TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mezzozy Archive

View 1 post and 75 comments by mezzozy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

mezzozy/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 03:53 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Okay, but I'm not attacking the product....?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/14 04:58 PM
1

Someone, being a good amount of women. While I don't think many people will know about this nail polish, a lot of cases are blamed where women "make themselves a target" by how they dress, or that it is their assumed responsibility to carry a can of mace on them at all times, rather than it being everyone's responsibility not to rape. Again, I'm not against this, and I see nothing but good intent from the people making it, I'm just pointing out that there are going to be some dickwads that will …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/14 02:00 PM
1

Certainly. While again, it's a great self-defense tool, women are blamed for not carrying it if they are attacked. And having it doesn't ensure their safety or worse yet, it is used against them. Learning self-defense is great and I'd encourage everyone to, but if someone is attacked, the blame should belong on the attacker, not the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/14 12:54 PM
2

I'm a mixed bag on this. On one hand, I can see this being a great product to help women protect themselves. And that's great! On the other hand...I can see the existence of this product being used to victim blame women, as they are with other things such as "Why didn't you try to fight him off?", "What were you wearing?", etc. I'd compare it to locking your car. It's probably a good idea; but locking it won't prevent thieves. A thief won't go up to a locked car and think "Ah, geez I guess I can…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/14 01:09 AM
1

I think I might have mixed you up with someone else. That's what I get for not clicking "context". ;(
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 07:27 PM
2

I mean I guess I like to give people the benefit of doubt when they spew off hatred. Oh that guy is racist because he had some really bad experiences with black people. Or that lady doesn't like gay people because she was raised in a heavily religious household and that is what she was taught. Are you saying you have absolutely no reason to hate teen parents but simply choose to?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 05:25 PM
4

Congrats, you dated a bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 03:29 PM
1

Even the lesbians, I guess!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 04:22 AM
1

Just something I've never quite understood...so the woman here is a "plate", so I'm assuming this means try have agreed on being fuck buddies and nothing more? Therefore, why is it a "shit test" when a woman gives attention to another guy when she's only a plate to this dear alpha? Neither of them are committed, so I don't see what the big deal is. More importantly, why is it seen as heroic to respond to the test by him getting with another lady? Yeah the whole "but I looooove you!" Thing is kin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 04:40 PM
2

Personally I think it's a bit unfair, but women are often turned down from having their tubes tied as well. We live in a society that expects everyone to desire to have kids, so these procedures are denied with "You'll change your mind when you're older!" Abortions on the other hand, terminate an existing pregnancy. It doesn't mean the woman can't become pregnant again, even though that seems to be a popular myth they have to tell them to scare them out of it...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 04:24 PM
1

I feel that therapy isn't a magical place where all your relationship woes are fixed. It doesn't work like a doctor where you just take some pills and you're better; rather the effectiveness of the therapy is dependent on how much each partner puts in, and if the therapist is a good match. Think of it like troubleshooting. It might not fix the problem, but it's worth going through the common solutions to said problem before just giving up the second attraction is lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/14 08:49 PM
1

Mostly just not treat people differently for being short. There's a big difference in saying, "That person is short." And being mean and say patting them on the head and calling them short stuff or directing jokes towards Asians cause LOLOLOL azns r short lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 04:13 PM
1

I don't think going against the grain and not adhering to stereotypes, even if a majority follow suit, is going to get rid of those stereotypes. It's important to realize that many stereotypes hold a double-standard; what's acceptable in one group is deplorable in another. A small example, but take dyed hair in women. If a white woman was to dye her hair purple, positive attributes such as, "unique", or "independent" might be used to describe her. If a black woman was to dye her hair purple, she…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 03:37 PM
1

I guess in your world, sure. I tend to like to look at people a individuals, not bound to stereotypes about their particular race/nationality/sex/whatever. Again, if you believe they are based in truth, then does that mean I can judge you on your particular groups' stereotypes and treat you less for it? I mean if you argue no you're just censoring truths!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 01:48 PM
4

For similar reasons people populate /r/thathappened, /r/tumblrinaction, etc. Sometimes it's just entertaining to see how far the rabbit hole goes. And while yeah it bothers me how extreme they can get with their shitty posts (like the recent one claiming women all want to be raped by a "high value man"), sometimes I just need some entertainment with some dudebro's "field report", claiming he cracked the supa secret code to wimmenz.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 03:11 AM
2

Alright that's fine and dandy and all but how about we work on dismantling negative stereotypes instead of reinforcing them with "that's just the way it is"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 09:11 PM
1

Like I said, no. Because there is always going to be people that don't fit that bill. You could say I'm probably "superior" in every important sense than someone who suffers from mental disabilities. Do I therefore act like my shit doesn't stink and treat them like shit? Of course not, because their value as a person can't solely be judged on intelligence. So in your hypothetical world, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 06:38 PM
1

No. Because how do we define "better", first off? How do we measure if someone is "better"? What traits would be valued and what traits would be seen as undesirable or useless? Remember there is always someone "better" and "worse" than you at something, gender does not matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 06:21 PM
2

Even in the case if your particular group as well? Surely, this goes both ways so you accept negative stereotypes being used to judge you as a person?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 06:04 PM
3

More often then not, I find the "outliers" outweigh the people that fit the stereotype, so no.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 05:53 PM
3

It's less of a matter of censoring people, just that people who tend to uphold stereotypes as "truths" use it to treat people negatively because of it or jump to conclusions based on appearance. They also seem to blissfully ignore any negative stereotypes held against their group.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 05:29 PM
6

How is judging one based on their individual merits rather than judging them based on whatever arbitrary group they belong in "censoring truths"? What are the "truths" here that you are referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 04:40 PM
2

Because like I said in my example, a positive stereotype leads to negative consequences for those that don't fit the mold. "Women are better nurturers than men." You might have heard. But if a woman chooses to be child-free, she's questioned, or has her decision dismissed with things like, "Oh, you'll change your mind someday!" This also has a negative affect on men as well. While thankfully more and more divorces involving children are settled with joint custody, many cases still default to fav…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 04:13 PM
4

Take a butter knife and beat the jar senseless on the lid's edges. It should open a lot easier. c:
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 02:14 PM
5

I think that every person is an individual with a series of characteristics and strengths and weaknesses. Saying "x gender is better at y" is bad, even if said stereotype is positive. To put into perspective of how this could be bad, take for example "positive" stereotypes placed on people based on race, "black people are better in athletic sports". While on the surface this seems like a good thing, those who don't fit that stereotype are often judged for it. Black people are "acting white" for …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 02:11 PM
2

You guys are friends, and that's cool. Though I would comment on the fact that you seem to obsess over her sexually...if it's becoming a problem where it's affecting your everyday life, I'd probably go to some sort of counseling to get over this hurdle.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 10:24 PM
1

Well, yeah, usually if you have a gut reaction that your SO is cheating on you, it's best to commit the minor misdeed of snooping and confirm/deny your suspicions. Usually...they can be right. But I think in the case of TRP, they take this concept and go way overboard. You keylog a woman's phone, just because she can't be trusted because she's a woman. It doesn't matter if the woman in question had done nothing to make you question her, or if you had been in a completely faithful relationship pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 06:32 AM
6

Don't correct me, bot, I'm a strong empowered womyn who don't need no man.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 06:24 AM
1

I could definately agree with this, however, these are people they are in relationships with and/or are married to. There is obviously some level of trust if they are this close. This thread in particular doesn't mention something along the lines of, "Until you are certain you can trust her.", but rather, "Keylog her computer/phone because women can't be trusted no matter what." I feel if you have that much of a complex, then relationships aren't for these people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 06:18 AM
8

And yet still men come out with a 5 point average IQ advantage... so you see how you aren't gaining any ground here yet? And yet you ignore that your sources compared development in children or using an SAT test, which no longer tests for IQ and and slowly becoming a dying form of accepting people into college? You won't be able to credibly use this excuse for much longer I hope you realize. "Excuse". Sure. Also, you ignored my sources of women, despite having an equal opportunity, are held back…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 05:05 AM
7

That would be convenient for you to focus on one single aspect of why I think women should not have the right to vote, but very well. You didn't cite sources for you other claims (such as women being more emotional than logical), so I focused on this aspect. What you're forgetting about IQs and the sexes is that men have a much wider spread of IQs than women which means that for every woman with an IQ of 120 there are about twice as many men with an IQ of 140-150. This also means that on average…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 04:17 AM
4

I mostly want to focus on you claiming women shouldn't have equal rights due to this IQ gap. Let's say this is true. Now, based off of this here, the average IQ score of an average American is 98. So, since 5 points matter a lot, we can obviously tell that people from Hong Kong have on average higher IQs. Therefore, I call for the revoking of rights for all people with an IQ below that of an average Hong Konger. It is apparent that Hong Kongers have larger brains, more gray matter, and better sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 03:18 AM
1

Well, my boyfriend is a high school dropout that got his GED, and is overweight, so I got those traits in a partner. The shortness thing wouldn't really bother me, given that I'm short myself. The job thing wouldn't bother me either, so long as said job wasn't something he had in mind as a long-term career (like say he was working this job to get through college). The lack of car doesn't bother me; as long as he can get to work okay on his own and doesn't expect me to be his personal chauffeur, …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 02:19 AM
4

Certainly you have sources on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 02:14 AM
1

It's not difficult to treat someone like a person. You pull the whole server/waiter argument, but I pointed out how you can still treat that person like a person while still expecting services from them (which they are paid for). Have you never heard of saying something like "Please" and "Thank you" and holding a casual conversation about That Sports Team or the weather? By being nice and polite to everyone you meet, yes you are treating them like a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/14 02:13 AM
1

That's a little different because they are paid to be there, and you are paying for McDonald's services. In your situation however, you didn't treat the McDonald's cashier inhumanely. If you were to treat them inhumanely, it'd be you doing something along the lines of saying something like, "Hurry up, you lazy fatass.", "Why can't you do something so SIMPLE.", whining about how you are so inconvenienced because McDonald's hired a cashier that couldn't get you a Coke in .10 seconds, etc. Essentia…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/14 08:46 PM
5

I would agree with this, somewhat. Perhaps some guys beginning their Red Pill journey are a bit angry and feel they've been lied to by society on how to attract women. However, I don't think the, "It's just guys in their anger phase," argument doesn't account for all things when you have TRP Endorsed Contributors, i.e. people that have been there for years, start spouting misogynistic bullshit. At a certain point, it stops being statements people say out of anger and they don't really mean, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 04:06 AM
1

Not every person is fit for raising children. I think societal pressure is placed upon both men and women to pop out kids; like it's this mandatory thing everyone must go through or they will get strange looks for being childless or expressing their desire to NOT have kids. By no means should anyone's value be placed on the fact they pooped some kids out. Plus, there's the fact that prior to the Industrial Revolution, the father also had a major responsibility in helping raise the child and ensu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/14 09:56 PM
2

Anecdotal, but communication has personally helped my relationship. Sometimes for example, I might say or do something that is taken the wrong way by my boyfriend, and of course he gets angry or upset. But then I clarify, and things are quickly patched up. I can't understand people who'd rather resort to passive-aggressive tactics first ("the silent treatment" for example) because you might not be as clear to the other person, so then they become agitated, and the problem doesn't get fixed. I do…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/14 02:09 PM
1

My guess is when people want to hook up for casual sex, physical attractiveness is all that really matters. Since TRP advocates lifting weights and improving yourself physically, they of course have a better chance of success with this. I'd say the negative aspects of TRP (like adapting the dark triad traits) matter a lot less to women in this regard because they only want a poke and that's all. It's not that BP men are just all ugly basement dwellers, just on average, they aren't looking for ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/14 05:08 PM
1

Well, it's hard to think of someone in a positive light when they think I'm inferior due my sex. Many people outside the RP cult have differing views on many things, and I can respect those so long as they don't infringe or threaten to infringe on peoples rights or I'm treated lesser for said opinions. Unfortunately, the RP cult tends to whine about women having rights and be generally degrading to them. So I obviously don't have much of a reason to respect them or anyone who spouts RP beliefs. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 05:47 PM
1

I actually disagree. I think this is great advice; just that many don't take it the right way. "Just be yourself" doesn't mean you are supposed to change zero about yourself; rather what should be said is "Be the best version of yourself". Work upon your strengths, recognize weaknesses and work on them. Say you're a little overweight. Start eating healthier. Or maybe you're good at guitar. Start practicing to become better. I don't think inhabiting dark triad traits is good for anyone, and unles…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 03:57 PM
1

Spoken like a true cult member.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 03:42 PM
1

AKA "The Outside World"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 08:49 PM
1

I think everyone could agree that it is the woman's fault for choosing to drink/smoke while pregnant. If she made the choice completely with being sober or wasn't forced to, that is. There are other factors that could affect the baby, such as genes, and the age of the father as well. However, this analogy is very poor if it's an attempt to compare it to being raped while drunk. A woman drinking does not mean she's consenting to sex. And if she's drunk to the point where she can't make a consciou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 02:04 PM
1

Hardest job? Probably not. Anybody can shit out a kid, feed it nothing but Kraft Mac n' Cheese every night and let it run wild. Aside from obvious breaking of laws (physical or sexual abuse, neglect, etc.), you can't really "fail" at this job. However, I think the more you apply to the job, the more invested you are in your child, the more difficult it becomes. A lazy parent can simply choose the easy route and spank their kid for every misdeed, or a good parent can choose to discipline their ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 06:05 PM
1

From this website, a person at 5'3" at exactly 100 lbs has a BMI of 17.7. Underweight BMI is anything below 18.5. Anecdotal, but I used to be this weight and it was dangerously unhealthy for me; I would easily feel faint if I didn't eat right away. I think it's ridiculous for /u/Whisper here to suggest that a woman below 5'4" should weigh less than 100lbs. Certainly BMI is different for everyone, but it should be ideal to aim for the average or be close to it (18.5-24.9).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/14 09:22 PM
1

"Hi, nice to finally meet you in person! Before we head out, I wanted to let you know I'd like you to have a safe-word. You know, for after the date when I take you home and try to fuck you. That way I know I'm not raping you, even if you say 'no' a few times. Does 'unitard' work for you?" I don't know why you and others here assume that I'm suggesting to instill a safety word when you just met someone or when sex isn't even the topic of discussion. Either way, this is just ridiculous. No thanks…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 01:45 PM
2

What makes you think she doesn't respect herself? Perhaps she liked her body enough that she wanted to show it off. I think everyone can agree, yeah, flashing your tits isn't such a great idea. But that doesn't and should never excuse the behavior the men displayed. And asking them all to stay sober is Disney World. See how easy it is to excuse the men's bad choices for you, but to completely trash on a woman who did a stupid thing. You also uphold sexist views against men, as if they are stupid…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 05:18 PM
1

Well, if say my SO was a female and I met them as female, I probably wouldn't be attracted to them, given I'm not really attracted to women. They would probably be a really close friend though. But if say my SO now came out to me as trans, that might be a different story because I have had been a relationship with them to this point. Plus, not every trans person gets bottom surgery, so the genital issue might not even be an issue at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 12:44 AM
2

Maybe I'm just crazy, but the majority of the girls in that album aren't even really fat..
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 12:29 AM
1

I don't know if it's one of those things that should be mandatory to reveal, but if it's in the sense of a relationship, both partners should be honest if asked. If someone with a high partner count is a dealbreaker, then it'd be better to be out and in the open. Personally, if I was single, I don't know if I'd care to know, so I'd probably never be bothered to ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 12:22 AM
3

I think the only acceptable reason for circumcising a male is if it's a medically needed, such as in cases where the foreskin does not open properly or the child is born with it sealed completely. Other than that, the choice of circumcision should be left up to the person with the penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 02:16 PM
1

Alright, I wanted to have an opportunity to be able to properly listen to this since it is quite long. Anyways, I'm not sure if you're trying to label me as a Feminist for disagreeing with you, but let's tackle the points. Point 1 of the video is indicating "Well, it happens to guys, too." Of course. I've seen examples of male objectification, and had properly called it out in the past (example a tumblr SJW screeching about female objectification in one breath and then oogling over a pic of a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 09:50 PM
1

You did the first time. That's two provably lies you've told in this thread so far by my count. You want the evidence? Scroll up. Let's read what I said: What makes you think women lie about what they want? For example, a woman could simply change her mind. Or maybe that different women want different things. This was a direct response to you saying this: If women didn't lie insessently about what they want, no man on earth would have much issue learning to socialize with other people. My quote …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 09:41 PM
-1

You are in denial that women lie about what they want. Never denied that certain women lied. See, you are acting like a person who tries and use their experience to speak for others. "Well, I've felt God, so therefore God is real." Your experience cannot be properly repeated in a control group to prove it is true. Your experience is also extremely Western-centric. I'm certain if you moved to another country, you'd have a completely different experience. Hell, if you stayed out of clubs, you'd pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 01:35 PM
0

Because they are. Some blog post by a dude bro isn't going to sway me to your misogynistic beliefs. I have a little more self confidence than that, come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 05:18 PM
0

Can you at least try with this stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 01:50 PM
0

Let me make something clear here: topics like LMR can possibly lead to rape. Now, I don't know if you've ever raped someone. Heck, you might not ever rape someone with LMR. But I truly think you are playing with fire here, especially since you've stated you don't want a woman who is sex controlling (says no). Before TRP, I couldn't find good women because I had been trained to be a Nice Guy. So you had to go to the opposite extreme? Interesting you call them some pals. This implies you're one of…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 12:28 PM
0

I said women, nebulously, lie incessantly about what they want. Alright. Now prove this with a scientific study. This doesn't include Red Pill blogs that just spout shit based on "field reports". Nice Guys are now famous for being hated by women, when women say that they want nice men. There's a difference between nice guys and men who are nice. Nice guys are the type, who go out and treat women nicely for an ulterior motive (to have a girlfriend or sex). Then, after putting in a certain amount …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 05:33 AM
0

Because you just have to step outside to have your "evidence" proven wrong. Again, if you can provide a study proving 100% of women all inherently lie about what they want, then you are right. You can't provide this though, so your statements are false. Until then, you are incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 05:07 AM
0

Burden of proof lies upon you. You have failed to provide proper evidence that proves "Women inherently lie about what they want." Any "evidence" provided cannot be taken as fact because it is anecdotal. Even the ones that were studies STILL does not prove "Women inherently lie about what they want." because these studies did not prove that all women lie. This is not, "hamstering" or a "game", you're just bad at this because your beliefs are impossible to prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 04:40 AM
0

You win a debate with no evidence to back up your claim. Congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 04:27 AM
0

anecdotal. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 02:19 AM
0

You sound like someone who has never had consensual sex in her life. I have. Link 1 Anecdotal. Still does not prove all women lie about what they want. In fact, this just proves that NAWALT. Great job. "While almost everyone has sexual fantasies, previous research into the subject has found between 31 and 62% of women have rape fantasies." Where's that magical 100% to prove all women lie about what they actually want? Come on, where's that undeniable proof? Link 2 Still anedotal because not all …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/14 11:15 PM
0

You just introduced a new subject rather than admitting to your lie because you are doing this thing called hamstering. You may have heard me mention it before. Dodge accountability more why don't you. No, I brought it up to provide an example of the opposite happening (rape apology of a woman). The topic is that women lie incessantly about what they want. Which you still haven't proven. When a woman cheats, everyone is quick to rush and say not all women are like that. When a woman threatens se…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/14 09:04 PM
0

The hamster wouldn't allow you to acknowledge it, but it wasn't just one woman who lied here. If you had paid attention, you'd know an entire studio audience on cable TV supported this woman's decision to listen to her girlfriends' suggestions to essentially rape her husband. If this was allowed on cable TV then that means there were at least a few thousand women watching that episode who weren't morally outraged by this woman's decision to--what else can you call it--rape her husband. She went …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/14 02:02 PM
-1

Why fuck at all if you don't know they're someone you want to marry? I can understand being young and believing the person you're with the first time is the person you just really believe is the one and so you give in and have sex. We all make mistakes. How does a piece of paper make it any different? "Okay, the state recognizes you are a couple. Have fun kids!" I remember being young and thinking I'd found love, but she cheated. As horny as I was, she really had to coax me into sex, promising m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/14 02:01 AM
0

Boom! Checkmate. But let's continue anyway. Great, you proved that a woman lied. You still didn't prove all women lie, which was the point. There's nothing wrong with being "sex positive" in that you talk about sex openly, but sex outside of marriage eliminates a major incentive for a man to get married. If you're riding the carousel, you're not someone a man with options is going to choose to marry, ever. Oh, I see you speak for all men, too. First example you have provided is stupid. The post …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/14 01:55 AM
3

The sample size is sizeable enough that I'm confident enough to tell you I believe it's true. Again, this is your experience and yours alone. Plenty of people can speak to the contrary. It is obvious women have sexual interests. That's what makes it so insane when women also try to claim it aint like that. Watch how any professional victim Feminist talks about the subject of sex. Anita Sarkeesian is a perfect example. I find many women who are very sex positive and aren't ashamed in their sexual…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/14 06:11 PM
0

You're assuming I do these things because...?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/14 07:18 AM
5

So, "experience" therefore allows you to pass it off as true. Unless you met every single woman on the face of this Earth, it cannot be assumed as so. Reading your long answer, I have to say there's a lot of weird logic here. Let's break it down. When I say women lie about what they want, incessantly, I mean that there is this giant nebulous agreement among women that women are simultaneously void of any sexuality whatsoever How is this even possible when women recognize sexualities? Homosexuali…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/14 06:50 AM
1

Are you quite sure about that? I'm 5'3" and 110lbs, and my BMI says I'm just barely at a normal weight. If I was just even at 100, I'd be vastly underweight. I know BMI doesn't take muscle mass into consideration, but that's pretty much a dangerously low weight all around.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/14 03:45 AM
3

I mean, I figured that was the point of dating, to figure out what you exactly want from a partner. One who is young, man or woman, might not have all the answers of what they want right away.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/14 03:24 AM
3

What makes you think women lie about what they want? For example, a woman could simply change her mind. Or maybe that different women want different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/14 03:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter