TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mctowelie Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by mctowelie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If you want the proper 1984 speak it would be "doubleplusunthin"
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 03:04 PM
2

In your original comment your advice was to read and work out. I explained how some games can be as good, if not better, than reading. And then you said watching sports adds value (possess the ability to talk sports and you can find something to talk about with virtually any other guy). I don't think I'm too far off by saying the same can be true of games. I talk about them with my friends in the same way that we talk about movies and sports. I don't want to get into a debate about the 'usefulne…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 07:36 PM
2

There's a wide range depending on the scope of the game and the players desire to complete side missions, so I'll give a range of 10-30 hours. I like to be more thorough so I usually go longer, so that I can explore the world the game developers made
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 05:34 PM
11

I disagree with your stance. I find a lot of single-player games to be like interactive books or movies. They tell a story, and it's the role of the player to drive the story forward. Players must solve puzzles and make decisions that can directly affect the story being told. Now, bear in mind there's a limit to how much one should spend on any one thing; but I think some video games are worth the time.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 03:38 PM
5

It's not just that it's fun; it's because they are fed this lie that says 'you can have it all in your 20s and then settle down in your 30s when you're past your prime.' The problem they are finding out is that they can't have both. This is why they rationalize, why the hamster spins as fast and as hard as it does.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 06:04 PM
14

If the mother wants to stress that lifestyle ok, that's fine. BUT, the mother must also clue in the daughter as to what lies on the other side of the carousel: the wall and an endless supply of cats. Who knows which choice the daughter might make, but at least she will have all the facts. ...I was going to say, if she chooses the carousel and hits the wall she will have no one to blame but herself. But we all know responsibility does not come easily with women.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 03:35 PM
3

Whenever I think of language, I think of this interview of Stephen Fry by Jonathan Ross. I want to believe that language should be untouched, but Stephen Fry makes a great point on the matter http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBOCHPCYnDw
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 10:42 PM
7

All of these things provide incentives for people to abandon traditional families and to become lesbians / gays I don't think people choose to be gay because it's more convenient. Either you are or you aren't, it's not really a choice.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 04:01 AM
2

I agree with your point. However, notice that the woman's assets were inherited from a previous marriage...isn't that a tad hypocritical?
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 11:16 PM
2

Sure their security hasn't been threatened in the U. S. but they don't really claim to be unsafe anymore. The only Jews who do make that claim are the ones in Israel, and they are surrounded by hostile nations
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:32 AM
5

To be fair the Jews have had people out to get them; their safety has been legitimately threatened many times throughout history. What's different about the Jews is that they focus on self improvement instead of focusing on acting the part of the victim. Jewish culture emphasizes education and personal initiative, which is why they are a powerful economic and political group
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:22 AM
6

The top comment in that thread is all I needed to read. This quote sums it up pretty well: Just because a woman has the right to carry a pregnancy (made by two) to term or not does not mean that the man has the right to not financially care for it. Both parents are financially responsible. The woman solely gets to decide whether or not the baby is born, while the man is on the hook and powerless to her choice. And then there's this: Currently the couple can make the choice with legal aid to have…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 03:03 AM
14

I wish it were true, that more people would see what we see. But you can tell that's not the case simply by how the OP words the beginning of the thread: What's your take on it? What do you think is the reason of this movement's existence? Do you think people who subscribe to this line of thinking are just stupid/assholes? Do you think there is a deeper reason as to why some men turn to this? If so, what do you think the reason(s) is (are)? If this was already discussed here or elsewhere, I'd li…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 06:11 PM
22

I don't think that's true. The people in that thread still seem to believe that TRP is a support group for scorned men who can't cope with rejection and instead choose to lash out at women. They don't understand that our goal is to improve ourselves; we don't hate the hamster we just try to understand and adapt to it. Plus, they believe that NAWALT nullifies almost anything red pillers say.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 05:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter