount of effort she had to invest to get your attention. Her hamste…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/13 02:37 PM
0

As morals are social constructs, I cannot use the word "okay". Not to mention, there are all sorts of different lies. Not all lies are made the same. For example, if a person had the common cold and was questioned if they were sick, but instead of coming clean that they had caught the common cold, mislead the other person into believing they were healthy. As your body is part of your self, you would be lying about yourself in order to have sex with another person. I would have no problem with th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 02:27 PM
0

What if you can't guarantee that the lie will not be exposed? There are no guarantees in life. Then is it okay to lie about yourself in order to have sex with someone? Okay is a moral judgement. Morals are social constructs. Therefore it's both okay, and not okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/13 12:59 AM
2

Looks like I lied. ;p
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 10:40 PM
2

Here is an interesting Ted Talk on this. http://youtu.be/nQcgD5DpVlQ
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 09:43 PM
0

If one claims to know something which they do not know as truth, and they convince others that their claim is so, then they have intentionally mislead people into believing that they do know. Thus, the first person to claim Geocentrism as fact mislead people intentionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 09:05 PM
0

The first person to claim Geocentrism as fact mislead people INTENTIONALLY. Reality is filled with possibility. It's okay, until it's no longer okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 08:55 PM
0

Geocentrism is a lie, as it required at least one person to intentionally mislead others that they knew the form of the universe. Those who spread Geocentrism after the initial lie were only spreading falsehood. Do you believe that it is okay to lie about yourself in order to have sex with someone? Yes. Why or why not? Lies don't always cause harm. Some lies can be beneficial or serve a purpose. Ultimately, one can only have the experience of the relationship. You are providing an experience to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 08:45 PM
0

Geocentrism wasn't a lie That which is not true, is false. Belief does not change something from being false. Emotions cause a physical effect on your body. Is that so? I was under the understanding that the physical effect is what caused the emotion. When you say Emotions are the product of chemicals in your brain The word product is being used to indicate "a result or consequence".' Thus it seems that you believe the chemicals cause the emotions, and not the other way around. Here is a Wikiped…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 08:20 PM
0

So the lie is not accepted by society, it's just not rejected because no one knows about it. If anyone knew it was a lie, it would probably be rejected. Yes. This is how lies work. A lie which has been accepted becomes the subjective truth of those who accept it. An example of this would be Geocentrism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentrism For those people who accepted Geocentrism, their "truth" was that the Earth was at the orbital center of all celestial bodies. Lying destroys this trust a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 07:59 PM
0

Morals are social concepts. Socials concepts do not exist in objective reality. You, on the other hand, do- as do I and all the rest of humanity. Can you prove to me that human beings have free will and that choice is not an illusion? You are making a pretty incredible claim here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 07:49 PM
-1

If you tell someone about your lie. Your lie has been found out. A lie which no one is aware of being a lie, is accepted until it has been shown to be a lie. Yes, because lying is usually bad. Bad? Bad in what way? Can you define "bad"? Your question has been answered in our previous correspondence. I apologize if you are unable to discern my answer due to it's complexity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 07:33 PM
0

Can bed bugs use computers?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 07:22 PM
0

Objectively, all behaviour is amoral. Morals only exist in subjectivity. Would you feel you have the authority to pass moral judgement on bed bugs which reproduce solely by traumatic insemination?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 06:55 PM
-2

Morals are social constructs. As such, morality judged by society either accepts or rejects behaviour on this basis. A lie that is not detected is accepted by society. Thus all lies that are that have not been proven as lies have been accepted morally by that society.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 06:44 PM
-1

In what context? If I was working as a spy, and I had to sleep with someone as part of my job, then I would have no moral qualms with lying about myself to sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 06:28 PM
0

Lying to get laid is morally acceptable only if you believe that there are times where it is moral to lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 06:18 PM
0

Morals are social constructs. Morals don't really actually exist. Only what exists is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/13 06:00 PM
1

But when one takes that same sort of ethos, and applies it to relationships, self-improvement, dating, and women... Suddenly it's apparently something to be ashamed of, totes abusive, and hating on women. Go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/13 04:29 PM
1

Most people are blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/13 02:58 PM
1

I'm sorry that you think discussing your relationships and the difficulties that arise within those relationships is bragging as opposed to bonding. The Red Pill exists for men to speak on those relationships with their peers for support and advice as they navigate this. There's a ton of things in life to discuss with your peers, and this is one of them. If having sex with a new a girl is a novelty for you, instead of you actually appreciating the other person for returning your affections, I ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/13 02:44 PM
1

That's correct. It's not something you can talk about in polite company, because... Polite company is Blue Pill as fuck. It sucks that you did not have a support network like The Red Pill to keep you from feeling ashamed of your sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/13 02:23 PM
1

Even though I say finding, sometimes the vag finds you. Once you get some Red Pill into you though, you'll figure it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/13 06:16 AM
2

In regards to intimate relations we should all be assholes. Sexual strategy rewards those who exploit. All is fair in love.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/13 08:40 PM
1

Actually your problem is that you assumed my statement meant. It doesent go into male vs female numbers of sexual partners but it sure doesn't sound like 80% of men are incels with the women running wild. More data needed. I can't prove that, because that's not what I said. That's what you said. All I've said is. This can be explained by Alpha theory which posits that only the top 5%-20% of men are desirable to women. For the other 80% of men out there, sex is a rarity let alone female attention…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/13 07:53 PM
1

Sex is sex. If you can enjoy it, who the fuck cares about what anyone else thinks? The only person who needs to be happy about the person you're with is you.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 03:01 AM
1

Obviously the average wouldn't be more. If there are 100 dudes and one dude fucks a 100 girls, and 100 girls fuck that one dude, then it averages out to the same for the population. Do you even understand stats?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/13 09:48 PM
1

You are writing a whole lot of things and advocating that the truth is "middle of the road"-ish. Sorry. Reality works in extremes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/13 08:27 PM
2

When you are dealing with a narcissistic abuser, it is always "your fault". Yes PM.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/13 08:24 PM
2

Women and Men both lie on surveys regarding sex. We are not concerned with what things "SOUND" like. We are concerned with how things are. Women hamster away the majority of sex they have as not counting for reasons such as, "It wasn't on my bed". Or decide that faithful means that you can still sleep with other people without letting your partner know, just as long as you didn't really care about the other person. Or it was in a car. Or a Tuesday. Most sex that women have, they don't consider "…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/13 03:28 PM
1

http://researchtobedone.wordpress.com/my-user-manual/ Reads the same as most other game material to me. How is this different than what PUAs and TRP has already been teaching other than it's typed in non-offensive way. Also: http://researchtobedone.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/why-im-thankful-that-i-care-about-consent/ None of this is to say that I’m perfect about consent. There are times I’ve fucked up as well. Like building good relationships, being consent-minded isn’t a destination you get to, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/13 07:47 AM
0

Manhandling is done in the context of a woman using domestic violence against a man. Men can be victims of domestic abuse. When a man is physically attacked by a woman, and she cannot be stopped without using restraining force in self-defence. It is used to stop domestic violence. Unfortunately due to the misandry in this society, men who dare to speak out against female abusers and call the authorities are likely to find themselves sent to jail due to domestic abuse laws that mandate that offic…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/13 07:13 AM
-1

So the post from TRP has nothing to do with your question? Would this mean you do not consider manhandling as described in that quote to be abusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/13 07:00 AM
29

What's she's doing is actually her way of gaining dominance in the relationship. It's actually a tactic of many narcissists. By giving out a huge (list of faults/things you must accept about her OR ELSE!!!) she's forcing you to accept her reality and her world. Everytime you say "OKAY" to her bullshit rules and codes, she will use it to abuse you. When they say, "I can be a bitch sometimes", it means in the future, she'll feel fine excusing whatever abuse she decides to inflict on you because, h…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/13 06:23 AM
-2

Going your own way is different than being yourself. It requires that one rejects all the standards of society and instead live by one's own standards based on one's own wants and needs as opposed to those of any other. This requires looking at women as they truly are as opposed to listening to the patriarchy and putting them on pedestals, or infantilizing women as feminism does. It also requires looking at relationships from a completely objective perspective, removing "romance", and recognizin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/13 08:05 PM
-5

Why do you need unique?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/13 07:37 PM
-3

How do those two points have anything to do with each other? Not all alphas are the same. Each alpha is a unique key, capable of morphing his key to fit the locks of a woman. Should the alpha's key be a fit, the woman is unlocked. A key is built with self-respect and going your own way. Also lifting, and really just being awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/13 10:49 AM
-4

Even conservative women sway for alpha. Not even being alpha enough can prevent this, as a woman's mind runs like a hamster's. Girls will fuck, and then rationalize that sex has not occurred. A girl's real number is immeasurable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/13 10:23 AM
-3

You don't understand the underside of church activity. A lot of those girls are actually riding the cock carousel. Churches are actually filled with a ton of women looking for alpha cock to ride. In "virginal" religious girls, they will instead opt to take it up the pooper instead of popping their cherry, and suck copious dick. There's actually a sub-community in the PUA community of dudes who focus only on church girls because of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/13 10:31 PM
6

The dude who made that post is actually really messed up. The whole letter is essentially a narcissistic/psychopathic victim funnelling technique. The FAQ is kind of the most ridiculous thing ever. 13) Question: I am super cute and have a great body. Are you good enough for me? Answer: Tell me something about yourself that I or other men cannot $$ PURCHASE $$ for a few dollars off the street and you will have my attention. Being cute or attractive is no doubt appealing but NOT sufficient. Sadly …
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 07:37 AM
7

This kind of hits home that marriage CANNOT exist any longer in this environment. We live in a world of excess. Marriage was made for a world of scarcity. When we live in worlds of excess, the women aren't looking for something safe or stable so they can have enough to eat. It's there and being provided to them because of how plentiful the resources are. In a world such as that marriage is rendered obsolete.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 03:42 PM
1

You know, you're still talking about self-interest. If one is motivated to help others it is because their self is interested in helping out (for whatever reason). Just because those goals benefit others does not take away from the fact that you chose to do something of your own volition. All alturism is done primarily out of one's own selfishness to do something because they get recognition, or emotional satisfaction. All acts are acts of self-interest.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/13 12:49 AM
1

I don't see how monogamy makes anything "more serious".
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 06:02 PM
1

Adjusting how you behave is different than adjusting your personality. Also: if she wants to cheat, she will.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 05:33 PM
1

Can you explain to me how altering your personality is radical honesty?
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 03:44 PM
1

It's not really pessimistic unless the idea that people are motivated by their own self interest is somehow really sad to you. What else would you even want someone to be motivated by other than themselves? Some adherence to an ideal that goes against what they actually desire in life? Loyalty is only way of really saying "this person hasn't fucked me over... YET". That they haven't means it's only because it's beneficial for them not to.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 03:33 PM
0

"If stable and loyal" IF Sorry man, but people are ultimately only loyal to themselves. If she appears loyal, it's only because being with you is in her best interest.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 02:41 PM
1

Clothing doesn't cause rapists to rape.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:36 PM
0

Game isn't some fix all solution. You can have the best game in the world, but if a woman wants an experience she'll have it regardless.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 02:35 PM
1

Can you define value?
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 02:32 PM
-1

Monogamy is outdated anyway. Every time you feel like you can actually be monogamous with a woman, remember: 1) You probably don't actually want to be, as you would definitely enjoy fucking some other woman at some point in time in the future. 2) Most women aren't actually monogamous. 3) All women who are capable of having periods also have cycles in which they desire different types of men throughout the cycle. If a man is a match to wherever a woman is in her cycle, and escalates with game, it…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/13 10:32 PM
0

Not all psychopaths and narcissists behave that way. What you've said about those two groups of people can be applied to all people regardless of mental label. Check your own bias first shitlord before you judge others as being monsters and yourself as being an angel. Because making such a judgement call is actually quite a large indication of your own psychopathy shitlord.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/13 09:26 PM
1

If you cannot understand my viewpoint, may I suggest as you have to me to increase your fucking reading comprehension shitlord?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:08 PM
1

Factors aren't causes. Picture reinforces this viewpoint. If women wore chastity belts it would "help" prevent rape even more.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:44 PM
1

When welfare pays more than working, the problem isn't welfare. The problem is salary. Wages for most people haven't seen a real increase for decades. Until companies are willing to pay a decent wage to their employees, every single person should abstain from work. It's going Galt for the masses.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:57 PM
1

Also of note. This article is talking about couples bringing in single dudes for fun. Not one on one dating. It's definitely awkward being the single guy as you fuck a dude's wife infront of him. Like you're doing something absolutely wrong and slighting a dude as opposed to him being super cool with.the.whole thing.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/13 04:42 PM
1

I have no idea what shit you're going on about here Cause and effect links don't work on percentages you fucking idiot. Yes and the implication here is we are mixing someone heavily predisposed towards raping ... with factors So out of all the "factors" the one you choose to focus on is how a woman is dressed? that lead them to make that choice. Oh right. So the rapist is still making a decision, SO THE CAUSE OF THE RAPE IS THE FUCKING RAPIST. NOT WHAT THE GIRL IS WEARING. True, but it might mak…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:27 PM
1

Both. Those arguments you claim are not solid, are solid. Linking being a woman to being sexually assaulted is incorrect. Men are sexually assaulted as well. Linking being a man to being a rapist is also incorrect. Women rape too. Solid logical arguments. Foam is the direct cause of the two ingredients interacting. It is a direct causation. You take one thing, combine it with another and.have a result. Whether it was apple cidar vinegar, malt-vinegar, or white vinegar do not change the reaction.…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:54 PM
1

She is logically correct. You are not. You do not understand what CAUSE and EFFECT entail. For something to have a cause and effect link, THE CAUSE MUST PRODUCE THE EFFECT. The cause (What someone wears) does not produce the effect (of rape). Do you understand yet why your logic is flawed?
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:51 PM
1

You can always ask. But I'm not going to answer that.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/13 11:13 AM
1

The order of nature is always greater than the order of man. For man is made in nature. There are no labels in the natural world.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/13 11:12 AM
1

It's possible that's how it was. While we know it's impossible to actually prove without going back in time, we also know marriage, at least the "traditional" marriage of today was not the default relationship structure. I feel that when one actually looks at a relationship, and removes the social labelling of what it IS, you are left with exactly what your describing. Two people, who have the an emotional feeling which they interpret as bonds with each other, choosing to be together because the…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/13 11:04 AM
1

The thing is, taking into account everyone in society and the resources, we find we actually have enough for everyone. However I do agree that currently scarcity is what keeps society running, and what has worked in the past. I believe our current societal paradigm is built on scarcity to keep people working. Our society worships work, for the sake of work. Jobs are considered good things, when the majority of work is bureaucratic paper pushing and non-work work. I feel this quote from the Dalai…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/13 01:13 AM
2

Of course something being artificial does not mean that it bad. "Bad" in itself is a moral statement, and artificial itself. Something cannot be "bad" unless it is observed to be "bad". I believe that observing in the past, we can see much of prior human civilization was built on marriage, and religion, and slavery. They served a purpose at one point in time. Slavery was once considered good by society, now it is something society sees as outdated and bad (in thanks to technology). I believe mar…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/13 12:04 AM
2

Your writing and thought processes show connections to disassociative behavior, lack of empthy, and inability to generate or maintain relationships. I'm not a psychiatrist but I wouldn't be surprised at a sociopathic, psychopathic, disassociative personality, or autistic/asperger's issues. That's actually not that far off the mark in some ways. I definitely do have a dissociative personality. This isn't intended to hurt, and comes from a sincere interest in your well being, and to be honest, the…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/13 10:40 PM
0

I agree that these ideas are very philosophical. As is the Red Pill. Also of note: the removal of labels from relationships has a practical usage from a game standpoint. When a girl asks for a relationship "upgrade" or "change". Simply ask her in what way it would change. If it's something subjective, point out how what she's asking for doesn't actually exist.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/13 10:10 PM
4

I like this better. Sexual Objectification is pretty much an oxymoron. For something to have a sex, it must be the opposite of an object which is without sex. Sexualization is actually de-objectification.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:48 PM
2

In what way is the above incorrect and indicative of psychiatric problems, and in what way did I indicate assistance?
/r/TheRedPill14/08/13 09:36 PM
1

Resorting to imagination when we lack data is not delusion so long as you think logically. I view my proposed scenarios as rational. Provided you're being logical. Which you were not, and your logic was flawed. I hope you're not arguing that because I don't happen to have any data memorized that it must not exist? It might, I'm just too lazy to go look shit up for you. No. I'm arguing that you can't prove that "style of dress and sexual assault have a cause-effect link". Your argument is that th…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:31 PM
2

Here's a better way of countering rhetorical "attacks". Actually learning rhetoric. If you're constantly losing to better rhetoric, your conversational ability and your logical abilities are probably shit.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/13 08:01 PM
-1

I'm just trying to imagine how rapists think based on memes I have observed in the population. I think how rapists think of people influences whether or not they are chosen, and I think fashion influences how people think of others. It's a rational conclusion I don't need statistics to believe in. Oh man. I'm just trying to imagine how rapists think It's a rational conclusion I don't need statistics to believe in. Imagination: It's like objective reality, except it's completely in your head. So …
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:56 PM
0

IF: style of dress and sexual assault have a cause-effect link THEN: women whose style of dress is veils would never be raped Makes logical sense. Do you even have studies that link the style of dress with sexual assault? Perhaps the real problem is actually you are still demonizing male sexuality. Men upon seeing naked/barely dressed women do not suddenly go into rape mode. The fact you believe that there is a correlation between style of dress and rape means you believe that innately that (som…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:26 PM
1

Your statement cannot exist without a state in which it was existent. In the acknowledgement of your statement, it has made itself false.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/13 07:05 PM
2

Good and evil don't exist. There is only existence.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 10:12 PM
1

No. It's completely arbitrary. See.. date one guy seriously about every two years Nope. What the fuck is serious about that? Your serious dedication to your bullshit life planning? Keep thinking that life will work out just how your narcissistic hamster mind planned it to be. No. Men are human beings. They are not tools in which you complete your identity with. You could never SERIOUSLY date anyone because you don't even understand what SERIOUS means. (Though from what I guess, SERIOUS for you m…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 08:51 PM
0

I'm a twenty-year-old virgin. I value my virginity and I don't want to have more than five sexual partners total in my entire life, though that might not be possible. Why five? This is an arbitrary number. You're likely someone who believes that life is supposed to follow a script. Additionally, I'm pretty attractive, so I often get propositioned for sex. Take it or leave it. All women do. Thank you for justifying yourself as though you had something to prove. Let's skip ahead. I found out a few…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 08:30 PM
4

I'm a twenty-year-old virgin. I value my virginity and I don't want to have more than five sexual partners total in my entire life, though that might not be possible. Why five? This is an arbitrary number. You're likely someone who believes that life is supposed to follow a script. Additionally, I'm pretty attractive, so I often get propositioned for sex. Take it or leave it. All women do. Thank you for justifying yourself as though you had something to prove. Let's skip ahead. I found out a few…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 08:30 PM
8

Men being natural. Is apparently unnatural. You know girls call it misogyny when it comes to expecting their legs to be shaved. But expecting a man to have his foreskin shaved off. Misandry don't exist. Foreskin is icky and doesn't belong on a REAL man.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 05:20 AM
13

I would choose female as my gender. Way more benefits to being a woman and trans in today's society. I wish they would allow for ethnicity and species options though. Would finally be able to actually debate people without having to worry about offending their feels since I would choose an identity as the most oppressed class.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 12:28 AM
2

Stop acting on your feels. Stop being coward and face your fears. Be afraid, but act in the direction you believe to be correct. If you can't do this, then there is no solution for you ever.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/13 12:23 AM
0

ARRGH. She got bored. You're boring. She didn't care and she liked the attention you provided her. It was nice for her. You expressed some balls when you expressed actual desire. But then you got super worried about it, and then over-thought everything. Honestly. Just don't take shit so seriously. You care too much about being liked, and so you read a million things into every action the girl is doing, and misread a lot of your situation. You're still young, so don't worry too much. In the futur…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/13 07:23 AM
5

This article sounds weird. I feel like there's an important detail missing. What is the age of patrons? I was under the impression that the younger generation didn't even bother with sexual relations for the most part.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/13 07:00 AM
1

Where did I say it was a conspiracy? Also given that most children are born currently to single women, YES, institutionally it really is her choice about a baby's dick being chopped.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:48 PM
2

What about being a new born infant, not having the ability or capacity to consent to mutilation do you not understand? Those are HIS body parts. Not his parents .
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:04 PM
10

Her body, her choice. His body, mother knows best. The choice of a woman always trumps the autonomy of men.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:58 PM
0

This is probably a troll topic. I was raped at knifepoint and spermjacked by an ex though.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 06:26 AM
17

I love that they somehow think tech is welcoming to men. No. It isn't. The men who succeed either love what they do, or push through because they know no other options. What women don't find welcoming is that they're being held to the same standard as men.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 05:38 PM
59

Because of plausible deniability. She just "forgot".
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:32 AM
12

Women attempt to emasculate men to see if their partner is quality. Women always feel insecure about their partner, or where they stand with their partner. Logically they may realize, "oh wow! This dude is great". But emotionally they are always "I dunno about this guy, even after 6 years...." If the man becomes emasculated, she tosses him to the curb, as she has proven that the man is not quality. If the man passes her shit-test she feels secure in knowing she has a prize catch.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 09:07 PM
5

Don't pay for shit. Pay for yourself only. If you're paying for a woman, buy a professional. They're at least honest about it.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/13 07:14 AM
0

It's awesome that you generalize r/mensrights for generalizing. Thank you for showing us that our harshest critics are the same ones that have this problem with being the embodiment of a pot calling a kettle black.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:21 PM
11

The two are not comparable. In one instance a man is seducing a lady. He has broken no word to anyone nor has he lied. A man can seduce a woman with a boyfriend and still be an honest person. In the other a lady is breaking her word to a man. Thus lying, breaking her oath, and betraying her partner. If women want to sleep around, honesty begets trust. Be honest about your desire for more partners. I am honest to women about my intentions to sleep with women other than them. Which is why you'll a…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 02:05 PM
-2

I think you severely underestimate just how much wealth actually exist in the world. Here's a pro-tip: If the U.S. spent the amount of wealth and resources it did on the war on drugs, the war on terror, and the massive amounts of social control and bullshit jobs it uses to perpetuate itself, everyone would be fed and have a roof over their head. There is no wealth redistribution other than the one where the elite scam the rest of the world into working bullshit jobs that actually don't create an…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 12:37 AM
3

Here's the thing though. The "old fashioned" relationships we had in the were not some sort of amazing super happy awesome thing to be in. They existed for SURVIVAL. The reason we had those sexual mores was because we lived in an age of such limited resources that people really had to stick together in such ways, or else they'd die. This is why some of the most patriarchal and traditional societies that exist today, exist in regions where resources are in scarcity. e.g. Eskimo tribes, families l…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 11:32 PM
6

It isn't even selling out. It's recognizing everyone has been fed a shitty way of hooking up and having relationships with each other. The dating paradigm is flawed for both genders and needs to be replaced.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 07:18 PM
-4

Because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:19 PM
1

Even more evidence towards the legal precedence that consent to sex is not actually consent to fatherhood.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:33 PM
24

Just a reminder. Consent to sex is not consent to fatherhood. Cases like this show us that fatherhood is not tied into whether or not you had sex with a woman, but that your genetic material is part of the child's. So next time someone tells you: "Well if you don't want to be a father, don't have sex" Remember that sex has nothing to do with forcing you into fatherhood.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:15 PM
1

See the related post. Costs are not saved by living with a SO unless she is the one paying all the bills.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 01:59 PM
1

Not trolling. Absolutely correct. But dating, or being a boyfriend does not mean exclusivity. Nor does exclusive mean in all situations at all times, unless stated so. ;)
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 11:14 PM
2

Pssh. Just because I agreed to be your boyfriend does not mean I agreed to be monogamous. You just EXPECTED monogamy. Stop trying to manipulate me and control my sexuality. You are being super abusive right now. Also: stop pressuring me and coercing me into commitment. No means no. My body, my choice.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 09:17 PM
8

There is no reason to live with your girlfriend ever. It is always a bad idea. Always. If she needs to co-habitate with you to keep being in a relationship with you, STOP DATING HER AND FIND A GIRL WHO DOES NOT NEED THAT.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 08:03 PM
3

Perhaps the new paradigm for men should be: If you are in a relationship, you can't expect commitment. ;) E.g. You have been dating for six months with someone and you sleep with another woman. If the person you're dating says you don't love her because you slept with someone else, that's shaming and an attempt to play games with your sexuality.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 02:10 PM
4

You're completely right. She is whining. The key here is to look at what she is saying. She is saying that "dating" does not get you anything different than not "dating". That the length of "dating" or that your are "dating" at all allows you any special privilege to tell the other person what to do. What she is saying without realizing it is this. THERE IS NO BENEFIT TO DATING. DATING DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO HOLD YOUR PARTNER RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING. Which means for a Red Piller never date withi…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 01:35 PM
19

It's not quite that. Though completely close. What the author I believe is getting at is how to go about asking/escalating for sex with a woman. Essentially you make a statement along the line of, "I am sexually attracted to you and want to fuck you." As opposed to, "If you love me, you will fuck me." or "It has been 3 dates/six weeks/a year", or "we have been friends forever!!! IT IS TIME!", or "You are a bitch unless you fuck me". If the girl says no, you just stop the seduction and move on an…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 01:45 AM
6

FIND A NEW GIRL THIS IS ALWAYS THE CORRECT ANSWER
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 05:48 PM
0

Hmm, it couldn't be that crime is defined in terms of immoral things men do.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:40 PM
6

Look. Even if you are pro PUA. The truth is dry spells exist. Rejection happens more than sex. Once you transcend the PUA, it matters less.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/13 02:58 AM
1

Underground parties
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 12:51 AM
3

You can't control your emotions. You can only control your behavior. Your investment is an illusion. Only give when it feels good for you to give. That is the only reward you can get.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 12:48 AM
207

Tl;Dr version If a girl is drunk, everyone in the world should take care of her except herself
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:47 PM
1

It's actually reasonable enough. I would take it if given the choice. I just really do not want to be a father. I would not want to raise a kid with a woman who would put me in the position of raising a kid that I did not want. Some stuff there could use refining to find something a little more legal. But hey I suppose i am just one of those 1-3 dudes a year that would do that.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:57 AM
11

You don't keep a girl. She chooses to be around you. You choose to be around one that chooses to be around you, and you actually enjoy spending time with. You enjoy it as long as it lasts.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 03:09 AM
20

Did anyone else notice that most of her debating skills are. "oh my gosh! When men want rights I laugh" As though her own self amusement is enough to justify her own bigotted views
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:47 AM
1

No. The social contract for paternity is not the same social contract that gives us rights. They are different agreements, that deal with different issues.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:57 PM
1

Your definition of ideal wasn't the ideal life for Jesus or Siddhartha. Top-tier is another bullshit term you'll never get anyone to agree with either. Some rockstars who had access to your definition of top-tier would laugh at you for believing any girl is better than drugs. Ask Jim Morrison about that one. There is no BEST or IDEAL. Those are concepts we choose to enslave our perception of the world to. There only IS. That is the RedPill. That is what is to be swallowed.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 10:15 PM
4

Your statements make no logical sense to me. Show me objectively why a man has a responsibility to a child that shares genetics with him. His body, he gets to choose what he does with it. The idea he has any "responsibility" is due to a social contract between the state and himself that he never agreed to. Essentially fatherhood is slavery enforced by society.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 10:08 PM
2

You've clearly never met a hobo before. The only thing that's a requirement for having traveling and having sex with the hottest women in the world. Is that you are breathing, you can go from one location to another, and that there is a woman you believe to be the hottest woman in the world fucking you. (p.s. There is no such thing as "hottest" there are only women you are fucking attracted to and ones you are not attracted to)
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 09:51 PM
5

Definitely not fair. A man's body is his choice. That a woman can claim the assets of a man, the product of his body, just for having a child that shares that man's genes is bullshit. It is essentially slavery, as the woman claims ownership of that man.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 09:12 PM
1

Telling me what I should do does not make it anymore so. Cut the shaming. Having assets is not a requirement for having sex.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 09:08 PM
2

So you cannot provide objective truth. Only an opinion. Which means people can decide for themselves if such a subjective reward is worth the objective risk.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 05:15 PM
22

When feminists do it... They call it "nice guys of OKCupid"
/r/MensRights13/06/13 04:20 PM
4

My body my choice. That means no one has the right to use my time and labour just because someone decides to use me as a sperm bank. I consent to sex. Not to 18 years of raising a kid. I tell any women upfront, "no kids". If she does not agree she can find someone else she wants to sleep with who will agree to fatherhood.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 04:11 PM
2

I don't understand how being outside would change my opinion. Can you provide objective proof on why I am wrong?
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 03:47 PM
-2

Redpillers need to realize that there can never be a relationship between them and the societal obligation that is a daughter. The only answer is: don't have children. If you have children: they aren't yours, they belong to the state. You are only an ATM for them.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 10:53 PM
-1

Trick question. Every man has their own preference on what is better.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 10:28 PM
2

Oh no. Writers at cracked being shit on. Oh wait, that would actually be comedy.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 08:40 PM
5

MRAs are trans inclusive. Stop trying to exclude people bigot. A trans person challenges gender roles, thus they are being attacked for not living up to societally defined manhood. Each boot to the face is a reminder of how society will not accept anything other from someone born male than to man up. Bigot.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:52 PM
12

Men are killed for being homosexual. Men make up the majority of those homosexuals who are killed for being homosexual.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:23 AM
0

Respect? For shit behaviour? Fuck no. If a girl is trying to kill or maim, NO RESPECT GIVEN. If a girl insults, NO RESPECT. A woman earns respect by showing it. The.same.for.men.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 06:56 AM
5

This sounds as though it would be related to the female desire for attention. The narcissistic side of a woman's ego seeks out and craves high-value male attention. The male only space exists to her as competition that steals away the constant validation and sexual affirmation she gets from men. Not only this, because she will only acknowledge a man's existence as a human being if she feels like he is higher in relative status to her, women believe that male only groups are where all the powerfu…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 06:28 AM
7

Men can fall in love. But they cannot fall in love to only one person. A man must have many loves. Loving each aspect of this universe has for us to appreciate. Expecting nothing in return other than the Joy loving gives him. For he chooses to do only those things he loves and enjoys.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 06:13 AM
7

Maybe that really is the problem. They are upset that they will not get to be a societal bestowed honour of being someone's slave, and that they won't sire kids. How important are those for really enjoying life? Freedom, not needing to prove myself to anyone, living for pure appreciation of existence. Those are much more important I feel. We don't owe a thing to society anymore. We are free to do whomever we choose to do provided they want to as well. We can just appreciate a person for what the…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 06:03 AM
2

Communities are concepts. Concepts do not have feelings. There is no average, as average is also a concept. There only is. That is all there is. I am sorry that you find reality to be garbage. Perhaps you should correct your own perspective so as to see things as they actually are instead of what you believe them to be.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:46 AM
19

Communities cannot feel. Only individuals are capable of feelings
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:40 PM
0

You actually don't know what you're even talking about. TheRedPill only deals with objective reality. It does not deal with morals. Morals are social constructs. They are illusions that do not exist in objective reality, thus all morals are objectively false. The only truth is what is. That is the red pill.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:57 PM
0

So much bs in this, there is no place to start
/r/seduction06/06/13 10:31 PM
2

oh shiiiiii so much cognitive dissonance in that hamster.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:40 PM
4

I like how frustrated she is at single fathers and their ability to get sex. Sounds like a bitter woman who feels like she's entitled to male attention and affection. Sorry girl. His body, his choice. If you're upset you're not getting laid woman, try NOT BEING A SHITTY PERSON.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:29 PM
1

Which is why most women do not deserve a relationship with an ape, let alone a man.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:11 PM
3

Not enough redpill for you I see.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/13 02:05 PM
4

I don't know who actually fucked them. Maybe the real alphas who fuck didn't care about being "in". The promoters, the drug dealers, the people creating the music, the people creating the scene. That's who was fucking them. Incidentally, I found the opposite of you regarding youth culture. Youth culture became incredible once I hit 25 and started gaming them after a lengthy career doing day-street game approach. Once I started dealing drugs, promoting parties, playing music, and what not, the gi…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 10:30 PM
6

I like how most the contracts were about controlling the behaviour of men. But with women, "don't get a new cat after the one you has dies" I wonder how the article would be taken if genders were reversed. Honestly: if you need to change or control the behaviour of your partner to be with them, PERHAPS YOU SHOULD NOT BE WITH THAT PERSON.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:04 PM
-16

MGTOW has been around long enough that it really should not need to be defined every time it is used. Sort of like LGBT Edit: WOW. HOW DO... MGTOW is really that unknown to you people. You've much to learn about mens rights
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:16 PM
2

Just further proof That it is women who enforce slut shaming. While men are actually for the most part cool and understanding of sexual permissiveness. I would have liked to see how the study would have applied to different genders. Something tells me the women would hate male slut and female sluts (while hiding their preference of male sluts) While the men would be cool with being friends with sluts, but just would not consider for monogamous relationships.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/13 11:57 PM
1

Dude is so butthurt over the "scum" class. Creates an idealistic version of alpha and the alpha women. Without checking his own fucking narcissism. And proclaims the scum class could not exist under some "real" conditions, THAT HAVE NOT AND NEVER HAVE EXISTED, and they and their women and their offspring would die. WHILE IGNORING THAT HIS SO-CALLED SCUM CLASS HAS THRIVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY. Dude actually needs to take a real redpill because he is.deluded as fuck
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 04:16 PM
1

Genitals can exist without bodies, as I am sure Lorena Bobbit has proved to us.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:27 AM
0

They should change the narrative. People who are charming and actually really awesome will never be alone. Those who require a promise or guarantee that someone will be around to keep those people around will always be alone.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 06:43 PM
22

I can do my own figuring out of who is attractive to me without having some fucking magazine tell me otherwise. I am not going to be turned on by someone telling me they're attractive. Attractive people, much like the rich don't spend their time bragging about their assets to others. The proof is in their relatively gooey pudding. You can tell me how attractive you are over and over, but I am really not going to care UNLESS I'M ACTUALLY ATTRACTED TO YOU.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 10:03 AM
-1

Who cares if she's getting someone else's attention? That's her prerogative, and beyond anyone's control. The only thing you can control is you and where you put your attention to.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 09:48 AM
2

Body Genital Mutilation
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:27 AM
1

Also: IF SOMEONE IS TELLING YOU THAT YOUR VIEWPOINT IS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IT IS. IT IS NOT CALLED BEING A CHILD WHEN YOU CORRECT THEIR DECREPIT SHIT SPEWING LIBEL.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:30 PM
1

You know. One comment on a subreddit is not representative of the attitude of this subreddit. I know you really want to stretch it out to make it look like it is though opinion of this sub. But instead you're defending the view point of the OP, (who has already deleted their comment and agreed domination is the wrong word to use when a group is in the majority) I don't even know what you mean by not handle. I just keep pointing out you're a fucking shitlord for insinuating that a group that deal…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:28 PM
1

They always like to remind me that women commit domestic violence too. Oh yeah! Run for your lives to the nearest shelter, all you abused husbands! http://imgur.com/VlqYgd4
/r/MensRights19/05/13 04:53 PM
1

Wow. Glad that you could finally start talking about the REAL issue. The important issue of dumbshits like the OP above who make statements that dehumanize men. See, when you say that this reddit HAS BECOME a bunch of bitter guys upset that they have become "friendzoned", YOU ARE SPEAKING FOR US. You are taking away OUR VOICE, OUR REAL OPINION, and replacing it with a skewed perspective of what our opinion actually is. You are removing ME from my OWN opinion and attitude and telling me WHAT MY O…
/r/MensRights18/05/13 11:05 PM
0

Normally I would say no, but not anymore. To me, this sub has really become the exact thing I thought it wasn't. A bunch of bitter guys upset that they got "friendzoned." HEY GUYS, I GUESS R/MENSRIGHTS ARE JUST A BUNCH OF BITTER FRIENDZONED DUDERS. Current the top three topics on r/Mensrights are Men account for 53% of rape victims in the US military. (MEN ARE FUCKING VICTIMS OF RAPE, BUT IT'S BECAUSE THEY'RE BITTER VIRGINAL FRIENDZONED LOSERS) 17 year old woman abusing orphanage boys while laug…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:49 PM
1

If you don't believe men should have the same human rights as all human beings, the you have dehumanized men. When you reject men's rights you reject the humanity of men. They become disposable human DOINGS, who can only be treated with respect from what value their services offer. By doing this you remove the respect for a man's humanity. Yes. SHITLORD was used without irony. People will be called out for their shitty bigotry. I wonder why it is YOU are obsessed so much with bigots being called…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:10 PM
0

Preaching superiority of gender. E.g. SCIGIRLS Is like creating STRONGMEN OR POLICEMEN OR FIREMEN. THEY ARE STRONG PEOPLE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND FIREFIGHTERS SCIGIRLS IS A STEP BACKWARDS FOR EQUALITY SHITLORD¡¡¡ Promoting equality PROMOTES EQUALITY. Promoting one gender over the other to make up for what you perceive to be a problem is bullshit. DON'T DISCRIMINATE MEN OVER WOMEN. DON'T DISCRIMINATE WOMEN OVER MEN. PROMOTE EQUAL TREATMENT OF BOTH GENDERS. Is equality really that hard for yo…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:03 PM
0

Also i like that you believe that STEM fields should somehow be a 50/50 gender divide split. WITHOUT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THAT PEOPLE HAVE PERSONAL INTERESTS THAT AREN'T EQUALIZATION OF GENDER IN A FIELD THEY HAVE NO INTEREST IN. Fuckfaces like you are just as oppressive to women. Demanding that WOMEN WITH NO INTEREST IN SCIENCE LEARN SOMETHING THEY HAVE NO INTEREST IN. BECAUSE GENDER QUOTA = EQUALITY. Because you know, women exist as a group as opposed to being individuals with their own wants a…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 07:09 PM
0

I am sorry that you think that the radical notion that men are HUMAN BEINGS DESERVING OF RIGHTS is insanity. I hope you can overcome whatever problems that have occurred in your life that you think it is okay to dehumanize men.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 07:04 PM
0

TL;DR I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE DIRECTION OF THIS SUB BECAUSE I AM SCARED OF EQUALITY. ALSO: I DON'T MEAN DOMINATED. BUT REALLY I DO. Sorry RadFem. Your language.structure gives you away. Only a feminist would think men teaching students science is DOMINATION.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 07:01 PM
-1

You were never rethinking your stance. You are a narcissistic shitlord. Maybe you'd find this place worth being in if you'd actually take your head out of your ass long enough to see, MEN ARE OPPRESSED. See yuh laterz when you realize Misandry is real.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 06:37 PM
-1

Thank you for affirming that you're ignorant. Do you actually have a post about Men's Rights that isn't just you concern trolling? Science is DOMINATED by men? I have a feeling those PROFESSORS TEACHING EVERYONE are doing no such domination. Holy shit! Too many men are teaching people E=mc<sup>2.</sup> THEY ARE DOMINATING WOMEN BY EDUCATING PEOPLE ON SCIENTIFIC FACT! THOSE OPPRESSIVE MEN AND THEIR FACTS AND SCIENCE! Man. Don't even get me started on how men are oppressing women by DOMINATING sui…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 06:25 PM
6

Comment 1 is telling an MRA they're discrediting MRAs by presenting alternate possibilities. Comment 2 is you not able to realize why scigirls is discrimination while Bill Nye is not. If your evidence to NOT being a concern troll is BY SHOWING HOW YOU BRING UP YOUR CONCERNS TO MRAS TO TELL THEM THEY ARE WRONG, chances are you need to reexamine what evidence is.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:57 PM
3

Your proof only confirms a history of concern trolling. Thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:43 PM
8

Feminist concern troll likes concern trolling
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:21 PM
0

You do understand the difference between Being treated as equals. Compared equal outcomes. This is an example of women being treated as weaker than men. Thus THE PATRIARCHY thinks women are weak and believes they need a step up to compete. This is offensive because it promotes strict gender roles. It says women are weaker. That men are always stronger. Everything about this is why male victims of rape cannot be taken seriously. By giving women a step up, it's saying that men cannot be victims. T…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:57 PM
8

TIL A man having higher relative status than a woman means that should the woman engage in sexual intercourse with the man, it was due to his sexual coercion. Women sleeping with high status men is rape culture.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:00 PM
5

If she can have a threesome with alpha and deny it to you, YOU ARE HER BETA BUX AND HE IS THE ALPHA FUX She respects you only as much as you can provide her stable betahood. For the past 3 years she would have rather had her alpha but she settled for you. Keep up the support (of the girl who has just let you know, no you are not her first choice. You'll just do.) The fact she kept this from you should make you wonder what else she is keeping secret.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/13 10:13 PM
-1

Not in all cultures. Respect the differences of all human beings.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 11:04 PM
0

No. You want to know something. I fucking admit I lose the argument and you rub it in? Fuck you sir. Low class fuck. No. Free will exists you piece of shit. OH HEY LET'S USE ACCOUNTABLE INSTEAD OF RESPONSIBLE. No. Really, though. Why would we arrest rapists if everything is a hologram? Why would we have arrests at all if everything was pre-determined? Guess what. The answer to that question is the same fuck face. IT HAPPENS BECAUSE IT CAN. Shit rhetorical question from a shitlord rape apologist.…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:23 PM
1

You win this round determinism. It's good to know everything has already been decided. Every rape of a woman pre-determined and thus no individual is responsible. Only an initial domino. Please tell every rape victim ever now. "hey, that rape. Nothing could be done. Everything happens because of previous causes so your rape was meant to happen ever since the universe's creation. We won't hold the rapist.responsible because no one can be held responsible for something predetermined." You cannot s…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 10:12 PM
1

Laws of the universe are a products of the universe choosing to exist. Thus consciousness exists outside the universe where time/space does not apply to them. All decisions and choices were made outside this, are the initial "cause". The reality we see before us is an illusionary "hologram" in which time and space exist as simulation that is percieved by our senses.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:19 PM
1

And yet, without an initial effect there would be no cause to follow and thus no existence. Yet you admit we exist here in material form. Rocks are not part of an individual consciousness but rather the collective of the universe. The human body is still at the higher will power of the universe thus cells contrary to a human's will can exist due to the universe's higher order of free will. We can make our brain fly. Step into an aeroplane. Your brain is flying on lift-off. We can change how chem…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 06:22 PM
1

In addition. If we hold that we a part of the universe, and that the universe being under cause and effect has an initial effect in which the cause is free will, we can see our existence is directly related to that free choice. Thus we can see we have the free will to exist, and the illusion is the separation of the individual from the universal.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:41 PM
1

Let us assume that we exist as matter that exists within the universe as part of it. Let us also assume that the initial choice of the universe was to exist. We are by-products of that choice. The effect of the universal cause. Thus our existence is due to the free will of the universe. Inside this system we are restricted in our free will only by the free will of the universe. In the same way that cells belong to the body, they can exert free will, but not contrary to the free will of the unive…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:37 PM
1

Or just you. You are the cause. That chose the effect. You chose this existence and are ultimately responsible for it.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:00 PM
1

Here's the thing. There is already one observation that effect can happen without cause. The "big bang" happens independently. Time is an expression of relative separateness of that initial bang. From the perspective of you or I, it seems that time passes. But outside the closed system it does not exist. Thus free will exists outside the of the laws of the universe and took place at a point in which time was non-existant. The universe could not exist currently unless independent action was taken…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 01:35 PM
1

Lol. Silly. There can never be an "initial" cause using cause and effect. This means cause and effect are inherently incorrect in describing our current situation as having come from the past. At a certain point there is no past. You posit that it is a big bang. But yet give no cause to it. Thus we have this existence we call this present moment in which we can discern no real cause for. Bananas may rot. But that does not explain why this existence even is.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 10:48 PM
1

Um wow. does everything happen for absolutely no reason? Does everything happen for a reason? If so, can you tell us the reason for existence? The reason for that reason, the reason for that reason. But the thing is that the past is simply a concept. Time itself changes in REFERENCE to that around it. So from the reference point of you, it totes looks like there's this time thing going on you are observing these. "ticking clocks" and "passage of time". But ultimately it does not change the fact …
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:20 PM
1

No. The past is an illusion. It is non-existant, as it does not exist currently. If you agree that matter can exist only in the present. And existence requires matter. Then the past does not exist, as it no longer has matter. The passage of time itself is an illusion.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:44 PM
1

The problem with this is the past doesn't even exist. Not anymore. All you can do is recall it. You cannot re-experience. Thus past is a subjective experience.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 03:25 AM
1

That is an entirely transphobic argument. Just because the body is male does not mean the mind is not female. Sorry bigot. The universe's laws do end where the mind begins. Bigot.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:06 AM
2

Those who deny their own choice still have made one.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 03:43 PM
16

"It seems as though you're unaware of this incredible thing called free will. You should Google it sometime"
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:17 PM
2

And they will continue writing these articles as long as feminists do not speak out against it. If feminists do not want to be associated with this misandrist sentiment, they need to speak out against it, and those who claim to speak for them. /r/mensrights has already done more to moderate it's message than any feminist subs have attempted. Feminists need to learn from MRAs on this.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:43 PM
6

Unfortunately, our culture tells gay men that to be valued, they have to be like women. I think that's an evil part of our society. Actually our culture says the exact same thing to straight men. One look at how boys are treated for "Masculine" behaviors like "fidgeting" sort of shows this. The school system teaches men that if they want to succeed, they must become women.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/13 10:26 PM
1

Radscum article from Vice promoting transphobia. Such brave feminists vice are.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 07:32 PM
1

Am I the only one reading the languaging on this? Another "men suffer because they take on a feminine role", "flexibility is feminine". languaging that leads to of course the conclusion, all men suffer because the patriarchy which men have created thus all male suffering and male gender roles are created by men. And of course all positive attributes are all "feminine". Women play no part in this ever. Because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 10:13 PM
8

"male-born" FUCK THIS COMPLETELY. If I am born with a dick, this does not make me a "MAN". Rad-fems hatred towards trans* people makes me sick. Apparently by deep, rich, interesting, and fun, they mean telling women who are FUCKING WOMEN FUCK YOU RADFEMS, that they aren't women. The bigotry of feminism is sickening.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 03:17 AM
0

Sanity. Because as a society, we believe that when women kill their own children it's a normal and sane thing.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 12:10 AM
18

Well. I guess in your world it must be okay to commit a violent crime. Because they "were asking for it". I wonder what other crimes you approve of when a victim is "asking for it".
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:56 PM
7

That's funny. So what led you to decide one was journalism and one was a sneering blogger? The official Gawker stamp of approval? Or maybe you're saying Gawker is just a bunch of sneering bloggers pretending to be journalists. (Which in all honesty, it actually is) While AVFM is journalism. From my view point, your argument about TONE is bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 12:47 PM
3

escape now this woman is not an idiot she is using and abusing you she will fuck you over and send you to jail run please run
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:16 PM
1

The "boyfriend shirt" is a shirt for women. However in a modern relationship setting, "boyfriend" is no different than emotionally manipulated slave. The "boyfriend shirt" symbolizes a woman's entitlement to rule over her man as though he were property. Not only this it symbolizes a woman's claim over her man's property, as even the clothing off his back becomes her possession. You do not see a man's item called a girlfriend shirt, precisely because of this double standard against men. "Girlfrie…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 12:02 AM
1

Well you might touch their boobs later Well I might pay for a meal LATER. Like when they've become someone meaningful enough in my life to warrant me treating them to dinner. Someone I'm still finding out if I like or not DOES NOT GET THAT TREATMENT. pretty weird with another guy Hence you feel that a date deserves to be treated better than a friend, because they have tits? Tits that you MIGHT touch? How is this any different than looking at a girl as a stripper? When a partner becomes more mean…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 02:24 PM
1

Something I don't get. If "girlfriend mode" is offensive. Does that mean "boyfriend shirts" are also offensive?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:57 PM
6

Because a date doesn't fucking imply anyone paying for anything. The idea that whomever invites the other out is bullshit. When my friends invite me out, I don't expect them to pay for me. They expect me to pay my own way. My friends and my potential dates have something in common as well. WE HAVEN'T FUCKED YET! The simple fact is this. If I wouldn't do it with my male friends, I won't do it with you. Your vagina does not entitle you to special treatment.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:05 AM
-3

Shemale, Drag Queen, Pedophile Looks like some anti-male discrimination terms here. Tying the whole idea of men having sexual "deviancy" (anything outside the norm, cis, hetro missionary position is pretty much deviancy these sort) to pedophilia as per usual. It's sad to see how this misandrist society can only judge men on terms of what their use is to women, as opposed to valuing men as they already are.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:41 AM
1

Pro-censorship! Yay! Let's make it a crime to say anything offensive to women in public. Fuck free speech.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 02:09 AM
5

Mainstream Feminist Stance: As women are an oppressed class, any action they take towards their oppressor class cannot be considered violent or coercive. To even suggest that a member of a oppressed class can rape that of the oppressor class is just male privilege.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:19 PM
4

Mainstream Feminist Stance: As women are an oppressed class, any action they take towards their oppressor class cannot be considered violent or coercive. To even suggest that a member of a oppressed class can rape that of the oppressor class is just male privilege.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:31 PM
-8

The real truth of it is... Peepz got no clue how much sex is really goin' on. Cause there is so much sex goin' on. So so much. And ain't no society ever gonna know just how much. When you go your own way, and fuck the rules of society, cough syrup and crazy times are a plenty.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 08:33 AM
5

When coming out as a MRA, it's easier just to say one is a egalitarian than actually just refer to MRA at all ever.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:16 PM
1

I live a life of cough syrup and random hook-ups. I have a pretty crazy love life. But I can't really recommend that to you. But fuck marriage. Marriage is not love. It's just a artifact. Love is nothing about having a nuclear family. Love is about expressing your appreciation for another human being and asking nothing in return. Should they also appreciate your existence, they will return the love by appreciating you for who you are. screw labelling anything ever. just let things be as they are…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 01:48 AM
5

It already more or less exists. But fuck if the government will let us have access to it. A man is slave to his children.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:31 PM
2

You're looking for the wonderful Feminisnt. As a pretty hardcore MRA, I kind of really need to see these things to restore my faith in "womankind". It's too easy to let my fears turn towards hatred.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 12:26 AM
3

Oh. She's definitely a bigot. I would not be surprised if she did hold such viewpoints. If one can be bigot towards one group, the seeds of bigot thought processing have already been planted.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 12:21 AM
18

This is silly. If we want to change the conversation, they need to know we exist. The more traffic they get, the more they'll write articles like this, and the more likely our issues will gain exposure.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:23 PM
2

Man. I'm not surprised Jezebel would essentially play a "oh, dude isn't a victim of rape" game. Since mainstream feminists tend to hold the idea that as men are of an oppressor class and as such they cannot be raped by a member of an oppressed class. But I'm really happy to see that commentors actually get it. Male rape IS a thing.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:44 PM
78

Well guys, I've said it before, and I'll say it again. As women are an oppressed class, any action they take towards their oppressor class cannot be considered violent or coercive. To even suggest that a member of a oppressed class can rape that of the oppressor class is just male privilege. This is the feminist mindset. This is why women can't be considered rapists, but only "sex-mad". As the victim of child abuse, I've had to live with this double standard for too long. The idea that I can't b…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:01 PM
8

Well guys, as women are an oppressed class, any action they take towards their oppressor class cannot be considered violent or coercive. To even suggest that a member of a oppressed class can rape that of the oppressor class is just male privilege. One day, hopefully reality catches up this feminist realization.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:59 PM
8

That should be a damn good clue that you should GTFO of the relationship. Just don't date people like this, you have the power. And I know it is hard, I have been through it, although nothing nearly as bad as your situation ever happened to me. At the time I truly did not have the power. I did not know better. I've got my share of mental problems, and since then drug problems. This was the same sort of "love" I had to deal with growing up. Thank goodness for male privilege or else someone might …
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:53 PM
6

Honestly? Mebbe because as a child I went through such abuse I didn't know what healthy looked like. All I knew was that I was in love. Yeah, mebbe I should have known better, but the truth is I did not. But thanks to feminism I know, I only have myself to blame for being so weak to be manipulated. What I really needed to do was man up clearly. Men are monsters who can only abuse. p.s. guess what my ex told me every day? that essentially I'm a horrible monster who was manipulating her because I …
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:17 PM
1

The funny thing is... There's been petitions for this for years now, and I've signed a hell of a lot of them. I would give anything to be able to turn back time so I wouldn't have had to suffer what I have, and what many other men have suffered through. Of course the fact that feminists have suppressed access to male birth control, and it's actually been around for a REALLY LONG TIME, WILL NEVER ACTUALLY BE RECOGNIZED. Oooh look, male birth control! It's soooo new (only OVER 10 YEARS OLD ALREADY…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:53 PM
29

As a dude who has been the victim of spermjacking, let me tell you this. It does happen. And sometimes it happens with a knife to your throat, and a promise that if you don't give into her demands, she'll slit your throat in your sleep. BUT HEY, SPERMJACKING CLEARLY ISN'T A THING GUYS.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:03 PM
8

Clearly WE'RE the paranoid ones for thinking spermjacking is even a thing. Let alone legally endorsed spermjacking.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:01 PM
-4

When something looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flies like a duck and even tastes like a duck... There will be someone like you there to remind me not to connect the dots and assume it's a duck.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:57 PM
-1

Marginalization of men. Looking at men as monsters instead of human beings. Seeing all men as rapists. All here. All promoted by mainstream feminists.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:27 PM
1

Yeah. If you care about little boys being raped, it means by feminist standards, you're anti-woman. You say they don't care. I disagree. If men were institutionally valued as being human beings as opposed to feminist sex objects, people would care. It is because we have institutionalized misandry and male disposability that they don't "care". That not caring is how, feminism continues to support matricentric patriarchy, and this is one of the ways they do so. The marginalization of men is how th…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:25 PM
1

This woman is displaying a world view that is deemed acceptable by society at large. Her viewpoint is a viewpoint that many women share. Unless you're trying to say that you just have a problem with this woman, and that her intentions and viewpoint are totally acceptable.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:17 PM
1

thank you good sir. above has been edited.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:02 PM
1

Clearly the act of women viewing men as success objects ISN'T Men's Rights. How dare masculinity and sexuality only be acceptable when it's a doctor!?!? But since he's a doctor, his marriage doesn't matter. He's just a cock to be ridden because his M.D. entitles your vagina to his cock. Pro-Tip Feminists: If you view men as success objects to be seduced for your pleasure, you're a bigot. Men do not owe your rapist fantasies anything.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:50 PM
4

Yo. But women go to jail too. So clearly this isn't a men's rights issue. The fact that a man in today's society has a 1/8 risk of being sent to jail REALLY just means that men need to shut up and man up because we're clearly not doing our job. P.S. If 1/8 men are at risk for being sent to prison, how many men does that mean are going to be institutionally raped? Trick question! None, because as feminists let us know, men can't be raped. Especially not institutionally, misandry doesn't exist yo.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:38 PM
2

Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children. Hillary Rodham Clinton I'm unsure what you mean by acceptable 'matri-centric' world view. The matricentric world view I'm combating is th…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:46 PM
5

I prefer matricentric patriarchy. Most feminist definitions of patriarchy fail to see how matricentricity promotes patriarchy, and how feminist matricentricity has actually been used to prop up the patriarchy. Most feminist definitions also fail in labeling all men in a society as patriarchs without realizing the apex-fallacy this plays into. In otherwords, the current oppression suffered under today is made by the apex men of society who are absolutely obsessed with promoting matricentricity to…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:26 PM
4

The feminist sees a patriarchy holding the bar that they just ran into. A MRA sees a society that has hated them forever holding the bar. And egalitarian sees a bar being held by someone that they have just run into. The feminist is taken care by society because of the abuse they have suffered from the bar. The MRA is told to man up, his bar run in was not a gender issue, and told to go die. The egalitarian... I dunno what to put here actually.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:16 PM
7

I'd enjoy seeing a feminism that actually does something to address the patriarchal oppression that men suffer under. Seeing women actually concerned with equality as opposed to extracting what little wealth and life remains of a homeless and drug-addicted maleness that exists in today's society would be a welcome change. But until then, I'll continue seeing feminism as an integral part of the patriarchy that seeks to force gender roles on men, and do everything in it's power to silence and marg…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:10 PM
-1

I'm surprised we didn't get another, "THIS ISN'T MEN'S RIGHTS!!!!" post about this. Understand, this is why every time you minimize the suffering of men you are essentially promoting the patriarchal standard that men are disposable, and it's okay to rape little boys. I will never relent against those who seek to exploit the world's most abused and neglected victims. To every person who seeks to promote aid their pedophile-fueled patriarchal feminist narrative, as the victim of child abuse myself…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:42 PM
2

I'm sorry you're a concern troll and a child rape supporter. I'll give you a gold star for effort champ.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:44 PM
1

Man, that was pretty pro-child rapist I'd say. It's like you're saying children being raped is like women being ungrateful. Let me tell you, the rape of children is much more serious than should be thrown around by child rape apologists like yourself. As long as we have pro-child rape supporters like yourself in the MRA, we'll never have any legitimacy. May I suggest you stop being such a pedophile and start standing up for men and boys of this society which are forced to undergo the sort of B.S…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:07 PM
2

It certainly is when it's being used as patriarchal oppression. This show just how subtle mainstream feminists are in showing the disposibility of men by devaluing the merit of their actions. p.s. stop cutting the penis off of male suffering by playing the "this isn't a mens issue" card. I'm sorry you support ignoring the suffering of males, I guess it's okay when little boys get raped because it's not a mens right issue. It's okay because it's not like their rape didn't happen.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 07:28 PM
9

Dude. Stop. Realize you're living a very dangerous lifestyle and that any time one of these girls feels that you've taken advantage of her, you're going to jail. The likelihood of her playing this game with you goes up if she has a boyfriend. The best thing you can do is change your lifestyle so that you've screened these women thoroughly. Keep texts, be blatantly obvious with what you want, and save every single shred of information that you can. The likelihood of her being able to convict you …
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:47 PM
3

In all actuality, feminism has been influenced by and created under the Pussian style academic system (the system of education of which we currently use in North America) which promotes male disposibility for the purposes of making men into better workers/soldiers and convinces them to put things like "country", "honor", and the causes of others before their own life. Imagine, men living their lives for their own sake as opposed to the sake of whatever society believes they should live for. THE …
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:07 PM
1

How is hating another person self hating? That's certainly a whole lot of self one would have to have to feel that one can claim that all members of a group make up a self. The parts of the patriarchy that these poor HR women are supporting at the ones that feminism supports, which incidentally means that feminism is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:38 PM
2

Don't you really mean that feminism supports the patriarchy by ignoring male disposability and falling prey to the apex fallacy?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:26 PM
9

But remember, when women discriminate it's okay because it's totally fighting the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:23 PM
6

If he didn't want to support a child he should have not gotten raped! I mean, it takes two to rape, and clearly this boy should've known better! (plus I think the definition of rape now only applies to penetration, so since she didn't pegg him, he can't claim his experience is rape. Rather the legal system gets to tell him what his experience is in disregard for his feelings) AH, ISN'T MALE PRIVILEGE SO GREAT GUYS!?! YOU GET RAPED, AND YOU STILL GOTTA PAY!
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:44 PM
5

But clearly, an institution that's 90% female couldn't be the source of INSTITUTIONALIZED HATRED OF MEN. That would mean misandry exists. Which it clearly doesn't, everyone loves men so much and they have so many privileges. We never look at them as disposable beings that should die for our benefit ever. I mean, being a man is so good, no man would ever give up his manhood to be a woman... wait....
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:40 PM
1

I like how we've got our prisons full of men to the point that they're larger than the gulags, and that it ISN'T a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter