TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mgtowthrow1 Archive

View 3 posts and 15 comments by mgtowthrow1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No serious dictionary article has such a section. "What Communism is not" or "What basketball is not". It is simply bad article writing and therefore valid criticism.
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 03:04 PM
1

You can provide references in the edit comments. But this stuff simply does not hold up to the standards of a Wikipedia article. Have you ever seen an article on Wikipedia that just lists dozens of vague references in a single sentence? References are meant to be given in the context of a sentence that conveys a particular piece of information. Also, most of your references are extremely poor standard, like The Sun or Daily Mirror, I mean seriously, who puts that shit in a dictionary entry?
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 03:01 PM
6

The majority of people are no idiots. If monogamy was such a bad deal for men, then most people in the world would not be willing to engage in it. As a general rule, if you think that the whole world is dumb except for you (and your group), then you are either a genius or you are the one who is dumb. And figuring out if you are the genius is not so straightforward if you are dumb in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 09:59 AM
1

The MGTOW phenomenon has been described in detail in books by prominent authors such as Helen Smith[15], Kay Hymowitz[16], Philip Zimbardo[17], and in many mainstream or notable newspapers, websites and other sources, including the Sunday Times[10], Breitbart News Network[18][19][20], Vice Magazine[21][22], the Daily Mail[23][24], Reason magazine[25], the Daily Telegraph[26], the Daily Mirror[27], the Sun[28], the Independent[29], the Irish Independent[30], Independent Journal Review[31], the Hu…
/r/MGTOW24/12/15 10:45 PM
2

I am 6 foot tall and I have six pack abs, what were the other two again?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:12 PM
2

Of course it is dogmatism at its best, but as far as I understand the members don't mind it, because they still can get some value from it. If the value they are getting from it is perceived or real value is a different question.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:06 AM
2

Listen bitch, all I do is point out the complexity of certain endeavors. You seem to have an issue accepting the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 09:52 AM
1

Yes I happen to have a PhD in neuroscience, therefore I know a thing or two about the limitations of human experimentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 01:49 AM
1

Psychology can make a claim to be descriptive at best. It is far away from being able to explain anything apart from very basic physiology. And even the descriptive part is not being done under well controlled experiments (because it's impossible), leaving out hundreds of parameters . That's why even the descriptive models usually fail miserably.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 01:21 AM
1

A correct psychological model would be able to predict human behavior. All psychology can do right now is to hint at tendencies of human behavior. And it does a very poor job at that. Psychology done as a correct science would only be able to predict how humans are NOT going to behave, or in other words, it can only give the range of human behavior that is biologically possible. How this range of behavior manifests itself cannot be modeled without complete information.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 12:57 AM
3

there are no other possible explanations for anything humans do, think or behave like but evolution. This sentence demonstrates your lack of biological understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 11:22 PM
6

We are more complicated than other animals, but still animals. That does not imply that we can easily model human behavior. In fact experience shows that the opposite is the case. There is more variance between individuals than between men and women, which renders any kind of models useless. It is useful even if 10% of behavior is based on genetics. Women respond well to men with broad shoulders, so lift. Easy stuff. If a study finds that females prefer males with broad shoulders and I come to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 10:53 PM
6

EvoPsych is essentially the worst kind of "empirical" science (psychology) paired with a bunch of theory-crafting. Not a good combination. The unfortunate truth is that human interactions are too complex to be put into a theory or a model. EvoPsych would be useful if human behavior was 100% determined by our genes. Obviously that's not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 10:13 PM
2

That's a real shame, these two were very interesting youtubers. Ostracizing people like messenger seems like a good idea. However, in a way it doesn't really solve the root of the problem, that is that MGTOW content producers are so vulnerable to doxxing. You basically cannot have a career and at the same time identify yourself as MGTOW. So in a way pursuing a career means not having actual freedom and not really going your own way. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be an easy way out of this …
/r/MGTOW15/12/15 06:42 AM
1

Niko Choski at beginning: https://youtu.be/5ELBoZmXZaM CS MGTOW mentions it in the video description: https://youtu.be/baYSz0qFeFw
/r/MGTOW15/12/15 12:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter