~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The hypocrisy of "derailings""It's rarity is irrelevant because the severity of penis loss is beyond anything else". That's your personal opinion, and I don't agree. But let me be clear, again: I agree that male circumcision should be banned worldwide. Nevertheless, please consider this: The goal of male circumcision is removing the foreskin. Losing your penis is an accident, and it's relatively rare. Although this is an assumption, I don't think you know anyone personally who has lost their penis, although you probably kno… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/01/25 10:17 AM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of "derailings"If you read what I wrote again, you will see that I wrote that it is very rare that anyone loses their entire penis, just like it's very rare that the vagina is sewn shut. In your last comment you're comparing an extreme case accident on one side to a successful routine procedure on the other side. Not a fair comparison - especially not to claim victory. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/01/25 08:56 PM |
| 13 | California lawIn reading the article, the DA's attitude doesn't seem to be the issue - rather it's the two laws that's the issue. The DA seems to want to prosecute the offender, but because saying "I'm a woman" is enough according to the law the person can't be tried, as another law says that only men are able to rape. So, the problem is the two laws, not the DA, it seems to me. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/01/25 12:25 PM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of "derailings"I know I'm not a moderator or anything, but I still felt the need to butt in here, as IMO the discussion between you two got a bit out of hand. It looked to me like the two of you mostly spoke about what is possible rather than what is likely or common. More men than women are circumcised, so there will also be more cases of botched circumcision, so men "win" in those ways when we talk about who's the real victim, but hopefully it's obvious that the effects of having your foreskin removed are le… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/01/25 12:20 PM |
| 4 | An insightful comment on the man v bear debateI'm responding a bit late, and while I agree with your point, I do think it's important that we remember that the "by other men" argument does actually apply in some cases, especially when it comes to violence. More men than women are victims of violence, but the perpetrators tend to still be men, and often men are victims of violence by competing for status ("I'm not backing down"), by engaging in gang wars, or by being victims of criminals, which tend to also be men. Although I'm sick and tire… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/12/24 03:59 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter