TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mggrath-it Archive

View 6 posts and 100 comments by mggrath-it on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Not just the last 2-3 years. I've seen it be misused since the late 2010s. Remember the Joker movie was described as a movie for "Incels"?
/r/MensRights17/07/26 08:47 AM
-1

I remember seeing some claiming the reason for why lesbian relationships have higher rates is because these women dated men in the past and were abused by those men. So they were either blaming abusive men in the past for why the lesbians are abusive now or they're claiming the abuse the lesbians faced were not by other lesbians but by men in the past and it's counted in the stats.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 08:40 AM
3

Something else that often gets left out by many of these people is the weird, creepy, incest, predatory stuff around this boymom trend. It has been called out to some extent, but there's been more discussions about "misogyny" and "internalized misogyny". Oh, and genders reversed, the girldad version would also be called misogynistic but also much more people would call it "pedophillic" and predatory (and a lot sooner too).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/26 01:59 AM
7

Exactly. Same feminists complained about violence against women in video games, even though male characters suffered from even more violence in video games. If video game violence was 100% directed at male characters, whether from female protagonists or male ones, you would not hear feminists complaining about this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 02:08 AM
2

They took the original model and exaggerated her curves for Eve. I never mentioned anything about unrealistic curves. However, to address your "unrealistic curves" point: unrealistic doesn't mean impossible. It means it's not very common at all for the majority of women to achieve. Rare and super rare fit the definition of "unrealistic". Stellar Blade took a Korean model who already had curves and enhanced it further for Eve's character in the video game. That's a pretty unrealistic body to achi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 01:04 AM
2

I made a response to the OP a bit below about this concept.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 12:11 AM
3

Both, it's related to both, but I was more referring to Western beauty standards and Western media that feminists have used to coin the "pedo male gaze" term. Below is kind of long, with my own thoughts and criticisms too. Both East Asian beauty standards and Western beauty standards have been attacked by feminists and called pedophilic. When I was referring to the "pedo male gaze," I was referring to the West, as I've seen feminists talk about this. The concept of the male gaze is a Western fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 12:11 AM
7

You firstly noted characters in Resident Evil, etc, are attractive. You then claimed characters in Stellar Blade are unattractive due to their tasteless designs. However, to most who played this game, the characters and their designs in Stellar Blade were considered sexy and attractive. So, perhaps for you the characters are unattractive due to their designs, but not to most. "Sex sells" is a critical commentary, not a guide to action. I wasn't using "sex sells" as a guide to action. I was makin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 01:25 PM
5

and also there are games with just tasteless character design (like Stellar Blade (both of them), But both games have sexualized characters, and the first game, with the main character Eve, has exaggerated curves and is considered very sexy. I strongly think videogames don't need any sexy characters whatsoever, in order to be fun Sex sells in everything. Video games are visual. People, generally, would prefer to see and play as hot characters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 12:55 PM
29

Wait until you go deeper into the rabbit hole and find the concept of "pedo male gaze".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 10:27 AM
1

I mean, if they're short and attractive and being called cute. It doesn't mean it's on the level of a poodle or child. Considering Taylor Lautner was called cute (and also hot) and was lusted after sexually by middle aged women. Even Justin Bieber was called cute/very cute and lusted after by women. If a man/teen boy is short and attractive and is called cute, it doesn't mean it's women humiliating/degrading/infantilizing them.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 08:36 PM
4

Please explain to me how I'm an incel. Nothing I've said indicates "incel". Respond to which parts indicate I'm an incel or the parts you disagree with.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:11 PM
3

Who is this "but when someone else does the same to them, it's suddenly not fine anymore"? You honestly think men will find it "not fine" if women were to check them out. You're honestly truly saying this? The example in the image is a false equivalence too. Also, it's more likely the reverse of what you claim. When men check women out, the women are generally disgusted, especially when it's an ugly man doing it. When women check men out, it's seen as ok. I've repeatedly seen this. I've repeated…
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:03 PM
3

True, but it seems like, in their minds, it is the equivalence. Women feel disgusted by (ugly) men checking them out, in the same way they think straight men feel when gay men check them out.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:59 AM
2

She mentions the Epstein files and the global pedo ring and how "men have done nothing but move on ASAP". I've seen other feminists make the same claim. But all I've seen is the complete opposite. Men did not move on ASAP. The Epstein files has been a regular news occurrence since 2020. Men on social media, from large content creators and their largely male followers, to men across the political spectrum and just random men on social media, have called this out and want those involved held accou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/26 05:35 PM
3

You're getting disliked but I do think the internet accelerated it. Many of these ideas, whether feminist or manosphere, or dating apps or social media, spread through the internet. Did the internet start this? I don't know, since such ideas were already spreading prior to the existence of the internet e.g. declining birth rates, fewer people marrying, etc, were already occurring before the internet was really a thing.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 09:35 PM
44

I'm seeing many, many misrepresented videos and stats regularly. This 62 million men one, the Diary of an "incel" CEO clip taken out of context, Sam Harris' old taken out of context clip saying "Why can't we eat babies?", etc, etc. Reactionary content, clickbait content, out of context content is where it's at.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 06:22 PM
1

man is about three times more likely to abuse on a per hour basis than a woman. I'm 12 years late to the party but those stats and the article mentioned are about laid off parents, so it can't be generalized to parents as a whole. Being laid off can and does lead to stress related things, which can influence abuse. Moreover, the person you responded to is still correct. Women abuse kids more than fathers do, on average.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 06:20 PM
1

I mean, the 4b movement's been mocked in Korea. It's also been mocked in the West too. When it was going viral, there were many supporting it but many people mocked it heavily too.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:42 PM
1

An average being "only an average" doesn't mean age is irrelevant, it means age is a reliable indicator with natural variation around it. That variation is exactly why clinicians use a cutoff like 13 rather than a single point like 11. You can't just dismiss age as a factor because exceptions exist; the existence of a strong average correlation between age and pubertal onset means age is absolutely a relevant variable here. Saying puberty is physical doesn't make age irrelevant, the two aren't m…
/r/MensRights09/03/26 02:52 PM
1

Hence why the DSM-5 uses 13 as their practical cut off point. Puberty mostly begins before 13, roughly around 10-12 years old, on average. But some are late starting puberty - hence the DSM-5 uses 13 as the practical cut off to capture these late bloomers. Also, I never claimed puberty is only an age thing; however, to deny age as being a factor is incorrect too, as there's an average age in which one begins puberty. Boys also start puberty, on average, a little later than girls. Even the majori…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:42 PM
1

Often I see high school teacher had sex with her students. And those are often good looking women. The good looking female teachers are more likely to make the news and get more attention, which leads to the belief that most female teachers with male students are good looking. But many cases they're not good looking, they simply don't get as much media attention or attention from viewers. Crazy!! Actually most child molesters news I see are women. Maybe because its more sensational but it just m…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 09:56 AM
1

Pedophillia, according to the DSM-5, requires attraction toward prepubescence, which they state is 13 and under.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:02 AM
2

And this is what feminists will use as proof to show female sex offenders are treated more harshly in terms of sentencing compared to male offenders. As well as talk about how the men who abused girls in the Epstein stuff got away with it but women, like this one, get treated far worse.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 03:57 AM
1

You don’t have any issue with the fact women can get away with raping little boys/underage boys? Or that society doesn’t take it seriously when it happens to boys? I never claimed this. I literally said right at the beginning: "Eh, my problem is the double standard and how people justify one, not the other, even if they're similar and both consent." And also, even if their reaction was positive it doesn’t make it right. They may be thinking of the physical experience, but that doesn’t mean no ha…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 03:27 AM
0

What? Women would 100% be expected to protect their own children. Even the average feminist would want and expect the parent to protect their child, even with their lives.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 12:54 AM
-6

It depends where it was posted. If it was posted on a subreddit for men, you'd get more sympathetic responses. But, genders reversed it's not that common for men to be approached by women, unless he's good looking - which is probably the type of comments you'd see. You can't assume genders reversed he'd be called an incel by most of the comments. You'r more than likely to see comments like "it's normal for men not to be approached by women. Go ask the women out". If the commenters were women, yo…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 12:36 AM
14

They tell the truth, initially, but won't push it further... hmm.... wonder why?
/r/MensRights18/02/26 08:03 PM
0

I'm aware, bud. I'm telling you that neither did the person you replied to, and yet you responded to them as if they did. As if your outliers were evidence of some huge hole in a statement that they did not make. That's the problem. Please keep up I've repeatedly said the examples I gave are not outliers at all - do you not understand volume vs. proportional? Also, you say you're aware I wasn't speaking in all or zero terms, yet you accuse me of responding to the original poster as if they meant…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 04:27 AM
3

They are comparing disabled men to another disabled man. There is a huge disparity around how people experience disability- and the individual challenges that each person has. No, there's a huge difference between the 2. There's variability between disabled people, however, the examples these women provided are of disabled men who have some function and movement. They're comparing their experience with disabled men who had some movement to a man who can't even move or speak. It's a false equival…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 02:54 AM
1

And yet your response doesn't address the link I posted. Complete non-sequitur. The link I provided proves actually abusive men still win custody of their kids. Thus, proving, mothers are the ones not favored in the courts.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 02:45 AM
0

I never claimed all or zero. I'm pointing out there's a greater number of men who receive 0 or very little prison time. These are not statistical outliers. Men commit far more crimes compared to women, so there's going to be a greater volume of men who get very little or a high amount of prison time. Volume wise, there's significantly more cases where men get very little or 0 prison time compared to women. However, proportionally women are more likely to get very little or 0 prison time. On your…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 02:43 AM
0

The person I responded to said "maximum privilege and minimal accountability for women, minimal privilege and maximum accountability for men." - I pointed out there's cases where that's not true, at all. His statment was extreme. There's nuance to the argument. Feminists claim men get away with it, citing cases where men get 0 prison time and show examples where women get years in prison. OP is doing a similar argument, but just genders reversed. I'm pointing out it's more nuanced. And the best …
/r/MensRights18/02/26 01:25 AM
-55

Eh, not completely. There's crimes committed by men in the UK that don't lead to prison time e.g. there's cases of men with possession of CP, committed sex crimes, etc, whether committed by minorities or not that lead to no prison time. On average, yes, in most countries, women do receive leniency in conviction rates and prison sentencing.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 11:38 PM
3

Right, and yet there's tons of people currently claiming no one's outraged, despite tons of people wanting accountability and simply accusing people of being abusers for being mentioned in the files. Oh, and cue the feminists claiming people will eventually say, "there's a moral panic, it's gone too far", because they think people let men get away with it and don't like it when men are being held accountable and hows society normalizes men's abuse of women and girls. They also claim it's like me…
/r/MensRights16/02/26 08:02 PM
13

Not just traffic, take part in the abuse too.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 07:56 PM
4

Not sure about cute, unless they look like Taylor Lautner. If they do look like him, then cue the middle aged women lusting after him, as they did with Taylor Lautner when he was 16/17.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 07:55 PM
1

I see this a lot. The recent Epstein files = Abuse of girls is normalized in society and men can get away with it. Keanu Reeves dates a similar aged woman and got praise for it = The bar for men is so low. Rich and powerful men aren't put in jail from rape accusations = Accusing men or rape doesn't affect their lives.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 03:13 PM
1

Unsure about lying. Most are clearly true: https://www.businessinsider.com/parental-alienation-syndrome-father-alleged-child-abuse-win-custody-case-2023-5?mibextid=Zxz2cZ
/r/MensRights16/02/26 03:08 PM
1

Not sure about mothers being favored. Clearly shows opposite. Even this proves it: https://www.businessinsider.com/parental-alienation-syndrome-father-alleged-child-abuse-win-custody-case-2023-5?mibextid=Zxz2cZ
/r/MensRights16/02/26 03:08 PM
1

Unsubstantiated? You sure? https://www.businessinsider.com/parental-alienation-syndrome-father-alleged-child-abuse-win-custody-case-2023-5?mibextid=Zxz2cZ
/r/MensRights16/02/26 03:07 PM
0

I mean, read this article, it clearly shows it happens: https://www.businessinsider.com/parental-alienation-syndrome-father-alleged-child-abuse-win-custody-case-2023-5?mibextid=Zxz2cZ
/r/MensRights16/02/26 03:06 PM
33

They're comparing disabled men to a man who can't even move. There's a difference, a huge difference. Also, whenever I see women, these types of women, shit on men - all I know is, halo effect reduces a lot of that hate.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 07:22 AM
-2

But the study showed the opposite...... It showed it favored men, not women.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 03:26 PM
2

She also said 0% of women and girls have been rapists in history, and then cited the UK's definition of rape as her proof. She's also said that when she released her book titled something like "women are blamed for everything", she claimed she received a coordinated and targeted harassment campaign by thousands of men and had her computer hacked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/26 12:21 PM
17

I hate these extreme types of comments. I've seen women claim "accusing a man of rape doesn't affect his life", and they'll use rich, powerful men as their examples. With your argument, it's also on the extreme end too. There are examples of men accused of rape, real or otherwise, that don't lead to any arrests. There's more nuance than what you or feminists say.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 09:03 AM
2

I'm not sure what planet you live on, but, in media, men are more likely to be called pedos, rapists, sex offenders, sexual assaulters, in cases of statutory rape. So you're actually incorrect. This is documented in media analysis studies, showing that in comparable cases, men/male teachers are more likely to be given harsher language compared to female teachers - again, even in comparable cases. This isn't to say that media always calls men such names and always gives harsher language, however,…
/r/MensRights15/02/26 04:01 AM
1

This is a complete and utter non-sequitur. You're arguing from a philosophical perspective. I'm simply pointing out the technical part as to why these models have "bias". You're attempting to philosophize this argument. The basic mechanisms behind these AI models bias is from their training data, the filters the developed implemented and fine-tuning the data. You can argue, from a philosophical standpoint, what "trained" means, but it's irrelevant to the original discussion. Moreover, your point…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 01:36 AM
1

Yep. Yet I've seen articles downplay women's roles as just "creating and organizing the men's diaries, getting them snacks". Or simply redacting their names, assuming they're victims.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:22 AM
1

Eh, my problem is the double standard and how people justify one, not the other, even if they're similar and both consent. It shouldn't be labelled sexual aggression if the man wasn't, it shouldn't be if the woman wasn't. But you're more likely to see this applied to men (and sometimes to women, like this article did). Boys, and often many teens, boys or girls, are affected by the societal reaction to it, not by the act in itself, if no violence or coercion had been used. I very much agree with …
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:21 AM
9

Same ones would probably say the media manipulates people, makes people distrust foreigners, and calls others racist, etc, for generalizing. Besides, halo effect will make most of that fear disappear quick.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:10 AM
2

Saw the same thing during last year where some 14 year old girl wielded a weapon to defend her sister in Scotland or something against some creep. Bunch of comments said Britain has no men, creating cringe AI images. When in reality, plenty of men have protested and complained about these types of issues of foreign migrants causing issues (even getting jail time for it), and some even protected girls in real life too. Besides, Musk got rejected by the number 1 phile in history. And he's a grifte…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:08 AM
1

It's more than likely their training model (training data bias), safety guardrails/filters the developers implemented, and potentially fine-tuning the data.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 10:32 PM
10

You're aware you can apply this to girls, too, right? So many girls in schools have fantasized about their attractive male teachers, about male celebs, etc, but they're still more likely to be viewed as victims, regardless if it's men or women judging. You're only applying this "treating us all like asexuals" to boys, even though girls aren't too different from boys in this regard. I don't think we should use women centric tactics and apply them to men. These tactics are dishonest at best, do we…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 10:28 PM
5

That's something that gets missed out a lot. Many simply mention she recruited girls for Epstein. Nope, she did more. Victims pointed out she abused them directly and was the "mastermind" behind the whole thing.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 11:12 PM
5

Sure, but, again, someone who's been featured in these areas, has a platform, etc, is a bit more than just "sexist person is sexist". It's a published person with an audience who is sexist. A bit different than a random online user who doesn't have much of a platform. And, again, the point is, her beliefs are not uncommon, and it's being spouted by someone like her, a "women's sexual health advocate" with a platform and followers. And, to an extent, it does mean something. People with some kind …
/r/MensRights12/02/26 11:10 PM
1

Yes, it's not an uncommon belief, at least among feminists.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 08:29 PM
25

This is her supposed resume: Women’s sexual health advocate. President sheprojectmed. Seen on thedailyshow, nytimes, sciam. Published in asjrnl. 20 med textbooks changed. WashUBME. And it's a fair thing to bring up this person's beliefs, considering she has quite a few followers, mostly female audience. And her beliefs about female on male rape aren't uncommon either.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 08:26 PM
18

100%. It annoys me with the feminist misogyny angle. Claiming it's misogyny because a woman's in prison and not men. Even though: 1) Epstein was arrested first in 2019, 1 year before she was, and was denied bail but died in prison before he could face trial. 2) She didn't take the fall for men, she literally trafficked girls and abused some herself. 3) This erases other women's involvement in the Epstein network as either facilitators, coordinators, party organizers, or just knew and didn't do a…
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:21 PM
3

Come on, it's a campaign for violence against women and girls. It should be obvious they're insinuating the perpetrators are men/boys. The article quite literally says: "Developed in collaboration with organisations across the VAWG sector, FCB London’s campaign uses a bold creative device to expose the insidious nature of these everyday behaviours to enable young men and boys to recognise that these are forms of abuse."
/r/MensRights09/02/26 10:34 PM
1

Supposedly, channel 4 did an analysis on it. They found VAWG includes 2 million men, and no one under 16.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 10:32 PM
1

This is mostly a myth. It confuses testosterone levels (which do peak for men around that age) with actual sexuality, which is way more complex. Sexuality, the combination of sexual desire, attraction, behavior, and identity, doesn't just 'peak' at specific ages. Sexual satisfaction, desire, and function depend on health, relationships, stress, confidence, and a ton of individual factors. Plenty of research shows people can have great sex lives well into older age. The '19 vs 35' thing comes fro…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 05:19 PM
3

Fair. But I never said anything about expecting any justice from this. You've misunderstood my original point. My whole point is that it's not misogyny, considering Epstein was arrested too - but didn't get convicted because he's dead. This whole Epstein stuff has turned into a culture war topic. Liberals saying Trump and the conservatives are the pedos. Conservatives saying Clinton and the liberals are the pedos. Feminists claiming misogyny. Others saying "normies don't even care about this ped…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 04:48 PM
4

I've done this already. Their default is usually cases where men get away with it, compare it to examples where women get harsh sentencing and then claim women get it worse. But they ignore the general data and simply rely on cherry-picked data.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 03:22 PM
5

And that's the issue with these feminists, they'll see powerful men getting away with it, or cherry-pick examples of regular men getting away with it and then claiming some double standard that women are treated more harshly. When in reality, women receive plea deals more often than men (proportionally) and receive lower sentencing, on average, even when all variables are controlled for.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 03:07 PM
4

This is besides the point. Even if there's only a few in the files, which is what we're talking about - the Epstein files, they shouldn't be redacted.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 01:15 PM
2

Interesting, because I've seen feminists claim Maxwell being the only one in prison is misogyny. Meanwhile, they're assuming all the women are victims and removing them from the files (even though email exchanges can prove otherwise e.g. Princess of Norway, Prince Andrew's ex-wife).
/r/MensRights04/02/26 01:14 PM
2

I've literally seen comments say women can't rape men because all women have to whisper is "fuck me" and the men will come crawling....
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:34 PM
14

Ok.. So? How's this related to this sub? He cheated.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 03:37 PM
1

Never said otherwise, was simply pointing out the ages as he said he might have been a pre teen. Besides, when the story broke out and video evidence resurfaced, the reactions were mixed. Half were calling her a predator, other half were saying the 80s were different or were saying they're basically the same age.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 03:40 PM
2

It's quite obvious many countries don't consider female on male rape a thing in law. The USA for years didn't consider female on male rape as part of the statistics. The link you provided proves my exact point, which I've seen before, is using old data from when female on male rape wasn't even considered a thing and wasn't even part of the statistics as the definition of rape was penetration. You're literally linking something that's old, based on data that's using a different definition of rape…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 08:49 PM
3

This is true, however, it's a known thing female sex offenders, on average, receive lower sentencing and are more likely to get plea deals compared to male offenders. The issue is volume. There's more male offenders caught as a whole, so you'll see a greater volume of male offenders not receiving a sentencing. However, proportionally, female offenders get less time.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 08:39 PM
3

Quite obvious who.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 08:36 PM
1

I never claimed they were a complete equivalence. You're right that abortion and infanticide aren't the same thing, but that's not what makes this hypocritical. The hypocrisy isn't about the act itself (abortion vs. murder), it's about the principle being applied. If someone says "sex-selective elimination of girls is wrong" but then celebrates "sex-selective elimination of boys," they're being hypocritical. They're applying one moral standard when girls are targeted, and a completely different …
/r/MensRights04/01/26 08:01 PM
2

She was 19, he was 15.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 07:43 PM
2

Right, that's the thing, she's already said pretty bad things about men in the past. I find it funny that people were saying "but she supported Amber Heard. Why would she not care about male victims when she's vocal of her support for victims". As if this means anything. As if this means she cares about male victims.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 07:43 PM
4

Should read the comments under this post about the Julia Fox one, many defending her, saying she didn't know: https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/10lkxwx/julia_fox_comments_on_a_tiktokers_sa_story_saying/
/r/MensRights04/01/26 04:45 AM
78

Jenny McCarthy (late 30s) back in 2012, sexually assaulted Justin Bieber (18) on stage at an awards show. She grabbed him, kissed his neck and groped his butt. She even joked about it in the post show interview saying something like "it's like cougar rape". Truly ironically, she's complained about Hollywood harassment toward women. Katy Perry backstage with Justin Bieber (17), both were hugging, she lowered her hands to his butt and touched it. During an interview, female celebrities were asking…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 04:11 AM
20

Riley Reid is her name. She's a porn star. I assume this is the woman you're talking about.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 03:57 AM
2

Sure, but if we base it off what the woman in the image is saying, she somehow got a test to find out in as little as 6 weeks. Plus, my main issue is, even if that woman is ragebaiting, the replies clearly agree or celebrate it - which is hypocritical if they complained about men killing girls in the past and they instead celebrate when it happens to boys.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 12:39 AM
5

Isn't this massively hypocritical? They say "men did it to girls in the past for years", but the difference is - these feminists complain about it, but then turn around and celebrate a woman aborting sons?
/r/MensRights04/01/26 12:37 AM
1

Google AI is massively overstating. It uses data from studies that have already been criticized, have poor methodology, etc. I even ran Google AIs answer through Grok, ChatGPT and Claude and they said the same as I said. My AI responses are posted here under this post.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 09:53 PM
0

The issue is, men are more likely to say boys are lucky. Men are more likely to give women lower sentencing, on average - also known as the chivalry effect. Women, in general, are more punitive toward female sex offenders compared to men. Men are more lenient toward sex offenders compared to women, on average. But men, on the extreme ends i.e. vigilante justice hunters, will brutalize male sex offenders (e.g. murder them, beat them, etc), but are usually far softer on female sex offenders. But b…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 08:37 PM
3

Something that often gets brought up in the west, "women get stoned for being raped in the middle east and Afghanistan", "women get lashes for cheating in the middle east and Afghanistan". They leave out that this would also be similar for men too if they cheated, were sex offenders, etc.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:10 PM
11

Saw this on YouTube. Saw tons of comments saying "lucky boy", "those boys high fived each other", "they bragged", "where was she when I was their age", etc.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:06 PM
1

I asked grok, chatgpt and claude, they all say google ai overstates how effective women in leadership roles are and google ai relies on shaky data which shaky methodology.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 05:04 PM
1

Grok: The image is a screenshot of an X (formerly Twitter) post replying to a thread. The original post is from the account "Srblje Chronicles" (with a profile picture of a simple drawn figure waving), titled "research disagrees with you" in large bold text. It includes an embedded screenshot of a mobile chat with an AI Overview (likely from a search engine like Google or similar, featuring colorful AI icons and a +9 indicator). The AI response reads: "Yes, research consistently shows that compa…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:56 PM
1

Well, this person used Google AI for their evidence. I asked Grok, chatgpt and claude to analyze the image. The td;tr is that Google AI overstates how effective and beneficial women in leadership roles are. Before anyone says I primed the AIs for the answers I wanted e.g. "grok/chatgpt/claude, debunk google ai", I didn't. I simply asked them to analyze the image. Claude: I can analyze the claims made in this AI Overview about gender diversity in leadership. Let me search for current research on …
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:56 PM
1

I think a reason why men contest child custody is because they have a chance of winning. The ones that don't are advised not to, which leads to a higher percentage of men winning custody (joint or full) when they contest it.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:31 PM
5

Supposedly, Jessica Taylor, British feminist psychologist, said a few years back when she released her book titled something like "how women are blamed for everything" she received targeted harassment by thousands of people and her computer was hacked. But I'd take what she says with a grain of salt as she's lied or misrepresented things herself e.g. she said 0% of rapists in history were women and girls and she used the UK's very biased definition of rape of what she means by rape. Plus, she's …
/r/MensRights01/01/26 07:02 PM
3

It's not rare, I'm just using their logic.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 09:34 PM
8

I remember seeing this and it was mocked by certain groups. Whenever ads, posters, or videos flip the usual script by showing female predators instead of male ones, rad-feminists immediately come out saying, “Why do they keep doing this? They keep making ads about something that rarely happens.” But that is pure selection bias. Even if the vast majority of predators are male (statistically), that reality is already reflected in the fact that most ads and campaigns portray predators as male. On t…
/r/MensRights27/08/25 04:06 PM
1

I have noticed over the last few years, in the US and UK, liberals are generally trying to appeal more to men, particularly young men, and address a few men's issues. However, as others have pointed out, it's more than likely all for show. Democrats realized they lost the young male vote, so they're trying to appeal to them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/25 07:23 PM
8

We need to understand why these men want to be cut. In a society where it's preferred and idealized to be circumcised, there will be men who aren’t circumcised who regret not being circumcised, because that's what their culture prefers. I bet in countries where circumcision isn't really a thing, you won't really see men regretting not being circumcised. Also, to play their game, we could say the patriarchy brainwashed men into thinking it's preferable to want to be circumcised.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:19 PM
1

It depends which feminists you mean. Many criticize the idea that ‘women mature earlier’ because it’s often used in creepy or predatory ways toward girls, or to push extra responsibility onto them. At the same time, girls and women are put in contradictory boxes, they’re infantilized in some scenarios but told they’re ‘mature for their age’ in others, whichever serves the agenda. Some feminists also point out that plushies, dolls, and similar things are more socially acceptable for girls because…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:38 PM
2

I bet you're feeling the "fathers praised for doing the bare minimum" so many feminists say, aren't you?
/r/MensRights12/08/25 05:08 PM
2

Between 1999 and 2010, while the news and popular culture talked about to catch a predator The news and popular culture also had 18 birthday counters for female celebs, which was met with little backlash. It was in media outlets, websites, etc, particularly during the 90s and early 2000s + the Girls Gone Wild! craze. We also had r/ jail bait, sexualization of Angie Verona, who was the most searched teen on the internet. But the 2000s also had middle aged women wooing and cheering 16/17 year old …
/r/MensRights12/08/25 04:31 PM
1

How do you feel now, 3 years on, where the term "mommy" has become even more sexualized and accepted in internet culture. We have muscle mommy, goth mommy, etc. Not much shaming going on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 11:09 PM
1

She also mentioned that reading is experiencing a gender flight, but she argues this is because men don't like to do things that women do or that are "feminine-coded". That's partially true, but I think she is missing the bigger picture which is that books are not written to appeal to men anymore. They're written to appeal to women. And men largely don't enjoy these porn-for-women books. I think that's a much stronger reason why men are not reading as much. Something that so many people miss, wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 07:14 PM
5

To further mention about the personal victimhood aspect, I've come across different feminist groups with different beliefs about beauty standards for women. One group claims women's beauty standards are rooted in pedophillia e.g. hairlessness, docile, youthful, virgin. Another group claims women's beauty standards is to have oversized breasts, butt, extremely tiny waist and wide hips. Representing a sex-doll. When you look at the members of these groups, many of them are insecure, consume media …
/r/MensRights10/08/25 02:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter