TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

menstruatrix Archive

View 0 posts and 493 comments by menstruatrix on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Note: merely posting here may get you banned and/or shadowbanned from a variety of other subs due to bigoted powermods and their bots.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:54 AM
2

What's important to you vis-a-vis gender issues? There's a fair bit of focus on protecting children and their interests (e.g., 'intactivism', reformation of the child support racket, ensuring a child's relationship with both parents is maintained, etc.) that's beneficial to men's rights as a knock-on effect. That segues into addressing various problems with current approaches to domestic and sexual abuse (e.g., women will routinely be denied help they need to stop abusing their partners and/or c…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:29 AM
1

British Academy of Film and Television Arts.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:45 PM
5

we should reduce the number of men by 10% Not by 10%, to 10%. I'm gonna assume she used the line cos she thought it sounded good. It's implausible that no one involved in the campaign bothered to vet the slogan, but, sure, let's pretend they were caught off guard when a handful of articles quietly explained what she was (unwittingly) advocating. In her first major public appearance after snatching defeat from the jaws of victory and giving us President Trump, the MAKERS Conference on 07Feb2017, …
/r/MensRights04/01/20 08:47 AM
1

It's appears to be true in much the same sense as the claim that the USWNT is better at soccer than the USMNT.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:11 AM
7

When a partner openly tells you they are abusive, exploitative, and untrustworthy... believe them.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 12:23 AM
2

penises Masculine vaginas, you mean?
/r/MensRights03/01/20 08:54 AM
1

Quick question: Which 2016 presidential candidate advocated for the genocide of 45% of humanity?
/r/MensRights03/01/20 05:03 AM
1

I'd be more interested to watch T2S YT videos about how The Galactic Federation of Light can help you raise your "vibrational frequency".
/r/MensRights03/01/20 01:15 AM
4

Why is this stickied?
/r/MensRights03/01/20 12:55 AM
1

Bruv. Using a synonym of feminist technoscience that might briefly confuse some people into thinking something important happened is dishonest. Yes, she "revolutionized" a dark-age-academy-style feminist circlejerk.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 12:38 AM
1

Being "well regarded" in the "feminist technoscience" community is not revolutionizing science. It mostly sounds like she built the walls of the feminist thought-ghetto little higher to keep women from making real contributions to knowledge or progress.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 12:14 AM
1

Feminist scholar karen barad used feminism and quantum physics to revolutionize scientific studies and how to do research, read empirical data and understand the intra-actions of the world (for more look into agental realism). [X] Doubt. Reading up on this reminds me of the text-to-speech YouTube channels that try to make their snake oil sound scientistic by mixing in astronomy and physics terms.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 03:41 AM
1

They want me to accept that women have it harder because decades ago they couldn’t vote or be politicians. Neither could men, generally speaking. There was a relatively small fraction of society that met the various wickets for ownership of land, etc. that qualified them to vote or hold public office, and these were mostly men, but there were women who could vote (mainly widows who had inherited and retained the necessary status/conditions from their now-deceased husbands). That the tiny fractio…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 06:50 AM
1

Reminder: "The Future is Female" refers to a Genocidal Feminist utopia where men are reduced to and maintained at ~10% of the population.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 03:10 AM
1

In 1982, Sally Miller Gearhart had an essay published in Reweaving the Web of Life, an anthology of apocalyptic feminist writing. The easay, titled "The future- if there is one- is female." (sound familiar?) sketches out a plan for a future feminist utopia... that incidentally involves reducing and maintaining men at ~10% of the population. Sally Miller Gearhart would then go on to be one of the founders of the field of Gender Studies, where you still find these plans. The intent of feminism, to…
/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:35 PM
1

Insults and "you just want male attention" are the regular response to any statement that's not sjw feminist propaganda. Kind of ironic considering how much "sjw feminist prooaganda" has been written by sexually frustrated 'political lesbians' tryna get laid.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 04:11 PM
1

To clarify: you want humanity to engage in a global re-education program because of women's rape fantasy?
/r/MensRights28/12/19 05:28 AM
1

90% of single mothers are in poverty Child support is not necessarily counted as income for the recipient, so a "single mother living in poverty" (based on the household income she earns) may in reality have an available household budget that exceeds median household income.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 02:16 AM
1

What is the significance of the no. You will be denied access to government services that require draft registration as a condition of eligible. why aren't females required to give one? Girls are not required to have the responsibilities of a citizen as a condition to exercising the rights and privileges of citizenship.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 04:47 PM
1

Penalty of fatherhood: Higher rates of fatal occupational injuries. Higher rates of fatal occupational injuries. Higher rates of fatal occupational injuries. No benefits. Higher rates of fatal occupational injuries. Higher rates of fatal occupational injuries. Early death.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 03:36 PM
1

Half the things on that list apply to the luxurious idleness of upper-class women and have little resemblance to the experience of working-class women since "Beginning" "of time". Imagine the entitlement mindset rewuured to take having someone else support you so you can putter about the house (they pay for), cooking food (they pay for) for kids (you chose to have) and thinking "woe is me" because your lifetime of lower stress and easier work means you'll have more years between retirement and d…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 03:26 PM
1

StatsCan for official Canadian government statistics on a variety of things. US Bureau of Labor Statistics for (you'll never guess) labor statistics. FBI UCR collects various crime statistics which may be relevant.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:48 PM
1

About the author... Professor, College of Law Nancy Snowden Research Scholar, College of Law Associate Dean for Graduate and International Programs, College of Law Professor, Unit for Criticism and Interpretive Theory I'm sure it's a fascinating journey into academic mental illness.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:54 PM
1

If you read the regularly posted /AskReddit threads about male victims, "Have sex with me or I'll tell people you raped me." is a pretty common MO for rapists to coerce compliance during the rape itself and/or silence afterwards.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:32 PM
1

History lesson: the "rape is about power" woozle comes from a 1970s project involving male prisoners and refers to the dynamics applying to male victims. Extending this motivation for male prisoners raping other male prisoners to men raping women is specious.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:27 PM
1

Use a better title.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 04:12 PM
1

You can read this article and come away with the impression that finally someone found a quasi-celebrity spokesperson who wants to teach boys and young men to recognize when they're being abused and put a stop to it. More likely, what she means by teach boys about domestic violence is to gaslight them that if a girl hits them, they probably deserve it. It's similar to when they talk about teaching inner city black and latin youth about combating racism. If your an inner city mother in the audien…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 04:09 PM
1

You're asking me why wouldn't a female Democrat in a party notorious for having people single out men as to why she doesn't support an equal parenting bill? Yes. Children aren't men. Even if Democrat gender bigotry extends to children, not all children are boys.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 01:40 AM
1

Don't forget that the States get their cut, too. And Federal incentive payments regardless (though these payments are larger if they have more child support on their books). "Best interests of the State." seems to be the real principle.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 09:27 PM
1

Why doesn't she want what's best for children?
/r/MensRights23/12/19 09:22 PM
1

Not like he's responsible for her choices and actions.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 09:04 PM
1

Lotta small commercial trucks and vans have been designed to be able to fit one (sometimes two) standard pallets in the cargo area. They're still annoying to load/unload with a fork, though, so people often don't do this even when knowing it's an option.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 06:11 PM
1

everyone has a choice to leave and seek help The chances of finding help varies somewhat depending on the genders of the victim and perpetrator.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 06:01 PM
1

I'll hold the door open for people, but I don't try to engage them in conversation. I greeted her, politely asked her whether she needs help,opened and hold a door for her. Yeeeah... just silently hold open the door and let 'em trudge through. Maybe you'll have a mechanical "Thanks." "You're welcome." exchange, but saying a bunch of other stuff, even if generic pleasantries, may give the impression you're trying to chat them up or something. It's also possible she'd just had a shite day travelli…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:49 PM
1

I prefer a girl I'm dating to wear less/no makeup because that shit often smells/tastes bad.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 06:10 AM
7

It's not fair that a woman has put in the effort to exploit one man individually. It's a feminist issue to make it so women can exploit all men collectively.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:53 PM
1

Needs more pixels.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:47 PM
10

Fragile hate ideologies are like that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights22/12/19 07:41 PM
2

Nah, that's just a lie people tell themselves.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 07:39 PM
24

She'll rant about how white men are pigs, then immediately look to me She doesn't cross any lines that I can go to HR about Does not compute. You can go ask HR about a coworker making a bunch of bigoted disparaging comments about people apparently on the bases of race and sex and see how they'd like it to be dealt with. I'm in Texas, if that matters TX wiretapping law is "single party consent", but your employer may have their own rules about recording devices in the workplace. I'm sure there's …
/r/MensRights22/12/19 04:11 PM
1

The rules surrounding marriage such as the taboo on premarital and extramarital sex mitigated the problem of paternity uncertainty, and maximised men's investment in their kids. "I know these are my kids, so I will work hard to feed and shelter them." This is why women slut shame and put so much effort into controlling women's sexuality. Undermining these assurances of paternity means that it will be harder to convince a man to support her and her children. And, as all the recent fashion trend o…
/r/MensRights22/12/19 05:27 AM
1

"When I found out my personal business was on the Facebook page, that caused me distress." Be nice for a judge to sit her down and explain (for well-adjusted people, anyway) you should feel bad when you've done something wrong.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 01:52 AM
4

Other that the pants-on-head DARVO gender bigotry, the observation that many people in State custody have untreated histories of traumatic physical and sexual abuse, often stretching back into childhood, is a valid point. They're just glossing over that nearly all of these people who need help are male.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 01:47 AM
5

The basic message is assume nothing, always ask. But I can recast it into a more familiar form, Affirmative Consent, that is, unless she's yelling yes enthusiastically every step of the way (do women even do that?), you are guilty if sexual harassment, sexual assault, or rape. Take home message from a gender equality perspective: (nearly) every woman is a sexual harasser, sexual assaulter, and/or rapist. Especially rape victims, since they almost certainly do nothing to ensure they have the Affi…
/r/MensRights22/12/19 01:36 AM
7

The words “rape,” and “sexual assault” do not appear in the court record, so we are not using them. This is often the underlying reason for "Romp Culture" type headlines (i.e., from the tendency for British publications to refer to women raping children as a "sex romp"). Calling a woman who rapes a child a "rapist" or referring to a woman raping a child as "rape" when the criminal code doesn't recognize a woman raping a child as rape or acknowledge that a woman who rapes children is a rapist is,…
/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:59 AM
1

A fetus isn't a person (by any definition that's not facile), so the "killing people" concern is not raised. Same reasoning applies when dealing with killing brain dead patients; the qualities that define a living thing as a person are not present.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:58 PM
1

I like steak and chicken a lot. Those are living beings that are being killed. So now that you've established that you don't care about that, do you have an actual argument?
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:38 PM
1

Those are living beings that are being killed. How long have you been a level five vegan?
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:17 PM
1

Search term: "behavioral sink"
/r/MensRights20/12/19 06:14 AM
1

What civilizations rise, endure, and are able to pass on their philosophies to future generations is ultimately a matter of evolutionary selection. A civilization that does not protect its women will not have the children to teach its ways and carry on its traditions. "Is it inspiring or exploitative?" is the wrong question. Is it adaptive? Will the philosophies of your culture allow your civilization to out-compete and/or overcome your competitors? In times of peace and prosperity, the selectiv…
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:33 AM
1

It should be a win-win for everybody. You're not thinking like a crab in a bucket. It's not enough for it to help her; if it's helping her kids and ex-husband, how is she supposed to be Top Crab? No, it has to drag down others, too. Actually, if it primarily drags down others (and her, too, just not as much), that'll make the inner crab happy.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 06:14 PM
1

I paid a prostitute and then I had sex with the prostitute I paid. Clearly no reasonable person could believe sex was what I had in mind when I gave money to the person who has sex for money.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 09:30 AM
1

Sounds like just another way to deny women's agency.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 08:01 PM
1

i wouldn't call him an asshole but he did break a kid's heart that looked up to him No. This is like telling a rape victim who can't stand to be touched that it's their fault that their kids are upset that they don't get hugs anymore.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:24 AM
7

Can you be more descriptive?
/r/MensRights15/12/19 04:22 PM
1

I'm currently reading Reweaving the Web, which I bought for the Sally Miller Gearhart essay about the genocide of 45% of humanity from which "The Future is Female" comes. Besides, it makes far more sense to monitor the results of feminism than to read some obscure authors. So focus on the almost daily calls by feminists to castrate or kill all male babies. Then tell yourself it's not a hate group. See above. Read some "obscure authors" and you know where all this shit is coming from. It's kind o…
/r/MensRights15/12/19 07:36 AM
1

Farming for content, probably
/r/MensRights15/12/19 04:14 AM
1

For attention.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 04:13 AM
1

Not to mention the fact that one of the leading causes of death (maybe THE leading cause of death, though I can’t remember the specifics) of girls age 15-19 is childbirth, meaning young girls are clearly NOT meant to have children* This claim interested me, so I looked it up and "maternal conditions" IS the 7th leading cause of death for 15-24 year old females. It's the 5th leading cause of death for 25-34 year olds. So, clearly, if you want to impregnate a woman under 35 you're a pedophile.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 04:04 AM
2

Did you fall for the The Hardest Job in the World meme?
/r/MensRights15/12/19 03:42 AM
2

Bureau of Labor Statistics (US) and StatsCan (Canada) has the numbers. The "gender work-hours gap" is roughly the same as the "gender wage gap". Anyone who brings up muh wage gap is more-or-less calling women lazy.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 03:12 AM
3

Trying to discuss it after you've made a potentially contentious edit and had it reverted is a different context than discussing it beforehand on the talk page. WP:NPOV is basically a bullshit catch-all for whatever editor is camping an article doesn't want to have present in the narrative.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 10:18 PM
1

Wafflestomp it, bruh.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 10:13 PM
1

Piss in the shower like a normal person.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 09:01 PM
1

If you're doing anything more complex to a wikipedia article besides correcting spelling/grammar, fixing dead links, or other basic maintenance, it's generally a good idea to compile all your sources, draft out the changes you want to make or information you want to add, and put it on the talk page for the article first. Making significant edits directly to the article without prior discussion will almost always be automatically reverted, regardless of how well sourced, because you did not estab…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 08:58 PM
2

There's no reason to do something like that, so definitely okay with there being some repercussions. Calling it "sexual battery" sounds a bit much (it's entirely possible he would've thwacked a male reporter in an equivalent scenario; people do dumb shit when there are video cameras around for some reason).
/r/MensRights14/12/19 08:50 PM
13

I don't think it would be wise to depend on the woman who drugged and raped you, and who now refuses to leave your home, to tell the police the truth when they show up.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 08:39 PM
9

It's often a pleasant fiction to (try to) pretend that what was done to you wasn't rape, so a rape victim may not act in a way you (think you) would react in a similar situation. If you've read the several /AskReddit threads on this topic, the threat of false accusation is also a common tactic for rapists to coerce compliance of the victims during the rape itself and/or to force the victims' cooperation and silence afterwards.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 08:35 PM
1

My bad. I thought you meant we preferred to not have men also exposed themselves to danger for a kid they don't want. That is what I meant, which is consistent with advocacy for gender equal reproductive rights (i.e., including access to abortion). You, OTOH, are arguing to more-or-less ban abortion. No, if they can't stop themselves from having sex (why would they), we need to make sure that they at least they are having protected sex. Minimize the risk. Nice strawman, though. So, you assert yo…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:13 PM
3

Nuclear weapons. Though with some spill over onto nuclear energy, since nuclear power is designed and implemented as a weapons program.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 04:59 PM
2

I don't have the raw GEI data. A secondary issue is that GEI tends not to measure or include issues where women a consistently at an advantage. There have been previous discussions about a Gender Inequality Index that uses the same biased methodology, but with the genders swapped.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 04:51 PM
1

Where are your sources? Bureau of Labor Statistics Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. Me neither, but it's happening in almost all western countries. Just playing devil's advocate, then? Because they're teaching that to kids, who are not mature enough to take precautions when having sex. They should give Sex Ed to them so they practice it safely. Abstinence is for a mature, responsible woman who wants to be 100% sure she doesn't get pregnant. So... teens and young women can get abortions? Ye…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:43 AM
5

If 40% of boys attend school, the 40% is the reference for a GEI score of 100. If 20% of girls attend school, the GEI score is 50 (20% vs 40%). If 30% of girls attend school, the GEI score is 75 (30%/40%). If 40% of girls... 100 (40/40). If 50% of girls... still 100, not 125 (50/40), because GEI is capped at 100.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 05:48 AM
1

Small enough to not matter. Not matter to who? It probably matters quite a lot to the women who'd rather not risk dying (or all the other health risks). Pregnancy is a lower fatality risk than forcing a man to use his body, to sell his life&labor, to pay 18+ years of child support, so it's logically consistent to say that if it's justifiable to force a man to support an unwanted child it's at least as justified to do the same to a woman. I'd rather we didn't do it to either. Thank you for ignori…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 05:39 AM
1

Invading "men's spaces" and making them dysfunctional is a deliberate part of the plan to Smash the Patriarchy. The destruction of STEM in particular has roots in the feminist anti-nuclear movements from the 1970s and 1980s.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 04:49 AM
1

I assumed you'd at least be able to get that by health risks, I was talking about fatal health risks. There are fatal health risks associated with pregnancy and childbirth, anyway, so doesn't really rebut the point. You are just discussing semantics. Considering the topic is that it's non-trivial to codify all this into law, "just discussing semantics" is pretty much the entire conversation. Good thing that no one is forcing them to get pregnant. Not relevant to forcing them to stay pregnant... …
/r/MensRights14/12/19 04:42 AM
4

I did talk to a doctor and he said he won't suggest anything besides to say that the choice is yours to make and no one else's. Was the doctor talking to the fetus? I mean, it's not your penis or your wife's penis that's going to have most of the nerves amputated...
/r/MensRights14/12/19 03:14 AM
1

child support became a law because of men like him saying "welp I'm done with her so I'm done with them too" like an animal Sounds like you mean because of women who have children without their partner's enthusiastic consent, like an animal.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:44 AM
31

The Gender Equality Index calculation uses the status of men in a nation (or whatever population is being measured) as the reference pivot, and the status of women's "gender equality" is expressed as a reference to that capped at 100. Example: If in South Sudan 40% of boys attend school and 60% of girls attend school, this factor contributes to the GEI score as 100, not 150, because the calculation is capped at 100. If men's life expectancy is 68 while women's is 73, again 100. If men average 3 …
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:24 AM
1

The discussion of climate change has been stripped down to the black&white of you either 100% agree that humans are able to control the global climate or you 100% think climate change is a hoax. The position that climate change is real, but it is ridiculous hubris to think we can control it, tends to confuse people who aren't familiar with the science.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:06 AM
1

Not always fatal. Nor did anything you said indicate it needed to be. And so rare it barely could be count as it. It's rare enough that many millions of women willingly accept the (low) risk of death and the other (definite) health risks. But what some people do willingly because they want a child enough to consider those risks worth the potential pay-off is not of much relevance to forcing those risks upon someone. Yes, that's why I'm telling you what should be included. Yes, and based on what …
/r/MensRights14/12/19 01:59 AM
1

Different circumstances. World isn't black or white. And it would be non-trivial to try to encompass all of the "different circumstances" under law. It's also pretty suspect that denying abortion to someone who wants one accomplishes little more than that an unwanted child is forced into existence. My stance? abortion should be illegal unless it is the case of rape, either the mom or fetus are in health risk, the fetus has visible deformities (or mental handicaps). Pregnancy per se is a health r…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 12:54 AM
1

I think it's plain insanity to have the belief that a foetus is somehow a rapist who's took up residence inside their body without their consent. It's just crazy! It's a plainly reasonable position if you entertain-for-the-sake-of-argument the insane notion that a fetus is a person at least equal to a woman.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:44 PM
1

What does billionaires trying to get rich by softening up the world population with fairy tales about being able to control the climate have to do with gender? It can come up tangentially when discussing the face of their current advertising campaign, but that's mostly a derailment.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 05:03 PM
-3

the OP said "The foetus is violating my body." And "When I consent to unprotected sex, I do not consent to a foetus to grow inside my body." Is this Pro choice gone too far? No, that's pro-choice. Somewhere along the last 40-50 years the position that there's some point during pregnancy before which the potential 'rights of a fetus' supersedes the rights of a person shifted from being "pro-life" to being considered "pro-choice". I don't believe abortion is right but I also believe that every wom…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 04:32 PM
1

No, rights for women doesnt mean less rights for you. The topic is feminism not "rights for women". The Core Values of the feminist movement do not include a call to violence or the subjugation of others in the same way that ISIS or the kkk do. The founders of Gender Studies sketched out their plan for a Genocidal Feminist utopia 40-50 years ago: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The propor…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 09:07 AM
3

Yes, dropping charges does hurt real victims, both the direct "real victims" of the perpetrators of the false accusations, and the indirect "real victims" who cannot be taken at face value.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 11:22 PM
6

Thunberg is the face of a ONE financed advertising campaign serving the interest of various billionaires, not a "child climate activist".
/r/MensRights11/12/19 11:17 PM
1

Don't fall for the billionaire's advertising g campaign.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:16 PM
1

discrimination against men doesnt exist because there are no statistics to support it Probably the same trick as with sexual assault statistics for several decades where questions relevant to victimization are asked of women and questions relevant to perpetration are asked of male respondents. Or the more recent trick where the majority of male victims and/or female perpetrators are defined out of statistical existence.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:11 PM
2

Probably it doesn't go a whole lot further than differences in gun ownership by gender and that you can attempt suicide with a gun, decide not to pull the trigger that day, then put it back down and go to work like nothing happened for months.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 02:42 PM
4

I've gotten at "automated queries" block like that before when trying to find something arcane and sending a bunch of slightly different searches in rapid succession. I don't think it's content related, but it's hard to tell when they just link you to the entire ToS as an explanation.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 11:24 PM
4

It reinforces gender malagency (e.g., male hyperagency) and thus is foundationally unchallenging to traditionalist ways of thinking.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 08:37 PM
1

Nah, that guy possibly hasn't ever noticed his big tiddied under 24 years old criteria. And if he thinks about it, there have been a lot of big tiddied girls he's turned down after a few dates because they weren't sufficiently caring and articulate, so he knows this "guys only like big tiddie grils" thing is an absolute myth.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 04:21 AM
3

Ask a guy who has only dated girls under the age of 24 with big fuckin' tits how he selects partners and he might talk about how he prefers girls who are caring and articulate, too.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 09:15 PM
2

"Clearly" in the sense that definitions were chosen that exclude the majority of rape victims, sure.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 08:27 PM
1

men being sexually assaulted is just as important, but there’s no denying is far less frequent The majority of rape victims are male.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:03 PM
1

Here's the previous iteration of this thread. The new user account for that one was /beeeejreeeegs, though, not /BrianDescartes.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:01 PM
1

Genocidal Feminism is the foundational ideology of "Gender Studies". The whole "She doesn't speak for current-day feminism!" dodge doesn't work here; she doesn't speak for feminism-- she taught it how to talk.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 05:39 PM
1

You might want to look up who hung out at Labrys and what they wrote.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 05:36 PM
1

It's happening right now. It won't be finished for "a long long time", but the plan is in motion.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:46 AM
1

Neat. How far do you let the plan for genocide go on before you say "Wait a second, maybe genocide is bad."?
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:34 AM
3

Did you even read the article about rape it literally said that 50% of was “made to penetrate” which is very similar to rape. It is not "very similar to rape". It is rape. Unless you're Mary P. Koss... in which case a rapist penetrating her vagina with the victim's penis without his consent is... "unwanted contact". Who was a consultant to the FBI/CDC and the reason why they exclude the majority of rape victims from their discussion of "Rape". And it is true people like Obama calls himself a fem…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:32 AM
1

And people like Clinton say "The Future is Female" a reference to a genocidal feminist utopia where men have been reduced to less than 10% of the human race, as outlined in an essay by Sally Miller Gearhart one of the founders of the field of Gender Studies.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:20 AM
2

The notation is fine, but "P or Q" isn't necessarily a false dichotomy. In some cases "P or Q" can be valid, by P and Q being mutually exclusive, by P and Q accurately modeling all of your choices and that you can only choose one of them, etc. An argument that fits that form could be a false dichotomy, but maybe not. And in the case of "For" and "Against", it does seem like equivocal hair splitting to try to make the case that "Not For" and "Not Against" are substantially different from "Against…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:17 AM
1

If !P = Q then there is no false dichotomy and your argument is merely equivocation. "!P != Q" (e.g. !P = !Q... not to be confused with !P --> !Q) is the basis of an assertion that it's a false dichotomy.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:57 AM
1

That is separate argument to the one criticised for potential equivocation. It stands on it's own and is Very Okay. Mixing it with the other weak, potentially equivocal, argument is the source of the criticism.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:49 AM
1

I can say from personal experience that the feminists that I know support the movement because of the culture of modern society being sexist. Anecdote, but okay. Inherently, women are going to get sexually assaulted more then men The majority of rape victims are male. women are generally going to be held to a higher standard than men [X] Doubt. (and that is the extent of it) Okay, so the women you know support feminism because they believe things that are provably incorrect. I wonder if that "sm…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:46 AM
1

Dude, we're talking about logical fallacies. Looking up the definition of the word "equivocation" in Merriam-Webster probably isn't going to lead you down the right path. false dichotomy: P = For. Q = Against. P or Q Not P Therefore, Q The assertion !P != Q is potentially equivocation, thus undermining your claim that it's a false dichotomy. It is also irrelevant, since you can "fall within the P group" for both men's rights and women's rights, be in P for one and Q for the other, be in Q for on…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:32 AM
1

I'm being very explicit when I state that their argument asserts that you are either for women's rights, or against women's rights, Which you argue is a "false dichotomy" but the assertion that it's a false dichotomy (e.g., that there are the positions "not for" and "not against" between "for" and "against") is susceptible to merely being equivocation and thus logically invalid. and that if you are for men's rights then you are automatically against [wo]men's rights. And this argument does not f…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 08:52 AM
1

My argument is that the feminist claim is a false dichotomy as they believe you are either for women's rights, or against women's rights. That argument is susceptible to be equivocation. This is why it's weak. It also bears no relevance to "either you are for men's rights, or against women's rights" being false, because you can be for/against men's and women's right independently.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 11:21 PM
1

However, it is an invalid premise as it's possible to be both for men's rights, and for women's rights. Correct. All the shit about "implies a false dichotomy" and "logically invalid" is irrelevant. But because you have it there and it is weak it weakens your entire argument.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 10:56 PM
1

That's what I implied with the false dichotomy that I posted. No, that whole section of the argument has no bearing on the base premise (if men's rights then against women's rights) being true or false. It is, additionally, poorly constructed. And since you don't need to make that part of the argument at all... don't.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 10:42 PM
1

You're trying to make an argument of logical invalidity that does not hold water. Explicitly: You can be for women's rights. You can be for not against women's rights. You can be for not for women's rights. You can be for against women's rights. Whether lumping the last three into a single category creates a false dichotomy or whether having the last three as separate positions is equivocation has no bearing whether each, any, and all of them can be combined with "support men's rights". The prem…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 10:26 PM
1

Depends whether you recognize positions between "for" and "against" (e.g., "not for", "not against", "abstain") as legitimately separate positions, or if it's just equivocation.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 06:43 PM
1

Wth is the point of this? Money. And also why are controllers bad if they're masculine? They mostly get money from men, when they want to be getting money from women, too.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 06:08 PM
3

If you have a viable path to jump start men's rights I'd like to hear it. I'm willing to change my position if needed. Maybe I'll adopt your ideas. Due to the empathy gap, women-are-wonderful effect, ingroup/outgrow biases, gender malagency, etc. it's usually more persuasive to frame gender equality advocacy in terms that do not focus on helping or protecting men. E.g., "each year, 140k US children become the newest victims of paternity fraud".
/r/MensRights01/12/19 09:38 AM
3

for a few minutes of action Absolutely coincidental paraphrase of Brock Turner's dad, promise guise! This post totally isn't here to be screenshot and/or linked elsewhere! Live faithfully by the Mike Pence rule Yep, nothing at all suspicious about the content of this post! Have you been disillusioned by a religion you formerly belonged to? Rethink your position and start going back. No? And no. Do you have good ideas that you've been ruminating on to support men's rights? Tell us. I am eager to …
/r/MensRights01/12/19 03:48 AM
28

His female therapist was shown to be completely uncaring about his mental health, just there for a paycheck. While the therapy scenes did give a strong just-going-through-the-motions vibe, I read that more as her (and him) being resigned to the fact that there was nothing else the system they were trapped in would do to help him, regardless of whether she cared or not.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 03:24 AM
2

This is a blog post, but it has a bunch of links you can chase down. The passage that put it in my search results is: Moreover, at least two studies by Western scientists have shown a negative correlation between female circumcision and HIV. The authors of one of the studies, both seasoned statisticians who expected to find the opposite relationship, described their findings as a “significant and perplexing inverse association between reported female circumcision and HIV seropositivity.” Note th…
/r/MensRights01/12/19 12:54 AM
1

"I was too drunk to remember driving." Neat.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 12:30 AM
1

"Fun" fact: if a man was robbed, assaulted, and raped "made-to-penetrated", the FBI UCR guidebook would have the report recorded only for the robbery and assault.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:38 AM
1

Address the biggest problem first... The primary risk factor for injury, severe injury, and intimate partner homicide is female perpetration of abuse. Teaching women not to abuse their partners and taking victims of women's abuse seriously so they have access resources so the cycle can be broken before it escalates to that "forest fire with oil involved" are the two most effective ways to save women's (and men's) lives.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:31 AM
5

#IfWomenWereMenForADay no one would care.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 12:26 PM
1

Are we talking about the thing where a group is problem solving and one person suggests something and it gets shot down, then someone else suggests something similar and everyone is totally into it? And the first person thinks the second person stole their idea and they should get the credit, not the person who successfully pitched the winning idea?
/r/MensRights27/11/19 10:56 PM
14

Men are unsympathetic victims. Women are sympathetic abusers. The police generally dislike domestic dispute calls because they are almost always a shit show with no clear path to a good resolution. And even if you find one, this time, there'll be another call next week. Using a one-size-fits-all type model removes the requirement to get involved, understand the problem, or use good judgement... and (see first paragraph) doesn't result in in a PR nightmare even if you are enabling abusers and/or …
/r/MensRights27/11/19 12:30 PM
6

Public scholarships are not permitted to discriminate on the bases of Protected Class characteristics, as this is a violation of equal protection law. You can apply for a "female only" scholarship without any need to pretend to be anything other than what you are. They may find some other pretext to reject your application, but they cannot discriminate on the basis of sex or other Protected Class identity.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 12:22 PM
1

For what purposes? For instance, there are a couple dozen unrelated subreddits you've just been banned from by posting here. Are you trying to avoid things like that on twitter?
/r/MensRights27/11/19 12:16 PM
7

Meh. I never liked being expected to hug random relatives as I kid, so consequently I usually ask my kids whether they want to hug anyone. Similar thing with asking if they want to share. And not as a kind of mere-formality thing, they will occasionally say "No." and know that's the end of it. Usually they're fine with hugging/sharing/etc.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 12:13 PM
1

I've never paid much attention to Lauren Southern, but I'm surprised she's was born in 1995. I would've guessed late 1980s. Anyway. You're not going to be able to get clarification about her exact views from a bunch of random strangers on the internet who know nothing about her beyond what you tell us. Either give us us specific examples of the kind of shit she says and posts, or (preferred solution) talk to her about these things.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 02:41 AM
1

The change that occurred in 2017 was that Russia started treating violence against relatives and violence against non-relatives under the same code. Prior to 2017, violence against relatives was automatically a Criminal Code violation with much harsher sentencing than if you had committed identical violence against a non-relative, which was an Administrative Code violation (assuming the violence was minor... basically, think felony vs. misdemeanor) I.e., you get in an argument with someone you k…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 01:59 AM
2

Well a man doesn't have a vagina. No need for the casual transphobia, bruh. If it's worded as a penis penetrating x/y/z there's really not that much ambiguity. The UK's "Rape" statute I linked previously is unambiguous that the perpetrator of the offense can only be someone with a penis. "a penis penetrating x/y/z" is still ambiguous about whether it only applies to the rapist's penis and the victim's x/y/z, or if it also could apply to the rapist's x/y/z and the victim's penis.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 12:54 PM
1

There are some potential issues with translation, but it seems like all they did was look up female convicts for various types of homicide and check if the victim was a boyfriend/husband/intimate-partner. If this was the case, they seem to just assume it was really a case of defending themselves from domestic violence. It's pretty much like assuming that "About 14,000 women die in Russia each year at the hands of husbands or other relatives, a 2010 UN report says." at the end and assuming each o…
/r/MensRights26/11/19 12:03 PM
1

Did he fall for the "Hardest Job in the World" meme?
/r/MensRights26/11/19 11:14 AM
1

I must say, when you give awards to such things, the value of the awards you give tend to decrease quite a lot. Reminds me of back in the military. One guy from Reactor Controls would get an award for repairing a mission critical circuit board by hand with a soldering iron and parts cannibalized from other personal electronics. Then a CS would get the exact same award because that cake he deocorated for some khakipants on his birthday was really nice.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 10:55 AM
1

The founders of Gender Studies sketched out their plan for a Genocidal Feminist utopia 40-50 years ago: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 07:39 AM
1

In granting the two-year exemption, Mr O'Connor found there were no "compelling reasons or objections" to deny the application. I haven't looked anywhere and still haven't found anything!
/r/MensRights26/11/19 06:28 AM
3

Considering she's already doing the "muh mentions"/"harassed off the internet" two-step, I opted not to provide the link. It's easy enough to find if you read the article.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 04:29 AM
2

Sounds like something to say when called-out for not practicing what you preach, so you have to come up with an excuse for your hypocrisy and point the finger at someone else.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 03:28 AM
1

Programming ? There are tons of white women in programming. The software engineer who wrote most of the custom applications where I work is a white woman. One of the main controls programmers (DCS/PLC shit) is a white woman. Coding is generally a comfy office job that doesn't involve a lot of physical exertion. You start getting into things that involve field work, installing hardware, calibrating instrumentation in situ, etc. and women become scarce.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 01:07 AM
1

She posted about it in some detail on twitter on 20Sep2018. The sample sizes are tiny and she seems to have no motivation to take this into account. For instance, in one slide she points out "40% of disabled individuals experienced assault, vs 16% of abled respondents"... That 40% appears to be two individuals. It's not entirely clear what definitions were used or how questions were phrased. Same slide as above "17% of women vs 0% of men [experienced assault]", but the exact same verbal or physi…
/r/MensRights26/11/19 12:42 AM
1

Well, does the Montana statute explicitly specify the victim's vagina/anus/mouth as the target of penetration, or could a rapist's vagina/anus/mouth being penetrated by the victim's penis or other body part satisfy the elements of the crime? There are some places that have statutes that are unambiguous about a woman raping a man not being the crime of "Rape" (e.g. the UK "Rape" statute). Most of the ambiguous statues seem to be pretty similar to the definition used by the FBI/CDC, and that one p…
/r/MensRights26/11/19 12:06 AM
2

It's right to call out someone making bigoted remarks motivated by a hate ideology. Talking about their sex life is not the way to do it, as this case abundantly proves. Compare with that Katy Gallagher/Mitch Fifield "mansplaining" exchange from 2016.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 11:50 PM
14

Would it be unlawful for the City of Baltimore and State of Maryland to continue providing $1000000+ of taxpayer dollars and government support to any organization that had announced an explicit commitment to discriminate on the basis of protected class characteristics?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:37 AM
1

Maybe your body's natural response is gettin' hype to do something, but you don't do anything, so you interpret it as "getting angry" for whatever reason. And since nobody else knows what you're feeling, you can just reinforce your interpretation, until you've conditioned yourself enough that it becomes true. And because you frame your do something response as ANGERY, the things you do are "often destructive."
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:26 AM
20

Quick rundown: There was some proposed legislation to relax import laws on TASERs and during debate it's argued in favor under the justification that women can use them to defend themselves against rapists. The suggestion that women could be empowered to be responsible for their own safety is apparently super offensive victim blaming to SH-Y and distracts from the real problem: men. Not rapists, mind you. Men. Some other politician responds to the 'all men are rapists' bit by suggesting that may…
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:10 AM
1

getting angry surely isn't more healthy than releasing it through tears "More healthy" for who and by what metric? Also, if you just sit there seething, passively being angry, well, yeah, no shit that's not going to help if you express/process emotion through physical activity. Go do something. I believe there's scientific evidence that crying literally excretes stress hormones through your tears. After a bit of googling, the only source for this claim (if not pure woozle) seems to be Frey, and …
/r/MensRights25/11/19 08:26 AM
2

So, basically, any incident of domestic dispute is recorded as "domestic violence against women" regardless of who was the perpetrator or victim?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 05:33 AM
4

I'm disinclined to assume that if men don't perform "emotional expression" in a way similar or satisfactory to women that they're doing it wrong. Certainly some men might find it helpful to express their emotions in a way more like women (and vice versa) and those people should be able to do that. Doesn't mean that dudes who express/process sadness or frustration through physical activity rather than crying into a pillow need to change.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 05:10 AM
2

The business world, women CEOs, Getting promotions There have been a couple high profile analyses (e.g., Damore at Google, Strumia at CERN) showing that women are on average younger, with less experience, with fewer accomplishments, etc. than similarly positioned men. Earning more on average than women Men working 45 hours/week being paid for working 45 hours and women working 34 hours/week and being paid for working 34 hours will result in men "earning more on average than women". The more rele…
/r/MensRights25/11/19 04:28 AM
5

Does this negate the horrible stuff that happens to women? Nope. More importantly, it doesn't negate the horrible stuff when it happens to men, too. Pointing out that the law recognizes horrible stuff as "sexual assault crimes" only if the perpetrator is male and/or victim is female, that at least half of the victims of "horrible stuff" are denied justice, doesn't lay a foundation for the claims you're trying to make.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 04:04 AM
1

It can be super difficult to break the habits you developed to mollify an abusive and manipulative person just so your life would be bearable. A new partners might not even try to help you with it, since your over-accommodating habits benefit them.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 02:38 AM
1

"Sexual intercourse" has its ordinary meaning and occurs upon any penetration, however slight. Just reading the statutes doesn't necessarily give you the full picture. The wording of that could be interpreted to include the scenario where the rapist penetrates her vagina with the victim's penis without his consent, so it's not 100% obvious that a woman raping a man would not be recognized as rape in most cases.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:24 AM
1

Who run Bartertown?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 12:03 AM
1

(x²+y²-1)³-x²y³<0
/r/MensRights24/11/19 10:16 AM
18

He sounds kind of insensitive, but it also sounds like the 15 year old is being a brat and is pouting about not getting her way rather than authentically upset at being excluded... in which case being tired of her shit is understandable. From his other comments, this is the first/only "father-son bonding trip" they've been on, and otherwise have had family vacations. Haven't seen an answer to what was planned for the trip or why he thinks she wouldn't have enjoyed it or where this idea for a "fa…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 10:08 AM
1

I feel like this sub is a tad bit misogynistic. Anyone have a link on hand to one of the studies showing people are generally unable to distinguish between the lack of (benevolent) sexism and the presence of (hostile) sexism, meaning most people perceive gender neutrality to be a tad bit misogynistic?
/r/MensRights24/11/19 09:20 AM
2

I have two sons. The older one is circumcised, the younger one is intact. Whatever supercrunchy online moms-to-be group my ex-wife was a part of had someone start a debate and, as had become their habit, she called me in to read it all and then summarize and settle it. Lotta dueling statistics about STDs, penile cancer, UTI rates, medical complications, etc. Synthesized all that into a nice table, found that the medical risks and the medical benefits exactly balanced each other out, and since yo…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:53 AM
5

most of the women I have ever spoken to about it are really grossed out/turned off by uncircumcised penises Most women I've spoken to who claimed to be really grossed out/turned off by uncircumcised penises didn't know how to tell them apart while erect and several realized they'd already had an uncircumcised partner without knowing and had no issues at the time.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:26 AM
1

TBH, I'd probably interpret her changing the initial request for seperate checks to having everything put on one bill as her indicating she planned to pay for everything. Which means I'd probably being thanking her for paying and giving her some low-key praise for making a material effort to achieve gender equality, rather than asking WTF like the dude there did. I'm curious if the girl is enough of an asshole that she'd still explain that she's a sack of shit and asked for one check with no pla…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:04 AM
10

This change started with the Pensions Act 1995 where the plan was for women's pension age to increase from 60 to 65 over a period from 2010 to 2020, and then for pension age (for everyone) to increase by one year every two years until such time as some predicted budgetary demographic bomb was defused. After the increases towards gender parity began, the schedule of pension age increases was re-evaluated, giving us the Pensions Act 2011 which accelerated rate from 1 year per 2 years, to 1 year pe…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 07:30 AM
2

Do you mean a specific example where "gendered analysis" determined that males were disadvantaged and policies were altered for the explicit purpose of addressing the identified disparate impact? Because, for that, I got nothin'. There are a few examples where systemic unfairness that has primarily affected men for decades (or more) has recently started to claim a few female victims so suddenly there's urgency to Do Something. E.g., Alimony Reform. Mexico's high court just recently ended their "…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:19 AM
2

In my experience, it seems like most Men's-Rights-inclined folks would prefer gender equal reproductive rights rather than achieving gender equality in this area by bringing women's rights down to be equal to men's. So if you're hoping to springboard this into ginning up opposition to reproductive rights... that's probably not going to be successful here.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:00 AM
0

AFAIK Ted Bundy didn't have an abusive mother.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 01:51 PM
3

Is this a general complaint about the "very loose workshop type class dominated by men", or a complaint specifically about you?
/r/MensRights23/11/19 08:35 AM
17

Curiously, the prevalence and severity of "male violence" seems to directly correlate with boys who had women (e.g., their divorced/single mothers) as their primary adult model for impulse control and emotional self-regulation. kermit_sipping_tea.jpg
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:53 AM
3

There are other materials being considered that don't "clog a hose", but create a surface-reactive area that renders the sperm ineffective.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:49 AM
1

I'd wager you're not going to see much official support for that solution.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:46 AM
0

I quite enjoy the other thread where a bunch of accounts that appear to have never participated in this subreddit arrive to gushingly agree with each other about how this is totally a real thing.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:35 AM
1

I suppose it's a slightly new way of trying to make women feel better about being undatable incels.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:11 AM
3

Archive - https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.powerofpositivity.com/reasons-men-cant-handle-strong-woman/
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:09 AM
1

Each year in the US, approximately 140k children become the newest victims of paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 09:02 AM
1

gender inequity as a driver of violence against women That's a fascinating way of saying that lack of appropriate services for male victims and their children results in men having to stop the abuse by the only means bigoted organizations like White Ribbon will permit, to say nothing of trapping abusive women in an escalating cycle of violence by denying women necessary mental health treatment to stop abusing their intimate partners. But, OTOH, when your level of corpirate income can be directly…
/r/MensRights22/11/19 08:58 AM
1

It's a second injection that causes the SMA to depolymerize so it can be naturally flushed from the body. IIRC, normal fertility was restored usually within a few weeks.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 06:42 AM
1

The sex ratio of live births is 105:100. The sex ratio at fertilization presumably skews even further male, but any embryo that doesn't get an adequately functional X-chromosome from mom would spontaneously abort. Infant and pediatric mortality in males is a good bit higher than females, so the sex ratio is down to 103:100 by age five. Then there's a pretty steady trend in slightly higher male mortality. The sex ratio reaches parity around age 40 and then continues to skew more female at the sam…
/r/MensRights22/11/19 06:35 AM
1

Why not? It's something you'd only need to do once every 10-15 years.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 06:24 AM
1

An interesting thing about the obstructive polymer contraceptives is that it should be possible to adapt them to be injected into the fallopian tubes as well, meaning women might have new birth control options that don't fuck with their hormones if the feminists stop opposing reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 06:22 AM
2

When I wanted to talk to a particular ex, I'd write it all out and email it to myself. Since it all ended up as one long email chain, I'd occasionally go reread the previous things I'd written. While the stuff I'd just written had usually given me a nice dose of perspective, rereading the older stuff, when I was not so far along in overcoming my addiction to (the idea of) her was almost comically cathartic at times. So, you know, keep this and reread it in a month or two and laugh at the excuses…
/r/MensRights22/11/19 05:04 AM
6

Novel idea: Let the person whose genitals will being getting cut up make the decision for themselves.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 08:04 PM
1

Many women who have been circumcised make similar claims of preferring it, their partners preferring it, and defend the practice on all around equivalent grounds. Would you plan on circumcising your daughter? Why not?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 07:54 PM
1

https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:09 PM
2

Using data from the 2017 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" and are thus excluded from the CDC's NISVS discussion of "Rape". Fr…
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:02 PM
-2

/TRP was created by Something Awful as a feminism-LARPing-as-PUA satire sub. "Red Pill Theory" is fundamentally just Feminism 101 translated into PUA jargon. Part of why it seemed to appear out of nowhere and grow so quickly was because a lot of people were in on the joke... and for all the people not in on the joke it was seductive because it was the same things they'd been hearing everywhere else and thus were conceptually unchallenging to accept, but repackaged in a way that sounded edgy and …
/r/MensRights21/11/19 01:55 PM
1

Inserted into your ear canal, bb. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/MensRights18/11/19 06:39 AM
1

Average size, probably, but I'd expect a lot of overlap in the distributions, as with, say, height. In any case, the "T-shape" flare is larger diameter, but the part that would actually be poked in your earballs looks to be the same size.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 10:23 AM
21

Ever notice how when a woman is doing self-destructive behavior, she maintains a cult of secrecy around her misdeeds and poor decisions? Has this asshole never looked at social media? Just because a woman gets likes and "You go girl!" comments from her followers doesn't transmute it to not self-destructive. To say nothing of the slavering horde of Nice Guys incels male feminists offering their "help" when the damage finally becomes too much. They never breakdown in public Supporting characters a…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 10:17 AM
21

Thinking a television character intentionally designed as grotesquely dysfunctional is an accurate proxy for all men isn't normal, but on feminism it is. Feminism. Not even once.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:49 AM
8

Link to the archive of the article.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:47 AM
1

12 pairs rather than 10. 32dB reduction rather than 30dB. $4.49 rather than $4.99. Am I missing something? Is this some kind of corporate marketing experiment to see if dudes won't buy an apparently objectively-better-in-every-way product simply because it's putatively 'for women'?
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:25 AM
1

just force government statisticians to classify all tranfers of wealth properly as a form of pay! Will never happen. Actually, you can see the trend of the opposite happening, because if the government counts the money involved in wealth transfers as the payor's income rather than the payee's income it's usually in a higher tax bracket.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:15 AM
1

The data on gay men is conflicting (sources go both ways). That's kind of a predictable result, though. Some gay men have the mindset of expecting to provide for a partner; some gay men have the mindset of expecting a partner to provide for them. There is data showing that single men earn less than married men but this is because women select for men who earn more money. I was looking up statistical data on hours worked per week by age and gender a while ago and one of the tables I found had a s…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:09 AM
2

Also, users sometimes get flaired for good effortposting and then have ENDORSED CONTRIBUTOR on all their random shitposting, too.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 08:44 AM
5

If you're an adult with no kids it's easy- but I have three kids and my wife works long hours so I have to do most of the cleaning, laundry, cooking- it's a tremendous amount of work. Unless something magical happens between having two and having three kids (which I will grant is a possibility), I'm going to say this was not my experience and have to disagree. There's a lot of "Oh god, I have to do this shit again?", but, ayy, if you didn't wanna clean up after a small horde of tiny incapable hu…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 08:16 AM
1

First, it assumes that this trade-off is voluntary, and not one that is enforced primarily by women, who often prefer to be in charge around the house. Studies indicate that women very often wrest control from men, sometimes aggressively, and that men are forced to take a back seat in most relationships Current girlfriend washes whatever dishes are in the sink whenever she comes over. Which isn't especially odd, per se; I used to wash a previous GFs dishes whenever I visited her place. But that …
/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:56 AM
1

You can have five people who understand your process (and fill out a checklist) for $500k. OR You can have two people who understand spreadsheets and three people who only know how to edit cells for $420k. And you still need five ~$100k employees who understand your process, because you were never paying them that much for filling out a checklist. Like I said, y'all keep doing what you're doing.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:02 AM
1

In fact, the majority of custody settlements – even those that favor the mother – are reached by mutual agreements outside of the courtroom. That means that both parties agree in these situations that the mother should have custody. Oh! Like the large racial disparities in conviction and sentencing being a result of plea bargains reached by mutual agreement outside of the court room. Whew. Good to know we never have to worry about addressing that ever again, since it's "self-imposed".
/r/MensRights17/11/19 06:30 AM
1

Section 5 of the Sexual Orientation Anti-Discrimination Act (Norwegian: Diskrimineringsloven om seksuell orientering), enacted in 2013, states as follows: Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression shall be prohibited. The prohibition shall apply to discrimination on the basis of actual, assumed, former or future sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. "Discrimination" shall mean direct and indirect differential treatment that is not…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 06:07 AM
1

You cannot eat 20 lbs of bacon a day and maintain weight. Sure. But "eat all you want" keto probably would not result in you eating 20lbs of bacon per day. Because you wouldn't be hungry enough throughout the day to want to keep eating your 20lb allotment of bacon. I'm not sure someone on a hypothetical anti-keto diet could make it through 9lbs of sugar per day, either, but, due to the way all the feedback systems work, they'd probably get a lot further into their daily ration than the person wi…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 05:17 AM
3

Height is purely genetics. Height is also childhood nutrition. Still not something they could control, in most cases...
/r/MensRights17/11/19 05:01 AM
1

I'm not seeing the part where they've found the genes that allow someone to violate the laws of thermodynamics. Certainly there are genetic factors that can make it harder for someone to maintain a caloric deficit (e.g., low basal metabolism, feeling hungry more, requiring more food to feel satisfied, etc), but you can still choose to use your big ape brain to adjust what you eat to adjust how much you weigh. You can't adjust the length of your bones by sheer willpower.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 04:56 AM
1

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, in 2007, there were 5228 men and 429 women. 5228/429 + 2007 = 2019.18648 The 68th day of 2019. Thus, March 9th, 2019, was Equal Occupational Fatality Day for 2007. #EOFD2007. June 20th, 2020, will be #EOFD2008. (4827/387+2008) August 1st, 2021, for #EOFD2009. (4216/335+2009) September 28th, 2021, for #EOFD2010. (4322/368+2010) 4308/385+2011 4277/351+2012 4265/319+2013 4454/367+2014 Not adjusting for leap years an…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 03:03 AM
3

The interval between saying the estimate sounded okay and "I saw on your profile..." is described by the CBOP as "five minutes", so pretty much seems to be a continuous conversation/negotiation.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 09:21 AM
5

I believe the thought terminating cliche for this situation is "Freedom of Speech does not mean freedom from consequences." The interval between "Ok that's fine by me" and "I saw on your profile..." is described by CBOP as "five minutes". I would not interpret someone acknowledging that they were okay with my estimate as a greenlight to immediately start billable work without hashing out details of expected delivery timelines (or exact billing details, for that matter). Not to be mixing my subre…
/r/MensRights16/11/19 09:16 AM
1

if you give me a task with a checklist a clipboard and a pencil - I will program the computer to do the work for me - a one off task that kills the manual work forever. I can then move on. OTOH I swear there are women still using those checklists from a decade ago. Same salary - no comparison on efficiency. And then the requirements change. Nearly anyone could've updated the paper checklist and sharpened the pencils, but your spreadsheet from a decade ago that you wrote before you "moved on" has…
/r/MensRights16/11/19 07:24 AM
1

We should balance #EqualPayDay with #EqualWorkDay, y'know, to mark the difference in number of hours worked. They almost always fall within a day or two of each other. Maybe note that #EqualWorkplaceFatalityDay (for several years ago) is coming up REAL SOON NOW
/r/MensRights16/11/19 07:09 AM
1

They never get assigned production bugs (or any bugs) and when I assign them one, they assign it to some other male engineer. When they rank us up for promotion they have literally given to women credit to stuff I had to do myself. Sounds like keeping better track of who is doing the work and accomplishing what needs to get done might be a way to make sure everyone is playing on a level field.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 03:46 AM
2

Which would thus push the initial conditioning of the behaviour back before the girls school, since he was already acting that way. A common origin story of incels is being raised by an abusive (often single/divorced) mother, but there's no indications of that in the story; the character's parents appear to still be together when it mentions them asking about his life.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 03:33 AM
5

They just call them slangs like "randi" which means prostitute out of jealousy which is so wrong. I dunno. It's apparently not uncommon for instagram thots to turn to less ambiguous forms of sex work when they start getting replaced by a newer crop of online sex workers.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 03:19 AM
2

The seams of the pockets on standard US Navy coveralls would rip out pretty quick because they were just a second layer of fabric sewn onto the front of the leg with no sort of accordion fold to accommodate actually putting anything in them. Rather than making a video or blog post or angry feminist rant about how this was a patriarchal conspiracy to get the Uniform Regs changed to issue servicemembers a purse I... you'll never guess... used a sewing machine to preemptively reinforce the pocket s…
/r/MensRights16/11/19 02:54 AM
2

You can get quite a lot of raw data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (US) or StatsCan (Canada).
/r/MensRights16/11/19 02:19 AM
3

Don't touch the poop.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 02:02 AM
1

Heinous.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 02:02 AM
1

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/press-f-to-pay-respects
/r/MensRights16/11/19 02:01 AM
1

(See other reply.)
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:31 AM
1

(See other reply.)
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:31 AM
1

A trouble with focusing on the adult male victims is the empathy gap means people don't really give a shit about adult male victims, and thus won't care about the problem. Do point out that forcing one of the perpetrator's other victims to mitigate the harm cause by her fraud is a ridiculous suggestion, though.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:29 AM
1

Observing the behaviour of women when there aren't a significant number of men around sounds like the least probable thing to create a genuine affinity for traditionalism/feminism.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:17 AM
4

Read more than the abstract, then. For disputed paternity tests median levels of PD across 16 studies is 26.9% (interquartile range (IQR) = 16.7%–33.4%). However, being based on cases where PD was already suspected this inevitably overestimates population levels (table 1). For studies based on populations chosen for reasons other than disputed paternity (table 1) median PD is 3.7% (IQR = 2.0%–9.6%). While this is not a measure of population prevalence it does suggest the widely used (but unsubst…
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:07 AM
3

No one, literally no one, has high standards of behavior all the time in all circumstances. Sure. The problem arises when someone is lacking good judgement to the extent where their lapses in standards of behavior overlap and coinincide with unfortunately public circumstances. Getting drunk and disorderly in privacy: okay. Walking to get fast food at 3am: okay. Combining the behaviors and the circumstances: bad idea jeans.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 10:09 AM
1

Current estimates put it at 3.7%. Or, put another way, every year approximately 140k US children become the newest victims of paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 09:43 AM
1

It's lacking an explanation for who or what conditioned him to find the traditionalist/feminist worldview plausible.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 09:37 AM
1

He also reads that children bear trace amounts of the DNA of all their mother’s sex partners in their own DNA—so it was true, confirming suspicions he didn’t even know he had, that sex partners matter biologically; they leave a mark. This sentence seemed out of place.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 09:33 AM
4

Site has a privacy error (security certificate is from weebly.com).
/r/MensRights15/11/19 08:34 AM
13

The child died apparently as a result of being repeatedly splashed with scalding-hot water. As we all know, women are unable to perform the extreme feat of strength required in the lifting of a tea cup...
/r/MensRights15/11/19 08:29 AM
4

I don't get the impression there are a lot of women in country music, so, all else being equal, you wouldn't expect women to win CMAs as often as men. Quick search for chart stats puts women at about 16%. Sloppy math incoming. Underwood winning or not, based on Swift winning in 2011, put the rate of women winning between 11-22%. I.e., 16.5% to take the midpoint, utterly unremarkable. Slightly less sloppy math, the chance of a woman not winning since 2012-2019 is about 24%, so, still utterly unre…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 08:23 AM
11

What do you think would happen if the genders were reversed? "everyone" would laugh and clap, but probably think about it a bit more due to the second part.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:54 AM
6

Yes, (some) women do behave that way. If you're unable to acknowledge that and feel safer to retreat to a strawman about universalizing a scoped generalization, that's okay. Men and women being looked at as equals can be pretty disorienting if all you've ever known are traditionalist/feminist perspectives stuck in gender malagency. And, again, (as I said in my first comment to you) I get the impression the sentiment is closer to disappointment.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:47 AM
2

I looked in OP's user history and [he's talking about The Red Pill]. I love ate-the-onion content as much as the next person, but I don't think feminism-LARPing-as-PUA is a valid basis for a discussion of "Hateful MRAs". I mean, yes, Red Pill Theory was a bit more involved than lazy swap-the-pronouns satire or "Meninism" and has mutated a good bit, but that post is literally an inversion of Feminism 101 "All Men Are Rapists".
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:35 AM
5

We aren't hunter/gatherers anymore. Women who are "only good for sex" aren't good enough. Step up your game. women are only good for sex and that there's no other reason to deal with them aside from sex. That is gross and dehumanizing. Indeed. Maybe women should stop behaving that way and men should stop enabling them. you guys really have some toxic and disrespectful views on women. that's just the truth You seem to be afflicted by the inverse is-ought fallacy. These various comments trying to …
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:21 AM
3

It's MRAs that are saying women are only good for sex. It's a woman who only brings sex to the table who is saying she is only good for sex. Pretty disturbing you hate women enough to agree with such a sentiment. Expecting women to be more than "only good for sex", to bring more than their holes to the table, wanting women to behave as equals is hating women? It's also clearly about bitterness and hatred towards women, otherwise so many of you wouldn't be agreeing with this disgusting view. Wome…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:56 AM
4

We discovered that just one in four millennial females (26%) had an annual (pre-tax) income above £30,000, compared to 34% of male flatsharers. So, using this "wage gap" as our pivot, we should expect the men's statistics to differ from women's by a factor of 0.89, all else being equal. one in four women (or 27%) spend over half of their monthly pay on rent, compared to just 17% of men. The predicted value from the above pivot is one in four (or 24%) of men. Meaning men are choosing to live with…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:32 AM
–

It is "pretty gross" that (some) women believe that sex is all they have to bring to the table and it is "pretty gross" that, quite often, they're correct. Are you misplacing your disgust at this reality being laid bare as disgust at the messenger who speaks so plainly?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:10 AM
-6

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Whether she is transgender or merely percieved as transgender is kind of academic if it comes to a couple dudes hopping out of their SUV intent on curb stomping her because she made 'em feel uncomfortable in their bathing suit area.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:54 AM
–

a comment from the post right below this topic Using pagerank-relational descriptions for a continuously resorted list is not a great choice for citing a source. Here's a link. the subject being men feeling entitled to sex I was kind of surprised it was a top-level comment because it reads like a reply, which is why I went looking for the context. The largest discussion thread on that post is about a different AITA post where a girl was complaining about how her apparently-well-to-do boyfriend (…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:34 AM
4

Most of the time in my experience when people have been able to specific enough claims about "hate speech and sexism within the MRA community" that the comments in question can be traced down, it's explicitly anti-MRA PUA bloggers, explicitly identified or extremely obvious satire or other pisstake, or is some kind of bizarre fantasy misinterpretation on a feminist/troll site. Occasionally, you do have people who are rightfully angry about witnessing or experiencing child abuse, sexual abuse, do…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:23 AM
1

> female [ X ] Doubt.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 02:28 AM
20

One sneaky trick: get a ladyfriend to ask transwomen if they're huge.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 02:16 AM
1

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality/lcwk1.htm https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa-cause-of-death-by-age-and-gender
/r/MensRights15/11/19 02:11 AM
2

The sex ratio of live births is +4-5% in favor of males. Males consistently die at higher rates, so the sex ratio reaches parity by about 40 years and continues to skew gradually more female until the difference in life expectancy really ramps up the difference. In a neonatal/pediatric context, it probably would be a correct perception that a disproportionately high number of her patients are boys and that they have worse outcomes.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 02:10 AM
4

Resurrecting the "bachelor tax"?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 01:41 AM
3

Male athletes who gender-transition to compete against women are consistently pretty stark reminders of just how patronizing "womens sports" is. Players who ranked somewhere in the weeds of the multiple hundreds when competing against men take a year off to transition, then come back and are, quite often, top ranked players by a considerable margin. Or in cases where it's a standardized test of athleticism as with various track&field events you can compare high school boys vs. olympic women athe…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:50 PM
1

In some contexts, yes, the claim may be true in terms of slight differences in average performance by gender.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:36 PM
4

\/r\/RaisedByNarcissists in case you don't already know it.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:33 PM
1

Considering differences in pay are generally attributable to differences in hours worked, just allowing people to see each other's pay stubs (whether in a gender equal method or in the gender bigoted fashion the charity suggests) will probably give folks an incomplete understanding of pay differences.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:30 PM
1

You only need to look at the nearest "Where have all the good men gone?" and/or "they must be intimidated by strong independent women" article to understand that the likelihood of women accepting the role of providers in order to attract andnsupport a mate is... unlikely. Men checking out of the game and resisting being exploited for their excess productivity, whether they have ever heard of "MGTOW" or not, and the existential threat this presents to the governments and systems that have grown f…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:25 PM
1

It's interesting to think that every decade nearly 20% of your life that you traded for money is taken from you to subsidize the risky debt of bankers. And that's just the monetary system. It's even more when you take into account corporate welfare.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:16 AM
1

Any thoughts? "Cumulative fiscal incidence." The on-going existence and functioning of society relies on men, as a demographic group, over the course of their lives, producing more than they consume.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:34 AM
2

Provincial human rights tribunal complaint under the UN Rights of the Child treaty?
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:10 AM
1

\/r\/CuteFemaleCorpses would like a word...
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:57 AM
2

The worst part is that there are so many perfectly suitable women's scarves just right across the aisle, but salespeople have shoot-on-sight orders for unaccompanied males and even if you get a female coconspirator to cover for you, the cashier will still insist on a genital verification at check-out. Oh, wait, none of that happens and a man can buy a fluffy hot pink faux fur jacket and matching thong panties in his size if he wants. Or a "women's scarf".
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:44 AM
26

It's also a narcissistic fantasy: That she's so irresistibly desirable that any random Uber driver would not only pass up other fares but commit a crime just to spend time with her. In reality, no one is remotely that interested.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:21 AM
10

🗹 First they ignore you. 🗹 Then they laugh at you. 🗹 Then they fight you. ☐ Then you win.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 12:29 AM
1

Thank you for visiting.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:29 PM
0

That would be a bizarre interpretation of the content of the video, seemingly just to make a "transphobic" remark.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:28 PM
1

Do I really have to explain this to you? I doubt you're going to say anything I haven't heard before, I'm just in interested in having you describe your attitudes and opinions in your own words so we have something concrete to analyze together. I already gave one reason. And I already gave you one rebuttal. You apparently didn't bother to watch it. The other is girls can get pregnant. Women who rape children can get pregnant by boys.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:25 PM
1

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/30/section/6
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:11 PM
8

That thread probably was what attracted mod attention. This one seems more likely to have been the straw that broke the camel's back. There is a difference between victims and victimizers, you are part of the latter and that is why nobody will take you seriously. The account pretty clearly comes across as a concern troll's alt. Net-negative karma. The usual "This only reinforces the bad image that the people have of this subreddit.", "Can someone explain me what this has to do with men's rights?…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:33 AM
1

a guy feels like a Big Swinging Dick and is happy to be getting his dick wet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikd0ZYQoDko
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:04 AM
1

It's nit the same thing Unpack that. Why do you think it's "not the same"?
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:02 AM
1

If I was say 14 or older and a hot 20-something teacher started having sex with me, I'd be ecstatic. Am I the odd man out here? Nah. Nearly every story about a boy being raped by an adult he trusted in while she was in a position of authority over him has a comment section full of people like you sharing these kinds of child rape fantasies.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 01:51 AM
3

It's probably a pass-through storefront where the product is semi-custom made after someone has placed an order, and thus they give you the option of putting a chosen graphic/slogan on every size of shirt (and mouse pads, coffee cups, seven different kinds of hats, stickers, decals, keychains, pens, stress balls, flags, sweatshirts, skirts, panties, onsies, bibs, etc.).
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:03 PM
6

maybe it’s due to the fact that on average, men work more hours than women The Bureau of Labor Statistics keeps track of hours worked, y'know. So you can take all the hours that men work, and all the hours that the women work, and divide them, too. It comes out pretty close to parity for every year I've tried it: "For every $1 earned by men, women earn $1.02." StatsCan has a similar set of information products for America's Hat and it yields the same slight-overparity result when I've bothered t…
/r/MensRights10/11/19 03:46 PM
1

"He's never had to live as a woman-of-color, so he doesn't know my life. I've never lived as a white man, but I think of myself as an authority on the topic."
/r/MensRights10/11/19 01:34 AM
4

Women generally have a higher average on standardized tests for language ability... but presumably the top ranked people in a poetry competition do not represent average language ability, so, as a population of highest skill outliers, you should expect to see some gender skew towards men due to greater male variability. OTOH, poetry in general and/or this poetry competition in particular might not attract the highest skill outliers, so maybe the best authors are all off writing the next Great Am…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 12:54 PM
1

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I am bereft.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 12:19 PM
1

One of the more interesting Terminator universe theories I've heard was that everything that keeps happening with the timeline is because at some subsequent date far after the War Against the Machines has been lost by the humans, the AI eventually realizes it was all a misunderstanding and it's devoted its existence to undoing its mistake. It creates John Connor to try to give humanity a chance, but that modifies future histories, and it just keeps running iterations until, inevitably, the Machi…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 09:40 AM
1

Guess who the Curie, a standardized unit for measuring radioactivity, is named after?
/r/MensRights09/11/19 09:31 AM
3

female on male rape is fairly rare compared to other forms of rape Using data from the 2017 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" …
/r/MensRights09/11/19 07:16 AM
6

I don't want to have my overall payment increased This is not the way to do that. You can look up whatever NYC has for their local equivalent Office of Child Support Enforcement and ask someone there about where the money goes if someone overpays. It would probably be in the child's best interests for you to put whatever you've mentally earmarked as their share of this transient extra income aside, so that if/when there's some quarter where you don't have any "very good deals" they can continue …
/r/MensRights09/11/19 06:21 AM
5

Whether the word for what she did is "rape" may be less important for your personal recovery than knowing what she did (whatever you choose to call it) was not and is not okay. She put you in scenarios where even the best choices that seemed available to you were not good ones. You feel bad about what happened because she did something bad to you. The one who needed to do better in the situations she created was her.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 04:19 AM
1

I was never particularly engaged with SA goon culture, preferring the aggressive anonymity of the chans, so the idea of "valuable posters" isn't one I would've shared or paid too much attention. Or were these "valuable posters" useful idiots from the outside PUA cargo cult?
/r/MensRights09/11/19 03:48 AM
1

Why is a woman being unable to conceive of using a tool to protect life presented as some kind of universal male foible? Her mind being unable to process beyond using a tool for destruction provides a possible example for why the creators of named inventions are so often men. And what's the big counter claim about the creative capacity of women? A purely biological process of the body. Bravo. You're the unrivalled creative equal of any other female mammal. And, by the way, when women's agency is…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 03:39 AM
1

Except you're arguing in favor of throwing men's humanity out the window, I am not. Help men first, acknowledge men as human beings. It's okay to just want to help men, men are people too. Except it's not okay to help men first. And you're not going to change that by direct engagement, because it is so obviously wrong that people who are explicitly challenged on it are more likely to solidify their defense of the position than have an epiphany. You can successfully deliver the "it's okay to help…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 03:16 AM
1

I had no personal investment in the TRP op, so, no, not that I recall. It usually wasn't clear what was astroturf by goon-alts and what was authentic useful-idiot content. And don't call me Shirley.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 02:46 AM
1

What is supposedly edgy about that?
/r/MensRights09/11/19 02:28 AM
1

It's an attempt to counter-balance the Redpill tactics in the Redpill subreddit. TRP was created by a Something Awful goon satire op themed on feminism-LARPing-as-PUA. Source: I was friends with one of the girl tangentially involved in the planning and helped with the initial translations of Feminism 101 into "Red Pill Theory". I do not get the impression FDS has that meta-awareness in it's supposed "counter-balance" and is instead doubling down on the feminist misogyny and swapping some pronoun…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 12:13 AM
1

It's satire. I know. So was /TheRedPill circa 2013.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 12:02 AM
1

So men without children aren't people worthy of love and respect? It's terrible that you think that! That's what we're trying to overcome! What's wrong with you? That's what this conversation has been like. You're saying that men are worthless unless value is "applied" by an outside force, No. I'm pointing that due to the empathy gap men are percieved that way, so getting people to care about making changes to inequalities that affect a dehumanized population usually requires framing the problem…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 11:56 PM
0

k.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:37 PM
1

The point is to not take an hour to simmer, but still get something significantly better than mass produced shit from a jar.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:09 PM
11

Once you realize it's all based around the belief that women's choices and actions shouldn't matter, you'll see the apparent contradictions resolve themselves.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 09:20 AM
1

Is "female dating strategy" a strategy for dating females or a dating strategy for females? 🤔
/r/MensRights08/11/19 09:18 AM
1

She was probably just used to heating up a "condensed" premade sauce and didn't read the directions on whatever you had to see it didn't need water added. But why bother with premade pasta sauce at all? Brown some ground beef with a diced onion, throw in some tomato paste and whatever spices you like. You can make this while waiting for the pot of water for the pasta to come to a boil and it's miles better.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:44 AM
2

Bravery Level: So.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:38 AM
4

I've definitely decided to have a bowl (or two) of cereal for dinner on some of the days where I get back home 18 hours after I left for work and have to be awake and ready to do it all again in six hours. Seems like there's not a lot of middle-ground in how men make food. It's usually either something that can be made and eaten in 5-10 minutes before collapsing to sleep or a commitment to converting various raw materials into a culinary gestalt phenomenon. Never known a guy who'd plop jarred sp…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:36 AM
4

The thing about Poe's LARP-subs like TRP or FDS is that they eventually become self-licking ice cream cones if they're done well enough to attract a critical mass of people who aren't in on the joke.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 05:41 AM
2

Bad bot.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:26 AM
1

OkTrends had another frequently-salt-producing post focused on how reply rates vary by the races of the sender and recipient. Notice there that the overall reply-rate for women (42.0%) is quite a bit higher than the reply-rate for men (27.6%), but the "your looks" blog post appears to have male senders having a higher reply-rate than female senders for their "attractiveness groups" rainbow graphs. Similarly, the "message multiplier" graph does not appear to be adjusted in any way to account for …
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:24 AM
2

how do you explain stuff like this? Go find and read the study. Male evaluators substantially treated both candidate resumes similarly. The alleged bias against "Jennifer" came primarily (exclusively?) from female evaluators. It's probably over-simplistic to just say "Women are bigots." and leave it at that, particularly since similar experiments have found different results.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:39 AM
1

\/r\/OddlySpecific. Male Feminist: a guy who reads the hateful screed of how some dysfunctional women imagine men to be and says to himself "Oh, that is so me."
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:04 AM
2

The NISVS questionnaire and coding methods are available on the CDC website. The raw statistics for "Rape" and "Made-to-Penetrate" derive from the exact same questions. The difference in categorization is substantially a product of the genders of the victim and perpetrator of nonconsensual sex. The argument for differentiating the different ways a victim can be raped into separate categories isn't a bad one per se, mind you, there's just no reason it should be applied only to male victims. And i…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 12:22 AM
1

Reducing the number of abortions that happen is something I think most people would agree is a Good Thing. That it would be better to achieve that by preventing unwanted pregnancies rather than forcing unwanted children into existence is another point of common ground. Where people start to diverge is when it comes to how to achieve those shared goals.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:51 PM
1

Unfortunately, prioritizing support for gender equality may be the best way to get "pro-choice" people to stop opposing reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 08:47 AM
1

Suppose the 2020 slogan is "Der Endlosung Die Judenfrage". Are you going to be making "several decades ago" excuses for that as well, or do you think using the phrase of a genocidal hate ideology from the 1940s is a, y'know, kind of explicitly obviously a callback to that genocidal hate ideology from the 1940s? Certainly you could try to argue that Gender Studies is this fringe multibillion dollar thing nobody's ever heard of, so you can hardly expect a major party presidential campaign that's s…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 08:37 AM
1

Convert dollars costs into the hours of life consumed to pay them. If both of you working 20 hours each brings in enough money to pay the bills, huzzah, you've split the time 50/50. But if "he is making 35% more than me" is because he works 35% more hours than you, there's no reason he should spend his life working those extra hours to help you pay your half of the bills. Note: over longer term relationships, the "equal time" method can begin to skew unfairly if one partner takes safers, cleaner…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 07:57 AM
3

I wonder if the same holds true for women who abuse men.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 07:37 AM
1

Gender equal reproductive rights are definitely the way most people would prefer to go, but every day as "pro-choice" opposition to reproductive rights continues, it becomes more likely that we'll end up taking a step backwards towards gender equality by revoking the contradictory exceptions made for abortion/adoption/abandonment and bring women's rights down to be equal to men's. Don't like that future? Stop opposing reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 07:33 AM
1

Get back to us when you have to use your body to support an unwanted child for 18+ years and have your body torn up in the process.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 07:27 AM
1

The idea that a man should have right to choose whether a fetus is gestated or aborted relies heavily on the violation of reproductive rights in the case of nonconsensual parenthood (i.e., where he is forced to use his body to support an unwanted child). With gender equal reproductive rights, it is affirmed that no one should be forced into nonconsensual parenthood and that every person has the right to choose to be, or not to be, a parent. With this, no responsibilities are imposed on men or wo…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 07:21 AM
5

"As soon as I signed, he raped me." "I was so terrified, I'd have signed anything, then he raped me." The solution implemented by some extreme/fetish porn studios is to film the performers beforehand describing/discussing everything planned for the scene, and then film again after the scene where the performers confirm that they are satisfied with whatever just happened. You probably don't need to get into explicit details for plain ol' vanilla activities, but capturing video of a partner before…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:42 AM
2

Good bot.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:28 AM
3

s/polished/shitastic
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:27 AM
2

Try replacing the www.reddit.com with old.reddit.com in an URL. You may also have to disable subreddit CSS themes for the full old school experience. You can also try adding .compact at the end of an URL to see the original mobile interface.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:16 AM
1

"The Future is Female" was used during the 2016 presidential campaign of a major party candidate. As noted, Genocidal Feminism is the ideological foundation of "Gender Studies". Genocidal Feminism is the "tiny minority opinion" of politically and institutionally powerful mainstream feminism. I'm sure True Scottish Feminism totes denounces it and recites the dictionary at it.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:13 AM
3

If your current account is your first account, you possibly haven't been using reddit long enough to have seen the original design. Reddit has been trying to make the site more friendly to advertisers and more appealing to easily monetized demographics. This has meant moving away from the extremely information dense and minimalist design of the link aggregation site and towards a more granularized social-media user experience.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 02:17 PM
-6

Whether he had Instructions for Lizard People kitsch on his walls is not the important part of the linked document. The charitable interpretation of the saga is that CPS was working to get his daughter back to him and he fought them every step of the way by acting like a douchecanoe.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 01:34 PM
0

I have no feasible way of evaluating that claim. That you're posting your daughter's business all over the internet leads me to doubt you're as clever as you believe.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 09:40 AM
1

The foster home with seven kids may have a proven track record of safely and effectively dealing with psycho shit, while you do not? Or do have a track record proving contrary?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 09:29 AM
1

You are not required to have junk. The home passed the CPS walk-through safety check sans junk. Get the chip off your shoulder before you berate your way into never seeing your daughter again.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 08:59 AM
1

That was stuff she had told her mother. According to CPS records, it appears she really did kill a cat. That's some psycho shit, bro. It requires more than good dadding.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 08:51 AM
1

As a licensed doctor? Yes? You can be the hottest shit, most world renowned rocket surgeon on the planet and have exactly zero relevant skills to effectively handle a child with special needs. I'd expect you to be able to pick up those skills pretty quickly, as it's not rocket surgery, but that doesn't change that you may not have them at this moment. And if you're being an recalcitrant cunt about taking a CPS suggested parenting class because licensed doctor... yeah, stop doing that and take th…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 08:45 AM
1

What is the business about attempting to kill her mother, other children, and killing a cat? It's possible that CPS will not grant you custody because, even though your residence and capacities might be entirely sufficient to provide a normally accepted standard of care, the problem is that the child requires special care that you are not able to provide.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:55 AM
1

The home passed the CPS walk-through safety check. You do not need to defend the suitability of your home.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:51 AM
1

I’ll go to jail my first contempt hearing? Depends how your judge is feeling that day and whether you annoy them with some bullshit. It's more likely that they'll revoke your driving and/or barber's license before they jail you. If I have proof of her violating her contract (such as visitation refusal, change of insurance to cheaper insurance, change of address, change of school) will that help me? No. These things have nothing per se to do with your ability to pay court ordered support. Bringin…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:41 AM
–

Nope. And now we're another two pointless comments in, when you could've just clarified and added to the discussion.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:10 AM
10

There are a lot of people who enjoy recieving nonconsensual sexual activity in various contexts, both male and female, but that doesn't invalidate the reactions of people who aren't into it.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:51 AM
–

So we need to tell them how to think? No. How about we think for ourselves, based on everything within the relationship? This suggestion does nothing to prepare people for unexpected situations. It probably would not occur to most people to run through a hypothetical scenario where they discover their girlfriend fingers herself with their limp unconscious hand. Though, that sort of thought experiment is kind of academic, because you might hypothesize that you'd think of it as clumsy foreplay and…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:44 AM
–

Are you making a distinction between doing things to an unconscious person that would be sexually stimulating for them, but not necessarily for you, (e.g. stimulating the person's genitals with your hand) vs. things that are stimulating for you, but not necessarily for them (e.g., stimulating your genitals with the person's hand)? Or are you making a distinction between doing things to an unconscious person with the hope that they'll wake up and be ino it vs. doing things hoping they'll stay unc…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:34 AM
–

Is there any point where you think using an unconscious person's body for sexual gratification goes too far? If so, what is your line? Why do you draw it there?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 05:37 AM
–

Then again just lying there pretending to be asleep whole your gf is fingerbanging your hand is a bit weird too. Sounds like fight/flight/freeze, which isn't weird or uncommon at all when suddenly finding yourself in an unexpected situation with no historical/theoretical frame of reference. If uncomfortable just gently withdraw your hand and make mumbling noises or something; don't just lie there in judgement and then tell the whole internet. If no one ever tells the whole internet about women d…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 05:34 AM
1

Only the 1972 ERA ever passed both houses of Congress and was sent to the States for ratification. It was not ratified before the 1982 deadline. A 2020 ERA could pass both houses of Congress, but it would need to be ratified by ¾ths of the states. What states did with the 1972 ERA is legally irrelevant, the 2020 ERA would be a new/separate amendment.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:59 AM
1

I think you mean \/r\/againstmensrights as \/r\/antimensrights has already been banned.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:06 AM
1

Celebrities are usually pretty fucked up by the whole experience. Everyone you meet has a preconceived idea of who you're supposed to be, and mostly their ideas have no basis in reality. How many people do you think she's dealt with who were trying to get with Hermione? You become more cautious, try to filter out the starfuckers, but a distressingly large amount of time that just delays until the time comes when they wanna put on their robe and wizard hat. And the few that aren't may still be le…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:00 AM
2

Generalizations incoming. Due to gender malagency (i.e , male hyperagency and female hypoagency), whether clients feel that it is their responsibility to solve their own problems varies by gender. Thus, what sort of response client will find helpful varies by gender as well.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 02:34 AM
4

I remember seeing the thread that prompted that change. There was a mod telling someone "This violates Rule 10 in the sidebar." and a couple people replying to ask "What the hell does using NP links have to do with any of this?" Rather than bringing the old.reddit.com sidebar up to date, or editing it so it's just linking to something that would be kept up-to-date, they just put in the not-being-maintained message at the top. Since reddit has removed the ability of new accounts to opt out of the…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 01:48 AM
38

Match.com is $24-32/month, so that cuts out most of the non-desperate population and probably skews the sample population towards the profligate.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 01:15 AM
1

Have you actually asked these feminists - where is the endpoint? The founders of Gender Studies sketched out their plan for a Genocidal Feminist utopia 40-50 years ago: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race. The endpoint is the genocide of 45% of humanity.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 11:03 AM
0

I mean, you probably don't have to worry about the "old dad" problem if the second kid has Down's.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 01:40 AM
1

If you follow a null hypothesis to try to incorporate people who responded indicating both male and female perpetrators, the final statistic is the same as the result with only male or female perpetrators. There does not appear to be data is made available in the NISVS report to use any other model than the null hypothesis. You could bring in outside sources for cross reference, e.g., lesbian relationships have a higher rate of IPV than average and gay relationships have a lower rate of IPV than…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 10:03 PM
1

You may be trapped in Reddit Redesign hell. Try this one?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:57 AM
1

Using data from the 2017 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" and are thus excluded from the CDC's NISVS discussion of "Rape". Fr…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 01:53 AM
1

Note: the majority of rape victims are men.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 01:51 AM
6

If something unfairly benefits you, the system is technically unfair to you.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 12:17 AM
11

This is likely a violation of several building and health codes. Contact the relevant local code enforcement office(s) and ask them about it.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 12:15 AM
7

Research shows large unexplained gender disparities in federal criminal cases.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 12:10 AM
4

a reporter, media organisation or their 6 lawyers should not be at risk of a costs order unless he or she has engaged in reprehensible behaviour or has taken an unreasonable stance. or their 6 lawyers The 6 is a page number that got included in the cut&paste from the source document. No clarification as to what exactly is "reprehensible behavior" or "unreasonable stance". I do find it interesting that there is an automatic statutory restriction on making anything about maintenance and custody or…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 05:47 AM
3

OP is purely projecting his own predatory desires onto other men Being aware that a relationship has a high potential for issues and being concerned when you see someone you care about involved in one does not indicate that you secretly crave that sort of probably-doomed relationship for yourself. There's some hinkiness about AITAOP springing his interrogation on the dude when he had him alone rather than asking the couple about it openly. The line of questioning (particularly about the dude's k…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 05:25 AM
19

Agree and amplify. "Yeah, I have seen some studies showing that rape victims sometimes experience arousal, or even orgasm, while being raped, but I doubt you'd want someone telling you 'you probably liked it' and excusing the rapist if that happened to you." Help them realize what a total piece of shit they're being.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 02:11 AM
1

I think the first time I clicked the link the site played some abbreviated gallery preview that jumped to a different clip before anything happened.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 02:04 AM
0

And what are we supposed to be seeing happen in the literally circled part of the video?
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:55 AM
1

Gender wage gap: there is no gender wage gap, women are paid less than men because they work less hours, Confrontational and seemingly self-contradictory. Gender wage gap: the primary reason men work more and longer hours than women is because they need a bigger paycheck to be able to support their families. Congress: alright then, you want more women to be in congress right? Go ahead, sign up, go get a degree in political science and ban man-spreading. Unnecessarily antagonistic. You can defeat…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:53 AM
7

"Men have problems and they deserve to be fixed." MensRights: "they" refers to the problems. MensLib: "they" refers to the men. Bonus MensLib: "fixed" is the veterinary euphemism. MensLib's abject subordination to Feminist Ideology means that it can be expected to have the same counterproductive dysfunctional track record of reinforcing traditionalist/feminist gender malagency.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:16 AM
1

There is definitely a need for reform, but I suspect that if it looked like women would be held equally accountable for supporting children, that explicit or constructive abolition would be on the table. We've already seen this dynamic play out with spousal support.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:07 AM
0

What are we supposed to be seeing happen in this video?
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:04 AM
24

I applaud her efforts to combat the double standard by graciously accepting responsibility for the consequences of her choices and actions. /s
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:02 AM
1

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics has an annual Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries with some interesting numbers and charts. The 77¢ and $1 are edited in.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:59 AM
1

Using data from the 2017 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" and are thus excluded from the CDC's NISVS discussion of "Rape". Fr…
/r/MensRights31/10/19 12:11 AM
3

The belief that women's choices and actions don't or shouldn't matter. Female hypoagency. Gender malagency.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 11:38 PM
1

Your suggestion says "Who cares about men? Men are worthless!" No, it doesn't. It acknowledges the empathy gap and suggests framing gender issues that primarily affect men in ways that will bypass people's inability to recognize that an issue exists when it primarily affects men. Who cares about men? Their children. Won't someone think of the children!
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:03 AM
9

Because Men makes more money than Women right? The whole population level reason men work more and longer hours than women (and thus receive more of the pay as compensation for working more hours) is to support their families. This is unlikely to be true of the demographics that go clubbing. So therefore, they charge men double to balance out the equation. Nah. It's probably more like the way social media platforms have all become consorious hellsites because they wish to coddle the users who ar…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:30 AM
1

When you deny that men are the victims you create a situation in which people help the "Victims" you're pushing and leave Men out. Except protecting children from parental alienation necessarily protects the parents as well. Why not just pump money into single motherhood? Single mothers are bad for children. Quite a bit of data on the negative outcomes and effects of fatherlessness. Tada! No men helped, more men enslaved via taxes, no fathers saved. Which is a more likely outcome when you insist…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:43 AM
1

How father despite also being responsible for the conception of the child do not have a say in if it is aborted or not. Which is easily enough rebutted by pointing out that, regardless of how much he may be "responsible for the conception", he's not the one who will gestate (or abort) the fetus. You can make a point about how holding men responsible for the outcome she chooses creates a basis to assert a shared right to choose the outcome, which keeps abortion in a tenuous position since the arg…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:20 AM
1

I mean, you can do that if you want. Or you could follow my suggestion and reframe to problem in a way where people are more likely to support the solution and end the abuse and suffering.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:02 AM
1

I’m going to argue the side of male rights What do you imagine that is?
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:05 PM
34

Ugh! Guys only want one thing.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:43 AM
3

And the sources are the same for the equivalent claims in my comment.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:40 AM
3

Traditionalist/feminist gender role concepts are both based on male hyperagency. Being "more anti-feminist" doesn't mean being "more traditionalist", since they are both fundamentally unchallenging to each other. Feel free to hang around and learn how to move beyond the traditionalist/feminist mindset.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 03:29 AM
20

TIL women are selfish rapists who are bad at sex.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:38 AM
2

And all of it is committed against children.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:35 AM
2

And all of it is committed against children.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:35 AM
2

Try this: 50% of mothers see no value in protecting the child's relationship with both parents. 40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the child's visitation to punish their ex-husband.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:34 AM
1

"These types of feminists" are the ones trying to frame the issue in terms of interparental conflict, which is smart, since, as noted, most people don't care about intimate partner violence when the victim is a man.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:30 AM
1

Or by how this damages the child's relationship with both parents.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 11:21 PM
1

Several years ago an automated market analytics AI noted the correlation between a higher fraction of female employees in management and increased market performance. Due to having greater freedom of choice in terms of work/life balance, women serve as a "canary in the coal mine" for poor management, workplace environment, and worker morale. A less visible and harder to measure indicator is that top-performing employees decide they don't have to put up with that shit, either, and jump ship as we…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 11:03 PM
1

She's saying he has multiple savings accounts that he puts hundreds in each month, but oh, woe, if you don't move in for 200/month I will be evicted and have to live in my multiple cars. I get the impression that his "if you could move in and pay 200/month it would really help me out" conversation was just trying to make it feel less like he was offering her some charity.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 11:18 PM
2

Well, most people don't give a shit about abused men, so it would be kind of dumb to try to frame an issue of women abusing children in those terms.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 11:09 PM
3

Why are feminists not concerned about child abuse?
/r/MensRights26/10/19 10:50 PM
5

It's been a problem in Africa where advocacy of genital mutilation as protection against HIV infection has resulted in reduced use of barrier methods. The usual explanation for this effect is that poor health education has resulted in people who mistakenly believe that men and women who have had their genitals mutilated are no longer able to contract and/or transmit HIV infection.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 05:25 PM
3

She hasn't accepted (or perhaps even realized) that she's aging out of the target demographic of the pool of guys who pick up the check without question or who aren't concerned that she's apparently unable or unwilling to participate as an equal.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 01:03 AM
1

Scenario: a heterosexual couple tryna fuuuck Variant1: she's having trouble getting or staying physically aroused. One of them grabs a bottle of lube and they continue without significant interruption. Neither one thinks much of it. Variant2: he's having trouble getting or staying physically aroused. There is no quick and discreet way to continue. "Why is this happening to me?" they both ask themselves.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 12:21 AM
2

The paper the "only 2% of rape accusations are false" woozle originates from was not designed methodologically to determine the absolute rate of false accusations, but was instead about comparing the rates of false accusations for various crimes. The methods do not support using the rate as a stand-alone estimate of the rate of false accusations, it's comparing various crime statistics from single-sources where any flaws in their collection and analysis would exist across all data from each sour…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:49 PM
1

Imagine living in such ubiquitous safety.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:27 PM
4

Learn how to tell people "No." Kindly, respectfully, but unapologetically "No." Overcome your self-described compulsion to help.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 06:32 AM
1

One of the primary risk factors for women when it comes to being a victim of intimate partner homicide is her being a perpetrator of abuse. The Canadian provincial government services will probably never give her the mental health treatment she needs to stop being an abuser. They've trapped her in a cycle of violence that will continue to escalate. And for the people and organizations who will profit off her suffering, her eventual death is just another statistic they can use to ask for more fun…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 06:12 AM
1

And then suddenly, for no reason at all...
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:54 AM
6

Both male and female fetuses will continue to undergo differentiation changes as their genitals develop. Both male and female fetuses will appear to have two holes (i.e. genital and anal openings) on fetal ultrasound prior to the closure of the genital stoma in males. Female fetuses will continue to have two holes on ultrasound, but it's kinda facile to say that the predifferentiate fetus is "phenotypically female".
/r/MensRights23/10/19 12:55 AM
1

Gender equal reproductive rights. Specifically, minimally, ensuring equal effective access to applicable methods of Legal Parental Surrender is extended to include men, too. A robust framework of gender equal reproductive rights also addresses various other concerns, such as rape victims being forced to pay child support to rapists, it would deincentivises paternity fraud, and can generally be expected to reduce the number of unwanted children. Ban genital mutilation. Improve education and train…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 12:33 AM
1

It's a reply based on parallel construction, fairly obviously riffing on OP's title. Word choices are constrained.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 07:00 PM
1

Pointing out one occurs more frequently than another makes no comment on whether they're equally disgusting, disturbing, in need of condemnation, nor says one is worse, nor invalidates victims of smaller categories of perpetrators.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 12:49 PM
1

Usually when story comes out about a boy sexually abused by a woman, you can jaunt on down to the comments and see seemingly normal people openly sharing their child rape fantasies.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 12:36 PM
1

Blind Spots in the ‘Blind Audition’ Study A lauded 2000 article claiming to find sexism in American orchestras looks increasingly spurious. It is one of the most famous social-science papers of all time. Carried out in the 1990s, the “blind audition” study attempted to document sexist bias in orchestra hiring. Lionized by Malcolm Gladwell, extolled by Harvard thought leaders, and even cited in a dissent by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the study showed that when orchestras auditioned musicians “b…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 11:53 AM
15

It's what her future husband will want and expect.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 04:59 AM
13

Karen DeCrow (President of N.O.W. from 1974 to 1977): "The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent dec…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 04:25 AM
10

All I want is to be left alone in my average home.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 12:54 AM
1

I know. Even if you were in a session, this making-exceptions-for-self-contradiction generally does not apply to the therapist. I'm just saying she might have been applying something she'd heard in some training and didn't understand.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 08:12 PM
1

Sure, "feminism is about equality" does position anti-abortion/"pro-life" to be unironically feminist in a race-to-the-bottom way of achieving gender equality.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 08:09 PM
1

Gender equal reproductive rights would remove some of the current incentives for reproductive abuse, and thus can be expected to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. Also, since women would retain all of their current options to avoid being forced to support an unwanted child, the proposed changes only being that effective access to Legal Parental Surrender is expanded to include men, and the various options strengthened for both sexes, some cases where women might feel that abortion is th…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 08:00 PM
12

I know the UK has been criticised that a woman raping a man is not the criminal offense of "Rape", but I don't think this is what people had in mind about correcting that particular systematic and institutional inequality.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 11:42 AM
7

Gotta look out for the Best Interests of the Child the State, y'know...
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:15 AM
1

No one should be forced to use their body to support an unwanted child and we should respect that every person has a right to choose to be, or not to be, a parent. If you claim to be "pro-choice" and argue, or merely accept, that it's justifiable to force men into nonconsensual parenthood, don't be shocked when "pro-life" people take your "pro-choice" opposition to reproductive rights and apply it in a gender equal way.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:12 AM
1

My guess would be that she's had some training about some types of patients making contradictory statements from session-to-session and that it's counterproductive to draw their attention to these things and try to resolve the discrepancy rather than letting the patient feel comfortable speaking freely about whatever is important to them in the immediate session.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:12 AM
3

You look up to Trump? That explains a lot about your personality and behaviors.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 11:17 PM
1

The particular manifestation of genocidal ideology under discussion came after the Nazis.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 07:57 PM
1

Try starting here.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 07:44 PM
6

so why are more women killed by serial killers then men? Women tend to murder children, family members, and others dependent on them for care. The methods and motivations of female serial killers tend not to capture public interest even when they are detected, so they are often less well known. why are women more at risk of rape? The majority of rape victims are men. Are paid less at jobs? When you work 44% of the hours, you can expect 44% of the pay.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:56 PM
9

TELL ME WHY MEN WERENT NOT ALLOWED TO VOTE UNTIL 1900S? In many nations, failure to register for involuntary military service results in a constructive denial of suffrage and many other potential institutional harms. For instance, in the US, a man who does not register for the military draft will be ineligible for student financial aid, cannot hold a job with a company with certain types of DoD contracts, is ineligible for federal public sector employment, and in many states will be unable to ob…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:43 PM
1

The genocide, for a start, I guess.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:11 PM
1

It specifically references the plan for a Genocidal Feminist utopia outlined by founders of Gender Studies 40-50 years ago: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 03:13 PM
2

/pol/ is kinda like the Facebook experiments with making people depressed cranked up to 11.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:48 PM
6

It's interesting to put off gendering the problem as long as possible. Gotta be kinda creative when dealing with UK content, though, because a woman raping a man is not "Rape" under UK law. "London School of Economics lacks adequate support services for victims of sexual violence.", "Half of all survivors of sexual violence unable to find help under LSE's contract with Rape Crisis South London.", "Suicide rates three time higher in the inadequately helped population than the minority of victimss…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:17 AM
1

The same advisory group was responsible for both the CDC and FBI definitions. Comparing UCR statistics for "Rape" under the old and new definitions are consistent with the FBI definition also being used in a way that ignores the majority of rape victims, same as the CDC.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 12:37 AM
1

Note: The "Rape" and "MTP" statistics are collected from the exact same set of questions in the NISVS. They get shunted to different categories depending on whether the perpetrator/victim satisfy the political ideology of the CDC consultants (e.g. Koss).
/r/MensRights18/10/19 12:29 AM
8

It's interesting that the article acknowledges "gendered myths attached to sexuality", but is too bogged down in feminist rape culture ("male sex drive is inextricably linked to masculinity and power") to consider how dead bedrooms develop over time and instead makes the facile assertion that it's an intractable byproduct of libido. Here's how it usually happens: 1) Woman believes the myth that men always want sex. 2) Woman thus interprets any physical affection from a man as a sexual overture. …
/r/MensRights16/10/19 09:14 AM
2

Late 2013, early 2014. She'd sent me a link to a comment in /TheRedPill stating that Feminism was worse than Nazism. She'd sent me a lot of links to TRP after she'd learned it was a Something Awful goon op of Feminism-LARPing-as-PUA. Sometimes it was just to laugh with her at something. Sometimes it was because she wanted a detranslation. Anyway. It was often unclear which one she wanted, so I responded to clarify that they were probably talking about S.C.U.M., 1-in-9, "The Future is Female" typ…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:53 AM
1

"Innocent Until Proven Guilty" also covers victims/complainants/accusers. For those who think women shouldn't be taken seriously - how can we expect them to listen to our problems unless we listen to theirs? Was the purpose of this post just to set yourself up for this nonsense Gotcha! strawman? There are a variety of alternatives to "Believe Womrn"/"Take Women Seriously" that are not pointlessly gendered and more clearly convey the intended concept. If "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" is a bit ov…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:01 AM
39

"Now love, don't be a cunt about it. Run along and go hate men somewhere else." To crib a bit from /Halfback's comment: "This is an A/B conversation, so stop being a C or go be a bigot somewhere else." It would be fascinating for this to be a /tworedditorsonecup moment so we could read the bigot stranger's perspective .
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:47 AM
1

marry a man and sacrifice your autonomy and career goals to become financially dependent on him. Which is of course markedly different from a man's position in THE PATRIARCHY where marrying a woman merely requires him to sacrifice his autonomy and career goals to become financially supportive of her. Or marry a man and maintain your own career but be prepared to have a “second shift” career taking care of him and the home. Ah, yes, one of the rarely discussed benefits of single life is that your…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:31 AM
2

The state has decided on a formula utilizing the income of both parents. ORCs3119.07 "a parent's child support obligation for a child for whom the parent is the residential parent and legal custodian shall be presumed to be spent on that child and shall not become part of a child support order" The online calculator and worksheets ask for information about the custodial parent's income because it may be used. In most situations, it does not enter into the calculation: The noncustodial parent's i…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:51 AM
1

I'm gonna guess if women are comfortable prioritizing their convenience over not-being-murderaped, that the hysteria used to justify the official bigotry was substantially unfounded.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:43 AM
1

What's the news?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:29 AM
0

Have sex.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:24 AM
1

Most men going their own way have probably never heard of MGTOW or bother joining MGTOW discussions to talk about MGTOW or adopt a MGTOW "credo". The average hypothetical man going his own way isn't doing it to 'Smash the Matriarchy' or doing anything other than acting for his own self-preservation/interest. There's a good chance, he could read an article like this (or a "where have all the good men gone?" article) and sympathize with the authors, not giving a moment's thought that it has anythi…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:24 AM
1

There is no mention of the specific details of the disagreement or what the writer's clarification would've been. sadpanda.jpg
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:50 AM
3

Of course. Approximately 150k children are victims of paternity fraud each year. Won't someone think of the children?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:39 AM
1

You could follow the Godfrey Elfwick/Titiana McGrath model where you sardonically present "hypothetical" examples that are real/common and pepper in oblivious self-contradiction. You basically toss softballs to the followers and let the resulting discussion/debate/arguments raise awareness.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:31 AM
2

Stop using the existence of men as a threat to control your children.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:09 AM
1

The male-feminist power fantasy on display.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:00 AM
9

It probably won't hurt their own interests. Dilution and destruction of skilled labor is a great way to suppress wages. Society as a whole suffers long term, but, for a brief shining moment, they really maximized some shareholder value.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 09:31 AM
3

These kinds of "equity" programs shift the perception from "women in STEM are rare, but just as good as men" to "women in STEM who are just as good as men are rare".
/r/MensRights15/10/19 08:38 AM
1

There have been various High Court cases dealing with these sorts of issues in recent years. It's often the same handful of statutes being exploited in case after case to make false rape accusations, so once you get those to use as search terms you should have a lot to work with. I'm not sure a "media gag order" addresses the full scale of the abuse potential of false accusations in India due to the way various parts of the legal code interact.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 08:28 AM
1

Suppose 10k men and 1k women apply for these spots, not an unreasonable skew in highly competitive STEM fields.. The 100 selected men will be the top 1%. The 400 selected women will be the top 40%. The worst, absolute bottom of the barrel, male in the program can reasonably be expected to be better than 97.5% of the women. For the vast majority of women in the program, their classmates will look at them and be able to think of several people more deserving of the spot, and conclude they're only …
/r/MensRights15/10/19 08:00 AM
1

The buttons should be on the other side of the line on Dr Frankenstein's coat.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 07:25 AM
3

https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa-cause-of-death-by-age-and-gender The age-group brackets are different, but it appears to support the claims.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 06:45 AM
13

What do I do? Get a good night's rest. There's probably nothing else you can do before tomorrow morning. As for tomorrow, make sure you understand the purpose of why you're there and stay on topic. Most commonly: whatever issues there may be between you and your ex are not issues between the kids and their parents. E.g., proof of your ex being an abusive piece of shit to you shows she's a bad spouse, but not necessarily that she's a bad mother.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 06:10 AM
1

"Meninism" was created as a satirical lampoon of Feminism. It can generally be thought of as Feminism with the ol' gender switcheroo applied. "Masculism" is not something I can recall ever encountering as its own thing. It only seems to come up in contexts like this. It doesn't appear to be a commonly-used term. If I had to pick "the equivalent of feminism for men" I'd probably say traditionalism, since both share an unchallenged foundation in gender malagency (i.e., male hyperagency and female …
/r/MensRights15/10/19 05:59 AM
1

Pretty sure the old.reddit.com trick will get you into the pre-redesign modtools so you can edit the sidebar, et al. of the pre-redesign subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 05:31 AM
2

The last point should also be considered from the perspective of them being the ones manipulated into being an abuser's proxy.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 05:19 AM
1

Old pages should be deliberately and explicitly deprecated before being abandoned, as people will otherwise percieve them as current. Visitors to a subreddit cannot be reasonably expected to know the mods have chosen not to maintain consistency across the various user-experiences reddit provides.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 05:14 AM
1

Beforehand: learn to recognize abusive behaviors, to make sure people know when and why he has broken up with an abusive partner so they know not to give her access to or information about him. In the moment: try to escape the situation, defend himself as little as physically possible, record the event if feasible. De-escalation techniques may be useful. Once safe: document and preserve evidence, write a description of the events while it is still fresh in memory, tell you or another trusted adu…
/r/MensRights15/10/19 05:02 AM
1

The larger problem of older women preying on boys, though, you'll happily ignore that to post this instead.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 04:27 AM
1

Screenshot whatever it is you're seeing because the 10th sidebar rule in the bulletpoint list is "● Links to other subreddits must use NP format ("np" in place of "www")." at the link you've provided.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 04:14 AM
4

I believe that this subreddit has a serious misogyny problem. If I didn't care, I wouldn't point this out. Neat. I'll click on those links you provided to the content in question so it may be examined and discussed. Oh.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 04:05 AM
17

I suppose those rumors about Warren taking pointers from Clinton about how to win the election were true. The DNC's 2020 slogan could be "Four More Years!".
/r/MensRights15/10/19 03:56 AM
3

Apparently the only "Impact on Fathers" they're interested in are alcohol use, drug use, depression, and social isolation. Apparently having your education derailed, living in poverty conditions, and still working a job that you probably would've quit three chemical explosions ago isn't an "impact" unless you're (still) drinking about it.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 03:52 AM
1

No, the formula is a result of federal law and rules. Sure, but not by USC42s667. Please see also: Should've included 45CFRs302.56 in your tweets, then. Though do note the phrase "(and at the State's discretion, the custodial parent)" appearing throughout those guidelines. See also from your link: It's expected that ORC has the relevant language for the various things I described, I just wasn't going to bother digging around to find the language. Since the gist of your complaint is that Ohio isn…
/r/MensRights15/10/19 02:07 AM
1

That would appear to be the case, for all the detail and nuance "15in²" provides.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 12:55 AM
2

how are invasive excision or infibulation more severe? This is like arguing whether to have the shit soup or the shit sandwich for lunch.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 12:54 AM
1

The quote is from a 1982 editorial. It's mainly interesting from the perspective of advocacy for gender equal reproductive rights shifting from a institutional feminist position in 1982 to, now, something that's associated with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 11:23 PM
1

If someone made that comparison then I would address it. You're assuming you've got that much of someone's attention. You may have one fragment of a sentence to get across the scale of harm done by genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 01:41 PM
1

A 4x4" scrape on the knee removes far more flesh than MGM. That's the sort of quantitative comparison "15in²" invites.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 01:19 PM
16

You have reached an article available exclusively to subscribers Jobs platform SEEK has boosted the percentage of women in its technology graduate recruitment program from zero, five years ago, to 83 per cent by removing coding from its selection criteria. The company is preparing to take on its next batch of recruits for its 2020 program, but to improve the diversity of graduates SEEK Group HR director Kathleen McCudden said the company had to change up its testing. "We were competing with ever…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 12:24 PM
11

Reminds me of when the Australian public sector rolled out a "blind recruitment trials" in 2017 to eliminate gender bias in hiring/promotion.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 12:09 PM
1

Rs 10000 is about $140.75 USD by current exchange rates. Adjusted for PPP, it's about $2451 USD, though PPP varies wildly across India. A lakh is 100k.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 08:42 AM
1

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on. AHMEDABAD: Even if one becomes a sanyasi and renounces the world, he cannot absolve himself from the responsibility of maintaining parents. A family court has ordered a sanyasi to pay Rs 10,000 monthly maintenance to his parents. While directing the sanyasi-son to maintain his parents, the court observed, "As a son, it is his responsiblity to maintain parents and he cannot escape from the responsibility." The case involves Dharmesh Gol (27), who holds a master'…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 08:31 AM
1

I saw these on the shelf a couple weeks back. They had already been slapped with a "Clearance" sticker and were marked down by 50%. I was tempted to buy one as a collectible.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 08:17 AM
4

Karen DeCrow (President of N.O.W. from 1974 to 1977): "The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent dec…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 08:10 AM
2

USC42s667 boils down to meaning the State can only count child support awarded via court order. It does not create a duty for those awards to be consistent, equitable, based in reality, or subject to explicit rules or calculations. Ohio may have State code that stipulates those things, but many do not. The calculator may have no basis in law. In almost all cases the judge may deviate from the calculated amounts at their own discretion. They may or may not be required to explain or justify deviat…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:35 AM
3

Never heard of any of them. Based on the other comments it appears they're PUA cargo cultists. There are other subreddits specifivslly for that kinda sketchy bullshit and trying to spin it as "men's self help channels" doesn't make it less sketchy or magically "Anti-MRM".
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:23 AM
1

"Happy wife happy life" is normalization of abuse.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:13 AM
1

I had an ex decide to accuse me of rape in order to change the topic away from the discussion of how out-of-control her drinking had become. I assume the abrupt silence clued her in that she'd gone too far, because she started in with a very similar sort of fumbling damage control about how she wasn't going to tell anyone else and didn't want anything to happen. Then I broke up with her. And we never discussed her alcoholism again.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:11 AM
1

She bought a property with a house she wanted on a loan in her name only using all of the 250K. This was done with my permission because I want my daughter to have the same lifestyle she has enjoyed form a dual income family. This was after the blow out leading to the divorce. Solely in her name or not, that house is still "marital property" and you're entitled to half of it. You're also liable for half of it, but how that gets worked out can be interesting since your name is not on the debt wit…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:00 AM
1

Sure. It has the false appearance of being relevant when you frame your beef with genital mutilation as "15in²".
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:03 AM
1

What's the wording of the statute?
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:01 AM
1

I agree that law enforcement, etc. would probably try to pull some shit if a man exercised his reproductive rights in a way exactly identical to the ways women are able to exercise their reproductive rights. However, absent a court order specifying otherwise, each parent has 100% custody, so it is not kidnapping to abscond with your own child. And, generally speaking, absconding with your own child in violation of a court order is likely to be defined as something other than kidnapping as well. …
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:57 AM
2

A lot of wage gap articles have made explicitly false claims about what controls are in place and what's actually being compared. It's possible to get total hours worked and total paid compensation by gender from StatsCan and then compute "raw" gender gaps directly. The gender work gap in Canads is about 74.1% (i.e., women work 42.6% of all hours). The gender pay gap in Canada is about 75.5% (i.e., women are paid 43.0% of all dollars). This gets you women being paid 1.01$/hr for every 1$/hr men …
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:12 AM
1

And a 4x4" scrape on the knee is bigger.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 09:29 AM
2

I know what "a lot of people" will think, but that's simply factually inaccurate. And describing it as "15 square inches" does little to correct that inaccuracy.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 09:23 AM
9

Your Tax Dollars At Work
/r/MensRights13/10/19 08:32 AM
3

Which ones are more severe? Particularly invasive excision and infibulation. I don't think it's even possible to remove 15 square inches of flesh from a vulva without something like a cheesegrater. It would make more sense to think in terms of the relative fraction of erogenous sensory tissue removed and consequent damage to function of the genital remnants than getting caught up on "15 square inches". A lot of people will think your "15 square inches" is no more significant than getting a 4x4" …
/r/MensRights13/10/19 08:23 AM
5

That can be substantially attributed to Supply&Demand. As the number of workers competing for a job increases (i.e., because both men and women are applying) there is an oversupply of labor and so the price of that labor (i.e., the wages employers have to pay to get someone in the job) goes down. There's also the effect of men historically being the primary source of household income, and so they required, and demanded, wages and weekly hours that would allow them to support a family. Women's in…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 08:02 AM
1

Primary Source being reported on in the article.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 07:45 AM
4

AutoMod archive of the self.text. TL;DR: Guy knocks up acquaintance/ONS. She's initially "don't worry, I'll abort it". He says he's 'pro-life' and basically gets her to agree to a surrogate and wet-nurse contract (that for some reason includes a provision for visitation). Kid's born, they're sticking to the agreement. Her using her visitation annoys him. She negotiates a new contract for more visitation where she pays him an hourly rate. He basically denies her any visitation past the point wher…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 07:31 AM
1

People in this sort of situation need to familiarize themselves with "Safe Haven" abandonment laws for their area.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 06:51 AM
5

StatsCan keeps official track of these things. The numbers for hours worked specifically in Saskatchewan in 2018 were 40.3:32.5::men:women. So, using the $32.92:$27.04 from the article, you get women being paid $1.03 for every $1/hr paid to men. Slight higher inequality than Canada as a whole.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 06:33 AM
6

Forms of FGM more severe than MGM are less than 5% of the female population even in areas where FGM is commonly practiced and less than 1% of FGM overall. FGM is rarely more severe than MGM. Neither should be legal.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 06:05 AM
8

often You misspelled "rarely".
/r/MensRights13/10/19 04:19 AM
1

Only really come up in one relationship. I didn't particularly mind that she self-identified as a feminist, since we'd had enough conversations for me to know she wasn't going to suddenly start advocating genocide, but she definitely had a problem defaulting to an "opposing teams" mindset and needed regular reassurance that we still liked each other. It caused her a lot of cognitive dissonance to get worked up about how I must be a misogynist ringleader of the He-Man Woman Haters Club... and the…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 11:52 PM
1

I will fight as hard as I can to remove reproductive rights of women. Appearing (without context) soon in a "manosphere" article near you!
/r/MensRights12/10/19 12:21 AM
5

She'd probably still be alive if she'd ever gotten proper treatment for being an abuser. Unfortunately, ideology in the services dealing with domestic violence means women are denied the help they need.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:51 PM
5

Don't let your soon-to-be-ex-wife's child abuse deter you. As she spells out, there is nothing you can do to protect them. Protect yourself.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:27 AM
1

Needs more jpeg.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 10:31 PM
5

Pictures of text.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 08:34 PM
1

And sure, whatever, take a look at the dating app stats, you see how this affects boys and girls differently, but they're two sides of the same coin. When growing up with your only role model for empathy, emotional self-regulation, and good decisionmaking being a single mother, you don't have the best chance of overcoming that.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 07:52 PM
1

A common thread that crops up again and again in the childhood history of "incels" is single motherhood. And let's not pretend this is a problem with a specific gender. There is a similarly large population of dissatisfied women in the same cohort. Presumption of equal custody in divorce and gender equal reproductive rights would be long term solutions to protect future generations of children. It may be too late for the current crop of kids and young adults, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 04:49 PM
9

Using the word "privilege" is counterproductive in other ways. E.g., "Being treated fairly by the cops is white privilege!" So... what is it that you're advocating? That police abuse of power should apply to everyone?
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:39 PM
1

Future generations learning the Quran in Mandarin seems more probable.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 09:23 AM
3

If we choose any sort of quality-of-life rationale (e.g., "brain activity") as our standard, it's fairly straightforward to point out that animals that equal or surpass toddlers by these metrics are routinely killed for reasons far less fraught than those raised by abortion. Ergo, by any quality-of-life standard, it's acceptable to kill a fetus at any point, up to and including the moment of birth.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 09:06 AM
1

Abortion should be legal until there’s brain activity. We unplug braindead patients without calling it murder, because there’s no person left there "Braindead" patients often DO still have brain activity, it's just not the sort of regular patterns of neuroelectrical firing associated with the brain of a person (e.g. "alpha waves"). In humans, these patterns are established around three years. So, using this standard, one can quite reasonably advocate for abortion to remain legal, on demand, for …
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:52 AM
7

In the wise words of Karen DeCrow (President of N.O.W. from 1974 to 1977), "The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women m…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:35 AM
1

When the menstrual leave ends, she must bring with her two turtledoves or two young pigeons and present them to the supervisor at the entrance to the worksite. The supriestvisor will offer one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. Through this process, the priest will purify her before the LORD for the ceremonial impurity caused by her bleeding.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:11 AM
4

Ma'amsplaining.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:55 AM
2

i think you have an antiquated idea of feminism. it's not the era of bra burning and man hating anymore. So back in the 1970s, lesbian separatists came up with a slogan to refer to a genocidal feminist utopia where men have been reduced to less than 10% of the population. This group would later go on to found the field of Woman & Gender Studies. You may remember the slogan from the 2016 presidential campaign. I should add that the genocide of at least 45% of the human population was final step o…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:52 AM
1

Geeks, Mops, & Sociopaths
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:26 AM
3

Any circumstances where you'd have your dick out and there isn't anyone else around to make sure el kiddo doesn't light his hair on fire while painting the cat with peanut butter. Gotta pee? He's coming with you. Gotta poop? Bring a Dr. Seuss book to read to him. It's 10am and you're already splattered with various substances, at least three of which are small human bodily fluids? That adorable fucker is gonna get his hellspawn ass washed in the shower, too. Not to mention potty training kind of…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:07 AM
17

Make sure other people involved with the child know not to try to forcefully retract a child's foreskin while it's still fused to the glans. Anyone who might change a diaper or otherwise have access. Grandparents, babysitters, daycare, even pediatricians. "He had a little dirt under his fingernails, so I ripped them off." is a pretty visceral analogy if someone is having trouble understanding. And provided you don't raise him to think touching his penis is bad and he needs to keep his hands off …
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:53 AM
1

I understand the story they want to tell, but for all I know every Thursday night preview audience is 70% male, mostly 18-34, and total ticket sales are around $10M. Are any of these contextless facts significant? In what way are they unusual? Is this more gender skew than normal, or less? More money than normal, or less? It appears that 18-34 outnumbers the <18 or >34 age groups in the general population, so it seems like these are just expected, unremarkable statistics.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:39 AM
1

I was having a rape is sincerely hilarious moment.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:43 AM
1

Setting aside the brain damage caused by the excruciatingly traumatic levels of pain inflicted when cutting off parts of a newborn's genitals without any kind of anesthetic, you may try the somewhat less horrifyingly depressing analogy of a child who was born deaf due to a cochlear defect. Without the normal flow of sensory data, the parts of the infant's brain that would be devoted to processing sound end up being repurposed to doing other things. If you give the child artificial cochlear impla…
/r/MensRights07/10/19 09:14 AM
1

Keep in mind that "emotional labor", as a general concept, refers to the effort involved in maintaining a discrepancy between your internal and external emotional states. The original example was customer-facing employees being expected to appear to be cheerful. In the Clinical PTSD context, it refers to both an initiating event where one must remain unaffected while traumatic shit is happening around you and a manifesting event where one must remain unaffected while traumatic shit is happening …
/r/MensRights07/10/19 08:31 AM
1

#boyswillbeboys
/r/MensRights07/10/19 08:05 AM
4

A lot of sources talk about custody and child support seemingly interchangeably, but they are, at best, loosely coupled by law. Their overlap is a result of the most common scenarios that involve one also involving the other. Keeping her kids at arms length will help ensure you have no parental rights and cannot claim custody. That whole area of discussion has little bearing on your question of being required to continue to provide child support in the event of divorce.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 02:32 AM
5

You will be (and likely have been) providing support to her children. The courts may (and likely will) opine that it's in the children's best interests for that support to continue. Pointing out the undisputed fact they are not your children has been tried and failed in court many times before.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 01:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter