TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mendicant_jester Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by mendicant_jester on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer His name was David Reiner.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/20 11:29 PM
3

Then explain it. I’ve provided 2 links saying illegal recordings are not admissible in court. You’ve provided.... nothing. Oh, wait, what’s that? A third link? https://acitylawfirm.com/recorded-conversations/ A tricky question. Again, on fundamental principles of law the claimant should not come to court with ‘dirty hands’ and judges commonly believe a cheat should never prosper. The RIPA also prohibits the product of unlawful interceptions to be admissible in court. In fact, it goes on to direc…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 04:19 AM
2

Where in my link did it specify civil vs criminal? You’re still wrong. https://www.recordia.net/en/are-recorded-conversations-admissible-in-court-usa/
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 03:44 AM
1

No. You’re wrong. And I have the source to prove it. https://www.wescottlawnh.com/2020/01/27/audio-recordings-as-evidence-you-may-be-committing-a-legal-offense/
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 02:58 AM
4

In a 2 party consent jurisdiction, an illegal recording cannot be admitted as evidence. You’d still catch the rape charge, but now you also have the recording charge.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/20 07:37 PM
2

Unfortunately, basically all developed countries have child support reciprocity agreements, so they’ll get you wherever you go.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/20 09:22 AM
5

Make your opponent live up to their own standards.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/18 04:02 AM
10

Crying out that their own weapon got used against them maybe. NOW is responsible for title 9 being used that way in the first place.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/18 03:57 AM
2

No. The nuance is found in history. In the 1920’s, there was a legitimate debate in the US about whether or not the legal system should even bother prosecuting female murderers with male victims, because they simply couldn’t find a jury willing to convict. The murderess would just claim abuse, or that she was mislead, crime of passion, child trauma, you name it. She gets in front of the jury, turns on the waterworks, jury takes pity, an off she goes. There was actually a broadway musical about t…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 07:05 PM
4

I think you misunderstand, and the wording of the title doesn’t help. In order to be jailed for this offense, the DA must prove that the rape never happened. Must prove it conclusively. If a rape victim just happens to finger the wrong guy, or can’t prove HE raped her, he goes free and nothing happens. However, if the investigation proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that no rape occurred, only then can she be arrested. Many municipalities, however, will not press charges even if they can prove no…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/18 12:08 PM
1

Nonono. Failing to prove a rape does not prove false the event. If she got raped, then fingered the wrong guy, ain’t shit gonna happen to her. The courts have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the event itself did not happen. Claiming that the vast majority, or even a significant portion, of potential rape victims are too stupid to know that is disgusting.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/18 05:39 AM
2

Shitty is subjective. The spainish inquisition thought Protestants were shitty people. Puritans thought gays were shitty people. Nazi germany thought Jews were shitty people. Christian fundamentalists think abortion advocates are shitty people. The Catholic Church thought Galileo was a shitty person. Free speech is there to protect “shitty” people, because sometimes, they’re right.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 08:59 PM
2

Yeah your definitely just playing verbal semantics to whitewash reality. I’m just gonna copy paste my response to another, more reasonable responder and stop expending effort on you, But that is the entire core of my problem with bill c16. It is allowing the government to use linguistic controls to define reality as they please, and subsequently punishing citizens for daring to express themselves outside the framework laid down by the state. Just because the government says it’s asset forfeiture…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 08:22 PM
2

But that is the entire core of my problem with bill c16. It is allowing the government to use linguistic controls to define reality as they please, and subsequently punishing citizens for daring to express themselves outside the framework laid down by the state. Just because the government says it’s asset forfeiture and not theft doesn’t change the fact that they are seizing rightfully earned private assets without providing goods or services in return. Just because the government says there are…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 07:55 PM
2

So by your logic, an activist for better policing cannot say that an unarmed black man was murdered because by definition, the state has a monopoly on force? An anti war activist cannot say that civilians were murdered because civilian casualties are not blanket prohibited by the international laws regarding warfare? Can we say OJ Simpson murdered his wife? Or does his acquittal and double jeopardy laws suddenly render his slayings legal?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 07:21 PM
2

But you could hardly be blamed for expressing yourself by saying that the state has effected lawful kidnapping on you for the crime of burning a plant. Insistence on legal terminology is an insistence on whitewashing an unjust action for the sake of appearances.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 07:15 PM
2

No, claiming it ISN’T theft is calling a spade a shovel and insisting they are 2 different things. Is it the unwilling seizure of your assets without tendering any service or recompense? It is. Let’s go at a different angle. Canada’s 1982 constitution guarantees freedom of expression and freedom of the press. The government may legally restrict free speech with the aim of ending discrimination, ensuring social harmony, or promoting gender equality, but the definition of hate speech, which is pun…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 07:12 PM
1

But that’s exactly the point I’m arguing. Whether the punishment was imprisonment or the seizure of property, the outcome of the law is flat-out unjust. Just because there is legal mechanism mandating jail, doesn’t mean it isn’t legal kidnapping. Just because a government body rules your assets to be forfeit, doesn’t mean it’s not government sanctioned theft. Collecting taxes is more akin to seizing rightful payment for services rendered (military, schools, roads), but the seizure of assets as p…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:53 PM
6

“Existing outside the approved thought corridor is the same as violence, so the state should seize your assets for the good of the party.”
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:42 PM
4

It is the taking of another persons rightfully earned income as punitive damage for the crime of speaking ones mind. The only stupid one here is the person trying to color this as a just action by a benevolent state.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:32 PM
-6

So then theft.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 06:23 PM
23

What if he refused to pay the fine? Answer: jail.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 05:44 PM
-1

That’s just as well, because you can’t even keep from dropping the small ones.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 10:02 AM
8

Hey, Scotland Yard! U/sealedindictments raped me!
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/18 05:12 PM
2

As long as you don’t mind being the dickbag. Remember, it all started when he suggested you wait to comment until you’ve “Reddit”. Seems reasonable to me, so maybe your assessment of him as a troll is based entirely on his calling you out for commenting on something about which you know nothing.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/18 10:34 PM
2

No hombre, it’s reddiquette. The unspoken/unwritten rules of conduct. There was an r/askreddit post about it like a week ago. Basically a list of shit that, if you do this, you look like a dickbag. If you are on Reddit long enough, you learn these things by observation, and most are based on argument fallacies. The first I mentioned is a discouragement of ad hominem, the second discourages appeal to authority, but both have, through unwritten expansion, been applied to precisely the behavior you…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/18 10:16 PM
2

Yet another of the Commandments of The Snoo; Thou shalt not use thine own position to leverage for esteem, for all Redditors are equal under the Snoo. You definitely brought up his home life and his age. This is considered poor form, especially when all he did is suggest that maybe you ought to read the thing on which you are commenting, before you post a comment. Since Reddit is literally a phonetic spelling of the words “Read it”, this seems like a fair suggestion, no matter how grumpy he may …
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/18 09:56 PM
2

And yet you ended up looking like the asshole. See I wouldn’t know these things about you, because I’m not a petty dick who makes value judgments on people I don’t know in an effort to make myself feel superior, especially not in an attempt to discredit my critics. For an ER nurse, you sure show a lack of empathy. Do you make value judgements on your patients too?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/18 09:30 PM
4

Lo, for thou hath broken one of Reddit’s commandments: thou shalt not use past posting history to try to shame thy fellow redditor. You don’t know why he’s in his parents basement. For all you know, his parents are invalids and he is their primary caregiver.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/18 09:18 PM
2

It’s both. All the middle eastern letters are known as “Semitic script.” Languages like Arabic follow spelling and grammar rules of Semitic origin. Jew can be used to describe a particular racial/genetic background, much like Persian or Arab. It’s just that Jews had their own language, culture and even religion, from which the rest of the Semitic languages, races, cultures, and religions likely originated.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 06:43 AM
4

Tell that to the US court and legislative system. If someone breaks into your car or home, those are considered to be your last refuges, and you do not have to wait until the intruder attempts to harm you, nor are you required to attempt to flee. Those requirements apply only in the public space. In your home or your personal vehicle, you only need feel sufficiently threatened to respond with physical force, including deadly force. Google castle law for a full rundown.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/18 12:56 AM
7

Not according to castle law. Anyone attempting to gain unauthorized entry into ones home or vehicle may be assumed to be acting with hostile intent.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/18 12:29 AM
20

Planned parenthood does give out free condoms. Lifestyles in a paper bag.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/17 11:34 AM
1

That's why you don't tell your SO, no matter their gender, how much you want to fuck someone else, no matter how far removed. I'm far from incel, but I'm smart enough to know how much I'd hurt my gf if I went around comparing her to other women. It's akin to telling her "I'm only with you because you're the best I can do." That's telling her that there are women out there who are worth more than she is. Apply the same principle vice-versa or else you support the same double standard that this su…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 05:23 PM
7

"White knights make my ass-pussy moist"
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/17 12:09 PM
7

Ha. It's okay, I've been guilty of the same mistake. Pretty sure the two subs share a ton of users.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/17 01:39 AM
19

Omg, the bleed through is real. You thought you were on Tumblrinaction didn't you?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/17 01:32 AM
2

The first bit is the most naive thing I've read this year. If you think for one second that any cop in his right mind would judge a case of reciprocal violence based on physique, you're as daffy as they come. What you said is what is SUPPOSED to happen. That's far from what does happen. Especially when one considers the masculine physique to be inherently superior the that of the feminine (because it is.) The fella always goes to jail. In fact, I would invite you to show me ONE instance of recip…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 06:42 PM
1

Are you familiar with the Duluth model? In domestic violence cases involving reciprocal violence, the man is charged and the woman is not. This is not exaggeration, this is legal precedent. This is the policy in most states, including my own. And I suppose a clever fella might claim to know the future. An honest one wouldn't though. He would, however, be familiar with precedent and procedure of western legal systems enough to know that if one stranger breaks a second strangers car window, and th…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 01:27 PM
1

False equivalence again. The leveling of charges happens whether retaliation occurs or not. If retaliation occurs, both parties get charged. Unless of course, we are talking about domestic violence, in which case the one in possession of a penis gets charged. Meanwhile lack of consent is what qualifies rape as rape, but only if the offender has a penis, otherwise it's sexual assault. And as for your other comment, a clever fella would tell you not to waste money on a powerball ticket.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 12:13 PM
1

There never would have been an attempted murder case and you know it. She's getting charged for damage to property and throwing things at vehicles. Even if she had been male, and had not gotten punched, there would not have been an attempted murder case. Reach harder.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 11:44 AM
1

Cause we all know the legal system isn't chock FULL of pussy passes. /s She threw a figurative TON of items at his vehicle that could have, and in one case did, make his vehicle unsafe for operation. Have you ever seen a tire blow out at even 50 mph? Ever had it happen to you? Ever tried to drive with a windshield absolutely covered in cracks? The life of that dude, and the life of others around him, driver or pedestrian, were endangered by her actions. Have you ever had the tires of the car in …
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 10:50 AM
1

What on earth are you talking about? You're the only one who thinks that. Top comments are all about her getting her due, and the rest are telling you you're full of shit. Your comment is at the bottom, where it belongs. This video has been posted twice, each with 75 and 56 up votes respectively. Are you trying to say that lack of attention = lack of approval? You haven't been on this sub long have you? It's okay, you won't be here much longer anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 09:36 AM
1

I'll tell you why. If a nail punctures a tire, the loss of control could threaten a life or two. Cheating does not. False equivalence. Plus, if a lady or a man cheats, they both expect an end to the relationship, not violence. Interference with the proper operation of up to 2 tons of metal poses a significantly higher risk to not only the operator, but other vehicles nearby as well. STDs don't. Violence begets violence. Not adultery. But nice try. Really, it was cute.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 03:06 AM
1

Fact She fucking admitted to chucking the items at his vehicle. Only a dumbass would think they could pull this shit, stand there in defiant posturing, and not expect a good thump across the skull. She deserved to get faceplanted to the pavement in a citizens arrest. If a dude did all this shit, he would prepare for a fight. Australians are pussywhipped, with the exception of this brass balled gentleman. She got the lions share of charges. Conclusion: go back to 2x you Aussie ninny.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/17 04:30 AM
1

American legal system is largely descended from English common law. Ideas like right to due process and burden of proof did not originate in America, but rather are heirlooms from the European Enlightenment era, which in turn descend from the legal and philosophical traditions of European society.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/17 02:38 PM
1

It's set to private
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/17 08:27 PM
20

R/antifapassdenied R/feministpassdenied Neither are super active, both are decidedly more niche, but they travel the same vein against post-modernist ideology. If seeing assholes get their comeuppance is more your style, r/justiceserved is more active than r/justiceporn
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/17 12:15 AM
1

Except the pussy pass cannot be invoked in a verbal fight, as there is no taboo against telling a woman off. The term directly refers to a woman expecting special treatment just for possessing female genitalia. Custody battles, physical altercations, etc. It is socially fine to say whatever you want to a woman, so the only thing I can think of that might fit the bill while not being violent might be the occasional judge who throws the book at a girl despite her secondary sex characteristics, and…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 04:58 PM
2

Why don't you tell us what sort of content in which a pussy pass is invoked and subsequently denied that you would like to see? Because frankly if we didn't have the violence, we would get MAYBE a post per month of new content, and the sub would choke to death on reposts. Custody battle where father gets full custody? Because that totally happens enough to support a subreddit. /s The thing is, the kind of situations that involve the invocation of a pass based on sex with subsequent denial almost…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 03:05 PM
1

Social justice even in its original context doesn't mean civil rights. It's a leftover from communist movements that denotes equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity, which is precisely why tens of millions of soviet citizens starved to death during the Lysencoist famines. The Khmer Rouge forced children to murder their parents in the name of social justice. You can stand for whatever you want, but using the term social justice calls to mind the people's revolution in China as wel…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 01:53 AM
2

Nah, she brought backup. She had 2 girls with her, plus idk whose side the other dudes were on, plus she was loud and in his face. He had neither the space nor the time to think it through. If it's 3 on 1, you deal with threats as quickly, efficiently, and brutally as you can. You don't know who's armed or not. His takedown was all three, and this dissuaded anyone else from jumping in while he was on the ground. The sheer shock put everyone else on their heels. This is exactly what he should hav…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/17 11:00 AM
6

Tell you what, if I see a vid of some bitch punching a dude and getting punched back, and it stays up, then I'll believe it. Till then you're just another SJW admin white knight doxxer with no ethics.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 06:16 PM
34

Bullshit. Fuck you. Show discussion logs. Until then I'm just gonna assume you're the censorious admin that assisted in doxxing a mod of a sub you don't like.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 06:13 PM
79

Or they told him to hand it over or it would be banned.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 06:09 PM
2

Nah hombre, see, the US civil war wouldn't have affected the rulership of any other nation. The British one would. Big difference. And simply proclaiming lack of substance does not make it so, especially knowing that England is just as much an umbrella term as Britain is. You know, even if we use your definition by where it took place, some of the Contested territories were in wales, but we dont call it Welsh do we? No, we don't. Plus, if either side won, that side assumed rulership of Britain, …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 05:58 PM
2

There is no British kingdom. They are still separate govts, just with the same king. So your first point is blatantly incorrect, especially when you take into account that there were, in fact, 3 English civil wars. It is British because the wars would affect the political landscape for the entire British landmass. And Wikipedia is not a credible source. Oh, and perhaps avoid calling someone a pedant when you are guilty of pedantry of a higher order. Because splitting hairs doesn't make you look …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 05:31 PM
2

The difference is spelling. That's it. Especially when you understand that the British isles were all ruled by English kings, so an English war was a British war, civil or not. And you are the one who started the name calling, so the opposing poster is justified in meeting ad hominem with ad hominem. Yes, Britain is the name of the landmass and England is the name of the kingdom, but that's like saying Australia the govt and Australia the landmass are two different things. Scottish and Irish tro…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 04:40 PM
1

Damn skippy. If I attack you, you don't stop until you are 100% certain the threat is over. There are plenty of cowards that will say uncle to stop the beating just so they can reposition to better continue their assault. If I attack you, what happens to me is MY fault, not yours.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 03:41 PM
5

Not in Texas. If someone breaks in, gets repelled, and as they are leaving, they do me the courtesy of letting me know they will be back with friends to finish what they started, I am legally entitled to pursue in order to neutralize the threat.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 03:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter