TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

middproxxy Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by middproxxy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Flip it upside down and suddendly she's out of your league... from below.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/07/21 02:36 AM
3

You're a cart puller because most types of fun/enjoyment for oneself seldom comes cheap. Even after all other human beings have left your space, your gear will always remain with you and will never betray you in reciprocity to proper care (unlike women). You're a cart puller because, as an individual, deep down a part of you sees and knows that you yourself are sometimes sitting upon the very cart you pull.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre28/07/21 07:02 AM
2

Was it fds?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/21 07:49 AM
1

Wait. Is a gay guy? Looks like he ain't getting testosterone-soaked monster cocks either.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/21 05:05 AM
2

Dibs on the maracas!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/21 04:54 AM
1

I'm a confident woman, I'm an opinionated and nasty woman, and I feel myself hardcore. I think I'm sexy, I think I'm smart, and I'm proud to have a badass job that I love and a circle of badass women to call my friends. I'm also a busy woman: I play guitar, I volunteer in my community, AND I work my ass off, so I don't have a ton of time to waste. Welcome to hell with someone that will call you worthless no matter what you do. not even sure I believe in marriage or even traditional, monogamous r…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/21 04:52 AM
1

I thought she was 50ish .____.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/21 04:38 AM
2

one must consider the source. On point.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/21 04:20 AM
1

Kudos to you :). "Today me" wouldn't be able to do it :'). Too frightened of getting a false accusation or worse.
/r/seduction28/05/21 10:44 PM
1

Reads like a taker.. Take'er to the dumpster fellas.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/21 08:11 AM
1

The core problem is in identifying the ones that may somehow take it well, from the ones that will not ever.
/r/seduction29/01/21 03:05 AM
1

Meta-chasing around xD.
/r/seduction29/01/21 03:04 AM
0

I apologize for giving the 70th updoot.
/r/seduction12/01/21 02:15 AM
2

Oneitis?
/r/seduction09/01/21 09:33 PM
1

Watch out for Halo effect, the capacity in a woman to pull it off usually comes paired with some degree of NPD.
/r/seduction04/01/21 08:24 AM
1

That, but politically. Like they can't wait to pack you a nice lunch when you say "Awright, Imma go now".
/r/seduction26/11/20 11:56 PM
56

Even worse: it's a clueless, fruitless, manipulative investment.
/r/seduction26/11/20 11:55 PM
3

This is what is slowly killing the dating drive for men. Rejection is one thing, false rape police and social accusations are a huge risk, especially the social one. Day-to-day Latam is already experiencing backlash and this is a big consecuence.
/r/seduction23/11/20 01:18 AM
1

Not to mention too many scammers and subsequent returns make previously good products go bad...
/r/seduction22/11/20 07:45 AM
2

So it's a "win and get the chance to win more"?
/r/seduction22/11/20 07:43 AM
2

And that's something we should always note at the start.
/r/seduction22/11/20 06:35 AM
2

Is itpossible to learn this power?
/r/seduction22/11/20 06:34 AM
5

Women don't get their ducks in line from man to man, and excel at disarraying a man's lined-up ducks. If you can get her, be safe knowing she won't care enough beyond what you pose.
/r/seduction22/11/20 06:33 AM
11

The same goes for women. I now know I was following the wrong rules, but hell how did I manage to attract only duplicitous ass scammers only?
/r/seduction22/11/20 06:30 AM
1

That's the thing bro. I tried living as if the universe and life had order or point, but it only did me wrong. So after a long time living in a (factually for me at least) losing dogma, a change of paradigm towards seeing life and the universe as chaotic and pointless, so far has yielded better results. The way I see it there is no road ahead, only behind and right under our feet that make it so. There is no predetermined destination, only where our feet take us and what we do at every step. One…
/r/seduction20/11/20 04:04 AM
2

Yeah, I kind of reductio ad absurdum'ed it a bit. Sorry about that.
/r/seduction20/11/20 03:48 AM
1

Oh I had very personal spiritual wanderlust-ing in the past. I still do, the one difference being it became less and less esoteric and certainly less open as every demonstration of that attitude being an exploitable vulnerability became painfully real. My spiritual realm knows well enough to lock the door on the way to the physical realm, it has learned the rules aren't the same the hard way.
/r/seduction20/11/20 03:46 AM
1

What you don't seem to understand is that your experience is not representative. There are simply not enough compatible enough people close enough for your experience to be the default. We all want that for everyone else. But for a moment stop and think that people are different. Take for instance people that entirely reject spirituality. Would you force it down their throats just so your experience would work for them as well, or do you have an alternative way of making it work just as good as …
/r/seduction17/11/20 12:02 AM
1

But we only discovered them. They existed independently of us. And we discovered them because we could prove their existence beyond doubt, even if they are of no use to us. Many things strictly untangible are perfectly verifiable, in this specific case, behaviours. There is more verifiable evidence pointing towards the indifferent essence of the universe. Things are not random, in our accessible scale of the universe, everything has cause and effect, but believing that deterministic nature. What…
/r/seduction16/11/20 11:50 PM
1

That's the thing. Reliance on spirituality is inversely proportional to the objectiveness of the search
/r/seduction16/11/20 11:31 PM
1

In fact what you propose in your post, sounds a great lot like the statistically proven technique of "increased attempts increase the probable number of positive impacts". But your proposal sentimentally deviates to the goal of one single perfect shot that would be attainable within an undetermined number of attempts, then place a trait of ultimate perfection to that one single success among successes. Ascribing that kind of perfection upon a human being is denying its human nature. For most un-…
/r/seduction16/11/20 04:25 AM
1

Everything that exists is provable by definition. However, anything that would be to stand the test of applicability and "functional entity", should be backed by strong enough empirical evidence and scientifically provable data as to overcome contrasting theories. In essence, everything can be constrained by operating rules, and whatever cannot, must be discarded to the bin of unusability, on the basis of impracticality. Even magic is only purposeful if it can be bound to deterministic rules. Wh…
/r/seduction16/11/20 04:14 AM
1

There would be statistical evidence of it. Large populational analysis. Quantum mechanics are at the core edge of our perception of chaos, and those are measured by statistic analysis. Ideas and thoughts housed in a physical brain, biased by psychologically and chemically mappeable biological, behavioral imperatives are surely definable in statistical studies. There are two sides to the story indeed, but punch and crunch the numbers fed by both sides in an unbiased manner, and you'll get the way…
/r/seduction16/11/20 04:05 AM
1

Then if it pleases you so, do not ask of people to heed your advice. Write it out, go small on the motivations but big on the explanations. Not everyone can accomodate every single point of any given ideology, but some might be able to adapt some of it if it would suit them. Don't push knowledge or ask for acceptance. Simply lay it out and, if you did pose something that triggers inquisitorial questioning on someone, that someone will react by asking. Post a happy testimonial that goes contrary …
/r/seduction16/11/20 03:51 AM
1

If you can passively convey a plausible point without relying on "a higher order of things" or "predestination" or anything that can't be backed up by scientifically provable or safely conjecturable evidence, then believe me, the point will convey itself. You are welcome to try.
/r/seduction16/11/20 01:08 AM
1

Lessee... let's assume there are about 50 people at any given time that could be considered your soulmate. Among 7.8 thousand million people, but lets cut it in half and half again for all the ones whose sexual preference doesn't align with you. That would leave it at 1 950 000 000 people, now divide by 50 to get the one-in. That leaves us with one in 39 000 000 people. That's about the 37th place in the list of populations per country. On the lowest extreme, that would mean meeting everyone in …
/r/seduction15/11/20 05:50 AM
6

Stonks
/r/MGTOW25/10/20 07:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter