TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mhelena9201 Archive

View 48 posts and 246 comments by mhelena9201 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2550

Intactivismmhelena9201/r/MensRights10/11/20 10:18 AM
2336

Social Issuesmhelena9201/r/MensRights11/11/20 01:24 PM
1401

mhelena9201/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/20 09:54 PM
425

Progressmhelena9201/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:19 PM
414

Healthmhelena9201/r/MensRights12/11/20 08:27 AM
249

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights22/04/20 09:28 PM
167

social issuesmhelena9201/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 03:55 AM
136

Progressmhelena9201/r/MensRights10/11/20 01:36 AM
122

Edu./Occu.mhelena9201/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:42 AM
105

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights23/11/20 06:13 AM
102

Progressmhelena9201/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:45 AM
55

resourcemhelena9201/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 12:47 AM
50

Social Issuesmhelena9201/r/MensRights17/11/20 10:39 PM
48

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:12 AM
41

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:31 PM
40

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists11/11/20 01:24 PM
36

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:46 AM
35

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:34 AM
34

social issuesmhelena9201/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/20 01:44 AM
33

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:55 AM
30

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:56 PM
26

Progressmhelena9201/r/MensRights19/11/20 05:04 PM
24

Discriminationmhelena9201/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:11 AM
23

Social Issuesmhelena9201/r/MensRights12/11/20 12:07 AM
21

Discriminationmhelena9201/r/MensRights10/11/20 03:05 AM
20

Social Issuesmhelena9201/r/MensRights18/11/20 07:47 PM
19

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights23/11/20 08:41 AM
17

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists11/11/20 03:56 AM
14

Social Issuesmhelena9201/r/MensRights23/11/20 10:03 AM
14

mhelena9201/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 02:05 AM
14

Social Issuesmhelena9201/r/MensRights12/11/20 05:30 AM
12

Social Issuesmhelena9201/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:45 AM
10

mhelena9201/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 09:34 PM
10

Activism/Supportmhelena9201/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:47 PM
9

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists11/11/20 12:34 AM
8

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists23/11/20 06:13 AM
8

mhelena9201/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 03:17 AM
7

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists26/11/20 02:46 AM
6

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists12/11/20 04:33 AM
6

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists11/11/20 04:21 AM
5

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:46 AM
5

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists22/04/20 02:26 AM
4

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights26/11/20 02:45 AM
4

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:48 PM
2

mhelena9201/r/AntiFeminists23/11/20 05:47 AM
1

Discriminationmhelena9201/r/MensRights23/11/20 07:57 AM
1

Feminismmhelena9201/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:39 AM
1

mhelena9201/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 04:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

More male teachers needed these young lads say a similar thing about role models, their teacher etc: https://youtu.be/63ab208eYso https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRjp1-DgMuA great watches highly recommend
/r/MensRights29/11/20 01:36 PM
3

This erasure of science for idealogical reasons is very worrying. Look what feminists did to this paper, despite even agreeing with it!!: This is orwellian and very scary: https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-published-paper-down-the-memory-hole/ it doesnt really have method flaws, thats what SJW are claiming but its false, mentioned here: https://quillette.com/2020/11/23/retracting-a-controversial-paper-wont-help-female-scientists/
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/20 01:12 PM
1

The paper does not tell women not to have female mentors. It presents data and then says above as a possibilty. Which is a fair derivation based on that data.... now personally I think it is not a good idea, and a bit suprised they would say that.... the point is its a perfectly valid thing for a scientists to say based on some data they gathered.... they arent saying it as law they are saying that is an interpretation of some data. They clearly gave other possibilities and takes. Your butt hurt…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/20 01:10 PM
0

You literally made that up. Also they did the same with gender neutral application hires... feminist wer very much in favour until data came out that it benifits men (since they are no longer being penalised for being male) and disadbatged women (who no longer receved pussy pass diveristy hire)... feminist then fierecly oppose gender neutral hiring
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 05:50 AM
4

Methodolgy was fine, its dicussed here: https://quillette.com/2020/11/23/retracting-a-controversial-paper-wont-help-female-scientists/ and thats not reason paper was called for censorship. They hated outcome then after te fact tried to find a reason. The same methodolgy by author showed ethnic diveristy good.... no one challenged methodology then, and you know damn well if it showed women mentors were better than men no one would have an issue. This erasure of science for idealogical reasons is …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 05:46 AM
4

This erasure of science for idealogical reasons is very worrying. Look what feminists did to this paper, despite even agreeing with it!!: This is orwellian and very scary: https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-published-paper-down-the-memory-hole/ https://quillette.com/2020/11/23/retracting-a-controversial-paper-wont-help-female-scientists/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 05:43 AM
7

This erasure of science for idealogical reasons is very worrying. Look what feminists did to this paper, despite even agreeing with it!!: This is orwellian and very scary: https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-published-paper-down-the-memory-hole/ https://quillette.com/2020/11/23/retracting-a-controversial-paper-wont-help-female-scientists/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 05:42 AM
43

This erasure of science for idealogical reasons is very worrying. Look what feminists did to this paper, despite even agreeing with it!!: This is orwellian and very scary: https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-published-paper-down-the-memory-hole/ it doesnt really have method flaws, thats what SJW are claiming but its false, mentioned here: https://quillette.com/2020/11/23/retracting-a-controversial-paper-wont-help-female-scientists/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 05:41 AM
80

https://www.pnas.org/content/112/17/5360 happening all over STEM women out of COLLEGE are getting jobs men need 10 years experience to get... then when they women who are artifically promoted are crap at their job compared to a man (not because they are women, but because they are crap at the job and falsely promoted and a man to get the role would have to be far better) they call it imposter syndrom LMAO.... well yes no shit sherlock you literally are an imposter who isnt good enough to be ther…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 05:36 AM
18

Welcome to feminism 101.... you learn this method in day 1 of gender studies https://www.pnas.org/content/112/17/5360 happening all over STEM women out of COLLEGE are getting jobs men need 10 years experience to get... then when they women who are artifically promoted are crap at their job compared to a man (not because they are women, but because they are crap at the job and falsely promoted and a man to get the role would have to be far better) they call it imposter syndrom LMAO.... well yes n…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 05:33 AM
16

Ironically, feminists would turn around and say that its patriachy that male domestic violence victims are not treated seriously.... of course, feminsits (anti patriarchy) LITERALLY FUCKING LITERALLY as in ACTUALLY LITERALLY made this law
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 02:52 AM
15

That is my experience too, and studies document this well (if they are allowed to be published, usually what happens here happens and only man bad woman good studiess are allowed - see link) but the important thing is, these are just observations and generalaties... its fine to have these observations, but when it comes to judging the person in front you... ALWAYS judge the indivudal.... its not sexist to hold observations, its only sexist to act on them to discriminate people based on sex (whic…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 02:36 AM
24

This erasure of science for idealogical reasons is very worrying. Look what feminists did to this paper, despite even agreeing with it!!: This is orwellian and very scary: https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-published-paper-down-the-memory-hole/ https://quillette.com/2020/11/23/retracting-a-controversial-paper-wont-help-female-scientists/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 02:33 AM
1

You mean on posts, or as a teacher? (you teach) Do you generally give awards only to girls? (despite girls doing far better in education but assuming women are most discirminared so need most support) This is a very common phenomenan. Studies show by age 4 both boys and girls now that teachers prefer girls and that boys work will be undervalued
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/20 02:31 AM
3

Read the link posted... feminists did the remarkble step of depiblishing that aritlce on male varilablity hypothesis... they even said they agree with paper, its just "some impressionable young women" might be affected lol what they did was disgusting and sick though... orwellian. You also don't seem to get the point, they are saying men and women are exactly the same and all data must show this.... however women are better and this should be pubished heavily its called women are wonderful affec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/20 02:18 AM
22

Men and women are exactly the same.... except if women are better this is science and should be published and celebrated. There is a storm now in academia as a female academic published a paper from over 2,000,000 publications saying male mentors of female academics are better than female mentors... absolute outrage, calls for her to be fired, journal to be DE-published, etc.... some claiming no its methodlgy they are atacking (its not if you change methodolgy same results show) yet if the same …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 04:38 PM
2

https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/trickle-down-equality-and-framing-mens-issues-as-really-being-about-women/
/r/MensRights24/11/20 08:49 PM
1

trickle down gender equality
/r/MensRights24/11/20 07:18 PM
1

Ermm the whole point of mens rights is saying that we need to take a comprehensive approach with gender equality and include men in the discussion. It is feminsim, particularly and most importantly feminism with beauricractic and legal power that is doing the exact opposite, and has become a supremacist and hate movement. Your little essay about men and women being equal and good etc is exactly what MRA believes and what feminism doesn't. Feminism underlying and backbone is patriarchy theory, it…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 06:48 PM
1

They dont just get disavowed or shunned, they are not considered feminists. They are violently protested against too. You might as well say Jordan Peterson is a feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 09:44 AM
170

400 false accusations in Spain a day against men In case your wonder what this is. In Spain the man (only the man, this law does not apply to women on men or women, or men on men) would AUTOMATICALLY be arrested for 48 hours WITHOUT TRIAL and then goto a judge. The woman would then get 400 euros a month (only women). There are 106 courts ONLY for men. A woman doing the EXACT same thing to a man (or another woman) would not be a crime (it would apply normal legal process) PHD on it and how it is …
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 07:56 AM
3

There is absolutely not discussion on using gender to determine vaccine rollout despite there even being discussion on sperating jobs, race, areas to priortise people in vaccine. Being male is an independant risk factor for COVID death, ICU admission, severe illness... in UK being male alone makes it 2x more death risk.... im not saying it should be gendered, but why is not on the discussion? There is absolutely NO DOUBT that if COVID killed women 2x more it would be given to all women first bef…
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/20 07:25 AM
8

There is absolutely not discussion on using gender to determine vaccine rollout despite there even being discussion on sperating jobs, race, areas to priortise people in vaccine. Being male is an independant risk factor for COVID death, ICU admission, severe illness... in UK being male alone makes it 2x more death risk.... im not saying it should be gendered, but why is not on the discussion? There is absolutely NO DOUBT that if COVID killed women 2x more it would be given to all women first bef…
/r/MensRights23/11/20 07:21 AM
1

CHS is not considered a feminsit by 99% of feminsits and certainly the establishment
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 07:14 AM
2

MRA is not an idealogy. Feminism is.... and what those feminsits who speak of mens issues are doing is trickle down gender equalaity: https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/trickle-down-equality-and-framing-mens-issues-as-really-being-about-women/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 07:13 AM
1

ALL feminism (apart from equity feminism, which isnt considered feminism by most feminsits though) is a problem. Yes they are very diverses and intensely argue with eachother and even boycott eachother etc... however, they are all predicated no patriarchy theory.... as such ALL feminism is problematic. Believing in patraichy theory shapes everything they do and explains their sexist positions e.g. their simulatenous support for female quoatas but specifcally not male ones e.g. in nursing and tho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 07:12 AM
2

Its delierbate... Its good men aren't metioned specifically in that one as its good to have a few groups that don't mention feminism so don't get the misogyny label... I actually think its a specific decision by them. They are clearly against feminism and discuss it. Jordan Peterson is obviously extremly anti feminist (his takes on feminism and why are fantastic) however he never said he was anti feminsit per say, and denied when asked... very clever as that would have drawn a lot of false smear…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 07:04 AM
1

This is exactly what you want: https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2016/08/06/a-non-feminist-faq/ Its acadmic, referenced, and its not "anti feminist" its non feminst. Excellent written FAQ ​ Here is Christina Hoff Sommers amazing series. She is a feminsit: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLytTJqkSQqtr7BqC1Jf4nv3g2yDfu7Xmd There is Professor Janic Fiamengio, although this is hardcore anti feminist: (I think it is right. but just saying): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD65wnDGuTg
/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:59 AM
5

This should be permenant sticky. Also read articles on this site such as trickle down gender eqaulity (click hompage)
/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:50 AM
10

Female leaders actually did considerbaly worse than male leaders including in terms of death rate. Someone posted all the stats on here, can someone find the link? They also discredited the "research" showing women did better by highlight the complete gymnastics the study methodolgy employed by the feminstis to say otherwise e.g. comparing NZ (size of then entire UK but half the population of even London city, nearest neighbout 10,000 miles, peak outbreak in summer, already quarantined country) …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 07:32 PM
2

Yes of course saying men or women are better leaders at COVID by looking at death rate is stupid.... thats exactly my point... Im highlighting how dumb it was for feminists not only because that is what they are trying to say i.e women are better.... BUT SPECIFICALLY ITS SO F***G STUPID AS THE ACTUAL DATA SAYS THE OPPOSITE THING.... the level of stats maniupulation was insane.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 07:30 PM
3

BTW the BBC thing and the DV bill are two seperate thing... the DV bill was in parliment. I think it was either men and boys coalation or mankind who compained to ombudsman and won
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 05:07 PM
3

Legal action wise Mark Perry is killing it: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/another-victory-from-my-efforts-to-advance-civil-rights-and-challenge-systemic-sexism-in-higher-education-2/ 200 cases plus and he keeps winning. Check out what just one MRA group in UK has achieved: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/h80isc/but_mras_just_complain_about_feminism_they_dont/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 05:06 PM
4

BBC article on DV in young people had pictures of all female victims despite article even saying more boy victims.... MRA wrote in, they changed it.... the DV bill had some statements that MRA complained to stats ombusdman who ruled in their favour and said they had to remove comments in the report like men are overwhelming perps of coercive control or something like that (ombudsman saying you cant say ovwerwhelming, and no gender bias is obvious)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 04:56 PM
2

Theres hundreds of examples like that. I dont get why some people are so downbeat about mens issue awareness and change. Companies are very reposinsive, ive always had a positive reply to anything ive ever raised and often they change things immediately just write your bloody letter instead of complaining here is my advice to people
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 04:53 PM
5

The stats were posted here before maybe someone has link? Female leaders had considerbly hgher death rates than women, and also even more female majority a parliment it was it was worse death rate.... obviously a moron would come out with a study saying = women messed up covid. However, feminsits did so for women, but what is more shocking is how wrong the data was and how twisted it was. For example compeltely missing out female leader death rate was far higher and instead matvching individual …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 04:52 PM
5

Female leaders actually did considerbaly worse than male leaders including in terms of death rate. Someone posted all the stats on here, can someone find the link? They also discredited the "research" showing women did better by highlight the complete gymnastics the study methodolgy employed by the feminstis to say otherwise e.g. comparing NZ (size of then entire UK but half the population of even London city, nearest neighbout 10,000 miles, peak outbreak in summer, already quarantined country) …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 04:47 PM
1

Trickle down gender equality: https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/trickle-down-equality-and-framing-mens-issues-as-really-being-about-women/
/r/MensRights19/11/20 02:58 AM
1

Feminists have long known the power of words, hence their vicuious abuse of it.... and turning everything bad male e.g. manspreading etc but everything good gender neutral fireman..... even at UN level (UN actually use terms such as manspreading, manterupting etc).... anyway, I agree its excellent SIMP, white knight, has a term now so behaviour is easily known, called out etc
/r/MensRights18/11/20 07:11 PM
2

Multiple studies show women have an ingroup bias for women, men have an outgroup bias for women.... feminists psychologists in 1991 even spotted this, and were wondering why. Both men and women would rather save womens lives, kill men to save womens lives, kill more men intead of one woman, help a woman.... there are all sorts of biases too in terms of women are viewed as the more honest, more kind, more trustworthy gender, more intelligent (of course they are some bad ones too).... feminism has…
/r/MensRights18/11/20 07:04 PM
1

Im just copying and pasting a post below, so dont write it like that, but here is something useful (aus doesnt gender other policies to men so why here - see the accident strategy) Being male is an independant risk factor for COVID. Male gender gives 2x higher death rate in the UK and in most of the world it is 1.5x-3x. So feminists support giving the vaccine to all male risk groups first? So over 85s (but men), health care workers (but men - in UK 94% of dead drs were male) It turns out the UK'…
/r/MensRights18/11/20 03:00 AM
4

More feminist critical and pro female accountablity stuff is slipping through
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/20 02:51 AM
3

I share some of your view. More recently it seems they are allowed to call out toxic feminism, I will point out, more recently. Don't get me wrong I do understand the appraoch as they are trtying to be something distinct from anti feminist or turning into low quality post places. It also has lot of knowledge people so yes there are good discussions, albiet on egg shells and often leaving out elephants in rooms. They are also obviously far less rage posts, off topics, alarmism etc. and they do of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/20 02:48 AM
5

The feminsits position on gender for men is tricklle down equality: https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/trickle-down-equality-and-framing-mens-issues-as-really-being-about-women/ and also any critisicism of feminsm is misogyny and not to be tolerated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/20 02:45 AM
7

Menslib is disporoptionality appealing to men who are confused about their gender idenitity, masculinity or self image, self esteem - SELF ESTEEM being a big one Menslib has many many problems. I generally wont recommend, However, due to the heavy censorhsip and feminist moderating, it forces you to really think how to write to pass the mods so you get very good posts here and there and less to no low effort or rage posts,, but of course everything is censored making the thing shite. It also att…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/20 02:42 AM
3

Gamma bias Gynocentrism Men as a class have a slight out group bias, women as a class have an ingroup bias
/r/MensRights18/11/20 02:26 AM
1

Yes with the guardian I certainly will. Main problem with the guardian is that... when they open comments, they always get destroyed with counter arguements, and I like guardian counter arguements as they are well written. The problem is their stupid feminism articles work as they get major traffic, mainly from people who read it think WTF is this shite, but obviously cant comment. Daily mail has its problems as a new site but at least it always opens comments
/r/MensRights18/11/20 02:20 AM
1

Some states in USA apply Duluth model, which is what you describe, man is automatically at fault Id say yes it is getting a bit better as more non feminsit groups are rapidly forming to stop this shite.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/20 02:19 AM
2

Excellent summary thanks for your efforts Gamma bias explains some fo this, esepcially last point about heroes etc: https://malepsychology.org.uk/2018/12/04/why-are-there-so-many-disagreements-about-gender-issues-its-usually-down-to-gamma-bias/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/20 01:02 AM
1

some other points discussed mentioned dont change the arguement placed before.... a doctor isn't worong about medicine because theres a video about them saying something dumb about animal rights or something, different matter
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/20 09:44 PM
3

Oh actually I think I remember reading about that in Aus if im not mistaken.... its far easier in UK and USA and actually very easy to win as a man as the discrimination is normally obvious... its just there arent many cases.... MRAs have had success at UN and EU court of human rights level too.... the UN is full blown femininist, I mean actuall Buzzfeed, Tumbll manspreading feminsits (they actually talk about manspreading, manterupting etc).... so the reports dont even mention men I mean if the…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 09:36 PM
28

i will try and find link again, but I heard that movember money actually went to a lot of feminst or feminsits aligned causes or charaties who did not focus on men\ About the last point thats realy important: https://ycantboysbeboys.com/blogs/news/no-money-for-men-the-truth-behind-giving check with charaties you donate as even on UN level they do that. E.g. UN has programmes that at GUN point stopped men from accessing food cenres and only fed women with highly flawed reasoning
/r/MensRights17/11/20 09:32 PM
5

No one is suggesting womens health issues have less attention or focus, not at all, its because we are more fair and egalatrian in the first place that we are saying highlight mens health, thats what peope dont understand. Id be campaigning the other around if I thought it was women beng screwed (and I did used to, as I believe feminist spin on things about how discriminated women are in law and health and education etc.) These gaps againt men are to be expected as there is no minister for mens …
/r/MensRights17/11/20 09:30 PM
1

These gaps are to be expected as there is no minister for mens health in 98% of all countries despite at least one and usually multiple existing for women in every single country. In USA CDC has sub departments for women even though men are more likelt to die in 14/15 causes of death. in UK the cheif medical officer refused to do a mens helath inquiry and could not provide a good reason despite doing a very extensive one on womens health prior. Australia is one of the 2% of nations that does hav…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 09:26 PM
2

Female prisoners are poor, chlidhood trauma, abuse, etc..... yes yes yes thats all true, but hello so are male prisoners. She called male prisoners violent men and women prisoners improvished women gynocentrism The irony is feminsits dont understand how badly they hurt women themselves... if society did a massive effort to reduce the suffering of men and boys and improved their welfare it would help women massively and have the biggest impact on crime etc too and even massively reduce domestic v…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 04:44 PM
2

For reference They didnt make the suicide policy gender neutral, they actually gendered the suicide policy in Aus to women (despite 3x as many men dying of suicide) https://www.amhf.org.au/the_case_for_a_national_male_suicide_prevention_strategy The made accident policy gender neutral despite men: 93% of workplace deaths 84% alcohol-related injuries 81% of DIY injuries requiring hospitalisation 75% of the years of potential life lost to injury 3 in 4 suicides 3 in 4 transport deaths 3 in 4 death…
/r/PussyPass17/11/20 01:22 PM
24

The best case of action here is a lawsuit. MRAs would easily win this, as they have done so when they do go to court time and time again e.g. Marc Angelucci, Mark Perry and many more.... and if it was USA they would take it one, however the problem is while there are THOUSANDS of feminsit organisation and dozens of law organisation looking at feminsits things, MRA groups are not there yet.... a MRA law group is needed badly (it will definetly happen its just a matter of time) Back to Aus.... The…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 12:35 PM
23

The best case of action here is a lawsuit. MRAs would easily win this, as they have done so when they do go to court time and time again e.g. Marc Angelucci, Mark Perry and many more.... and if it was USA they would take it one, however the problem is while there are THOUSANDS of feminsit organisation and dozens of law organisation looking at feminsits things, MRA groups are not there yet.... a MRA law group is needed badly (it will definetly happen its just a matter of time) Back to Aus.... The…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 03:15 AM
1

Sowell is great. He is an economicst so goes down that angle a lot. You will really like Coleman Hughes, he explains some concepts so well. His take on things like quotas and reperations is very informative.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 03:10 AM
3

If youre wondering what male dispoabliity or gynocentrism is: They didnt even make the suicide policy gender neutral, they actually gendered the suicide policy in Aus to women (despite 3x as many men dying of suicide) https://www.amhf.org.au/the_case_for_a_national_male_suicide_prevention_strategy They made the accident policy entirely gender neutral not even mentioing men despite men being 70% of accidents, up to 100% if you go to specific ones https://www.amhf.org.au/10_reasons_government_s_in…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 06:12 PM
3

Where MRA have most success is suing: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/another-victory-from-my-efforts-to-advance-civil-rights-and-challenge-systemic-sexism-in-higher-education-2/ This just needs someone to sue. As MRA grows that should be a major focus, hopefully a MRA legal firm
/r/MensRights16/11/20 06:00 PM
1

Coleman Hughes, Thomas Sowell are fantastic black speakers who can say the issue 1 million times better than I can. They essentially agree with you but add stats, data, great insight etc. "Oh this is going to crash and burn so hard....They don't acknowledge anything, its all the white man's fault...nothing else. Fucking hell." Its not as bad as this. FEminists and far leftists use a marxist type opressor opressed model... as a result they dont put black men in the patriarchy categorty and tend n…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 05:57 PM
2

Legal action is easily the best route for MRA as much of the disrcimination men face are legal and it is very easy to win as the discrimination is DIRECT (not indirect i.e. it specifically says because you are a man xyz e.g. only men get death penatlty in Belarus etc) Marc Angelucc RIPi got this, hence his success... he said they key is finding a real person affected by the legislation and then suing (although you dont always have to do this)
/r/MensRights16/11/20 05:49 PM
2

Thats government funding (I'll also add men cant access that unless they sign up for the draft also, the draft being a major gender discimatinion issue more so in Europe than USA). Private scholarships, and other are even worse. 94% of sex specific scholarships are female only, and most of these are even in female dominated fields to begin with!! Mark Perry has done over 200 lawsuits about this and keeps winning https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/another-victory-from-my-efforts-to-advance-civil-righ…
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/20 05:49 PM
2

Thats government funding (I'll also add men cant access that unless they sign up for the draft also, the draft being a major gender discimatinion issue more so in Europe than USA). Private scholarships, and other are even worse. 94% of sex specific scholarships are female only, and most of these are even in female dominated fields to begin with!! Mark Perry has done over 200 lawsuits about this and keeps winning https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/another-victory-from-my-efforts-to-advance-civil-righ…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 05:49 PM
1

Legal action is easily the best route for MRA as much of the disrcimination men face are legal and it is very easy to win as the discrimination is DIRECT (not indirect i.e. it specifically says because you are a man xyz e.g. only men get death penatlty in Belarus etc) Marc Angelucc RIPi got this, hence his success... he said they key is finding a real person affected by the legislation and then suing (although you dont always have to do this)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/20 05:49 PM
2

Thats government funding (I'll also add men cant access that unless they sign up for the draft also, the draft being a major gender discimatinion issue more so in Europe than USA). Private scholarships, and other are even worse. 94% of sex specific scholarships are female only, and most of these are even in female dominated fields to begin with!! Mark Perry has done over 200 lawsuits about this and keeps winning https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/another-victory-from-my-efforts-to-advance-civil-righ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/20 05:46 PM
1

If you want to learn more about feminisms problems from a feminist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLytTJqkSQqtr7BqC1Jf4nv3g2yDfu7Xmd great series
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:45 PM
1

https://youtu.be/9QOdR_CARw0 A PHD on it: https://justiciadegenero.com/en/espana-la-igualdad-de-genero-las-leyes-de-violencia-y-su-cumplimiento-del-convenio-europeo-de-derechos-humanos-un-caso-de-discriminacion-positiva-de-los-hombres/
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:36 PM
1

Yeah JP morgans other intitiaves are hardcore full blown idealogical feminism
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:13 PM
2

Thats exactly the problem. E.g. white ribbon, even Movemeber. Its often to push pure femnist idealogy. Thats why we have to watch out and also help as many non feminsits appraoches. The Male Psycholgy Network for example is great and is specifically NOT feminist and actually useful as it has research output and so on. FInding good mens health stuff that isn't femnism is very hard. This is excceltn site that doesnt do that at all and actually carefully combats false feminism narratives e.g. mascu…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:13 PM
1

Because its black men, they do tend to not blame men or patriarchy, as feminists would say that patraichy doesn't mean black men. What we need to watch out for is any of this toxic masculinity bullshit.... luckily they dont really do it from the reports that I have read. I think same thing, as it would have racial implications.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 08:56 PM
3

All of that is true and something feminism cant have an honest discussion about. Carceral feminism is responsible for breaking up many familes and arresting men.... now some feminist do actually realise this and are very cirtical of it, for example saying that it turned domestic violence into a criminal matter and therefore arrested men, often falsely. That is the general trend with feminist idealogy. It works on an opressor opressed narrative and because men are the opressers you will always ge…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 08:51 PM
3

They certainly can be and often are, but not always.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 08:47 PM
1

Nope its not even the term that is the problem. In depth answer cited, referenced, and academic, its not an "anti feminist" rant its a non feminists academic arguement: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskTheMRAs/comments/gizwez/why\_is\_feminism\_not\_the\_answer\_to\_overcoming/
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:18 PM
0

Gynocentrism has nothing to do with killing your spouse. Your making the mistake of trying to take something and make it a catch all of applying to every single situation. Sort of how patriachy and toxic masculinity are trying to be used as a catch all to explain everything. That results in funny examples such as a the claim that skyscrapers are actually due to patraichy and toxic mascullinity men trying to make objects that look like penisis (as an example of how stupid you can get when you app…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:16 PM
3

Crime is caused by low socioeconomic status, lack of oppurtunity and abuse suffered in childhood (most criminals have had at least 5 high trauma events or 5 high stress situations) Another thing: 85% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Fulton Co. Georgia, Texas Dept. of Correction) 80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes –14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26) 70% of youths in state-operated institutions come fr…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:12 PM
2

icle
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:06 PM
2

BTW the reason that white working class boys are doing so bad is actually due to their race, its their sub culture e.g. in Asian culutre education gets status and is highly valued even in people with no education e.g. parents who did not go to uni value it and push their kids, in white culture education if both parents didnt go to university they are more likely to view education sceptically or be against it and see them as toffs/ intellectuals elitist toffs etc yes this is racial not just socoi…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:06 PM
19

Fantastic thank you. For health info check out: https://www.amhf.org.au/is_male_behaviour_putting_mens_lives_at_risk This website really is gold standard for mens health. The language and way it covers issues is great. It has released big national research into mens health and has tonnes of reports, check them out: https://www.amhf.org.au/ten_to_men_weighs_in_on_male_obesity go to news section, resources etc, tonnes of good stuff. Exactly the language we want to use in mens issues too
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:56 PM
1

Nope its not even the term that is the problem. In depth answer cited, referenced, and academic, its not an "anti feminist" rant its a non feminists academic arguement: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskTheMRAs/comments/gizwez/why_is_feminism_not_the_answer_to_overcoming/
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:51 PM
1

No there are very good reasons why feminism is not the answer to "toxic masculinity" In depth answer cited, referenced, and academic, its not an "anti feminist" rant its a non feminists academic arguement: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskTheMRAs/comments/gizwez/why_is_feminism_not_the_answer_to_overcoming/
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:50 PM
1

While Kimmel and his ilk may say that there is a healthy form of masculinity apart from toxic masculinity, it often comes off as their saying that men must act like feminist women. Though they accuse the mythopoetic men’s movement of being essentialists they themselves seem to be opportunistic essentialists. When it comes to deconstructing hegemonic masculinity and patriarchy, gender is a construct, however when it comes to offering a new way for men to act it often sounds like the way a stereot…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:47 PM
3

In UK: by age five, white boys from disadvantaged backgrounds are already 13% behind disadvantaged black boys and 23% behind disadvantaged Asian girls in their phonics, for example; only around a third of white working-class boys pass their maths and English GCSEs; disadvantaged white working-class boys are 40% less likely to go into higher education than disadvantaged black boys; and in fact, according to UCAS, only 9% of these boys will go to university, compared with around half of the genera…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:43 PM
2

I posted this link about black men and said it was good etc. I then posted the link about in the UK which mentioned looking at issue of why white working class boys are doing so bad. I assumed your mention of white boys was in reference to that. I find it odd your hostility to addressing the issue of white working class boys doing awfully and bottom of the pile in multiple domains.... well not odd, I suspect you are a feminsits who uses a opressor opressed narrative, you can only see things in t…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:40 PM
2

Thank you! Toxic femininity is not attacking women, its gender roles. When you hear someone say women not reporting rape is toxic femininity, or women who are beaten up by patners toxix feminiity as societies gender roles seeing women as weak or not believeing women dont be offended, we are talking about society not women. Toxic feminity is women with eating disorders, gossiping, bitching, the wage gap is toxic feminiity? right?
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:35 PM
3

Thank you! Toxic femininity is not attacking women, its gender roles. When you hear someone say women not reporting rape is toxic femininity, or women who are beaten up by patners toxix feminiity as societies gender roles seeing women as weak or not believeing women dont be offended, we are talking about society not women. Toxic feminity is women with eating disorders, gossiping, bitching, the wage gap is toxic feminiity? right?
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:35 PM
1

Nope thats not a ban... thats your opinion which you are entirely free to say being downvoted by people who disagree with it. On a feminist sub you will be banned from every saying xyz in the first place. No one is censoring you. If you can provide a good arguement for toxic masculinity or whatever then go for it and you will change my mind. You should be allowed to say whatever you want (withing the confines of no calls to violence, hate, and other sub rules e.g. spam) and the goodness or shitn…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:32 PM
2

The UK does not have affirmative action in university (as you know it in the USA). What has racism got to do with it? When I said 13% of white working class boys go to hugher education compared to 65% of working class black boys... the issue is why are so few white working class boys going to unicersity... Why the hell are you bringin racism into it? Oh lets ignore the fact that nearly 9/10 white working class boys are not going to university beacuase its not univerity. You sound like a 14 year …
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:28 PM
1

"It's not due to racism. It's due to them being boys. As a white girl I face no racism due to my skin color. Neither do white boys." When you say youre a white girl I belive you... you sound 14 years old. Did you understand what I just said? In the UK the stats show white working class boys or white boys on welfare or white boys on free school meals COMPARED TO THOSE SAME BOYS who are black, indian, bangladehsi, etc are less likely to be literate, numerate, get worse grades, dont go to uni etc. …
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:26 PM
2

"White men can have it bad, but they don't have it as bad as minority men of the same SES. " Again can you actually read. We are looking at education and specifcally yes white men OF THE SAME SOCIO ECONOMIC CLASS specifically are doing the worse in the UK. Right, do you understand that? A white working class boy get worse grades than an indian boy, is ore likely to be illetrate, droup out, be excluded, less likely to go university, earns less, and so on. And white working class boys are also far…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:20 PM
8

Firstly Im a POC myself before you think im some white supremaciist.... can you read? Go up and read the article and the stats. In education white boys in the UK are specifaclly doing far worse than the equivialent black boys, indian boys, bengali boys etc. Ill say that gain white working class boys are at the BOTTOM of the pile in UK education.... do you get it?? Not black boys, in fact black boys are doing signicantly better than them, not indian boys, in fact Indians are doing the best in man…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:14 PM
9

Boys need encouragement ine eduction. Obviously I mean girls too, but the point is all resources and efforts have shifted only to girls... and even when boys are struggling, gynocentrism, male dispoablilty ​ October 2018 report by Department of education showed: For girls, half of parents thought it was very likely (50.4%) they would go to university while 3.2% thought it was not at all likely. In contrast, for boys, 39.0% of parents thought it was very likely they would go to university and 9.5…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:54 PM
7

You misunderstand the concept and are thinking a bit like a feminstis (there has to be an opressed - opressed, there has to be discrimination) In UK, by a substanaital margin white working class boys do worse in multiple domains. And hugely so.... that is a fact... look up the stats, and read above....soo THAT is the issue, the fact that they are doing so poorly, so why are you INSTEAD looking for who is discriminating them etc? The issue is how do you help them, your like ohh no there is no orp…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:47 PM
19

I wouldnt be that pessimistic. In fact they mention fatherlessness quite a lot and on the whole its good stuff. Its just occasionally yeah they will do all the feminist crap, which we need to watch out for. They are looking at good stuff e.g. increasing eucation outcomes, college rates, lowering exlcusion rates, dropout rates... we just need to be careful that they dont go down the patriarchy all men evil route.... which generally they dont Because its black men, they do tend to not blame men or…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:45 PM
5

Secondary school league table data just published by the BBC on 6 February confirms that England’s schoolboys have had worse exam results than girls for 30 years. Another notable fact, reported by Ally Fogg on the politics.co.uk website, is that among every ethnic group, boys perform markedly worse than girls. Among the most deprived children, that effect is greatest. Across the board, a girl from a free school meals background is now 52% more likely to go to university than her male equivalent.…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:32 PM
9

Obama had the My brothers keeper (MBK) and MBK alliance focusing on young men and boys of colour. https://www.obama.org/mbka2/mbk-6-years-photos/ Again same thing, im sure it had some good stuff but probably some feminsit black men die, women most affected stuff too In the UK they are looking closely now at white working class boys. Now this has been mentioned over the years so I was sceptical of actual action but this time it looks like they are more intereseted on doing something. It has got s…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:29 PM
3

Exactly. Thats why MRA groups like above need to form to lobby them back into shape (as they are as evidenced above). They are even countering the feminsits lies. The DV bill, some MRA group (I think the men and boys coalation) complained to government stastics obudsmun about false claims in the bill by feminsits and the ombusman agreed they were false (saying men are oberwhelming perps of coercive control) and told the report to remove the language. Just needs people lobbying Look at the report…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 01:09 PM
1

MBKA was specifcally aimed at boys and men. I read the actual reports and activities of JP morgans stuff and it did not seem as white ribbon grooming as you suggest at all which is what I was worried about. Of course that is the main problem with many of these initiaves - the feminists indoctrination of it.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 01:00 PM
1

You sound pathetic and need some self improvement stuff to sort yourself out. Wahh wahh men have it so bad. Men cant vote and men arent allowed into university and we have no hope of change no one listens to men. Oh wait that was women. You literally sound like a whiny feminsits or some tumblr feminsit. How is it a false claim? I looked into to it more its in fact a 1 billion dollar programme and there are even several more running into hundreds of millions, let alone the JP morgan one I mention…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 12:58 PM
1

No the initial report said to inclue men and women as a hate group class. Feminists then lobbied the shit out of it and said no we should only add misogyny. The law comission is now asking the public what it thinks (a normal process in legilslations).... the law comission is hinting at men and women and also not to call it misogyny but women. If people didnt spend all their time moaning like you on here and actually you know, did something like write letters wed get something done. Too many peop…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 12:54 PM
2

I dont mean its either or... of course activistm is needed but the voter base needs increasing. And voting definitely has a big role and is ultiamtely somthing that will have bog impact. Look at this US election, due to the chages in demographics Trump put a huge focus on black men, latinos, and going forward the republican party will do this. Andrew Yang was popular with men and this was recognised: https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/video/analysis-yangs-message-connecting-with-men-who-feel-forgotten…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/20 12:51 PM
1

Looks like Obama my brothers keeper had $600 million in resouces: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/my-brothers-keeper Would ave to look more into it exactly how they come to that number, but do that yourself. Go find JP morgan etc yourself and educate yourself about what is happening in MRA and contribute if you can instead of this defeatist attitude.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:44 AM
2

Bro you really need some self help stuff lsten to some Jordan Peterson about taking personal responsilbity... you sound bitter which is an awful thing for anyone and society. You also sound like there is some conspiracy against men and so on. Look dude, I know all about gynocnetrism and male dispoabiltiy and all the stats about men and women too, but despite all that, your thinking about how fucked men are is ridicolous and a bitter and whiny take on the world. You sound like a radical feminist …
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:41 AM
2

He has a youtube channel and posts videos all the time, he is on reddit too although I dont think often
/r/MGTOW215/11/20 02:28 AM
1

“Feminists often say anyone who isn’t a feminist is a sexist, anti-women, or just want women to lose all the rights they’ve gained. How do you respond to that?” Judith responded: “By rolling my eyes. There is no evidence that the women who reject feminism do so because they want their rights taken away. This is one of the most common misconceptions about anti or non feminist people. It’s a simplistic, black and white view of things that can only arise from someone so tribalistic that it prevents…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:25 AM
1

JP morgan literally have a programme pumping in nearly 100,000 million for men of colour. Its actually solid ive read their reports, its not even too tainited by feminsits idealogies or toxic masculinity bull although the leaders are all women (which is of course fine, in theory, I dont do identity politics, as long they are not feminist idealogues).... but then again, men don't tend to do much of that stuff for men. "I've seen individual cases of very violent women who abused their boyfriends g…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:19 AM
17

Women also vote for male candiadtes over women frequently as they know their interests are still taken into account by their chosen candiate (and suveys show this, women feel better repredented by their politicians than men do) This is actually a good point. A major MRA goal should be to get men to vote more which would automatically mean governments do policies for men. Much of the government neglect of mens issues or focus of womens issues at mens expense (obviously I fully support womens issu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/20 02:12 AM
0

Sorry I disagree entirely. Your basically saying don't talk about, highlight, analyse progress because its too small? And the real action is one the ground. There are tonnes of MRA organisations with very real, large, tanglible successes on national and international scale. If you don't know this, then its because you havent looked, theres MRA programmes with over 100 million in funding (corporate programmes for more POC boys to get into corporate america e.g. law firm, university, etc. and ther…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 01:39 AM
3

Firtly heres a pro at work dealing with this crap: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/another-victory-from-my-efforts-to-advance-civil-rights-and-challenge-systemic-sexism-in-higher-education-2/ 200 lawsuits and going and he keeps on winning. In fact Im sure hes taken on some type of case like this in unis. The main thing as Marc ACngelluci RIP says is you need a person to then base a case off. Feminists show their hypocriscy by saying hes taking away womens rights? WTF?? No he is making previously …
/r/MensRights14/11/20 08:37 PM
1

For the "society is rub for betterment of men" an example In UK when pensions were devised it was decided that men must work unti 65 and women until 60 to recieve a pension. Men already die 4-12 years younger, so even when retirement ages are equal men get significantly less retirement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/20 07:51 AM
6

https://www.mwwt.org.uk/scotlands-misogyny-bill/ The Law comission are currently accepting public viewpoints online and one of the specific actions they are covering is should it be women only, or women and men... also should it be called misogyny or just women
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:33 AM
5

Yeah but this made me chuckle. Vagina envy is a thing but as a sexual fetish by men. Narratives have to be set up so men are opressors and women are victims. Christina Hoff sommers when debating feminsits about their insistence of quotas (but only in e.g. STEM, as Christina points out why are you not going into departments e.g. veterny medicine and saying we will only hire men) is a power grab by elite highly privelged women who want more power and use talk of opression and injustice and especia…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/20 06:06 AM
3

Oh they are not real measures at all. People have an outcome they want and then they decide how to get it. I gave the example of Gender Equality index used by UN. They knew that in the health domain obviously women are going to do far better than men (women outlive men by 4-12 years across countries, 2% of countries have a mens health policy, 100% have a womens, 14/15 leading causes of death are male, 2/3 preventable deaths are men, 94% of work fatalieis in USA, 9/10 murders etc. 3/4 of suicides…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:02 AM
1

I dont see this whole issue as that big of a deal. However, I will make one correction to your statement. So in UK yes sexual assualt carries the same maximum sentence so a woman can get the same sentence as rape. However, it does not carry the same minimum sentence as rape. As you correctly point out though, the actual reality of will it actually be charged is the main thing, not if its called rape or not. And yes women raping men is far less common that men raping women, unless you apply the f…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 02:04 AM
8

Its very important for people to realise what the intention here is. This is a very organised effort to take feminism into its next phase. This is a collective effort by her and a few other feminsits to make critiscism of feminism (which is not only an idealogy but a POLITICAL idealogy too) seen as misogyny and more importantly ILLEGAL (femiinists are trying to pass the migogyny bill making misogyny but specically misandry not illegal - they specifically are campaigning for misandry NOT to be in…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:55 AM
27

Its very important for people to realise what the intention here is. This is a very organised effort to take feminism into its next phase. This is a collective effort by her and a few other feminsits to make critiscism of feminism (which is not only an idealogy but a POLITICAL idealogy too) seen as misogyny and more importantly ILLEGAL (femiinists are trying to pass the migogyny bill making misogyny but specically misandry not illegal - they specifically are campaigning for misandry NOT to be in…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:54 AM
35

Its very important for people to realise what the intention here is. This is a very organised effort to take feminism into its next phase. This is a collective effort by her and a few other feminsits to make critiscism of feminism (which is not only an idealogy but a POLITICAL idealogy too) seen as misogyny and more importantly ILLEGAL (femiinists are trying to pass the migogyny bill making misogyny but specically misandry not illegal - they specifically are campaigning for misandry NOT to be in…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:53 AM
3

Its very important for people to realise what the intention here is. This is a very organised effort to take feminism into its next phase. This is a collective effort by her and a few other feminsits to make critiscism of feminism (which is not only an idealogy but a POLITICAL idealogy too) seen as misogyny and more importantly ILLEGAL (femiinists are trying to pass the migogyny bill making misogyny but specically misandry not illegal - they specifically are campaigning for misandry NOT to be in…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:53 AM
1

Good sattire of feminsits logic, thats exactly the type of reasoning they use. The feminsits approach to gender equality is highly ineffective and for mens issues it should be completely discounted. It applies "trickle down equality" to any issues affecting men. https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/trickle-down-equality-and-framing-mens-issues-as-really-being-about-women/ Read the full article, its excellent, but here are some highlights: There is a widespread tendency within feminism…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:41 AM
2

A PHD on the matter above (the absurd legal system/ mini legal system i.e. gender violence courts): https://justiciadegenero.com/en/espana-la-igualdad-de-genero-las-leyes-de-violencia-y-su-cumplimiento-del-convenio-europeo-de-derechos-humanos-un-caso-de-discriminacion-positiva-de-los-hombres/ its so shocking when I learnt about it I simply could not believe it was true in Europe, I had to ask lawyers, hey is this actually true
/r/MGTOW13/11/20 07:23 PM
4

Yup. Even if you can just get audio it can change a lot. I was in a similar situation, but this was about 17 years ago. My state of the art flip phone still had a green screen, T9 texting, cameras in phones were only a dream at this point. I was trying to leave a shitty situation and the girl immediately starting losing her shit a lot like this girl here. Accusations left and right, when we were literally just sitting in her room and somehow she just flipped. She was trying to make me stay and w…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/20 02:40 PM
6

Yup. Even if you can just get audio it can change a lot. I was in a similar situation, but this was about 17 years ago. My state of the art flip phone still had a green screen, T9 texting, cameras in phones were only a dream at this point. I was trying to leave a shitty situation and the girl immediately starting losing her shit a lot like this girl here. Accusations left and right, when we were literally just sitting in her room and somehow she just flipped. She was trying to make me stay and w…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/20 02:40 PM
2

If this was Spain the man (and only the man, the legislation does NOT apply to a woman doing the exact same thing to a man or another woman or a man to a man) would have been immediately arrested (despite video etc) and JAILED and THEN after 48 hours would face a hearing. Yes guilty before innocent. Her verbal claims would be full evidience (but spedcifically not HIS, for his, the normal standard of evidence has to be used) As they use this system here in Spain see video and PHD below (literally…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/20 02:36 PM
3

If this was Spain the man (and only the man, the legislation does NOT apply to a woman doing the exact same thing to a man or another woman or a man to a man) would have been immediately arrested (despite video etc) and JAILED and THEN after 48 hours would face a hearing. Yes guilty before innocent. Her verbal claims would be full evidience (but spedcifically not HIS, for his, the normal standard of evidence has to be used) As they use this system here in Spain see video and PHD below (literally…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/20 02:36 PM
3

I will point out this is in Spain. the man is EXTREMELY lucky she was caught out and he didnt get convicted (he did go to jail) as they use this system here in Spain see video and PHD below (literally the ULTIME pussy pass - I mean its so shocking I didnt believe it I had to ask 6 lawyers, look this legal system cant be true right? It is [details in PHD, you wont belive it - the ultimate pussy pass) https://youtu.be/-9rCcveEDaw Heres a PHD on it. https://justiciadegenero.com/en/espana-la-igualda…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/20 02:28 PM
12

Draft, circumcision
/r/MensRights13/11/20 12:22 PM
6

Well being male is considered a bad thing in some progessive ciricles especially old white male, even white male, and now even male is an insult.... and of course we know the term MRA is literally an insult, its like calling someone a racist. And bad baheviour is associated with masculinity. E.g. any problems with Trump is masculinty. Any problems with politicians is masculinity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 12:16 PM
1

And the NCFM got the male only selective service ruled unconstitutional. Men have been successful in stopping universities from offering female only coding camps and things like that. When you do things like feminists did them, you get what feminists got. Which is to have people listen to you so they don't end up in court. Yes Mark Perry is killing it, did over 200 lawsuits and counting, keeps winning... stuff like that is best route for MRA. Marc Angelucci RIP too. Listened to his interviews, h…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:29 AM
2

That is certainly the public perception. Also that MRAs blame feminsim on all of mens problems (which they acknoweldge exis).... then there is camp who think the same i.e. MRAs blame feminism on all of mens problems (which do NOT exist and are all class and race issues if that)... and of course most common is.... MRA? WTF is that? Mens rights advocate? Huh??? for what?
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:12 AM
1

If you want to help, I think the best thing you can do at 14 is make the best person you can out of yourself first, get those grades up, get yourself fit, get a part time job and work your bag off, and find your personal passion and throw what you can into it. Great advice..... get your house in order. Build a good base... if more people followed that advice they wouldnt fall to radicalisation
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:08 AM
2

Yeah Reddit and Tumblr dont have great UI's! The fullstop typo was cos I couldnt get formatting on my browser so just wrote new reply.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:37 AM
4

They are mainly people who have had a lack of good male role models in their lives and also young women who are frankly being radicalised by tumblr type feminsm, alot have other issues too self esteem, eating disorders, anxiety, depression etc. Then there is a group who have actively had things happen e.g. abusive dads, sexual abuse etc. Again get sucked into tumblr type stuff. Its sad so many people in society are like that. ​ They're 'mainstream' feminists. In fact, the vast majority of them d…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:34 AM
4

A major goal of MRA should be to make gender equality actually mean gender equality at the moments its just synoynm for womens issues. If that happens then we can all be egalatrians and deal with issues properly from a human rights framework not all the feminstis idealogy. Yes I agree, too much focus on feminism, need more work doing advocay here. E.g. writing emails, letters etc. Posting postive stuff. Menslib is full of shite, and I have many problems with it but sometimes its got some good mo…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:19 AM
7

Great summary. Its a zero sum game in terms of funding hence their tactics. This isnt unique to feminism, the entire charity secotor is like this, e.g. suicide charaties are in competition with eachother and why charaties use propaganda type stats. The only difference is in feminism, often the people at the lower levels really believe they are the righteoous ones. Very good point about toxic masculinity. The only reason feminist have some interest in male suicide (vs the typical approach by femi…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:16 AM
5

It took several decades and mainly comes from gender studies in university. That is the engine. From there feminstis go in to juornalism, blogging, media, politics, social work, charity sector, advocay groups etc. There are plenty of groups pushing back on this. E.g. Look up James Lindsey, New discourses etc, of course Jordan Peterson was a huge existential threat to them before he got unwell. People are too pessimistic, progress countering their rubbish is being made steadily and well. And MRA …
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:03 AM
4

They are just a tiny minority of people. Most women love men and most men love women. It usually is daddy issues, and not having a good male role models around them. Your of course entirely valid feeling like that, from my POV though its just a bunch of hateful people, I genuinely feel sorry for them, they are going to struggle with anxiety, angst, general low life unhappiness (or maybe full out depression) their whole life, I really do feel sorry for them and hope they can get better
/r/MensRights13/11/20 01:58 AM
2

And did I skim over the part of your comment where you discussed the point I made? what do you mean? Do you mean the full stop reply post? That was a typo post
/r/MensRights13/11/20 01:52 AM
50

Defintely some pussy pass in here https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, "men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do," and "[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted." This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/20 01:50 AM
11

I will point out this is in Spain. the man is EXTREMELY lucky she was caught out and he didnt get convicted (he did go to jail) as they use this system here in Spain see video and PHD below (literally the ULTIME pussy pass - I mean its so shocking I didnt believe it I had to ask 6 lawyers, look this legal system cant be true right? It is [details in PHD, you wont belive it - the ultimate pussy pass) https://youtu.be/-9rCcveEDaw Heres a PHD on it. https://justiciadegenero.com/en/espana-la-igualda…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/20 01:47 AM
1

"Yes, I agree generally with what you say. However, I think there are other factors besides feminist theory at play here. I don't think feminists came along and totally changed people's entire world views about whether or not to extend empathy and concern to females rather than males. It also would help to analyze whether this is an ongoing, organic state of affairs that perhaps was helpful in humanity's continued survival for much of history. We can't fight things unless we know exactly what we…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 01:43 AM
1

.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 01:25 AM
1

Im extremely happy you found use in the article bro. Stay strong, keep winning. You might like some work by Tony Robbins, Paul Mckenna (his I can make you series are easy to read, very straight to the point and cheap), Eckhart Tolle
/r/MensRights13/11/20 01:23 AM
1

Change is happening. Check out https://www.amhf.org.au/ A country that actually has a mens health policy. They are just finishing publishing their major national research project on mens health. 1st chapter released which you can read was on mens health. Male pscyholgy network is also growing. I follow the overall situation on MRM closely, things are definetly progressing In the UK they're even looking at the underachieving groups and Ive been following the actual meetings and transcripts, theyv…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:10 PM
2

Male health is most certainly under researched, under funded or even a thing.... both from a biological point of view i.e. the science behind it, but more so in terms of how services are delivered or pubic health policies. I posted a link here some time ago about how the top 14/15 causes of death are male yet CDC departments only exist for women. Or here Australis accident reduction policy was entirely gender neutral: https://www.amhf.org.au/accidentally_left_out_government_injury_strategy_ignor…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 08:51 PM
37

Biden is awful. He is as as establishment, washington, swamp, corporate, lobbyist, elitist, career politician, fully of slimey deals, power plays, bougt and paid for, as you can get. I particularly dislike his habit of saying whatever sounds good to the person in from of him to win them over and the exact opposite to do a different group... a thing many politicians do, but one he does a lot He will also likely allow more extreme feminist elements to foster and pass and also make university even …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 04:18 PM
7

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/2020-update-for-every-100-girls-part-iii/
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:35 PM
1

"I thought MRA would also want to be led by men, as men are most likely to have first hand, intimate understanding of their suffering." You wont find that to a huge extent on MRA (you will on MGTOW, but that isnt MRA at all, in fact its sort of the opposite, MGTOW is leaving society MRA is changing it) and certainly you would not find it in the actual areas where MRAs do have "power" i.e organisations or MRA academics which are full of women in leadership roles, and probably actually disproprtio…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 12:48 PM
3

With the uni thing, I forgot to say, his propsoal "women are the main priority etc" etc etc all taht (you can see his full statement online) was said before but despite that it got banned (for reference the uni has inernational womens WEEK). "This isn't sexism. It's just our way of verifying the genuineness of someone's argument by assessing their motive." I agree with what you said. I didn't make my original point clear. I mean women can criticise feminism more freely (although they will still …
/r/MensRights12/11/20 12:34 PM
12

Also: https://newdiscourses.com/2020/06/reasons-critical-race-theory-terrible-dealing-racism/ Critical Race Theory… ​ believes racism is present in every aspect of life, every relationship, and every interaction and therefore has its advocates look for it everywhere relies upon “interest convergence” (white people only give black people opportunities and freedoms when it is also in their own interests) and therefore doesn’t trust any attempt to make racism better is against free societies and wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 10:52 AM
2

"I’m also still under the full belief that firing her is a useless gesture. It doesn’t bring any justice to Deep and only serve for the public to vindicate anger towards her, instead of sympathy towards Deep." Yes I agree. She should however be rightly heavily criticised (which to an extent she is, just not by the same mainstream people who did so on Depp and so on)
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:51 AM
9

The reason CRT is extremly racist to everyone black, white, and everyone is it CENTRES race on every single human interaction... it is the opposite of Martin Luther Kings judge someone by the content of their character. It is incredibly hateful and dangerous movement as it has real beaurcratic power This 8 min vid explains it by an expert, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXihpfkG020 or shall I say a legend in the area... he studied it and succesfully created troll articles to fool CRT and gender…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 10:46 AM
11

No I wouldn't say so at all. Both men and women have different easy mode and hard mode things. And within groups men and women things are very mixed. For exmaple, I certainly have things on easy mode (nearly all issues I raise will never even apply to me) as do many men and do many women. The main probelm is we as a society only think women have issues and men are on easy mode as you say (which is the core doctrine of feminism which is why as an idealogy it fails as everything it produces comes …
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:41 AM
3

That said, although I think men's rights should be championed by men, I still think men will benefit from women's support (NOT using existing feminist theory however). I mean just that women should want to support men as allies. This is the difference between MRA and feminism. Women are not "allies" in MRA, they are full members. You judge people based on merit or lack thereof what they said not immutable characteristics. Why would it make a difference if the speaker of said ideas is a man or a …
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:24 AM
1

If you don't believe in cancel culture, but suddenly do for AH, then yes thats acting in vengence or at least its inconsistent. Im saying those people who do believe in cancel culture, so they do believe she should be cancelled for her beahaviour (e.g. on >>audio tape<< clearly admitting she abused Johnny Depp physically and mentally and then told him that go on, say that you are a victim, no one will believe you).... saying let not cancel her and get justice for JD instead, well it doesn't work…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 09:59 AM
74

And contact WB to let them know why you are not using a product. Also some tweets, etc. Its like on Family Guy that joke if 2 people actually bother to write a letter of compaint that they don't like something that means 10 million people didnt like it IRL
/r/MensRights12/11/20 09:48 AM
1

No i don't mean you personally, I mean saying lets not cancel her as that revenge etc, is a valid arguement for people who don't blieve in cancel culture, so I agree with you on that front.... what I am saying though is that for those who do believe in cancel culture or don't know/ neutral stance/ never bothered to think about... then cancelling amber heard is logical thing to do as JD was cancelled and the thats vengence arguement doesnt apply
/r/MensRights12/11/20 09:46 AM
8

Oh yeah, I just meant that is number one thing said, if you try and raise issue of gender life expectancy gap (I mean thats barely even a term, really, we aren't used to hearing male disadvantgae talked about in MSM in gendered language)... "yeah cos men don't go dr"... simialrl with gender gaps in education "boys are lazy etc." vs any female thing is literally society is at fault entirely
/r/MensRights12/11/20 09:43 AM
2

Im looking for it now. Try googling: "title ix black men" top results all relevant, im trying to find which specific article I saw, but all these look good
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 09:35 AM
7

yes that is a good point but thats if you don't belive in cancel culture. Of course if you don't mind cancel culture (which many don't) than AH getting cancelled is what you'd expect in keeping with your acceptance of cancel culture.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 09:31 AM
11

check out aus mens health org website, one of only 4 countries in the world that actually has somewhat of a mens health policy: https://www.amhf.org.au/is_male_behaviour_putting_mens_lives_at_risk I am an individualist and think people should always empower themselves first, before looking outward at society. While that is still true, what you said above is off the mark a little in some ways. New born babies dying etc is genetic reason e.g. more males are born with genetic conditions etc. Solvin…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 09:27 AM
16

From the article: If Biden were to turn back the clock on Title IX and due process, it would be somewhat ironic, since the president-elect has himself been accused of inappropriate behavior and arguably benefiting from the sort of presumption of innocence that was gravely threatened under the guidance issued by the Obama administration. As I noted after Tara Reade came forward with her allegation, it's quite likely Biden would have been found guilty if the case had been judged under the standard…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:36 AM
23

I think he banned specifically CRT, not diversity training. CRT is not anti-racism, anti-sexism, it is a highly deangerous >idealogy< and is initself incredibly racists and sexist
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:31 AM
16

Its also massively disproprtionately black men... I'll try and find article in some campuses its like 80% black men accused. It is unlikely to be due to more offences by black men too, its thought to be things like interrcial male and female, where black male, and more likely false accusations due to racial stigma (a large proportion of false rape accusations are due to things like e.g. caught cheating so rape accusation or to avoid slut shaming, which more likely to do if its a black man you ca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:30 AM
3

If gender equality mean gender eqaulity than when looking at the issue of TV, media etc we would address both sides e.g. men and womens portryal. As it stands gender equality means womens rights/issues only. That in itself would only be half bad, what is even worse is that it doesnt end there.... feminsits went further to say either mens issues do not exists, although this is far less now then in the past as many acknolwedge the existence (large swathes do not, and even feminsits leaders or ones…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:43 AM
3

This has changed now, but not too long ago if a woman was punched in a movie, it was usually off camera (i.e. youd see her reaction but not actually being hit) while mens beatings would be fully graphic and of course methodica or graphic torture on cinema is almost only male victims. That would be down to male dispoability and gynocentrism. Of course a feminsts would say, actually no people being far more likely to assualt men or in this case show it on screen and also to celebrate it e.g. https…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:36 AM
2

And I forgot to source what I meant when I said feminism already has far more funding, hence I don't address those issues as these are already covered by others. https://ycantboysbeboys.com/blogs/news/no-money-for-men-the-truth-behind-giving (gender spending in the entire charity sector) https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/wales-gives-77-times-much-11780326 The 0.5% of UK funding going to male DV despite government own stats saying 800,000 male victims a year etc. Even at the UN level: h…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 02:07 AM
3

I forgot to add, equity feminism e.g. Christina Hoff Sommers is one option. Here is her great factual feminsit series. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLytTJqkSQqtr7BqC1Jf4nv3g2yDfu7Xmd The problem is most feminists dont consider her femnist, and this is how they treat her attempts to speak: https://youtu.be/_tXBjotKcME Thats a law school too! Those peopel are going to be lawyers!! Anti feminst Karen Straughan on the other hand, takes a different view, she answers this feminists question, …
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:51 AM
3

I personally go with gender egalatrian. It is more specific than egalatrian so it makes it obvious you are looking at a specific thing. It also makes it clear you are not using the feminist framework overall in order to do this, nor an MRA one. Sure you may use things from feminism but it is a clear rejetion of feminism as being the sole tool in which gender should be examined. I know use ther term MRA a little as it makes it obvious for OTHER people but really I dont think I am. I am an egalatr…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 12:29 AM
4

Great point. We have to also understand the politics of movements too. I have seen feminsits who actually say they agree with male disposablity but said they are wary of talking about it or discussing it or even acknowledging it as it could lead people into MRA With this trickle down approach you have many different types of feminsits. You have feminsits who know exactly what they are doing and so use it knowing its bull. Then you have feminsits who actually believe it as they are idealogically …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 11:22 PM
3

Another common one is when discussing quotas... I am generally agaainst quotas but lets take a neutral stance for now, Im referring to the more absurd quotas. e.g. the Dutch university that said no men are allowed to apply for 6 months (then if it works 5 years) for all professor posts and women hired will geta 150,000 euro bonus for career etc. Now obviously huge amount of public said WTF (although doesnt matter as the loud 1% are fine in pushing their agenda even though 99% think its dumb and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 11:04 PM
8

Caroline Norton created this. Its absurd and telling of how ill informed and stupid feminists are by claiming female custody is really about patriarchy... giving the kids to the mother is literally the OPPOSITE of patriarchy (rule by father where the father should own the kids)... you cant make it up. Another common one is thinking FGM is a patriachal pracice when it is iiterally a matriachal practice held up by powerful matriachs in societiies and it is women cutting women with men largely igno…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 10:59 PM
27

https://arcdigital.media/johnny-depp-and-the-other-side-of-domestic-violence-7954dfd3b89c https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/hollywood-still-doesnt-care-that-amber-heard-is-an-admitted-domestic-abuser/
/r/MensRights11/11/20 01:25 PM
2

Its important to point out that Mary P Koss is not some random feminsit, she is immensely powerful and influential in her field of sexual assulat and has shaped ACTUAL laws on rape, sexual assulat, domestic violence. So those views she has actually lead to real results. "Feminist extremists have appropriated its meaning and now are a symbol of anti-men hate." I agree here, but I think the main problem with feminsm isn't even the anti-male hate. Feminism ironically has an anti woman hate issue to…
/r/MensRights11/11/20 01:10 PM
2

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/wales-gives-77-times-much-11780326 Apparently for every £3.44 (around $4) that is spent on womens group $0.04 is spent on mens groups. The funding, and of course the focus and attention of gender equality or any issue is very much one way. This would very much be the in ilne with the approach to dealing with issues of teaching/school/education and gender equality issues. Many individual schools have erased the gender gap in education entirely. This sch…
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:16 PM
2

Which is basically the MRA view, or basically any non collectivist approach, and which is exactly the problem with collectivist movements as they do the oppisite of what you just said.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 04:58 AM
3

Well yeah of course. Thats why we need to support the legal system and due process and so on.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 04:57 AM
11

Here: https://twitter.com/LisaBritton?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Boys need the encouragement: As UCAS have repeatedly pointed out, if every male who applied to full-time undergraduate education entered, there would still be more women than men starting each year.1By the main UCAS deadline of mid-January 2016, 343,930 women and 249,790 men had applied – a difference of 94,140.2 This difference between application rates from men and women is the highest on record. Octob…
/r/MensRights11/11/20 04:51 AM
21

"The quietly rational feminists (who don't argue on reddit) don't subscribe to the theory that feminism will solve all the problems of everyone." Again strawman... they take ownership of any discussion of gender and of "gender equality".... gender equality really shouldnt even be called gender equality and should just be called womens issues.... For example. The UN gender equality index. Measures gender equality right? Oh wait.... https://youtu.be/-6N-wdMu7J0 [TL:DR 49% female is sexism. 100% fe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 04:38 AM
17

"Don't look at the radicals and paint everyone with that brush." Your arguing with yourself. That wasn't said apart from by you now. "The quietly rational feminists (who don't argue on reddit) don't subscribe to the theory that feminism will solve all the problems of everyone." I could not care less about quiet rational feminsits or feminists on reddit. The only feminsits I care about are feminsits with beauricratic power and who shape and create policy who do think these things and then those f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 04:32 AM
23

Plenty of feminists say that feminism will directly solve mens issues. But that was less of the point, the point was that they either on their own or to trying and shut down anyone talking about a mens issue (not even an MRA) will say actually the cause of this is misogyny. Forced conscription in e.g. Switzerland, Finland etc being one. Or male DV, or criminal justice system. The gender flipped examples show how ridicolous that is: ​ The problems with this practice (that feminsits do, and as a r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 04:13 AM
1

Its the problem with being an idealogue. From Judith the anti feminist: I also see this as an ideological person incapable of observing reality for what it is. That’s the danger of ideological possession. People like that are looking for easy excuses instead of taking the time to understand. Because if they did, they might discover feminism isn’t as perfect as they think it is and that we might have a point in criticizing it.” “The typical idea of a hate movement would be the Ku Klux Klan. Peopl…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/20 04:05 AM
2

No not at all, you are the exact opposite of that. Im saying that is the approach to gender equality currently employed. We will not see more male teachers, as the fact that there is 70% of people entering teaching courses to become teachers is female and also male dropout rates are higher is not of concern, we should instead focus on more women on STEM... I don't mean that as a rant, (you cant tell tone online) I mean that is exactly the actual policies employed (there are little to no schemes …
/r/MensRights11/11/20 04:00 AM
2

More men in teaching could be achieved if "gender equality" actually meant gender equality... instead gender eqaulity means all focus needs to go on more women in STEM (but only the STEM women are underrepresented in) And why we need more gender balance in teachers: https://www.reddit.com/r/UnpopularFacts/comments/ght5dj/teachers_mark_girls_higher_for_identical_work_to/ And yes feminists are already saying that boys being marked lower for identical work (primarily by female teachers preferring f…
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:24 AM
3

Here everything you need to know, sourced and cited: https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2017/01/29/justice-system-discrimination-and-the-myth-that-sexism-against-men-isnt-institutional/ This is a little off the path, but here is an extreme example: https://justiciadegenero.com/en/espana-la-igualdad-de-genero-las-leyes-de-violencia-y-su-cumplimiento-del-convenio-europeo-de-derechos-humanos-un-caso-de-discriminacion-positiva-de-los-hombres/
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:22 AM
4

https://youtu.be/cHhVyeHRxWk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pz_Y7XVWIw
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:09 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/hhwyz5/the_un_is_responsible_for_hundreds_of_thousands/
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:07 AM
10

lol no, UN and WHO are linking giving money and food aid and medicine to circumcision uptake in areas. Areas where they are refusing circumcision or is low are not getting food aid. As a result, these mobs are going around cutting men
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:04 AM
6

The intactivist community is very succesful and also generally good vibes good people, see them online e.g. bloodstained men. Excellent support by men and women from all backgrounds. Some really dedicated indiiduals going all out full time too.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:02 AM
3

Oh boy your in for a surpsie. Circucmision aside, the systematic sexual torture of men e.g. in prisons, political prisoners etc is extremely common as it mass systematic male rape e.g. africa, and also forcing men to rape their children etc in wars..... of course for women also e.g. rape, mutilation etc.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:00 AM
6

Good for you. The hundreds of thousands of boys and men who have died, had penises amputated, suffered issues or estimated millions of men who are restoring their foreskin do see it as wrong.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 11:55 PM
3

no obviously not, UN and WHO are linking giving money and food aid and medicine to circumcision uptake in areas. Areas where they are refusing circumcision or is low are not getting food aid. As a result, these mobs are going around cutting men
/r/MensRights10/11/20 11:49 PM
3

Circumcision was not brought from the west to the Africa. Quite the opposite. The WHO and the UN however are on a massive circumcision promotion policy and have done and will do tens of millions of circumcisions. Do some research. They are even inventing devices to make it possible and safer etc in africa.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 11:48 PM
5

"Not everything unique to a man is a privilege." Well the opposite is a common/popular feminsits view point and this view has trickled into popular culture i.e. everyday people. The problem is though this is feminist in power not random internet people. When what would have been the UKs first welfare officer was brought in, feminsts campaigned to have him removed. The specific comment from the National Union of Students Women was that men face no sexism (when you see the example of Switzerland b…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 08:47 AM
0

Yeah that guy sues them (he also sues unis if they offer men only programmes and equal opps to women in something of a similar amount) and has sued hundreds of cases so far. Yeah its actually mainly the majority dominated subjects that were worst. I found some figures: "As UCAS (thats the UK's national university application body) have repeatedly pointed out, if every male who applied to full-time undergraduate education entered, there would still be more women than men starting each year.1By th…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 08:26 AM
2

If you want quick uni stats look at for every 100 girls... https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/chart-of-the-day-for-every-100-girls-women/ Look at the education ones in particular. Perry has made a few. It is a trend. For 30 years and GROWING. In UK 30,000 more girls per year are going to university and growing. In USA Perry had an inforgraphic I cant remember the number but it was something massive like 800,000 more women have degrees than men since 20 years or whatever... point is yes it is a trend…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 08:08 AM
2

" However to suggest this money was spent disproportionely on women’s mental health because it was consciously blocked by individuals seeking to undermine the ‘patriarchy’, and not just due to a lack of mainstream awareness and activism, is I think unfounded" In this case it certainly is unfounded as it was not due to individual efforts. An example of actual full blown feminism and patrairchy etc twisting funding is DV where 0.5% in 2006 to 2012 went to men as a direct result of their actions (i…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 07:56 AM
4

Im going full ciricle here to your original OP in your thread about your BF's viewpoints.... The issue with this marxist type idea of opressed-opressor model of patriarchy is that it creates the common feminists viewpoint (which more problematically has seeped into popular culture) of: basically what your boyfriend said or if you talk about about homelessness or education (or the one that does it the most for feminsts) e.g. men far more likely to be vicrims of murder or any violent crime apart f…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 07:31 AM
7

"The pendulum has swung too far in favour of women in this case. It needs to change." Two things can exist at the same time, which is the nuance that many feminsits don't see in discussing patriarchy theory. In response to what you have said here, yes in some ways yes the pendulum has swung too far but thats not to say that women don't face a myriad of issues and challenges in this area too. The reality is that traditional roles and gender expectations harm men and women because society was not …
/r/MensRights10/11/20 07:16 AM
3

"But don’t you think that we USED to be a patriarchy in the way they describe?" THe nuance in my point is that I don't dispute the individual things you mention that described a patriachy in the past (although some things commony cited are factual incorrect e.g. domestic violence or rape was never condoned or legal in the way feminst paint) . I am just saying the reason behind it is not patriarchy (a system by men to advantage men and supress women etc). For example, obesity is not caused by rac…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 06:40 AM
2

Thanks for the link. I undertsand what you are saying, but as I said earlier, this "opinion piece" will not translate into policy largely due to feminism turnng all issues of gender equality only about women. (and then blame patraicchy for why mens issues are not raised) What I think you are on board with and what I am on board with (and why I left being only a feminist which I was but I suport the idea of feminists like you who look to change this... but lets be frank that will be hard) was gen…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 06:22 AM
3

Of course the things e.g. property etc are not good for women. However you are not seeing both sides... men "owned" that property (I mean 94% of peopel lived in absolute poverty) but were also legally responsible for women and children and would be jailed or beaten if they did not look after them. In fact mant suffragettes used this and divorced women purposefully took debts on and didnt pay or didnt pay their mortgatges knowing the debt would mean their husband would go to jail. WOmen had it mi…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 06:08 AM
6

A really "real life" tangible affect of beleiving in this patraichy narrative is the laws it creates. Because of beliving in patraichy the following was created. Feminists in Spain created a gender law that is so awful and sexist that I did not belive it and literally had to ask 6 spanish lawyers to confirm it was true since it is obvious that it breaks the Human rights convention of eqauality before the law. https://youtu.be/-9rCcveEDaw 106 courts are set up that ONLY see men. In this nationwid…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 05:50 AM
3

The point is though in these quotas you wouldnt for example have quotas for boys. I know you probably would support something like this but feminstis would actively and succesfully campaign aginst this (and have done so). In fact even regarding the poor educational attainment of boys in primary and secondary school and the over drugging as well as exclusion rates feminsits have even succesfully campaigned against taking an approach that considers boys and said that general measures shiould be ta…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 05:29 AM
11

Kate Millet is a keystone in modern feminism. She is attributed as one of the founders of modern day patraichy theory. To be clear, most of the issues and inequlaities you discuss in patraichy I would probably agree, however, the point is they are not the reason for this phenomenan. Patriachy is a nebolous catch all trying to apply to everything when many other things explain the individual matters. For example male dispoability could explain conscription, or as a feminsits you could use patriac…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 05:10 AM
2

Quotas in education don't actually apply though to the groups it needs to go, and you've picked a fine example to show the problem with feminism as it opposes the following. Feminsits would lose their shit if men were to recieve any boosts in education (this is not specifulation look at the examples below) So in the USA women receive $12BILLION per year more in government aid for education. And 94% of gender scholarships are for women only. Great right? I mean no problem women are disadvantaged …
/r/MensRights10/11/20 04:54 AM
7

I was a feminsits for a long time. Let me explain a point that is lost on many feminsits. MRA don't care about flat earth theorists... however, if flat earth theorist controlled science policy then there is a problem. MRA have an issue with an idealogy existing called feminism. The issue is that it is actively campaigning against men (I will cite this, real examples one sec)... and all MRAs are doing is talking about that where necessary they aren't trying to censor feminsits or ban them (only f…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 04:45 AM
2

Please do. Its a great example of solid MRA. Great approach. Good reports on their, e.g. check out their one about how suicide prevention stragety and also the one about injury precention stratgey are both neglecting men Look at this: https://www.amhf.org.au/accidentally_left_out_government_injury_strategy_ignores_men this is the kind of report that well funded feminsits orgs put out, which is what mens issues needs. The language used in the report is non controverisal and very difficult for any…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 04:33 AM
7

Men and women have myriad issues and continue to this day. Women face tonnes of issues and always have. Men do too. Neither are opressed btw in the west... I mean I could see an arguement for why both are opressed, which I dont buy, but to claim women alone are opressed is an absurd proposition. However, the idea patriarchy explaining these phenomenan is rubbish. Patrirachy is a nebolous concept that is a conspiarcy theory. Its a catch all (and feminsits have used it for ALL reasons e.g. snow is…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 04:20 AM
2

An example of feminsits taking an issue and instead of looking at it wholistically create a women only narrative: A great example is the current proposal in the UK to add gender as a factor for hate crimes... feminists radically opposed this and said ONLY misogyny should be added and SPECFICALLY campaigned for misandry not to be. This is just a typica example. Feminism focusing on only women is absolutely fine. However, they are NOT doing that they are actively trying to bring men down (and that…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 01:23 AM
2

And of course the counter to that is also literally all good in world was created by men e.g. in 1800's average life expectacny was 30 around the world and 90% of the world was in absolute poverty (it is now 8% and rapidly falling towards 0)... free speech, democracy, every bit of technology. feminism makes no sense, its arguements are stupid
/r/MensRights08/11/20 08:29 PM
2

That feminist arguement literally makes no sense. Hypothetically, if true (it isnt true either anyway, unless the feminsits is claiming women have 0 contribution to society and are responsible for nothing and men have built and done everything) it would mean you are saying male victims are the same as male perps.... effecively "your skirt was short so you deserved to be raped" type arguement... but even worse, its literally saying a male victim is at fault simply for being existing as a male. Mo…
/r/MensRights08/11/20 08:27 PM
4

excellent post, this is the kind of stuff I want from this forum. Maybe add more studies. ​ Check out this playlists from these guys, heavy debunk videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhm_HZ9twMg&list=PLytTJqkSQqtpiuvMX5E2LY7jfjEzl2TmV&index=10 ​ Only 4 mins or so a vid, you might end up with more ideas for posts.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:49 AM
1

Nice job, add some quotation marks bro, maybe italics and remove the cursor! ​ Maybe Norwe... position on making conscription gender neutral:
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:39 AM
1

1st wave and 2nd wave had specific legal aims. There were elements of misadnry in them and a hell a of a lot of classisim and racism, but ultimately misandry was only an element. The focus was very much on empowering women, making them seem as competeant as possibel. 3rd wave is entirely different. Misnadry is central and core in a way it never was before. Women now have full LEGAL rights, they then focus specifcally on attacking masculinaty and also focus on the patriacrhy and the idea that wom…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 11:10 PM
1

Oh watch ir at like 1.75 speed. Oh hell yeah its different set of traits entirely. In women its things like queen bee syndrome, theres this rope one as well, women get to the top by climbing a rope and then take the rope away so next person cant, levels of emotional abuse, jealousy, manipulation etc..... all these cited wirh evidence and examples of how they lead to violence and are not harmless As I said, gendering this shit, even though it is way more female behaviours is not helpful in my eye…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 10:39 PM
1

Do you not find it really annoying to get the toilet paper to stick on the seat. Maybe Im not doing it right. Plus its annoying how thin and cheap public bathroom toilet paper is.. obviously gotta keep costs down. I am quite suprised you didnt know about women hovering. The only thing I can think of is maybe its a country thing. I am talking about this is common in North America, bits of europe (that I know of dont know mosy europe) Also i really do not get why most european countreis do not use…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 10:35 PM
1

Most countries dont have that seat protector, which is dumb if you ask me I dont get why most dont. Also why dont all countries have bidets shower things. Anyway, lol you need to ask 10 women. Virtually all women squat and hover to pee. It aint easy, it aint pretty, it aint graceful, and it can get messy, but thats what they do, and what Id probably do to if in that situation. While were on the subject, do you know that some people wipe themselves behind standing up and some sitting down. The we…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 10:26 PM
1

Did you watch the video? The one by Syndey? Your question is answered there. And as the media stands, it is used as a braoder thing to shame men and the idea of masculinity. After this is done, we move on to the women are wonderful phenomenn to show how good being female is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CME-aeQXj9s&list=PLytTJqkSQqtpiuvMX5E2LY7jfjEzl2TmV&index=9 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhm_HZ9twMg&list=PLytTJqkSQqtpiuvMX5E2LY7jfjEzl2TmV&index=10 Also this may sound like a joke but it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 10:23 PM
13

This simple act described below, in a nutshell highlights the problem with all off feminism. Its echo chamber, its gynocentriscsm and its distortion of reality. ​ After an American school shooting, that rapidly turned took a feminist slant, Vox feminist, Sarah Kliff(@sarahkliff) rushed to produce feminist article, “Eight FACTS (lol) about violence against women everyone should know” ​ She say most women will experience physical abuse in their life time - 51.9 percent of women and cites a study. …
/r/MensRights22/04/20 09:30 PM
2

In practice, adopting a ‘gender lens’ typically means narrowing one’s focal point so that women’s interests (as construed by certain feminists) are the sole object of concern and women alone are worthy of compassion. The very type of ‘behavioural’ explanations for male mortality with respect to COVID-19 (eg. smoking rates) are totally discounted by social justice types when it comes to other issues where demographic disparities are evident (the ‘pay gap’; incarceration rates; etc). In the latter…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 07:10 PM
3

In UK, Shockingly ICU beds for Covid are being discriminated against by gender with women systematically (by design) and automatically preferred over men by giving them 1 point less on the acceptnace of a bed scale (get too many points, no ICU bed, you gonna die bro). How do people feel about this? I personally think these countries would lose their shit and go batshit crazy if women were automtically being discriminated life saving treatment: https://www.thesun.ie/news/5319621/coronavirus-in-ir…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 06:45 PM
22

The reason their logic makes no sense at all is simply because it is based on feminism, which is underpinned by the theory of patriacrhy which is as robust as modern flat earth theory In that officla femnisist statement, the amount of doublespeak and misinformation and hypscrisy is unebelievable. If feminism explicitly stated it was a movement for the interests of (certain) females. Thats fine, at least its honest and no issue with a movement lke that existing too. I have an issue with this obse…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 06:11 PM
1

A real exmaple of femisplaining - where feminist try to femsplain their views over men who are experts of their own bodies or of their lived experiences. FEminists in multiple countries are trying to ban peeing standing up and teaching this to young boys: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10555436/Im-taking-a-stand-against-peeing-sitting-down.html
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:05 PM
4

yes please do, feel free to edit the text and use as needed, it would be good if we could get this as an infogaphic, emphasising, how this is the formal position of multiple feminists organisations, not some fem on the corner of the internet
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:58 AM
2

Whao hold on, my issue is with feminists not women... the contribution women given to their kids is not crappy at all, for the vast majority whole it is amazing. Some women may do this crappy beahviour, as some men do this. Contrary to feminists narratives, it appears women are more likely to spread this toxicness to their kids, and abuse them and bully them, see link, however, lets not fall into the feminist hypocrisy here. As MRA we dont care if women do this more often, its not all women, not…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:00 AM
1

Mens rights and womens rights are the same and they can work together and the regularly try and help each other. Feminism is something different: It doesnt help when feminist are doing this either: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g5qxpl/feminists_fierce_opposition_to_making/
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:51 AM
2

Feminism is pro feminist, anti-man and anti any one who is non feminist. I cant even say its pro woman Its a cult and to them if you aint a feminist you the devil, and men are the privelaged ones out to get you
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:49 AM
3

MEN PEEING STANDING UP IS A SIGN OF THEIR SYSTEMATIC HATRED TOWARDS WOMEN. PEEING STANDING UP IS PATRIARCHY. WE MUST CONTROL MENS PEEE PEEEE. WE MUST.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:39 AM
2

Women contribute enormously to society and always have contrary to toxic feminist patriarchy theory (which is as robust as modern flat earth theory)... FEMINISTS are a toxic hypocritcal cult which only wants privelage and contributes only to itself.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:35 AM
2

same with JP, feel the same. What I really like about JP is why I checked him out. Normally a guy like that would never interest me. However he received soo much hate from feminists i thought i need to see is he really that bad.... DAMNNN blow away, this guy is anything but. I mainly care about his views on feminism. I love his views on free speech and anti identity politics, which has changed my mind a lot, as Im what youd classically see as someone who has identity features but now I am agains…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 10:30 AM
1

Its extrmely common for women to hover and semi stand up peeing. Ask 10 of your female friends. This is to avoid touching the seat. It is also extremely messy, hence womens toilets can be covered in piss Im not going to tell women how to piss or use their bodies.... women generally dont tell men, feminists however. LOL LOL LOL MY BODY MY RIGHTS... but GUYS DO THIS WITH YOUR PEE PEE a better example, of offical feminist stance: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g5qxpl/feminists_fierce_…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 10:24 AM
5

THANK YOU. Me too, thank you for the links. It would be awesome here if more people revised content, improved it, shared it, added more sources.... Feel free to take any thing I write and adapt it as needed.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:15 AM
3

I dont know much about her. After waking up and realising how toxic feminism is and how anti free speech it is (I genuine had no idea about how it used to block and censor before and crush non feminist dissent of even other feminists not towing the party line)... I am much more relaxed how I view people. Instead of considering everything I see how they are in a situation or issue. I dont need to agree with everything they say. I suppose as long as they dont have an overacrhing agenda. In this sh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 10:12 AM
3

Oh I get you. Yeah. I know this isnt what youre saying but since learning more about feminism and how anti free speech it is and the left increasingly, I have changed my opinion on people who are outspoken or controversial. Before I was like if they have a few negative views then I cant listen to them, so people like sydney and just anyone conservative I guess or on the right, I wouldnt listen too. Now Im of the opinion people are complex with multiple views and I can pick and choose. Now loads …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 04:31 AM
1

how come you dont like her? I think shes great. Good for learning issues, laws etc and karen straughn good for theory and concepts
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 04:25 AM
8

https://womenalliance.org/no-to-female-conscription
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:21 AM
4

anyone feel freeto take this, edit it, meme it whatever
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:20 AM
3

LMAO maybe tone doesnt come through in writing. Do you think Im worried, or offended or something? Its a joke. Obviously it isnt enforacable. I just thought it was a fantastic display of the fine work and hypocrisy of feminsts from all around the world. The article isnt extensive enough, this shit was being taught in german schools I call this term feminstplaining or femsplaing... feminist trying to tell qualified experts or men with lived experiencs what to do.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:17 AM
9

“The bias in favour of women “was totally unexpected,” said psychologist and co-author Wendy Williams of Cornell University. “We were shocked.” Research has consistently found that women are given jobs over equally qualified and even more qualified men, especially in STEM. At least one study was cut short because it was run by a feminist and the preliminary results showed a bias against men, not women. Although to her credit she did later own up to these findings in a Washington Post interview. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 04:15 AM
1

TOXIC FEMININTY - EXPLAINED HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwOne6dYZLg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyMcbLCDJy4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIHqMJdHyMA Evidence referenced in video 1: Studies about peer groups: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/... https://link.springer.com/article/10.... https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/a... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2... https://www.bbc.com/news/science-envi... Queen Bee Syndrome: https://steptohealth.com/queen-bee-sy... https://w…
/r/PussyPass22/04/20 03:27 AM
2

Thanks will do, and anyone feel free to make your own, copy, modify etc.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/20 03:15 AM
1

No. Society has long been gynocentric. Mens suffering is not treated seriously but women is. See this 2 minute video for a perfect example of a real world scenario of mens and womens suffering: https://youtu.be/u3PgH86OyEM This is why mens rights were never accounted for. The fact that men make up parliment etc is irrelvant as me are not specifically doing things for the benifits of the male gender. FGM is practicsed, propgated and preserved by women on women. Gender does not make a difference. …
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:19 AM
1

I used to think like you, until I actually learned what feminism was. And not it did not have a good origin. Womens rights had a good origin. Feminism had a deeply racist, classist, and Im not even going to say anti men because actually it is anti anyone who is not a feminist origin. mens rights is compareable to womens rights. It is aboslutely not comparable to feminism at all, and does not suffer from being underpinned by a central theory such as patriacrhy (which is as robust as modern flat e…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:45 PM
1

Just watch this: You will have every single question answered and will leave a more intelligent human. It is a q & a, and even feminists ask the question why cant I still be a feminist and like mens rights: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaO3THnOHhA this is 7 mins and is also excellent: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L254KuLx-4Y
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:33 PM
1

Yes gynocentrism and the gender empathy gap. One the one hand men dont give a shit about each other as a gender (men care about race before they care about gender) so men being majority in parliments etc makes no difference, being judges etc. So that completely shuts that feminist argument down. Just as it is women who practice and promote FGM on other women, same sex doesnt mean no bias. On the other hand, on top of men not giving a shit about each other as a gender (men care about race even be…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter