TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

metadinex Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by metadinex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-15

She was banned for fabricating quotes and attributing them to people. Not for saying Christmas is not oppressive to women.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 02:45 AM
-1

Yeah you failed. Try again somewhere else.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:05 PM
1

Yes we agree that there really isn't any evidence that Zoe Quinn had sex in exchange for good reviews or even for favorable media coverage. As far as gaming "journalism" being bad and corrupt, that's nothing new. I thought everyone knew this ever since Jeff Gerstmann was fired from Gamespot for giving a bad review to Kane and Lynch 2, which was the main sponsor of the Gamespot website at the time.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:30 PM
3

They weren't reviews or anything resembling reviews. And the publication dates are from before he was supposed to have a sexual relationship with her. http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/01/08/admission-quest-valve-greenlights-50-more-games/ So yeah everything I've said is correct.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 09:19 AM
1

Well I told you that they didn't write any reviews. How am I going to show you the reviews they didn't write? You're the one asserting something that isn't true and didn't happen. Here's a quote from one of the many articles about this if that's good enough for you: "Many detractors took this to be a proof positive that she’d slept with him in order to get positive press for Depression Quest, but there’s no evidence to suggest that any such journalistic conspiracy took place. Grayson never wrote…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 09:07 AM
-2

You tell me. It's hilarious to me that I'm saying something that is completely factually correct and people on r/mensrights downvote me, while they upvote you for saying things that aren't true.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:24 PM
-2

Not a single person she is accused of sleeping with wrote a review or anything resembling a review of her game. So no, you're dead wrong.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:27 PM
4

The funds go to Paul Elam and he spends them at his discretion.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:16 PM
0

Because the male bankers have been punished so much harder. This isn't an example of sexism.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 01:53 PM
0

haha so you don't have to be female to be the victim of misogyny. Gotcha
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:03 PM
0

"So you didn't fall back on calling me a misogynist as well when I refuted your claims? You didn't invoke a victim narrative portraying me a person who hates women and yourself as the implicit object of that hate?"
/r/MensRights22/09/14 10:53 PM
0

haha now you're pretending like you didn't just make the false assumption that I'm female. So bitter because I corrected you on that.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 10:23 PM
4

This youtube channel is hilarious. I particularly like this video that says suffering proves God is real https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNtz5wgnopQ&list=UUZWlSUNDvCCS1hBiXV0zKcA
/r/MensRights22/09/14 10:14 PM
0

I would love to see you quote me saying anything resembling "man bad, woman victim". You can't because now you're arguing against the voices in your head and not anything I said. And I'm not female. You keep making assumptions that are dead wrong.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:55 PM
0

And claiming I "played the victim" doesn't even make any sense. I have done no such thing. I have presented a clear pattern of misogyny and that's all I have done. I haven't acted like a victim in anything and I haven't called anyone random buzzwords. You're pretty damn bad at making arguments.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:25 PM
0

I have presented a pretty clear pattern of misogyny from Paul Elam. It's not my fault that you don't like it.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:24 PM
0

So you can't defend what was said.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:45 PM
-3

No, I'm just pointing out that it's not really that high status of a thing to be a NFL cheerleader. And since they're basically not paid it's not really much of a punishment to "fire" them. This is low level stuff that obviously didn't get much attention for that reason.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:40 AM
-3

NFL cheerleaders barely make any money. In fact some of them aren't paid at all. It's not really a "job".
/r/MensRights21/09/14 08:34 PM
0

I already showed you the quotes where he makes it clear he's talking specifically about men being accused of raping women. He says this explicitly in the article. Either you're playing dumb now, or you are dumb.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:56 PM
1

What if there is overwhelming evidence? Multiple witnesses and video for example. Would you defend acquitting the person because something something unfair justice system?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:44 PM
0

He's saying no matter how overwhelming the evidence is, he would still acquit. So if there's video evidence and a 100 witnesses he would acquit any man accused of rape. This is pretty obviously misogynistic. He has zero empathy for women that are victims of rape.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:39 PM
0

If you read the article you will see that it's Paul Elam that is specifically talking about men being accused of rape in that context. Some quotes: "We have seen it over and over again. Women lie about being raped, judicial politicians make careers off of putting away sexual offenders, and a brainwashed public cheers it all on. " "Better a rapist would walk the streets than a system that merely mocks justice enslave another innocent man." So it's Elam that is guilty of the assumptions you're acc…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:10 PM
0

Yes http://web.archive.org/web/20120318072131/http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/jury-duty-at-a-rape-trial-acquit/ The context doesn't make it any better.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 03:39 PM
-1

He's saying no matter how overwhelming the evidence is he would vote to acquit. So if there's 100 witnesses and video evidence he would still vote to acquit. I would love to see you defend the statement "Regardless of the evidence I would vote guilty in a rape case". You wouldn't defend that and you know it. So you're just another hypocritical misogynist.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:12 PM
-1

He's saying no matter how overwhelming the evidence is he would vote to acquit. So if there are 100 witnesses and video evidence he would still vote to acquit. This is extremely misogynistic. The fact that you defend this says to me you're extremely misogynistic too. You would never defend "I will vote guilty regardless of evidence in a rape case", even though it's the exact same statement.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:58 PM
0

He's saying no matter how overwhelming the evidence is he would vote to acquit. So if there are 100 witnesses and video evidence he would still vote to acquit. This is extremely misogynistic. The fact that you defend this says to me you're extremely misogynistic too.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:47 PM
-7

I did read it http://web.archive.org/web/20120318072131/http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/jury-duty-at-a-rape-trial-acquit/ It's extremely misogynistic. If a feminist had said anything similar then no one here would give that person the same pass they give a misogynist like Paul Elam. Imagine if a feminist said "I will vote guilty in every rape case regardless of the evidence". I'm willing to bet a lot of money that it would be hard to find anyone on this subreddit to de…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:29 AM
-2

This is what I imagine you look like http://www.inthemomlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/cry-baby.jpg Please don't respond to me if it's only to cry.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:18 AM
-4

So you concede that Paul Elam is a misogynist. Good for you.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:08 AM
-5

If that quote doesn't come off as misogynistic to you then I don't know what to tell you. It's his pattern of statements like that and violence fantasies against women that makes it obvious he hates women.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:57 AM
-8

"Should I be called to sit on a jury for a rape trial, I vow publicly to vote not guilty, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that the charges are true. " -Paul Elam These are the words of a guy that clearly hates women.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:47 AM
-17

You're not great at logic. Fantasizing about beating up this woman is an obvious tell that Elam hates women in general. This is a horrible story and his first thought went towards the fantasy of beating her up. For people that are more rational and less misogynistic their brains don't immediately go to that fantasy. This all fits into a bigger pattern with Elam, where he among other things has claimed he would vote to acquit in the event he were called to serve on the jury in a rape trial even i…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:47 AM
-17

"It is simply one of the most disgusting things I have ever seen. Quote mine me all you want, had the father of this child beaten this piece of shit woman to within an inch of her life I would not have offered one scintilla of objection or condemnation." It's these kind of violence fantasies against women that make it obvious Paul Elam deeply hates women. There was no need in this story to fantasize about beating up the woman.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 11:04 PM
-4

Why would there be a public outrage over something some irrelevant reality tv "celebrity" did?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:44 PM
0

No they don't. He never claims any violence or anything that would be classified as abuse. He claims his wife wants sex all the time and he doesn't want it. This is not abuse. And it's certainly not rape like so many mens rights clowns are calling it.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:18 AM
0

No he never claimed to be a victim of actual abuse. He said that his wife wanted sex all the time and he didn't want it. Asking your spouse for sex is not abuse.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:53 AM
1

Why are you saying victim? There really was no victims in this case. The man never claimed to be a victim of rape or physical abuse, so why are you implying he was?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 08:36 PM
0

It's clear he's talking about the comments to the video they put out. He's accurately describing what those comments say as you can see if you just read the comments yourself. It's not much effort you have to go through to check if it's true or not. It's pretty absurd you're making a big deal out of this.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 08:23 PM
1

Just read the comments to the older video and even to the followup video linked here. Plenty of people claiming the woman raped the man, even though he never claimed this to be the case himself. Asking for proof when the proof is right in front of your face is pretty lazy.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 03:34 PM
2

How is this not what he said? He said that it made a lot of sense to get the divorce if they have completely different sex drives.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 02:43 PM
1

The mens rights people did indeed go overboard. The man in the story never claimed he was raped, but a ton of mens rights activists claimed he was being raped. All he claimed was that she wanted a lot of sex and he didn't want it. If this is rape then there are a lot of married rapists walking around out there.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:32 AM
-4

Basically Stefan makes up a lot of shit about Robin Williams inner thoughts when in reality he doesn't know any of what went through his mind.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:56 PM
1

100% sure
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:05 PM
1

I guess I was right. You can't.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:23 PM
1

omg I won't listen to the bully so I'm a retard. I'm looking forward to you producing quotes showing Futrelle doesn't think men can be raped. Oh right, you can't, because he never said that.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:12 PM
1

Yeah you don't need people pointing out that you're defending pedophilia supporters. Because it would be a real shame if pedophilia was called out instead of the evil womyns.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:01 PM
1

You're the idiot that started responding to me with completely irrelevant things. So please don't do that again.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:47 AM
1

I pointed out what this "theantifeminist" guy had said and was downvoted. So that's an indirect defense of him yes. I actually care about equality rights. That's why I'm distancing myself from the "mens rights" movement where people like "theantifeminist" aren't called out for what they are. Deeply misogynistic pedophilia apologists. Also Elliot Rodgers did sound like an "MRA", and Futrelle does not believe that men can't be raped.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:02 AM
1

The fact that the frequent users of this subreddit defends "theantifeminist", a guy that has said 10 year old prostitutes should be punished for preying on people, is really all I need to know about this "movement" you have going here.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 11:51 PM
1

How is this a response to anything I said. Spam your nonsense to someone else please.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 11:30 PM
1

wow you keep lowering the bar. Do any of you have anything substantive to say?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:30 AM
1

That doesn't make any sense. I expected very little when I decided to drop some facts on r/mensrights and you guys delivered even less.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:10 PM
-1

You should read the tweets this guy wrote. You would make yourself look less stupid that way. He's a blatant pedophilia apologist and it's impossible to deny that fact if you try reading what he actually wrote.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:29 PM
-5

This guy that is unsuccessfully trying to smear Futrelle is an actual pedophile apologist himself http://wehuntedthemammoth.com/2014/08/05/lies-damn-lies-and-janet-bloomfield-the-worlds-least-convincing-liar-is-now-trying-to-smear-me/ Edit: These are some of the things said by the "mens rights" guy you people use as a source: "When you were 10, did you know how to consent? I did, some don't, but child whores are precocious hustlers, so do." "A 10 year old whore targeting the pedo tourist strip i…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:57 PM
2

The title “How to Be a Lesbian in 10 Days or Less” is satirical. It's not meant to be taken seriously and she doesn't actually teach you how to become a lesbian.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:53 AM
3

You have no idea how Affirmative Action works. Asians don't get "extra points" from it. In fact it's likely that more Asians will get into the school of their choice if Affirmative Action is abolished. Not less.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 02:34 PM
1

You call it requirements but I doubt it was. It's just tests that you go through. Those "requirements" are only requirements if you want to join the professional part of the military.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:24 AM
3

No, what you're missing is that nowadays no one that don't want to go will have to because they accept so few because of budgetary constraints. It was different not many years back when I had to go. So this will make the system gender neutral in practice, not just in theory.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:12 AM
2

I answered the question. There are no physical requirements to be drafted.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:02 AM
1

It may have worked like that where you were at, but what you're describing certainly isn't universal for the army. Plenty of people failed the tests where I was, and it had no consequences on the subsequent service time.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:51 AM
2

I really don't get what the fuck I was supposed to get out of this reply.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 07:41 PM
1

I don't get the point of this reply. You're just repeating back to me what I said.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 07:31 PM
5

There are no physical tests to be drafted outside of not having some kind of chronic illness etc. You do these tests after you've been drafted and it doesn't really matter if you pass or not. You're not going to get kicked out for failing. Plenty of people failed the tests when I was in and it didn't matter at all. That includes people that really didn't want to be there. For people that want to join the professional part of the military they have to pass these tests to get in.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 07:21 PM
7

Norway is involved in wars through NATO operations, but that's the professional part of the military, not the conscription part.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 07:10 PM
3

Requirements for what? I don't think you thought this through at all. There are no bench or pushup requirements for the conscription service. And people aren't sent to any front lines in this service. Girls in Norway have already gone through the mandatory military service for years voluntarily and they do the same stuff as the guys do.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:59 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about? The service will be the same, and there are no dangerous jobs in conscription in Norway.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:46 PM
2

Seriously? The people here have problems with a campaign about looking out for your friends?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 03:09 PM
-1

I'm amused at the idea of caring about whether or not you're downvoted on r/mensrights, or reddit in general really. Try thinking for yourself. I guess I lied. This was my last response.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:32 PM
-3

Well you keep going and asking questions even though I said I didn't want to go any deeper into it other than the simple point i made. So I'm sure you wouldn't ask even more follow up questions if I did go into it. I'm allowed to make simple points without engaging in a long debate about it if I want to. Now unless you have something else, this is my last response to you.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:25 PM
-3

Making one point doesn't mean I'm interested in a long and drawn out debate. This shouldn't be too hard to understand.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:56 AM
-3

You're supposed to think exactly what I'm saying. That I don't care enough about trying to convince you to put any effort into it. I haven't been unclear about this.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 10:40 AM
-5

Yeah, I'm not going to do that. I don't care enough about what you believe to do that work. It really is easy to find and if you can't google it yourself I don't know what to think of your intelligence.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 08:23 AM
-16

I can, but I don't see the value in listing examples that i find from a google search. You can google it yourself if you want.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:32 PM
-14

That's certainly part of it. I see the same kind of talk and arguments in other cases without "athletes" so I don't buy that hero worship is the only thing to blame.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:34 PM
-15

I have never suggested that as a solution. I'm simply pointing out that the Steubenville case was a great example of rape culture. You can find many cases like it yourself with Google if you're interested in collecting data.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:15 PM
-21

Except it's not an anomaly. It's very much systemic.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:09 PM
3

I think we got a pretty good example of rape culture recently with the Steubenville case and the way it was covered.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter