TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mgtones Archive

View 30 posts and 31 comments by mgtones on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
272

mgtones/r/MGTOW07/06/18 07:57 AM
228

mgtones/r/MGTOW02/06/18 07:04 AM
156

mgtones/r/MGTOW12/06/18 11:41 PM
98

mgtones/r/MGTOW27/06/18 09:16 PM
89

mgtones/r/MGTOW16/05/18 11:18 PM
86

mgtones/r/MGTOW03/06/18 03:30 AM
71

mgtones/r/MGTOW06/06/18 11:28 AM
56

mgtones/r/MGTOW29/07/19 06:59 AM
54

mgtones/r/MGTOW16/06/18 06:55 PM
52

mgtones/r/MGTOW19/05/18 11:20 PM
39

mgtones/r/MGTOW09/06/18 03:22 AM
38

mgtones/r/MGTOW28/05/18 08:08 AM
29

mgtones/r/MGTOW11/04/19 11:38 PM
28

mgtones/r/MGTOW22/05/18 10:51 PM
26

mgtones/r/MGTOW30/06/19 09:34 PM
21

mgtones/r/MGTOW05/06/18 05:29 AM
19

mgtones/r/MGTOW13/06/18 12:05 AM
16

mgtones/r/MGTOW03/06/18 03:43 AM
14

mgtones/r/MGTOW13/06/18 03:15 PM
13

mgtones/r/MGTOW16/06/18 08:24 PM
12

mgtones/r/MGTOW15/06/18 04:09 AM
11

mgtones/r/MGTOW16/07/19 11:45 PM
11

mgtones/r/MGTOW15/06/18 04:36 AM
6

mgtones/r/MGTOW11/06/18 09:08 PM
2

mgtones/r/MGTOW11/08/19 06:48 AM
1

mgtones/r/MGTOW10/04/19 04:56 PM
1

mgtones/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 10:51 PM
1

mgtones/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 11:01 PM
1

mgtones/r/MGTOW11/04/19 11:37 PM
1

mgtones/r/MGTOW29/07/19 11:55 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's where you're wrong bro. All women are incredibly (20's) fickle. They bang you once or twice then are off to the next guy. It's easier to do it like this consistently. Even as a good looking dude who makes money it's not as easy as you think. Women are still women.
/r/MGTOW30/07/19 12:57 AM
1

Just stop bro hahahah
/r/MGTOW29/07/19 11:58 PM
1

I disagree. Women 'want' to be led by men but they also don't in the 21st century. They are so entitled, narcissistic and arrogant they will fight you even if you are a top tier man....eventually. You also have less leverage as a man now to lead. Women have endless options, their own money, endless free validation. You have less leadership power than you want to admit, it'd an old concept.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 07:22 AM
0

It basically is, just a different name I guess. Maybe implies you have a deeper connection with the person or something.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/18 11:49 PM
1

The biggest redpill truth of them all.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/18 11:33 AM
1

No it doesn't. You don't have to buy her anything. In my arrangements I make the girl pay 50/50 and live in her own house.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/18 10:20 AM
1

Not only that but who wants to control and leverage what a woman does, thinks or feels? Getting possessive over women if you have no goal of marriage/bluepill fantasies is such a waste of energy. It's better to be a carefree alpha than a controlling tradcon one.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 07:58 PM
3

My experience is different. Women will fuck you consistently and even for years without a commitment. The only commitment you are making is to regularly hang out, have fun and bang.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 07:55 PM
2

It's also the literal strategy that Tom Leykis suggests, who's worshipped on the TRP. He says when you're not over here servicing me I don't care what you do.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 07:45 PM
2

Crazy right. Seems like TRP has turned into a sub about commitment and getting the girl to commit and vice versa.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 09:17 AM
4

As long as she fucks you and you have a good time when you hang out you aren't wasting your time. Usually these girls are MORE straight to the point. You're average exclusive LTR is a far worse time sink to bang ratio.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 08:22 AM
1

Men and women are different. Nobody is debating that. But expecting to have a one way harem in the 21st century is delusional at best.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 08:17 AM
1

No, it's not beta to not hold women to a commitment you are also not holding. Now if you're holding a sexual commitment and she isn't, that's another storym
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 08:10 AM
1

Obviously no one has a problem with a deal that is solely in their favor. It's just that most men can't handle a FAIR deal. It causes an ego breakdown and beta tears. If you can fuck other women why can't she fuck other dudes? That's called an equitable deal. If you expect to have a one-sided deal you better have immense leverage. If the woman you're with is attractive and has options, you better be a billionaire or some shit, because your leverage is non-existent or means nothing.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 07:53 AM
2

Absolutely. Although it's true that it's easier for women to get laid if you allow that; it's still over all BETTER for men to have one or two side women despite if they also bang other guys. It's psychologically freeing and prevents oneitis. It also always for some amazing sexual experiences you would never have otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 04:44 AM
1

Yeah personally that part i probably wouldn't do. Unless she was a side chick that was very dirty and IDGAF. Discreetly hooking up with other people I'm fine with.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 02:23 AM
1

That's not what the dude said at all. Did you even read the post or anyone else's comments? He said don't marry, don't cohabitate, don't provide for them. He didn't say 'yeah watch women fuck other dudes while jerking off in the corner.' It's literally the exact fucking same thing as plating and having a main plate. Re-read his post.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 02:14 AM
1

Lol dude being in a open-relationship doesn't mean you pawn them off and do cuckolding fetish stuff. It's literally the exact fucking same as plating women but you actually have the ability to care about your plates on some level as a human being.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 02:11 AM
1

What everyone is saying is that it's exactly the same shit. People are just trying to shift it into cuckolding under different terminology.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 02:09 AM
5

It's not even a lifestyle man. It's just telling a chick you don't want to be exclusive. You'd be surprised how many 'normal' women are down for that. Most women now-a-days want non-exlusiveness, you'd be surprised if you bring it up.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 12:25 AM
1

Any investment a man puts into a WOMAN is deluded. Your 'perfect gf' probably has sucked 40 dudes off just in college. Most studies show that people in marriages cheat up to 30-40% of the time. Do you think your relationship is REALLY closed, ever? The difference which OP is talking about is that you don't marry, cohabitate, or become the beta provider. So what is it then? It's basically a chick you love like a good friend and you bang out and have a good time. You then do this with other women …
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 12:16 AM
1

If you have two consistent side girls at a time and a primary youll be getting more pussy than you can deal with. Committing to one woman is the antithesis of being alpha. Getting married is the antithesis of being alpha.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 12:07 AM
1

As long as you don't marry the chick, let her cohabitate, or provide for her, you are on the right end of the open relationship.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/18 11:59 PM
1

Lol are you so triggered by this idea you have to report it? Open relationships are basically the same thing as plating as long as you 1. Don't get married. 2. Don't Cohabitate. 3. Don't be a provider which OP said. You really think you're plates never fuck anyone else? Get outta here.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/18 11:57 PM
1

Most people dowvoting this don't understand what cuckolding is. Cuckolding isn't fucking a chick that fucks other dudes are you fuck other women. Cuckoldry is women fucking dudes behind your back while you stay monogamous and a beta provider. It's also raising another dudes kid. Being non-monogamy so isn't cuckoldry. If that was the case every casual relationship is also cuckoldry. Not being married, not cohabitating, agreeing to be non-monogamous is not cuckoldry. It DOES keep women around long…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/18 11:31 PM
3

Exactly. Either not play, or be opportunistic with the ruleset. I.E pump n dumper's.
/r/MGTOW20/05/18 02:14 AM
2

The truth is also as the environment changes so does mating rituals and preferences. If society continues to evovle technologically (without destroying itself first) mating arrangements may become insanely different and still be societally functional.
/r/MGTOW19/05/18 11:35 PM
3

Maybe now it does. But I wouldn't be surprised if in x amount of years child 'creation' and rearing is unrecognizable to today. I see it just as likely it becomes some black mirror level shit in the future.
/r/MGTOW19/05/18 11:28 PM
1

It's all cyclical. I would say next 50-100 years are gonna be a non-monogamy before the cycle flips.
/r/MGTOW19/05/18 11:24 PM
3

It's definitely universal. hah.
/r/MGTOW17/05/18 12:02 AM
2

looks amazing.
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 11:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter