| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Pure insanity. Swedish feminists want to ban peeing while standing up.Don't shit logs bigger than 2 Courics* | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 05:43 PM |
| 1 | Pure insanity. Swedish feminists want to ban peeing while standing up.I assume you're fucked orally if you're sitting on a dirty face. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 05:42 PM |
| 5 | Pure insanity. Swedish feminists want to ban peeing while standing up.I suppose that depends on how rusty the hypothetical trombone is... | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 05:39 PM |
| 5 | Because only men are abusers (seen in NHS pharmacy)Definitely, but I think that emotional abuse is much more difficult to combat than physical abuse. The less visible and more legal nature of emotional abuse makes it so that the consequences aren't really a deterrent, and it's more difficult for the average person to recognize victims of it. I have a feeling that emotionally abusive people are a lot less willing/able to change their behavior through societal pressure than physically abusive people. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/12 06:19 PM |
| 10 | Because only men are abusers (seen in NHS pharmacy)The disparity seems even more minimal when you take into consideration that there are many more single mothers who are the custodial parent, and this data only takes into consideration abusive caretakers. Still, though, the rate doesn't need to be higher to make the point that men aren't the only abusers of children in the world. I can understand using a poster to try to deter men from abusing/raping women (I don't know how effective this sort of tactic is, though), but the second statement is j… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/12 05:57 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter