TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mhra1 Archive

View 21 posts and 169 comments by mhra1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
533

mhra1/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:08 AM
463

mhra1/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:32 AM
183

Discussionmhra1/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:18 AM
118

mhra1/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:00 PM
75

mhra1/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:09 AM
71

mhra1/r/MensRights23/12/13 07:03 PM
69

mhra1/r/MensRights12/12/13 03:26 PM
57

mhra1/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:38 PM
52

mhra1/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:04 PM
42

mhra1/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:35 PM
40

mhra1/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:57 PM
38

mhra1/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:55 AM
37

mhra1/r/MensRights25/09/13 09:18 PM
35

mhra1/r/MensRights16/09/13 05:08 PM
32

mhra1/r/MensRights06/09/13 08:01 AM
24

mhra1/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:55 AM
19

mhra1/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:30 PM
17

mhra1/r/MensRights07/04/13 10:46 PM
11

mhra1/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:51 PM
6

Generalmhra1/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:03 PM
6

mhra1/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The admin is completely, totally wrong. Or possibly lying. There is no doxxing on that site. In fact, there are strict policies there against that. This is a men's rights reddit? Wow.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:26 AM
1

We've never banned anyone for being too left or too right. We ban people for violations in our TOS, which I am guessing is precisely where you need to take your own advice about honesty, and reflect on who exactly is missing the point. You seem to be desperate to blame the ban on a prejudice against your beliefs. It simply never happened. I know this because I would never allow it to happen, nor would my moderators. It's your platform here. Rail all you want. Doesn't mean you have your head on s…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:25 AM
1

Paul here. And smiling. I feel your frustration. Fact is, I get just as many complaints from people on the right, which we often criticize for its traditional, chivalrous bent. I have been accused dozens of times of being a leftist and running a biased, leftist website. That is what happens when you actually are a men's rights website. The people that get pissed about our attacks on the left, are of course, generally speaking, on the left. And the same thing happens on the right. We get complain…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:07 PM
4

Not enough up votes in the world for this comment.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 09:12 PM
3

Not forcing them. Oh, that's rich. Universities were forced to erode due process for the accused by the Obama administration. That is how we got here, with a need to legally correct the problem. If you feel threatened by due process I am sure you will find happy residence in a country that has none. Try North Korea for starters.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 09:11 PM
12

This is most excellent. Best of luck to you in this effort.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 05:27 AM
7

I think the explanation for homophobia is gynocentrism. Male homosexuality takes them generally out of useful service to women.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 02:23 AM
0

You were done before you started. You just didn't know it.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 07:17 AM
2

Follow the Red Pill Movie Facebook page
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:09 PM
0

I can only repeat my question. What on earth makes you think I should feel compelled to explain anything to you?
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:51 PM
1

Yeah, that was the long form of the "put up or shut up" argument you made in your last comment. That is because there is nothing else worth saying to people like you. Show me you do more than run your mouth and I will be happy to sit down and have a long, explanatory discussion with you. As for now, I've much better people with which to have those discussions.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 06:08 AM
0

I know you won't like this, but I think that is also rooted in the fact that you don't understand any more about this movement than you do about me personally. The live I life, the people I love and who love me, the intent of my work don't make me anything like your narrow range of petty insults. I don't really blame you for feeling like you do. Life in the shadows only affords you a partial view, and I resolved a long time ago that caring about people like you was not in my interest, or in the …
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:33 AM
0

I am sure I wish more than you do that my work would be eclipsed by someone else. I've had more than my share of the limelight. Thing is, and I don't expect you to get this, I was preceded by a long line of people who practiced what you call a sense of civility. I bet you can't name most of them. There is a reason for that. This is not a battle of reason or rationality. It is not about facts or fairness. The Gay Rights movement started with Stonewall. The modern civil rights movement started wit…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 04:12 AM
0

How fascinating that you did not discover the "Cult of Victimhood" till after the editorial staff didn't make allowances for your prima donna expectations about the work you wanted published on AVFM. And that, folks, is the rest of the story.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 05:43 PM
2

Uh, maybe that is because Pizzey's (not Elam's) white ribbon does not collect any money. Just saying.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:48 PM
4

Nope. The use of red herring was perfectly appropriate in this case. Also, for the love of God, pay attention to the world around you. Look at the attacks on CAFE, Paul Nathanson, Janice Fiamengo, Warren Farrell and others. All fantastic people who stay within the strictest bounds of "appropriateness" and they still get attacked with the "ammunition" you are so terrified of. Social movements are not for weak people. Polite dialogue doesn't bring change. Read some history books. Pay attention to …
/r/MensRights11/06/16 12:47 AM
3

Sure, just remember it was Sinn Fein feminists who successfully protested MRAs being a part of International Men's Day in Dublin two years ago. That is what happens when you pussy down a movement.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 12:46 AM
1

Concise, precise and nice!
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:41 PM
1

Sure. It is an opinion. Everyone is welcome to one. Just the same, I will rely more heavily on the opinions of the people whose knowledge of the operation extends far past opinion.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 10:00 AM
4

Sorry, but you don’t have a clue what you are talking about. AVFM traffic is down because we have cut content by more than half. Content drives traffic, not quality. Check Buzzfeed and other similar super high profile sites and judge for yourself. We went from 4-6 minimum feature articles daily to 1-3 daily. And as expected, traffic dropped and will level where we are till we are complete with two major energy draining projects and return attention to high content production. One of those projec…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:33 AM
2

Have you ever considered approaching the sources for your questions? For instance, have you asked these questions of anyone from AVFM? Personally, I would be happy to answer any questions you have through PM, with permission for you to reprint. Paul Elam This, however, is not a men's rights forum, so I won't debate or defend myself or AVFM for the benefit of trolls.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 11:14 PM
2

Yes, Robert is way off base with this in my opinion. Finished product is all that matters, not what you are using. Indeed Jaye was using Canons with high end lenses. The production value is evident in the 8 minute extended trailer. If anything, this shows exactly what she is capable of with a low budget. 150k post production is chump change for a serious documentary. It is 17k alone just to get it submitted for Oscar consideration. Oh, and I really disagree with this: We already gave her what sh…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:10 PM
7

For those who think Cassie Jaye is grubbing for money, I hope she gets a million dollars. Three years of her life and talent invested in speaking fairly about the MHRM would seem to make it money worth giving and money earned.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:53 PM
1

Oh yes, put in my place by JTODD I was. LOL. Whatevs.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 04:59 PM
1

And yet... here you are defending yourself Not quite. Reddit is a cesspool of slacktivists who, rather than do anything, sit around here and wail about others who are actually working at this stuff. I could stop in here any day and "defend" myself but I am rarely here. This exchange is just one of my very sporatic moments of poking a stick at some turds. You will never be heard by anyone who cares or matters. Now, back to work for me!! :o)
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:06 PM
5

Nice conversation you are having with yourself, sonny. Have an even nicer life. :0)
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:52 AM
-1

Ok champ, why don't you publish the costs then openly? I run two LLCs with four senior execs. You think we make decisions like that because some self aggrandizing twit on reddit has a case of the red ass? I and AVFM owe you nothing.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:41 AM
2

How about some more honesty? When you say you "support the MRM" what you are saying is that you think a movement of some kind is a good idea. That's your support. Just what you think. Not what you do, which is zilch. That is precisely why I don't give a rats ass for men (assuming you are one) like you. You're a peanut gallery malcontent who does nothing. Worse than feminists by far. At least they have an ethos.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:39 AM
1

Oh I can stand it. I tend to mostly laugh at it. I especially laugh at people who "hope something else better comes along" but of course can't ante up to make that happen. Like it or not. AVFM is what you have in the pubic eye for the MHRM. Dissatisfied? Put up, or you know.....
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:34 AM
-1

I've been calling for this for a long time. AVFM is indefensible. ROTFLMAO, calling on who? Reddit commenters? You calling out to the great wide interwebs for someone to do something about AVFM? Maybe the Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus? Who the fuck do you imagine in that pointed little head of yours is listening when you are doing all this "calling out"? Have you even noticed that your calling out has resulted in jack shit? That is because no one who has the capabilty to do anything more than call …
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:28 AM
1

Is this it? Is this really your best shot? Your rebuttal is to pull imagined costs out of your ass and try to make a case on our expenses and revenue? Hint for you Einstein. It takes weeks, even months to make a credible budget for a conference and price tickets, etc. It involves a great deal of research. You need to do that so you don't come up with bullshit dream figures like you did here. Do you think that the caps lock on ONE OF MANY will give credence to your ignorant assertions about why w…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:14 AM
0

http://www.avoiceformen.com/allbulletins/update-on-attilagate/
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 06:14 PM
1

Fascinating perspective. We are on the last day of a membership drive for AVFM in which the number of new subscribers doubled my expectations. First, the ICMI 15 cancels due to low support and significant overpricing. ICMI 15 was cancelled and replaced with a retreat due to staff burnout. The tickets for the original event were ridiculously low compared to the cost of putting on the event. I did not expect you to know that since, you know, you really have no idea what you are talking about. Next…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:17 PM
1

Hey asshole. Show everyone how it is done. It is people like you who do exactly jack shit but moan and piss who slow this movement down, not people who try but run into problems. But please surprise. Maybe you and your do nothign weenie reddit buddies will take on the world and show us all what it is like to not just hope that one group does better than the other. Pfft. Wanker.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:35 AM
1

I have it on pretty good authority that the next video you see from Paul will be a detailed rebuttal to your comments here. :)
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:04 AM
1

Thought you said it was not about pissing off feminists?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:51 AM
1

You just made my day. No, my whole week. It really lifted my spirits to see a significant supporter who has obviously done his homework explain to people what AVFM does, and provide an idea of what it costs. I have very, very inside info on AVFM and I know you have nailed it woth a couple of minor exceptions. AVFM has four dedicated servers in three countries. You better believe that is freaking expensive. Also, tech director David King does in fact work completely without renumeration. That doe…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:22 AM
1

I think you are a pathetic, lying MGTOW+ with a rage boner for AVFM because Elam rejected your ideology and did so publicly. And we all know ideologues just can't stand dissent. Pfft. Done here.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:16 AM
3

Hookers and blow! Hookers and blow FTW!
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:12 AM
2

Maybe it gets confusing what the arguement is because you keep shifting the goal posts every time you run into a brick of logic. The answer to your OP is that AVFM exists as a business that is attempting to change the dialog about sexual politics. You can choose to donate or not, but no one there owes you access to finances. Don't like that? Yawn.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:11 AM
2

So now that you have been busted for your ignorance about the alexa rankings, you want to swtich subjects. Pfft. Obvious troll is obvious,.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:08 AM
3

And what have you personally allocated for men's rights causes?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:31 AM
2

Defeating your arguments in a rational matter is very, very simple. Getting you to think rationally is probably a different matter. Bottim line, AVFM is a privately owned business. Why should it matter to anyone there what business model you happen to think they ought to employ? The rational arguement here is that you might as well be posting here that you think Jezebel.com should be a 501(c)(3), and that they should open up their finances to scrutiny from every anonymous clone on the internet. …
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:26 AM
3

I am afraid you are mistaken. AVFM had a sudden dip in Alexa ranking sometime in late September. The dip coincided precisely with a change in algorythm employed by alexa. That change affected many sites in different ways, including a sudden drop many. It had nothing to do with a reduction in traffic at AVFM. Also, a higher ranking at Stormfront for US traffic means exactly what? Jezebel has a ranking that smokes most websites, and they are a bunch of idiot hacks over there. AVFM remains the most…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:17 AM
3

I just checked the alexa. It is the highest for AVFM I have ever seen.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:54 AM
1

I can, and I am thankful. It shows how far we have to go.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 07:06 PM
6

Is it about entitlement now? Warren Farrell has his own site. Should he not be interviewed on AVFM?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:24 AM
4

I have to wonder just how insecure the OP is here. AVFM has published stuff harshly critical of PUAs, including Roosh and others. Isn't it only fitting that some room be alotted for the man to speak his own peace? Are you threatened by that?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:53 AM
1

Good. Picketers attract news cameras.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:58 AM
0

I suppose that is true if what you are doing is sitting back waiting on the mainstream's version of things. Others see a lot more in the conferences than what CNN has to say.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:45 AM
2

Up voted for accuracy. Sage has accomplished a huge amount of progress in a very short period of time.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 04:22 AM
6

It's a gynocentrism problem.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:39 PM
2

Well, put, and we will be addressing the financial structure at the next management meeting. In the meantime, all donations coming through the white ribbon page are being set aside for expenses solely associated with that site.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:13 AM
2

All the information and scholarship available at whiteribbon.org IS gender neutral. In fact, its very mission is to bring gender neutrality to the IPV/DV discussion. I don't think it matters that WRC.org is owned by AVFM, as long as we maintain the integrity to treat WRC as a separate mission that has nothing to do with men's rights activism. All monies donated through WRC will go directly to that mission, not to AVFM operations.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:38 AM
2

Respectfully, I think the "gray" area is covered completely with the advisory above the donate button. There is no deception here at all. whiteribbon.org is owned and operated by AVFM.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:35 AM
3

We have EXCELLENT lawyers. We also have something else on our side. It is called THE LAW. Nothing illegal in what we are doing here.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:46 PM
-4

Being polite doesn't excuse asking something that is none of your fucking business to begin with.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:37 PM
-7

LOL! Are you trying to be a poetic therapist? If so you suck at both. Listen to you, seething on the surface In the fading quick, your rest, dormant A greasy potato on the floor of shame's kitchen Your sole legacy a gutter full of digital dirt A wish for relevance never to happen Adrift in a sea of failed ambitions Hacking away at anything that reminds you Of what you are not, and will never be.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:34 PM
-24

I am so wounded by your opinion of me. I can barely finish my coffee!
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:01 PM
-24

Good for you. I am sure it will make a big difference in your world.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:00 PM
-11

Bit of a temper there, eh? I like that in a keyboard warrior.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:59 PM
-5

This is not a community. It is a headline aggregate portal and does no activism. Oh, and when you spit. be sure to hit the shoes with it, just before you bend over and shine them
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:59 PM
-7

I am sure we will both survive the grief.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:57 PM
-9

http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/cmon-paul-what-do-you-do-with-the-money/
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:56 PM
-11

http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/cmon-paul-what-do-you-do-with-the-money/
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:56 PM
-15

I take it you have not been to many conferences if you think the tickets were pricey, http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/cmon-paul-what-do-you-do-with-the-money/
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:56 PM
-24

Done here, You lied about donating and buying a ticket. A proven liar whining about transparency is too far over the line for me. Have a nice life, asshole.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 11:48 AM
-32

Why should I? AVFM is my property. I own it completely.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 11:40 AM
-19

People have tried to demonize me since I started gathering an online audience. Before I even had a donation button. That is what people will do, especially ideological opponents. But you know who is not demonizing me? The great gathering of highly respected men and women, a senator, academicians, journalists, advocates, from every walk of like, men and women, gay and straight, black and white, across so many international lines, all united by a concern for men and boys - and for humanist justice…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:58 AM
-23

Then I will not donate. BINGO. Choice! Ain't it a grand thing? :)
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:50 AM
-28

I have attracted a wealth of donors. We are already planning the next conference. And just think, I get to do this without a bunch of feminist idiots picking over every dime I spend, writing pieces about it, trying to even further demonize what I do. My feet are both in good shape, but thank you for your concern.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:49 AM
-28

Absolutely correct. Many people give regular monthly donations to AVFM. Dozens of other contribute heavily at the AVFM fundraisers. The donations range from $1.00 to several thousand dollars. It appears that the donors feel like what they can actually see of AVFMs work is sufficient to cause them to keep donating, because they have been doing just that for years, and the numbers of them are steadily increasing. I have no need to make a public record of my finances because I have worked successfu…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:34 AM
-26

I asked for proof that they were a customer and believe they lied about it. Here is a quote for anyone who wants to put it across the internet. Start with David Futrelle's blog if you like. AVFM is owned and operated by me, Paul Elam. I take voluntary donations to the site and use it for the purposes I deem best for activism. I do not owe anyone a public accounting of my personal financial affairs, including how AVFM money is being held, or how it is safe from being "tampered with" whatever the …
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:26 AM
-48

Oh shock of shock, you are making public demands for "transparency" that has already been provided, claiming you are a paying customer, but feel no obligation to provide transparency of your own. The offer to speak with you privately as a customer was not to offer you information that was not already public, but to assist you further in understanding the information already provided. You are lying,
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:55 AM
-17

Let's get something clear. As was clearly stipulated in the fundraiser (which started while we were still intending to go forward at Doubletree) we said that the money would be used for security, legal fees and that any additional funds would be applied to next years fundraiser. AVFM has done exactly that. Also, please email your proof of ticket purchase to me personally (will provide you that in a PM), as well as your donation receipt. I will be happy to discuss this with you further, by phone …
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:39 AM
1

Way to go Canada!
/r/MensRights05/04/14 10:00 AM
2

Interesting. Occidental collects anonymous, unsubstantiated allegations, pledging to use them to harass students who have had nothing whatsoever proven against them, and you call this, not Occidental, bullshit. Riiiiight.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 05:52 AM
2

Here are the facts. Neither Hollander nor Groth ever wrote material exclusively for AVFM. Both agreed to republishing of a small number of works written for other venues. Also, SPLC never named AVFM or any men's rights website as part of a hate group. In fact, Arthur Goldwag of SPLC published that none of the sites in question were considered by SPLC as hate groups. That is correct, the only official word from SPLC on AVFM is that it is NOT considered a hate group. Goldwag also went further and …
/r/MensRights14/01/14 10:05 AM
2

It makes sense given that people like Michael Kimmel and other feminists have long used to the term "men's studies" Male studies sets them apart on sight.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 06:48 AM
2

I think you understand it perfectly.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 06:46 AM
1

They will be available online.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 06:45 AM
3

That I think is entirely up to the academicians doing it. If they want to produce scholarly research on human males, they will do it. Personally, I trust Dr. Groth will aim for precisely that. There is a danger, as always, that such studies could be corrupted with ideology. But to not try to counter corrupt academic feminism with actual scholarship on men out of fear would be a misstep, and a big one, IMO.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:24 PM
2

Course information is available in the OP and at NMS, linked in the OP.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:21 PM
3

Are you even capable of not lying? What gendered slurs? There is not a single gender based slur in the article. You are just making it up rather than face the fact that you accused him of woman bashing when he didn't do it. If you had an example of a gendered slur, you would have listed it. he would not take with a man, with many women. Laughable. You lack integrity. And I also now have to infer that you are just plain stupid. Elam has stridently, often viciously attacked many men. Have you seen…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:33 AM
1

All of that is irrelevant to the matter of your banning. You accused Elam of woman bashing, e.g. Your post here calling her a hypocrite, allying her with feminists she has long fought against, and demonizing her for a few sentences you disagree with is an excellent example of her point. Over the top, gratuitous, shooting your own foot, woman bashing. And this as a reaction to ONE WOMAN, who also accused him of woman bashing. So far, neither you nor Young has produced any evidence. What is worse …
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:26 AM
5

Ahh, I found the post, thanks to theskepticalidealist. You were indeed very misleading here. It is all still there on the site. You accused Elam of "woman bashing" which was precisely the objection to Young's accusations. And I happen to agree that it is not true. He gave you the opportunity to support that accusation with some sort of back up and you did not respond to him. So, what happened was exactly what I said it was in other cases. You made an ad hom attack, and failed when given the oppo…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 05:05 AM
6

Then I am calling bullshit. I have checked. You were not banned from AVFM for defending Cathy Young or for criticizing the criticism of her. You were banned because after warnings you continued to derail and make ad hom attacks when your POV was not accepted. That will get you banned from a lot of places. I think you are a liar. I have seen the same lies from a couple of other people. AVFM does ban people. I have never seen it happen "just because I disagreed," or "just because I criticized." I …
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:50 AM
1

Can you please post documentation of the NOW suits against men's shelters? Otherwise this post is bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 07:44 AM
7

There are true feminists working together for gender equality (both men and women) whether you want to believe it I hate to create an echo in this room, but please name them.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 08:44 AM
6

Men and women are working together for gender equality, but it is in the MHRM, not in feminism.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:45 AM
12

Feminists sure do have a funny way of showing it.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 03:41 AM
5

Click the link and you can get the details.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 11:37 PM
3

He is standing up to people right now that think due process is an optional part of the Constitution.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:02 PM
1

Yeah, I know what narcissism means. That is why I used the word. As to the rest, whatever.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:57 PM
6

I agree to an extent, but what was she supposed to do, treat the ice cream meme as though it were not fundamentally shallow to begin with? I don't think that the original ice cream meme is talking about just wealth. I think that it's attempting to describe the whole range of benefits and positive treatment one receives in society. Let us assume that this is true. In that case I think TB's response was even more on the mark. Simple fact, it was considered the wisdom of the age those who had to fi…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:34 PM
1

Guess what, dood. You could not be more wrong. People don't have to wait for your permission to identify political leanings and affiliations. If Marxists were limited only to those that have read Das Kapital, then there would be a much smaller group of morons spouting a completely debunked and useless political ideology. It almost makes me want to agree with you. Oh, and while we are at the inane, please be advised that Marxist is capitalized. So, just for the sake of having fun with your very o…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:34 PM
1

No, that is your narcissism talking. I care that AVFM makes an impact, not you.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:23 PM
1

Is there an actual point to any of what you are saying? There are lots of young Marxists who didn't read Das Kapital. And there are lots of feminists that didn't read Myth of Male Power, and lots of MRAs that did not read Feminine Mystique or a host of other ideological tomes. I do note, however, that Lucian Valsan knows about Marxism, and its real world manifestations quite well. I don't know what he has read, but I would feel foolish challenging his authenticity in talking about Marxism. It is…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 09:19 PM
1

Judging by their recently concluded fundraiser, it does not seem to have made an impact. And you are welcome.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 09:11 PM
1

I think the people that AVFM has attracted, which are already named in this thread, provide a perfect counter to any concerns about who is alienated. In fact, on AVFM pages I see nearly every living men's issue luminary of our times. I they they got the right people. And yes, I am very familiar with measuring web traffic. And you are right, there is a difference between visits and page views. I was responding to page views because that was in the post I was responding to. Perhaps that one slippe…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:15 PM
1

It is still subject to interpretation by the reader. Are you afraid to state your opinion?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:13 PM
1

Just curious. What do you think a better understanding of Marxism would be?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:18 PM
1

So in other words, you have no examples. Just what I already knew to be true. The article you tried to pawn off as throwing "fellow men who need help under the bus" had nothing to do with any man in particular, but was an article admonishing men to not wait till they were the ones in trouble before they expected the world to stop and for AVFM to fix their problems. AVFM helps men. Real men in trouble, and has since the beginning. Your implication that any man was thrown under the bus is nothing …
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:16 PM
2

What makes you think AVFM does not get millions? I can tell you they do. They are at tens of millions of page views now. Also, go to Alexa and compare the traffic of AVFM against Genderratic. Not even in the same universe. Nothing against Genderratic, it is a great site, but not even remotely close to AVFM in traffic. Plus, your logic is really, really flawed. Genderratic does offend people. TyphobBlue offends feminists nearly constantly. Anything that dissents from feminists dogma offends femin…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:07 PM
0

I didn't follow up because he erased my previous comment. Oh waa!! Complete, nonsensical bullshit spouted by a fucking child. Oh mommy, mommy, the bad man erased my comment so I could not dial a telephone! What does your previous comment, even if he really did erase it, have to do with the fact that his phone number and agreement to debate you were there in full view? And if you supposedly went in there and found your previous comment erased, then you had to see his response to your post. You ar…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:17 AM
5

Good points. AVFM's demographics are also young. A great deal of young people 18-24, while it also appeals to those 34-45, with a nearly even split in gender across the board (slightly favoring males). I find much of the critique here really laughable. While AVFM is certainly edgy, it has also enjoyed publishing the works of Miles Groth, Murray Straus, Warren Farrell, Neil Lyndon, Glen Poole and others, none of whom have serious enough issues with the website to refrain from presenting their wor…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:42 AM
1

yep. What he is really saying is that AVFM would not bend to HIS ideas, so that means they must be ideological and they must lack intellectual integrity.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:14 AM
3

You last exchange with him covered it http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/random-encounters-in-the-sea-of-pain/ Check the comments, dickhead. His phone number is in there to see, as is his acceptance of your debate demand, and his reminder that he has accepted your challenge repeatedly in the past. Perhaps you did not know about it because you don't bother to follow up your own trolling? You can now publicly retract your lie that it "never happened" because it is there for anyone to see, tim…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:30 AM
3

It is a screen name. But I understand. Thanks for letting me know.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:23 AM
13

What Elam argued, and quite effectively, is that with the current lack of due process for accused rapists, that guilt beyond a reasonable doubt was not attainable. Therefore, according to the rule of law, a juror knowing this must acquit. You seem to have left that little part out of your cherry picking. And Farrell's remarks on date rape, which you did not even have the integrity to qualify, in the piece you so ineptly tried to misrepresent, was addressing rape prevention, You just would not kn…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 10:10 PM
10

I wonder if they will try to sort out what took them to such a low as human beings. I suppose if they do they will also discover what drive them to such dishonesty, and the desire to intentionally take people out of context. Indeed, sad troll is sad. But personally, I find it encouraging. This is what feminists bring to the table. Lies, distortions and an utter lack of human dignity; finding any compassion for boys and men "awful." It is bringing them down more and more every day, and pushing de…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 09:57 PM
16

I wonder how it must feel to some people, the ones who wake up, who look back on their lives to a time when they looked at men talking about having compassion for themselves and each other as "awful"? I wonder if they will try to sort out what took them to such a low as human beings.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 09:16 PM
6

Statement from Paul Elam: Greetings r/mensrights. First, thanks to many of you for the support and some of the concerns about the upcoming interview with 20/20. To answer some of your questions, it was not possible for several reasons to secure my own recording of the interview. Nor am I inclined to do that with large media outlets as I have in the past with smaller ones. I want the invitations from the networks to continue and they are not likely to once it is established that I am going to tak…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:29 AM
1

Regardless of what scenario plays out, the wheels of the MHRM are in motion. Feminists have begun to rock back on their heels. And yeah, the only direction they can go in the future will necessitate the attempt to co-opt and take credit for furthering men's issues. That move will not go down without internal fracturing in mainstream feminism. There is just too much hate in the movement, too much animus against men, and too much money tied up in woman-centric industries. And do you think that the…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:20 AM
4

It seems to me the choices are limited. You can have a place like AVFM garner attention, and demonization, or you can settle for obscurity. Your choice is between bad breath and no breath. Choice sucks, for sure, but I will take the bad breath because no breath is certain death.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:02 AM
2

Gender differences in overall levels of relational aggression were not observed; You did a C and P of that. Did you read it? And the rest that followed does not demonstrate anything quantitatively or in terms of gender incidence. It is much the same for the Card paper. Nothing in any of this breaks down a direct analysis of gender incidence in relational aggression as described in the article by Davison. I am not being lazy. I am just reading what you are providing.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:00 PM
1

Just wanted you to make up your mind which position you were taking. Too much work to get there.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:47 PM
3

Agreed with blueoak on this. If you can't/won't fully disclose, it makes your representing the position of anyone else completely suspect. The data, which your partially quoted acquaintance claims is badly misrepresented, was sufficiently focused on female aggression that it only inspired further works that did the same. From Wiki: Mean Girls and books like Odd Girl Out by R. Simmons (2003) and Queen Bees and Wannabes by R. Wiseman (2003). Looks like a whole lotta bad misrepresentation going on.…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:18 PM
2

I don't find that calling all women cunts furthers the dialogue at all. First words you wrote.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:52 PM
1

Thinking that you own the arbitration on "elevating the debate" is for sure a part of the concern trolling. You don't. Read Jonathan Swift. Satire is not hiding behind hyperbole. It is an effective tool to raise issues and has been for a long, long time.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:31 PM
1

And the other option is, drum roll please, don't write that and no one talks about it, or the movement, at all. If you want to win an argument, you first have to have one engaged. The article is morally and intellectually defensible, even at its satirically most provocative. And I am completely happy to say this. Not all women, including the woman who wrote the article, are obnoxious cunts. That is a given for people that don't need remedial explanations of satire. Because if they do, especially…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:27 PM
1

And remember everyone, we should only speak of this in congenial tones at a reasonable volume, so as not to offend anyone or make them feel uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 03:15 AM
8

That is curious. I read insight in it. Perhaps not articulated in a way that will reach some people, but perhaps that was not the point of the rant. What I saw in the video was pretty consistent with the title. A woman, conducting herself like a bully and a sociopath falsely accuses a man in a crowd (who is doing nothing at all to her) of sexual assault (which could have gotten him beaten) and then pushes him over the edge of a drop off on to concrete. He is clearly injured. The crowd gives her …
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:57 AM
1

This is NOT Mary Kellett's jurisdiction. This case is from 2 counties away. The young prosecutor in this case, Jeff Baroody, actually did work for Bassano very briefly but left her office for unknown reasons during the Filler case. He is now an assistant district attorney in Rockland Maine, where he prosecuted this false rape case. I appreciate the intent of this post, but unwarranted praise of Kellett/Bassano are not helping efforts to take corrective action against them, which I have on good a…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:52 PM
1

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/to-the-nice-feminists/
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:22 PM
4

I am sure his grief will be uncontrollable.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:08 PM
1

In the OP
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:07 PM
2

Framing dissent as hate is a straw man.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:47 PM
1

I noticed an invitation to submit cited stats.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:45 PM
1

Or conversely, men have always been the ones socialized and forced to fight. Call that discrimination against women if you like but it strikes me as specious. My call is that the discrimination victim is probably the one not breathing.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:44 PM
2

AVFM is written mainly for MHRAs with a fairly sophisticated understanding of what is happening in the movement. It is more like a trade journal that assumes the readers fundamental understanding of a subject that might confuse some lay people. That approach seems to have enhanced AVFMs reach into the mainstream rather than diminish it. For instance, informed MHRAs won't need a primer on SAVE in Washington. They are a very well known advocacy group that has been pushing against the gender bias a…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 11:08 PM
3

You should keep up more with what is happening. There are news and media outlets, Including the National Post, giving increasingly favorable treatment to the MHRM because of AVFM's efforts.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 05:15 AM
1

Respectfully, this is laughable. No one else has ever been as successful at getting media attention, including positive media attention, on the MRM as AVFM. You may not like the way they do it, but they are getting it done. If you can't see that, then it is because you don't want to, not because it isn't there. Godwin's Law does not apply when you are dealing with people who actually act like Nazis.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 05:12 AM
0

Yeah, I am sure you are a real world shaker.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:09 AM
1

So in other words, none. Mind you, I am not knocking it, but considering the site runs 35-40 articles per week, almost all of which deal with current events and issues that directly affect men and boys, your point seems a little vapid.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:31 PM
1

98% or more of AVFM articles are not posted here, at least not by anyone at AVFM, and have not been for more than a year. Since you are not even aware of that I suppose the names of men like Vladek Filler and Gordon Smith I won't mention any of the others, either. Talk about talking a shitty game. You wrote four lines and fucked up on all of them.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:27 PM
3

Then I would also speculate that presenting yourself in public wanting to be ogled by those whom appeal to you is equally creepy. Honestly, I thought this post was hysterical. A great comedic break in my day.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:39 PM
3

And what issues have you "resolved" today? Just curious.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:37 PM
0

This coming from a person who makes a ton of accusations and then ducks out on supporting them with evidence? I think I will get my shame lessons elsewhere. Now, time to put you back on ignore.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:49 PM
0

She doesn't work out or not for me either way. I am still waiting for you to answer a simple question. Where is your proof she absconded with money? I take it you have long running mental health issues.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:31 PM
0

That's subjective, unless you are asserting that you make that choice for everyone?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 04:40 PM
1

It may well be a poor argument, but that isn't the issue at hand. The issue is the selective censorship by facebook. People have a right to poor arguments.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:33 PM
2

Honestly, it is pretty hard to take you seriously. You made a claim earlier that WBB had absconded with money. I asked for proof and you didn't respond, but here you are again. "Shitty" articles is pretty subjective, and if they are increasing web clicks from "loyal followers" it appears their subjective judgment is different than yours. At any rate, it seems foolish to fault a website for trying to increase traffic. You obviously have a bone to pick. Not exactly a shock on the internet. But unl…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:06 PM
1

OK, go take a look at it.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:19 PM
7

Did you see how they treated Warren Farrell when he came to give his bulletproof talk about the boy crisis? Tell you what. I have a connection. Let's see what happens.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:15 PM
4

I agree it does not disprove the 1 in 4, which pretty much disproves itself when you look at the research, methodology, etc. But the actual numbers are not bogus. I found the links and checked it out. Those are the actual number of reports from those schools, and even if you have an insane percentage of unreported rapes, the numbers can't approach anything like what I see touted by feminists all the time. When it comes to bogus info, this graphic has nothing on feminists.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:49 PM
3

There's no disputing taste, I suppose. I don't buy the one size fits all mentality though. I don't think it is worded perfectly either. But I am just one person. I watch their traffic though and they are getting slammed right now, and it appears to be sparking some reactions. In the MRM, I don't see it getting any better than that, yet. If someone stumbles on the real, world changing wording though, I hope they point it out. I would love to see it. :)
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:45 PM
3

That really depends on whose listening. I am not bothered in the least by words like truth and George Orwell. In fact, I am assuming that Orwell's legacy and the quote have survived in the cultural consciousness for a reason. I mean, I get what you are saying. Those things are not everyone's cup of tea, but, after all, what exactly would work for "everyone"? AVFM has a really impressive record of growth. Maybe not for you, but it certainly appears that a lot of people are taking them seriously o…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:39 PM
6

And it is just as unreliable.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:20 PM
4

It is honestly hard for me to understand that logic. With all respect, what is your priority? Men's advocacy, or your image in your social circle? As to this: BANNING THE TRUTH just screams lunacy, even if it happens to be an accurate description In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. ~ George Orwell The MHRM is a really brutal place to be. Even a hint of agreement with it in many social circles means being ostracized. My personal solution to that is to form a …
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:07 PM
10

http://communityvoices.post-gazette.com/opinion/the-radical-middle/27667--one-in-one-thousand-eight-hundred-seventy-seven
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:01 PM
1

This is interesting http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n1k0hWqURE
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:32 AM
2

I am a writer and I am interested in this as a story. Can you provide details?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:40 AM
3

BINGO. E is no libertarian. He is a traditionalist.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:30 AM
5

Perhaps her departure IS a course correction.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:24 AM
6

Outstanding article. Robyn is to be commended.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 01:09 AM
0

Looks like you have a good case of redass about AVFM there. LOL Some of your criticism is valid. Some of it is pure left field. AVFM not only makes lots of converts, many of them end up writing for the site and assisting with activism. They have grown exponentially by attracting new MHRAs to the site. They are the first men's rights website ever to attract a large contingent of women, including people like Erin Pizzey. You may be right about MLK, but then again, this is not the same battle the M…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:32 PM
2

I know you asked someone else, but I have several favorites. Getting Gordon Smith exonerated and his wife charged for false accusations is a good one. Playing a huge role in Mary Kellett being the first prosecutor ever in the state of Maine to be referred for suspension is another good one. I also enjoyed the way they worked the media in Toronto, playing it so well that they even had a female mainstream newscaster calling the feminist protesters "shameful" They are also right now working togethe…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:22 PM
1

What is the pay off for a bait and switch article for those who are already familiar with the movement vs. the amount of people that would have half read the article and left in disgust? Aye, there's the question. For me the answer is pretty obvious. The MHRM has been stagnant for decades, for as long as it has existed actually. It is not because there has not been good literature. Going back to E. Bellfort Bax in 1913, all the way through Warren Farrell and in between there has been a very sign…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:09 AM
5

I'd say it is a little more complicated than can be reduced to a "dick move." I am pretty sure it was not done for a "laugh" http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/study-91-of-mothers-abuse-children-fathers-7/
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:16 AM
2

I understand how you feel, but the fact is that according to those who knew Earl best, part of the reason he killed himself was that he hoped it would motivate people, MRAs specifically, to do more than talk. None, or very few of us, including those here, are exempt from that criticism. All the down votes in the world won't change that.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 03:55 AM
-17

Because one dead activist, even in this place, is of little interest to most people.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:03 AM
3

I have read many arguments against RHC. This is one of the least compelling. The "We are the World" tone of this call for an olive branch to be extended to hate mongers is just under whelming. There may be good reasons to take the site down, rename it or otherwise. If not now, then in the future. But you have not succeeded in naming any of them here.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:26 PM
1

Every ounce of my being, from my mind to my heart, soul and instinct is screaming that we are in the reconstruction phase now. I just find it odd, that over at a "Voice" for Men, they had the Agent Orange files for a long time now. How have they used it? To expose feminism or individual male hating bigots? Not really. They used the data, and the drama after the data was made public in the MRM, to try to enhance and expand upon their overall position in the MRM so as to further influence the MRM.…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:52 PM
1

Tell you what. When feminists stop shaming male sexuality; when they abandon sexist, shaming bullshit like "men can stop rape," when they quit using "cisgendered" and "heteronormative" as an insult, then we can talk about how to address a woman who chooses excess in her sexual life. Feminists, of all people on the planet, should never, ever complain about any kind of shaming. They could show a thing or two to Catholic Church on that subject.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:11 PM
1

Ah, sorry.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 03:20 AM
1

Just a FYI, that is Free Domain Radio, not TGMP.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:56 AM
2

I'd like to know what feminists out their extremists. I watched the whole radfem hub thing go viral with scarcely a word from feminists, except complaints that they were doxxed. I still see a lot of hateful ideologues embraced by mainstream feminism. Sorry, I don't think you see this clearly at all.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:36 AM
16

I don't think you have lurked long enough. The MHRM throws crazies under the bus all the time. Feminists either embrace their crazies or pretend they don't exist. No mirroring on that level at all.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter