TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

megatuxracer Archive

View 1 post and 136 comments by megatuxracer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

megatuxracer/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:37 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

This was an extremely dishonest article. If the author wanted to find what is wrong witih the MRM, she could have found several honest criticisms.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 05:21 PM
–

Their science reporting isn't really science. It's "check out these cool experiments you can do with stuff lying around the house!" Calling what they write science is like calling Perez Hilton a sociologist.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:27 AM
3

It's not exactly a scientific discussion.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:26 PM
–

Is upper cutting them a requirement?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:52 AM
–

They said in so many words what amounts to "too bad".
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:17 AM
2

Perhaps we are talking about a different post. I am referring to the OP of the entire thread. The one by lurveduck, not cleo.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:14 AM
3

Or namedrop Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:30 AM
–

It's not even that she (he?) was misrepresenting GWW's views. She couldn't even figure out what GWW's angle is. It's not a huge secret: she has two sons for whom she is worried and she simply finds the sexism against men to be wrong.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:28 AM
–

I totally and completely agree with this. However, in general, female psychology is very different from male psychology and vice versa. As such, we should allow our conduct to reflect that. Again, remove the generalizations and it gets more complicated, but the essence of that principle applies. To be clear, this paradigm of women and men being in all of the same places at the same time is relatively new. We need to figure out a nice balance for men and women rather than what feels best for wome…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:44 PM
–

I find it interesting that the OP of the entire thread can't figure out GWW's angle. It's no secret, and she is incredibly outspoken about it.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:25 PM
2

Yeah she creeps me out too, but let's look at reality in its full context. These ideas are few and far between among feminists.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:24 PM
–

If that's your opinion, that's fine. I happen to have a different one. And it isn't quite so cut-and-dry as the generalities we are speaking in. When you talk about it on the micro level, there are a lot of problems with women being treated preferentially.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:19 PM
–

The workplace for one. And it's not just that it's preferential, but women entering the workplace required an adjustment in attitude to account for the fact that it was no longer a man's world.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:14 PM
–

I honestly don't think we're anywhere close to these ideas becoming reality.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:16 PM
–

You can easily restrain someone without uppercutting them. With the force he hit her with, he was putting her at risk for severe neck injuries. There were several different ways he could have handled that situation better. However, I do not agree with her getting the slap on the wrist. I think both should be punished, her more severely than him. To be clear, he had every right to use force in response. He just used too much in the wrong way. We can sit here and talk about gender equality and if …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:14 PM
–

You know, certain areas I gets why women would be entitled to different behavior from men. However, it's getting really ridiculous how men simply aren't allowed to be men anymore because women want to be women.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:37 PM
–

At first my thoughts were, "Well his response was rather disproportionate, so I can see why they would fire him." But charging him with assault and her with disorderly conduct? That's fucked.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:56 PM
0

She never struck me as a particularly pleasant woman.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:28 PM
–

It's a definite start in the UK. The article was extremely biased though.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:23 PM
5

It would help to know which State this is.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:18 PM
2

Because, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6knB1V8PxY
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:14 PM
4

Ends the story: "We should have an equal pay law." Remember that Florida woman who died because she didn't get up from the couch for years, and her ass literally fused to it? That's what will happen with my hand and face before I stop facepalming over this one.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:04 AM
1

For one, depending on the organization, your boss may not even have any obligations. However, going over your boss's head for anything is a potential can of worms you're opening. Invariably, people in authority over you do not like being subverted by you. This could cause problems for you later on, and you won't be able to prove it. There's always a way to justify an action, be it a bad review, you not being promoted, etc. As long as HR takes care of it, there is no need to do anything else. If …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:39 AM
–

That and it's likely that his boss wouldn't be fired for it. There will always be a bias against him when bonus time, raise time, and promotion time arrive.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:34 AM
1

I don't think it's directed at all men. And when a person suffers that kind of abuse from a parent at that early of an age, it is extremely common for the child to associate negative things from the whole gender of that particular parent for the rest of their lives. I will agree that she's still touched in the head. It's understandable though. It sounds like she, her brother, and her mom went through hell and back again.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:36 PM
13

As a straight guy I don't like it when women do this. In fact, I have had both men and women criticize the way I dress while touching me, and it does make me extremely uncomfortable--not just because they are touching me in places I would prefer them not to, but because I like the way I dress.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:05 PM
–

I would not advise him to tell his boss's boss. That could complicate things for him severely. OP, make as little noise as possible while still getting the problem taken care of.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:59 PM
3

"I don't feel comfortably with making sexist remarks."
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:31 PM
7

Keep in mind that the longer you're pregnant, the mor oxytocin you and the child will release. During birth, you and the child will both release a lot of oxytocin. What will probably end up happening is that you will either not want to give the baby up or will give the baby up and will regret it later. It's extremely emotionally stressful to go through with it and then just give up the child. It's a huge investment on your part with zero payout.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:48 PM
4

She contradicts herself all over the place! It's incredible. I mean the evidence is highly suspect, but at the same time...innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:40 PM
3

Well feminism is supposedly egalitarian, but they seek to achieve this by ending the oppression against women and then magically men's issues will disappear because patriarchy. The MRM rejects patriarchy theory and instead substitute the idea that there is simply a scale of privileges vs. discriminations for each group. We believe the benefits for men are less than women and that the discriminations for men are greater than women. I am personally egalitarian, but I don't think men are going to g…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:15 PM
8

Oh god a penis! They could have been raped!
/r/MensRights04/11/12 02:43 PM
–

Handsome, good-looking, or dapper would be appropriate. Sexy inherently implies sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:38 AM
–

Because the child is "well under 13." "Sexy" is not the appropriate way to compliment any child at that age ever from anyone.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:28 AM
1

You assume they haven't tried exactly this.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:06 AM
1

Just glance at first to get it out of your system. I mostly just ignore the ones who have them on display that get uncomfortable when someone actually looks.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:00 AM
–

This actually creeps me out quite a bit.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 05:55 AM
3

I wasn't aware that this is a competition.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 09:22 PM
1

I am confused as to why the lawsuit is happening now.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 09:16 PM
0

I will have to google it.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:59 PM
–

What do you expect from the Huffington Post? They don't slant left--they lay down.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:45 AM
–

That was probably the worst opinion piece I have ever read.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:00 AM
1

While I agree with you that this type of thing might encourage fathers to abandon their children, what is there to stop them from doing so today? When you look at the rights of fathers, it is entirely too easy for the mother to unilaterally strip the father of his right and financial investment to being part of his child's life, thereby rendering the point moot. We see this rather prevalently within society. Furthermore, regardless of child support payments or not, men are being forced to financ…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:56 PM
5

Well we are a large church. Welcome!
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:46 PM
2

I would be interested in seeing where he got this list from, but according to that list, yeah.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 11:13 PM
3

This justification is like saying that we should remove the tonsils from all newborns because they might get tonsillitis. There is one benefit of circumcision that isn't mitigated by diligence of contraception and hygiene: penile cancer. However the risks of penile cancer is so low regardless that the benefit of circumcision hardly justifies the removal of the foreskin. As for the Judeo-Christian beliefs, you have to look at the context under which that particular law was issued. Yes, wandering …
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:26 AM
2

It wasn't NOW. It's Because I Am A Girl. Essentially, it asserts that if we empower girls in the third world, they will buy a cow, which will magically multiply into a herd, leading to a business, and economy, clean water, enterprise, industrializations, skyscrapers, lasers, satellites, etc. because THIS ONE GIRL used her mad vagina powers to bring prosperity to her village. This is literally what a video on their website states. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WIvmE4_KMNw…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:45 AM
8

Because people are simply not aware that it exists.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 11:13 PM
–

Oh I thought you were referencing the conversation. Yeah the law is pandering. It's bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:21 PM
4

Not in Texas. In all forms of communication, if one party is aware of it, even if they are the one recording, it is legal. In all recordable media in all forms of communication, this is legal.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:19 PM
–

I am saying that just because a federal representative from Texas had to be politically correct in order to keep her job. That's not just pandering. Was there some pandering? Yes. However, if you look at the circumstances, she did not have to afford him the interview because he is an obscure graduate studies drop-out from a relatively obscure university representing an obscure movement that has barely gone from Internet discussion to feet-on-the-ground activism. He is covered in obscurity from h…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:16 PM
–

The ironic thing is that a feminist psychological article recognized that there is such thing as reverse sexism. Well, to be entirely precise, they said "reversal of sexism".
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:43 PM
–

That's a bit presumptive. I don't think it's entirely pandering, but i would agree that she had to protect her own ass in her own self-interest.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:42 PM
3

Yes your rhetorical device is very amusing.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:41 PM
–

Well from what I gathered from the videos, it seems as though the Title IX Officer he interviewed was very ashamed of the fact that there is this level of injustice.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:11 PM
1

On a different note, it's funny the amount of infighting in the comments.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:16 PM
1

Xpost from another thread on the same article: I read this as a guy who was an MRA simply because he was bitter, and he failed to address serious issues with feminism. "Patriarchy hurts men too." Yes, but patriarchy isn't really a sound theory, is it? If feminism really did recognize that it isn't quite that simple because sexism against both sexes exists all over the place and that men really do need a voice (that we aren't getting) then the MRM has nothing to stand on. For that one account of …
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:06 PM
–

I read this as a guy who was an MRA simply because he was bitter, and he failed to address serious issues with feminism. "Patriarchy hurts men too." Yes, but patriarchy isn't really a sound theory, is it? If feminism really did recognize that it isn't quite that simple because sexism against both sexes exists all over the place and that men really do need a voice (that we aren't getting) then the MRM has nothing to stand on. For that one account of going from the MRM to feminism, I have seen cou…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:04 PM
–

It's a directive from the Department of Education. Even if they wanted to, there's not much they can do about it.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:12 PM
–

A lot of it depends on simply knowing how to fight. This isn't only how, but the brain simply learns that it is capable of telling your muscles to respond with the maximum force possible. I have seen a 100 pound scrawny girl take down an absolutely ripped 6'5" all-American decathlete simply because she knew how.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:09 PM
–

Where's the one with a lone woman that said, "When I saw him at the club, I didn't drug his drink, take him home, tie him to the bed, and mount him--I backed off."
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:38 AM
1

Yes, and the official line for feminism is that this applies to men too. However, they don't like to focus on male rape a lot. For one, the statistics that have come out about male rape put the figure far lower than women. Second, feminism is still under the assumption that men are privileged over women because they place less value on the ways by which women are privileged. For example, the right to work has never been a right for men--it has always been an obligation. Meanwhile, as a white man…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:35 PM
1

This is an interesting angle to take it from. I think I will use this.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:50 PM
2

I agree. I expressed my disappointment above.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:50 PM
–

I didn't pay attention to your wording. There is either an ignorance of the movement's existence and--because they believe feminism actually has an eye out for gender equality--therefore the MRM is not necessary or they have heard of the MRM as a movement of misogyny that wants to return to the repression of women. The former usually scoffs at the idea that feminism does not really look at men's issues accurately.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:49 PM
–

I believe that he stated that he was a feminist, sir.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:13 PM
2

Yeah it's basically a self-contained system that is asserted by influence.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:13 PM
1

Except that the feminists in the debate used it, and there was no addressing of that.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:11 PM
–

Essentially. They completely miss the context through which the MRM exists, and they continue to look at gender issues from a gynocentric perspective in all cases. For 3, they honestly believe that feminism is actually taking men's issues seriously, so they actually look at it through the feminine lense by proxy of 1 and 2.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:10 PM
–

Honestly, that is what feminism is, though they hide behind this label of egalitarian.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:07 PM
4

Thinking back, I find it incredibly disturbing the sentiment that the feminists in the room held. I especially found it disturbing that there were three instances of women not understanding why we should talk about false rape statistics because it might scare actual rape victims into not reporting their rape. More disturbing than that was that one of the girls in there--caked in makeup and dressed the the nines--did not believe that male rape was possible. These are the premier gender studies st…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:39 PM
–

Hypergamy is the phenomenon of women leaving men for bigger and better things. Often it happens when the husband's social status falls beneath that of the woman. There is contention as to how serious of an issue this is within the MRM, but it does happen.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:11 PM
2

Can't go there. That said, they at one point conflated the already conflated 1-in-4 women in college are victims of rape or attempted rape into 1 in 4 women in college will definitely be raped. Given this, I don't know the difference between facts and what they call "actual facts".
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:59 PM
–

Oh I misheard. Okay that's not really terribly offensive. I would still contend that it is out of taste.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:48 PM
–

It's a telling look at female psychology in relation to hypergamy. It's important to understand what's going on if we are to understand what the issue is.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:32 PM
2

It's the idea of explicit visibility versus implicit invisibility. Men had explicit power in all aspects of life, but women had a lot of implicit power. Case in point, women are more valuable as a reproductive imperative. In areas like chivalry, women commanded great power. Men were there to serve her every whim. The entire power structure that men set up was around protecting women, I would argue. So women benefited greatly in many ways from this phenomenon, but certain women do not view this a…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:08 PM
1

It doesn't make the response any less valid. By that I mean, their response was genuine. It wasn't simply them being offended.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:56 PM
–

Can we please stop documenting every single potentially misandric thing anyone ever says on any website? It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:52 PM
3

Joke: patriarchy--or the express subjugation, repression, and discrimination of women for the benefit and power of men. It is a scientifically and historically falsifiable theory that states that women were and are oppressed by the iron fist of masculine dominance. Any gender difference is fed through it, and when certain ones inevitably get stuck, new concepts are made up--like benevolent sexism--in order for the difference to fit. As a result, men's issues are ignored until they can be put int…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:36 PM
–

Among feminists, it is always "men don't face discrimination"; "men face discrimination, but there are more important women's issues"; or "men face discriminations every day and it is a problem and I am a feminist and there's nothing wrong with feminism and if you want to change it so much then you should do something about it and you should probably join feminism!" And they all hate the MRM. How does one do something about it when ones efforts to do something about it are stymied by all feminis…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:25 PM
–

Overall he didn't do a good job. I would have been harping on patriarchy like crazy.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:01 PM
–

I noticed the opposite. The MRAs gave very concrete facts overall and the feminists gave sort of fears of potential possibilities to affording men a say at the table. Same old stuff: if it might negatively affect a woman, throw it out. I was extremely disappointed by the MRA telling the male feminist, "I hope you get raped mate." Disgusting.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:41 PM
3

Agreed, but the sentiment I hear from feminists is "this isn't an issue," "it's an issue that isn't as important as issues women face every day," and "well it's an issue, so man up and do something about it." It's not as easy as just doing it when these gender biases get in the way of getting the word out. Nobody wants to hear it or they refuse to help spread the word.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:55 AM
0

Out-group gender biases dude. It affects everything.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:52 AM
-1

They're reporting actual data. This isn't sexist--it's reality. However, if filtered through patriarchy theory, the implications of this is that this is sexist against women because men expect them to do all of the work or some other such bullshit. This article says nothing of the sort though.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:49 AM
0

It's an independence of self to define ones own self.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 08:22 PM
6

I am finding the same thing. They are not eliminating every variable, and they are using isolated incidents to make probabilistic assertions.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:10 PM
2

It's amazing because in the executive summary, they deny that the pay gap has anything to do with occupational choice. I am still reading though, and I will post with my own findings.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:51 PM
1

The horrors those ladies at MU are going through...
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:30 PM
1

That wasn't sexist at all. I'm confused.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:26 PM
6

Interesting because I can't get a straight answer out of individual feminists as to what feminist is. They can't even agree on whether or not it's an ideology or a movement.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:00 AM
2

You should drop the term "hypoagency" if you end up sending something else.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:54 PM
1

In response to your example in part A, mugging of an intimidating and violent nature often happens quickly in a public space or in a secluded space. What we are talking about here is a public space. The instance of rape being described is also presumably of a covert nature. When one traditionally thinks of mugging, one thinks of a violent or otherwise intimidating attack. However, that's not the case here. Furthermore, to maintain the covert nature of the rape, the perpetrator would not be able …
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:43 PM
–

At far lower rates. Breast cancer is, primarily a woman's issue. A more salient issue is that prostate cancer does not receive proportional funding to breast cancer, and that is a very big issue.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:35 PM
–

From the male perspective--at least my own--if someone gropes you or rapes you covertly in a public space and you want to stop the problem, it is unreasonable to suggest that one remains powerless as a woman or threatened by an Oscar-winning display of alerting others to the situation. It's not victim blaming at all to state post hoc that a.) the victim in these situations had power, not to prevent the abuse, but stop the abuse and b.) that it is their fault in part that the refusal to stop the …
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:23 PM
–

You wouldn't say it's abuse, but you want it to stop? What would it be if it is not abuse and why do you want it to stop? If you will allow me to indulge in my intuition, you don't view it as abuse because you feel empowered by your views and the information you arm yourself with. However, one cannot deny that your mother is using her own authority and opinions to repress your own opinions. You are being punished for doing nothing wrong, and you feel unjustly treated. Rightfully so. However, if …
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:29 PM
15

I couldn't get through the entire article, but I honestly don't expect anything else from that thing they call a news publication.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:16 PM
5

Yes. I also notice that there is literally no barrier for anyone seeking entry. The department of computer science here is constantly looking for people to declare an IT-related major. There aren't very many women, but the ones that are here are not treated unfairly or as a lesser person. Otherwise, it's a pretty good melting pot of ethnicities.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 07:12 AM
16

Well if we're realistic, there aren't a ton of MRAs. I mean I don't think this is an inequality of opportunity rather than an accurate representation of sample sizes.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:58 PM
3

This is the first step, honestly, and I would like to commend you on what you're doing. This is exactly the type of stuff the MRM is working towards. I would suggest that you seek counseling, life coaching, or therapy. It sounds like what happened to you is far beyond what we are capable of offering. The best I can offer is support, love, and understanding. One thing that has helped me a lot is called the Benson-Henry Institute Cognitive Restructuring Tool. Essentially it's designed to identify …
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:50 PM
6

I go to a university with a very large black population. There aren't any barriers based on your race. If you have the grades and the financial means, there should be no problem.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:33 PM
1

Random idiot on tumblr writes mindless drivel. News at 11!
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:11 AM
1

Title IX and VAWA are two laws. Rape laws are not entirely inclusive to men or totally exclude men. Honestly I am new to the MRM and am not fully educated on the specifics, but I can tell you that from what I have seen, your views align with mine.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:34 AM
5

I laughed so hard at this. Yeah it's not strictly s men's rights issue, but the hypocrisy is still funny.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:29 AM
–

The difference is that a lot of Howard Stern's guests happen to be strippers and porn stars.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:14 PM
-1

Malcolm X wasn't part of the Civil Rights Movement. He was a black supremacy advocate.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:41 AM
0

Right but at what point do her wishes not to discuss her boobs come into play?
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:51 AM
–

If you stopped having this awful knee-jerk reaction and actually read her tumblr post, you would know that she expected men to act this way and even went along with it for the most part. It wasn't until the interviewer went overboard (we both agree on this) that she was up in arms.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:37 AM
–

By this logic, covering up and dressing plainly reduces oneself to being boring and plain. It also predicts that wearing blue jeans and a band t-shirt reduces that person to a fan of that band and possibly depressed, though the jeans are open to interpretation.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:35 AM
0

Yes it happens everywhere. However, you act as though the interviewer somehow wanted to court her or something. And social gatherings have different constructs and contexts that define acceptable behavior. For example, I am not going to have a meeting at a funeral. Yes, attraction happens everywhere. Yes, women put themselves on display to attract men. Yes, this is intentional. I understand as well. However, she made clear her actual wishes with no ambiguity, and they persisted. Think about it l…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:32 AM
–

What I am saying is that, yes even whores, are people. As they are people, they should be treated accordingly. And if we want to talk about what she is dressed like, it's a sexualized comic book character. I don't know what you're talking about when it comes to "[activating] male sexual instinct" when I have never seen cleavage and started mobbing the girl about her tits nor have I had an impulse or compulsion to do so. In my more than five years in college, I have not seen anything of the sort …
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:01 AM
3

I believe that all people have the right to insist on being viewed as more than the size of their breasts, fitness of physique, or any other sexualized physical attribute. I don't think it's wrong to notice and point out such things when they are on display, but to ignore the person within that body is disgusting. I stand with her in her indignation.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 12:15 AM
–

The fallacy is in the reduction of an individual to terms much simpler than he or she is. If you would allow it, I would like to modify my original statement to say, "she cannot be logically reduced to something as simple as her boobs, their size, and how they look without the costume on." If, to start the interview, the interviewer said something along the lines of, "Wow! You look so sexy in that outfit, and you have fantastic boobs," while also asking her questions about why she chose that cha…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 12:09 AM
–

They apparently didn't cover the period of time in which the Civil Rights Movement took place in your "history" lessons in school. To be a bit more explicit, an isolated outbreak over racial persecution does not equate to an organized movement that began decades later.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:59 PM
–

Oh please. Two totally different situations. If we want to look at something closer to home, the Civil Rights Movement was a peaceful movement. The end of apartheid in South Africa was a peaceful movement. Those would be accurate analogies to what we're facing here. I don't quite know why the MRM is so infatuated with using analogies to Nazi Germany to describe what men in developed nations are experiencing right now. Just because a few fringe radfems advocate the genocidal descruction of the ma…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:10 PM
1

I think that recognizing that one is a victim is important when that person is actually a victim. I agree that there is a stigmatization of victimhood, and that isn't right. What is important is what one does with victim status. Does one continue to be a victim when one accepts victimhood or do they learn, heal, and move on?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:58 PM
–

Tell that to Gandhi.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:51 PM
–

Right it was. However, regardless of what the costume is, she cannot be reduced to something as simple as her boobs, their size, and how they look without the costume on. If we use the logic in your argument, the costume enhanced her entire body, yet the source of their focus was her boobs, not her entire physical appearance. The idea that women who dress up in a sexual way should not be viewed sexually is not valid in my estimation, however I don't believe they should be viewed as only sexual. …
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:01 PM
–

I think there is something to be said about the sheer projection of sexualixation that the guys there perpetrated. According to her, they mentioned nothing of herself or why she chose the character and instead focused on her breasts. I know that if a female presenter came up to me and focused solely on my body, I would have responded similarly.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:29 PM
1

I thought it was hilarious. Write a couple of poems of your own.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:13 PM
1

Except in the MRM. I don't really like projecting my values on others' personal desires.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:30 AM
1

I don't think being wary of strangers is necessarily a bad thing, but I am also wary of ALL strangers that give me a bad feeling--men and women. I have seen many accounts of women saying that they are particularly wary of men since men are rapists. Furthermore, the rhetoric that feminists like to propagate about rape do not exclude men these women trust. Your boyfriend? Might rape you. Your dad? Might rape you. Your husband? Might rape you. Your brother? Might rape you. Your friend? Might rape y…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:29 AM
–

It wouldn't be policing others' thoughts to point out that this is fallacious since it specifically targets men when women are just as capable of rape. This is a rhetorical device to implant the seed of thought that that man over there might kidnap you and rape your ass until you prolapse. It is meant to shame men and strip women of their feeling of safety and empowerment.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:22 PM
–

Ah, but you see, hindsight is always 20/20.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:19 PM
–

That's silly. You see that poor girl that you raped (and you did rape her because you had sex with her) could never do wrong. Ever.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:44 PM
4

I wouldn't argue that.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:36 PM
–

If he can prove that the accounts are his she holds no claims to his money period. They were not married, so what is his remains his. The joint account might be a bit nebulous. As for custody, I am not sure. I haven't the faintest how she got the other accounts frozen.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:26 PM
-2

To the best of my knowledge, men's rights doesn't exist as an academic discipline. Perhaps male psychology or male child development or something like that.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:25 PM
–

You could try some sort of American studies degree with a focus on human or male rights.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:45 AM
3

This is your personal space. It is for you to use in a way that makes you feel comfortable.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:31 AM
–

Incensed is not even close to how angry this makes me.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:01 AM
27

The arguments that feminists faced with incontrovertible evidence that contradicts their own assertions of "you just don't get it" is an emotional argument based on cognitive dissonance. Essentially, based on the preponderance of evidence being presented to them their whole lives, they correctly make the emotional conclusion that what they are doing is right and just. However, when someone else comes along with evidence to the contrary, that is emotionally invalidating to them. In her wont to do…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:19 AM
5

To me, the official feminism is a movement whose sole purpose is promoting the rights and privileges of women wherein remedies to social stigmatization and legal oppression of men are mere means to a feminine end. As long as the activism that is promoted towards men (often a down-played afterthought) serves to benefit women, it's okay. If anything could possibly inconvenience or harm women, tough luck men. What feminism actually is is an ideology wherein, in one audience of women on a female cha…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:26 AM
–

The joking around about it is really a coping mechanism to hide the internal trauma, not only to the rest of the world, but also to themselves. To wake up to some woman riding your dick is supposed to be the fantasy of every man, and they feel intense shame by the fact that they didn't necessarily enjoy it. It would make them feel like less of a man to admit that they didn't enjoy it. I promise you that they went through some serious rationalization in order to arrive at that conclusion.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:55 PM
3

Not just that, but people have conditioned to think that the act of sex to be penetrating another person if you want to distill it further.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:51 PM
5

I had a teacher/professor (dual credit) my senior year of high school who taught English. She had us read a bunch of contemporary short stories of men doing awful things to women. She would also constantly make a ton of sexist remarks against men and was extremely motherly towards the girls in the class. She constantly remarked in awe that the guys in the class showed no drive and determination in the course while the girls were all making As and Bs. Side-note: she insisted on being referred to …
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter