TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mensrightactivist Archive

View 25 posts and 134 comments by mensrightactivist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
195

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:00 PM
34

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:43 AM
29

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights22/11/11 01:37 AM
16

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:05 PM
15

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:04 PM
13

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights29/09/11 08:58 PM
13

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:22 AM
10

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights11/10/11 07:20 PM
10

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:57 PM
9

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:36 AM
8

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights29/06/11 07:07 PM
5

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:02 PM
5

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:59 PM
5

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights26/05/11 12:36 AM
5

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:48 PM
5

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:50 PM
5

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:10 PM
4

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights25/05/11 07:52 PM
4

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:41 AM
2

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:40 AM
1

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:33 PM
0

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:26 PM
0

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights29/06/11 01:31 PM
0

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:52 PM
0

mensrightactivist/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Everybody says there is a race problem, everybody says this race problem will be solved when people learn the only way to win the race is not to race at all.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 01:47 AM
2

The language is gender-neutral. It creates a standardization so that male victims of rape can get a fair investigation, too.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:30 PM
1

Depends on the jurisdiction. They have electrocution in Florida, but that usually requires a trial.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:23 PM
1

Your sarcasm detector. It is broken. Might want to check your humor sensor, too.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:20 PM
1

If there was, the chair would be a woman, going by EU logic.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:04 PM
1

So are you telling us not to put hot sauce in used condoms?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:51 PM
1

Well that's not right. Have you asked the moderators to ban these impersonators?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:45 PM
3

You have a big problem. /r/reddit.com no longer exists. Also, why don't you ask /r/RadicalFeminism, since that is more like the opposite of this reddit? 1) Rape Culture is a woman's dogwhistle phrase. It is used to take the responsibility away from rapists and place it upon all men. That way, they can create False Rape charges against any man. It also reinforces the idea of the ephebophile and pedophile men, when women are just as likely to diddle children. It takes all responsibility away from …
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:15 AM
1

That myth about submissive Chinese women is stupid. This dumbass never heard of the dragon lady? The two myths pretty much cancel each other out. The lesson is clear: forget about racial stereotypes, since all women are potential rapists divorcees.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:03 AM
6

We know that you don't represent all women, but you still manage to make women look bad, David.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:31 AM
-2

Seriously? Every response here is regurgitating what I just said: no one should be assigned any gender at birth some want to be viewed as a particular gender
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:37 PM
-4

At the same time, some want to be viewed as a particular gender, getting insulted if you don't call them a woman. I want to be called by my gender when my gender becomes known. Also, there are plenty of trans people who would get offended if you called them a woman, notably female-to-male trans people. You realize you said the same thing as me?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:35 PM
-1

there seems to be an identity toggle in the brain You can cite Eliot and I can cite Fine. Science hasn't answered the question to that degree of certainty yet. What I have posited before are the various positions I have heard from trans people and feminists and taken them to their logical conclusion. So you posit that the question is a false dichotomy. Okay, let's go this route. So here is what trans people and feminists seem to disagree on: what exactly is the difference between being "male" an…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:33 PM
-1

Logic may not mean what you think it means. Yet no one can answer the question. Is gender a social construct? If so, then why identify as one? If not, then why identify with one, unless you're a gender essentialist? So? Bigot much? Seriously? I haven't said anything about what I personally believe in with regards to calling trans people anything. These are observations I've made and I am relating them to the people in this community. If you want to bring your brigade in, you're not really helpin…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:55 AM
-4

If we're talking about privilege as feminists and trans people put it, then having privilege doesn't mean it's all roses for you. It doesn't mean bad things can't happen to you. I'm trying to explain this concept and all you want to do is make us enemies by nitpicking things I didn't even say. For every trans person that says gender isn't a social construction, there's another that says it is (like the person that this post is directly linked to). So is there an actual consensus among trans peop…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:42 AM
18

So... girls in high school slut shame if they're jealous, and men in adulthood slut shame if they lack confidence. Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 09:02 PM
2

They aren't even really feminists, or anything, for that matter, other than anarchist. None of the feminist/equality reddits link to them. They're also conspicuously absent from the r/racism sidebar. It is their strategy for obtaining a "mass consciousness" by "allying" with groups that may have an anti-capitalist element. Which makes this really interesting. It was easy for them to remove r/feminisms from their sidebar, considering r/feminisms wasn't reciprocating anyway. The question is, what …
/r/MensRights29/09/11 08:35 PM
2

Thanks for using standard terms. TBH I can't stand the portmanteau "guyliner". "Eyeliner" is already gender-neutral on its face, but the existence of the term shows that socially it's reserved for women. Oh wait, we're discussing makeup tips, not men's right to wear makeup.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:44 PM
4

That's actually the trans position from what I understand: gender is a social construct, and you can't change what genders you are attracted to. The difference is that what you call "gender expressions" isn't viewed as a linear dichotomy between man/women but a fluid, multi-dimensional... container of genders. Feminists are all over the place when it comes to this. Trans people seem to have a problem with feminists that think there's a difference between women born as women and transwomen. The b…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:03 PM
-23

It seems most of the trans community agrees that people are assigned gender at birth, if they're using terms like "male-assigned at birth". Trans people seem to view assignment as wrong. Like no one should be assigned any gender at birth. At the same time, some want to be viewed as a particular gender, getting insulted if you don't call them a woman. I can at least understand the ones that say they have a "null" gender - at least they're logically consistent. Anyway, it wouldn't be female privil…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:54 PM
7

Alleged victim. Unless it's been proven in court, we don't know anything for sure.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:42 PM
2

Okay, thanks!
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:54 PM
3

Okay, thanks.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:53 PM
1

I don't understand what the CSI effect is or how it applies here, can you explain?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:32 PM
7

Victory! Nothing can stop us now!
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:30 PM
2

The current ban policy doesn't have a rule for outside behavior, though. If that is a reason for non-reversal then it needs to be written in so everyone has a clear understanding. It also needs to be written in so it can apply to the latest bans which include people that never participated here. They're making fun of us because of that.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:28 PM
0

The first step is saying someone is a date rape apologist, then they tell you you're a part of rape culture. There is no rape culture.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:08 PM
1

I saw some of that incident but wasn't sure what happened so I really appreciate hearing your side of it. To be honest, I'd be really bothered by having a woman lead an MRM reddit, or someone forcing a "no misogyny" rule on to /r/mensrights. But good on you for holding another mod accountable... we need a lot more of that, not just in the gender reddits but on the whole site. Too bad it didn't work out but it sounds like you'd be an awesome mod. Totally friending you! Would you say that /r/femin…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:04 PM
3

Thanks. Can we get this in writing? That behavior outside of this reddit results in a ban?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:50 PM
2

That's the point. Any behavior is suspect, especially explanations without evidence. Saying you have video isn't being persuasive or rational, it's having actual physical evidence.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:48 PM
-5

Sure, but this is about an investigation procedure, not a court of law.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:43 PM
-5

We're talking about investigation procedure, which by default, should doubt individual accounts. This has no bearing on the court of public judgement.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:41 PM
2

expects certain behaviors – like that I secretly loathe my lover and just want him to buy me things. Even within the gay community, men are seen as money trees.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:51 PM
4

Wouldn't the analog to masculinity be femininity? Or did you really mean masculinity is what is attractive to women?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:39 PM
2

Thanks for replying! It's very refreshing to hear such a balanced outlook on gender activism. Have you considered starting your own feminist reddit?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:35 PM
3

I'll ask kloo, thanks.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:26 PM
1

Mainstream feminism is white... it's a common criticism from other feminists.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:23 PM
-13

Well, to be fair, someone wrongfully accused would first react with indignation. If you immediately jump to rationalizing the situation, that can look suspicious.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:16 PM
1

Just curious, what rule did she break if she claims she never commented here? Perhaps kloo would know?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:06 PM
1

date rape apologist. That sounds mighty feministy.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:54 PM
1

banning was a suitable move by the mods who make the decisions This is the problem. Mods are making up rules out of thin air and making a unilateral decision against the users' input. If this is the way this reddit wants to be, it should say so. Do you think this is unreasonable?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:50 PM
2

I've seen yellowmix mention she was banned from here without ever making a comment. Is that true?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:40 PM
1

There's no reason to be surprised because you don't understand the core issues here: 1 - free speech is being limited (and it's speech that isn't even in this reddit), 2 - if there are limits on free speech they are not clearly defined (you haven't shown this), 3 - this ban includes people who never even posted here, 4 - the ban is arbitrary which is what we criticize feminists for. your getting awfully close to white knighting this whole situation I really do not appreciate personal attacks lik…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:34 PM
2

Right. We're going by the op's logic here, so a company that hired only women would be getting deficient/less work at a lower wage, which equalizes the situation. The company would get what it's paying for. What I'm saying is that black people do not put in deficient/less work, yet get paid less. The op wants a company to save money, therefore, it would make more sense in op's scenario to hire black people to get the same quality of work as men, but at a lower wage.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:21 PM
1

That's awesome. Do you think feminists have any value?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:18 PM
-1

Even when you hold for those factors, there is still a gap: http://www.jbhe.com/news_views/47_four-year_collegedegrees.html Based on op's logic and our explanations for the male-female wage gap (maternity leave, etc.), blacks would be the first choice ahead of women.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:45 PM
1

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0882775.html Black white wage gap is 30% on average, which is worse than the man-woman wage gap. http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2008/05/01/immigrantearnings.html In Canada, highly educated immigrants earn 48 cents to the dollar for native-educated immigrants.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:34 PM
1

They have their own reddits but they're very active here. Just a little while ago: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/iusjp/prejection_is_what_happens_when_youre_rejected/ And yeah, I think we've all been preemptively banned by these extremist MRAs.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:31 PM
1

There has to be limits on behaviour , they had lots of rope and over and over strung themselves up by it , we get a lot of feminist MRA loons on here who come, argue , get argued with and leave , these ones are poison and i commend kloo feminist mods because i dont know in his their position if i could have waited as long , it shows he is they are a better man person than me , this lot enjoyed the privelage of being able to be abusive for a long, long time , its been dealt with , do you really f…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:27 PM
1

It's just a list of statistics. What you're saying is what the feminists say when we post links to them. We say it's just a link. There's nothing wrong with browser add-ons. There are Greasemonkey scripts and Reddit Enhancement Suite, which can be used to ignore users. If we're going to ban these types of things then we need to have them clearly stated in the rules, otherwise the mods can ban for any reason, which is what this basically is.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:03 PM
6

Semantically the same, once you're free of feminism.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:51 PM
1

We're not talking about their behavior, we're talking about our banning policies. There is nothing in the rules that says this stuff is not allowed.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:50 PM
1

Hit list? That's pretty dramatic. It doesn't help us when we look like a bunch of hypocritical whiners. Banning people is like permanently deleting comments... this is no better than what feminists do when they say we are targeting their reddits. If we ban these users, then we can't criticize them for banning either. Do you see the problem?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:43 PM
2

That's what the feminists says when they censor us...
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:32 PM
0

Censorship is okay to keep things calm? And what steps were taken before this "last resort"?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:19 PM
3

Why give them the attention? Were they even posting in here? This censorship is hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:15 PM
17

Are you an MRA now? We love ex-feminists.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:07 PM
0

The author of the article is a woman: Kristi Stone Hamrick. You can send feedback to Fox. We can get this tripe out of the media!
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:06 PM
1

If your argument is based on the wage gap, then every company would be staffed completely by black people.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:00 PM
5

I didn't post the picture. And we do have some white nationalist members.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:40 PM
5

Yes, the law did not consider black men "men" in the sense of a U.S. citizen with full rights (Jim Crow, etc.). We have some members here that would disagree (as the downvotes show), but men's rights is about ALL men and this shows that we are against racism by upvoting pictures of black men fighting for their rights in the street in the 1960s.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:29 PM
1

It's just sad that this post that helps male sexual violence survivors got 11 upvotes, while a post about some other reddit gets over 260 upvotes.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 05:55 PM
5

He needs to cut his losses before it's too late. Save a brotha, dumpaho!
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:20 AM
1

Why are people downvoting this?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:03 AM
1

If cuckolding happens when a woman cheats on a man, what do you call it when a man cheats on a woman?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:03 AM
1

I'm tired of this shit. It was a non-issue to begin with. Stop giving her attention.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:01 AM
2

So we can set an example. If there is a rape allegation, we don't post any stories or comment on any story about it until after the trial.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:00 AM
5

Do we have to be so confrontational? Some of us only want to pummel on feminism until we achieve equality What? Make up your mind.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:59 AM
4

So... uhh... fight for equality? "Oppose" sounds so negative.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:56 AM
1

"fate of our genetic material"... that is gold. He actually reads like one of us, if you translate that to cuckolding. We should try to bring him home where he belongs.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:48 AM
7

Yes, because Men's Rights defines itself in relation to feminism.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 11:50 PM
4

The guy wanted the money and by reporting the wrong location, would make it more likely the real owner would not claim it. Also, the police had video evidence. Proving a false rape is a whole different scenario. Stuff like this doesn't help.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 07:37 PM
5

"The accused has joined the investigation. It is also stated that the custodial interrogation of the accused is not required now. The people who had supplied the fake marksheets have already been arrested," her counsel Vijay Aggarwal said. She turned informant. Why the hell are we upvoting this?
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:54 PM
11

Probably the method they use. Going by news reports of women pedos, they seem to target teen boys they personally know, like students. Do women pedos really go on the internet to look for teen boys, and do they feel safe travelling TO the teen? The whole setup depends on this. What they need to do is dress Chris Hansen up as a teenage boy. Maybe a t-shirt and baseball cap would do it. Then send him to school and wait for a teacher to hit on him. We can petition NBC. Maybe they'll do it for sweep…
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:52 PM
3

What? These are two completely different situations.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:41 PM
3

Does your dad eat your mom out if your mom sucks your dad's dick? You're gonna have to tell us about all the work your parents do because we can't tell if it's not equal.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:49 AM
3

My girlfriend does laundry while I cook. By the time the laundry's done, dinner's ready. Then we both chill out and drink. She washes the dishes and I dry them and put them away. Leaves us enough energy before bedtime.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:48 AM
1

This is terrible. It is sad when men dominate other men by virtue of money. Men's rights needs to address issues of class like this. There are a couple proactive steps we can take here. One would be to strengthen Federal regulation so devious corporations can't keep separate accounting like this. Two would be to support unions so they can report these safety issues without repercussions. Three would be to strengthen whistleblower protection.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 07:43 PM
2

Makes you wonder where monogamy came from. :)
/r/MensRights29/06/11 07:19 PM
12

Who the fuck is Stormy?
/r/MensRights29/06/11 01:03 PM
1

Headlines need to be short. Isn't it implied, unless it's a post-conviction headline? The article text usually elaborates anyway.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 12:59 PM
2

This helps men report rape too.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 12:54 PM
7

Robert L. Moore's five key books would create an awesome foundation for insights into masculinity with regards to the human psyche. Start with King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine. Christina Hoff Sommers describes herself as a feminist but she's really on our side. Highly recommend her books. Very well-researched. Steven Pinker does a lot of work in evo-psych that explains a lot about gender differences in the brain. Aside from his bibliography, yo…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 12:50 PM
-2

Yes. See how simple that was? Edit: If you are asking me to comment so you can downvote me, then you are not interested in an honest discussion. Have a good day, madame.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:21 PM
1

WTF is up with your username?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:06 PM
1

We had equality before feminism swung the pendulum too far. And please, research that impacts humans starts with less complex lifeforms. Mice have always been used for brain research so we can use less invasive (and less deadly) observation techniques on humans. We can crack the skull open and hook electrodes into a mouse's brain but we'll use MRI on humans. We test stem cells on mice so we don't have to experiment on people. We have no way of testing BPA on people in a controlled manner, so thi…
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:53 PM
-2

If you cannot answer a simple question then you are not interested in an honest discussion. Good day, madame.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:45 PM
0

I'm just not seeing a battle that needs to be fought, I'm afraid. The Men's Rights Movement would not be necessary if it weren't for feminism. You're doing a fine job of derailing this entire post.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:35 PM
2

Nice. Upvote for you, fine sir!
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:26 PM
-1

Compare "misandrist" with "stupid beasts". This is a bad analogy. Misandrists can change. Stupid subhumans can't. And as for me, no, I have never hated a man simply for being a man. I hope you're not implying that I have, but from your sarcastic tone it seems that way. You didn't the answer the question. Are you incapable of misandry?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:24 PM
1

Acts are speech, according to the law. In this case, if the feminist is convicted, then the school can have a rule against hiring convicts. Choosing specific acts is too open to interpretation, and given how hostile society is to men, is only going to backfire.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:09 PM
1

First off, I am not doing what you say I am. Secondly, you are taking a general statement too personally. I take it you are completely incapable of misandry?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:07 PM
1

Being hysterical Hahahaha. "Hysterical", that's a nice touch, troll.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:03 PM
2

Not arguing that private employers can fire their employees for any reason. That is the law. The problem is how what a non-convicted act can result in. Should teachers get fired for being a feminist activist? Being a men's right activist? You do realize you're advocating for a chilling effect on free speech?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 05:37 PM
1

This isn't about personality though. For the record, I don't think personality has a basis in biology but aptitude for things like navigation and the resulting mating strategy certainly do.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 05:29 PM
3

That's why it's important for us to talk about it, because the feminist media will twist it to support the agenda. I'd like to hear how you think this article can be used in that way, so we can prepare counter-arguments. To me, it seems the article counters many feminist claims but underestimating their ability to explain it away would be a mistake.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 05:25 PM
4

Science is a real issue and forms the basis for many men's rights arguments. For example, Steven Pinker talks about how biology like this results in a lot of things that feminists deny or blame on men.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:51 PM
1

Frankly, I think the majority of women are just awesome, definitely my wife and my mother. You know, feminists have a phrase for this: "Not my Nigel!" A majority (if not all) of women are misandrist, and that's wonderful that you're vouching for your wife and your mother, but you can't give them a pass for us. I AM AN MRA AND I ALSO FUCKING LOVE AND RESPECT WOMEN. Strawman much? Every man here respects women. You're also excluding gay men who don't necessarily love women. This is one of the most…
/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:26 PM
2

She obviously has the support of the liberal media and it's distracting us from doing anything positive if we're just reacting to her latest shrill hysteria. Stop giving her exposure and she will spiral away into irrelevance just like liberals have done with Malkin and Coulter.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:15 PM
3

What does someone's job have to do with what they do in their own time? Stop policing people's private lives!
/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:07 PM
3

Females do not have to search to find mates and thus their navigational abilities have not been enhanced by evolution. Obvious driving joke aside, another scientific proof of the passivity of females in the mating process.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 03:48 PM
0

Of course. I don't think that needs to be said. Men's rights would only want to roll back things that affect men. I don't agree that older actions are always sex-neutral. Don't be confused by what you think is the "status quo" because that is exactly what feminists want you to think is "normal". Imagine a child today, about 8 years old, who thinks everything today is the "normal" way. They grow up to be 21, and they think all the funding going to Planned Parenthood is normal, that child custody …
/r/MensRights23/06/11 01:53 AM
1

r/antiracism is already taken by mayonesa. It would be a perfect fit for us since he posts and comments here already. We should ask him to link to r/mensrights if the other one won't.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 01:46 AM
0

Stop giving them attention, because they're not giving us any.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 04:09 AM
1

Wut?
/r/MensRights22/06/11 04:05 AM
1

It's on purpose. They make it look like they're fighting each other to move their single agenda together. How else did feminism get its way? Collusion. Think about it. The Patriot act was passed by both parties. The civil rights acts, both parties. The Nineteenth Amendment, both parties in a special vote. The only reason women can vote is because we gave them the right. We kept giving them rights until there were no more rights to give and now we're stuck with them having too many rights! We dun…
/r/MensRights22/06/11 04:05 AM
1

It's not in Firefox either. We need to protest them.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 03:55 AM
2

We love black people!
/r/MensRights22/06/11 03:53 AM
0

Do I have to oppose feminism to support men's rights? Of course not! But you will, in time. Everyone does. Think of it as levelling up with knowledge. Gareth explains it really well. why exactly do you use feminism to define MR's. Isn't enough to say men are discriminated against in certain ways & we seek to bring change and attention? That's one way of looking at it, and it may make your arguments sound more acceptable. The truth is, nearly everything men face is a result of feminism. Once femi…
/r/MensRights22/06/11 03:45 AM
0

Just examples, whatever is really important, did you tell both parents or just one? Do you feel closer to either parent? Distant from both? Thanks for relating your experience, by the way.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 01:00 AM
5

Does there need to be a reason besides justice? I started as a humanist then realized that they are just pawns. They spread feminist ideas without being labelled as such.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:58 AM
0

Were you older than the newborn in this situation? They're talking about a brand new baby, which means the first words and first steps won't necessarily happen in front of both parents. Birthdays, school plays, etc., sure, these are scheduled. It's the spontaneous stuff though, like a first kiss, coming home with a black eye, first period, first boner, sex, etc. and which parent you talk to regarding situations like that can make a difference.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:52 AM
2

The court's four conservatives, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented. Conservative, in the United States, generally means fiscal and social conservatism, with traditional views of family and church. Roberts and Alito were nominated by G.W. Bush, Scalia by Reagan, and Thomas by Bush the First. All of those Presidents were Republican. All other judges are considered liberal, nominated by a Democrat. Kennedy was nominated by Reagan and …
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:47 AM
0

Parental cohabitation should be the default. Adults can get over the issues that made their romantic relationship fail but can still share a household in order to better share the child. The system generally encourages parents to live apart because it perpetuates ideas of fault, in the form of domestic violence, cheating, and so on. Cohabitation would eliminate the need for alimony. 50/50 is a pipe dream. Legal joint custody is certainly possible but I assume you are talking about physical custo…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:34 AM
1

One thing we are really concerned about is circumcision. Girls aren't circumcised in the United States, and boys are. If there is a boy who is not circumcised, does he have female privilege? Let's get away from gender now. James Meredith was the first black student at the University of Mississippi. Did he have white privilege?
/r/MensRights20/06/11 11:23 PM
2

On that basis, can men have female privilege?
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:38 PM
2

It was a privilege for males to go to a university, while women were discriminated against (not allowed to go) because they were women. But there were women who did go to college during that time. Did they have male privilege?
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:28 PM
5

Every single subculture or subgroup, just as every main culture or group, comes with its own set of privileges and lack thereof. No. Just because some groups are discriminated doesn't mean the opposite group has privilege. There's no reason to apply feminist theory to this situation. It doesn't even solve the situation when the discrimination comes from the same group! Does a woman discriminating against a woman have male privilege? Do hipsters have hipster privilege?
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:04 PM
2

I'd like to hear it too, maybe with practical examples.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:00 PM
0

I don't view myself as feminist because I don't buy into most of their ideologies. I'm not even going to address the privilege thing Privilege is the basis of feminist ideology, so it's really odd to see a non-feminist bring it up. We're already quite familiar with it, and no amount of reading feminist theory is going to make us believe it. And by "us" I meant females who do not have their heads so far up feminism's ass that they can actually see reason, and will support the MRM if you guys can …
/r/MensRights20/06/11 07:54 PM
1

I absolutely do not consider myself a feminist. Ah, of course, and you are concerned about us. Your zero-sum populist phrasing doesn't fool me: "Women do bad things, but men do the same. Women are victims, and men can be too." This type of concern trolling is a great way to get your feminist ideas in here. Since it's getting upvoted, let's address some points that on the surface, no one can argue against. A raped woman is a victim, a survivor. A raped man is invisible. Depends on how you define …
/r/MensRights20/06/11 07:33 PM
8

She needs to name the bar. Shaming them is the only way that works. :(
/r/MensRights11/06/11 01:04 PM
2

The doctor is a foreigner...
/r/MensRights11/06/11 12:56 PM
1

Donated! Thanks!
/r/MensRights11/06/11 12:54 PM
1

Then go to OneY or MRR if you think this is circlejerking. There can never be enough posts about the most important topics in men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 12:48 PM
5

Wow. Who are you to decide what is a "real" Mens Rights cause? Circumcision is right up there with destroying feminism and false rape. Priorities, man, get with it!
/r/MensRights08/06/11 09:02 PM
-2

You must be a woman feminist.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 09:00 PM
2

Destroy them... by ignoring them! What is this madness you speak of?
/r/MensRights08/06/11 08:58 PM
3

Manslaughter is (loosely speaking) unintentionally but directly causing death. How would a man unintentionally stick their penis in a vag or a woman land on a guy's penis? It's either you consent or you don't. There is no half consent.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 05:44 PM
6

No, a five-year old isn't capable of saying no because the law says no one can say yes until they are 18. Retards can't say no because they're too retarded to say yes or no. These were 18 year old men and they aren't retarded. Why are you trying to take their agency away?
/r/MensRights26/05/11 05:40 PM
4

but that would depend on the details of each case So how do you know this case is rape? You're stretching the definition of the word to cover things it was never meant to. If they are capable of saying no, but didn't, then there was consent.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 05:29 PM
1

Send a letter to the U.S. Sentencing Commission about drug convicts!
/r/MensRights26/05/11 12:44 AM
1

Women don't want trans people in their bathrooms. This is unacceptable. Men would be more than happy to let trans men use our bathrooms.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 12:39 AM
1

They passed a law fixing the old law saying it was fundamentally flawed. Everyone is being sentenced under the new law. People sentenced under the old law are stuck in jail under the old (flawed) sentence. It's not like you can't undo a mistake. If you find out something was wrong in the trial (like new rape DNA evidence), you release the person from jail.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 12:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter