TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mgm-survivor Archive

View 1 post and 457 comments by mgm-survivor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

Intactivismmgm-survivor/r/MensRights25/12/17 06:15 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Funny story, I did that and was still accused of stewing in “pain and hatred”, so society needs to figure out how to not sabotage the lives of people who are barely holding on after being outspoken regarding the harms they suffered. But jews still seem to think they can ruin lives of people who’s lives they already ruined.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 08:41 PM
1

And for some people, taking that responsibility for one’s present and future means taking up suicide.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 08:37 PM
2

Positive happy life is not possible for everybody. This is an insanely naive perspective. Imagine saying that to the boy who chose to die after suffering horrific acid burns from his girlfriend. For victims of MGM to the extent in this dialog, imagine feeling intense thirst or starvation every day until you die. Suicide is a reasonable choice for people who are stuck in such a state.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 08:32 PM
1

What makes you think that? She associated the subject with trauma with negativity. She realized it wasn’t okay what she was doing.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 06:25 AM
1

It’s also completely fake.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:11 PM
3

Let me give you the run down. The penis is composed of the left and right vestibules and corpus cavernosum which exist in the female anatomy. A typical male circumcision is cutting right across the middle of the vagina and removing all of the flesh up to the clitoral hood. So, “circumcision” is universally worse than what happens to the vast majority of victims of FGM. As a male, I suffered far worse than most women who are victims of FGM as well. Read some post history, if you want.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:02 PM
4

Can you find me a single feminist organization fighting to end male genital mutilation? I promise you that issue is a more serious matter than sexual harassment at work. The fact that they would expect me to support them for anything until they the literal butchering of a baby’s penis is illegal, is pretty laughable.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 01:57 PM
7

Wow. Not only is this a sick fucking way to live your life, but your bullying personality and attitude just enshrined that nobody is every going to listen to you, and I am personally going to go out of my way to affront every single one of your disgusting perspectives you present here, as a demonstration of how sick you are mentally to believe and behave as such.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 09:03 PM
4

Way to cope. I restored mine and the difference is night and day. Stop lying! You want to rationalize your decision so badly that you’ve lied to yourself to the point you actually believe it. Brainwashed 101. Nobody prefers it, not one person who is not a sadistic psychopath wants somebody to hack of the most valuable part off their genitals. That’s some Jeffery Dahmer shit. Frankenpenis is not good for anybody and existentially disturbing scars, images of blood, surgery and amputation it’s the …
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:55 PM
6

The nature of the injury is liken unto one where the person is subject to permanent starvation. Reproduction is a biological imperative, so the comparisons of a genital injury to others is not so valid.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 11:08 AM
9

Meatal Stenosis, google it.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:32 PM
10

They committed sexual assault and rape, to use the proper vernacular. Or more, the doctor did - and they were accomplice and coconspirators. Look up Meatal Stenosis, you literally need your foreskin to avoid pissing in pain.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:31 PM
14

You do, in fact, need the foreskin. Without mine, I pissed in pain for 20 years - not unlike the effects of missing your eyelid.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:08 PM
1

I’m not worth being with.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:04 AM
22

You forgot about the pedophilia.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:24 AM
15

Sued? Where is the prison time for this criminal offense?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:09 PM
6

Unless the technique involves traumatic brain injury to the giver, that has nothing to do with it. Source: Cut men masturbate like humming birds.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:14 PM
1

Equal pay is way down on the list next to normalized rape of infant boys with knives.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:31 AM
7

The equivalent cut to a female would remove half of the flesh from the vagina, cutting from approximately midway between the cervix and the urethra up to the clitoris. Since the glans in women is internal, the frenulum is what most women think of as their clitoris, so many men are without that as well. It’s entirely comparable and often worse. Most circumcision scars would literally land right smack in the middle of the vagina. Find the corpus cavernosum and the left and right vestibules in the …
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:36 PM
10

You don’t represent the general public or even have a grasp over what they think. Way to invalidate boys who suffer from subincision because some broad got a nick to her cunt.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:56 PM
4

You are both discrediting both by attaching gender to it.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:53 PM
8

I just reread it, and it certainly sounds like you are defending something fathoms worse than rape. Go ahead, tell me that the man who diddled me is worse than the man who hacked off a good portion of my healthy genitals with a knife.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:47 PM
6

It is though. It’s malicious to want your children to look like you. For doctors, the medical history of the procedure is explicitly to repress male sexuality. Doctors who know how to do the procedure know it’s history. Both are therefore malicious.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:23 PM
8

Side effect, it also makes men unable to be sexually satisfied. Hmm why are men shooting up schools now, not getting married, and spreading more STDs? Maybe because everything tastes like celery as a result and they are literally experiencing starvation thanks to circumcision. Don’t forget that reproduction is a biological necessity no less important to life than eating and drinking.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:18 PM
7

Way to invalidate Aboriginal boys who are victims of subincision because some broad had a nick in her cunt. Talk about sexism! Imagine if you held to the same classifications about rape, “male rape isn’t as bad as female rape”
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:13 PM
9

Can you say that again to somebody who refused to testify against the man who raped him as an 8 year old because he was more damaged emotionally, psychologically and physically by the man who mutilated him. The man called it a “circumcision”, and it definitely was mutilation. Whenever you are ready.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:10 PM
6

Says who? The most sensitive parts of the clit are the parts removed with the foreskin.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:07 PM
12

Morally superior? If you mutilate your children, you are quite literally a child rapists with knives. Literally, not being a sick violent pedophilic criminal is morally superior.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:06 PM
6

Both of you are sexist in that there are multiple forms of MGM too. In fact the gender is as relevant to the discussion as the victim’s favorite brand of carbonated beverage. Both of you: Pepsi drinkers who were mutilated have it so much worse than Mountain Dew drinkers who were mutilated! Just stop it. Both of you. Aboriginal boys with subincisions don’t need to be invalidated in what happened to them because some woman thinks having a vagina with a nick it it makes her a bigger victim, because…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 11:59 AM
1

The traditional male circumcision is cutting off the external clitoris (frenulum), all of the exposed flesh from between the opening of the cervix to the urethra and sewing it shut.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 06:07 PM
5

Oh, it’s already in sadistic horror territory.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 06:01 PM
2

You are welcome! However it is inevitable.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 04:13 PM
2

Nobody is fooling anyone. Don’t fool yourself into believing you are going to successfully counter somebody who lives it every day.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 03:56 PM
2

It has been rooted out very very directly to be caused by circumcision. I have spoken to many “shrinks” and that is the root of the issue that needs to be addressed and resolved. This is the result of many years of professional treatment.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:16 AM
2

What do you know. I know more about emotional suppression then the average human being. I will warn you that suppression of powerful emotions, such as anger is very dangerous. It occurs to me that suppression is synonymous with your use of “letting anger go”, as the only way to let anger go without suppression is to come to a resolution. In my case, that would be something like, murdering the guy who cut me, ensuring that no human being is allowed to suffer as I have, and finally reversing the h…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:15 AM
2

So the issue is your opinion on what is constructive then. I might use my anger to build a house, but that would not be constructive since it does nothing to resolve the issue at the root of the anger. To your edit: “it’s using you” To what end and what consciousness can anger use anybody? It is not capable of intent. What is your suggestion as a constructive use of my anger that furthers resolution of the issue?
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:10 AM
2

It’s caused me to post my interpretation of your personal advice that is directly in application to oneself. I only have one oneself, so in reality this is just me performing the act of listening. Whatever else you think I am doing, you are wrong.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:07 AM
2

And would you say my circumstances and identity is an application of “carrying hate from the incident” or “using the anger constructively to become someone better” I feel like the latter is prerequisites on the prior. One cannot become better if they abandon the anger that is necessary for them to become better. Condemning, addressing and confronting child rapists with knives is me being a better person. Right?
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:04 AM
2

Are you suggesting that the OP chooses to believe he is uncircumcised? If not, what does this even mean then? I am informing you, not of anything related to OP, but of the result of me applying your advice. How did I do? In context, a "victim" is someone who has something done to them. "Victimhood" internalizes this process and seeks out reasons to be "Deeply Offended". I don’t think dictionaries will agree with you here, but I accept this is how you are utilizing the words. Can you help me unde…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:01 AM
2

I am also trying to make sense of a time where what one can control has every historically or presently been used as part of a person’s identity. Eg. “I am the King of England” gets me somewhere, I think. But generally one’s identity is composed entirely of things they didn’t choose. Again, just trying to understand you.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:53 AM
2

Context: Your mind defines who you are, not what's been done to you. My mind defines me as uncircumcised. I am proposing it as a contest to understand how that factors into your worldview. Down that path lay "victimhood". Which is fine. Failure to acknowledge that you are a victim after being subjected to Jeffery-Dahmer-esk surgical sexual violence sounds like a delusion to me.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:45 AM
2

I chose to not have been mutilated.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:06 AM
3

There is no difference. It only takes one or two pages back on my comment history for the demonstration of that fact. The law criminalizing sexual battery does not in any clause discriminate on the basis of the victim’s gender. Equivocation is not necessary, since FGM is not illegal - sexual assault and battery is.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:03 AM
3

It literally is against the law... According to both the law and the statement by the Supreme Court Justice.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:50 AM
1

Why do they do that? I am curious.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:39 PM
2

The judge explicitly told the council to prosecute under state laws of sexual battery and assault. This recommendation explicitly authorizes the prosecution of perpetrators of male and female genital mutilation under these laws. Freedom of religion is not freedom to break the law. Circumcision legally falls under child endangerment, child sexual abuse, child sexual battery and sexual assault.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:04 PM
3

It literally did all of the above to me. It feels pretty fucking shitty. Smegma doesn’t cause cancer, circumcision does not prevent cancer. There is no such thing as dick cancer, it’s just called skin cancer.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:00 PM
1

Haha, you are an idiot. You haven’t controlled anything. It is resolved. Thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:43 PM
1

If by hero you mean that I am doing my best to aid you in progressing your mental capacities for coherent communication by showing you using your rational mind, why nobody understands you, or why they keep saying you are on the spectrum. I am one who actually can communicate with you, but I’m speaking at the level you need to achieve.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:39 PM
1

I would be elated if it were resolved, but congratulations on being a massive hypocrite and making outright hallucinations and assumptions about me! Bravo!
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:37 PM
1

Literally, that is what you did. A suggestion, if I might; instead of assuming what others mean when they say things you don't understand, ask for clarification. Please give me a scenario of how this would have played out, where I did not provide my interpretation of what you were saying, that does not also involve you repeating the same thing you previously said, exactly as you said it. eg Not: You: I am a pony. Me: What? You: I am a pony. eg Perhaps: You: I am a pony. Me: How are you like a po…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:26 PM
1

You literally just described yourself. I asked for clarification, elaborated on my interpretation. You told me not to interpret english. You are anything but rational.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:22 PM
1

What behavior are you even talking about? I am not the problem, not in the slightest. I have explained in medically accurate detail the effects of GM without regard to gender. That cannot drive anybody away who isn’t already tied up in ideological disassociation from reality, eg “Men cannot be raped”, despite them objectively being capable of being raped.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:16 PM
0

You may be right. When the words you type are literally shown back to you, reality becomes your hallucination. It must be very foggy up there.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:09 PM
0

Please cite the sentence that references me saying what you did. The previous comment contains multiple unanswered questions and statements about what I did (not you). Please answer them.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:06 PM
0

I smell a projection issue here. I have again, elaborated on how your incoherent thought has literally led you to argue that people should not assume that words mean things. How are you going to clarify if you don’t even bother to understand how you are being misinterpreted? What are you smoking?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:00 PM
1

Agree to disagree about what? I have literally cited every place where you made said points. I literally asked for clarification. Assuming is the foundation of language, I assume you mean a furry whiskered animal when you say “cat”. You have lost your mind here. Literally saying that I should not use language when I am responding to somebody.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:55 PM
1

Again, that is exactly what you said... Attempting to portray one as a bigger atrocity than another [...] will be seen as ideological [...]. It literally is a bigger atrocity, as you can see in my earlier comment to this post. You are saying that portraying reality is ideological. I don’t think you understand what you were saying. I hope this helps bridge the communication gap.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:49 PM
-1

That is exactly what you said... attempts to portray one as a bigger atrocity than another will [...] be seen as an ideological argument [...], and is easily dismissed. If, instead, the conversation centers around the idea of bodily autonomy, it [...] neatly side steps that issue.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:41 PM
0

What? Isn’t the bodily autonomy argument more ideological than the “holy crap do you know what mutilating boys actually does to them?” argument? I don’t understand this comment.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:36 PM
2

Not every reply is a confrontation...
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:03 PM
4

This is incorrect. Especially in regards to infant circumcision. Women who were circumcised also make similar claims, that they are still able to enjoy sex/etc. The reality is that MGM is regularly as bad as infibulation, complete with the sewing up of the severed skin. See my earlier comment.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 05:51 PM
6

The equivalent cut to a female would remove half of the flesh from the vagina, cutting from approximately midway between the cervix and the urethra up to the clitoris. Since the glans in women is internal, the frenulum is what most women think of as their clitoris, so many men are without that as well. It’s entirely comparable and often worse. Find the corpus cavernosum in the female anatomy, recognize it is the shaft of the penis and this horrifying reality is impossible to deny. Doctors who do…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 05:42 PM
13

What isn’t the same? Having half of the flesh stripped off of your corpus cavernosum? Women have that organ too.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:54 AM
1

Do you feel that this author proclaiming himself gay in his teen years but now he is some kind of trans-female genderqueer is just some kind of attempt to push himself into the arms of straight men? I’m just pondering myself, but it seems like the trajectory of this train. Where did the gay men who are men and like men go?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:34 AM
2

It is less weird now than it was before. I switched teams when tolerance became threatening to my life. I am a gay/bi male, but I am not okay with the muslim/jewish invasion and genital mutilation. When this opinion came to their awareness they came at me to destroy my life. The democrats have devolved into a crazed bigotry of psychological projection. My question is, are you gay?
/r/MensRights31/12/18 10:50 PM
1

Help me too!
/r/MensRights31/12/18 04:29 PM
2

Ah, thank you for the clarification.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:31 AM
1

I can tell you all about the owner of Intaction’s Keratin treatment though. I assure you I’m real.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:29 AM
1

Who is? I have never been concerned.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:28 AM
1

Mentalism is discrimination. If you think that would do anything, you are wrong.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:25 AM
1

You don’t live in Europe.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:03 PM
1

Of course you didn’t.. At 5AM on a Monday, you weren’t the only one in the thread. Don’t patronize me troll, you are done here.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:02 PM
2

Seriously, I have. Read my edit. Neither Balantis or Phimosis warrant circumcision. edit: Preputioplasty cures both. Both are behavioral complications caused by the other.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:58 AM
4

No, you are simply false. Name one. edit: blind downvote means that you couldn’t. I have had this exact conversation before with a urologist. There is a better, more effective treatment for everything. The only exceptions are necrosis (like frostbite, or tissue death), malignant cancer, and flesh eating bacteria.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:54 AM
4

I am religious. My body is a temple. My primary issue is the violation of my temple. MGM is NOT medically beneficial, or necessary in any way. Alternatives such as preputioplasty and Z-plasty resolve issues related to it entirely with less harm, less risk of complication. Medical literature has nothing to offer as far as benefits, bearing that in mind. You are full of shit.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 05:31 AM
8

There are no valid medical reasons. A preputioplasty or Z-plastic corrects any amount of phimosis caused my early scarring and forced retraction. Forced retraction treated as child abuse eliminates phimosis, and any other victims can receive a simple procedure that removes no tissue, has faster/easier healing, less pain, and doesn’t normalize mutilation.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 04:11 AM
-6

Kay. But being labeled doesn’t do anything. I mean, you are labeling them as parasites. That isn’t going to do anything either. The only thing you can do is address their issue. Is it psychological? Is there a legitimate men’s rights issue underlying it that can be formalized and popularized?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:04 PM
-21

You have a distorted perspective on the power of platforms to influence anything. They don’t. Reddit throws a temper tantrum and makes more enemies, they only appear to be effective at anything. Polarization polarizes.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 11:39 AM
7

Well, I won’t participate - I just want to see it. Thank you!
/r/MensRights27/10/18 02:13 AM
5

I wish I could have, it seems to be gone now? Anybody have links?
/r/MensRights27/10/18 02:07 AM
5

Okay, but I don’t see anything like that - neither would I condemn it. The points you brought up are legitimate criticisms - not of women - but of the oppression of men. You think it has to do with hating women, but it doesn’t. Women not all being bad is not the issue being raised by those types. The issue is that they can, and there is legitimacy to the fear. It is all side effects of Kavanaugh, MeToo, and predictable reactions. For me, I don’t see any right more important to address that genit…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:20 AM
4

concern troll much? It really isn’t, not at all.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 12:05 AM
29

❤️
/r/MensRights25/10/18 04:59 PM
5

Byeeeeeeee! Tell your mom she better buy new condoms for me cuz I hated the last brand! You know that big flabby ass of hers can pack a wallhup every time her booty cheeks clap on your nutsack...better bring the lube, don’t want any cuts on my foreskin when I stick it up her starfish. nods - /u/HyperionC132 The death rattle of bad argument.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 07:48 AM
1

As a programmer, let me tell you how easy it is to invalidate an entire subsystem, by fundamentally changing the problem. Defend your subsystem, it is already gone, thousands of lines of code, studies and efforts, unnecessary.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 07:37 AM
1

Projection. You had nothing better to say so you began ranting about me being stupid. You’re retarded
/r/MensRights22/10/18 07:34 AM
1

You being uncircumcised and not hating condoms is exactly what I said. I can’t believe some one so moronic exists.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 07:32 AM
0

I’m just making sure everybody sees your temper tantrum, so as to invalidate your entire presence in this thread. You are doing wonderfully.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 07:29 AM
2

And circumcised. Again, you keep mentioning it as if that gives you credibility. I am uncut too, yet a don’t feel like I have to mention it. You being uncircumcised and not hating condoms is exactly what. I. Just. Said. - and you called me “stupid” - that is hilarious. edit: You obviously meant to say that you are circumcised and don’t hate condoms? ah, I see you edited your post, and took with it all of your credibility.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 07:20 AM
4

Reported for personal attacks.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 07:19 AM
5

Sure. Condoms, uncut men want to wear them. mutilated men hate them. That was certainly easy to prove you wrong.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 07:02 AM
2

No you are not, the fact that you mentioned it reveals that. Everything else is discredited because of it. Reason 1: to ensure men fail to bond with their wives and children, making them perfect wage-slaves. Divorce and child-support guaranteeing their servitude. Reason 2: sexual insatiability leading to increasing the population, side effects being rape, sexual assault, violence (useful for soldiers/terrorists), pedophilia, sadomasochism.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:26 AM
3

Provide the source that uncircumcised men are more likely to contract HIV through anal sex. Don’t worry, I already know it doesn’t exist.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:24 AM
2

children are "others"
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:21 AM
2

No, it doesn't. It references Christian Thomson's system for identifying periods of time. Are you pro-oral-suction? Jesus Christ, thats nearly as bad as being pro-genital-mutilation! The only reason for crying about an identification system is if you don't understand it. I call people by their first and last names, another system. Does that bother you? Does it bother you when people use language systems, like Spanish feminine and masculine nouns? It is simply a means of communicating. Labels tha…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 08:47 PM
2

Are you still here? Haven't you had your ass handed to you enough times? Where is there any reference to either of those? What are they even?
/r/MensRights17/09/18 05:14 PM
4

No. It is literally in accordance with the definition of object rape with knives. Bigotry (intolerance to opinions other than your own), which you demonstrate with such suggestions of bans or exclusions, will only get you banned and excluded from the groups you need to have conversations, and exchange empathy with. It progresses nothing and only gives your enemies more bodies. edit: "child rape with knives" FTFY
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:46 AM
6

Again, your comments are unrelated to that which you are replying to, as well as the post you are commenting on.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:18 AM
3

Exactly, murder the gays! But really, this is not an answer to OPs question, and you probably aren't going to change the mantra of NAMBLA either, but that doesn't mean that its not child rape, and in this case with knives.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:02 AM
8

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201110/doctor-ignorance-male-anatomy-harms-boys https://med.stanford.edu/newborns/professional-education/circumcision/complications.html A few sources from reputable sites.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 04:13 PM
3

Which is your concern? The bleeding or the open wound. On an infant, the wound is left open because sutchering such a small organ would cause even more disfigurement and damage. In an adult, sutchers are an option. Infants too often die from bleeding following circumcision. It is the single most cited complication of it, mostly because it is the one that is identifiable right away, while most others can occur after, and many men never know that they are suffering, such as me not knowing that uri…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 04:03 PM
3

And they are an insane organization that had men accused of sexual assault on the investigatory panel, as well as Brian Morris who has been known to take tours to Africa to watch boys be circumcised by tribes as initiation rituals. He literally gets aroused by genital mutilation, a circumfetishist. The authority of the AAP, does not exempt the authors of the panel any more than the NY Times publishing an article gives validity to the author of the article. (Argument from Authority)
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:59 PM
8

That is not true. In order for a circumcision to be performed on an infant, the skin has to be torn away from the glans, no different than ripping off a large fingernail, and far more painful. This results in scarring and pittinh of the glans (parts of it being ripped off with the foreskin), and leaving a massive open wound that can become infected. As the child develops, he may be more well endowed than his circumcision allows for, and discovers that the tight skin causes him painful urination …
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:56 PM
4

My niece nearly died from an allergic reaction to a vaccine. I am pro-vaccine, but I would be stupid to categorically dismiss anti-vax arguments because they are demonized. Instead I demand regulations to test for allergic reactions before any vaccine is administered. It should only take one allergic reaction or one infant dying from infection, or one male having complications for you to second guess and fall back to the default until remediation is made. There is presently no remediation that i…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:48 PM
7

I can assure you, cutting the most sensitive part of his genitals off, leaving him to bleed from an open wound into a urine and feces saturated diaper is not what is best for anyone.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:41 PM
4

No organization believe that it is medically necessary. Any expert saying that it is would be absolutely insane as though all or Europe is dying because they did not have this procedure. You may need more than deceptive lying to change minds in such case. I have had a medical expert point blank tell me that "medicine is not a science" - so you want to weigh that against observable global evidence (europeans not dying/rape being endemic to cutting cultures/etc)?
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:36 PM
1

I did, and I believe imgur must have made it jpg. Zooming lets you kind of read it, but only if you guess what the words are.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:37 PM
2

Way too much JPEG, Can't read.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:24 PM
1

Tbh, the commandment to mutilate every baby dick is far more fucked up than blinding every third child. Hence how something is clearly distorted and twisted in your brain. Your reply here further demonstates my point elsewhere that you are unable to respond to a comment with relevance. Your comments are liken unto asking a crazy person of they would like a sandwich, and having them respond with some comment on the grittiness of sand. Seek a mental health professional.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 11:56 AM
1

Serious as a heart attack. Why are you responding, not replying. That is not how conversations work, speaking of unhinged. Your pattern of responding with abrupt and unrelated comments is a legitimate sign of distorted thinking, and schizophrenia. You may have serious issues. Notice how my responses have relevance to yours, while yours do not have any relevance to mine. That is healthy psychology contrasted with whatever is wrong with you.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 11:41 AM
1

I doubt much to you sounds okay, considering your position on child rape with knives being acceptable. Your daily life must be constantly shook up every time you see decent human behavior.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:31 AM
2

FYI: That is why Abraham's prophecy did not come to pass. He is a patently false prophet under Elijah's criteria because he not only violated the commandment not to kill, but failed in his worthiness to God by his willingness to murder Isaac and mutilating his children. The curse is the pandemic rape and sexual assaults committed by the mutilated, en masse.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:52 AM
2

Is genocide yours? If God commands you to commit genocide, then you do it? (The answer is no, you don't, even if God tells you to. That is the test God gave you - sorry I have to spell out your own religion to you)
/r/MensRights13/09/18 10:59 PM
14

It should not be a consideration at all. Do not retract, do not let anybody else retract. Clean like a finger. The most sensitive part of his body is not yours to assault.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 09:34 PM
1

Nobody believes the media, and the law is nonsense. Ask the lawyer who dragged my child molestation case on, taking maximum fees until the perpetrator had no assets to compensate the victims. I had to pay out of my own pocket in order to do court ordered therapy for the investigators of the case, for god's sake. Lastly, the 14th amendment double standard and the indesputable constitutional violation. I come out cleaner than a gay boys ass. At best, you and/or the media come out looking like a ch…
/r/MensRights12/09/18 07:55 PM
1

And what does he have to gain?
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:24 PM
2

Again, you use both the words "bigot" and "racist" incorrectly here.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:31 PM
1

Anarchist
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:45 PM
2

Its literally what we are talking about. And no. No non-life saving surgery on babies, and the government can enforce that. It does not dictate it.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:43 PM
2

/rolls eyes.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:14 PM
2

You say "stripping parents of rights" as though you believe that they had any right to begin with. They never did and do not now. For you it seems, the last bastion of slavery is parents owning children as property. And you will somehow equate ending this slavery as totalitarianism. Your argument defeats itself.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:15 AM
3

Parents do not and never had the right to perform surgeries on their children without life-threatening cause or consent. Parents do not and never had the right to sexually abuse their children. Parents do not and never had the right to kill their children. Parents do not and never had the right to expose their children to dangerous drugs. Parents do not and never had the right to isolate them from an education. Parents do not and never had the right to abduct children from the public eye and pub…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:10 AM
2

I must say that this is a great analogy, since the argument for allowing parents to medically circumcise is based on the assumption that "parents have the child's best interests in mind", and so does the meth-head parent.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:51 AM
6

I support regulation and criminalization. I have already given one justification "making meth is rightfully criminal". "unnecessary surgery (especially genital surgery, holy fuck)" also criminal, including tattooing, scarring, piercing children before that is raised. These are my justifications. You can call it a Totalitarian regime if you want, and I will still happily support it, since Totalitarianism is not my issue. My issue is basic human rights which treat children as humans, not slaves or…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:35 AM
10

Congratulations then, because it will reside only in your head how you outmatched anything, by addressing nothing and convincing nobody. "Strawman to the death" is your mantra! I feel like you have a bunch of communist terms queued up, but nothing that explains how the government should be prevented from telling me how to (regulation) or if I can (criminalization) cook meth to feed my children. Are you an Anarchist?
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:58 AM
6

Are we talking about the genocide of the Canaanites? Communism (public ownership of the means of production) has nothing to do with a state that is submissive to "the parent" in all matters of everything (eg does not have any authority at all) After all, who is the government to tell me that I am not allowed to make meth in my basement, in order to make drug-money to feed my drug-babies? I am the parent here! /s
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:49 AM
10

How so? The big evil government is acting as the parent here too! How dare they tell these parents how to parent! How dare it require basic secular education to its citizens. How dare it subject children to "sexual education" as part of it. You may be several millions of miles in the wrong direction, but you aren't far from realizing that you made a wrong turn.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:41 AM
12

Being out the venomous snakes. The Snake Handlers of Kentucky will be happy to hear that you support their right to put babies and children in pens with vipers. "Faith, Prophecy and Obedience" (https://www.christianpost.com/news/snake-handling-christians-faith-prophecy-and-obedience-75985/) Boy those keywords are familiar. But the government is the real enemy, with their disgusting human decency, freedom of personal agency, and willingness to take on child abuse! /s
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:36 AM
2

You were also given the command to commit genocide of the Canaanites, which is the same culture from which Judaism sprung. That concerns me greatly, if you are in my culture and believe that a subculture is accepting of genocide against another, especially specifically us.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:17 AM
7

I believe you are projecting. Your post is literally cowardice, wanting to be exclusionary towards folks because of their willingness to take on what you are afraid to. I have determined you are not a genuinely concerned citizen and that your posts are purely satirical, trolling or otherwise intentionally subversive.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:27 PM
15

While this is a clear demonstration of concern trolling, let me start by explaining what the word "Bigotry" means. It is defined as "intolerance to opinions or beliefs different than your own" - clearly, given that definition, you bite your own ass. I forgive you for this, as it is semantic. To address your points, I will begin by discrediting your "antisemitism" argument. Under your criteria, the woman who beat her child with wire hangers, arguing in court that it was religious freedom, quoting…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:58 PM
1

Statement 1 and statement 2 both reaffirm what I have already said. Christ cannot save you, if you were mutilated. You cannot be a Christian and also circumcised. This is over.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:55 PM
1

This is stupid, you can't read. You can't take verse 6 out of context of 2-5 and then accuse me of doing it. He states clearly that you can not be saved AT ALL if you are circumcised, but through Mosaic law and acts. You are not eligible for his salvation, AT ALL.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:45 PM
1

Not in the slightest. You can ONLY be saved through acts, if you happen to be circumcised. Read it, it is plain as day. You can not be saved by faith or by grace. Jesus may as well not exist for you
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:09 PM
1

Galatians 5:4 Galatians 5:4 “Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.” Literally Fallen from Grace - Don't pick and choose, hr means what he means and he said what he meant.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:05 PM
1

Faith, and following OT law, Kosher law, animal sacrifice, etc - unless you are uncircumcised. EG, he is of no value - you have to follow jewish law - or be jewish. Not christian, I was correct. His salvation by his grace is of no value.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:47 PM
1

You mean when the owner does, because if a doctor (or anyone else) does then it is rape and medical malpractice. It is not supposed to be. It is fused together like a fingernail and releases as part of puberty. You can not consider farting to be air escaping your ass, it does not change that is exactly what it is.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:15 AM
2

Wrong. I already answered this. And yes it is, and you were by legal definition and I was by legal definition and my personal experience, subject to the emotional and psychological ramifications of said rape with a knife
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:44 AM
1

Its called a probe. It is made of stainless steel and its purpose is also its name. That isn't even a complete thought, "having my adhesions" - what? "ripped off by a metal object penetrating into your genitals" (that is what you meant to say? Not the knife literally penetrating into the flesh of your body My god, yes - you are. Its rape, by definition. Get over it.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:41 AM
2

Your feelings in no way invalidate the reality that I WAS raped. So go fuck yourself you monstrous half-prick.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:28 AM
2

Sorry buddy, but you were. I repeat my previous edit: Let it be known that the first two steps of circumcision involve arousing the infant, followed by probing it with a stainless steel tool to "remove adhesions" (which really means tearing the skin, fused like a fingernail and ripping apart the frenulum which is the nervous system equivalent to the external clitoris or as deuterostome animals that we are, the tongue) Following that, the deuterostome equivalent to the infants lips are pulled awa…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:20 AM
2

The California crime of “forcible penetration with a foreign object” (also known as “forcible sexual penetration” or “sexual penetration by force or fear”) is described in California Penal Code 289 PC.1 The legal definition is: Committing an act of sexual penetration with another person, Where that penetration is accomplished using a foreign or unknown object, Without the other person's consent, Through the use of force, violence, duress, menace, fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury, or …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:11 AM
7

And a rich person doesn't have any problem being poor. Who is talking about you? Exactly no-one. By the definition of the words, it is literally object rape with a knife. Unless you control dictionaries, then that is a hard, written fact, by the semantics alone. The dictionary says you were raped, it does not dictate how badly, or whether or not you were okay with it.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:02 AM
8

And I refused to testify against the 40 year old man that raped me when I was 8, forced to stay silent at risk of being shot by him (a professional big game hunter) until I could testify against the child rapist that mutilated my genitals. You aren't the only person in the world. I have had as many problems as women in Africa who were mutilated, including anorgasmia, painful urination (leading me to attempt suicide once and forcing me to fracture an alter to survive), massive psychological damag…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:35 AM
2

Beards are for prostates and foreskins tho. Where do I get that shirt?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:33 AM
1

Nonsense. There is identifiable biological cues of such transformations observable from rats to sociological studies. The middle east invented the numerical system before Muslims and circumcision sent then spiraling into the stone age.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:25 AM
1

The entire vagina protects the internal organs of the vagina, from the relative function on the body. Both are there to protect the internal organs. You are incorrect, blatantly so - and never in any circumstance will you be correct by ignoring the identical organs in comparative anatomy, such as the corpus cavernosum and the left and right vestibules which form the shaft of the penis, not the shaft of the clitoris which is so nonsensical, you should feel ashamed and embarrassed insinuating that…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:53 AM
1

The shaft skin is equivalent to all of the skin of the vagina. You need to be corrected, and so does whatever frivolous biology textbook you are claiming to cite. The Raphe line is literally what would have been the opening of the vagina. Removal of the clitoris is identical to removal of the frenulum. I don't know what kind of circumcision you have seen, but medical male circumcision in the US removes half of all of the shaft skin from the penis, right up to the scrotum. This is equivalent to c…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:26 AM
14

Galations 5:2 says that if you are circumcised, Jesus grace is of no value to you, implying you cannot be free of original sin by grace.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:23 AM
12

No, because anybody can claim religious exemptions. They just start a statement with, "I believe..." and thats supposed to be enough to justify raping boys with knives.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:21 AM
0

Incorrect. The left and right vestibules and the corpus cavernosum exist in the left and right walls of the vagina. The penis and the clitoris are not the same. The shaft of the penis forms from the entire vagina, fusing together to extend the urethra. The majority of what is the male glans is internal, and what is recognized as the clitoris is actually the male frenulum (often removed by circumcision, making FGM and MGM comparable severity). The glans is mainly sensitive to pain, where the same…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:51 AM
19

My brother who contracted a superbug staph infection that nearly killed him from his circumcision had falsified records. Its not surprising at all. Doctors will do anything to avoid having higher malpractice insurance rates, or having an unnecessary sexually abusive non-consentual surgery nearly killing someone. The doctors tried to blame it on the tools used for cutting his umbilical cord, apparently oblivious to the fact that staph requires an open wound or access to the blood supply to infect…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:57 PM
12

You are wrong, but supposing you were right - then why would you subject a child to pain, pissing through an open wound sitting in a bag alongside feces if it did nothing? Just don't, and leave it the fuck alone, no retraction - clean like a finger.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:07 PM
12

Its... it is not the same. Not in the slightest. 1/10 men experience painful urination because of it. 100% of men experience difficulty having an actual orgasm (experienced just like women experience it) and there is a significantly higher risk of erectile dysfunction, skin bridges, infections (esp superbugs, and staph because, hospitals). Sociologically, cutting cultures are more prone to sexual violence, pedophilia, and rape. No..... just no.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:03 PM
31

Were you forcibly retracted - because if you couldn't have peed, you'd have died in the womb. You realize a fetus urinates, right? If you were forcibly retracted, leading to scar tissue and blockage, then they literally caused you to nearly lose them by tearing your foreskin back, complete with blood and scarring at some point after you were born. Sorry, but this is not any reason for circumcision - but more reason to leave baby dicks the fuck alone. edit: source
/r/MensRights03/09/18 10:56 PM
31

Hope for what?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:08 PM
3

They sure are desperate, aren't they...
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:47 PM
4

Not having seen it, nor having any interest - it could be interpreted as a passive aggressive protest of it, depending on the context of the scene. If that was the dialog, and it wasn't framed as a way to invoke humor from raping a child with a knife, then I would think that, otherwise I hope she dies horribly in a fire.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 11:57 PM
4

From an perspective of somebody who sees the world accurately, in relation to symbolic castration and widespread violent child sexual abuse - these issues are so incredibly petty in comparison.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:40 PM
1

I would agree. I would add that raping babies with knives is a bigger issue than climate change, the middle east, terrorism, and police brutality. I would additionally argue that it is the cause of "toxic masculinity", terrorism and domestic/sexual violence/rape (strikingly more common in mutilating cultures), fatherless families, crime. And many other social ills. Removing the male capacity to feel as though they are satiated, that they successfully reproduced (and thus bonded to their wives/ch…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:30 PM
1

But apparently not gay/bi ones (like myself). I don't find advice from hypocrites all that genuine. He needs to have a faggot like me kick his ass.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:17 AM
1

stopped watching at "faggot" - this guy is a piece of shit because he is one.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:21 AM
1

If a weapon is involved BINGO (Knives are weapons), and infants cannot consent to be raped, neither can their parents consent for them. Find me a majority uncircumcised muslim sect or country, or else I am.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:48 PM
1

No. There is not, try this framing, "I advise you to be raped by my knife" vs "I am going to rape you with my knife". Try wikipedia, it is exactly to do with it. The pedophile who raped me did not tell me he was going to kill me if I said anything, he simply strongly advised me not to while holding a gun. He is still not nearly as evil as these child rapists with knives.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:07 PM
1

I believe the Muslim's recently celebrated a holiday celebrating Abraham's mutilation of children, no? What was it called when it was unceremoniously forced into my awareness... Eid al-Adha, right? The MUSLIM CELEBRATION of CHILD RAPE WITH KNIVES.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:53 PM
1

Yet if such sin were widespread and it tolerated it, it becomes such. It is illegal to fail to report child abuse. It is a sin to feed murderers by the products of their victims labor, to aid and abet monsters.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:17 PM
1

I am far beyond feel better petitions.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:46 PM
1

I do not care. If it does not condemn it while inheriting from it, then it is evil. Nice throwaway. edit: clarity
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:40 PM
5

Genital Mutilation of Males.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:28 AM
5

Sexual dysfunction is declaratively more common among cutting cultures. Meatal Stenosis (sexual dysfunction) is scientifically documented to effect almost exclusively mutilated men and boys. Sexual dysfunction in men is more common than it is apparent due to culture and the ability of men to ejaculate despite orgasm, which many men have NEVER actually experienced. Those cultures overall are documented with higher rates and correlations to greater sexual violence, domestic violence, pedophilia, e…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 02:18 AM
2

The irony in it is that it doesn't remove any desire, just the capacity to fulfill it - so the end result is more sexually frustrated, violent, literally starving men who may end up in a viscous cycle where they are never satisfied in a relationship and are forever in search of something that might finally satisfy their built-in need for genetic survival, often in the vein of greater perversions, sadism, rape, violence, etc. You look at the world, and thats where those issues are most prominent,…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:48 AM
3

Wah! My Vagina, Wah!
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:52 AM
3

I believe it is an edit of the article where all references to circumcision are replaced with FGM and the photo is swapped.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 03:38 AM
8

Society is fucked, its over guys. It was fun while it lasted.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:08 AM
1

I can't wait for you to make the argument that mutilating black girls is okay, but mutilating white girls isn't because mutilating black girls has different effects due to their different cultures, ignoring entirely their identical, observable real-life equivalency on account of psychobabble. edit: As soon as you try to step out of the literal in your excuses, this is where you end up - and its nothing but a world where personal bias, stereotypes, sexism, racism m, prejudice and generalization r…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:31 PM
2

It's all bad, don't be alarmed.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:03 AM
1

Are you dying? The world will end and where will your medications be then?
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:07 PM
1

Wow, go to rehab.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:40 PM
18

Child Rapist wielding knives, still at large.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:37 PM
1

Are you projecting? If I cut the fingers off pianist prodigy, it will have different effects as cutting off the feet of a dancer. Arguing effects is as stupid an argument as you could make! You literally have to have the ability to predict the future of every single freaking child. It forces you to generalize and you take the sexist bait hook line and sinker, because that is exactly what you are!!! Your world must be a big mess of black and white fuzzy groups and categories, because damn it if y…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:31 PM
1

You are right, cutting off my lips and cutting off yours are completely different because I'm a better kisser than you... Density runs in your family?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:04 PM
1

Its easily credibly disputed by simply identifying the analogous organs that are the corpus cavernous and left and right vestibules. It is by pure sexism, male stereotypes of them being incompetent and unhygienic and certain religions that this gaping maw of double standards is allowed to persist. Male circumcision has been identified by intellects as great as Christopher Hitchens and FGM victims themselves, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali as commonly worse. What is not credible is your statements that it …
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:32 PM
1

Who knew that, even as a male - I have suffered almost all of these as a result of circumcision. Remind me why I am not eligible for protection from the same exact symptoms on account of my chromosomes?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 12:29 PM
1

To be fair, an equivalent cut on a female removes all the flesh midway between the opening of the cervix and urethra up to and including the clitoral hood. Comparing sewn up to entirely hacked off. Locate the left and right vestibules and corpus cavernous in male and female bodies and recognize your own psychosis of cognitive dissonance and sexism.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 12:25 PM
5

I can't tell you how many people use their kids as an excuse for not showing up on time, poor performance. And of course, it is everybody else's problem that they aren't making you successful, despite tardiness and disinterest.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:43 AM
1

see edit. It was once "outer" mucosa temporarily, but for me its inner again. Lo entiendes?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 10:16 PM
1

I still have plenty. Everything between the scar and the glans...
/r/MensRights22/07/18 10:12 PM
1

I specified the "health of", words - gosh darn it, they are tricky.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 11:27 AM
2

It cures painful urination/Meatal Stenosis, prevents irritation and needing to adjust yourself and reverses keratinization and health of the inner mucosa and glans. People who have restored feel healthier, and describe their previous state as clearly broken.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:24 PM
3

Venomous snake bites have similar death rate statistics as circumcision. So, lets put our children in pens with venomous snakes? If that doesn't make sense, than neither does your garbage.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:10 PM
6

Stop raping infants and children with knives, and take your own advice. Yours is the only one you get to make amputative choices for.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:06 PM
11

It could happen. The popular opinion is already in favor of a ban. Adding FGM makes it that much more pressing. The lobby is weaker than its ever been, and its getting worse for them (Hollywood, etc).
/r/MensRights21/07/18 08:18 AM
14

And it will be off the books in 2018 because boys weren't. It will be declared unconstitutional. The lawyers in the defense of the FGM trial are using it as a defense. FGM will soon be legal thanks to it's sexism. edit: pft, er. Where does the time go!
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:59 AM
20

Its unconstitutional, so the statute will be tossed out, unless it accommodates equal protection under the law, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 04:44 AM
3

is this real? Did they really say "peer pressure" was a motive?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:14 AM
2

That is nonsensical. It is not a leap, its the sane conclusion. The most comparable persona relates to circumcision proponents is liken unto Jeffery Dahmer. No sane human being hacks up the genitals of children. It is by pure bias that the objective observation eludes you. Sensorily, due to humans being duterostomes, its essentially equivalent to carving off the lips, cheeks and portions of the tongue, claiming it is because boys are incapable of brushing their teeth (sexist stereotyping). Once …
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:43 PM
1

It is not. I was raped by a 40 year old man when I was 8 for 5 years, kept quiet by fear of being shot; he was a big game hunter. I refused to testify against him until the man on the stand be the person who performed this mutilation on my body. MGM is more horrific than that, without a doubt.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:20 PM
29

you seem to know a lot about doing that
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:00 AM
0

Significantly more as a baby than as an adult.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:39 AM
24

Wow. What the freak shit show is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 11:37 AM
3

Do you think we could use these tactics of appealing to the hearts and minds effectively to stop parents who beat their children, or more similarly liken unto the parents who put venomous snakes in pens with their children (snake handlers) believing God protects them from poison? At what point do you intervene, if not them hacking of the majority of the sensory tissue of their child's genitals, especially considering how much more horrific that is to simply being beaten?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:51 AM
6

Obviously not. Circumcision however, is child rape with knives - if you insist that it is acceptable to mutilate children, boy or girl - you should be aware that you are defending sadistic child sexual abuse. As deuterostomes, you can easily draw the comparison that circumcision is like cutting off the lips, cheeks and portions of the tongue of the child, sensorily speaking. Yes, you can still taste a little bit with a dried out dysfunctional tongue.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:25 AM
2

Sensitivity doesn't work that way. Having an index finger does not make your hand more sensitive than not having one.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:16 AM
3

It is far far far from worthless. The funny thing about it, and you can ask anyone who has gained from it, once you start it the benefits are so noteworthy that people rarely stop, despite the attention it requires.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:14 AM
9

Dude, stop defending pedophile sadists who rape babies with knives. Just stop, stop pretending you have any capacity for good when you can't recognize basic human rights to not have your genitals hacked up.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 12:57 AM
10

Disgusting. This is what mutilation brings. Self hatred, the end of civilization. It is epiphany and suicide that follows from realizing you aren't any different. You merely mutilated your temple, and your gift.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:47 PM
9

Yes, I consider it to be more horrific than child rape, which it is also (sadistic child sexual abuse). When I was pressured to testify against the man who molested me when I was 8, I demanded that I would only on the condition the man on the stand was the man that mutilated me first. I was able to heal from the psychological wounds of being molested (mostly with disassociation) but the wound on my body was torturous, and took much more emotional pain, time and effort to heal. 20 years of painfu…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 07:35 PM
2

My understanding is not that it uses a skin graft, but skin from your scrotum (presuming you have plenty to spare). The organ is sort of weaved-through a couple incisions leaving you with more mobile skin.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 07:30 PM
9

I personally refused to testify against the 40 year old man who raped me when I was 8 until the man on the stand be the person who mutilated me. You are defending child rape. I'd rather be a clown than what you are. Child rape with knives is exactly what this is, clown. Want to tell that to my brother who nearly died from a staph infection from it, or the people who are dead from suicide because of it? Stop being a god damn, mother fucking monster in a disgusting shell of a human being, defendin…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 03:30 AM
3

Its not a strawman. It is asking where you draw the line. You are obviously not okay with me punching my baby in the face to stop it from crying. But you are okay with me hacking off 2/3 of the nerves in his genitals. This is backwards, punching a baby is less harmful in the long and short term.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 03:26 AM
11

There nothing atrocious at condemning child rape with knives. It is atrocious when it occurs
/r/MensRights27/06/18 03:25 AM
10

Answer the question, or don't bother replying at all...
/r/MensRights27/06/18 03:19 AM
15

Child abuse is illegal. Child sexual abuse with knives is even more-so.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 03:18 AM
-1

This person seems disconnected from reality. I never heard of her, and its already left a narcissistic impression.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:07 AM
4

Yeah. Amputees WOULD be better off with an arm. Thats the point. I will argue, that they don't have healthy sex lives in general, because I was and I know I didn't and I know all the guys I dated didn't, and so on.... Sex is sensitive, sensual and intimate. If it is aggressive, demeaning, or psychological, thats your cue that something is broken without that bit. Anyway! Its reality, its inherently cruel, esp reality where its legal to mutilate boys.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:44 PM
1

You assume a lot, and are wrong on 2/3 of those assumptions.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:44 PM
5

Mmhm. Suuure. See, now psychologically you are "retreating". The mental equivalent to a bite-and-run. Attempting to invalidate all perspective by way of retreating on yours. They should matter, that is the reason communication brought us our of the trees. May as well not have an internet then. And you say my statements are stupid...
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:35 PM
3

You know how the human mind works, but not that you are revealingly explosively sensitive to your ego being bruised on this issue and dismissive to people who know things that you don't? I am restored too, and know what you are missing, with 100% certainty, and its absolutely horrific and explains much of the state of the world, geographically.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:30 PM
8

you are overcompensating. For what? You realize how that response comes off as revealing this as a serious threat to your ego? Do you think you might just stuck in a state of trying to defend it, when its the obviously wrong stance to literally be okay with raping infant genitals with knives for sexual manipulation or a subjective sense of sexual appeal?
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:25 PM
0

Circumcised 30y/o male here, and I have insanely low pain threshold that I know 100% for a fact is related to being cut.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:21 PM
2

Child rape so long as they are boys and with knives on their genitals is still legal... With that in mind, why are you posting this, instead of working to address that?
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:28 AM
11

1/10% of cut boys dealing with often lifelong painful urination trumps all these stats, and that is only one of the hundreds of possible complications to add to the risks, none of which exist if the child is left alone, and more importantly none can be blamed upon an agent. This attempt to pine out minuscule risks to lopping off an organ equivalent to ones lips, cheeks and portions of the tongue is simply grotesque. Do not rape children with knives.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:29 PM
12

I am cut and consider it worse than the rape I experienced at the age of 8 by a 40 year old man. Literally, if you rape children with knives you are verging on Jeffery Dahmer-esk child rape.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:27 PM
3

I personally refused to testify against the person who raped me when I was 8 because the violation of my body with this mutilation was a far far greater violation than the 40 year old could possibly have achieved less he pulled the trigger. Unlike him, the doctor who took it upon himself to hack of half of the nerves of my genitals successfully made use of his coercive weapon and in doing so became a sincerely more sadistic Jeffery Dahmer esk pedophile. Equivalently, you would be pulling the fle…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:05 PM
4

if not being okay with stoning children and owning/beating slaves so long as they don't die in a couple days makes you an anti-semite, then I suppose it does and everybody is anti-semitic. It is child rape with knives. It has been proven to have horrific complications. A 100% chance of additional risks from performing the procedure (including death, bleeding, meatal stenosis [as high as 1 out of 10]), outweigh any tiny marginal benefits somebody might have from it. It has been proven only to be …
/r/MensRights05/06/18 03:59 PM
18

Heaven help is that a ban on child rape with knives is successfully done and over with.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:22 PM
1

I disagree. The foundation is empathy. They need to absorb some.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 11:08 AM
11

This is disgusting, child rape proponents.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:52 AM
7

Step 1. Stop cutting up their genitals. Step 2. Stop enslaving them to child support.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:48 AM
2

Don't rape children with knives.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 08:58 AM
1

*Most rapists and pedophiles are genitally mutilated men FTFY
/r/MensRights02/06/18 08:40 AM
1

They are victims to being raped with knives as children. Its a very sad sad thing. 1/10 of the urinate in pain every day. Many suffer from complications that nobody knows they have.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:35 PM
6

Yeah, and they don't have the right to infringe in the rights of other men not to be raped with knives.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:25 PM
6

Child rapist with knives says what?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:21 PM
1

Much of that has to do with their proximity to genitally mutilated men permanently altered to exist in a form of sexual insatiability, and emotional immaturity, liken to forced starvation. The garment is a symptom of and a reaction to the greater cause, being mutilated men.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:40 AM
7

Does anybody know what an "informitivity rule" is in their sub? That was the one the mod said when I was banned for suggesting that maybe violence/rape/etc was likely because of the permanent state of sexual starvation in the genitally mutilated male. Can't even find a proper definition of the word, let alone a rule. I assure you, its all made up. Its not a real sub, its a corral for the less than quality beef.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:00 PM
2

They are roughly, however the shaft is equivalent to the left and right vestibules, only the glans and clitoris are equivalent, though much that would be the penis glans is not exposed in the female, primarily the frenulum which is the primary erogenous zone in both sexes, so removal of that organ is roughly equivalent to removal of the clitoris (given that the concern is removal of the most sensitive part, the frenulum). A typical male circumcision removes half of the skin from the shaft, thus …
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:03 AM
6

They are, as I explained. Feel free to attempt to explain how it is not so, given the existence of equivalent structures in both that demonstrate it. Men and women both have corpus cavernousum, and a penis is NOT a clitoris, but the entire vagina closed in the front to extend the urethra. Lets stop this misinformation, please.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:24 AM
13

Keeping in mind that the equivalent to a male cut on a female would be to remove all of the skin from midway between the cervix and the urethra up to and including the clitoral hood and external clitoris (when comparing to frenectomy). So, comparable... Comparative anatomy by locating the corpus cavernous and vestibules in the female anatomy demonstrates this.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:20 AM
1

Ending dependence on foreign oil would do a lot to help.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:05 AM
5

I am curious if she was equally disgusted, and that is why she weaseled that reality out of her, but did not express it overtly, to avoid backlash against her. I have seen Ru Paul do that too, so I hesitate to demonizer her.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 05:28 AM
9

The explanation given does not make sense. If you are compelled to also "advocate genocide" then what role does the pronoun play, why does the bill mention them at all? Is it so that it is made not a crime to advocate genocide using proper pronouns? And JP is proven to be correct when "monetary damages", "business practices", et. al. are brought up. Presumably forcing these policy changes on people inherently would include their speech! It comes off as an attempt to make the government appear se…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 01:36 AM
2

For me, it is really simple. It is legal to mutilate male children's genitals, but illegal to do the same to a woman. This is sick, sadistic pedophillic sexism against men. Literally, by some sick twisted corruption, legal to chop half of the nerves of a baby's dick. This is a disgusting society, and the fact that not every fucking mouth isn't screaming to make this a crime, and instead bitching about getting cooties in the office is a testament at the real inequality entitlement in the first wo…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:15 PM
49

Her new name is now Sandy Bollocks. She is hereby a blood-diamond faced pedophilia proponent.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:11 PM
7

There is a nerve that senses when you are full and turns off your brain's hunger. That is why Bulimia works, since you eat which stimulates the nerve, then evacuate. This leaves you no longer hungry despite no food in your stomach. Works the same with sex, which evolutionarily works exactly the same in the brain (gotta reproduce!). Those nerves missing means your brain never feels like it has been able to, thus you feel insatiably hungry... forever.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:19 AM
6

That is not how it works. You would need to remove your testicles. What you have is permanent starvation going on. Aka, you more likely than not have issues with self restraint BECAUSE of it.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:52 AM
5

The man who raped me when I was 8 did so because of this. Because he was unable to find sexual fulfillment in a family and it drove him to perversion. I told a court that this crime of violently hacking away at the genitals of men was greater than his.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:25 PM
13

Religion. The wealthiest business, that produces nothing. (sssh Its slavery)
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:13 PM
10

Some species of mice, the male population breeds themselves to literal death, ignoring their own needs for food, self, etc. It is evidentially true that male sexuality is a biological need, and when it is repressed it turns into a monster (rape/pedophilia/even terrorism), as we see time and time again. Circumcision is surgical sexual repression, masturbation repression especially, which is a threat to their control over sex. What normally programs a man to serve his wife and family can be hijack…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:35 PM
12

If anywhere a vote is allowed, they will lose. They know that, so imagine if a political party suppressed the presidential election vote because they knew they would lose. What is the difference?
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:29 PM
21

I can't agree. The vote would have easily passed, the majority in every country where it is proposed aren't plain old stupid humans in regards to this issue. The same is true wherever else a vote is attempted. The vote itself must be suppressed, men must be body shamed into silence, make them believe that women and society will ridicule them. Its clear conspiracy.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:19 PM
16

Circumcision is a way to ensure that men are unable to have sexual satisfaction. It ensures that their brains force them to do anything for sex because they are biologically incapable of being satisfied by it, like perpetual starvation. The benefits of that much mind control over the male population is their reason. Men are disposable, and this enshrines it.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:12 PM
11

You don't think the Jews will just threaten Denmark to get whatever they want (including more [economic] power)? What convinces you Denmark isn't just another smoke screen to keep you occupied with hope and thus enslaved to perpetual distraction?
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:05 PM
23

Corruption and Conspiracy
/r/MensRights13/05/18 01:25 PM
9

You could always not put a diaper on them and clean up the mess they leave behind instead.... Like you do with dogs. Its not that big of deal, she may have a point, I mean - why are we strapping feces and urine bags to babies? #onlyslightlyserious
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:50 PM
2

Boys benefit as well from lessons targeting women, but you must approach the subject from a creative side, where men are perfectly able to machinize topics. The structure of women's minds is more fluid or blurry. Just for saying that, I would be reprimanded. That is a good point, and I don't believe I could address it entirely here. I merely mean to point out that I have personally been accosted just for stating that I targeted lessons to appeal to women, because "men and women aren't different!…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:01 AM
7

Have you considered the proportion of people who blow themselves up in relation to those who are mutilated? As an extreme case. Other statistics you can correlate include rape (including child rape) and domestic violence. You remove the natural function of healthy emotional/intimate/physical relationships and wonder why they dive into the perverse. Get a clue child rape with knives apologist.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 02:37 AM
8

Props to self-realization finally happening that boys and girls CAN both work in the industry but must be educated differently as any fool who has worked in education in this field can attest.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 02:10 AM
6

You are an idiot re: removed, and I happily told a judge that this procedure was more damaging emotionally and psychologically than 5 years of child rape, because it fucking is. Do this to a child, prepare for me to identify you as a Jeffery Dahmer equivalent child rapist.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 01:33 AM
21

You defend your cause by justifying child abuse. This merely shows that you know that it is child abuse. Child abuse on the genitals with knives none-the-less. You are an inhuman monster. The irony of you defending your right to force your views onto the genitals of other individuals by crying that people are forcing their views on to you by not allowing you to do whatever you want to other people is laughable if not horrific and tragic. How is this lost on you?
/r/MensRights04/05/18 09:47 PM
21

Found the child rapist sadist who likes to fondle baby boys genitals with knives. Does it give you a chubby to rape babies and boys? Serious question
/r/MensRights04/05/18 09:01 PM
6

A moron. Restoration is a project, and these people blow themselves up at an alarming rate. Lets put this INSANE man's projection issues into perspective.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:44 PM
5

MensLib gets little to zero posts compared to MensRights. I follow them, but I literally give zero shit about these supposed women/obesity/trans rights while men can be legally genitally mutilated before they can fight back or say no. Ban that, and I'll see if I can find some wiggle-room for them.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:30 PM
5

Maybe its just the unfamiliarity to "Not sure really" which is odd word order... does it mean the same as "Not really sure mate?" or is it a "really mate?" - I did fill in "Still on for Friday night" though I didn't hear those words.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:21 AM
-1

I have a really hard time understanding the dialog. I don't think its just the accent - or is it? I have no idea what he said was his issue. "I'm so hungry" "Shiidow for friday night?" "Nosure-edeme" "Wha? Talk to me mate" Thats literally what I hear.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:16 AM
2

Very true. I have multiple personality disorder/dissociative identity disorder, and it is a disorder - I do not enjoy dealing with its effect on my life. edit: I am however grateful for it, as a child it did/does protect me from the life threatening effects of the trauma. That said, I do believe all my alters are the same age/gender/everything as me, I just don't remember things they do, like persistent sleep walking where a whole person is there instead of me. Some people in groups claim their …
/r/MensRights27/04/18 08:56 PM
0

So freaking stupid...
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:16 AM
7

Pretty sure you are full of bullshit, brigading cuz your all feeling threatened. I see very little of that, and a lot of ending male surgical child rape and women getting off scott-free or a pat on the hand after raping boys or physically attacking men (supporting and preventing male victims of rape, is pretty serious).
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:39 PM
1

Self awareness, you are a good person I see. I am subscribed to /MensLib and its mostly eye-rolling from me. I am surprised I haven't been banned from it, since I was banned from /feminism for recognizing the obvious correlation between terrorism and male genital mutilation. I recognized the causes of my being raped as a multi-faceted spectrum but the facets I registered that were "politically incorrect" left me realizing I might be a "Gay Conservative", and therefore unwelcome. All because I re…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 08:08 AM
3

Self awareness, you are a good person I see. I am subscribed to /r/MensLib and its mostly eye-rolling from me. I am surprised I haven't been banned from it, since I was banned from /r/feminism for recognizing the obvious correlation between terrorism and male genital mutilation. I recognized the causes of my being raped as a multi-faceted spectrum but the facets I registered that were "politically incorrect" left me realizing I might be a "Gay Conservative", and therefore unwelcome. All because …
/r/MensRights20/04/18 08:07 AM
3

Fair, thanks for your sanity. You seem to have expectations for what an uplifting sub should be, but I still don't see anything uplifting from you. Considering the state of myself. Uplift me, I ask. And I'll find you a place that is "more than the disfunctional state of your penis" [because stupid bitches that I am not even attracted to thought it would make my sexual organ more aesthetically pleasing].
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:54 AM
2

Tell me, man to man, what should I feel uplifted about considering I am a genitally mutilated white gay cismale in a society that literally thinks its okay to cut off half of his cock without receiving a bullet in the head?
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:40 AM
3

Maybe try /r/puppies for meaningless, feel-goods. For a double shot of reality espresso, stay subscribed. And Fuck People Who Rape Baby Boys WiTH KNIVES. Until that is illegal, I think every giving a shit about women's right to choose is bankrupt while the double standard is literally aztec style bloody alter child rape at the hands of Jeffery Dahmer perverts.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:29 AM
18

Like polygamy, and snake handling? Its cool if I put my infant in a pool of poisonous snakes, right? I promise, Jesus will protect them from painful urination, anorgasmia and suicidal thoughts, right?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 10:45 AM
20

Like saying ending slavery will end the southern colonies, or ending polygamy/wife-owning will end marriage.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:19 AM
1

There is only 5 of them and they are full of putrid vacuousness having only to do with THEIR political opinions and nothing to do with the film. Not a single fact refuted but whinging about political divides as though they aren't equally culpable, literally by their remarks, as they hypocrisize.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 07:53 PM
6

The mostly permanent daily suffering of 847K victims should dictate what the 15M others might possibly, someday, maybe, at incredible improbabilities have to go to a doctor for once or twice or as part of a routine checkup where other less first-world problems might call them to address.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:58 PM
8

therefore not all abuse to genitals constitutes sexual abuse/assault. Literally saying, you think the morality of the actions of Jeffery Dahmer is determinate on if he had a boner or not when he did it. Wow, like seriously WOW.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:09 PM
5

The health benefits of preemptively stabbing women in showers so they don't have to worry about being stabbed in car crashes are irrelevant. Re your edit: Child Rape with knives apologist says what?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:43 PM
9

Because the difference is to subject harm onto the healthy and innocent is immoral, where to treat illness is not. It is more wrong to stab a person in the chest than to fail to prevent such a stabbing occurring naturally (such as in a car crash) Do No Harm. We will not be meeting in the middle in regards to child rape with knives. An option for adults is as close to the middle as you deserve.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:32 PM
6

Yes, they are to the level of Dahmer. Its a quite plainly objective observation of what is actually happening. Doctors who are plain everyday men and women do not rape unconsenting children with knives, brutally skinning their fucking genitals. Simple! Ones that do are morally evil to at least the level of Jeffery Dahmer and greater than regarding the numbers of their victims. Nobody further was raped by that man, neither was my reasoning selfish - fighting to save the butchering of thousands ov…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:14 PM
4

I was raped by a 40 year old man when I was 8 and refused to testify until the greater villain perpetuation a more heinous violation of my body were punished first. I have known "REAL monsters" and these people are inclusive of the categorization, from the voice of one who knows the faces of evil. I would call them FAR WORSE than the mere term Rapist. I have been favoring "child rapists with knives" and "Jeffery Dahmer enthusiasts" which describe them aptly.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:57 PM
9

Meatal Stenosis is measured to effect 10-20% of all circumcised males resulting in painful urination than most (including me) do not know is abnormal until it is gone and suddenly - YEARS of suffering crash around them. Bigger fish to fry than child rape with knives, gotcha? Yeah, somewhere in the world there is somebody with bigger fish to fry than a first-world child being raped by a Jeffery Dahmer enthusiast - may as well just sit around and watch Netflix then, right? Child rape with knives i…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:54 PM
7

Curious how you think 10-20% of the male population is an extreme. Secondly, how you think a comment projecting a heinous level of narcissistic self-regard is going to effect anything? (literally defending child rapists with knives)
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:32 PM
12

So, had you pissed in pain for 20 years or had a dose of empathy towards people who had or otherwise suffered, you would consider it more forefront? Suppose you cared at all about people who suffered more than their experience being raped and refused to testify until the more heinous villain was punished? These things, because they did not happen to you bear no weight what so ever, right? That is what I get from your post as to your feelings. It does not flatter my perceptions, but you may not b…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:50 PM
3

You are speaking to one, literally right now. Held in silence at gunpoint until I literally had an identity fragmentation at 8 years old. Believe it, because I don't care if you don't. I refused to testify until I could testify against the greater villain in my life (of many - thank you perspective) and the source of significantly greater trauma. Answer me this, why are the vast majority of terrorists, sexual victimizers and mentally unstable genitally mutilated? Do not discount pervasive univer…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:07 AM
5

No. Was raped as a child for years, developed DID. Cutting me was worse. Do not give us a bad name. The scar was in fact a trigger that invoked a transition. The DID otherwise would have been an effective resolution of the trauma, but that scar haunted and tormented me until now my ENTIRE BODY is covered in scars. Not to discount the 20 years I spent with painful urination and chronic dehydration that probably ruined my kidneys. This procedure has taken DECADES off of my life, so kindly respect …
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:02 AM
0

Cutting your children's dick cuz of a book: Child Rape with knives /u/modern-scripture - how about you find a book that doesn't like child rape with knives and/or slavery? There are better books, fyi...
/r/MensRights25/03/18 12:23 AM
2

As funny as though you referred to the tools used in the decapitation of reporters by ISIS before their grieving mothers. Some things are not funny.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 12:32 AM
3

Mkay. Not funny, neither is joking about child rape with knives. Kindly stuff this where the sun don't shine.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 12:19 AM
7

Depends on the particular nomenclature or subgroup of feminism. Christina Hoff Summers refers to herself as The Factual Feminist, and is a big MRA proponent. Avenues of Feminism are rife with projection, but so is every other subculture, eg Mormon's with the highest pornography comsumption, the most pious religions being most likely to be raping children/infants (see username). Basically, if you engage in the average person lacking self-awareness (note: self awareness is often expressed as self-…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:22 AM
28

Troll post.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 10:22 PM
3

Again, it is worse than rape, straight from the words of a victim of rape. Buh bye rape and Dahmer apologist! It does nothing to eliminate cancer, in fact by damaging the cells the additional healing and stress shortens the telomeres and makes cancer more likely along the scar. Meatal Stenosis is literally only an prominent issue among the mutilated.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:00 AM
3

It is definitely sexual and forced (parents cannot consent for a child to be raped), invented for sexually abusive purposes, and not for medical purposes. You honestly are going to tell a child rape victim who refused to testify against the rapist until he could testify against the mutilator who harmed him more that he doesn't know what he is talking about. Hmm? You are the clueless one, sir - demonstrably. Being a child rape apologist on top, is not helping. I pissed in pain for 20 years, you d…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:48 AM
3

I'm sorry, but it is very much worse than just rape. I was raped, and I know which was worse. Rape with knives inside your genitals is fucking rape and sadism. Jeffery Dahmer isnt a rapist then, in your twisted mind?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:37 AM
3

As a man who has had his ability to sense "fullness" removed, you will live without the capacity to be sexually satiated. The biological demands, leaving you more prone to violence/demeaning behavior and a cycle of ever more increasing levels of perversion from the reliance on the psychological as it tries to account for what is missing physically. That is why it is done, to make men procreate like starving animals and then to be trapped in a religion of denial, while being a slave to the meager…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:36 AM
3

It is child rape, as a victim of child rape at 9, who demanded the right to testify against the mutilator before testifying against the 40 year old child rapist who kept mre silent for years by way of a gun, at least he only threatened to take out parts of my body with a gun. The same cannot be said for the child mutilator, who actually did with a knife.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:32 AM
5

The weird position is clearly the one where a person supports knifing baby dicks.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:26 AM
7

You are a child rape with knives advocate and you and Jeffery Dahmer have too much in common.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:25 AM
3

10-20% of cut men pissing in pain from meatal stenosis is nominal? Incorrect. I didn't know the pain I experienced was abnormal, and this is CHILD RAPE with KNIVES
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:07 AM
2

This argument is so absurdly flawed, and we've discussed it previously. The case for allowing it is already lost, it is not a minority opinion - the majority of people see child rape with knives is NOT OKAY.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:28 AM
3

child rape with knives advocate says what? This just in, people without lips are more attractive to other people without lips because "denial"!
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:21 AM
2

It seems that him coming to his bail-bondsman to make an arrangement to begin with is a pretty strong show of good faith.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:20 AM
2

Why do you say that he was going back to jail? He came to the office to sell his truck to them, right? For 4k to put towards the bail? It said that she was afraid of him finding out she didn't have the money, since it was a ruse to get him in the office?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:56 AM
8

Holy shit, what is this insanity. She lied to him to get him in the room (fraud), locked the door (literally kidnapping) then freaking killed him! PSYCHO. HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN!
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:39 AM
7

Including cutting parts of them off? No. Stop.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 01:35 PM
4

You have a link to the source per chance?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 03:45 AM
6

Live in NYC, while it can be scary Liberal here (I've personally witnessed people screaming and threatening somebody just for suspecting they were a Trump supporter), the undercurrent has some strong conservatives who just don't speak much, likely due to said screaming and threatening.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:14 PM
0

Eg "Jewish Supremacy"
/r/MensRights04/03/18 06:24 AM
13

Okay. WE CAN define raping infants with knives as Child Sexual Abuse and Child Endangerment, so lets ignore religion (because what is that?) and focus on stopping infant and child rapists who like to use knives!
/r/MensRights03/03/18 07:11 PM
14

and forcing them to become like other people. The HORROR! How dare we treat them like everybody else!
/r/MensRights03/03/18 04:44 PM
2

Seriously, other men's "material" on yours...
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:37 PM
2

Could somebody explain to me exactly what an alt-right is?
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:10 AM
2

And if you did have issues with those things related to it? Say you got herpes or spent your entire childhood with painful urination but didn't know it wasn't supposed to hurt because you never knew different? You want to invalidate people who have had severe problems by screaming, "I am FINE and none of you were harmed because I am fine!" like a god damned moron?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:00 PM
2

z-plasty
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:18 PM
2

You can stop now, he has demonstrated he isn't real. "I wouldn't want to be more sensitive" = "I wouldn't want to see more colors"
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:14 PM
2

Sorry, wrong again the Corpus Cavernosum and vestibules are homologous structures in both genders. The penis is equivalent to the whole of the vagina with the opening of the vagina closing over to extend the urethra along the length of it with the frenulum at the top homologous to the clitoris. The cut for a male is equal to a horizontal cut across the mid point of the vagina with everything above it removed and pulled tight.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:02 PM
1

Equivalent in women to the typical male cut would remove half of the skin from a woman starting midway up the vestibule and if the Frenulum is removed if is effectively identical to the removal of the clitoris (the clitoris is NOT homologous to the penis, that is absurd)
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:09 PM
5

No. Huge loss in sensitivity. You are simply wrong. Men cut have lost what in a woman would be half of the skin from her vagina.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:02 PM
10

nothing bad? Are you mental? 1 in 10 cut boys piss in pain every day of their lives, many not even aware that pissing isn't supposed to be painful (i didn't know). Boys having their dicks bleed and open wounds when too much is removed or leech blood when erect (making BJs taste like BLOOD). Then you have skin bridges which are hygiene nightmares to clean under hard scar tissue. No, no no no no no no. Boys getting herpes from Rabbi's, dying, etc is SO MUCH BAD. If some Rabbi gave you herpes as a …
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:39 PM
2

Don't care what organs you have - you can rape and be raped. How is. what exactly is this comment? Other commenter was only wrong that I still use the word "gender" instead of "sex", not because I think its a different property but because to me "sex" is still an activity, like "back rub" or "shaving". I do not understand using it in a descriptive context, like sentences starting with "I am..." unless ending with a word such as "god", "expert", "worker", etc. Call ME old school, lol.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 06:05 PM
17

false, false and false. 1 in 10 men piss in pain because of it, due to meatal stenosis. 10 in 10 suffer insatiability issues liken into lacking nerves that sense when one is "full". You are creating a rape culture of men who seek psychological denigration and perversion to make up for what they lack physically and require biologically/evolutionarily. Reduce STDs with intimacy, not pound-until-i-bleed-because-i-have-no-feelings
/r/MensRights25/02/18 03:04 AM
14

check my username and think harder. I know you can do it! That grey matter is more than a hat stand!
/r/MensRights25/02/18 03:02 AM
16

Yeah, no. Its child rape with knives. As weird as your ass, right - we all know people might not clean that properly either, so let's start hacking infants.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:58 AM
25

Deeply Sacred = Deeply Perverse and Unjustifiable crime. This is another propaganda/fear tactic piece. Enforcement would be absolutely nothing like described. Enabling justice in regards child endangerment empowers communities to protect innocent children in instances where intervention is necessary. Plenty of people park illegally, but that is no reason to legalize all forms of parking. This is propaganda, make genital mutilation illegal. It is a millennia overdue that this is still tolerated, …
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:46 AM
4

"Scientific community" is anybody with a grant of money. The articles and studies have failed peer review by multitudes, but the media acts to ignore, bully, create a culture of ridicule and suppression. It is done though, the game is over for them.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:40 AM
6

No. Studies claiming that failed to account for religious bias (group religiously predisposed against extramarital sex), were given additional information and did not account for healing time, the months when sex was impossible. Even with all those manipulations, the results were still so miniscule that a "relative reduction" was "math'd" into existance to make a couple instances more in one group than the other look significant. In short, the study was pure and complete propaganda. The reason t…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:02 AM
1

This brigading is getting really stupid. Stop kthnx
/r/MensRights24/02/18 04:32 PM
1

The homosexuality between Jonathan and David is literally from the scripture where it describes them getting naked with each other.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 08:39 AM
13

Stop mutilating boys and maybe I would have an ear for this drivel. Seriously, show me 100% abandonment of the practice worldwide and I would drop to my knees towards Mecca.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 07:30 AM
1

E.g. Florida lawmakers need more human chattel.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:44 AM
3

more than that, i was molested when i was 9 and told my parents that what they did was far worse than a 9 year old being raped by a 40 year old neighbor for 5 years. i was able to heal from one, but not the other. you are literally worse than child rapist in my eyes, as a child rape survivor. a matter of fact, but i hope you read those books. you need them badly. lastly, i am quite conservative.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:08 PM
4

Oh! Only left wing liberal nut jobs write books? That is good to know that about the authors of books like The Bible/Torah?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:50 PM
4

How about you read Parenting. Or a book on how not to screw your child up even worse than you have in his formative years, already laced with violent sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:39 PM
3

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. You have one step left to go. A new father - bored - you are bad at this.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:16 PM
6

Yup. Still trolling. A non-troll would have dropped it by now. Fake baby, fake story, fake news, fake concern.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:04 PM
5

No. It is your son's rights as a man to have body and genital integrity. Thank you for proving that you are trolling and brigading this sub that you know nothing about. Go take care of your fake baby.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:30 PM
5

No, he didn't. And we've got "confirmation bias" and "cognitive dissonance" at play here. Not to mention, your story is bull shit and none of it is true. You would not be here if it were true. You would be sleeping.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 07:42 PM
2

In order to be comparable, you'd have to add - "... by cutting the lips off entirely" I would obviously have a huge problem with you cutting your children's lips off.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:45 PM
2

1 out of 10 males you know are pissing in pain from Meatal Stenosis. Most do not know it is not supposed to hurt. Not a single figure above justifies IMPOSING pain on 1 in 10 (or death, injury) to avoid the RISK of anything.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:32 PM
3

Its better to operate on an organ that is undeveloped and impossible to gauge its end size, risking the horror of literally ripping his dick apart when he gets an erection - thats seriously what you believe.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:29 PM
3

You realize that mutilating children is worse than rape right, Jeffery Dahmer?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:27 PM
1

He is not a real person, he is a troll. It was explained to him why it was bad and he just kept asking, "why is it bad" a ignore/block.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:24 PM
2

It is just a word, like "Marriage" - is marriage not classed as marriage when it is forced onto a child? Is it the same thing?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:19 PM
16

Do not work at Google. If you currently do, quit. Loads of other places will hire you, be real. The people I know at Google are privacy invading shit-smears, and you will be happier being far far away from them.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:24 AM
2

Signs at specific or dangerous corners IS frustrating. I get annoyed in situations where I can't see around corners when driving. Nothing really to see here.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:40 AM
1

Be sure to have a counselor on hand, and support. Your situation sounds like a primed fuse for issues down the road if you were pushed to such desperation. You do not want to let those feelings influence choices that lead to further suffering. With that in mind! I am incredibly happy for you!
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:45 AM
9

My religious beliefs declare that children who are born free of defect need no alteration. That circumcision is to be done away with. You are imposing on my religious freedom with this practice, and the freedom of children to be apart of it. "My Body is a Temple" and your people, above all, MUST respect and not assault and desecrate the temples that are other individual's bodies!
/r/MensRights18/02/18 11:26 PM
4

Curious if as a trans-man, how family court issues would work. Like, if you had biological children would they bias towards your wife, even though they are yours? Just pondering, and providing welcoming dialog.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 08:25 PM
1

I always considered the sensitivity of the glans to be pain. Thats what they are referring to. They do not understand that the glans is a "plug" to stabilize, not stimulate.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 02:29 AM
1

No. Literally, I know pedophiles. I was raped by one. Self-hatred defines them in EXACTLY the same way self-hatred encourages pedophiles/circumcisers to mutilate infants. The man who raped me when I was 9 wrote a god damn novel where a child molester character was brutally killed by wild animals. It comes down to the nature of Taboo. Both hated and worshiped simultaneously. Cure the taboo, and it all goes away. It is a normal freaking penis, having one isn't scary or weird, just leave other's th…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:58 PM
7

Yeah, its only Jeffery-Dahmer-esk child rape. Not bad, right?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:36 AM
1

Unfortunately, your conclusion is unfounded. The universe is cyclical, and while some of what you say will happen, generations will forever rediscover it again and again.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:05 PM
1

tl;dr - Feminism is good because it allows women to explore responsibility and realize that life with it is not all candy and lollipops.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:02 PM
20

Then there are people like me who considered it more damaging than their own rape over 5 years as a 9 year old, including the resulting dissociative disorder. I was more able to heal from one, than the other for which my own body was a trigger for transition for many years, until I restored. I morn people like Jonathan Conte, a friend who helped me deal with many issues - now deceased from suicide undoubtably related or every guy I meet who inadvertently or explicitly gives away their unknowing …
/r/MensRights04/02/18 11:25 PM
18

Exactly like a person’s mouth. Morning breath is no reason to cut out your tongue, or the tongue of your child.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 11:16 PM
13

You can’t watch this and honestly avoid the reality that this person is a sadistic child molester.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 05:38 PM
2

This is a really great video. Please don’t knee-jerk downvote. Seriously, it’s so beautifully written I had a few tears from it.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 10:12 AM
3

I think your questions are great, thanks for asking them. There are lots of diverse opinions, but overwhelmingly there is a rational/practical approach to relationship dynamics. It’s like a splash of cold water to the face from time to time, in a world that grows so crazy every day that it feels like I must be hallucinating. Personally, I am left-leaning. I care about climate change, and gay marriage. With gay marriage legal, that’s about all what is left of their platform that appeals to me. Ec…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:30 PM
11

What did I just watch. Woah.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 09:55 AM
3

I’ve contemplated this extensively as a survivor or rape when I was 9 by a man in his 40s for more than 5 years. I know that he was emotionally immature, likely never had a serious emotional relationship. He hated himself, that he made very clear. I think there is plenty to explore in this domain of psychology, and much to gain in regards to Men’s Rights to correct and address these problems rather than demonize and do nothing practical. Apparently that’s all that society wants to do to address …
/r/MensRights31/01/18 08:47 PM
9

Disgusting
/r/MensRights28/01/18 03:38 PM
8

This undoubtably happens rampantly. 3/4 boys in my family had complications, which is insane. At least one of them they actively hid and tried to cover up that it was the cause of a life threatening staph infection!
/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:12 PM
4

Congratulations! I encourage you to persist as it is worth it for you and your partners. Never be discouraged and own your own body. I am full coverage myself but I regularly wear a retainer. Take comfort in that, regardless of your end result you are pushing the standard towards the natural for what people expect, and there are lots of guys/gals that happily celebrate your restoration.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 07:04 AM
7

I know of very convincing correlations set forth in Circumcision, The Hidden Trauma : How an American Cultural Practice Affects Infants and Ultimately Us All Beyond that I can anecdotally report that before restoration, I struggled with insatiability in regard to masturbation as well as experiences with partners who had been damaged enough that they could not achieve even orgasm (which is a rung much lower than satisfaction) without anal stimulation. This led me to suspect that there may be a co…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 06:42 AM
8

Even in that situation, there are better/lower-risk/faster-healing surgical alternatives such as a Z-plasty or preputioplasty where no skin is removed. Circumcision predates knowledge of volumetric solids and really should be done to no-one.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 07:40 AM
4

I knew this would happen. The world can wake up now and realize that "tech jobs" aren't just fun and games to get your worthless children out of your basement.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:33 AM
18

Religious discrimination, Jesus Christ! It's "religious discrimination" to say gay people can be married. This argument is absolutely absurd and it's asinine that for this particular issue it is always brought up. This is outright CHILD ENDANGERMENT and it is disgusting that people think it is okay to use religious tolerance so selectively for this issue and causally ignore it to persecute parents of children who subscribe to "spare the rod, spoil the child."
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:29 AM
4

Surgical methods exist as well, and they are less risky and heal faster. Circumcision is stone age, we don't understand volumetric solids stupid. Preputoplasty is two incisions and a fold. Can not get simpler then that.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 04:51 AM
2

It's like everyone in that community just got out of High School and still think the same kind of drama applies as adults. Oh wait, that's exactly why this keeps happening. Remember io.js? They had some good reasons at least, but it's all down hill from here folks. Best to leave them to their own immaturity and self destruction.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 03:41 PM
15

I carved a swastika on my child's head, it's my right to influence his upbringing. This is your argument. Are you cognizant enough to recognize the invalidity of this framing? Are you oblivious to your special pleading? Do you actually think your religion hasn't been used as a banner for evil or by some other reason think it deserves special treatment?
/r/MensRights24/08/17 08:33 AM
17

You mean practicing your religion on your child. You and the other child sacrificing religions should petition to demand your continued right to kill and infect babies with STDs. It's your right.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 08:10 AM
6

Is "those catholic pedophile priests" anti-catholic? Not everything is anti-Semitic. Also, both are sexual acts and not all rape involves deriving pleasure. For example sadomasachism, was Jeffery Dahmer not a rapist, because he was a sadist? It's not other people's fault that their religeon is founded on sexual sadism and mutilation. In order to be antisemitism it must be against them as a race or otherwise immutable. Their beliefs are a different dimension. Being against beliefs is always fair.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:56 PM
6

The penis is composed of what is the left and right vestibules of the vagina and corpus cavernosum. Male circumcision removes as much as half of the skin covering these organs which equates in women to half of the skin (approximately) from midway between the opening to the cervix and the urethra up to and including the clitoral hood. Given that understanding, the connection is much easier to see, as the removal of that much skin from a woman would be horrific and definitely mutilation. As such i…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:35 AM
1

should not be attacked for their religion. Why? They can attack everyone else using their religeon, some before they can defend themselves, therefore stands to reason that the people they attack is perfectly justified in fighting back.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:32 AM
3

If I remember this incident correctly, he later called the cops on them. If this is the same incident I remember.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:59 PM
2

See, now your talking sense. I mean, I get that you are trolling this subreddit now and genuinely don't care about men (like my brother) fighting for life because of barbaric culture. In fact, I'm realizing that you think dead babies is funny, ha ha. You trolled me, good job sociopath. Get a job (and a decent sense of morality). Insulting people's masculinity sure is funny, and productive though, right, DUDE /s
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:41 PM
2

No really, have you never heard that? A "dude" is a pimple on a horses ass. Fake news is still news, right? So what about Fake Good News? Gospel cough
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:55 PM
2

Oh! You found me out! I'm actually an alien from the planet Kolob. Dudebro! I always thought a dude was a zit on your ass?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:52 PM
2

I feel really bad that you think you are in any way in the majority in this discussion. You've fallen face-first on every point, and conveniently ignored all the points you lost on. And now you've just run out of them, haven't you? note: reposted as referencing Leviticus 14:52 is apparently not allowed (keep that in mind bible thumpers! Your scripture is not allowed!)
/r/MensRights28/03/17 01:51 PM
6

I gave you the results of 9 studies, not one outlier. So you are saying 'undiagnosed cases' means it isn't valid - GUESS WHAT I'm undiagnosed too! Does that mean it don't piss in pain every fucking day? When did you last get checked for it?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:37 PM
3

Seriously, do a fucking google search, before you make yourself look any stupider: http://www.jpurol.com/article/S1477-5131(10)00434-1/abstract Of the 132 cases, 27 (20.4%) had severe meatal stenosis (diameter < 5 F). Thickening of the bladder and bilateral hydronephrosis (pyelocaliceal) were found in three cases (11.1%), and a voiding cystourethrogram was performed to reveal vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). One patient had grade II VUR in his right kidney and grade III in his left kidney; another h…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:26 PM
6

Meatal Stenosis effects up to 20% of ALL CIRCUMCISED MEN, it is not caused by infection in the surgical wound or higene, it is caused by irritation of the meatus as a direct result of the lack of the organ specifically evolved to prevent it. Do a freaking google search before making yourself out to the ignoramus you obviously are! It isn't hurting you a bit Jesus, do you have eyes, can you not read that I just said multiple times that it hurts me every fucking day? making MR look stupid, please …
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:18 PM
4

Key point - hacking of part of your child and giving away all of your child. You aren't good at getting key points. I'd rather be sold into slavery whole, than to be cut into pieces and sold individually packaged. edit: You have a severe problem with trying to downplay the act of cutting off parts of infants bodies, as if it's somehow except from all other morality that would say that taking a knife to another person's body for no medical reason, and without their consent is abhorent. And that d…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:06 PM
5

it isn't actually with the act of circumcision And you'd be 100% wrong with that assumption. It is entirely to do with the act of circumcision. Not to mention the fact that by being dismissive in this regard, you are just demonstrating your cognitive dissonance - as nobody would jump to that conclusion otherwise. Especially not to somebody who suffers body dysmorphia, 20+ painful urination that continues to this day, and psychological trauma related to having part of their body hacked off withou…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:02 PM
5

ancient societies had a lot of rules and laws that aren't cool in our era This includes circumcision. We have running water now... edit: and I have demonstrated that it is just as bad as selling your children to their rapists. I mean you are literally sawing off part of your child, which is worse than giving away your whole child. Circumcision is absolutely a requirement. So you admit that your religion is penis obsessed, yay - we are making progress. edit: I could walk out the door and claim th…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 10:25 PM
4

Here is exactly what most ignorant people think Fixed that for you. I will agree with you that the problem is ignorance. Why does circumcision bother you so much? I answered that question in the second post to you.. Did you bother to read those links? Because if you didn't, then that would explain why you are so oblivious to the fact that you are talking directly to a person who REFUSED TO TESTIFY against a man who RAPED him, because his GENITAL MUTILATION caused him more physical and emotional …
/r/MensRights24/03/17 10:14 PM
3

So... "treating women like property" isn't time tested? We didn't do that for.... all of human history? Your own Torah has explicit points where "Women are to be GIVEN to the men who rape them" for example. (or as it is worded: The man is 'forced' to marry his rapee) utterly fundamental to the faith Unfortunately, no - it isn't fundamental in any way to the faith. Can you be Jewish without being a dependent of Abraham? If you don't circumcise are you not jewish? (So you discriminate against men …
/r/MensRights24/03/17 10:05 PM
6

penis-obsessed Hilarious! Because if you knew anything about Judaism - worship of the penis was part of the originating culture! You are defending a religion that is penis-obsessed and projecting it onto the people criticizing it. Wake up, the coffee is ready! To quote myself: Yeah, it's pretty perverse that people in these communities are so obsessed with the state of the penis that they discriminate against children who are whole and threaten that they are willing to die over their right to ta…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 09:53 PM
6

To your edits: not a false equivalence to compare FLDS to Judaism Wow, discrimination against religion much? I didn't realize that you consider the followers of one religion inferior to the followers of another. more or less making up as they go. You mean just like the jewish scholars, like Maimonades, or all the other religious leaders making unjustifiable claims (using faith, etc) who are making shit up as they go?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 09:50 PM
6

The fact that it is legal to mutilate the genitals of human beings in a country is of higher priority than any of those. I have said in the past, that what the hell is anybody doing fighting about healthcare or god damn "separation of church and state - under god" or all the bullshit issues you are complaining about while fucking GENITAL MUTILATION is legal. Seriously, go fuck yourself! edit: We live in a world where it is acceptable by some people to attack and mutilate men and babies, but you …
/r/MensRights24/03/17 09:44 PM
6

Slavery? What? See that just outs you as not having even bothered. Here, I'll link you directly, because your don't seem to care enough about other human beings to due diligence. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5ystxs/comment/det9pgm https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5xrizj/comment/dekunxy https://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/comments/5pd9zm/comment/dctjagd Edit: Not to mention, you can't just throw out that I gave false equivalencies (that aren't at all) while you…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 09:27 PM
8

So... in FLDS communities it's cultural to marry young women off to old men, treat them like property and rape them. They're religeous beliefs are barbaric. Please review my comment history before making such ignorant statements in the future.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 09:00 PM
2

Yes. In multiple places in Africa it is legal and culturally ingrained if a man is not cut by a certain age, a mob will attack and mutilate them.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 08:55 PM
2

The penis is composed of what is the left and right vestibules of the vagina and corpus cavernosum. Male circumcision removes as much as half of the skin covering these organs which equates in women to half of the skin (approximately) from midway between the opening to the cervix and the urethra up to and including the clitoral hood. Given that understanding, the connection is much easier to see, as the removal of that much skin from a woman would be horrific and definitely mutilation. As such i…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 07:27 PM
10

Same reason HPV infected mothers can have children who don't have HPV. Where it is cut, it does not have blood flow. A mother can have a different blood type than the child without killing both of them too. The more you know!
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:59 AM
6

I refused to testify against the man who molested me when I was 9 until the more damaging act of genital mutilating was banned. I experienced painful urination for most of my life and childhood due to undiagnosed Meatal Stenosis (I was not aware that painful urination was abnormal) as well as inorgasmia later in my life. Three of the four men in my family suffered complications including one requiring plastic surgery and another nearly dying from a staph when pustules erupted on his back after h…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:05 AM
7

Nowhere near the same ballpark. Yeah umbilical cord does not have blood flow, and doesn't make the child susceptible to blood infection.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:01 AM
39

Yes, there are tons of infections you can get when you put an open wound in a diaper with piss and shit. Not to mention staph, which nearly killed my older brother.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:28 PM
9

To argue contrary to your last point, most people who fail to see the correlation have no understanding of the comparative anatomy, or a faulty understanding. The penis is composed of what is the left and right vestibules of the vagina and corpus cavernosum. Male circumcision removes as much as half of the skin covering these organs which equates in women to half of the skin (approximately) from midway between the opening to the cervix and the urethra up to and including the clitoral hood. Given…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 04:33 PM
8

I completely disagree with you. As somebody who's "normal function" was destroyed by it resulting in painful urination for 20 years of my life due to Meatal Stenosis/irritation of the meatus as well as inorgasmia.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:26 PM
3

I assume you meant "condemn"? I think you would have a much better impact by addressing what people should do versus sarcasm. Sarcasm may be effective for those interested and capable of introspection, but it may end up looking bad by the audience of knee-jerk reactionaries.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:19 PM
1

An easy solution that would be curious for you would be to remove the button entirely.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 07:23 PM
2

Read away. I assume you know how to use Reddit, right? Also, for the record. That response hardly serves as an excuse for your behavior here.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 04:48 AM
2

Yeah, am cut. I find the people like you to be more repugnant. Especially to people like me who were legitimately harmed by it. I have never felt shamed except by people who insist on delegitimizing my medical issues (who is shaming who here?), because like the majority of the people like Brother K are all cut too.... so yeah. They wouldn't protest vehemently if it never affected them. You are so lost in your defensive delusion that you are blind to yourself accusing them of shaming themselves.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 04:41 AM
1

In this case I'd have to agree, as I don't hate myself.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 04:23 AM
2

Wait wait wait. You think somebody using a word that has been used in another context instantly means that a person is comparing whatever is the subject against every usage of the word ever? Uh... I'm sorry, but that's so ridiculous that it is funny
/r/MensRights07/02/17 12:13 AM
1

Yeah, it's pretty perverse that people in these communities are so obsessed with the state of the penis that they discriminate against children who are whole and threaten that they are willing to die over their right to take a knife to somebody else's dick. Maybe you should step back a bit and rethink your life.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 12:02 AM
18

Neither of those are races. Religion != race. Does hating Mormons, Scientologists or Baptists for their lies make you racist against white people? Edit: I added Scientologist. Thought it made the point better.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:50 PM
1

You need to learn empathy then and stop projecting your experiences on others. I for one suffered 20 years of painful urination due to the surgery and sexual issues (inorgasmia). It's fine if you were lucky, mad props! You one the lottery! I on the other hand still piss in pain because of it from time to time despite restoration and know first hand the difference it makes. It does make it easy to recognize trolls though who lie about being cut as adults and liking it more.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:38 PM
1

Yeah, that's a logic fail. What do you know about amputating (insert body part here) if you've never had (insert body part here) amputated? The person who has said body part knows more than the person that lacks it. Saying otherwise is literally like being lectured about colors by somebody who is color blind.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:33 PM
2

Not true, I suffered 20 years of painful urination because of it. And my brother nearly died from a staph infection. I have known men who are incapable of orgasm and who bleed at their circumcision scar. Nearly every man cut as an infant has complications, most don't even know it. The cause of my pain, Metal Stenosis, effects as many as 20% of cut men, and like me - most don't know that it isn't supposed to be painful.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:30 PM
3

You are very empathetic. I respect that. I believe it's possible to help people grow beyond tradition, no matter the circumstances. Coming from a very religious and traditional community myself, I have learned that as people grow older change is important to keep them young.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 01:45 AM
4

I can assure you they have more reason to fear a grudge from you than the other way around. Have some self respect.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:57 PM
1

Yes.. they do. Protection, keeping and keeping your eyes internal instead of dried out. Same function as your cheeks and lips too.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 02:50 PM
1

It's insanely comparable, what mental dysfunction is preventing you from the obvious. They literally perform the same function.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 12:11 AM
1

Would you like a list of other pieces of skin that would severely disable you had they been amputated? We can start with your eyelids. Like I already said, the amputation of that portion of my genitals, containing many sensory, vascular, and muscle systems causes me daily pain. It's not just skin buddy.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 11:41 AM
1

Read again. Also, please share the name or cause of the ailment that you suffered so greatly from before you had portions of your bodies sexual organs amputated?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:09 AM
1

To continue this conversation, turn to comment one. Remember how out main character experienced painful urination on a daily basis, sexual difficulty and even a brother's life and death battle against inflicted life threatening illness (staph). How will others experiences be irrationally and unintelligently invalidated by our lovable self absorbed egoist this time? Let's watch!
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:44 AM
0

By all means, enjoy. The Streisand effect is in my favor
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:33 AM
1

So.... Most everybody on Reddit... But yeah, it's not a troll, obviously. I'm stating facts, not trying to rile you up. I couldn't give a shit. It is what it is, now do something with it. For the record, attacking my username is pretty sad attempt at a rebuttal.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:34 PM
1

You'd be wrong about that. I have the letter in my Google Doc, sent to the Governor of Utah and the Prosecutor, but I'm obviously not going to share that much personal information. I have more than one account, the name indicates what I use this one for.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:06 PM
2

Cool story bro, I refused to testify against the man who molested me unless I be granted the right to testify against the man who mutilated me. I'm glad you don't piss in pain every day (meatal stenosis), but don't think that means your have free reign to invalidate other's experiences.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 01:43 PM
3

I dunno. He seems skeezy as hell to me. A bit too consumed by his own thoughts.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:37 AM
1

No... It isn't. You are delusional.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 07:49 PM
4

A majority of women really don't prefer it... You get down voted because that's simply not true.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 01:07 AM
10

Male Infant Genital Mutilation and Male Suicide
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:43 PM
0

Can confirm that many multiples of women do this in the subway as well.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 07:32 PM
3

When I was 20, I learned that I had been genitally mutilated and was outraged that purely because I was deemed male, it was permissible to amputate portions of my genitals. Later, I had discussions with my own parents about their divorce, survived a physically abusive relationship and kept up with the other MRA talking points. I began to empathize even more strongly with other aspects of the cause, with hesitation. Eventually it all solidified over time as the opponents and much of the media beg…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 11:07 PM
5

That is irrelevant. I personally suffered painful urination (finally cured after several years of foreskin restoration), and my brother nearly died from a staph infection - not to mention the emotional and psychological damage I endured and feelings of insult, rape and violation that it was inflicted. I can clean myself and wear protection, thank you very much. I'm glad you weren't harmed
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:23 PM
4

Don't forget that it's also a 14th Amendment issue - failure to provide equal protection under the law, regardless of the gender of the victim.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:21 AM
3

Well written article. Nice Job!
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:54 PM
3

Unfortunately, if your parents signed a consent form - as the law stands - you would have to prove it was botched, the consent for forged, or for whatever reason your parents were under duress, etc. That said, it is a violation if the 14th amendment for the FGM law to discriminate on the basis of sex, so this should (assuming our court systems have a semblance of sanity to them, which they probably don't) apply to men as well. Given that could make either the FGM law unconstitutional entirely (w…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 05:48 PM
7

Just going to throw this out, but realization of my circumcision led me to grief and emotional harm such that I refused to testify against the man who molested me, whom my patents suggests was to blame for THEIR mistake to have portions of my genitals removed. There is serious harm done, and like most i my molestation which I repressed, i don't remember most of that either. That doesn't make either okay.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:17 AM
1

I think you typo'd there. Also I'm circumcised and you're an idiot. My personal experience is just that. Personal experience. Don't take reality personally, you'll be happier, I promise.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:53 PM
1

As part of my restoration I noticed a huge change in my perspective on sexuality from a more frenzied aggressive psychology based one to one centered around sensation and intimacy. I wouldn't be surprised in the least.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:49 PM
3

Obvious troll is obvious. (And really poor quality)
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:48 PM
2

It matters equally as much as it matters what I would have wanted, which is not to be an 'mgm-survivor'. The difference is that while my right to an intact body was stripped away, you are still free to become circumcised at your own agency. Human Rights supports personal agency in regards to bodily integrity, and does not support stripping people of that agency before they are able to consent to it. Assuming you are jewish, is it your belief that one who converts to Judaism and is circumcised as…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:47 AM
2

Thank you. :-) very informative.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:23 PM
2

its more difficult requirements for transference to males Which are?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:10 PM
2

and that is what I want for myself. Again, "Human Rights" is not "whatever I want for myself".
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:08 PM
2

I'm not sure where I would reference it. I read somewhere that the circumcision rate was as high as 90% during my father's generation. I cursory google search rendered this: It peaked at 90% in 1964
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:48 PM
7

My brother and sister in law had reservations about circumcising their first boy. The doctor convinced them that it was too tight, and that is why they did it. I am pretty certain the majority reason circumcision persists in the USA is due to a 'misinformation phenomenon' because an entire generation was circumcised to prevent masturbation, and a vast number of doctors don't seem to realize that an infant's penis is not fully developed at birth, or if they do (which is probably rare) project the…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:33 PM
2

Hello IngeniousGenious! I do not know a single person who regrets circumcision or wishes they could have made the choice. I'm a single person who regrets his circumcision and wishes he could have made the choice! It's a pleasure to meet you.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:08 PM
8

I would say cultural relativism puts male circumcision clearly on the other side of the line. I'm okay with eating bugs, and baptism though but mutilating the genitals of any child is way beyond the tolerable dose of crazy.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:49 PM
3

It doesn't bother me nearly as much as it bothers you apparently. I am willing to bet you are the outlier.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:22 PM
2

"The reason you got an ear infection is because you didn't have your ears cut off..." That is what you sound like right now...
/r/MensRights12/09/13 08:10 AM
1

Why do those who claim to be circumcised not answer me when I ask them what have they suffered from? Take a gander at this comment
/r/MensRights12/09/13 08:08 AM
2

ITT: upvotes are being given to the person too stupid to form complete sentences.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:58 AM
4

Believe it, because it is true. it's relevant because it means i find your story totally unbelievable. Wow! That is a complete sentence! Level two is a coherent one, let's see if you can do that next.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:50 AM
8

so mothers come up to you and start talking about how they are getting their son circumcised today? What? How in god's name is that relevant? That isn't even a complete sentence! Try learning how to construct a complete thought and then your pity for me might be noticeable over the significant pity I have for you.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:48 AM
7

Only those that bring it up first (as per you i'll remember to call those parents and doctors creeps for even mentioning the procedure from now on /s, instead of just calling them sick child mutilating fuck-ups), and my own parents of course whom I have disowned over the issue.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:42 AM
24

And what they said doesn't?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:17 AM
1

Understandable
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:18 AM
1

Do you know if your boyfriend was a victim of forcible retraction? I am interested to find how common it is among boys who ended up getting circumcised later in life. The foreskin should not retract before a certain age unless it was forced, and if he doesn't remember it ever being fused (like a fingernail) then it's very likely that a doctor or parent forcibly retracted it and caused the complication that necessitated circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:28 PM
1

Super upvote.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter