TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

methcamp Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by methcamp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

obviously just brainwashed by this fascist CIS patriarchal dictatorship.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 10:41 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/ebF7T.gif
/r/MensRights01/12/13 10:38 PM
3

I dont think you people understand who the media is...
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:48 PM
0

I think that if they want anti-male groups, they should be allowed to do so. You're worse than they are.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 07:56 PM
14

The comic didnt say the government is paying for birth control, many feminists do believe the government should pay for it.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:19 PM
5

Yes, let's ignore the truth.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:52 AM
1

"affirmative action"
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:13 AM
1

I know that, its painfully obvious. Thats no reason to overreact to a video when you dont even know what the reason for this assault might be.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 10:12 PM
2

No back story? All humans are capable of doing awful things, men, women and the elderly. You guys are acting like feminazis, overreacting and bravely talking about how tough you would be if you saw this going down and you have no idea why its going down, and automatically making one person the enemy and one the victim because you think that the world need to know that women can be violent.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:55 PM
1

Groups bound by racial/cultural roots wont be protected if they are of European ancestry, thats for sure.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:42 PM
-4

SO BRAVE
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:23 PM
0

I dont mean it makes their argument more legit, it just gives them another point they think they can make.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:49 PM
0

That take just bolsters their argument that men are the evil force behind rape.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:15 PM
1

Those studies only regurgitate the same numbers and stats, numbers and stats dont show REASON.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:34 AM
1

Thats nice, it doesnt prove that race was the REASON for those longer sentences. Is it really that hard to understand?
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:19 AM
1

Ive read it all before. Its easy to dismiss, it all says the same thing. The judge knows just as much about the defendants background. 5 blacks getting x sentence and 5 whites getting y sentence doesnt prove anything. There are tons of factors that play into those situations that everyone likes to ignore.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:01 AM
1

How is race PROVEN to be a factor? It CAN NOT be proven.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 11:34 PM
1

I guess then race cant be either...
/r/MensRights05/10/13 11:34 PM
1

It did not prove race as a factor, it showed numbers. That doesnt prove anything. It only proves that certain people WERE arrested/charged/sentenced etc... saying it was BASED on race is purely an ASSUMPTION. If i show you the statistics that show that blacks are about 10 times more likely to commit an aggravated assault or murder, would you agree that african americans are more likely to commit murder because of their race or because more of them live in poverty?
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:50 PM
1

So you're telling me that the ethical thing to do would be ignore high crime areas because it might be considered racist? You are putting the cart before the horse. This is also a discussion about an analogy used on something that was simple and easy to explain without an analogy based on assumptions from someone with an obvious agenda, it really doesnt belong here.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:39 PM
1

you are completely ignoring several factors as to why blacks are stopped and frisked at a higher rate. A well known fact is that people living in low income urban areas are stopped and frisked more often. This is something that should be considered before something like race.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:24 PM
1

that class being of socioeconomic, not race based.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:34 PM
1

correlation < causation
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:33 PM
0

Its a bad analogy because it focuses on race as if its proven to be a factor in sentencing...
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:18 AM
-4

terrible analogy
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:43 PM
0

Were those statements referring to abortion in general or the part of the bill that banned abortion past 20 weeks? There are few good reasons to wait 5 months to have an abortion, and pro-lifers definitely freak out over aborting a fully developed fetus.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:20 PM
0

The actual bill that was presented was about "expanding" background checks, not requiring them. But regardless of the end result... it is very wrong for politicians to intentionally regulate places out of business just because they don't like those businesses. I hope you agree with that statement at least, even if you somehow disagree over whether that is what happened in Texas. Of course i agree, but that case could be made for any strict regulation. I still haven't seen proof that any politici…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:56 PM
0

Diane Feinstein was working on a bill that would BAN all "military style" firearms. You really need to look this up if you dont understand it. What the activists were saying is "this bill WILL shut down clinics", not "this bill will shut down clinics if they dont follow new standards ", do you understand how that changes what a person hears? One person says it, thousands hear it and before you know it tens of thousands dont know what the fuck theyre talking about but they'll still tell you you'r…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:32 PM
0

You do know that a business can move to a new building without having to tear down the current building right? Do you understand what happens when the state adds new standards to a business? They dont walk in the next day and shit you down, you have time to make changes, there are inspections after, then there is time given to correct if things still arent right. But what do i know, im just a small business owner... Do you know why they added into the bill that doctors must have admitting privil…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:12 PM
0

The standards are not impossibly high, they didnt invent new standards out of thin air. These are standards that other types of clinics and small hospitals adhere to. 37 of 42 abortion clinics have to close IF they do not adhere to the new standards. Please show me where republicans admitted to using this to close clinics. The gun analogy is bad, there are millions of people who own guns in texas. less than 70k women had abortions last year. Guns actually serve a purpose. The majority of abortio…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:34 PM
1

The rules were to basically raise standards for abortion clinics. Maybe the standards were set too high but it was nothing the clinics couldnt deal with. They were claiming that the bill would have shut clinics down but that would only happen if they refused the new standards. State governments have strict standards for all types of businesses, when these standards are added, these businesses adapt and carry on. I havent seen any of those politicians that said that the bill was intended to shut …
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:42 PM
1

Im not against abortion, but this recent bill here was not closing any clinics or making abortion illegal.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:12 PM
5

As a Texan, im really tired of hearing about abortion from feminists. Less than 1% of women in Texas got an abortion last year, but when abortion is brought up at all in the government feminists act like it should be priority #1 for everyone. Then they act like Hitler has been reincarnated and has become governor of Texas.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:47 PM
8

Never fails to amaze me : If 20,000 men are shot to death in the street , it's only newsworthy if a stray bullet scratches rapes oppresses a woman's leg.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 08:24 PM
2

Consensual sex that causes pregnancy is also violence against women. right???
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:21 PM
1

public defenders are a joke.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 01:01 AM
1

sadly, this only happened because he was a popular athlete
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:57 AM
9

The entire criminal justice system is completely fucked up. Every singe person, regardless of race or social status (for the most part) is at risk of being screwed by it.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:10 PM
2

Yes, lets blame racism for poor judgement.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:22 AM
1

It seems to me that every type of "rights movement" is just as much about punishing their oppressors (even those who were never in a position to oppress) as it is about gaining rights. And those rights always seem to include special privileges.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:37 PM
2

get a lawyer that specializes in helping men in custody cases
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:07 AM
4

If he fails it hes guilty, if he passes it polygraphs are unreliable.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:01 AM
1

seems legit...
/r/MensRights25/05/13 12:32 PM
2

in the south its actually called "Fightin' Words"
/r/MensRights25/05/13 12:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter