| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PUA Research - Mystery Method evaluation confirms sexist tendencies of men and womenBlack Hats vs. White Hats I'm with you, everything comes down to a person's intent. Some stages are also ripe for misinterpretation, like assuming attraction, pushing to close, or going caveman. Maybe I simply need to check my intentions as I plow ahead assuming attraction or looking to close. Am I cooperating with this person, or simply steam-rolling opposition? Perhaps researchers will next study the camp-site rule. | /r/seduction | 25/08/11 04:56 PM |
| 1 | PUA Research - Mystery Method evaluation confirms sexist tendencies of men and womenI can see where you are coming from - i'm trying to practice 'outcome independence' on the research portion while wondering about the ethics of gaming anyone for anything. Gaming is so innocent and playful a term, whereas manipulating a person for sex doesn't seem as innocuous. Is there a difference, or does it depend on whether you are simply leading or following? | /r/seduction | 25/08/11 04:47 PM |
| 1 | Epic rejection by text message. What the heck happened?While I'm a little late to the party, I can see you nailed it. But what to do if OP would like to play more with this particular beauty? play it cool by not chasing OK, but I want moar. I was reading John Bowlby - "The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds" on google books. Fascinating stuff. Assuming that the obstacles to affection are internal to her, and that I was already out so I had nothing to lose, I might try to game her at another level, a relationship level: be the tree to her wind.… | /r/seduction | 16/08/11 07:42 PM |
| 2 | Why neediness is bad, why it exists, and how to fix iti shake my finger in your general direction | /r/seduction | 27/07/11 04:07 PM |
| 3 | A neat idea (I think): a grading rubric for self-evaluation of seduction/PUA skillsI like your idea, so i'll play. Former teacher :) Categories: inner game, outer game, peer review, normalized results. Subcategory innergame: freq in-state, intensity of state, duration of state. Evaluate on scale of 1-5. Qualitative description as reminder - i fell out of state alot tonight, but I was really in the zone while walking those random babes later on. Must've been because that venue was just not doing it for me. And so on. Pros: journaling helps draw out the self-analysis. Categories… | /r/seduction | 24/07/11 05:47 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter