TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

meco03211 Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by meco03211 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I bet it'd go something like this.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 10:26 PM
9

What vaccine has a success rate as low as 23%?
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:48 PM
3

Mike Huckabee's daughter.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:29 PM
3

That's not how intent is applied in a legal sense. They intend to put their mouth on the infant's genitals, whether or not they get sexual gratification out of it should be irrelevant. Trying to play the semantics card does nothing but cloud the argument that this is wrong and should be stopped.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 02:29 PM
7

If you washed their genitals with your mouth it would. There are much better and more sanitary ways to clean the blood. There's also the option of not doing it, but that's for another time.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 02:13 PM
4

Not sure if serious. It's actually MGTOW. Men going their own way. From my understanding it's a lifestyle choice of essentially avoiding any and all contact with all females in order to avoid things like this as well as false rape accusations and the like. Pretty sure they have a sub.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:50 PM
3

It's more to the point of lying about rape, blaming someone, and continuing the ruse despite knowing the consequences your victim could face. Understandably it could be difficult to prove intent to that degree, but I'm currently of the opinion that false claims with the intent to get someone incarcerated should carry the same punishment as the crime they are accusing the innocent person of.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:34 PM
3

They care about their bottom line. Banning milo would hurt the least in their calculations. That is all.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 06:58 PM
5

What they need to convict you of rape is for you to confirm you had sex with her. Even if you say it was consensual. If you admit you have sex, you admit that it happened. With the both of you agreeing sex happened, it's just up to her to say she didn't consent for it to be rape. As others have said, invoke your right to remain silent. Don't even plead your case to a detective hoping he will believe you. There's nothing you can say now to help you that you cannot say later. And there is plenty y…
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:44 AM
13

Those who spend more on weddings can afford the cost incurred by divorce. Divorce isn't free. That's one possible conclusion.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:59 PM
34

Source?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:55 PM
7

Where I'm from they are actual members of the police force. The university is their "beat" if you will.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 03:52 AM
1

They don't need a reason to arrest you too scan your body. They need Reasonable and Articulable Suspicion. This is a level of evidence below probable cause but above just a hunch or "gut feeling". This is the level of evidence needed to DETAIN you. There is a difference between a weapons pat down and a search. A weapons pat down they are not allowed to go into your pockets to look, they basically just have to pat down on top of your clothing. You are not allowed to resist this, and upon resistin…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:33 PM
19

Not saying it's right or wrong, but this is why a lawyer will advise you to not even apologize after any incident where your fault could make you liable for something (like a car accident). Apologizing gives at the very least the appearance of fault.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 09:22 PM
16

I took his comment to mean the court of public opinion wouldn't question her. Just my $0.02.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:04 PM
2

The problem i feel it's people that don't understand the system. I would assume the scenario would play out like so- 19.5 years after the fact the woman claims rape. Police investigate. When asked the man confirms sex did happen but swears it was consensual. The man had admitted he had sex with the woman so that is now a stipulated fact of the case. As far as consent, it is not up to the man whether she consented or not. And now he is convicted of rape.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:14 PM
3

So was the whole point of that interview to just make fun of the people complaining about Christina Hoff Sommers? There was nothing of substance for the entirety of that clip.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:28 AM
3

You mention legal rights and all, which is great, but sometimes they go beyond what is allowed legally. Just to keep aware of all possibilities.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:13 AM
1

Numbers are only as good as their assumptions. Those are some pretty wild assumptions. That's like when feminists say all men are rapists. That is a statement based off an assumption. It is a horrible assumption, so the statement holds no statistical weight.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:50 PM
7

Wrongly convicted AND raped, probably not. There's a lot of numbers involved for both of those.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 01:51 PM
1

She's going to have a hard time consoling herself with the millions of dollars she has. Poor girl.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:26 PM
9

In what country do we just presume people are innocent? That just sounds ridiculous. Pitchforks and mobs are where the real justice is at. /s
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:24 PM
34

Um. I imagine that doesn't work out in their favor. I know tons of guys that would wear dresses and/or heels just to get cheap or free drinks.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 12:22 PM
26

Suicide by cop is a tactic sometimes employed. Some people can't bring themselves to actually do the act themselves. So they reason if they put a cop in the position to need to kill them it's not really suicide. So yes it is possible he had a gun and pointed it at cops. It is very possible he threatened their lives. Whether he would have actually killed them or not starts to not matter when you have a gun pointed at you.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:40 PM
2

That will be on the table as well. Add I'm only 29 it can become an issue of whether or not the doctor wants to do something permanent. Also it helps to have more than one option.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:03 AM
35

I for one am ecstatic at the news of Vasalgel. That shit sounds awesome. I have my first routine visit with a doctor in years coming this Friday and you can bet this will be something I ask about. My gf and I do not want kids.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:50 PM
3

Troll account folks.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:23 PM
0

I'd argue that she is entitled to not want random interactions with strangers. I'm a bit of an introvert myself and I cringe whenever someone starts a conversation with me that I don't want.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:07 PM
4

That's not the point of the 24 hours. That 24 hours is literally in there in order to give them a grace period to change their mind. That doesn't include normal wait times expected of procedures. In essence you jump through all the hoops a normal procedure would require, then you are told to go home and think about it. Presumably you should have given at least the same amount of thought into an abortion as any other major procedure. This is just an added hurdle. An unnecessary hurdle.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:52 PM
8

You can be just as vapid and ignorant after turning 18.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:35 PM
19

Source?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 01:43 PM
2

To your last point, let's say that it does hold true for victims. That doesn't make the opposite extreme OK. Two wrongs don't make a right and they don't need to make up any lost ground as far as justice is concerned. That would be like saying it's OK to own white people as slaves since it's only fair because the pendulum swung the other way in the past.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:01 PM
1

I hope this is a sarcastic comment.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:58 PM
7

That wasn't too imply being mean to anyone, but you will on occasion find yourself in the awkward position of having to choose a side. Two people vying for the same bill or discrepancies over what the kids can eat. At some point you will have to make a decision that will upset someone. Choose wisely.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:30 PM
11

A bit of nit picking but please the one who is in control of the tip. Mostly is the person doing the tipping, but on rare occasions is not.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:27 PM
2

Jail should be for rehabilitation though. There's an old Chinese proverb or some shit like that which I will paraphrase. A trio of soldiers were walking on their way to morning drill when one of them asked "what's the punishment for revolting?" To which the others replied, "death." He then asked, "and what is the punishment for being late to drill? " again they answer with, "death. Why do you ask?" ... "Because we're late for drill." If you make the punishment for false rape accusations so sever…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:12 PM
7

All that information should be public record.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 03:47 PM
2

I believe it was along the lines of "It is better to let ten guilty men go free than to punish one innocent man." This is the basis of the court's presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 07:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter