TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mdoddr Archive

View 4 posts and 819 comments by mdoddr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Now in 6th grade, my son tells me he’s tired of how opinions from minority groups are always taken seriously while his own views often get dismissed My son is starting to "notice" as well. People don't realize whats coming down the pipe. There will come a time, very soon, when straight white "cis" boys will throw up their hands and say "guess we should just form our own team and start fighting everyone else" And no amount of calling them "sexist" or "racist" or "homophobic" will deter them. Beca…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 12:35 PM
2

no, it was always weak ass. From day 1
/r/MensRights18/02/26 12:44 PM
1

there are women, men, transwomen (who are men), and transmen (who are women). There are no cis women or cis men.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 11:07 PM
1

Hardly what was claimed
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 05:03 PM
0

She should get a boyfriend
/r/MensRights27/05/25 10:19 AM
69

It's just like hand maids tale....
/r/MensRights23/03/25 01:05 PM
2

Wait....... did you think nobody knew this? That people aren't choosing to have babies? No.... people know this is just so obvious nobody bothers to mention it
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 09:27 AM
4

I'm just here to help define provocative
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 03:30 PM
8

Provocative is in the eye of the provoked
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 03:25 PM
2

4b is hilarious. I literally hope they keep it up beyond trumps presidency. I want them to have to explain it to their neige and nephews. "Well, a decade before you were born there was a bad man named trump....."
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:16 PM
3

Get the fuck out of there
/r/MensRights12/10/24 12:05 PM
27

It's hard, but does she not get that deep sense of satisfaction from being a woman who provides for her family? Cause men get that
/r/MensRights26/08/24 11:37 AM
84

a pig appears and wanders into the women's camp. They name it and start worrying about how to feed and care for it. Because they have no food for themselves. ...
/r/MensRights30/07/24 11:02 AM
3

which just shows that when you say "man" they think of a white man by default.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 12:52 PM
1

Blacks are killing blacks. Do you denounce black lives matter?
/r/MensRights24/11/23 03:43 PM
1

Right but these weren't tall women. They were men dressed as women Or it's just two women in the 99.999 percentile who both also like sexual assault.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 05:34 PM
0

Common sense
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:37 PM
1

Trans women exist. They are men Embrace it
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:36 PM
1

Bro I've been on mensrights for over 15 years. Fuck. You. Saying I hate men. I am a man I have two sons You are a fucking retard
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:36 PM
0

Common sense? Both of them are super tall? One was wearing air jordans? Them being called women literally proves nothing because the media has decided to treat trans women like actual women? These are clearly trans women?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 01:12 PM
2

How can they "treat you like a man" if nothing is gendered?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 01:09 PM
1

They aren't women though
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:51 PM
0

They are men
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:50 PM
1

Luckily these aren't women
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:50 PM
1

These were men. So I guess you're the one whos a fucking idiot
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:49 PM
9

They were men
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:15 PM
22

"""""Women"""""
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:14 PM
0

Do you think they were right to become fascists?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:56 PM
0

why does anything "need to be done"? do you go down to the local high school and get involved in the dating lives of those kids?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:55 PM
0

WHY SHOULD I SUPPORT YOUR SIDE?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:53 PM
0

groan. So why should I support your side? You justify immoral acts based on the end goal, your enemies do the same.... how are you better?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:41 PM
0

We can hold on to our principles while acknowledging some hard choices will have to be made. So, setting up a revenge website to dox people because they doxxed people?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:39 PM
0

No, they should have stood by their principals and not become fascist, which is what I am arguing here. Do you think they were right to become fascists?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:38 PM
0

What are you doing?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:23 PM
0

Then why are you trying to justify doing so?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 07:09 PM
0

Why should you succeed if you do the same bad stuff? Of you twist data and hey women killed why should I support you?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 07:07 PM
1

that doesn't make it okay to be a hypocrite knowingly.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:20 PM
0

not if you're doing the same thing
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:20 PM
1

But we kind of skipped over talking about what is and isn't "good" can we agree that it isn't, couldn't be, and never will be, adopting the exact behaviours that cause you to oppose another group? They do under the table stuff to hurt you ?? who am "I" in this example? Am every man? this is weird thinking
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:53 PM
1

I repeat: you don't deserve to win if you don't have the moral high ground. In fact, other parties would be justified to oppose you. I'm sitting here coming into this from a neutral perspective. Why should I support your side? WHY SHOULD YOU WIN? If you adopt the evil actions of your opponents, how are you different?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:36 PM
1

Let me ask you this: why should I support your side and not the other?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:00 PM
1

why should I support you and not the other side? if you can't answer, why are you even on the side you are on?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:59 PM
0

you don't deserve to win if you don't have the moral high ground. In fact, other parties would be right to oppose you. Like, I'm sitting here coming into this from a neutral perspective. Why should I support your side?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:58 PM
1

correct you are EDITED
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:43 PM
1

I'll need proof of lives being destroyed for me to see this as anything above high school drama level
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:38 PM
0

who is the "other side" here? is it.... all women on the planet? Because "feminists" didn't make this shit. What does "victory" look like here? I'm worried about your answers
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:34 PM
-1

useful towards what? "WINNING!!"? if you have to become a monster to "WIN" you don't deserve to. If you oppose an evil and become that evil to stop it, others would be right to oppose you.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:27 PM
1

Yeah, who was that great philosopher that said "go ahead and become the very thing you are trying to stop because fuck it" ?Remember that guy? He said "Abandon all sense of right and wrong and just become a monster because victory over opponents is all that matters"... Why I can't remember the great thinker who expressed these ideas? Oh yeah, because it's fucking idiotic and despicable. If you abandon your principals or don't have any, you deserve to lose and you should lose because you have no …
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:25 PM
1

you guys dating multiple women? No? then who cares? This is happening because dating websites allow the top teir (10%) of men to access the top (80%) of women. The guys have incentives to date multiple women and the women all want to date the hottest guys - so they end up sharing them. Now nature is finding a solution, these jaded women are finding a way to sort out the mess they found themselves in. There are two groups of people caught up in this: 1) women who only want the bigger better deal …
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:50 PM
-2

Hey, maybe if we become absolute monsters we could win faster and more succinctly? Sure, we would have to become monsterous bad guys. And having monsterous bad guys in charge is probably worse that whatever we are trying to defeat. And HELPING monsterous bad guys win sounds like bad guy stuff to me but hey.... as long as we are the bad guys.... it's good? but uh.... well what was your argument again? Something retarded? EDIT: downvotes with no response? How bout this, one of you geniuses find me…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:33 PM
0

A defendable position? Otherwise you just descend into a power struggle of one group versus the other where both groups share the same "might makes right" principal? What are you fighting for if you abandon the moral high ground? Just for your group to win? Why do you deserve victory at that point?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:30 PM
1

so just.... never get laid?
/r/MensRights13/01/23 04:07 PM
1

alpha widowed
/r/MensRights13/01/23 04:04 PM
1

It's like if a scientologist ran your HR dept. and kept calling you "thetan infested" or whatever they think is wrong with regular people.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:27 PM
5

Stop telling my little boys that they are rapists and that the suffering of women in the past is somehow their responsibility
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:49 PM
3

suffrage sŭf′rĭj noun The right or privilege of voting; franchise. The exercise of such a right. A vote cast in deciding a disputed question or in electing a person to office. suffering suf·​fer·​ing noun 1 : the state or experience of one that suffers 2 : pain
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:47 PM
1

Yes but women in Ontario don't want to go topless. apparently
/r/MensRights17/04/22 03:34 AM
4

not all women either
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:16 PM
7

What an idiotic standard. If you like people touching a spot, you have to keep it covered? Oh, no, it must be that if other enjoy touching it? No no, can't be that, if it is typical for members of your sex to experience pleasure then you must cover even if you don't? Get off it. Plenty of men like having their nipples touched, many women don't.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:16 PM
3

The tits occupied .00000001% of their field of vision. The people were next to them for god's sake. Look FORWARD!!
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:13 PM
20

seriously go to France. I watched a kids TV show kind of a Saturday afternoon, live action adventure show about a lady archaeologist in the Victorian Era. She took her top off in a scene. Boobs. Kids don't even notice. There's boobs in shampoo commercials, boobs on the news, boobs in Marie Claire magazine. Once you adjust to boobs it's fine. Kids suck on them when they're babies. They'll be fine seeing them.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:09 PM
93

came here to say this. "society won't let us go topless!!" "okay go topless then" ".... well... I mean.. I don't want to.... but there may be... other girls..."
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:04 PM
-1

Whats the ratio on shoveled driveways:laundry loads? Cause I feel like its definitely like 1:5 at least. Or if you could tell me how many vacuumings you can get for one staying up all night pumping water out of your flooding basement?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:42 PM
6

I sat in a university class as they explained that women are forced to do the majority of the housework by men even nowadays. I asked how they were forced and it was explained that by not doing it, the men are forcing the women to do it. I wanted to ask "why don't the women just not do it" but I know the answer: they (the particular women in question) want it done. They give a shit. They think crumbs on the floor is a real problem. I wanted to tell all the young men in the class to wait until th…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:39 PM
2

they still want someone who is higher status than them.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 05:27 PM
6

okay but.... why were they playing together in the first place?
/r/MensRights20/10/21 05:28 PM
1

"no, not really" everyone in that image.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 01:58 PM
7

This is a thing I have trouble putting in words but here goes: The complaints feminists make are reflections of what society believes but they phrase it as something society does not believe. The opposite of everything they say is true. Feminists are like the nagging critical mothers of society. They only speak in negatives. They can't say "we are rightly focused on protecting women" they instead say "we don't focus on protecting women enough" -- but both of these statements reflect a desire to …
/r/MensRights24/09/21 11:19 AM
18

she wasn't even raped but she thinks she has it worse.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:09 PM
1

this woman will blame you for mestruating
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:09 PM
2

too bad your advice (just don't have those problems anymore) is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 03:07 PM
2

Okay, I'm a 40 yo married man with two kids, but yeah you're the big brain with empathy right?
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:39 AM
2

Just learn? Why not just learn how to pick up chicks? Why not just learn how to be cool and suave and get laid? anything less is a cop out, right? every problem can be solved by just learning how not to have that problem anymore. BOOM! why don't homeless people learn how not to be homeless? BOOM solved homelessness! If you have a moment of self reflection you would see that you are the one taking a cop out. You just hand wave away the problem and say "apply solutions" as though you are actually …
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:27 AM
12

Right.... because someone who is socially awkward will have no problem locating a prostitute and arranging an illicit sexual liaison with them. They can just ask their parents how to go about it.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:52 PM
6

in the book Sapiens by Yuval Harari there is a part where Harari wonders why we ever switched from hunting and gathering to agriculture. He explains how much more labour intensive agriculture was. He never comes up with an answer. But I have a theory. It's the same reason why people have walk in closets.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:25 PM
1

sure, but they're mostly women
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:11 PM
18

Oh yeah.... feminists will be in a big rush to defend Andre "bitch forgot to eat a dick and shut the fuck up" Young. This is not a reflection of my own opinions. Chronic 2001 was a masterpiece.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 11:08 PM
4

unless it's something negative about women. Then it's indicative of deep seated misogyny in all of society, right?
/r/MensRights19/07/21 07:10 PM
5

okay... which comments?
/r/MensRights19/07/21 07:08 PM
3

So I was totally right!...... when I said I was probably wrong....
/r/MensRights15/07/21 08:39 AM
0

my sister lived in South Korea for years. Which makes me, sort of, not an expert at all. But I do know that it has pretty crazy gender roles. It would be very hard to infer anything universal from whats going on there. The only thing I can really remember is that Mother's in law are horrible to daughters in law. And... this is probably 95% wrong and misremembered... there is like a thanksgiving kind of holiday that is pretty much centred around the MIL abusing the DIL. This is all perpetuated by…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:44 PM
2

years ago my sister called me sexist because I told her that I rolled my eyes when Patricia Arquette called for equal rights for women in the United states. the other day she recommended an episode of Candice Owens podcast to me. people change. Maybe her having a daughter has something to do with it. She also reached peak trans and has been color pilled.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 11:58 AM
6

Right? If a drunk woman's "yes" can't be taken at face value, should I take anything she says seriously? If she says she want's to go home... does she? If she wants a burger.... does she really? How can I know? She's incapable of accessing her true desires. It's tough because... as a man it's apparently up to me to figure out what she wants. Even if I'm drunk.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:16 PM
-3

It's a religious thing. Like writing G*d
/r/MensRights29/03/21 04:59 PM
7

Internalized misogyny - Women fully different from men in every way - also no biological difference.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 02:43 PM
28

"IRRELIVANT>women don't kill. Men toxic. toxic masculinity. Patriarchy. Beep boop" I'm playing morons advocate here.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 11:15 AM
24

"They wouldn't be killed by women - they more peaceful - toxic masculinity" their response probably
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:57 AM
14

Hear that men? You have to fix all of your personal flaws before you even think about dating. Or, at the very least, shove all your problems down inside and never express any of you're negative emotions. But also don't be a toxic male who's afraid to show his emotions.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:06 PM
1

"classy woman" not in that top girlfriends /sassyness
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:03 PM
3

thank you
/r/MensRights13/10/20 10:09 PM
1

Sarkesian was also part of developing a video game at one point. Critics were quick to point out how she utilized many of the tropes she had decried in her videos. Because it turns out you can't depict a woman without stereotyping in some way.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 10:01 AM
22

no seriously, is it? It doesn't seem to be a satire site.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:16 PM
1

you can say that again...
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:05 AM
9

They would say "Duuuuur women have never had power ever lol wot r u on about?" as if that's a) true or b) the point.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 12:29 AM
12

I think the idea is fine. It would be fun if it was done in a good natured way. But of course if its just an excuse for cackling...
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:27 AM
1

Canada, normal to circumcise here
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:17 PM
2

the fact all my coworkers in combat arms are dudes, and my bosses drug addict wife got both his kids so he quit and tried to kill himself
/r/MensRights29/08/19 09:49 AM
4

"disruptive social consequences" = "we have to stop all this drag kid stuff" oh no
/r/MensRights14/08/19 10:03 AM
5

what are y'all referencing?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/19 04:49 PM
1

They aren't even attractive chairs. The award is literally for "pushing the agenda"
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:38 PM
1

Yeah but those ideas are patriarchal. Check. mate. /s
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:30 PM
1

Ha. I'm in Canada. so I guess context matters
/r/MensRights11/06/19 10:59 AM
3

except we seem to always be capitulating to the extreme left and not to the extreme right.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 02:04 AM
6

It would work if every other coffee shop would pick super niche sexual and racial identities to tailor to. Then they wouldn't have to compete with anyone.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:25 PM
2

yeah CBC radio!
/r/MensRights16/04/19 08:33 PM
1

So what do they want then? Traditional gender norms or no?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 12:03 PM
4

Perhaps no woman is capable of understanding, truly, what is always on the line when you are a man, and how feminism and its toxic rhetoric threatens so very much of it. Perhaps no woman can recognize the sinister in feminism’s actions because she has not endured them—in some form or another—for the whole of her life. fixed it
/r/MensRights06/03/19 02:54 PM
2

Gloria Steinem included as a Feminist. But remember, if you ever point out how batshit horrible she was "SHE'S NOT A REAL FEMINIST!!!!"
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:46 PM
3

Will be hilarious to watch feminist screeching grow increasingly impotent as men realize they could just fuck robots.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:33 PM
2

keeping us confused and to leave room for criticism no matter what we do/say You mean toxic femininity?
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:29 PM
1

Not teaching your kids about rough and tumble play is more likely to lead to the situation you say is being depicted. One kid not fighting back because their mom yelled at them any time they even adopted an aggressive stance. The other kid not knowing the limits of their strength and how much pain they can cause.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 02:36 PM
1

"That's not how we treat each other... I know you want to play fight. But that's BAD! It's a toxic thing inside of you that is wrong. So.... here take these pills"
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:40 PM
2

287k downvotes right now
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:28 PM
29

I wrestle with my sons, EVERY. FUCKING. DAY. They love it, they beg for it, it makes them confident and happy. When they wrestle each other they are laughing and smiling. it's NOT Toxic
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:38 PM
1

Oh yeah? Well maybe I have no idea what I'm talking about and I was just writing grumpy comments all hung over on new years? And maybe I'll just shut up now?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 05:12 PM
2

Because there are no men who carry feminist ideology? I'm sorry but is everyone thinking that OP will reach out to the NPO and they'll, what?, stop sexist custody hearings? Misandry will just end? No, he'll see how deep it runs.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:21 PM
-1

oh, your trying to show him how deep this shit runs
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:46 PM
1

That's when it is murder.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 01:51 PM
1

No it didn't. It was pointless and off topic. Also: you are the one that justified bringing it up because it's a hot topic. No need to get bent out of shape when i rephrase your statement to show how ridiculous it is.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:27 PM
1

"Its worth mentioning because so many people seem to think so"
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:01 PM
1

but not worth mentioning any more than people being born with 11 fingers is
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:20 PM
1

If I said humans have ten fingers you wouldn't feel the need to but in with irrelevant nonsense. Why did you feel the need to do it here? Because you are trying to push spectrum non-sense.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:14 PM
0

Humans have ten fingers. Some don't but that doesn't mean that we say fingers exist on a spectrum
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:43 PM
1

What the hell are the filling all these books with if feminism is "nothing more than the belief that women are people"
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:18 PM
8

all the more reason to do it
/r/MensRights27/05/18 12:04 AM
1

Seriously can you even answer the question of why you are wasting your time here? Reflect on that. It will never turn out to be an indication of you being a great person
/r/MensRights24/04/18 06:52 PM
1

Gabe you ever learned self reflection?
/r/MensRights24/04/18 05:08 PM
1

Then why are you wasting your time writing comments no one will believe?
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:33 PM
6

It's just easier to do that. Otherwise you get bogged down trying to argue about all of history instead of focusing on contemporary issues.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 05:31 PM
1

yeah, and it will still go to hot blonds who like to smile and have fun.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:34 AM
2

She dresses exactly how a woman who doesn't care about being attractive would dress. She's so smart but she can't figure out that she should try to accentuate a curve? Is she wearing a sports bra? She looks like a tortilla in drag. I know that she's British but does she have to be the epitome of frump?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:42 PM
1

It's about both of those things
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:04 AM
5

they do need to. they were a little shit.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:05 PM
5

He's fine with transsexuals. He was speaking out against a law in Canada that would make not using pronouns a hate crime
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:43 AM
1

what the hell is a humank?
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:08 AM
8

It assumes that there is a right and wrong, or better and worse way of doing things. So yeah, nazism
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:36 PM
1

gotta save something for the next film
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:04 PM
1

just like the "patriarchy" is actually good for humanity.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:22 PM
26

No, no, going postal is caused by toxic masculinity /s
/r/MensRights27/11/17 02:23 AM
2

I mean, you joke, but there is such a high probability of a Trudeau sex scandal. Like, as if he's not getting some on the side.
/r/MGTOW14/10/17 02:41 PM
6

This whole "slingblade" thing.... it's not working
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:35 AM
5

Because they are the ones who invented household cleanliness standards in the first place. There a pile of stuff over there. Is it "mess"? That depends entirely on the woman's opinion of the pile. There are dishes in the sink. Do they need to be done before bed? Woman's decision. Does the fridge need to be cleaned? What about the floor? How often does the toilet get cleaned? Who has veto on these decisions? Women. How bad is it if these things don't get done? up to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 01:06 PM
2

You'd be dead or in a Gulag
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:17 PM
1

They would all be in Gulags by that point anyways for resisting the fair and equitable redistribution of their stolen wealth to the proletariat
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:05 PM
18

This video. This 16-minute fucking video. I've watched it 20 time already. All the questions that were nagging me. All the things that made me just say "I... can't... it just doesn't.... I don't..." and just give up. He fucking nailed it. I try not to exaggerate but this video took me to the other side of something inside myself. Resolution. Clarity. I can put so much to rest. It's not a leftist philosophy or a right wing philosophy. It's just like: "yo, this it the world, and it's not that bad,…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/17 02:20 PM
1

The idea in the original remark isn't untrue because other people would misinterpret what it means, and misapply it. The fact that the extreme left (who in Jordan Peterson's interpretation are themselves operating from a perspective of resentment for the rich/successful rather than care for the poor/oppressed) Would accuse you of being hateful doesn't mean that you are and thus that JP is wrong. people misinterpret and misapply things all the time. Doesn't mean its trash
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 02:15 PM
1

well, sure but there will also be another NDP party composed of all the people who resigned over this sexism.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 07:45 PM
5

You're a pretty creepy dude. You've posted multiple times about these instagram girls. Plus you put their pictures up on other subreddits saying they "need cum". These are just individuals living their lives. Stop being gross.
/r/PussyPass26/12/16 06:30 PM
1

Can you short sell a movie somehow?
/r/TheRedPill17/12/16 10:35 PM
1

They also say this isn't her fault because the hormones produced during pregnancy make you more maternal, so she isn't responsible for the choices she makes because.... female hormones take away free will. So women are just leaves blowing in the wind. Even when they have agency it's actually an illusion. They are actually slaves to their hormones. But that makes them victims all the more!
/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:38 PM
3

I'm hoping you guys can help me with this. My sister fell pregnant towards to the end of her secondary college days. She was all excited about having a child. She set up his room for him, bought him clothes and so on. She has had a tough time balancing being a mother and her social life. We've helped her as much as we can, but it seem like it was not enough for her. My sister told me that she no longer wants to be a mother. She told me she misses going out and partying. I told her she gave that …
/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:11 PM
2

Thanks so did I
/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:08 PM
3

Oh, or posts about: My spouse is getting fat, or my spouse won't do housework - are handled so much differently if the poster is male or female. Domestic violence used to be so biased. but I think they got brigaded enough that the message got through finally.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:24 PM
2

Ok, sorry bout that. Now I know for next time. I'm worried I may have gotten the post locked
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:22 PM
45

I got banned for this: https://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/599ryl/my_20f_sister_19f_has_a_son_1_year_old_and_has/d970aee/ Just in case it isn't visible: I think you're forgetting that this is young woman you're talking about. This kind of tone and rhetoric may be apt if this were a man who didn't want to be anchored down by a child. But this is a woman who, of her own free will, decided to have sex, possibly without proper protection, to not abort when she discovered she was pregnant…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 04:29 PM
5

Literally completely the opposite of the truth
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:13 PM
2

Yeah, voting based on the percentage of tax they pay sounds like a GREAT idea! So rich people should have more votes right? yeah that would work out so awesome for everyone. What a smart idea.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 01:22 PM
1

I often find that what I'm really upset about is the disconnect in how logic is applied in both situations. It's not that I want outrage over both. But there should be outrage over both if you want to feel outrage over one. Then when you realize that the reason there isn't outrage is just literal sexism it can be rather frustrating. Then when I'm expected to accept a narrative based on this dubious logic I just can't do it.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:57 AM
1

I read that years ago. It was one of the first times I really said "there is some weird hypocrisy going on here".
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:14 PM
1

Toxic Euphemising.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:28 PM
4

Yeah but if you accuse a specific person of stealing your purse they don't just arrest that person and throw them in jail. There needs to be proof that they took your purse.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 02:05 PM
-2

It's really just a semantic issue. What does the word "woman" mean? Donganator obviously believes that it refers to something specific. It's kind of hard to say who's right because the meaning of the word isn't designed to address the existence of transgendered persons. So really there is no right or wrong, just opinions. The meaning of the words "woman" and "man" will probably change but that isn't settled up yet.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:51 AM
1

I wish she's thrown acid in his face so the parallel was clearer
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:15 PM
23

logic? smells like mansplaining to me
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:48 PM
37

but don't dare say that women become irrational when they're on their period
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:45 PM
1

Well... yes, I'm trying to insult you.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:13 AM
1

Right, but you are trying to make that point in a really dumb way that doesn't work.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 12:11 AM
1

Since I'm sure this is a rhetorical question why don't you just explain to me why you think it matters if I have any STATISTICS concerning fish living in the sea. If I said I did? What then? What if I didn't?
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:52 PM
2

don't be stupid, you know that people could provide mounds of evidence that fish live in the sea.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:34 PM
1

But a reasonable person calling themselves a feminist is better? Isn't that an organization that is known for its crazy prejudice?
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:09 PM
1

This is pre 9/11
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:58 AM
1

Yup, I thought it was fishy, came here to say so, and the top post beat me to it.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:43 AM
1

The way I see it, if I enter a stranger's house with my kids I'm trusting them as much as they are trusting me.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:40 AM
1

If that had been intended as a satirical joke then it would have been very clever.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 01:48 AM
6

yeah, because as she the marketing company edited the video she they started to realize that what she they had wasn't really an indictment of men in general, it was an indictment of certain men. Namely Blacks and Hispanics. Since it's perfectly acceptable in our society to say "men (in general) are scum" but not okay to say "Black and Hispanic men are scum" - which I am not saying - she they had to say that there were white men they just got edited out. Otherwise the statement that her their vid…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:19 AM
2

Yeah we wonder why men have such a "conquering" attitude towards sex. Then feminists themselves reinforce society's view that a man that doesn't get laid consistently is a pathetic loser pseudo-male
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:07 PM
5

Hey, remember that hilarious MRA sketch she did on SNL? yeah....
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:29 AM
5

He's using male privilege against her. He deserves it!
/r/MensRights08/10/14 10:18 AM
4

When I was a child we had an old "Know Your Health" encyclopedia. It had a whole volume about growing up and the human body. There was a part for dating and family life. I used to read it with my sister and laugh at the patronizing tone they used towards women. It was exactly this kind of stuff. "Make sure to have the house ready for your husband when he comes home. He will have worked hard all day don't bother him with your problems."
/r/MensRights01/10/14 03:40 AM
9

its very obvious that the only person defending anyones right to hit anyone was whoopi's collegues. They were arguing that a woman is allowed to hit a man consequence free.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:21 PM
1

Another good one about "Feminist Biology"
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:41 PM
6

I'm also in a Canadian university and I can say I'm really surprised how open minded people are to new ideas about gender. I expected that there would be a lot of crazy feminists or people who just drank the Kool Aid but I'm finding that anytime I inch my way into the subject tentatively I find people saying "yeah it's crazy how women are always right or women are just treated like they're not capable of making the wrong decisions whenever they make a bad one." It's actually surprising but I wil…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 02:31 PM
2

especially when there isn't enough money. If we have to pick between the basics and loftier, less tangible goals I think we should focus on the basics.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:07 PM
4

think vaselinepete is trying to describe a scenario where you are stumbling mumbling eyes half closed drunk. Like, you can't get the person off of you because you've got the spins and barley know what's happening. Maybe not. But I see where you're both coming from. The above scenario is obviously rape but making a stupid decision to fuck somebody because "you're drunk" is no excuse. It's a blurry line. That's why we should look down on people who take advantage of other people being drunker than…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:39 PM
0

don't waste yor time looking
/r/MensRights15/01/14 03:53 AM
2

I bet some of the people working to shut this program down had their bachelors in womens studies. Why does your wife's opinion trump theirs? Also, what do you think would piss your wife off more here? That these feminists worked directly against equality? or that it made feminism look bad? who do you think she'll be more concerned about?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 03:43 AM
1

hilarious
/r/MensRights08/01/14 11:00 PM
86

Don't worry people will stop eye raping you (checking you out) eventually. When you're old and ugly. ... then you'll miss it....
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:45 PM
3

Protip: stop starting comments with "protip:"
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:33 PM
4

There's a really great episode of radiolab about this. It blew my mind. Part of it deals with people who have had brain damage/surgery. They then do really bad things directly because of the changes to their brain. The question is asked: Is it their fault? The natural question then is if anyone is responsible for anything they do. The neurologists say no. I don't really know what to think myself but the episode is really good
/r/MensRights30/12/13 02:40 AM
0

Sorry, I don't disagree at all just need things spelled out. What's the weapon/tool? Shaming tactics?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:26 PM
20

so you knew exactly what I meant but felt the need to correct me anyways.... thanks
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:25 PM
16

no. I want birth control to be covered because the cost of unwanted children is comparatively enormous
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:23 PM
98

I think people should have free access to birth control. Condoms too.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:46 PM
2

They will get around to it!!! okay!? As soon as they get a bunch of women who don't even want to to go into engineering. Then they can address all the men dieing. I mean.... pffft obviously one is more important than the other.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 05:04 PM
3

Came here looking for more context. Thank you, it makes sense in this context as it's responding to a specific type of censorship. Reminds me of the law in florida where nipples have to be airbrushed of of shirtless men (makes WWF ads very funny). If someone put out a magazing with a bunch of nipples on it I would think it was totally appropriate. This isn't so much about "womens genitals all in your face!!" it's more "This is what they actually look like, deal with it" Anyone wanna make a "deal…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:52 PM
2

they smelled the menstruation.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:46 PM
3

JtO seems a little less effective debating in person. TBH if I was debating someone and they bogged the whole thing down by debating what constitutes a majority I wouldn't really know what to say either. It a math term. It's not debatable at all. I would totally have to take a second to gather my thoughts.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:37 AM
1

all these videos are from the same day
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:34 AM
1

FUCK YOU I"LL RAPE AND MURDER EVERYONE EVER!!!!!!
/r/MensRights28/07/13 01:13 PM
9

Or if men who have money (enough to give away some) may also be more likely to be married and have women in their lives.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 11:58 AM
3

"Okay, good go guys, let's do a few more takes. Remember slap him 4 times in a row. REAL SLAPS!!!!" Like the guys face wouldn't be spaghetti by the end. No, the slaps have to be real for the PSA. they aren't making citizen kane for christ's sake. They're fake slaps.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 10:43 AM
0

Don Cheadle is an actor not a hotel in Rwanda
/r/MensRights28/07/13 10:41 AM
20

sure... but it's feminism that says patriarcy is a) a thing. b) saying all those things. So feminism is really just creating an enemy for themselves and then trying to say that that enemy is also the enemy of everyone else.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 09:31 AM
2

priviledge isnt really gendered though. Some people are priviledged in some ways other people in other ways. One persons priviledge is another persons constraint.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:16 PM
1

YES. It will be such a farce. I can't even imagine.. Please make it
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:11 PM
5

It seems like if you don't absolutely adhere to a prescribed set of beliefs you are a bigot. Saying "women are oppressed in North America? How so?" is the same as saying "Rape is good"
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:53 PM
11

So, when you read something try to make sure that you don't read it in an angry voice in your own head.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:50 PM
1

Sorry, are you a feminist? I just need to know if you're being serious.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:03 PM
1

The thing is you are taking the stance of an apologist. You're trying to minimize the bad and emphasize the good. You're jumping through hoops trying to explain to us why feminism is still good at it's core, or something. But we're trying to say feminism needs to do some auditing. They need to address the issues under their own umbrella. Since you claim to be a feminist we're putting the responsibility on you to do it. But instead you want to hand wave the issues away and insist the good out wei…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:19 PM
1

Who represents real feminism? What can you point to and say "that person, or that group, is feminism pure."? And how confidant are you that there could be some kind of consensus among self identifying feminists on whether they represent feminism or not?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:12 PM
1

That is a perfect question. Who or What group is the flagship of Feminism?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:09 PM
1

You would only stop supporting them after that? I realize this is all a bit hypothetical and silly but surely you see how saying that plays exactly into the point Alzael was trying to make: That your support strengthens a system that does things you don't even agree with. (? - I'm unsure where to drop this question mark.)
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:05 PM
2

That's exactly what I was just thinking. Shifting goalposts anyone?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:05 AM
8

The annoying thing about that comic is it acts as though it's somehow possible to shout over people in a web forum. In a non linear conversation, like in an internet forum, you can respond to whatever posts you like. It's not a dinner party. you don't need mods to silence someone for "dominating the discussion". Just don't read those comments
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:03 AM
1

Combined with the other keyword "women" there's no need for thought at all.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:41 AM
8

The Diva Cup is like a weird looking little silicon cup. It goes into the vagina and blocks the flow of menstrual blood from the cervix. Then it gets emptied out and re inserted. It's a reusable alternative to tampons or pads.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 04:20 PM
1

So what is the overall goal or message of democrats? If it isn't the democratic stance as a whole than what one thing is it? who decides what it is?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:30 AM
1

But can you be a christian and not believe in Christ?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:52 PM
2

I'm confused are you saying that you the amount of alignment that you personally feel someone should have will vary from person to person? And that you will just decide arbitrarily? Who whims make it arbitrary?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:04 PM
1

no, I'm trying to understand your point of view. Like an adult
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:44 PM
1

So what percentage alignment do you think is necessary? 50%? would you have a problem with George W. Bush identifying as a democrat?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:34 PM
6

So you're only referring to card carrying members of the democratic party?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:21 PM
6

Please answer the following question: What is a democrat?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:12 PM
14

You can't be a democrat and disagree with the democratic party's official stance. This is the problem with adopting a label for yourself.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:55 PM
23

if they disagreed then they wouldn't be feminists. Therefor they wouldn't be the feminist men she's talking about. You can't be a feminist and disagree with feminism.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:31 PM
1

Everyone is flawed. If feminists, or anybody, expects equality to come in the form of idealized media portrayals they're an idiot.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 06:00 PM
4

I meant what I said. Go have your abortion debate somewhere else please.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:23 AM
4

Exactly. He was wrong to murder the unborn child. Women have a special right here in that they must carry and deliver the child. I believe they have the right to refuse to do so through abortion if they wish. A man preventing a woman from having a child they wish to have is doing wrong. But when one looks at the phenomenon of drop off centers for babies built in response to women murdering their newborns and the justifications given for their necessity we see a sympathy for women who murder thei…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:34 PM
2

because that's exactly whats happening in abusive relationships. It's not reciprocal. It's a cute, well dress, little white girl, and her boyfriends is just relentlessly screaming a slew of obscenities at her.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 01:57 PM
4

Exactly. The Audience pays to be there because they get to hobnob with the Ted talkers. The Ted talkers do their dance for free because they get to hobnob with the big wigs and with each other. The big wigs get paid because they want money.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 02:39 AM
0

When people write about you in history books it will be better if they know your real name.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:17 PM
3

The idea if being yourself is hardly unique to feminism.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:06 AM
5

Oh, I must have forgotten that gender roles no longer exist. My bad
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:15 AM
7

You forgot to mention one example of feminism helping men
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:03 AM
1

That's the opposite of the plot.... the shrew is the woman...
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:28 PM
1

and that was the only thing the protest was about. That post. Without that post the entire rape culture protest would have had no basis. The evidence of rape culture that they were so outraged about was entirely fabricated. They would have nothing to point to without it.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:08 PM
1

I wonder this everyday about almost everything....
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:09 PM
6

Pffft everyone knows dogs are boys and cats are girls.... jeez
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:04 PM
1

That was what I wanted to know. If it's optional I truly feel this will damage feminism more than help. The people who take this class and believe it are going to be future radfems anyways. Meanwhile young rebellious people are going to get a lot more passive exposure to the type of feminism that only a young ignorant angst ridden teen can emit. I can easily see a lot of students going about their day annoyed by the new radicalized group floating around the school. It will bring people's contrad…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:14 PM
1

Many readers were moved by the article and had high praise for the author. A few wondered if it was a parody placed by a wily men’s rights activist posing as a feminist blogger—trying to put Jezebel feminists in a bad light. In fact, the author is listed on the masthead as a regular contributor. Bah hahaha. So, feminists can't even tell anymore if the article they are reading is a satire of feminism or genuine feminism. "I agree with this article about cereal mascots but I also wonder if it's ac…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:01 PM
6

NO NO NO! Female sexuality is oppressed. Men are allowed to do whatever they want! Right? cause like.... slut shaming or... Whisper videos aren't even sexual....
/r/MensRights01/05/13 01:50 PM
3

That's how etymology works
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:39 AM
5

No, that's stupid. If teaching critical thinking is so important there should be a class on critical thinking.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:38 AM
2

By the logic of alcohol consumed = unable to consent Makes it so you are not responsible for your actions at all when drunk. If you lose all agency after a few drinks then why is it your fault if you drive and kill someone?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:54 PM
1

Call it patriarchy or call it something else how about society?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:51 PM
1

dude, relax. Bunknee is being civil and polite. You on the other hand are being a total ass. "go fuck yourself, you stupid bitch"? what the hell is wrong with you? I'd rather have bunknee here than you. You're vile. You're being downvoted by MRAs because you're embarrassing us.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:30 PM
2

Oh yes, the example of the protesters in Egypt is great. hundreds of males being beaten, they are called "protesters". ONE woman gets hit and the UN says they are targeting women. Who were they targeting before and why was that not equally as awful? Then a bunch of female protesters come out to protest that. Not to protest for democracy or fight the tyranny of the state. To protest one woman getting exactly the same beating as hundreds of other men. And they chant "the blood of our brothers will…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:15 PM
3

Remember the Batman Theater Shooting? One guy neglected to throw himself over his girlfriend (if you can call a girl he's been on three dates with his "girlfriend"). He ran for the exit instead. She was fine. no injuries. But the very fact that a male failed to protect "his" woman by putting himself between her and danger was enough for multiple national news networks to publicly shame and mock him. Think about that and what it says about the male gender role. We expect a man to sacrifice himsel…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:59 PM
1

it's only the radical KKK members that are for race supremacy.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:42 PM
1

source?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:37 PM
1

"Mansplaining" has to be the most sexist concept to come out of feminist circles. I'm actually probably wrong about that but it's pretty shit. You're opinions are invalid due to your gender. Just awful
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:01 AM
1

just a buncha dicks in holes
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:58 AM
2

dudes getting raped
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:57 AM
1

That's absurd. You're being obtuse.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:50 PM
6

The "rights issue" is the double standard that this article highlights. Can you imagine if someone wrote an entire article bitching about his wife being useless and stupid and then said "therefore all women are useless and stupid. There would be outrage.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:47 PM
71

Sounds more like a hostage situation than a relationship. I wonder why his anxiety mounts? Knowing he's gunna be stuck at home with a passive aggressive resentful unsupportive spouse...
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:54 PM
2

NOW is the National Organization for Women.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:36 PM
6

Wasn't that an argument used against giving women more rights? That everything already was equal because men got things like the vote and women got things like dates being paid for? But now that it suits them...
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:44 PM
3

I think it should be someones choice, it's kinda fucked up that we do it, and it says a lot about societies view of men.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:39 PM
2

To me the nebulous indefinable nature of feminism is the problem in and of itself. What the hell is it? "the insane idea that women are people"? Because that doesn't account for activism. Is it what NOW does? Is it the protesters in videos? Is it the sum of what's taught in a woman's studies course? Some definitions of feminism would exclude prominent feminists or feminist organizations. What good is a definition of feminism that includes MRA's but excludes NOW? There doesn't really seem to be a…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:37 PM
5

Where?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 08:06 PM
11

You have never given any follow up counter argument since your initial statement.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:55 PM
10

Fine, I guess we'll all have to assume you have no arguments at all and simply can not back up your original statements. You are obviously flat out wrong so we all knew you would have no counter arguments but this is pretty funny anyways.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:42 PM
9

You just wasted a multiple precious comments on explaining why you can't make more comments. You should use that time to debate.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:34 PM
-4

If you've ever taken off your shirt with your buddies and then taken off your shirt in front of a bunch of girls you've felt the difference. You kinda just gotta suck it up. That's why you're working out anyways isn't it?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:47 PM
1

no. she just gets lower than she was previously when she was being held up. She was higher than she is now she's lower than she was.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:14 AM
-1

Yeah, but when I visualize that, like, with little cartoon characters of a man and a woman, the woman still ends up lower than before. She comes down to his level... on the ground... and gets lower... I just think visually... so...
/r/MensRights16/04/13 11:00 PM
3

Don't send her death threats for god sake. Seriously, what the fuck? Send her fan mail. I want to hear what she has to say. I secretly hope that she has a youtube channel that I haven't discovered. With opinion pieces. Lots of opinion pieces.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:52 PM
21

It's was just a sea of hiss. Nobody in the audience bought it.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:42 PM
113

That's Girlwriteswhat. She's a big player around here.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 12:42 AM
-1

What exactly happened? Your camera didn't catch the moments leading up to the attack. To me it looks as though someone attacks the masked protester.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:16 AM
0

It makes me imagine some type or Cruella deVille type person. Someone who would either ignore a child completely or say "Beat you little RAT!!"
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:43 PM
1

most people really...
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:38 PM
2

I blame twitters character count. Rogan never really says half cocked shit like that on his shows. But he is defiantly someone who has to hone what he says down to get the message right. On his podcast you can listen to him bounce an off the cuff remark around with his guest until he finds what he's really trying to say. Tl;dr: He's human
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:36 PM
1

I really wish we got to see the faces of the hecklers more often. Do they laugh at themselves? Are they just mortified? Would be interesting to see...
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:32 PM
2

just in case there is anyone who doesn't immediately understand: this is satire.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:51 PM
2

If you don't want to do housework, then fucking stop doing it. No one's going to beat you with a thumb-sized stick. needs to be put on a billboard
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:55 PM
1

you're being accused of copying and pasting your comment from somewhere else.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:47 PM
3

Because he absolutely destroys any argument you could make to support your beliefs?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:32 AM
2

so start talking between beers? weird...
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:04 AM
1

Also, being Muslim in a Muslim country is a super anti privilege
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:32 PM
4

How is it impolite to ask someone if they would like to do something or not?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:28 PM
9

He grows antlers for Christ's sake! It's over! there is no debate here!
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:32 AM
8

Bambi was male
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:54 AM
1

Oh, I get it.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:58 PM
9

Why not just go ahead and create a directory of all guys. Break their value down to numbers. Rank all men by their "datability". It would just be to help women find good dates.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:43 PM
2

Is it about the Men's Rights Movement or Men's Rights issues?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:36 PM
5

brings the facts
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:48 PM
2

Well carry on then
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:15 AM
7

Please leave this subreddit
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:37 AM
3

She assumed they were... so she went to a sperm bank.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:32 AM
8

Did you read the article? It's a quote from her son.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:31 AM
1

How is the content of the poster related to mens rights? Sounds like it's an anti feminism poster. This isn't what the efforts of a men's organization should be going towards
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:10 AM
1

That's how I feel about my girlfriend. I don't need her. I could get by without her. But I really love having her around.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:48 AM
3

"should married couples pay the same taxes as unmarried partners" "should women be executed in the US like men are" Your right to say we read these questions differently. The real question here is in which of these ways the survey question is being interpreted. I would be interested to see how the data turns out with the question worded differently.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 02:11 AM
1

I don't get why you're being downvoted. Do we really want members of the westborough baptist church here?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:15 AM
1

So what's your beef? That the post was a troll or the content of the post itself? If you fear MRAs arguing among themselves then you should take note that you are her causing a meta debate. Just downvote it if you don't like it.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:05 AM
3

I think you should have to get someones consent to cut off a chunk of their body.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:08 PM
1

Chris Brown is a total douche. I would pay to see Adele beat him up because that would be awesome. It would be awesome if anyone beat him up. Tl:dr This isn't a gender issue. it's a douchebag issue.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:02 PM
15

If a woman wants to be in a relationship with someone who beats her what are other men supposed to do? Murder him? Restrain her? Are these women saying to themselves "Well, I don't like abuse but since other men seem to sanction this abuse... I guess I would go out with Chris Brown" I want some stats on who listens to Chris Brown. Is his fan base mostly men?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:58 PM
6

Nancy Pelosi and Hilary Clinton would denounce you on national television.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:49 PM
1

So... what you're saying is that Sharon Osbourne is going to meet some guy who knows John Bobbitt? All those links and events to say just that?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:22 PM
2

I have yet to see anything that shows what MRM has done in regards to equality. We have tried, Our posters get ripped down. Feminists violently protest and block the doors at talks. Feminists fight to stop mens centers, or domestic violence shelters for men from being opened. Shit, people get doxxed and denounced as rape appologist for being involved here. I don't know about others but... I'm scared. I'm scared that speaking out about domestic violence or circumcision or male disposability could…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:16 PM
-1

It's satire
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:21 PM
17

WHY WILL I LIKE LASAGNA SO MUCH!?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:56 PM
5

how'd it go?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:01 AM
2

"where have all the good men gone?" would explode.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:17 PM
5

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that Walt is a real son of a bitch who does some pretty crazy stuff. I don't have an example to work from but is it possible that audiences wouldn't accept a morally grey female lead? or is that what we're talking about right now? I don't know I've never seen this show.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:30 PM
9

The system that kept women at home while men went off to war was the same system... So far so good... barefoot and pregnant... k...bit harsh... prevented from having important jobs or roles in society... More of an upper class thing... essentially the property of their fathers and husbands Bit of an over simplification to become generals and kings, to be remembered by history, to become masters of their fate. and it goes totally of the rails...
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:08 PM
5

Well, that's true. Society does infantalize women and treat them as though they have no agency. Doesn't mean that the only thing going on. Society also acts as though only men do have agency and demonizes and blames them for all societies ills.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 03:53 PM
3

I always behave as though I am just now pondering these issues for the first time.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:15 PM
10

Let's not forget that in many places there are drop off centers where a woman can just leave a child no questions asked. Or she could just pick up the phone any day and call child services to come take the kid off her hands.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:58 PM
1

Double think. The article says it's a "common-sense bylaw that would disallow boys from playing on girls teams." "common-sense". As in: it's obvious that they shouldn't play together Then we are also told that women "Can do anything a man can do, can do it better, and can do it in heels" We have to believe both of these things at once.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:39 PM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't accusations of sexism hurled at those games?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:03 PM
8

This is bullshit. Get this shit out of r/mensrights. This is straight up misogyny. I've RES tagged kickintheheart as "Bad kind of MRA"
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:34 AM
3

And obviously, with incarceration rates, it's men who need this reform more than women.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:24 PM
2

WE ARE. Our arguments make sense...
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:47 AM
2

I've reconciled myself to the downvote brigades. There is literally... nothing we can do to stop them. People downvote bullshit. And we are a movement against bullshit. Not only that, but these brigades are great publicity for men's rights. People reading these threads get to see all the typical feminist arguments get picked apart and exposed. granted, this wasn't the best debate ever... Bottom line, we have to be there when someone misrepresents the MRM. We have to be there to provide backup so…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:45 AM
2

I get the point. I also get the joke.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:55 PM
1

I'll admit the game industry is in a gender feedback loop. I think all of it comes from the same social forces that limit the amount of women in STEM. Men make games because they're the ones who work in computing. Boys play them because for whatever reason boys gravitated towards Nintendo and girls didn't. So the market gears to boys. Boys grow up to make video games for other boys. Eventually it's a multimillion dollar industry with a solid safe demographic.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:31 AM
1

yup, they banned me.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:37 AM
2

good to know
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:08 PM
7

I'm not signing it because this isn't something I actually see as a problem. This is all reactionary reaction...riffic. Meaning, it's being done solely as a reaction to the post from earlier today. As opposed to being done because we actually think that certain people should be banned from youtube.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:32 PM
0

hah
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:27 PM
3

This was my comment over there: Social Change: First it mocked, then it is aggressively opposed, then it is accepted as obvious fact. I see we've reached stage 2 P.S. 40 signatures in 5 days.... /r/mensrights has gained more users than that in the last 5 days. This petition, the online postings of the psycho who made it, and it's ridiculous content is probably interesting more people in the MRM by the minute. Keep it up guys. Things like this really help.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:47 PM
6

he looks like he has two eyes that have two pupils each.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:28 PM
3

percent of students who graduate?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:12 PM
144

Typical nut bag feminist. You think she ever would have described her ideal man as "works on cars, drinks whiskey straight, rides a motor cycle, slaps himself if he starts to show emotion over his fathers death."? NEVER. But that's the type of guy she goes out with, gets engaged to, and begs to stay with her.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:06 PM
2

In the 90s there were some protests in Ontario about the topless issue. So a law was passed. Women can go topless. It. never. happens. The protesters put their shirts back on forever.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:42 PM
1

In a discussion about the very act of taking offense itself I think it's perfectly reasonable to draw a distinction between people actually taking offense and people who are just injustice collectors.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:44 AM
2

I would say that's a different thing from being actually offended. Pseudo-offended.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:07 PM
1

because "feminism" is more about belief in the patriarchy as the cause of all problems than about wanting equal rights for women. So if you want equal rights for women but don't believe that inequality is caused by the patriarchy you aren't a feminist.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:43 PM
5

A large part of the appeal of feminism is in how it absolves women of white guilt. Women can take themselves out of the "white oppressor" role and step into the "Also a victim" role. They become victims of white men just like everyone else. If this is the subconscious appeal of Feminism why would you then use it to drive a wedge between you and your new found compatriots?
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:20 PM
13

What about trying to be G.I. Joe. Or He-Man. We call the fucking thing HE. MAN. This muscle bound warrior prince. Is so manly his name is He-Man. What message does that send to our kids?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:47 AM
6

I hate the whole "gaming" gender issue.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:23 PM
5

It's called a cost benefit analysis. I, a male, also have a great idea for a game. But I also don't want to spend a decade learning how to make it. I don't throw up my arms and scream "I DESERVE THIS GAME!!!" You get what you pay for. If the price is too high don't pay it.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:16 PM
2

they just learned about it in grade 12 english last week
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:54 PM
2

uh... trigger warning...
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:01 PM
3

Welcome
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:13 AM
1

Man you are all over this board. No one agrees with you. You should take so time to think about all the stupid shit you're saying. Because it's stupid. And a bit bigoted.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:57 AM
3

"Masculine" = Rough tough disposable soldier. A society full of masculine men = Strong, safe. A society full of effeminate men = conquer fodder. Thus society shames men into being masculine.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:52 AM
3

Warren Farrel makes a lot of sense
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:45 AM
5

Not "okay" not "just as good" ... "better". These kids are BETTER than kids raised with both parents! They're an improvement!
/r/MensRights04/01/13 03:09 AM
1

I would like to agree with you but I would say that what you're describing is, to me, "date rape" not straight up rape. I say this because I can't help but feel there is a difference between being grabbed, held down, and penetrated, versus being coerced into doing something you really regret the next day. I also however feel that I would reserve the category "date rape" for socially reprehensible but not illegal acts. Taking advantage of someone substantially more drunk than you should be the ki…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:41 PM
3

due to the patriarchy That's what blows it. You might as well say "due to da alienz" Do we believe that society has adopted gender norms that hurt the described genders? yes. do we believe this adoption was undertaken by men, for men at the expense of women? NO. The patriarchy is bullshit. Women have accepted, and expect men to adhere to, male gender roles just as much as men have. And who's fighting against them? Not women. nope. they seem to want men to stay in their role. Feminists included. …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:51 PM
1

Yes, telling the truth is okay.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:43 PM
2

Egyptian Society was Matriarchal. Does that mean there is an ancient international matriarchal complex?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:42 PM
4

It is not because girls will think you're not masculine enough for them What? Women constantly reject men for not being manly enough for them. You have to be lying to yourself to not see how the need to be a "real man" in the eyes of women drives male behavior. Does "the patriarchy" "program" these women?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:40 PM
1

It should say "More women having sex than men" not "women having more sex than men"
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:52 PM
15

women somehow disenfranchised themselves from the crime our white ancestors committed against humanity. Now it's the white man's fault because not only were we enslaving blacks but we were also forcing white women to bear our children, cook, and clean for us. May be a great unspoken strength of patriarchy theory. It ultimately frees women from any responsibility to history. They were just there...
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:37 AM
2

This is just some random idiot.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:28 AM
2

As a vegetarian: you are wasting perfectly good rape fodder.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:58 AM
3

TIL Alimony and child support are forms of abuse in the form of "allowance" The only way to true equality would be for men to simply yield absolute control of their finances to their ex wives.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:40 PM
1

Just check his response
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:15 AM
3

So... you think that women shouldn't have the vote. Bravo for an arguably flawed argument to back up your opinions. But you can't say "no" when I say you think women shouldn't have the vote.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:14 AM
3

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that "extreme MRAs" don't even really exist. At least not to the extent that they are "the most vocal" or "loudest". I'm saying that the bullshit people make up to make us sound extreme is the loudest. Maybe there are extreme MRAs out there, I'm sure there are somewhere, but I never even hear a peep out of them.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:23 PM
0

what kinds boobs we talking here? Like big boobs? C'man I need details on da boobz!!
/r/MensRights12/12/12 04:32 AM
20

Sorry, I keep hearing that extreme MRAs are "the most vocal". Aside from, like, two people that occasionally say things I don't really agree with on here, where are they? Is there some super popular blog somewhere? Are there "get back in the kitchen" groups making tons of noise? Or any noise? Do they exist at all? People say the MRA has these awful beliefs but they said that about Warren Farrell as well. Is it that "the worst elements of the MRA are the loudest"? Or do people just make up blatan…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 04:19 AM
1

Seriously, the topic sounds interesting.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:45 AM
-6

He also thinks women shouldn't have the vote... EDIT: why the downvotes? he confirms this right below...
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:04 AM
1

Not really, no.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:14 AM
1

Who cares about them? They're digging their own grave.... People who listen to SRS are crazy, anyone with an open mind can see how reasonable this place is... When you look at how much they scramble to make secret subreddits it's obvious who has to hide. Them.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:10 AM
11

Other people have handled most questions rather well so I'll just jump to what the biggest problem is: Male Disposablity. Men are seen as fodder in every element. A man who sacrifices himself to save a woman is a hero. A man who doesn't is a loser. This paradigm carries through into every sphere of life.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:02 AM
1

Next time just tell her she's sexist against women.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:01 AM
1

I always act as though I know nothing about mensrights and am just now, on the spot, having these ideas. Yeah.... kinda weird.... we circumcise boys.... hmmmm. that is kinda strange...
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:25 AM
5

not really.... Catholics don't come out to try to stop people from bombing abortion clinics. Because deep down they support them and their actions. They're glad someone is taking the crazy fanatical stand they are too afraid to take. When feminists start coming out to tell these lunatics to shut the fuck up and go home then I'll believe that they don't secretly support them. Even if a feminist organization released a statement saying "we think that whole protest was bullshit" but they don't...
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:13 PM
3

no, because there's no such thing as woman on man rape. So they could still rape drunk guys and sue them for child support.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 12:57 PM
5

Could have been done with a bit more tact though. The whole tone is the problem. The subtext is that little boys are gross, stupid, half apes. I can't imagine how badly this impacts the self esteem of all the boys in that school. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some teasing from the girls about this.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:36 AM
1

What you have to do is hit it on an angle. I go way off to the side and hit the curve. The stream just goes right around like a race car and down into the hole. Boom!
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:26 AM
1

or become Swedish...
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:10 AM
1

Maybe true, but laid by who? Can an ugly, out of shape, 45 year old easily get laid by an attractive young man?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:09 AM
6

if he's in Ontario his class will most likely be over by Christmas.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 02:38 PM
1

This say so much. This woman is super hot. She has the body of Sofia Vergara but somehow every woman agrees that modern society would consider her fat. And the blame for this zeitgeist lays on men of course. Why? Because women have no control over the fashion industry or the images that are plastered throughout women's magazines. It's men who control that stuff, not women. So women reject this body type and try to diet their ass out of existence and get thin enough to count their ribs so they're…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 10:00 PM
2

Exactly, you are bound to raise the child. This would just allow you to opt out of that.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:51 PM
1

That's hanging out with idiots for ya.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:38 PM
14

I think it would be simple enough to say that, just as the woman must, the man has to decide by a certain point what he wants. He can't just decide, when the kid's 15, that he doesn't want to be a dad anymore.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:15 PM
1

The bottom line is, if you need to have genders plugged into the equation to determine if it's rape or not (e.g. drunk man, sober woman = not rape. drunk woman, sober man = rape) then you are sexist. If you don't apply your standards equally across genders, you are sexist.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:38 PM
2

What podcast?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:43 PM
1

That's the whole point. We shouldn't use a term that can mean what we want to say. We should use the real term.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:19 PM
0

She's a stupid idiot. Don't even argue with her. Just smile and say roll your eyes and say "well.... " and shrug. preaching to the devil is just as useless as preaching to the choir. Try and reach the moderate reasonable people. Imagine being the type of feminist who we often see here that comes to agree with our perspective looking back at the type of arguments this girl is spewing. Right now you're marching into the battle alone. Build an army first.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:38 PM
5

That is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:48 PM
1

I thought that was feminist thought. A woman can work... or not... she has choices. Where's the dissonance?
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:15 PM
2

Who cares? As long as it doesn't say: "How to prevent Assault: Men, stop assaulting people."
/r/MensRights13/09/12 12:06 PM
6

Oh well, this is going nowhere, let's just abandon the whole thing.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:38 PM
12

reloading apparently lets you vote again. We're 40,000 strong
/r/MensRights11/09/12 09:06 PM
12

I'm not sure what an MRAs recourse could possibly be rewrite the definition and vote it up?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:06 PM
13

I believe there is a new wave of feminism coming that will see our perspective and be willing to work with us. Hell, we obviously need feminists to stick up for us in the general media since everyone seems to think we're the rising of the fourth reich or something.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 07:47 PM
1

I prefer (weird to say that) acid in the face. Because it a) actually happens and is reasonably despised. and b) it is usually motivated by the same type of jealous anger.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:07 AM
1

On Feminism: those people who harassed her and attacked her dog are deranged. However, I do not think it is exactly representative of feminism. On mensrights: Honestly, I frequently see you all as a bunch of hatemongers and I really wish this was not so. sorry, but you should apply your more forgiving nature universally.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 05:13 AM
1

See, feminists fight against anything MRAs do, so we fight back. It's their loss if they don't even take the time to realize that we support their core causes. Of course we disagree with feminists trying to shut down mens centers or male domestic violence shelters, while they simultaneously fight for laws that paint all men as the perpetrators of domestic violence or as rapists. We just want equality. Feminists say they do. Guess they're lucky we're here to fight for it. Since a lot of them have…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 05:04 AM
1

That proves nothing. Men are shoved into rigid gender roles where crying is considered a sign of weakness. Hardly proof of some sweeping trend in society. I could just as easily say "society values empathy/emotions/etc. because its okay for women to cry in public."
/r/MensRights01/09/12 04:56 AM
1

You're just begging the question.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 04:52 AM
1

yes, this is exactly the stereotype being described. How is it more the man's fault if a woman gets "knocked up"? Isn't she just as responsible for birth control? Isn't she just as aware of the possibility of pregnancy? As for ditching her, how can you possibly presume this? You're talking about a completely abstract scenario and you just assume that any man who isn't in a relationship with their baby mama must have "ditched" them.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 10:44 PM
1

jesus, people think before you downvote. This is a joke.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:59 AM
-1

in a few centuries we'd find them disgusting
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:01 AM
2

Are you making the argument that men suffer more [then women] when they fail to meet the expectations set for them by their gender? What the hell are you talking about? This isn't a pissing contest. How could they possibly be making that argument? That isn't even the topic. They never even mentioned women. Why do we even need to establish which gender suffers more? We're talking about how the issue affects men. Caring about males doesn't discount the possibility of caring about women. Are you ju…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:53 PM
3

yeah, and there's nothing wrong with not wanting to be shoved. I don't want to be shoved. My manliness shouldn't be called into question because of that
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:38 PM
1

This isn't at all about hating or mistrusting women. The first example is about male victims of molestation and domestic violence needing help. The second illustrates why we should accept that men can be raped, or at least that the paradigm of our society puts men in a position where there sexuality is restricted to a certain role (e.g. fuck everything that moves or you're a homo) The third is about parental rights. Or more specifically the right not to be a parent. And the fourth about false ra…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:48 PM
1

sorry, no, it's netflix so you have to pay the $8/month. other than that it'll probably be on youtube eventually.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:36 PM
25

My uncle was molested by two women when he was young. (One of them molested my father as well.) His family used to joke that he lost his virginity to the babysitter. His wife beat him for years until he fell down a flight of stairs and died. There was nowhere for him to go and get help. When I've mentioned to people that there should be shelters for men some people have reacted with absolute fury. I have no idea why. I was consistently date raped by a girl while I was in high school. I used to f…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:20 PM
1

netflix canada has it
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:06 PM
0

I was disappointed when he told the "hilarious" story of his girlfriend punching him. He never even hinted that it was inherently wrong for a woman to hit a man. Instead he framed it as something that was funny.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:06 PM
1

We constantly ask why feminists don't call out their worst elements.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:17 PM
12

yet when feminists don't decry their worst elements we shit all over them.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:17 PM
-5

We link to comments we don't like all the time. Why not link to people being assholes here? I'll start: Someone calling a girl a whore and other things for being offended by their post I really hate that there are people who use this subreddit to spew hate. I try to defend the MRM as a logical reasoned social movement and these people ruin it. Then they call you all sorts of bullshit for not being as angry and venomous as they are.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:07 PM
3

I don't even know what that means. Honest to god it makes no sense to me. You're just being really venomous and it's a bit much. Calling someone a slut and a whore for not liking your post is disgusting. You shame mensrights by acting like that. You look just as bad as the worst crazies on any feminist board.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:11 AM
4

jesus man... You're a whore. Really? you hurt this community. I second the fuck you.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:30 AM
1

just a lot of whinging
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:28 AM
0

well put.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:27 AM
1

it is indeed.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:48 AM
6

A dude wrote that from his own perspective. Then he sold it to a girl. Changed some words. $$$
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:15 AM
3

How dare you want to have sex with me! It's just you and you hand tonight!.. what? Oh you actually met someone just after me? And now you're happy together? I'm so alone....
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:13 AM
2

encouraging people to vote is "gaming the system"? am I missing something?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:08 AM
0

Society needs babies. Having a baby shouldn't cripple you financially. Everyone should get maternity leave. Men, women, and, yes people who don't even have babies. My sister is 35 years old. Recently married and just moved back to her our home country after years working abroad. She has the money to support herself if she ad a baby. but she doesn't want one. She wants a job. Do you think any employer believes she doesn't want a baby? Nope. Everyone should get a lump sum either when they have a b…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:03 PM
5

Men want their partners to look like Sarah Jessica Parker. WHAT!?!? Yeah, men love SJP. Her and Audrey Hepburn. /sarcasm What the hell? That is just untrue. We don't even think about her. ever. When a woman says "she's so pretty" it is one of the times I just shake my head and think "what the hell is going on in their brains?". SJP is only interesting to women. Women who think that is what men want must really be confused as to why they can't find a man. "But, I'm trying to be what they want" ha…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:04 PM
14

No, you're talking about men (everybody with a penis). They're talking about Men (the ones that are worth dating - e.g. have money and are attractive enough)
/r/MensRights23/07/12 12:58 PM
-1

are you Canadian or do you somehow know I am? EDIT: why is this being downvoted?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:51 PM
-1

well.... that's anecdotal evidence for you.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:29 PM
50

You can't force someone to carry a pregnancy to term. She could die giving birth or suffer other consequences. I can't imagine the terror of being forced to push a baby through my vagina (if I had one). That would be an awful world.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:15 PM
1

I must have missed the massive backlash from the rest of feminism. Oh... no they don't care.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:13 PM
1

up vote for great pun. Also I agree.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:06 PM
1

his body, his choice
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:05 PM
0

We learned about Amelia Earhart every year in school. She's the quintessential example of this. What did she do? she crashed and disappeared. Charles Lindbergh? Who's that? What did he do? Huh? Never heard of him. I can't help but think of this article I read a few weeks ago. If the genders had been reversed and a woman had come up with a solution to a problem that had plagued men forever it would be absolutely crammed down our throats how this is an example of how amazing, smart, creative, impo…
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:05 PM
1

good.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:32 AM
2

I'm just pointing out that you said essentially the same thing in many more words.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 11:44 PM
6

yeah... potential future resources. money.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 10:37 PM
10

they don't even register nice guys as men. They classify them as some bizarre third sex.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 10:36 PM
-3

Unless you're a woman looking for a parking spot....
/r/MensRights10/07/12 10:10 PM
10

YOU AREN"T UGLY. this isn't some "we're all beautiful on the inside" bullshit. This is straight up. There are people who would kill for your looks. You aren't even fat for fuck sakes!! You're NOT UGLY. Get over yourself. I would slap you and drag you out to see some real ugly mother fuckers if I could. all in your head buddy.
/r/seduction07/07/12 08:46 AM
1

Tom Cruise should have had his kid taken away as soon as it was born. This is exactly what we hate about feminism. When they back any woman no matter what. I won't defend Tom fucking nutbag Cruise for a second just because he has a dick.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:08 AM
10

his body, his choice
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:01 AM
4

I kinda think this is a case where she should get alimony. She, kinda, had here whole life turned upside down for that marriage. I can only imagine what kind of shit she's been through. Even if she got 250 mil it would probably only start to cover the cost of disappearing forever. This isn't a "she deserves money for having a vagina" thing. This is a "Scientology is fucked" kinda thing
/r/MensRights04/07/12 08:37 PM
3

yes
/r/MensRights04/07/12 08:40 AM
3

What an ass he is
/r/MensRights03/07/12 02:43 PM
12

and makes and ass of himself in the process
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:54 PM
1

that thread is full of that
/r/MensRights01/07/12 01:32 PM
1

marriage was a form of slavery for women. It's absurd to suggest it was a way of binding men to the women they are sexually active with in order to assure they would provide for their spouse and children. It's absurd to imply that anywhere any men feel compassion for women or care for them. EVERYTHING WAS ALWAYS MALICIOUS.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 01:32 PM
-3

um... source? Well, I guess you can't source vague non points.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 12:38 PM
1

Jeez... this isn't as fun as I thought it would be when I insisted on not getting an abortion or giving the child up for adoption. It's, like, really hard and I never get to go out any more. Fuck it, maybe I can just stick it in a dumpster somewhere...
/r/MensRights01/07/12 12:35 PM
1

So an alpha wolf kills his pack?
/r/seduction27/06/12 04:02 PM
1

Or when you're reading a magazine and think "hmm... I'll check the comment section... oh"
/r/MensRights25/06/12 09:05 PM
2

There's just too much to shock over
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:55 PM
1

I only asked if you felt women are taking your rights away. Apparently, yes. Where did you even get that from? Why did you feel the need to ask that question? I fail to see how your original "issue" (women being mentioned on /r/mensrights would imply that this problem exists. That's why I think you have a prepackaged opinion. Even now you seem eager to prove that point. The real point you're trying to make. Not a prepackaged opinion because questions aren't opinions. Don't be coy. The subreddit …
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:53 AM
5

We don't "really feel that women are taking [our] rights away" Strange you had that pre packaged opinion. We discuss gender issues. There are two genders. We mention them both. I find it odd that women, apparently (if your little stat is at all revealing) don't ever talk about men. Don't you? Why don't you just ask what you really want to ask?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:13 PM
1

Went to French party this weekend. unmarried 25 year old woman had to wear a silly hat. I think its teasing among friends not shaming.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:27 PM
4

Sexiness is one thing. Being used as a piece of furniture is not.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:13 PM
1

I'm really not sure who the target audience is for this movie Sarah Polly directed it so... people who like high brow cinema. But the casting of Seth Rogan is a good stroke. She gets a moderately famous name attached to her picture and he gets a chance to show off his "acting talents".
/r/MensRights18/06/12 08:29 PM
1

Maybe they don't even have sex. We don't even see them kiss. We see them clothed in a bed. So maybe at least once. but really it's not like it's cheatingwives.com with better directing.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 08:25 PM
4

This subreddit is a good example. Except for the fact that people can just show up here and troll us. We generally can talk freely here. I can say that I think circumcision isn't something we should be doing when I'm in this subreddit. I can't say it at a dinner party. I don't know that I really need a place with no dissenting opinions though.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 08:08 PM
2

interesting point about the questioning of female patients.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 07:47 PM
3

Everyone knows that. But when [Islamic religious group] wanted permission to perform a ceremonial "nick" on the labia they were turned down flat. That seems to me like it would rank higher on the acceptability scale than removal of the foreskin. The point is that the two are the same in the ways the OP described. They can be that same and different.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:51 AM
1

the MRM is often accused by feminists of being composed of "privileged white men and of only concerning itself with their needs. Here we have an example of a feminist group that suffers that exact issue. But it isn't causing feminists to abandon their cause. It provided MRAs with a great counter argument to that accusation.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 02:42 PM
3

"how come my girlfriend left me for that asshole? He's not even interested in her emotionally"
/r/MensRights02/06/12 02:33 PM
6

Congratulations feminists. It took a mensrights movement to start combating the bigotry in your own movement. Why do we have to do this? You would earn a lot more credibility if you did it yourselves.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 02:24 PM
2

You can't say someone is "nude" when, for all you know, they could be covered from breast to toe.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 04:43 PM
1

great show.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 04:38 PM
2

That's it right there. Are going to try to say that women being "underrepresented in business and politics" and there still being a "bias towards men in traditional social studies" really justifies feminists coming over to /r/mensrights and declaring all issues invalid? Men are over represented in the homeless! That should be a trump card. We cut off parts of our male children's penises! And feminists tell us that this is not a problem that needs addressing because women's issues are more import…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:43 PM
4

groan
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:32 PM
1

well, since masculinity is inherently homophobic I can see how it's a bad thing. Jesus /s
/r/MensRights22/05/12 12:44 PM
1

Is the default parental block also on for any site that has swearing and adult content? Like, blogs or humor sites?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:55 AM
3

okay, fair enough. I hope you understand we get a lot of trolls. as far as the intro goes, I can only say that personally I would implore you to consider mens rights as more than /r/mensrights. I read articles here but I don't consider this sub reddit to be the international head quarters of a movement. Mens rights isn't an "ism" It's just a bunch of issues that are related by the fact that they are ignored. I don't even know if kloo2you (the writer of that intro) is still around here (I think t…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:18 PM
4

So you're a feminist and you found /mensrights to be paranoid, offensive, misogynist Kinda disingenuous to exclude the question mark in your quote. It was a question. If the answer to the question is "Yes" then you are directed to an FAQ. distrust and the anger they rightfully feel after being bashed as the dirty, nasty, unkempt, stupid, perverted, perpetually horny, embarrassing half of the human race Wait, so you just think the entire world is constantly hating on you? Like... EVERYONE? Always…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:32 PM
9

Feminist =/= Woman. Feminists can be men.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:17 PM
2

Came here because of that quote. What is "extra-hard"? Compared to what? Yourself? your co-workers? How could I ever know that I had to work harder than someone else to get the same recognition? They don't look flustered? they got their work done quicker? How would I ever know if I'm not working extra-hard to make up for being shit at my job? And what exactly do they think men are doing? Not working hard and still getting ahead? All men are getting ahead equally regardless of hard work. Or is it…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 12:50 PM
0

Well, just running with an idea here but, if we had "A" level try outs and they were open to anyone 6 - 18 but "A" level only took the best. I doubt we'de really have to worry about too many 6 year olds coming out to tryouts. Of course if 6 year olds were the only ones to come out in district X and it was all 18 year olds in district Y...
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:37 AM
0

they have a hard time wrapping their head around that since everything is really for women. Why did men build civilization? for women.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:01 PM
2

that's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:59 PM
7

This needs to be exposed.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 12:08 PM
2

when is "now"
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:42 AM
1

sounds to me like your trying to define what a man should be and force them to be that. Not really "allowing" men to do much more then you say.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 05:32 PM
2

so women have the intellectual ability of a scared child? That's pretty sexist
/r/MensRights13/05/12 04:52 PM
1

Hi... I support mensrights.... what do you support?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:25 PM
1

Or the tragedy women face. "the park used to be a safe space"
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:21 PM
1

what benefit does competition among sperm have to the child? Do we have any evidence that the best made sperm contains the best DNA for humans?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:17 PM
1

I think it's rough numbers for now.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:00 AM
1

Call the media and get your story published. We'll promote it. If you were both drunk and it happened how you say this is crazy unjust.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 09:29 PM
6

you know he turned out to be gay and left her when he got his citizenship? Crazy eh?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:37 PM
4

No, no, you have all the power. The CEO of Diebold is a man. Barack Obama is a man. The richest person in the world is a man. So any problems that you face, no matter how much of a negative affect it has it can't be worse than women... not being rich and powerful...
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:56 AM
1

Happens all the time
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:25 AM
2

yeah... that's still good with my rule. Unless a sober person convinced the drunk person to do it.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:23 AM
1

right... but its rape jokes that trivialize rape....
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:22 AM
-1

I guess it was tongue in cheek?
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:41 PM
-5

they pay more for haircuts....
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:23 PM
4

no.....
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:22 PM
9

I just want a consistent rule. Something like this: A drunken individual is responsible for their own actions, assuming that these actions are not performed in unison with another sober individual and said individual is aware of their drunken state. In such case the sober individual shall be held accountable unless coerced by force. Any group of drunken individuals (2+) are responsible for their own actions unless coerced by force. There. Two drunk people sleep together - what can you do? people…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:20 PM
60

looks don't matter - when you got fuckin' stockholm syndrome
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:08 PM
3

To be honest. Did any of us care about the story? Is that why we posted it? No, we were interested in 2 things. How average people react. Its always interesting to see what the general social temperature is regarding men. How the suspect will be treated in court. The story was fake, so we only get point 1.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:07 PM
3

I honest to god hope that as time goes on and all our issues come to be seen as common sense we won't need to exist. I'm sure that the next wave of feminism will come up aware of our issues and of how hypocritical feminism looks ignoring and belittling them. They'll acknowledge that feminist issues like rape, the wage gap, and restrictive social roles can never truly be addressed with out looking at the male aspects of those issues from a perspective that's empathizes with men rather than demoni…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:31 PM
7

you make us look bad
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:51 AM
0

It's like a lynching to you if you know you would never ever ever get lynched
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:27 AM
6

Answer: Because they're losers. Stop being losers men!
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:30 PM
1

In what country and why would it be "parent" to us?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:15 PM
1

Yeah... shut up
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:05 PM
2

Yes–the only black ponies in the TV show My Little Pony are slave ponies to the white pony overlord! How can we expect kids to grow up rejecting racism when they watch shows like this? Like kids are gunna grow up and think slavery is good? What would have to take place in society for that to happen?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:15 PM
1

I hope you understand that my concern comes from not wanting men's rights to appear misogynistic. I completely understand your point of view. Actually, I share it. But anyone who's spent any time here knows that people are just looking for anything to take out of context. A lot of our critics simply lack the unprejudiced view of mensrights to understand the arguments being made. That's why I think that, lacking a less controversial way to address the issue, we should avoid taking it up as a men'…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:12 PM
1

Lame
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:29 PM
2

To me the biggest issue is that - no matter how big the issue is, if ie affects men primarily, it isn't "important" Male victims of DV? They do not matter Men committing suicide at 4:1? Does not matter. It's more important that women attempt suicide in the majority. Now, that's an issue that matters. Male genital mutilation? Not an issue. Laughably dismissible. Homelessness, college and university enrollment, drop out and graduation rates, incarceration rates, child custody states, unemployment,…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:26 PM
0

Fine make an issue out of it. Good luck in the arguments it causes. It will be pretty hard trying to convey that mensrights isn't misogynist when we go to other message boards and argue for the right to comment on womens looks. I agree with the legitimate issue of "we demand that male sexuality not be seen as somehow dirtier than or inferior to female sexuality." But I don't think this it the arena to fight it in. You'd do better to wait until some women are commenting on a mans looks for no rea…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:06 PM
1

is there any evidence of a disadvantage? What percentage of women want to own businesses?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:05 PM
0

Fine make an issue out of it. Good luck in the arguments it causes. It will be pretty hard trying to convey that mensrights isn't misogynist when we go to other message boards and argue for the right to comment on womens looks. I agree with the legitimate issue of "we demand that male sexuality not be seen as somehow dirtier than or inferior to female sexuality." But I don't think this it the arena to fight it in. You'd do better to wait until some women are commenting on a mans looks for no rea…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:02 PM
1

Sounds like you were winning
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:48 AM
-1

Yeah but seriously is this a mens rights issue? Am I wrong? is this something we stand for? The right to say sexual stuff to women? That's not what mens rights is for me.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:39 PM
-1

I don't think being told that it's not always appropriate to comment on someones looks is arguable. I certainly wouldn't add it to the list of Mens rights issues. "We demand to be allowed to tell a girl she's hot". Whatever. I kinda think it's bizarre that you linked it here. I know it aligns with the whole "Assuming men are perverted rapists" thing but I don't think it's an issue. It's not like the world will suffer due to lack of "tits or gtfo" comments. It's pretty easy: just keep it to yours…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:36 PM
6

I think it's pretty clear that they're against defacing public property not the message of the sticker.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:09 PM
1

yeah, well here's one of the issues: the majority of people who try to commit suicide and don't succeed are women, except that men succeed at a rate of 4 to 1.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:06 PM
2

I'm not really approaching this as a mens rights issue. just a thought experiment. I'm not saying we need to do something about this horrible imbalance in small business grants. That's what I meant with those questions why do women need extra help to start a business? They can't do it with the same resources as a man? I'm wondering why we think it's okay to believe that. That women need special help.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 05:45 PM
1

what did you do about it?
/r/MensRights06/05/12 03:50 PM
3

Add: Circumcised at birth. No father in the home. Put on ritalin while in school. psycho GF got pregnant decided to keep it. Might not be his kid. They break up and he has to pay child support. Can't afford to go to school and follow his dream. Gets shitty back breaking labor job instead. New GF beats him. Depression, drug abuse. No help. Put in jail for DV eventually. Loses job, cant pay child support. Now he's a dead beat dad with a criminal record and a GF that beats him. eventual suicide.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 03:48 PM
3

But why do women need extra help to start a business? They can't do it with the same resources as a man? It's this kind of attitude, that women are equal but not equal, That they're victims of being women in and of itself, that annoys me. We're not allowing women to exercise their inherent equal strengths we're assuming that they need help to be equal at all. I would love to see statistic relating to how many women want to start a small business but feel that simply being a woman is making it di…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 03:37 PM
1

they aren't there. Sold out?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 08:05 PM
1

PUT THEM ON RITALIN
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:38 PM
13

I'd say it's pretty positive relatively. It didn't use the term Menz once, it didn't ultimately conclude that Mensrights is total bullshit, and it never even implied that we want to legalize rape. I think at this point you almost have to be a bit "I don't know, is it valid, maybe maybe not." since most people haven't even heard of mensrights.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:34 PM
1

That already happens. You also benefit from toher peoples money.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:17 PM
2

Before we go down this rabbit hole we should consider that, if any man could get a paternity test whenever he was "accused" of being the father we wouldn't have to worry about false "accusations". Putting men in this box gives this woman the opportunity to falsely "accuse". We don't have to punish her to get justice. We just have to give justice to the men.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:10 PM
2

mensrights was progressive... before the progressives knew.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:43 PM
1

She should keep up with facts. Then she could better manipulate them to suit her needs.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:41 PM
1

Don't forget that nowhere in this dialogue is the idea that men may prefer to be the ones staying home even mentioned. No, women are victims of men forcing them to stay home with kids.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:39 PM
7

On the one hand, what you say about this "invasion" feeling may be true. On the other, There are quite a few instance of people posting outright bullshit. Along the lines of: "if you love rape then head over to /r/mensrights cause they wanna legalize it" (a slight exaggeration). We cannot allow this. The great thing about the internet is that you can be loud without shouting. If we "invade" we do it with civility. But when someone spreads lies about us we'll give them solid facts. We'll go point…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:35 AM
9

first it will be ignored then violently opposed then it will be accepted as obvious fact You're right. It's such a pathetic flailing display. Making up obvious bullshit and going around to other subreddits to spread it. Coming here and saying misogynist shit so they have a reason to accuse us of being misogynist. Didn't somebody have Mensrights declared a hate group somewhere? The media will cover Mensrights. People will look into it, see how reasonable it is. And fa la la la la la la.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:07 AM
3

Hey man. Lets not start a troll hunt. We can't let paranoia rip us apart. even though any one one of us could be a troll... any one...
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:58 AM
3

I have to ask if people are being banned now. As in, do people get banned from time to time? If people get banned how would anyone even know? We're basically talking about banning for show here right? So what's the point if the trolls aren't going to sing it from the mountains? They pop in and spew a bunch of junk and we ban them. They get a message saying "you've been banned". So they make a new account. And everyone says "Look at the horrible things these people say" and nobody even knows that…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:56 AM
0

every new idea
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:53 AM
7

First it will be ignored Then violently opposed Then it will be accepted as obvious fact.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 03:38 PM
2

bring up helping men adapt to new gender roles. Like being a stay at home father. Emphasize that this will help women to achieve their goals. Don't argue with them. If they refuse to believe that men face problems or that you don't have malicious intentions just be polite and leave.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:54 AM
1

lets just chalk this one up to confusion.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 01:46 AM
1

okay, so right now we are posting in a subreddit. That subreddit, that we are in right now, is /r/mensrights. I originally responded to you posting a link to men's rights to point out that you don't need to post a link to men's rights because we are in mensrights. Nobody could see your link without already being in the men's rights subreddit. Imagine you were in France and someone said "You should visit France sometime" So you say: "This is France" like "This is /r/mensrights" Get it?
/r/MensRights27/04/12 11:59 AM
0

Because I meant this is. Not "this is:" I wasn't saying this is it at the other end of this link. I meant this is it here. Where we're posting right now. We're already there.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 02:49 AM
2

Here's my question: THE WHY DOES THE PAY GAP MATTER? If on an individual level couples are mutually deciding to forgo prioritizing making sure that they make the same amount. Deciding that for them, within their relationship, their mini society, equal pay is not important. If this trend is the cause of "the pay gap" then why do we feel we need to do something to correct it? This is a "child care gap". The "pay gap" is a symptom of it. These are just people making decisions. Decisions that they'r…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:55 PM
1

No they knew that. They don't include them in the group that is cared about.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:09 PM
1

I know what it is. We're here already. That's where this is posted. You don't have to post a link. We're already in that subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 06:53 PM
0

This is /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 12:37 PM
1

Translation? I'm not 100% up to date on everything that happens here.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:33 PM
62

Sorry. I didn't mean to discredit being a stay at home. I'm planning to be a stay at home father while my Spouse works. One time I was talking with a group of stay at home mothers who believed that it was a hard job. When I explained I planned to stay at home they suddenly switch gears. One of them even said "That would be nice. Sit at home and let your wife pay the bills"
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:33 PM
30

I chimed in on her admitting that she is aware that most men are not stupid but that writing an article that alludes to this would be boring. I pointed out that if she knew men weren't stupid she should have used a different title. She just said "brilliant argument."
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:05 PM
80

you wanna prove being a stay at home parent isn't the hardest job on earth? Tell a bunch of women that you plan to be one (if you're male). They'll accuse you of lazy mooching in a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:48 PM
139

She writes something hateful about men. People complain. She calls their complaints a form of woman hating? Seriously? Not accepting people hating on men is in itself a form of hate for women?
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:46 PM
1

okay, that makes sense
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:22 PM
1

I'd be uneasy thinking that she may not like my leisurely lifestyle. Lucky she'd lie about her job and we'd end up in a relationship. Then she would huff and puff about how annoyed she is by my leisurely lifestyle.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:23 PM
1

Okay so are you talking about people who have, say, male genitalia but they "act like a woman"? Or are you talking about someone born with functioning genitals from both sexes? Because to me gender is biological but how you behave is largly free from this (beyond the extent to which hormones affect our behaviour and to which hormones are affected by gender). Otherwise people are free to behave how they wish. The gender "role" should mean nothing beyond having those genitals.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:27 PM
1

Can we just reduce it to a word? Like "Bogendat"? Then you could just say: Women say thing that are bad. (Bogendat) Bogendat is a stupid word though.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:16 PM
1

"Girl Pushups" could be used as a metaphor for all instances where women yield to "inequality" because it suits them.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:05 PM
1

probably MRAs have swamped the comments.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 12:27 PM
1

or, like, all those jilted lovers that throw acid in their exes faces? Nobody finds that funny. Nobody sees the guys as heros standing up for themselves. Becuase their psychos.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 12:17 PM
2

I guess that makes sense. I was imagining the very secure change rooms at one of the stores I go to.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 01:57 PM
14

You think women should take precautions to protect themselves?... sounds like victim blaming to me... /s
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:09 AM
3

What do they even think you would be doing? Raping? looking? What can I achieve here at the change rooms that I can't anywhere else that it would be suspicious of me to be here?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 03:28 AM
7

Yes, use the victim card. Feels good doesn't it?
/r/MensRights16/02/12 01:31 PM
5

It may just be a part of being human. Wanting a best friend that you can be close with.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:46 AM
1

Wants to have conversations about local vs. organic. Sorry.... I just stumbled upon this article and had to earch to find if it had been discussed here. IT HAD!!!
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:58 AM
3

Okay so: You said: I could've done without this assumption though: If you are an average forum goer, who has learned from feminism because you took a couple of courses, or read some blogs, and self-identify, I don't consider you a feminist. I just consider you ignorant. This might piss you off, and it should. Never join a movement that you don't understand, whose leaders do things you wouldn't approve of, and about whose history you are ignorant. Meaning that you were put off by the assumption t…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 05:25 AM
1

You miss the shots you don't take. Period. you didn't take it because there was a possible better shot? You still missed it. Whether you make the second shot or not you still missed the first one. Because you didn't take it. If the first shot was hopeless then it wasn't really a real shot. We all know that the best strategy for any goal oriented sport isn't to just shoot for the net EVERY TIME ITS PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE. "A shot" is a chance to actually score" AND WAYNE GRETZKY IS CANADIAN!!!! EDIT…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 04:41 PM
2

The arguments were valid, you just refuse to acknowledge them.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 04:34 PM
3

An intentional action only defies nature if intention is unnatural by definition. An ant colony intends to build a hive, a beaver intends to make a dam, we intend to build societies. Are we defying nature or filling the role provided to us? If humanity was "reset" would we do the same over and over? Good topic. You could get a good thread outta this.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:12 PM
1

Ah, I just wanted to make sure you weren't saying "This person is a feminist, therefore they're wrong and we should hate them"
/r/MensRights09/01/12 01:05 PM
4

So?
/r/MensRights09/01/12 03:07 AM
1

Right, but as a movement we exist due to shared view points. If we expand our area of concern to any issue that has any effect then we have to literally choose a side on every issue from global warming to the economy.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 06:52 PM
2

very true. However it doesn't mean we have to, as a movement, have a stance on every issue on earth.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 06:09 PM
0

defend what?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 04:39 PM
2

yeah, what Hillary Clinton said was obviously horrible. Anyone will agree. But you'll never see dissent on the news, or protests, or politicians releasing statements condemning it. But if some nobody makes an off color joke about womens hockey players or whatever. Well, watch out.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 12:58 AM
3

It's just a dumb example
/r/MensRights30/11/11 11:22 PM
1

Exactly right. He Keeps it funny the whole time. "Caught me slippin'" perfectly captures the attitude that men have to take towards so many things in life. As if it doesn't really bother them. "Haha, whatever. I guess it was kinda my fault. I don't care." But Chappelle presents it in a way that makes you laugh at how really deeply ridiculous it really is. And that's what's so powerful about comedy. It can explain the state of the world more plainly than any news network. And all people have to d…
/r/MensRights19/11/11 12:52 AM
3

That was the part that made my brows furrow. Also perpetuating the myth that "Young men don't need much encouragement to have sex". Maybe they don't because since the day they were born they have been told that if they don't want to fuck every girl all the time they are an obviously gay wimp fag she homo beta queer. Some girls want to have sex others don't. Same with dudes. And sex education DOES NOT encourage kids of either gender to go out and have sex.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 12:02 AM
2

care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 10:09 PM
3

she did sue them later though.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 07:41 PM
3

More and more people are coming here and reading the posts and saying "Makes sense". Soon MRAs will start showing up on TV and in newspapers. First they'll be mostly mocked. I can see a diner party of people laughing. But one person will say "Yeah, but men are abused. My Uncle's wife beats him." or "Yeah, but how come so many little boys are on Ritalin?" or "Yeah, but stay at home dads are looked down on" or "Men kinda do get fucked over in divorces" etc. When the conversation is over we'll have…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 12:31 PM
20

Don't unsubscribe. Someday you'll look back and say "You used to get laughed out of the room for saying something like that. Now it's commons sense." This will be when your grand kids are in college
/r/MensRights20/10/11 02:45 AM
1

it's the husbands. The really pathetic ones will think "Ha... showed her... kinda" It's really the best they are allowed to hope for. This time when she emasculates and abuses me she'll feel embarrassed. No apology or anything. Just an unspoken "oh..."
/r/MensRights18/10/11 04:59 AM
5

Just chop their dicks off and be done with it.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:43 PM
28

Seriously? why the downvotes? This really happens to women when they piss off men. It's widely condemned. Sharon Osborne thinks a man getting his dick chopped off for wanting a divorce is funny. Why not a woman getting acid thrown in her face for rejecting a marriage proposal? I don't think people should do this, anymore than people should cut off dicks or tits. I just wonder why people don't think it's a fitting image. EDIT: I was at -6 when I posted this
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:09 PM
27

I this image is a more fitting parallel.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 11:59 AM
1

I get that, I personally don't mind if an adult male is the perpetrator of violence in some PSAs. I guess that since you've made your point about one instance I simply wanted to see if you thought it made any difference that it isn't the only instance. That it is, in fact, in every portrayal. I'm inviting you to look at the big picture despite the fact that we all came here to talk about a small piece of it.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:11 AM
3

I actually appreciate that song. Too often people miss the fact that the man and woman abuse each other in that song. It's not one way violence. I think that's more true to the nature of abusive relationships. These people use violence to communicate. They usually come from abusive families. And they often see non-violent people as "weak". This is their world and both of them need help. It really annoys me that people see the song as portraying male violence towards women. I mean, you have to be…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:01 AM
1

Oh, the song that was banned almost twenty years ago?
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:43 AM
2

Okay, so when can someone complain? They could run a thousand advertisements portraying men as abusers but since they aren't sexist individually it's never sexist? I get that the narrative of the piece is to portray an instance of child abuse. But there has never ever been a PSA that depicts women as abusers of children or adults, physical or sexual.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:28 AM
3

do you have a link? I never heard of that.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 05:47 PM
1

Don't sleep with him too early. A guy will have more time to get to know you and see you as a person this way. Rather then pursuing you more beyond sex and being forced to ask himself if he wants a relationship or not he will simply be pursuing you. A lot of simple stuff that flies around here can be used to build attraction. Look like you have things to do also. Don't be the girl that is just waiting around to see if he wants to be with you. Keep the pursuit going. But PUA stuff can only get yo…
/r/seduction06/09/11 04:45 AM
3

you're not making a very good case for yourself.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 03:08 AM
0

They're still perv rapists thought.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:17 PM
1

I'd like to see that list and the reverse.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:10 PM
2

It seemed clear to me that they were saying that judging an entire gender and basing your treatment of an entire gender on a historical context where the individual is eliminated and lumped in with everyone of their gender who has ever lived is a bit ridiculous and sexist. A man shouldn't be discriminated against because women weren't allowed to vote in the past. That doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 12:13 PM
1

it's a liiiiiiiitle bit condescending.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:56 PM
1

You're an idiot
/r/MensRights11/08/11 08:58 PM
4

You aren't as unique as you want to believe. Society has had an affect on you. You have been conditioned by it. You are a product of the culture that surrounds you. Just because you became an atheist when your parents weren't doesn't make you exempt. You wear clothes right? You work? You have friends who's opinions matter to you? you try and be polite? Say "please", "thank you", "hello", or "goodby"? eat what people call "meals"? occasionally do things that other people also do? Wonder if you're…
/r/MensRights11/08/11 05:11 AM
3

Wow. Sorry. I was reading an article earlier today to day that, I really thought, was called The real reason why the gender gap won't go away. Ever. There weren't many comments then so I came back, I thought, to read what people had written since then. Anyways. In the article it explains that the professions are grouped together really generally. So pediatricians are together with surgeons which are predominantly female and male respectively. Thus they say: medical doctors (or whatever group) su…
/r/MensRights11/08/11 04:49 AM
0

did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights11/08/11 03:53 AM
1

you are wrong. Dead wrong.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 03:47 AM
3

No, it's not discrimination because that's not what the word discrimination means. Is it bad? Sure. I will say that I think men are probably told that their value is tied to their ability to pull in an income, and that they can't be "pussies" more often and with more social acceptance than women are told that boys are just "naturally" better at math and science, and that they should focus on more "ladylike" pursuits, and focus on "looking pretty to get rich husbands" I think it's the social norm…
/r/MensRights11/08/11 03:39 AM
1

Of course. I think that men are stigmatized a great deal for not conforming to their gender role.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 03:28 AM
30

IGNORE. THAT. SUBREDDIT! DO YOU NOT GET THIS?!?! YOU MAY AS WELL ADVERTISE FOR THEM
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:49 AM
11

Feminists will only quote that first part
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:31 AM
3

From the Comments: Oh, yes! I've seen it before, but it is still funny. My dh often wonders how I spend my time (although he is suspecting blogging more and more...) because when he takes over for a few days, he has time for a project or two PLUS what he considers to be my usual responsibilities. However, he is not attending meetings, volunteering, shopping, or trying to keep up with friends. Moreover, he is not attempting to do all of this with 60 extra pounds on his frame. But I've discovered …
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:03 PM
1

It's an arms race. The bar goes up or down depending on where you are. Women and men in a rural areas will both put less effort into their personal appearance. The competition goes up in and urban area. And even more if you go somewhere like L.A.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 11:57 AM
-1

models are gross. Chosen by gay men because they have the bodies of little boys
/r/MensRights07/06/11 11:54 AM
2

And stay at home moms really need to dress beautifully and cover themselves with makeup. Like, no stay at home mom has ever worn sneakers.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:15 AM
1

So now it's men's own fault if they aren't a functioning part of the "patriarchy"? If you aren't oppressing women it's because you're a loser who isn't trying hard enough?
/r/MensRights05/06/11 01:10 PM
1

Soon the moderates on both sides will realize they're fighting for the same thing. That neither side will accomplish their goals without the input and efforts of the other. We will open up gender roles for men, allowing gender roles for women to truly open, opening the roles for men more, then women. It's all circular.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 12:16 PM
1

Rape: Just lie there and take it. I dunno doesn't sound right to me....
/r/MensRights31/05/11 12:57 AM
3

What the OP wrote?
/r/seduction28/05/11 08:49 PM
0

Of course you're right. If everyone's being upfront and communicative there will be no problem. This is only used when you ask someone to make plans and get no response.
/r/seduction28/05/11 08:42 PM
1

my god... you've done it. It's so beautiful.
/r/seduction26/05/11 02:59 AM
1

That was very good.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 02:38 AM
3

That was downvoted because it was retarded
/r/MensRights26/05/11 02:15 AM
4

today while watching the news they mentioned that a local shelter had been opened to help homeless women. My girlfriend said "yeah, cause only homeless women need any help" I responded "Are there even any homeless men? I only ever see homeless women" as always... sarcasm
/r/MensRights26/05/11 02:08 AM
8

tsk tsk... Men! When will you just grow up and conform to your gender role?! CONFORM!
/r/MensRights25/05/11 12:30 PM
1

I know right? Pag totally works.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 12:25 PM
3

or -AHEM- the rest of, y'know' the planet.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 06:18 PM
2

If only people cared about breast cancer more. I mean, you hardley every even hear about it. FFS it is the most absurdly over hyped disease on earth. I was actually very confused when I learned that breast cancer is not the number one killer of humans on this planet. I figured that it must be since it is shoved down our throats.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 09:47 AM
1

I think it was one of the first things I read here on MR a few years ago.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:46 PM
3

Wish I did. My example is from one I saw on TV late night. the second one (from which I did not give specific examples) was on a CBC radio show for international women's day. It was a lot more subtle. Consisting mostly of a young woman saying the wage gap and many other problems will never be solved until we start examining the gender roles we give to men. Specifically how we view stay at home fathers. I should keep track so I can pass it on. Still my point is whether it's the MR movement or jus…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:45 PM
5

It was sarcasm. I read an article about sex tourism in the Caribbean. Women in their 40s hire young black male prostitutes. The article was telling how the young men exploit the women's need for affection.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:48 PM
3

you know who else used sarcasm? Hitler
/r/MensRights19/05/11 10:24 AM
6

No beacuse those women (not the anti abortion, the other three) are lonely. Men are exploiting there loneliness for their own sick sexual and finacial benefit.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 10:22 AM
9

I feel like it's come a long way already. I've been here two years. I met people who mocked the whole concept of MR back then. I'm in the closet about it so I can always play devils advocate. I'd ask probing questions and add little facts. But I never argued. Arguments can intrench peoples opinions. Two years later I hear these same people mocking the whole concept of circumcision or alimony. I hear them complain, not about the wage gap, but about how feminists seem to want only to complain abou…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:16 AM
1

it can't be true because: People have formed opinions of others.
/r/seduction03/05/11 10:15 PM
1

Here's my source:
/r/MensRights30/04/11 10:30 PM
11

Back in a day. Me and my buddy used to go up to this town every weekend to hang out with this pack of chicks we lucked into. Every weekend we would decide on a new funny joke that would make no sense to them. One week we talked all shizzle izzle. the next weekend it was all sim's talk. "Brenlaminan stana. I'm soren ikkay" Each time we had a funny joke that would just make them feel like they were trying to catch up to us. Man we plowed through them.
/r/seduction30/04/11 04:39 AM
2

I don't believe they should be separate. How can they be? I am, however, stuck using the language of our time. "Feminist" and "MRA" will ultimately become redundant I feel.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 04:26 AM
3

I hope that you'll be part of a new wave of feminists that will understand what's happening. All our problems, male and female, come down to the way we view gender roles. But Female gender roles don't function independent from the roles of men. The two are reciprocal. Thus we can't truly change one independent from the other. We can't battle wage inequality until we look at it's source: The gendered role of "mother". We have to redefine the roles of both men and women so that men can be stay at …
/r/MensRights29/04/11 03:32 AM
3

it's almost like the whole argument comes down to: HER:Women are victims of a sexist conspiracy. We should be paid more. HIM: Women do make less for the following reasons: blah blah blah blah. HER: NO! I don't want to solve this problem. I just want to complain and be a victim.
/r/MensRights21/04/11 03:34 AM
1

you're just describing the origin of this social construct. The same pre-birth control issues are what created the men-work-women-stay-home model. Married women were always pregnant and had a lot of kids. So working wasn't really an option. In fact marriage was pretty much just a way of keeping people together to raise kids. Backed up by religion. Religion too. Just a social construct created to lubricate society and keep it functioning. Kinda took on a life of it's own though... Pretty much eve…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:05 AM
2

If a man refuses sex he's a fucking fag. If a woman does it she's admirable. Also, due to the constructs of society, it's easy to be a slut and hard to be a stud. The more you think about it the more nuanced it is. We need to open gender roles for men and women if this is ever to end.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 02:58 AM
2

I'm hardly treating gender roles as irrelevant and dismissing them. I am, however, blatantly calling you out on your use of the word "Privilege" to describe the oppressive gender roles placed on men. I notice you didn't use that word in your response.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 01:34 AM
11

the male privilege to work all day to feed their family? or the male privilege to have to sacrifice your own safety to protect women or children? or the male privilege to die sooner? Which privilege exactly? Stop with the old school feminist male conspiracy garbage. Men and women have restrictive gender roles. There are benefits and negatives to both. Staying home raising your kids is just as much a privilege as working in a god damned coal mine or fighting in a war.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 11:15 AM
1

But when Tigers wife actually does hit him with a golf club... Comedy Gold
/r/MensRights12/04/11 01:04 AM
3

who gives a shit?
/r/MensRights11/04/11 11:23 AM
7

What kind of lesson does this teach young men? If a woman cheats on you, it's your fault? You have to fight to get the cheating bitch back? Why can't we teach young men to value themselves beyond the value of their girlfriend and to have the self confidence to walk away from a cheater?
/r/MensRights11/04/11 11:21 AM
10

Why do women deserve anything from men? Has anyone stopped to think maybe men have desires of their own? Maybe men prefer the lives they've chosen. And why shouldn't they? The alternative Career, Marriage, Divorce, Child support payments for next decade and a half, Bachelor pad, not appreciated as a father, never see your kids, sacrifice everything and get thrown under the bus for it when it wasn't what you wanted in the first place. Doesn't sound too good. I'd much rather enjoy my life and not …
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:06 PM
2

when I was a kid my parents never gave me the proceeds from selling a house and I turned out fine. I don't think it's a necessary thing for a kid.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:43 AM
0

or that one male will abuse multiple females while females are more "monogamous" with their abuse.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 08:48 PM
2

were you even trying to hear what they were saying?
/r/MensRights05/04/11 10:57 AM
10

Lets not forget that the women were "oppressed" by having to give up "their" jobs (the jobs they took from the men. For the war effort. Not a bad thing but a fact.). The men were "(not?) oppressed" by being sent to die and kill in a fucking war. So lets just keep in mind that the "roles" for both genders had down sides. I think it would be good to ask ourselves who had it worse. Women don't get to work Men have to work and kill and die for their country.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 03:43 PM
1

of course. I thought that was one of the things MR wanted.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 03:38 PM
1

You're missing my point. If a man is consenting to having a child when he has sex why isn't a woman? If a man isn't allowed any choice after wards why is the woman?
/r/MensRights02/04/11 03:39 AM
1

So you don't believe in abortion or adoption?
/r/MensRights02/04/11 03:13 AM
1

Then why should the woman be given any choice? she had unprotected sex as well. She "chose this". Why doesn't she get the same response from you?
/r/MensRights01/04/11 02:17 PM
3

Nobody's getting a forced abortion.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:48 AM
2

It's her body, not his. That is why no man ever will have the same options as a woman. This only makes sense if we accept it as obvious that men should pay child support.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:45 AM
3

if it doesn't work?
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:54 AM
3

Allowing a parent to decide to raise a child in a traditional manner and to expect some support from the other parent is perfectly ethical It's only ethical as long as you ignore that this allowance forces another person into a life they didn't choose.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:42 AM
18

For real, a woman finally says "Hey, I don't think male gender roles are very well defined right now" We should definitely applaud her.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 10:57 AM
3

Wasn't the original article written by a friend of his? And didn't it totally assume he was innocent? And tell his side of the story in full? Hardly mud slinging
/r/MensRights22/03/11 10:54 AM
1

Marriage can work. People can find someone of the opposite sex who can be their best friend for life. It can also turn out shit. When that happens it can be very bad for the guys. I'm sure I don't need to elaborate for anyone here. So men just don't want to settle. It seems obvious to me. Ask any guy if they would ever worry about the effects a divorce would have on their lives.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 07:13 AM
1

of course. that's the point.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 02:05 AM
9

True is true. Imagine if all we had was an article written from her perspective: "White girl attacked in study room by terrorist!"
/r/MensRights15/03/11 12:37 AM
1

Exactly. Now we just slag off on women? Someone should just remove this post.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 09:15 PM
2

Would you cut off a child's hand if his father was missing one? You never answered if you would or would not. why or why not? No answer. how are the two scenarios different? No answer. In the post I was responding too you were making the point that if the father has been circumcised and the child has not the child may think that there is something "wrong with him" I asked the questions I asked because I wanted to discuss that point. You "expanded" on this point by hijacking the conversation in a…
/r/MensRights11/03/11 08:22 PM
3

Sorry but your mono paragraphical rambling post seemed to have nothing to do with the question I asked or the post before it. Just... totally out of left field there. I award you no points.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 04:18 AM
1

The point is that this isn't about who should or shouldn't be paying child support. It's about whether there is or isn't some guy slaving to pay child support every month (or else). No one cares who it is. As long as they're male. A straight couple consists of one male. Path of least resistance. Get him to pay.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 01:18 PM
2

When I was a child my parents (hetero couple) had a friend. He helped my dad on the farm, was always around, baby sat us, bought us presents, took us to McDonalds. Did a lot of "dad stuff" I would be obtuse to try and say his role had no fatherly aspects. I'm sure he would agree. Should he have been stuck paying child support because of it? Why or why not? What's the difference between these two scenarios? If I had had two "poor helpless women" raising me would it be different? If my dad had lef…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 01:07 PM
4

NO! A male presence has no "value". Men can only contribute to child's existence by paying money. And men must contribute financially any time they take on a parental role. If I were a woman I would just hook up with guy after guy. Only ever long enough to get them on tape saying something like: "I feel like a dad" or something. BAM! another check every month.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 12:59 PM
9

Would you cut off a child's hand if his father was missing one? why or why not? how are the two scenarios different?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:17 AM
2

seriously. Does that even happen? And if it does, it's for nothing other that "Tradition"?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:15 AM
10

If you just replace "male" with "female" the article would sound exactly the same as a defense of female circumcision. Same exact arguments.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 09:35 PM
12

The way you say it it sounds like it has no real effect at all. Good or bad. If that's so then why not just let people make the choice on their own later on?
/r/MensRights09/03/11 09:30 PM
2

how old is International now?
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:41 PM
1

NO! because WAR is caused by men. If women ran the world THERE WOULD NEVER EVER BE ANY VIOLENCE! I mean, come on.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:41 PM
2

There is a very real problem of "blackness" being seen as all negative stereotypes. Doing well in school? You're an Oreo. Dress in clothes that fit? Oreo. Don't speak in ebonics? Race traitor.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:38 PM
0

I know, the "team" argument was totally lost on me. Not really lost so much as rejected.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:56 PM
9

we are not "against women" we are not working against women Or am I not a men's rights supporter?
/r/MensRights07/03/11 07:35 PM
-2

good one
/r/MensRights15/02/11 06:41 PM
1

Amen. He's gunna start whining now. "where are the girls who want a LTR?"
/r/seduction09/02/11 01:16 PM
9

You know when they say "just be yourself"? It's not because being yourself will bag you any girl you want. It's because when you act like yourself you will only end up with people who like that. When you craft a pseudo personality to help yourself bag club skanks you will end up with girls who are attracted to that personality. They won't change. Why should they? They're being themselves. Also... Think about how crazy you seem to them. You act one way, and send out all sorts of signs of what typ…
/r/seduction09/02/11 01:14 PM
1

It's, like, THE men's rights issue
/r/MensRights08/02/11 01:54 AM
1

we still outlaw all FGM in all form as barbaric and turn a blind eye to MGM.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 04:16 AM
1

Rare or not, it's outlawed as barbarism. We except NO excuse for any damage done to female genitalia. But we will take any ludicrous justification and run with in men's case. I mean, HIV? Wear a goddamn condom. Why don't we just start cutting out babies appendixes? just as much chance of a problem there.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 04:05 AM
-2

So the guy who got a freak infection and had to get his foreskin chopped off seems to think that his "dick cheese" problem is representative of the norm. Buddy, it sounds like you have some funky freaky stinky dick. You probably did need that circumcision. I have never heard of every other day dick cheese. gah
/r/MensRights27/01/11 09:24 PM
2

When your mom tells the story is she regretful or is a "funny" story?
/r/MensRights27/01/11 09:15 PM
1

You must be new here
/r/MensRights27/01/11 09:13 PM
0

As far as I know, all FGM cases involve clitoris removal. Then you, quite simply, don't know what you're talking about. You should just delete your comments since they are so off base
/r/MensRights27/01/11 09:11 PM
0

FGM is more akin to chopping off the head of the penis (or worse, depending on the specific type of FGM) Or it can be a ceremonial nick that just draws blood. But all forms of FGM are outlawed.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 09:08 PM
12

How is it "feminist" to circumcise men? I mean seriously? Anything that isn't the MR party line is the Feminist party line? It's just the way a lot of people grew up. You're asking people to think critically about something that they have just accepted as fact for their whole life. It has nothing to do with Feminist.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 01:00 PM
8

I would rather that we be able to make jokes like this for both genders than no jokes at all
/r/MensRights23/01/11 02:56 PM
2

DOES THIS STILL HAPPEN?
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:49 AM
2

This is an excerpt from a book that's more than twenty years old now a bit more than 12 months
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:39 AM
11

First it is ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed. Then it is accepted as common sense.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 01:59 PM
10

Disregard popular girls. Find a cute nerd with a nice set and go for it.
/r/seduction11/01/11 01:35 PM
2

So... if you were assaulting someone and they pushed you to the ground you would shoot them? just wanna be clear what we're talking about.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:04 AM
2

My success rate is 100 per cent So he catches all the women who would have cheated? If he can't catch them then they are faithful? What would a 50% success rate look like?
/r/MensRights14/12/10 03:00 AM
6

we won't know how long this generation will live until they die.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 12:34 AM
17

This sounds like it could be the basis for Eat, Prey, Love 2
/r/MensRights14/12/10 12:28 AM
1

Sorry, I really meant "sometimes some people seem to believe so"
/r/MensRights11/12/10 03:23 PM
1

sometimes...
/r/MensRights11/12/10 06:02 AM
0

Amen
/r/seduction11/12/10 05:11 AM
2

Really I thought INTERPOL was always called in to handle rape cases
/r/MensRights09/12/10 12:18 PM
2

From the comments: C'mon, now. I don't care what your rationales may be; it is always a crap shoot whether or not children will be safe when left in the care of men-even their own fathers. Need I remind women everywhere that men are NOT women, either in their sex drives or in their bonding capabilities?
/r/MensRights07/12/10 12:41 PM
3

male children aren't as important. After all... they'll just grow up to be child molesters.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 12:30 PM
3

we won't go extinct. White people aren't a different species. We'll just blend in... slowly...
/r/MensRights23/11/10 10:19 PM
2

So basically you are the people the article is talking about.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 10:33 PM
2

can you expand on this point a little?
/r/MensRights26/10/10 10:31 PM
0

snap
/r/MensRights05/10/10 11:50 AM
3

why would you resist the step that solves the problem?
/r/MensRights05/10/10 11:36 AM
22

yeah, the game isn't designed for LTRs. Honestly, I'm mostly into this stuff for the way I can use it in a my relationship. I've been with my girlfriend for over 7 years. I mostly use it in arguments. It's changed a lot of things. You always have to be on. Keep fit, walk around naked, use the body language around the house, hold the remote, and make decisions. Make plans for the weekend, have hobbies and interests of your own. Exert your presence in the home. If you let them, women will try to s…
/r/seduction30/09/10 08:44 PM
2

They know nothing about this style of relationship. All the advice is: Do everything she wants all the time. Give into every desire and completely submit to her in every way. Compromise until you are nothing.
/r/seduction30/09/10 07:57 PM
3

Stop posting that stupid video
/r/MensRights20/09/10 08:32 PM
5

we lookin fo you, we gon' find you we gon' fiiind you...
/r/MensRights17/09/10 08:45 PM
1

The article explains it
/r/MensRights08/09/10 02:53 AM
2

Your ex doesn't have to pay you for that
/r/MensRights23/08/10 11:02 AM
12

Bachelors have wives now?
/r/MensRights18/08/10 11:01 AM
2

good point. Maybe that's why marriage was originally designed as a "for life" thing.
/r/MensRights16/07/10 02:05 AM
3

Yeaaaaah riiiiight... he liked it. -99% of the population
/r/MensRights14/07/10 01:14 AM
1

Bull. Shit.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 11:21 AM
2

Couldn't have put it better
/r/MensRights28/05/10 01:15 AM
3

If she decides to keep it, knowing the man doesn't want to be involved, and it sucks for the kid that is her fault and society should blame them. She ultimately has the choice to abort, put it up for adoption, or keep it.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 01:02 AM
1

when they are caught it isn't even treated as pedophilia.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 12:48 AM
4

Seems like they can't do anything. Try to raise him to be a man? Wrong! Don't raise him to be a man? Wrong!
/r/MensRights18/03/10 11:22 AM
2

Okay... just... fill in the blanks here. I'm a dude. I want my girlfriend to believe that she is pregnant. so I _____________________________
/r/MensRights14/03/10 02:33 PM
10

How would a man fake a pregnancy?
/r/MensRights13/03/10 11:39 PM
3

Whoa everyone. Let's just remember that two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights10/03/10 12:50 PM
3

IMO a lot of the things that we deem as harassment (even when it's a man doing it to a woman) are simply not. There are lots of times when a woman should 'man up' However, the standard now seems to be: Any suggestive action towards a female (no matter how small) is horrible harassment worth a firing and any suggestive action towards a man (no matter how embarrassing or whatever) should just be taken as a complement.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 02:24 AM
2

It's other people's mess that's gross. Their mess it fine.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 12:20 PM
5

actually it's women peeing everywhere. They try to hover over the seat so they don't have to sit on it. It gets piss everywhere. It's a vicious cycle. Men can aim their pee.
/r/MensRights25/02/10 11:33 PM
13

don't downvote him. This article did over generalize. Are these the things men fear that are driving them away from marriage? Sure. But are all women horrible users who secretly plan to marry, quit working, demand nannies, poolboys, lattes and spa treatments, then a divorce, alimony, the kids, house, and cars, while unloading debt onto their exes? No. Even the way the article seems to assume that all men actually have enough money for these things. Second properties, multiple bank accounts, nann…
/r/MensRights25/02/10 12:32 PM
7

I was being sarcastic. There was a post on reddit awhile back that said this. It was about women being taken advantage of by male prostitutes
/r/MensRights21/02/10 04:20 AM
4

what's wrong is that these men are taking advantage of lonely women for financial gain. Edit:Sorry, I forgot that sarcasm doesn't come through in type
/r/MensRights20/02/10 10:45 PM
3

That's what I'm saying The "male version didn't touch at all on gender issues
/r/MensRights20/02/10 04:48 PM
13

Okay. I watched them both. They both made some valid points along the line of: Things that individual men and women do for each other when they are in a relationship. Some of the things in the "Male version" weren't even for someone else (like going to work) And you know what there's nothing wrong with pointing out the trouble we go through for each other. Shaving, waxing, dieting, working out(was that mentioned?). Sometimes we can get caught up in our own efforts and forget what our spouses do …
/r/MensRights20/02/10 01:03 AM
3

TL:DR black people are raping babies now
/r/MensRights19/02/10 03:32 AM
5

From what I've read and from what I've seen, it would seem that in mainstream porn the man is usually an invisible ignored figure. I really don't want to debate objectification vs deification. Or get into whether you think sex is a form of domination to begin with or if a woman can be glorified and fucked at the same time. I didn't even read the article. I just feel that porn tends to focus more on the theme "beautiful woman has sex" rather than "Man dominates woman" I guess that will inevitably…
/r/MensRights10/02/10 12:14 AM
2

HAHA YES! And we get to go and work at awesome jobs. Down in the mine shafts we'll work and sing and have such a gay fun time. Working is so awesome!
/r/MensRights09/02/10 12:01 PM
1

that sounds good. Also, I wasn't speaking from personal experience (I have no spare bedroom). I was just clarifying. I will say that, as far as the article and personal opinions go, I don't think the law should require people to do equal chores. But I do think people should. If a couple set up a system like the one you detailed, and one person couldn't do their share, then you shouldn't marry that person or continue the relationship unless you don't care.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 02:03 AM
2

I think what XDFRaven is getting at is: If you want to clean more often because you like things cleaner who's standard should set the norm? Should your husband/BF have to vacuum every night because you want to vacuum every night? Or can he watch TV while you vacuum the spare bedroom again when no one has even been in there? I'm all for equal splitting of chores. I'm just trying to clarify.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 12:50 PM
1

I think mens rights are important and deserve attention. I think this submission has nothing to do with mens rights Down. Vote.
/r/MensRights07/02/10 04:38 PM
4

To me this is the men's issue. It is a great example of how society doesn't even understand the concept of men having rights. People will try to point out that female circumcision is worse or that it's "not a big deal". The thought that cutting up babies penises for no reason at all is wrong has never crossed their minds. And many people can't make it fit with their world view. It's so simple. It's dangerous to do it. It's not dangerous to leave it. And it's wrong to mutilate anyone's genitals w…
/r/MensRights03/02/10 12:37 AM
2

Oh, I'm sorry, is this sub reddit officially about bitching about women now?
/r/MensRights24/01/10 10:01 PM
3

so you think female circumcision is okay?
/r/MensRights22/01/10 12:49 PM
25

Mommies read stories to children. And daddies shoot mommies. Everyone knows this
/r/MensRights21/01/10 12:35 AM
21

except for the assholes who call you a mangina for not hating women with a seething passion
/r/MensRights20/01/10 12:49 PM
1

Oh yeah, I can't say that this film is actually an example. I've never seen it and know nothing about it. I was just explaining what point people are trying to get at. You have given the clearest explanation of the plot yet. At this point I think it is nothing to be upset about. A better example would be the film "here on earth". Again, I just wanted to explain what other people were thinking.
/r/MensRights20/01/10 12:35 PM
3

The point is that a film can be based on empathizing with a woman who is cheating on a man who loves her and wants to marry her and society seems to think that the emotional needs of this man can just be shit all over. To anyone who thinks about it it should be obvious that the male character is being treated very poorly by a selfish woman. Yet it's the woman who we are supposed to care and worry about. Generally, one of the issues that surfaces on mensrights is that male emotional needs seem to…
/r/MensRights18/01/10 08:55 PM
5

I think the real problem is that people who frequent mensrights know what the point is so nobody bothers to explain it. You see this is a great example of the double standards that men face. It is never okay for men to cheat. But romance films can be based on the premise of a woman cheating. Take a look at some of the comments here accusing men of being misogynists for saying rude things about the character. Tiger Woods gets assaulted with a golf club and women around the world applaud. Nobody b…
/r/MensRights18/01/10 08:44 PM
0

can you guess why? HINT: the reason is similar to why it was okay for his wife to assault him with a golf club.
/r/MensRights18/01/10 08:37 PM
1

wouldn't it benefit an entire species?
/r/MensRights18/01/10 08:33 PM
2

does he sleep with the new girl? EDIT: Apparently she doesn't sleep with the new guy in "Leap year" so yatta yatta yatta. Not that bad.
/r/MensRights18/01/10 12:14 PM
11

Poor girl, which man will make her as happy as she deserves to be? Reminds me of this film
/r/MensRights18/01/10 01:43 AM
2

I don't see how it's obviously the parents but yeah the kid probably learned this somewhere. What I wonder though is what exactly happened.
/r/MensRights15/01/10 12:01 PM
1

This is the sketch everyone found so offensive. It really isn't at all.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 12:18 PM
6

poor guy. She didn't have to slap him.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 03:13 AM
2

Yeah, question marks don't really work like that.
/r/MensRights08/01/10 02:07 AM
4

What part of TEN YEARS AGO do you not understand? The kid has been in school for 6 years.
/r/MensRights08/01/10 12:40 AM
3

He could be fucking dead
/r/MensRights06/01/10 12:04 AM
10

they deleted everything
/r/MensRights05/01/10 12:15 PM
9

The kid got in trouble for pointing his fingers at other kids?
/r/MensRights29/12/09 12:51 PM
4

stay classy
/r/MensRights28/12/09 12:25 PM
3

From the comments: You poor, poor thing. Try to remember that there's a difference between being smacked with an open (female) hand and being slugged by a (male) fist. Also try to remember that it hurts to know that your once perfect body has been ravaged by giving birth to the two offspring of this "world's greatest" who demand 120% of your time and energy while HE is off cavorting with porn stars who aren't burdened by the needs of his infants. Check out Link and check your conscience for obvi…
/r/MensRights14/12/09 12:44 PM
0

seems like the standard format to me.
/r/MensRights09/12/09 11:34 PM
0

good theory.... makes more sense really....
/r/MensRights09/12/09 11:34 PM
0

I think there would be a stigma attached to any guy who tried to.
/r/MensRights09/12/09 11:33 PM
5

I think we're confusing cause and effect here. Does a fear of not being "manly" force men into being idiots? Or, does being an idiot cause you to be concerned with being "manly"?
/r/MensRights07/12/09 12:30 AM
3

Christmas is the ultimate example of men always being wrong. God help you if you get her something she doesn't like. And if she get's you something you don't like you can never say anything. Just picture. someone gets their significant other a hideous shirt. How different does it play out depending on the sex of the parties? You see it time and again on TV and in real life. The Man opens up the gift to find something awful. He grins and bears it, pretends he likes it and gets over it. AS YOU SHO…
/r/MensRights02/12/09 10:25 PM
2

No no, didn't you know? Women are the responsible frugal shoppers. Men are the ones who waste money on stuff.... well, not in this example.... Fuck it, men are always wrong anyways.
/r/MensRights02/12/09 10:06 PM
10

True, this post should have been pointing out how it is really wrong for anyone to make unsolicited advances, man or woman. But it's just as wrong to elbow someone in the face (or knee them in the crotch). As far as I see it a harsh word should be enough. "Keep your fucking hands to yourself" should do it. I think the elbow to the face is not a "right" nor is a slap or a thrown drink. I guess this is some kind of overzealous reaction to the paradigm that retaliatory violence against men is seen …
/r/MensRights28/11/09 03:59 PM
5

haven't you seen the justice video?
/r/MensRights28/11/09 03:48 PM
0

Yeah, go join nambla you fuckin' perv.
/r/MensRights22/11/09 03:54 AM
1

work their what?
/r/MensRights22/11/09 03:50 AM
0

Yeah, well, it's not because they are crazy overzealous feminazis. It's because they insulted disabled people. Or something. I could barely figure out what was being said.
/r/MensRights17/11/09 11:38 PM
2

exactly. They don't even need names as long as they are rich and handsome. most aren't really even "people"
/r/MensRights29/10/09 04:58 AM
1

Here: http://www.dancarlin.com/hhredir.php?show=Show-26---(BLITZ)-Addicted-to-Bondage EDIT: I guess brackets in the URL fucks up a link.
/r/MensRights28/10/09 09:58 PM
1

Yes exactly. Keydemographic is just being obtuse
/r/MensRights28/10/09 09:51 PM
1

ignorance is bliss I guess
/r/MensRights28/10/09 12:14 AM
2

I know my lineage You know some of it sure. Do you realize how may different lineages converge to make you? And how far back they go? Think about it. millions of years. After awhile you reach a point where you share common ancestors with everyone on earth and eventually with every single living thing. I guarantee you there's a slave owner in there somewhere.
/r/MensRights27/10/09 09:45 PM
2

Did you want to try that again? This time you could, maybe, make some sense
/r/MensRights27/10/09 03:17 PM
2

Everyone's ancestors owned slaves. Also everyone has ancestors who were slaves. Black, white, whatever. History keeps going back. Even BEFORE the U.S.A. EDIT: Your point still stands though.
/r/MensRights27/10/09 03:14 PM
1

So I can't refrain things. Things can only refrain themselves. right? I was confused trying to make a sentence without saying "refrain from"
/r/MensRights26/10/09 05:27 AM
2

so what would you say? Refrained of? Lets say I don't want my dog to leave the yard. If I can't say "Refrained from leaving the yard" but I need to use the word refrained. What do I say?
/r/MensRights26/10/09 04:35 AM
2

You won;t hear me arguing
/r/MensRights21/10/09 02:17 AM
3

Except the focus seems to be on men's inability to understand women and how stupid they are for failing to.
/r/MensRights21/10/09 02:09 AM
7

true. Never look a gift horse in the mouth or whatever. Just pointing out that this is one of those "We support women, after all they're so weak and stupid they need it." kind of things. My sister loves to point out how this kind of thing is actually not for women but against.
/r/MensRights20/10/09 02:53 PM
7

The “pink lines”, painted pink, are 2.5 meters wide rather than the standard 2.3, offering aid to women drivers unskilled at parking. I think we wouldn't like being given them for that reason
/r/MensRights20/10/09 02:36 PM
2

The men will just rape and rape and rape
/r/MensRights20/10/09 02:30 PM
1

wait.... what does that find? Also they may need some type of analyst-therapist hybrid
/r/MensRights12/10/09 04:06 PM
1

It's like we have this concept that children and adults have nothing to do with one another. We can't punish children, make them do chores, fail them or let them be independent. The children must be protected from everything. So what do we do when they grow up and are completely useless? Fuck em' they're adults now.
/r/MensRights08/10/09 08:20 PM
3

One time some girls laid out a whole story for me. Her previous relationship had been with an abusive man. I listened with sympathy. Later I met some of this guys family. When they heard what town I was from they asked if I knew this girl. She used to go out with their brother they said. She was crazy they said. A real nut. I think I mumbled something about abusive boyfriends and left. A few months ago I ended up getting into a conversation about her with some buddies who knew her and her ex. Wh…
/r/MensRights08/10/09 04:16 PM
1

Soon that will be abuse.
/r/MensRights08/10/09 04:07 PM
9

I would've told her to leave that nice man alone. He deserves better than some horrible cheating mental case. She deserves that asshole.
/r/MensRights30/09/09 02:11 PM
1

Honestly I don't care if violent [male] rapists and [male]serial killers are raped. is that what you meant?
/r/MensRights22/09/09 02:52 PM
1

Honestly I don't care if violent [male] rapists and [male]serial killers are raped. is that what you meant?
/r/MensRights22/09/09 02:52 PM
5

yes but getting an article on the front page takes more than one person.
/r/MensRights22/09/09 12:33 AM
5

So... it wasn't the front page, like you said? Because you said it was the posts on the front page that was the problem. Now it's individuals and the comments they made? I'm sure you could find as many fanatical (seeming) people on the feminist side no? The top comment here on this discussion is a screen shot of the front screen. You haven't pointed out the offending articles there yet. Well, I'll give you a chance to rewrite your argument now.
/r/MensRights21/09/09 03:01 PM
2

are we laughing together here? Or are you laughing at me?
/r/MensRights11/09/09 03:39 PM
2

well, we can probably agree this is going nowhere
/r/MensRights10/09/09 03:41 PM
1

No that's not it at all. You are phrasing things in a way that forces you to have to come back and explain yourself more clearly later on and that can be seen as offensive without clarification. If you believe all women act a certain way, use the word 'all'. If you think only some act that way then say that. Making yourself clearly understood isn't about bowing to feminism. It's just necessary if you want to be taken seriously. I really hope that anyone interested in men's rights who comes here …
/r/MensRights10/09/09 02:50 PM
2

I subscribe to this subreddit and I support the mens rights movement. You shouldn't phrase things like that. You make us all look bad when you do.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 03:05 AM
1

Oh, okay, I guess they do contribute to scientific development. Way to stick to the point and not just make an ass out of yourself.
/r/MensRights09/09/09 03:27 AM
1

If the father cannot be contacted within a certain time period, he is required to pay child support and gets visitation rights if the mother chooses to keep the child. hmmm... I don't feel this is right. I like everything else you said though. It seems to me that a woman who decides to keep a child when she can''t get in contact with the father should be conscious of the fact that he isn't there. She obviously must consider the possibility that he never will be again. Where is he? who knows? If …
/r/MensRights09/09/09 12:04 AM
2

yes, all the starving people in africa, asia, south america, and everywhere else are really contributing to scientific development.
/r/MensRights08/09/09 10:14 PM
7

Nice list. Laid out very well. A lot of people mentioned #4. I think that we do have to make the compromise that she is being asked to carry a child. She can do that for you if she wants to. But you can't force her too. And really what's the big deal? You're fertile. If she won't carry your baby and you want one so bad find a woman who will. You don't need to have this baby Also, when people bring up 'what about the children?' - the old argument that, if we don't force men to pay child support, …
/r/MensRights07/09/09 03:56 PM
7

Similarly, the right to abortion is not the right to opt out of the child raising process, nor is it the right to not be a parent. It is the right to not be pregnant. Is that officially stated somewhere? It may be true. Except that abortion really is both. You can't say that there is any way that you could abort the child but still raise it. I suppose it really isn't important what the on-paper reason for abortion is. It's more important what it actually is. The right to abortion is the right to…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 03:35 PM
1

Cool beans. This barely ever happens. We both agree then. Nice
/r/MensRights04/09/09 02:27 AM
1

no, just that women do have the right to be free from providing for the child they created using abortion or adoption. I was just pointing out the double standard. when you said: I don't understand any good reason [somebody] should be free from providing for the child [they] created; that's just personal responsibility. you really meant I don't understand any good reason men - not women- should be free from providing for the child [they] created; that's just personal responsibility. here's an ex…
/r/MensRights03/09/09 08:00 PM
1

Yeah, you're a lost cause.
/r/MensRights03/09/09 07:35 PM
0

Fuck you shit head, Your attempt to reach common ground is just a transparent attempt to derail the conversation. You haven't addressed a single point made by anyone. you just keep saying 'yeah but can we all agree that women get pregnant and men don't?" In case you haven't noticed: Everyone already knows that. It is established common ground. Can the debate begin now? Apparently you have trouble understanding but it's already going on! But you are too busy making some pointless stand about find…
/r/MensRights03/09/09 11:38 AM
1

you kinda missed my point, eh?
/r/MensRights03/09/09 01:07 AM
0

Oh my god, this is ridiculous. Yes women get pregnant and men don't. And yes a woman has the right to decide what happens to her body. The issue is that 'her decision' about 'her body' also - by law - determines what happens to the man. do you see how the law creates the issue and is thus the true problem here? if she decides to either have the child, abort it, or put it up for adoption, she will do so based on certain factors. As the law stands now the desires of her partner is irrelevant. But …
/r/MensRights03/09/09 12:07 AM
1

I don't understand any good reason you should be free from providing for the child you created; that's just personal responsibility. Wow. I have never seen anybody argue against the right to give a child up for adoption. I understand if you are pro life but that's a little extreme don't you think? oh... or were you just talking about men?
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:45 PM
2

Her decision to become a parent should not be predicated on assuming she can compel the man to provide for her financial needs. Yes. This is the main point for me. I know a lot of guys who's girlfriends got pregnant without their consent (sometimes on purpose) and later, when they expressed their frustration, taunted them by pointing out that they had no choice and would have to pay no matter what. One of my friends had to give up a music career because of this. These are anecdotes, I know, but …
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:39 PM
4

Seriously, the other message we were fed growing up is "Women hate sexuality. They despise it and only tolerate it in order to form emotional bonds with men" On television the women always want to "slow down" and "wait until the right time". They aren't interested in sex only in a pure chaste emotional bond.
/r/MensRights18/06/09 09:17 AM
-1

Kuonji said it pretty well
/r/MensRights17/06/09 10:14 PM
4

The reason is because it is sexual harassment to do that.
/r/MensRights17/06/09 08:45 PM
5

This is why I always carry a few hard boiled eggs in my pocket. "You're hungry? Here. I've got some salt here too if you want. Sorry it's not in packages"
/r/MensRights06/06/09 09:28 AM
3

EVERYONE SHOULD NOT BE PARENTS I think this "writer" means "not everyone should be parents" Don’t look up one day and they are disrespecting you or turning their backs on you when you need them Don't (be suprised if you?) look up one day and they are disrespecting you or turning their backs on you when you need them crap writing
/r/MensRights05/06/09 09:59 AM
1

The more you comment the more you seem to agree with the basic premis. In certain situations men should have the right to opt out. I think the main thing is that in a typical "Psycho girlfriend" situation the girlfriend made her choices before getting pregnant. If they knew that the man could simply opt out they would have made differant choices. If you can't use a baby as leverage you may decide not to have one. for other cases of accidental pregnancy it comes down to incentives. If a woman wan…
/r/MensRights27/05/09 09:54 AM
1

Proper formatting: It's important
/r/MensRights27/05/09 09:42 AM
2

it isn't about being fair, it's just about biology If it was just about biology we wouldn't hold men accountable. Men are expected to take responsibility because "it's only fair". Otherwise they could just fuck and flee as much as they wanted.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 09:41 AM
6

I came here to say this. If my spouse and I divorce and have no children there should be no obligation to give anything. She is a capable woman ho can and should go get a job. When she had kids with another man, fine, she has to take care of them. Let him pay for it.
/r/MensRights01/05/09 08:28 AM
1

Yes. Why can't the women get support from men aswell? Isn't that a good idea? Why shouldn't men be involved in trying to bring more women on board? Sounds pretty sketchy
/r/MensRights23/04/09 11:59 AM
2

Fuck that! Lightning is sexist. End. Of. Story.
/r/MensRights21/04/09 09:41 AM
5

Have you been sneaking into our meetings? Seriously, what you said is a joke right?
/r/MensRights18/04/09 08:03 AM
1

A few years ago I read A Brief/Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson. That was when I realized that the real world is way more interesting than fiction.
/r/MensRights14/04/09 08:38 AM
3

The comments are great He is really trying to shaft her (forgive the term) and she feels such a fool and like she’s been too trusting. I wouldn’t mind, but the money he wants was savings for their children’s future! Why doesn't it say "The money she wants was savings for their children's future!"?
/r/MensRights27/03/09 05:55 PM
1

Did you forget you ere submitting to mensrights?
/r/MensRights20/03/09 06:53 PM
2

My Father in law has been suffering from depression. Recently I realized that he has no real "buddy space". He has an office but it only has one chair. I asked a few questions and basically, since he got married, his circle of friends has been reduced to men who are in other couples that he and his wife can hang out with. This is usually for things like dinner or drinks. Now he has no real buddies. My dad had a garage and he was out there all the time. His friends would drop by and hang out all …
/r/MensRights20/03/09 06:34 PM
2

Basically this comes down to women wanting a provider. It makes sense to think that these women wouldn't find there men so studly if they suddenly had no cash or if they ere transported back to cave man days. Then it would be the expert hunter who she would want.
/r/MensRights20/01/09 04:54 PM
2

I CANT'D BELIEVE YOU WOULD SAY SOMETHING LIKE THA- Oh... it was sarcasm... I get it.
/r/MensRights17/01/09 09:10 AM
3

Yeah, The guys story was fine. But then the first response mentions how no fault divorce was created by THE JEWS. After that it just gets worse and worse.
/r/MensRights17/12/08 11:45 PM
2

I can't believe this. Those articles illustrate exactly the difference everyone is talking about. They are about how the legal system treats men different (2-10), how lying about rape or abuse isn't seen as serious (2,4,7,9) How men are viewed as monsters or cash machines (5,6,10) And number 1 represents everything that the mens rights movement is about. That article is number 1 specifically because it doesn't attack women. It is just talking about what it's like to be a man in a society that ha…
/r/MensRights14/12/08 09:22 AM
4

really has nothing to do with mens rights. Does it?
/r/MensRights13/12/08 04:49 PM
1

Thats why I thought the video was so stupid. The message basically boils down too: Women are right even when they are not right. There is no room for the actual debate "which car insurance is better?" because when he tries to explain his point of view she can whip out a catch all argument "you don't respect my opinion". As for the bread. There are really only so many factors. Speed (obviously), integrity of seal, and (apparently) conformity to societies standards. I put very little value on #3, …
/r/MensRights01/12/08 01:04 PM
1

She isn't undermining him. He is undermining her. Reminds me of this: When I close a bag of bread I spin it and tuck it under. Why? it takes one second and achieves the exact same goal. But I am wrong if my girlfriend says I should put the tag on. I am seen as being lazy even though I am actually being efficient. I am just wrong.
/r/MensRights29/11/08 01:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter