TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

medpacker Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by medpacker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's women. Men only appear to cause more accidents because because they are significantly more responsible for the total hours driven - it's just the wage gap argument all over again.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 04:51 PM
1

Ironically, it is misandry that is baked into academics, as boys get worse grades than girls, even when performance is equal; and guess who is grading lower? Yep, female teachers. Guess which gender gets more support? Yep, it's female.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 02:55 PM
18

I bet you wouldn't afford the same criticism to TwoX, which does it much worse.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 06:19 AM
7

Let me guess: women were considered property, couldn't own property, couldn't work, couldn't vote and their husbands were allowed to rape them? Yeah, for historical revisionists. The truth is much less kind to the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 05:08 AM
1

They did, if they weren't married. In marriage, women were not considered to own property, but this doesn't mean they didn't have almost all the benefits of property anyway. Back then marriage meant that a man had a legal obligation to support his wife, and thus he legally controlled the assets and was the breadwinner. He was almost like the sole "legal entity" so to speak, and could even be held responsible for his wife's actions. You can find more info with a little bit of research.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:15 AM
1

"The production, sale, distribution, and commercialization of child pornography in Japan is illegal under the Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the Protection of Children (1999),\1]) and is punishable by a maximum penalty of five years in prison and/or a fine of ¥5,000,000.\2]) Simple possession of child pornography was made illegal by an amendment to the act in 2014.\1]) Virtual child pornography, which depicts wholly-fictional characters,…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 09:52 AM
1

I'm gonna need a serious source on that because everything points to it not being true at all. There are still many such commercial products being produced and sold both in physical retail shops and online. Not just sold either, but openly created and published on sites like Pixiv. It doesn't make sense to ban it from sale while allowing that, either.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 02:18 PM
1

Depictions of "underage" drawings are not illegal in Japan, though. They're sold pretty openly.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 03:50 AM
3

No, it doesn't. Voluntary celibacy requires exactly one decision, the person who wants to be celibate deciding to be so. You don't need another person's consent to abstain from sexual relations. Obviously you need some form of added influence when it comes to the concept of something being involuntary, as not being a volunteer automatically implies a lack of consent or acceptance and thus the influence that makes it so must be in existence. This doesn't inherently have anything to do with agency…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 02:06 PM
4

No, you've got it wrong. You're ignoring that "involuntary" isn't standing on its own but directly in relation to celibacy. Involuntary celibate. Let's review the definition of celibacy: "a person who abstains from marriage and sexual relations" So involuntary celibate would be someone who does not choose to abstain from marriage and sexual relations, but still cannot acquire them. That is all. If you try to have sexual relations but continuously fail, then you are an incel.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 01:21 PM
1

That study was indeed retracted. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022146515595817
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:24 AM
1

That study was flawed. https://www.reddit.com/r/UnpopularFacts/comments/qnp5qh/the\_claim\_men\_leave\_their\_sick\_spouse\_more\_is/
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:22 AM
5

Fathers are discouraged by their lawyers from seeking custody. Also keep in mind that custody can be sole, joint or equal, and the default should probably be equal. Having joint custody could mean just once a year visitation for all its worth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDTHFjLaB-c
/r/MensRights19/06/23 04:25 AM
7

"MRAs making believe that courts are biased against fathers when it comes to custody, when men who seek custody of their child receive it half of the time." Well duh. Men have to SEEK the custody and dispute, spending tens of thousands of dollars and possibly years in court, women just get it by default. No bias!
/r/MensRights19/06/23 03:23 AM
11

"If you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole." Prove it. Justify this logic with facts.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:21 AM
-2

Debateable? No, it's not debateable at all.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:42 AM
10

Because if it was the vulva instead of boobs it would have been even more outrageous. It makes a point that for boobs it already meets with insane backlash, but present an even worse situation where the victim is a man and still no one bats an eye.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:41 PM
1

Perhaps you may want to consider reading the comment that you're replying to before typing up a message that addresses absolutely nothing in it.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 06:52 AM
2

Damn he broke her cognitive hard. You could tell she was pissed. I wonder if she learned a valuable lesson.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 12:27 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 02:58 PM
3

"Because males are the default sexual aggressors" HAHAHAHAHAHA no.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter