TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mckeitherson Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by mckeitherson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

I agree, sad to see the responses in this post. Finally the one to make me unsub from here, too toxic.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:24 PM
-2

ITT: People who have no idea what they're talking about. This is sludge propped up as an issue.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:24 AM
9

Used to work at Krogers myself. Any time management wants to reprimand you or write you up ask for a union rep to be present. Some managers are nice but others will write you up because of an agenda (like what happened here). At our store, some customer badmouthed a cashier (one of the nicest persons at the store) and a manger proceeded to bitch her out and tried to write her up. After the cashier asked for a union rep which showed up, the manager changed her tone quickly. KNOW YOUR RIGHTS AND A…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:25 PM
2

I don't think this situation is as clear-cut as you make it. If the advance was coming from a peer who was on the same level as the agent was then you're right and it probably shouldn't be a big deal. But this woman was a lot higher up in the chain of command compared to him. In this situation, it probably felt like saying no was going to have a negative repercussion on his career. If my boss had hit on me and made advances it would make me feel extremely more uncomfortable than a fellow employe…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:57 PM
3

More of a pun thread than a discussion really. Regardless, he's just looking for ideas to help deal with what just happened. I feel your title makes it seem like you want people to go over there and spout some doctrine about circumcision, which isn't really necessary if that's the case.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:39 PM
1

When you consider the fact that the United States has the dubious distinction of having both the highest circumcision rate and the highest per capita STD/HIV rates in the first world, I wouldn't consider circumcision a defense worth considering You're assuming correlation means causation just because of per capita statistics. If you had statistics of HIV rates in DC among circumcised men vs. uncircumcised men then it might mean something. In regards to your STD test question I'll repeat what I'v…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 08:51 PM
0

Everyone knows that condoms offer more protection against STDs than just plain old circumcision. However we all also know people do stupid things like have sex without condoms when they're young and feeling invincible as well as in the heat of passion. Why not give them the protection circumcision offers against that? Like I said circumcision performs as a second line of defense, a condom is the first one. As far as MRSA, that can be caught in a number of different ways, even just going to a hos…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 06:44 PM
1

So because I don't have a son I'm not allowed to make a comment about circumcision? My sister's doctors throughly explained the risks before they had the procedure done. Just because it wasn't done in your case doesn't make that the norm across America. To some parents and doctors this is a necessary procedure and if the state or medical community doesn't prevent them from doing it then it is within their parental rights. Like I said elsewhere, put it up for vote on a ballot or in a state legisl…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 06:19 PM
0

Very interesting article. Wish he would have cited his sources for the studies so I could look at them.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:59 PM
28

It saddens me to see some of the advice these people give to this guy. If the situation was reversed and it was a guy staring and making personal comments about a women they'd tell her to come down hard on him and report him, not to grow up and ignore it. Your superiors are there to help you and foster a productive working environment, if she's creating a hostile one and won't stop after he asks her to then by all means go to your next higher-up or HR.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:28 PM
-1

Female circumcision is an optional procedure to remove part of the clitoral hood to expose part or all of the clitoris. Female genital mutilation is removing all or part of the clitoris to remove the chance for sexual pleasure. They're two different procedures. What's right and wrong is all relative, what society accepts as the norm depends from region to region. Circumcision was culturally and socially acceptable at a time but now other people are raising their voice saying we shouldn't circumc…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:05 PM
0

Right now it just boils down to the government and the medical community saying the parents have the final say in it since the medical community is on the fence about it. If some communities or individual states want to ban the practice then that's fine with me if it's done in a democratic manner such as this. Society judged it as ok in the past and if in today's culture we think differently then we should vote that way. Some individuals might get all bent outta shape about losing their "parenta…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 04:58 PM
4

Parents are allowed to weigh their ideas, but that's wrong. Like any other surgical procedure, they should be forced to use a risk/benefit analysis. They do look at all the risks, a doctor isn't going to perform a procedure without explaining the risks to you. In their mind it does outweigh the potential risks. And when it's not done right, they have most likely rendered their son a permanent virgin. What benefit is worth that? Any procedure has risks, and in their minds the procedure outweighs …
/r/MensRights02/03/10 04:46 PM
0

I don't equate female circumcision with mutilation if it's within this context: Though much less common, other women opt to have the hood surgically trimmed or removed so as to permanently expose part or all of the clitoral head. Such a procedure is akin to male circumcision and is sometimes known as female circumcision. Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood#Modifications Now removing the clitoris or altering it to remove all sense of sexual pleasure is a form of mutilation and should…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 04:38 PM
-2

There's no need to "lop off" the breasts - you simply have to remove the mammary tissue, leaving the skin and pectoral muscles intact. From his comment he made it sound like we should cut off the entire breast, not remove a small section, which led to my comment. Circumcision only offers such benefits if you're having unprotected sex. Slap on a rubber, which you should be doing anyways, and it no longer makes a difference. I see alot of people having unprotected sex even though they know the ris…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 04:31 PM
1

Considering that circumcision is an optional procedure parents are allowed to weigh all the ideas they want when it comes to having it done or not. When the procedure is done right those risks you mention are at a minimum. People act like we're going around using dull stones to cut away the skin.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 04:18 PM
0

And we wouldn't expect it to become common because we have treatments available to take care of breast cancer. Circumcision didn't start out as a way to prevent HIV, but some studies have shown it may provide an inherent benefit to help prevent the spread of it. Is the study all-inclusive or 100% right? No, we can never tell since there are so many variables that come into play, so more research is needed. Did I say that it was better than condoms than preventing it? No, you should use every def…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 04:09 PM
-1

It's a very slippery slope going from cutting off a portion of the tissue from a penis, while still keeping it functional, to lobbing off a breast in its entirety. Granted, there may be other ways of treating or preventing conditions like HIV, but some parents and doctors feel this is another line of defense. I don't agree with forced circumcision against the parent's will or making it 100% mandatory with all newborns. If you don't want to circumcise your child then that's fine. But you can't ta…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:50 PM
-4

Some parents as well as people in the medical community seem to think it has benefits. Since the parents are the caretakers of the child they have a say in what they think is right for their child, so if they want to circumcise them then they can go ahead.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter