TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mediainfidel Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by mediainfidel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The system is broken. This is not the fault of women. Thank you for stating this obvious truth. It's easy for us to get drawn into these sorts of issues and lose sight of the basic humanity intrinsic in the vast majority of every man and woman. In our social media-driven echo chambers, we tend to essentialize the Other, driving a narrative of conflict and moral grandstanding. There are terrible people like the lady in OP's clip who will take advantage of faults in any system. These people should…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 05:53 PM
3

I wasn't aware it was only homosexual pedophile priests in the Catholic Church that were a problem. From what I understand, there were female victims as well. While boys were the majority of victims, one in five were girls, which is far from nothing. I wonder how much of this belief that homosexual priests are solely responsible is rooted in anti-gay bigotry? I'm certainly not saying you have an anti-gay agenda, but the vast majority of media shaping our opinions on the matter seem to focus sole…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:24 PM
16

Is it possible that the prosecutors just wanted a conviction so that the insurance companies don't have to pay out. I certainly have no special knowledge of the details, but from the NY Times article OP shared, it appears she never admitted to killing him, only to that she "wanted him dead" and "felt good knowing he was going to die." Also, here's the final paragraph of the article: After Mr. Viafore’s body was found in the river weeks later, the medical examiner, in a decision that was met with…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:35 PM
0

If US anyifa is anything like EU antifa, then they are against anything and anyone except themselves No doubt, there's plenty of truth in that. Against the dominant social order, hard left libertarianism presents an unreachable "ideal" society (i.e., everything except Antifa) from which its most ardent proponents cast their criticisms, protest, and riot (not to mention over the years numerous Antifa "radicals" in the US have turned out to be police informants and/or agents provocateurs). As poli…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:12 PM
6

Also a prominent anti-feminist scholar who's name is escaping me right now, has said similar. Camille Paglia?
/r/MensRights23/04/16 04:24 AM
3

Thanks for this. I wish I scrolled down sooner before trying to make the point that the camera obviously shifts, which anyone can tell by focusing on the red wall to the left with the yellow and black sign on it. Clear as day, the guy is one lucky SOB but survived.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:53 AM
1

Added: it looks like another guy falls from above but is wearing the same clothes... Just look at the red wall to the far left with the yellow and black sign. Clearly the camera shifts on impact, creating the illusion of the guy being crushed. But once you notice the wall and the clearly shifting camera, there's no doubt this is the same guy.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:49 AM
3

if you watch the left side of the pics as you play them... Exactly. It's amazing how easily everyone misses the obvious shift of the camera because they are so focused on the man and impact, completely blind to the red wall on the left with the yellow and black sign which shifts on impact. Once you see it, there's no doubt this is the same person.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:45 AM
1

There's only one helmet. Look to the far left of the frame. Notice the red wall with a yellow and black sign on it. On impact (frame 111 to 112) the camera clearly shifts making it appear the helmet was crushed, but it's the same one.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:41 AM
3

You're making this more complicated than it needs to be. Simply look in the far left of the frame. There is a red wall with a yellow and black sign on it. The camera clearly moves on impact (frame 111 to 112). It's obviously the same guy. Lucky dude.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:38 AM
2

Thanks for posting this. What's more obvious to me is the red wall in the far left of the frame. It has a yellow and black sign on it. The camera shifts in the frames you've shown. It's clear from my perspective this is the same person and the impact moves the camera.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:34 AM
3

notice the camera gets moved... This is clearly what happens. Look at the reddish wall to the far left of the image, there is a yellow and black sign on it. The impact shifts the camera. It's the same person.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:30 AM
3

It seems to me - and you may disagree - that many women behave like this. I'm sure you could do the research, but it seems clear to me that women exploit, bully and still-up mobbing in the workplace and at home. To be honest, if you don't accept this I'd wonder if you've ever been in society at all - anyone who's ever been to school, work of any form of social-interaction would surely recognise this. "Many women behave like this"? Okay. Therefore, what? Women "exploit, bully" etc. Are you honest…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 10:08 PM
3

Yes, but again. There are many men leading the charge on these issues. Self-identified male feminists. I'd rather not make feminism equate with women. Feminists would love it if we would, even if in a negative equation. I'm with you on opposing feminist-led moral panics. Countless women are with you as well. Edit: Also, are you saying that since women led the charge of the Satanic Panic in Britain, therefore women led it everywhere? What logic are you actually using here? I'm afraid I simply don…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 06:58 PM
1

to 'Satanic sex abuse' in the 1990s During the 1980s and early 1990s there were many men involved in exacerbating the Satanic Panic I'm afraid. For example, let's not forget the book Michelle Remembers (1980), which initiated widespread fears and promoted bogus science like repressed memories, was co-written by Lawrence Pazder, who, as a psychiatrist and ostensibly honest investigator, did far more to legitimize the claims of Michelle Smith than Michelle ever did. While I get your point about ma…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 05:20 PM

I wonder where his wife got the idea that some men think women can't be soldiers /s Please show where VaginalBurp actually argued that women can't be soldiers. In the comment you are directly responding to here, VB starts by saying women can be soldiers and stresses that the problem is women meeting the requirements of front line combat, not to their abilities as soldiers in other capacities. You know this, yet you still chose to falsely claim VaginalBurp believes women can't be soldiers. Based …
/r/MensRights08/09/15 09:55 PM
-1

It's because men are objectified as working creatures whose purpose is to provide for them and their children. Yes, and I'm curious about the role evolution -- our nature -- plays in this. Men are also expected, and expect to protect women who provide them offspring. We are a sexually dimorphic species. Males are substantially more powerful than females. It's taken a long time to get there, millions of years of men protecting and often dying to protect women and their own children. In short: nat…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:13 PM
4

I'm not sure that lack of empathy with male penis mutilation is due wholly to women not having penises. No doubt a minor part, but I'm fairly sure that young man's mother and other female relatives have no problem being outraged about the actions taken by this violent woman. Men and women seem to have no problem empathizing with close relations of the opposite sex in any number of sex-specific areas, from childbirth to male circumcision. The more interesting question is, why is it so much easier…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:58 PM
6

Culture certainly plays a part. But I'm also curious as to how much this kind of behavior is influenced by biology, which it must be to some degree? The ease with which far-too-many women seem unwilling or unable to empathize with men, the ease with which they can laugh at such horrifying actions is disturbing to say the least, and is so broad and embedded through society that culture alone seems an insufficient explanation.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:38 PM
4

Just wanted to point out, this is University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC) and not the main University of Tennessee (UT) Yeah, I noticed how the author states that in the opening but then refers to UTC as UT throughout, even though the quotes he was using always use UTC. A minor confusion.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 12:32 AM
3

Why are you whining so much? You sound just like the progressives you so despise: "Woe is me, the lack of ideological purity is stifling, I need an echo chamber for my neo-reactionary walls of nonsensical text." Grow a spine and stand for what you believe or leave. But at least just stop with the whiny, conservative version of PC where persecution complex runs deep.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 03:24 PM
-1

If I was in a class called Introduction to Mass Communication and my professor started babbling about 'whiteness as a system of oppression' I'd file a complaint with the university too. Then hopefully you will remain silent when SJWs complain about hostile working environments. Get a spine and stop with this whiny nonsense about being offended.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:54 PM
4

After it passed by a 116-to-5 vote in New Zealand's parliament, Gareth Hughes, one of the four Greens MPs to vote against the bill, said it was overly broad and “risks limiting our freedom of expression”. **Edit: That was not meant to be a complete answer, just pointing out it's the only thing approaching a party "breakdown" of the vote in the article. Apparently, there are currently 14 Greens in the NZ Parliament. So, four of their legislators voted against it. I still haven't found where the o…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 06:33 PM
2

You're going to defend her no matter what Maybe it has something to do with Blond girl, black man? Some people's support, regardless of evidence, aligns more with one and not the other.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 04:36 PM
7

If we want to improve girl's and women's self-esteem we need to teach them to fight for their value like boys and men are taught. Western society already does that. Women get the best of both worlds. They will be praised for their accomplishments AND their genetic gifts far more so than men ever are or will be.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 05:36 PM
1

I'm sure similar laws could be applied Absolutely. This would be an obvious start. However, I don't think we could pass laws which would say officers accused of covering up their own misconduct by "misplacing" video evidence are automatically guilty of the crime they are accused of. While absence of video evidence might lead to charges being dropped against those accused, it can't lead to police being considered guilty unfortunately. I like the idea of an automatic, untamperable system. Though n…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:14 PM
8

We are not equal physically (height, weight, etc), intellectually (intelligence, interests, etc), or psychologically (emotional stability, etc), and we never will be. Not everyone will achieve the same outcome in life and that is the way nature intended it, as long as we ensure equal opportunity we are an ethical and just civilization. This transcends gender issues and applies to society as a whole. This point couldn't be more obviously true, that is if truth has any meaning. Besides, even if ev…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:33 PM
-1

I'm sorry but I fail to see how conservative Republicans are the answer. Men's rights is a progressive (i.e., forward-looking, new, contra-conservative) issue whether one wants to admit it or not. Besides, the Republican party did it's best to destroy the world economy. Economic disaster and depression make men's issues ultimately meaningless, or at least even more invisible than they currently are. Just because Republicans at least pay lip service to anti-feminism doesn't automatically make the…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:04 AM
0

We live in a world that is getting more and more violent. This actually appears to not be the case. Evolutionary psychologist Steven Pinker (The Blank Slate, How the Mind Works) has built a strong case against this very common refrain. In short, it's better to not trust one's intuition based on cultural messaging on this. What's needed is to actually look at the evidence. Here's a presentation by Pinker on his findings. It's well worth the hour and fifteen minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:23 PM
1

Many jurisdictions in the US have full-time Public Defender departments. The lawyers employed are salaried and work only local criminal defense cases. No doubt plenty departments are underfunded, overly-cynical, and poorly managed, but there are others which are competently operated within the scope of budgets provided. And herein lies one of the problems: with tax cuts the name of the political game these days, the allocation of needed funds for defense attorneys is near the bottom of prioritie…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:17 PM
3

This. Run away while you can. Run fast. After a child is born, the end.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:10 PM
4

I suppose you believe everything that a prosecutor says? Too many people have the tendency to follow this line. They are less likely to scrutinize the state while quick to condemn defense attorneys. I'm not sure about you, but if I had to choose....
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:02 PM
2

The explanation for women's poor performance is women's lack of desire to perform. Just to clarify your point, the vast majority (~99%) of people, men and women, lack any desire to attain a position of power like the US Senate. It's just that, of the tiny fraction who do, most are men. Also, wealth plays a prominent role. Most US Senators are already millionaires before running. However, as we all know, this is no barrier to women, because there are plenty women of wealth and prominence who coul…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:47 PM
7

I guess by MRA you mean any person who doesn't agree with your positions 100% of the time?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:56 PM
4

There are assholes in the world!? No way. I can't believe. So, rather than hold individuals responsible for their actions, the enlightened way to move forward is to blame an entire gender for the actions of a tiny few?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:58 PM
5

Although it's worth noting by this time the Soviets had kicked Japan off mainland Asia and were preparing their own invasion. I don't get the downvotes. You're absolutely correct. I guess there aren't too many historians here. There's plenty of reason to see the US use of atomic bombs against Japan as being the result of many considerations, not the least of which being sending a message to the Soviet Union (at the time America's ostensible allies but soon after their sworn enemies) and stopping…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:08 PM
0

Law, medicine, these professions and many others have majority female graduates now and started out with much greater gender bias than computer science. This is an excellent rebuttal to /u/DearAntarctica's valid contention about the social status quo, in which fewer women enter STEM due to cultural expectations and pressures rather than biological factors. However, as you point out, gains made by women in fields such as law and medicine -- not to mention many others -- contradict this socio-cult…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:30 PM
1

http://www.snopes.com/military/fonda.asp
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:00 PM
0

Also before you attempt to use the term "constructing a strawman" learn what it fucking means. I know what it means goof ball. The strawman is the phantom you're creating who says the nonsense you claim, which of course you are holding up to criticism for something only of your imagination. I hope you have the capacity to understand such depth of thought. You seem to be lacking in that regard. That being the case, you should stay out of such simple discussions.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/15 06:10 AM
10

Getting wet = breaking your face... right.... When did this happen in the video? Or are you simply constructing a strawman?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/15 05:24 AM
1

This is one of those moments you should mind your own business because you can easily ignore it. Yeah, that seems the reaction of the other passengers. Also, the person filming was clearly fascinated and likely amused by her solicitous behavior, which must have been going on some time before the video commences. However, the father's reaction was not completely out of bounds when considering her activities, which looks like soliciting prostitution. Not the time or place. Not to mention she could…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/15 06:24 PM
3

It's truly astonishing the amount of projection you're doing here. You hit it perfectly with /u/GetMeOffReddit . If it's not personal projection, it's easy to tell the projection is against some phantom strawman: And that girl was wearing fucking clothes. Full fucking clothes. Yeah, it's not a fucking burqha, would that make you happy? Go move to the middle east them. But you know what, you're just another one of those little fucking creeps that hang around these subreddits. To you, everything i…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/15 06:07 PM
3

Assholes who think that someone is evil for wearing clothing they chose out for themselves and for doing what they want in a non destructive way? Do you not realize that person on the bus was soliciting prostitution? Granted, I'm in favor of legalizing prostitution, but there is a time and place for everything. As /u/falkerman says above: Had she just stood there, or sat down, no one would have approached her. The prostitute's behavior on the bus was inappropriate. Now, perhaps the father's reac…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/15 05:59 PM
2

She sees video games as tools for social change and has set out to critique games that uphold patriarchal norms so that this relatively new and evolving media will be more inclusive for women and perpetuate fewer damaging stereotypes. Shouldn't the first goal be to show how such media "uphold patriarchal norms"? I mean, there seem to be many assumptions yet very little scientific proof. How exactly do video games influence behavior and attitudes? Do people simply copy what they see? Are they bla…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:55 PM
24

That's not entirely true. Hoff Sommers has other reasons for keeping the term feminist as a label for herself, which she describes here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XAftrligcc
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:13 PM
2

Before WW2 Public Relations was known as Propaganda. This is most certainly true, but bear in mind that the term propaganda also had a different connotation at that time. It was a value neutral concept, the negatives arising following the totalitarian regimes of the middle 20th century.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:49 AM
4

Just starting the article, but I find it interesting that not only rape dropped, but all types of crime. All types of violent crime have dropped since the early 1990s. It appears to be part of a much larger trend of lessening violence globally and throughout human history. (Source) There are many interesting theories for the most recent increases and subsequent declines of violence. But to me one of the most intriguing explanations which warrants further study is the notion that environmental le…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:25 PM
3

From Feminists. And for the most part they accept the accusations at face value, without verifying the charges for themselves. The feminist critics simply state such as truth and their loyal readers go along, outraged at a phantom.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:23 PM
15

THAT is hate, what the FRC said in the link is NOT hate. SLIGHT bigotry maybe, mostly backed by facts. Page 122 of this report from FRC states: Men account for almost all sexual abuse of children cases • An essay on adult sex offenders in the book Sexual Offending Against Children reported: “It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offences. Indeed, with 3,000 123 adult male sex offend…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 09:38 PM
6

This is normal, right? Obviously this behavior is far from normal and I don't think anyone is saying it is. Her actions certainly constitute sexual assault against a child. However, her psychological assessment might be accurate in that this anti-social behavior could very well reflect something other (worse) than pedophilia. A nasty sociopath regardless.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:35 AM
2

You're obviously, like most feminists, mistaking "equality" for "sameness." Men and women can be different yet equal under the law. Do you understand this simple distinction? Or has your reactionary blood boiled your braincells beyond the ability to reason?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 06:29 AM
9

Surely gender norms and culture is part of it. You are correct. There always seems to be such simplistic thinking when it comes to the nature vs. nurture question. People seem to assume it's all or nothing. Imagining the obvious, that culture interacts with, is informed by, and informs biology must be too complex for most thinking individuals to comprehend. As I see it the principle fallacy of feminist theory is that human culture is purely arbitrary and therefore fully mutable, a pliable mass w…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 10:22 PM
1

Talk about a victim complex you have. Please get over your suffering self and make something of life.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:23 PM
2

Well, except for any of his attacks against the Constitution. Rush? Silent when Bush does it; the end of the world is coming when Obama.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:54 PM
3

Zealous? Not really. A zealot is uncompromising in their positions. There's nothing compromising about the OP's article, including the quote by biffsocko. In fact, it's undoubtedly uncompromising in tone. So I'd agree that it comes across as angry and zealous.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 09:13 PM
5

Also, do women have no agency in your worldview? Seems you might be insinuating something along these lines because you deny their responsibility for any of the problems men face. Don't women play a massive role in raising boys to men? Don't women choose which males to reproduce with? Don't women hold power in various areas of life? Don't women yield some influence? Aren't there areas where women are privileged over men?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:45 PM
8

You are making an obvious mistake which demonstrates your true colors. These aren't men's issues because they are perpetrated by women against men, they are men's issues because they affect men. Tell me why it should matter what the gender of the perpetrator, or offending party is? You say these are problems everyone faces, yet you say women are not to blame. Don't women carry at least some of the blame for society's ills, or are all the problems in life the result of men?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:36 PM
4

Poe's law?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:16 PM
6

This sub has to be petty because they have no real issues to discuss. Certainly there are people in the Men's Rights movement which push a purely anti-feminist agenda with little focus on real problems affecting men. However, there are very important issue discussed here every day. Just to name a few off the top of my head: harsh prison sentencing, unfair family law outcomes, male rape and abuse, violence. There are many more. Any honest person looking at this sub even casually would recognize y…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:00 PM
1

This article is clearly conservative propaganda and a load of nonsense meant to work people up into a frenzy (oh no, the western world is crumbling!). It's simply confirmation bias for conservatives: see here's another liberal trying to destroy our culture. However, if you actually read deeper, here's more of what Vera Baird actually said: Last night, Mrs Baird denied she was trying to excuse crime and said it was the police themselves who were claiming a link between increased shoplifting and b…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:32 AM
2

It's also important that we recognize the hypodermic needle model of media influence has been proven false, a remnant of 1930s behaviorism. (Not that this is what you're arguing; I provide this point simply for clarity and perspective). People do not simply copy what they see in the media. Violence has become increasingly commonplace in our culture, yet actual violence has declined over the last few decades (increase in violent media, decrease in actual violence). Violent video games and televis…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:07 AM
4

Men's Rights groups don't exist simply to oppose feminists. Men face sexual discrimination in some areas of their lives and sometimes feminists are the cause or working to increase the problem. The only solution is to actively work against feminists in these areas. I think you're exactly correct here. The focus shouldn't be anti-feminism per se. The Men's Rights Movement exists because there are obvious and serious issues unique to men, in which an organized effort is needed to address most effe…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 12:30 AM
2

The fact of the matter is, we are very far from fully understanding such human behaviors. Speculations can be informative and useful, but one should never lose sight that they are just that: speculations. While great strides have been made we are nowhere near an understanding of human behavioral evolution and culture which would warrant a confident position one way or the other. (At least I think it wise to be careful and aware of our limited knowledge, particularly when it comes to these issues…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 07:46 AM
6

Maybe stuff like this is an instinctual behaviour as way of trying to control our population. Unlikely. If this were the case, we would expect to see such behavior in all densely populated areas. From what I understand this is not the case. While Japan's situation is mostly unique, it generally follows the same trend found in most rich post-industrial societies rather than simply overpopulated ones. With few exceptions relatively wealthy educated societies have lower birthrates regardless of pop…
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:34 PM
8

Good job Innocence Project. The state of Florida ruined this guy's life based on shoddy evidence.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 12:20 PM
3

Of course, a fantastic song. There are certainly others as well. "Within You Without You" "Long Long Long" "Taxman"
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:01 AM
10

They should have given Harrison more songs. Two of the most timeless Beatles songs are "Here Comes the Sun" and "While My Guitar Gently Weeps." When the band finally split, Harrison was relieved to be able to make more of his own music. Lennon and McCartney are rock/pop gods undoubtedly, with talent of the highest order. I'm just a firm believer that the Beatles would have been even better had they given Harrison more than the occasional song.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:13 PM
0

Trying to portray men as innocent victims who are hurt by the big bad women is not much better than what radical feminists do. I'm afraid this is a tendency MRAs will have to deal with. Humans over-moralize against their enemies. Nuance gets lost in these conflicts. It's no surprise some of the men here see the cause of Men's Rights not so much as against feminism as it is against women generally. Just like for many radical feminists the problem is men/masculinity, the evil in the minds of some …
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:34 PM
59

My guess is most of these critics -- from a very privileged position -- perceive misogyny and rape culture as mysterious, quasi-mystical forces acting through culture upon a society of blank slates. They imagine men as slaves to the Patriarchy® , incapable of resisting these evils without help (from "correct" thinkers like them of course). From their standpoint men must be re-educated, taught not to rape. So it doesn't matter what Dr. Phil's feelings about rape are, even if he condemns it in the…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:52 AM
1

I don't think your conclusions are justified until more information is given. First, do men use verbally abusive language more often than women? If so, how much more? Are some men incapable of changing this behavior? If so, how many? Are these numbers closer to the number of women unable to change? It's very possible more men use this kind of language for social reasons, and hence make the behavior more easily altered. While it's also possible most of the women who use abusive language might do …
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:53 PM
4

From what I can tell, there's nothing directly related to men's rights, but Elaine Morgan's aquatic ape "theory" does have something to say about science and feminism. She developed her ideas as a direct response to the dominant theories of the time, which she deemed to be sexist because they stressed the importance of hunting (a predominantly male activity) in the evolution of human intelligence. Morgan's primary motivation was feminism rather than scientific understanding. Though the ideas she…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:53 AM
6

Excellent response. I think the worst damage done by the feminist rape culture narrative and false accusations is in fomenting fear and distrust, unfairly painting half the population as violence prone predators. This event is a men's rights issue because, as you so eloquently point out, it demonstrates the level of dishonesty used by feminist activists in order to "prove" to the public at large the victimizer status of men/masculinity. The work you do at COTWA points to the horrible consequence…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:13 PM
3

This type of thinking is certainly not unique to feminists or "greater good" ideologies. Any and all ideological stances are prone to ends-justifying-the-means thinking. Everyone tends to over-moralize in areas of conflict and disagreement. We often question the moral and ethical motivations of our opponents, seeing them as driven by pure evil intent, out to destroy us just for the sake of doing so. They are sociopaths and haters. Thus we are justified in even the most outrageous actions taken a…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:54 PM
0

I wouldn't say it describes this subreddit per se, just some elements here. It seems all too easy for people to get caught up in a combative, winner-take-all attitude. Feminists become a caricature of ultimate evil, out to destroy men at all costs. There's no gray area. In my opinion, scoring points is a counterproductive strategy. Communication will prove much more effective in the long run. Playing games with idiotic feminists is going to do very little to inform the general public, who are al…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:24 AM
1

It's not too hard to imagine, but always be aware that science is a long way from fully understanding such human behaviors, at least not to the degree that we should then start founding our ideas and opinions about society and human nature based on such limited knowledge. Well that's a very simple understanding of things. I don't see how my quote is simple when it is warning about the complexity of human behavior. My statement is that we should be careful when making confident conclusions based …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:58 AM
2

It's not too hard to imagine, but always be aware that science is a long way from fully understanding such human behaviors, at least not to the degree that we should then start founding our ideas and opinions about society and human nature based on such limited knowledge. A major indicator statistically of whether someone will sexually abuse another person is whether the abuser was sexually abused themselves, not their DNA. Also, rates of rape (and violence more generally) have declined over tim…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:57 PM
1

"it's at least partially about sex." Sure. I never denied that. Simply the claim of "reproduction" being an obvious motive for rape.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:54 PM
2

Thanks. For what "Now, let’s take it a step further that just acknowledging the fact that using our brains forces us to concede that rape is, in fact, about sex and reproduction." I'm not saying he's right or wrong here but shouldn't he at least demonstrate why it's so obvious? At least I'm not so sure about the "reproduction" aspect of rape. What of homosexual rape and child rape? I see no reproductive advantage to such a thing. Maybe rape is a more complex phenomenon than both Elam and feminis…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:27 PM
-1

Great advice. Thank you for your helpfulness. Such an informative person you are.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:59 PM
6

Came here to say this. Not sure if the OP has or not, but if he hasn't taken even basic steps the court will not be very sympathetic to his pleas. There should be no reason to be denied visitation. Complaining about lawyer costs will be deemed an invalid excuse.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:24 PM
3

I would be interested in reading the full context. This language by Elam seems perfect evidence for the "hatred" of MRAs. It reads like a caricature written by feminists. Is Paul Elam really like this? I don't know this Paul Elam, but if this is his style, what the hell is he doing representing men's rights?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:12 PM
2

Some very good points here, particularly concerning the normalization of rape resulting from the rape culture narrative. But I find it a bit simplistic to blame "female" abusers for rape. The problem is abusers generally and the cycle of abuse they perpetuate. What makes these women abuse and rape children? Outside of possibly sociopathic outliers, I would put my money on them also being abused/raped at the hands of others, women and men, and so on. That being said however, I do agree we as a so…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:08 PM
2

I understand that there may be a boys club up there, but it’s always been my ambition to join it not whinge about it! Here's something never mentioned when feminists rage about positions of power being male dominated: the vast majority of all people, men and women, never seek or even want these positions. Normal people have better things to do in life.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:13 PM
3

No need to apologize. Your argument is much more focused. It's very difficult however to demonstrate exactly how media representations impact the public consciousness. No doubt they do. But in which way there is no scholarly consensus. I would instead recommend focusing on news media representations rather than films, entertainment TV, or advertising. Your best arguments might be found looking into those cases where men are falsely accused of rape, reports of so called "rape culture," news stori…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:40 PM
3

Which is why I'm asking for events related to heterosexual American males being discriminated. Men's rights is far more than heterosexual male rights. Are you looking for examples of American men being discriminated against because they are heterosexual, or because they are men? Heterosexual men suffer injustice rarely due to their sexual orientation, but rather because they are male. The majority of the population is heterosexual, but that is incidental to men's rights.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:04 PM
1

Look. Here's what you're overlooking. The gap in suicide between men and women cannot fully be explained in terms of men simply being more effective in their attempts (because of their more violent nature?). Following your argument one would expect the difference to remain static, but the gap changes drastically over time and geographically. For example, it's no surprise suicide rates for all people increase in times of economic stress. But looking at the change in the U.K. since the latest rece…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:53 PM
1

How did the researchers determine what constituted a suicide attempt?
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:14 PM
2

As many or more men die from suicide than there are women who attempt suicide. All feminists I've discussed this with state the opposite, claiming more women attempt suicide than men, just that men (because they are more violent?) are more successful. There are "studies" and some stats they can provide, which is all that's needed to wipe their hands clean of this issue, moving right along with the patriarchy train. Long after the fact, we are then left to sift through these studies, which are al…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:44 PM
2

This is an important point to remember. People tend to see their own time in history as somehow special, often leading to this perspective of an overall decline in culture.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 11:07 PM
1

These reasons, if true, make responding in a civil manner all the more important.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:45 PM
2

This is the primary point. Other ideas need to enter into the discourse, and a good way of doing that is challenging the parts of contemporary feminist ideology one finds problematic or faulty. The nature of our communication system as it exists now allows for a social peer review of sorts. It matters less whether one's ideological opponents respond, or whether they resort to slander, particularly if you focus on their ideas and attendant claims and prescriptions rather than their personal motiv…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:26 PM
3

I lived in South Korea for four years and this doesn't surprise me. There's a powerful, over-bearing pressure on young men to achieve near-impossibly high levels of financial and social success. Young men (but almost never young women) are expected to not only provide for their parents in old age but are also expected to marry into an equal or higher social class and to provide an economically better life for their partners and children. Never should a man's wife earn more, even as women are gai…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:04 AM
3

Yeah. I had to get an FBI background check for my job, and some stupid arrests from when I was 19 showed up even though the charges had been dropped. Like I said before though, every state (and municipality) has different rules. Some charges are automatically dropped from your record after some time, even if convicted. For example, I had a marijuana conviction, but a law was passed at some point in the state I was living (GA) which after a given period of time, any one-time conviction for misdem…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 08:38 AM
6

In some US states arrests/charges without conviction will show on a background check. Each state has its own rules concerning this. Sometimes it's only felony charges regardless of conviction that will show. Some states don't release non-conviction info, while others require special request beyond standard checks.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 03:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter