TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mcmuggins Archive

View 1 posts and 69 comments by mcmuggins on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
297

mcmuggins/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It is illegal in seven states in the United States to hold public office if you identify as an atheist, or do not believe in god.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:34 PM
3

Spitting on someone is assault, and you can be arrested for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 08:07 PM
3

You are quite the pretentious fuck for being completely wrong on this issue.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:01 PM
2

Another garbage article written by someone who has not a clue as to what the fuck they are even saying. Just about every point she makes screams of: "Hey, see! The MRA's are bad! They don't agree!" And...that's it. There is very little substance, if any, in the article. "Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Why doesn't everyone see how bad men are?" Utter and complete horseshit. The more this stuff is written and published, the more the true colors of feminism show. They are running out of outs, and they're get…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:27 PM
1

That is one shitty article.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 12:51 PM
1

Only commenting on what I typically see here. Not really concerned about what your opinion is on the matter.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:18 AM
0

Wouldn't worry about it, it's likely an SRS'er stirring up controversy. Happens by the minute in this sub.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:22 PM
3

They didn't publish this comic, because this comic is dog shit. Writer/Illustrator should seriously reconsider their profession of choice. I wasn't offended by the content of this in any way, simply offended that the writer/illustrator looked at this and deemed it worthy for publishing. It's things like this that help our cause. All this does is make them look entirely like dipshits.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:02 PM
20

but I know a fuck load about enduring sexism. Feel free to ask me something about that. So do many men, feel free to ask them about it.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:46 PM
-1

Can relate. Happened to me years ago. Five years after a sexual encounter I randomly saw this girl at a bar. She proceeded to, drunkenly, accuse me of raping her in a sexual encounter that took place five years prior to her accusing me. Luckily, nothing ever came of it, but that was moment in my life where I realized how powerful women truly are.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:42 PM
24

Wouldn't worry about it to much. SRS is pretty much the Westboro Baptist Church of Reddit. Mostly just lemmings reiterating the same garbage over and over. It's a shame because I expected to have some semblance of good discussion with them, but for the most part none are really intelligent enough to hold their own in conversation. Although them trolling themselves with this post is pretty entertaining.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 04:47 PM
2

Haha /u/Isa010 really REALLY tried hard to strawman that one. Good call on aborting.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:15 AM
1

WHOOSH
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:05 AM
6

What? He responded to you and proved you wrong in about 3 seconds. Not sure what you're talking about. Enjoy being delusional, as you clearly are.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:06 PM
3

Next time you may want to do your research first.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:18 PM
2

Wouldn't worry about it. Let them wallow in their own filth, that's pretty much what SRS has become. It's just a large group of extremely unintelligent people advocating for things that most of them don't understand. Wouldn't get too worked up over it.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:07 PM
2

You're still missing the point. The point is that out of all of those things you mentioned, height is not something you can control. Everything else is within your power to change.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:02 PM
12

Yeah, it really isn't worth devoting any time over there at all. Within seconds you can locate just about every logical fallacy in existence, on the front page/top comments alone.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:59 PM
2

The real damage here is that many people will read this article and actually take it to heart. It's quite terrifying.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:00 PM
-2

You do realize that recording her without her knowledge makes the evidence dismissable correct? If you record her without her consent to being recorded, depending on the state in which you live, then the evidence becomes inadmissable in the court of law, to my best understanding of the way privacy works with regards to the law. Also, IANAL.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:55 PM
1

It's fine, this is standard fare for them. They'll have a circlejerk of epic proportions over this. The best part, based on their responses I read, is how much they are projecting. It's almost unbelievable. Their are countless replies talking about how he is putting all of the blame on feminism, when yet, the word feminism appears a grand total of zero times in his post. Same old story for them, blind, uneducated, unwavering delusion to a cause that only their select group supports. To be honest…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:51 PM
34

Yep, this only serves to help the cause. The fact that she can write an article so filled with rage and hate only furthers our cause and the reason for the MRA movement to exist.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:39 PM
3

I guess we can personally thank Harry for helping our cause.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:10 PM
3

Man the feminists responding in this thread are seriously some cruel and heartless people. I don't even know how they live with themselves.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 08:14 PM
0

This is in no way, shape, or form, a legitimate post. Downvote and ignore folks, nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:43 AM
8

Not sure I understand your sentiment here, can you elaborate?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 08:49 PM
27

Sorry, can't edit the title. Obviously meant to say place of employment.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:30 PM
2

I agree, wholeheartedly. Please see the reply to the other comment.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:17 AM
3

Yeah it definitely should. Was just only stating that the way the law currently works, I don't believe the woman has to inform a man of anything when it comes to this process. Once she has recognized that she is pregnant, she can terminate or carry on with the pregnancy without the man knowing in any way. This includes placing his name on the birth certificate, legally binding him as the father of the child. Just as a fun fact? Even if the child wasn't his, he can potentially still be 100% liabl…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:16 AM
4

Pretty sure that this is not against the law to do.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:24 AM
3

The kid is 16 years old. Regardless of whatever you think about whether the boy enjoyed it, even WANTED it to happen, it's still rape. Doesn't matter if it the article implied she raped him or not, by definition, and by law, as the age of consent in the state of Florida is 18, it is rape.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:29 AM
2

You obviously don't understand the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:44 PM
3

I'm sorry for your loss.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:34 PM
6

At least you are comfortable with how incredibly ignorant you are.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:12 PM
2

Whoosh.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 04:51 PM
5

Oh boy everyone, time to get the galoshes out. Here comes the river of bigoted tears once again.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 01:07 AM
9

Some dumb troll, report and ignore everyone.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 12:15 AM
1

You're going to have to elaborate on that to have me take you seriously.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 03:26 AM
1

This literally makes no sense. The fact that someone, or anyone, does not welcome you to a dinner, does not at all equate to those individuals "could give a fuck less if you were alive."
/r/MensRights23/01/12 06:25 PM
6

This happens in every movement in existence. Do not let one bad apple influence your view on these types of issues because of one poor incident over the internet.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 11:02 PM
5

So, I didn't read to much into the definition (or the document linked at the bottom of the article) but what is defined as a "drug" in relation to this new change in the definition of rape? Cold medicine? Painkillers? Theoretically, birth control is a drug. How do we know what is and isn't applicable to this change and, more importantly, how in the world would we ever know they have ingested something considered a drug in relation to this definition? Not everything gives off some visible symptom…
/r/MensRights17/01/12 12:02 AM
4

Nice attempt at baiting, but I won't bite.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:30 PM
6

At least you're honest!
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:23 PM
1

GOD YOU ARE SUCH A FUCKING MANGINA HOLY SHIT
/r/MensRights12/01/12 03:41 AM
2

The thing is that nobody knows what actually happened here. She was recently forced into marryng some guy, so this could have been her attempt at running away or somehow getting out of the marraige. Well, obviously there's a lot more to the story than anyone knows. But if this is true, how does this justify falsifying any information that results in spending large amounts of time, money, and resources to find her? Maybe she was pregnant and wanted to get it taken care of? There could be a thousa…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 10:01 PM
3

It's rather amazing how much you twist words.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:39 PM
6

Insult me all you want, you still haven't shown that you are anything other than a troll.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:30 PM
7

Well, since you're lazy, I'll quote it for you. I would be interested to find out what the underlying reasons were for lying about being abducted. And I do say it was a lie because of the voicemail she left. That was obviously intended to be a ruse. How many stories have we read about accusations of kidnapping or rape being levied against either a real or imagined man to cover up illicit affairs? So, a person who makes a legitimate point, regarding the fact that there is a chance that she DID fa…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:28 PM
6

Well, at least you take no issues with the fact that you're a troll.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:15 PM
5

This is incredibly ironic.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:12 PM
3

I just reviewed the entire thread and found nothing of the sort. If it's here, quote it. Or, continue to grasp at straws. Your choice.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:12 PM
4

I...don't see anyone here claiming it's a false rape accusation? Ultimately, the bigger concern is that these types of situations, whether a rape accusation is present or filed or not, are literally just dropped. Take rape completely out of the picture for a second. As a spectator to the story, would it not make you angry to hear that, male or female, someone had done this when there was nothing inherently wrong? This type of behavior shouldn't be excused, in any scenario. Even if someone here w…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 08:14 PM
9

yuore Ahh, SRS in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:02 PM
6

Alright, just know that we could have just as easily put together a similar post that supported our thought process and posted it in whatever subreddit you frequent. And hopefully, you'd see that my posts historically have never been troll posts, unlike your own, and you would want to engage in some civil discussion. And at the end I would put: I am a MRA, thank you. This is why.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 01:54 PM
11

You know, I was actually wanting to engage in some civil discussion after reading your post. Then I checked your post history. You aren't interested in this movement. You aren't interested in what we have to say about anything that you addressed in your post. You as a troll, and most likely a feminist, are here to just post shaming language and insult us. You're not even worth the time.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 01:10 AM
1

EDIT: Saw your response below regarding this, removing statement.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 12:26 AM
2

Just ignore, these are the same moronic fucks that keep spouting this Manhood101 bullshit and going "LOL FAGGOT MANGINAS." It's literally like 12 dudes who watched some shitty youtube video and went, "YEAH! FUCK WOMEN!" and now they feel like they're enlightened and can hold a conversation with someone on the internet without swallowing their tongue first.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 01:31 AM
1

The reason why this is a big deal is because it exists in way more than just a chocolate commercial here and a beer commercial there. Attraction has no bearing on how the message would be perceived. If a man, attractive or not, said this to a woman, it would be deemed disgusting. The media is dominated by messages like this. Either showcasing something like whats in the OP, which is very sexist, but also always showcasing the man as an imbecile. In the grand scheme of things, this is one of the …
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:04 PM
7

Just let it be, he/she has never made a valid point or argument here....or in any other subreddit for that matter.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 02:47 PM
1

Just remember its never worth getting mad over. Most SRS trolls just come in spouting off using words they don't even fully understand or comprehend.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 03:36 PM
1

Nothing to see here, just your standard ignorant SRS troll. Report and move along.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 09:22 PM
1

This doesn't change the fact that this is a common occurrence for women to falsely accuse. And to state clearly, I am not justifying what the man did in this situation.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 09:13 PM
1

your reading comprehension and reasoning skills are extremely poor. This is incredibly ironic.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 06:33 PM
2

I think that if you sleep with crazy, you get what's coming to you. Sex should not be something we do just for fun without thinking of consequences. I agree. If you don't know your partner isn't crazy and deceptive, don't sleep with them. If they turn out to be crazy and deceptive anyway, I'm sorry for your situation, but it's still your situation. It's your baby, there shouldn't be a legal loophole that erases that. As opposed to any situation where a woman has the right to abort the child unde…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:58 PM
1

So, referencing the picture in the OP, you still believe this to be true? You're stating that in these cases, a man should still be required to be financially responsible for a child that he potentially didn't want at all, and only exists because his significant other deceived him? I really want to believe you aren't condoning or accepting this type of behavior, but it seems with this post that you are.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:26 PM
1

So, even if a man were to do the things you mention here....you are still condoning that this behavior is acceptable? The whole point is that we SHOULD have the ability and/or right to do something about it.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 05:43 AM
3

Nothing to see here folks, just your average troll. Report and ignore, per usual.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 10:23 PM
5

Please stop trolling.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:14 PM
4

You still have yet to make a single relevant point in this entire conversation. You went from attempting to justify your point to just making backhanded remarks. Learn to clarify points if you are going to make them instead of deflecting over and over and over.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter