midnight2196 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuity It has to do with condemning folks for lacking ethical standards that you do not have. You still aren't grasping what hypocrisy is. You must be joking mate. You either are obtuse on purpose or you just can't read. You seemingly take unimportant pieces of what I wrote and act like that was all I fucking said. My while fucking point is there is no damn condemning of anything. Unless you somehow mean anything short of having sex with them is condemning,because in that case you have issues. So let m…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/09/20 11:23 PM
1	It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuity If you have a high n count and will reject a woman, out of hand, for having a high n count, you are a hypocrite. Being hypocritical isn't about who you like, it's about who you reject and why. I'll make it simple for you. Good and bad,same action. The hypocrite will consider this particular action taken by other people bad,while the very same action taken by him to be good. In our case,there is no good. Both the guy and the woman he rejected,they are bad. Specifically because he know he is bad,h…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/09/20 09:11 PM
1	It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuity Rejecting a person, out of hand, for doing things or being things YOU ARE. Is hypocritical. Why is this so hard to understand? Because when it comes to your romantic partner,you can want someone with better qualities than you. That is not hypocritical. What is so hard for you to understand? There is no room for your stupid equality here. As I've said before,you can acknowledge you HAVE a bad quality and therefore not want it in a future partner.It's as logical as it can get. It's up to the futur…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/09/20 08:01 PM
1	It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuity Holding others to standards you do not meet is hypocritical. That is a rule in general,for your friends,for society,not for your romantic life. You can have whatever preferences or arbitrary standards you want for a partner. You can have what you consider negative qualities(sleeping around,being fat) and still have the preference for positive ones(ltr oriented,fit) etc. The only thing that matters at all is how you respond to the rejection of the person in question. You are being a hypocrite onl…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/09/20 06:12 PM
1	It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuity Which would mean if he himself has a high n count and rejects women out of hand for having an high n count, he is a hypocrite. He can reject any person for whatever criteria he wants,even if he himself has done it.That still does not make him a hypocrite. How hard it's for you to understand? It is not the action that is important in being a hypocrite,it's the thought behind it. Me thinking I'm virtuous for sleeping around while others are all degenerates would make me a hypocrite. If the person …	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/09/20 04:30 PM
1	It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuity Rejecting high n count women out of hand when you, yourself have a high n count, is hypocritical. That is not what being a hypocrite is. He is not obligated to like the same things he himself does.That's ludicrous. Him rejecting high n count women,or him pursuing a low count woman has nothing to do with hypocrisy. He can make that choice all he wants. Hypocrite would mean him judging and condemning every other promiscuous males harshly while he himself is promiscuous. Or him condemning the low c…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/09/20 11:24 AM
2	Dating in a politically polarized world He did not. I mean,really,I see you people here actively hating on this Trump,yet you always bring up the same lies again and again. It has already been stated and provided a video dozens of times where the claim that he calls the terrorists good people is totally idiotic. Like really,if the guy is so deplorable,can't you find some damn legitimate points to bring?	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/02/20 10:57 PM
4	What do you think of men who justify violence against women by calling it self defense? For fucks sake,you do not even need any big strength,one damn pencil and you can blind someone's eye. There are an infinite number of things around us that even a child can use to hurt people.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/01/20 06:44 PM
13	What do you think of men who justify violence against women by calling it self defense? So besides your obvious misandry,I see that you also place the fault on the victim right? "you instigate them" the shit you on? Also you do not have any idea how easily someone can inflict harm.' "She cannot inflict the harm" Hm,so you also infantilize women? Misandry and sexism all in one pack.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/01/20 03:01 PM
2	Slut-shaming is not only factually correct, because overwhelming evidences shows a woman's N count is inversely correlated to her future marriage stability and happiness, but it is also healthy. You lost the battle when you tried to weasel in the "Women can’t enjoy sex at all".	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/11/19 04:18 PM
1	CMV: Men can be neutral about high N women but it is rarely a postive Sex with multiple people allows you to properly explore a variety of styles, grow adept at reading body language and reactions, practice different techniques because people like and respond to different things. Maybe multiple partners as in multiple relationships. I hardly doubt casual sex or ONS has any relationship with what you said. Having sex with strangers is like the worst possible ever time and place to explore,grow adept or practice different techniques.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/09/19 09:32 AM
1	Leftists and the male sex. skin tone is very light. The lighter skin tone,most of the time,I find it absolutely gorgeous.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/19 08:49 PM
1	Leftists and the male sex. Oh, no. Not at all. I might ask why. For me,I am not very attracted to the darker tone skin. And from what I know most of the black people have that darker tone skin. But of course when I say black people I mean in general,not every damn individual. It does not mean there are still not a lot of beautiful women with darker stone skin.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/19 05:52 PM
1	Leftists and the male sex. My actual point was that in a lot of cases, if you have misguided preconceptions about a group of people and that you are basing something like your preferences on, I would argue that preferences are based on ignorance. Stereotypes,ignorance,prejudice. Preferences based on this are indeed stupid. But then you have to think what are really the true misguided preconceptions and what is the nonsense brought by disgruntled people. An example would be users screaming "insecure" towards people with go…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/19 03:42 PM
2	Leftists and the male sex. The only problem with the first two is the need for this "i'm not racist" like they are afraid someone will jump and call them that. In fact,given how frequent the usage or racism/racist has become,how asinine it is used and the amount of times that usage is only for the shutting of an argument,sooner or later people will call you crazy,ignore you and take it as a compliment than anything else. As for the third,it's very much true unless used as an excuse. And now that I've entertained you on th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/19 12:50 PM
1	Leftists and the male sex. Kinda that's the problem,most of the are not based on ignorant statements(beside the biology thing).	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/19 06:52 AM
3	Leftists and the male sex. It really does interest me when some people state their preference and then go on to state that they have this preference because X is A, B and C and makes me wonder if their "preference" is actually a preference. If they said "This is my preference" and nothing else,the very next post would be a question from someone asking "why" and just waiting for those specific buzzwords to start with his "You are an asshole etc" argument.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/07/19 08:46 PM
8	Being a slut is advantageous to women in 2019 What's next on the list? Being promiscuous prevents cancer?	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/02/19 10:49 AM
2	No strings attached: the nature of casual sex in college students. I have no time for uptight sexually repressed women. Okay.So there two spectrums now:the uptight sexually repressed women and the over the top promiscuous women.The in between must be some accidents of nature. Pretty much that's why many people take such statements as a joke.They are so exaggerated that they have no tie to reality any more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/02/19 08:51 AM
1	Q4Women - What is your stance on high n-count men? Nah. Puritanical and traditionalist are just fine. Way better than this joke called "being progressive".	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/12/18 07:34 AM
1	Q4Women - What is your stance on high n-count men? Such a powerful statement.Was the child in you speaking?	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/12/18 07:24 AM
1	The guys that "sluts" want to marry are totally ok marrying a "slut" Oh,the old "either religious virgin or very promiscuous girl". Kinda hard to be convincing when using such logic.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/12/18 09:55 PM
2	OP in /r/relationships thinks that his fiancee's sexual history of having orgies and sex in club toilets is shocking and can't imagine raising kids with her. Comments all shame him for these views Eh,have a nice time living in that fantasy of yours.There's hardly any point in trying to argue with someone who's petty mind has already thought of the answer even before the question. I can say the same way,that every promiscuous person out there is insecure as fuck.There's no reason to it,no logic,but since I'm someone who is all knowing about women even though I am not one,my answer becomes universal. In fact,you know what,I am insecure.Let's settle on that.I don't really see the big fuss wi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/12/18 10:11 PM
1	OP in /r/relationships thinks that his fiancee's sexual history of having orgies and sex in club toilets is shocking and can't imagine raising kids with her. Comments all shame him for these views A dude can have a 5some with four chicks and he'll get high fives. You watch too much movies. And to compare anal sex done in a relationship with orgies with randoms in club toilets,fuck my life. The reason he posts about it is because people has been brainwashed to think they need some sort of agreement from society for personal decisions.Too bad /relationships does not reflect society at all.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/12/18 09:26 AM
7	OP in /r/relationships thinks that his fiancee's sexual history of having orgies and sex in club toilets is shocking and can't imagine raising kids with her. Comments all shame him for these views Having orgies and sex in club toilets is disgusting no matter how you spin it. And 20 partners at 23 is still damn lot.I don't care how you break it to try and make the number less significant.Not to mention she could not have had 3 partners per year since OP mentions orgies. She had orgies and fucked randoms in club toilets.Yes,I expect the majority are not willing to do this. "Of course not, because her having more sex than him implies she had a life before she met this guy. It implies he's no…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/12/18 09:19 AM
3	What are your thoughts on slut shaming? Then you must be an idiot if you think that way. But I understand. You can only hope to play the religious argument.The famous "antiquated,puritanical" views. And why are you so obsessed with finding out what's my N-count? If it's low,will you call me a virgin,inexperienced,religious,boring etc? And if it's high,will you scream "hypocrite"? Actually,it's quite sad you consider a promiscuous person to be tainted. That's such a stupid and crass word to use. Can I take it your purpose in using that…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/18 08:40 PM
1	What are your thoughts on slut shaming? You have a very black and white view so to speak. If it hurts someone,it is wrong,it if does not,it is right. That is what your whole perspective amounts to.Even children have more complex views that that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/18 10:34 AM
2	What are your thoughts on slut shaming? The 50+ one?I doubt it. There is no proof or even any logic,reason to that statement. The only thing she experienced is variety.Not variety in regards to sex,variety in regards to people. This whole myth and fantasy high count people perpetuate,that somehow all that casual sex with strangers is the kinkiest or most fun or pleasure inducing,reminds me of those fairy tales where parents tell their children to not stay at night cause monsters come for them. As in you must be an idiot to actually be…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/18 10:21 AM
3	What are your thoughts on slut shaming? Now,why use the word "tainted"?Where does neon specifically say that a woman is tainted?Why bring religious bullshit here? Call her "unfit".Not for the whole population,for him only. For him,that high n count is unfit for a relationship. And if you wish for an answer about men,you will ask a woman. I literally do no care what the random man does the same way I don't care what the woman does.I start caring only when it concerns dating.But as I do not date men...you get the gist of it. I do not un…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/18 09:58 AM
6	What are people's thoughts on this Reddit post? Keyboard warriors. Their fingers smash the key with such charm and power that all the women become wet at the sound of it and their moans echo throughout the galaxies.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/11/18 07:25 PM
6	Video games are creating an entire generation of incels. Bro,he does not want people to actually socialize.He just mentioned clubs or pubs.His idea of socializing is probably partying,getting drunk af and random sex with strangers.So yea,his pathetic version of socializing is probably 99% getting out and flirting with women. This is what that "twice as well" refers to. People like him,their goal in life is just that:picking up or fucking as many women as possible.I can't fathom why otherwise he would come here and post such stupid nonsense shit.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/09/18 05:20 PM
1	What do you personally consider to be "a lot" in terms of N-count, and why? The only difference you propose here is that the amount of people results in more or less opportunities. In your book basically everyone would have 100+ given the chance to be in a metropolitan city. I really don't see the connection here.Someone who does not want to have sex with strangers is not gonna change that behavior because suddenly he/she is in a city with more people.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/09/18 07:18 PM
3	What do you personally consider to be "a lot" in terms of N-count, and why? His "risk averse personalities" was short saying they are a bunch of boring nerds. People should really remember that outside their specific social circles,promiscuous people are a minority and not everyone is shit and giggles about sleeping with strangers.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/09/18 10:41 AM
2	What do you personally consider to be "a lot" in terms of N-count, and why? Good jokes. Especially that one with the bachelor part. And triple digits too.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/09/18 09:23 PM
4	What do you personally consider to be "a lot" in terms of N-count, and why? Not like you can't find guys with numbers similar to you so it's fine.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/09/18 01:12 PM
30	What do you personally consider to be "a lot" in terms of N-count, and why? I mean,the girl has a number higher than her own god damn age. I think of that as "a lot".	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/09/18 12:03 PM
10	Reality of N count; Most women lie. Men don't ask, boys do. You are an outlier,a big case.For real,the fact that your "high N frat boyfriend" would consider a low count woman as a boring conservative nerd is as lame and childish as it can get so I don't know what you are trying to say here. In the first place,those virgins or low N girls do not even come close to the typical social circle of a frat boy.Their definition of fun does not equal to sex,drugs and booze so if I am to say something,is it YOU who do not know too many virgin or low N girls.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/09/18 05:13 PM
6	Reality of N count; Most women lie. Men don't ask, boys do. For god sake,you don't understand it because there is none.There is no competition,there is nothing. There are two lanes here:the one who likes it and the the one who does not.It's simple.If I do not like it,I want a partner who feels the same.There is nothing to like in having sex with literally strangers,which is what 99,9% of ONS are. I feel like the only way for people like you to understand that very simple idea would be to hammer it directly in your brain.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/09/18 03:46 PM
7	Reality of N count; Most women lie. Men don't ask, boys do. For real.It would actually make sense to be insecure about a LTR of a couple years.Since it would be pretty challenging to surpass the connection and passion in that relationship.It would actually make sense for you to have worries. But OP expects us to be insecure about someone having sex with strangers.Which is ludicrous. The inexperience thing?Even more ludicrous.Because I am pretty sure those ONS are not some wild sex,new poses and all the kinky shit.In fact,I would bet they are more boring …	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/09/18 03:26 PM
3	Reality of N count; Most women lie. Men don't ask, boys do. I really don't know what you define insecure and inexperienced.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/09/18 03:11 PM
16	Reality of N count; Most women lie. Men don't ask, boys do. A subtle way to encourage this bullshit?Nice try. Because I've never even heard a girl shy away because she had too low of a count or because the guy would want a more experienced girl lol. If anything,I would expect her to be bothered by this question because she may think the guy considers her a promiscuous person or a slut or some other nasty words.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/09/18 02:36 PM
1	Do you believe in the saying "The past is the past" when it comes to partner count? Don't see why someone would choose any of the two.And it's kinda of silly to give such example since a cheating partner like that would not even get a second look.Kinda like someone with numbers in the hundreds.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/18 07:58 PM
1	Is there a number of sexual partners that would turn you off from a partner? Those are normal numbers.But they represent LTRs,only LTRs. That sexual compatibility,unless poles apart,can easily be worked as long as both the partners wish for it. I can hardly abstain from laughing if someone comes here to tell me that all those ONS,flings or whatever were to find the most sexually compatible person.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/07/18 02:40 PM
4	Reagarding a women's sexual past and why men place a high value on it. Or they follow "don't ask questions you don't want an answer to". I mean,that's the usual answer from users here on reddit whenever this issue comes up. So it's not that it is not important,more likely that they wish to live in ignorance since an accurate answer may change their perception of their SO.They are afraid basically.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/07/18 05:57 AM
2	high libido / non-monogamous males are hypocritical AND irrational to demonize female "sluts" What is there to respect and empathize with the slut mindset?	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/06/18 02:25 PM
1	I think that modern feminist views about sexual past crumble as soon as your own brother is at a disadvantage "the virgin super-model millionaires won't date you." What is this?You use the same stupid retort people use here. Look,the spectrum between a virgin and a promiscuous woman is a humongous.And most people want the between,never the extremes.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/18 06:07 AM
1	I think that modern feminist views about sexual past crumble as soon as your own brother is at a disadvantage "If a woman has been sleeping around,chances are she is comfortable with her choice and she shouldn't be dating men who don't agree with her choices." Oh,my,you pure soul,you have not been on /relationships did you not? I mean,this whole shit hole is solely because some women who are promiscuous do date men who don't agree with their choices.They basically know that the respective men would not agree with her choice,so she lies about it.Then we have months later him finding out and then the dram…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/18 05:57 PM
2	I think that modern feminist views about sexual past crumble as soon as your own brother is at a disadvantage "I have actually been made fun of for not being promiscuous enough." Can't even fathom the stupidity of this. "At the end of the day, I don't need an opinion from random people on my personal choices that don't affect them." Of what do you speak of? "I have told my boyfriend about all men I slept with, just like he told me about all the women he slept with, but if someone I barely know asks me, I'll tell them to go make love to themselves." No ones ask people to tell strangers about their histor…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/18 03:37 PM
5	I think that modern feminist views about sexual past crumble as soon as your own brother is at a disadvantage Rather they are offended to be seen as a promiscuous woman.Not because it's personal. And enough of this "none of your business".The partner gets to decides his own criteria by which he chooses a partner. The woman only decides if to reveal it or not.Nothing more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/18 07:31 AM
1	On high n-count women Ohh,this is often the excuse people here seem to give out to anyone who has doubts about gf's past or anything. Something like "She's with you now.Etc etc." But then again,if the former bf would've came to reddit,they would've have said the same thing.And to the one before,the same thing too. So you're not really as special as they want to make you believe. But...but she saw those before him in a favorable light too lol .Otherwise she would not have been with them. " if a woman is choosing to be…	/r/ExRedPill	26/01/18 10:40 PM
2	Should I Consider This A Red Flag? What is with some of you people and this insecurity nonsense you toss here and there. He wants to talk about sexual history.Good.She's not honest.Good again,he leaves her and done with it.If she's not honest and lies,there is his ticket out of the relationship. She's not some reincarnated Goddess that is so wonderful you'd rather not find out truth you deem important.	/r/askTRP	17/01/18 09:17 PM
2	Discussion: N-count. Yes and I was not referring to you who clearly stated that desires no relationship,I was referring to all the others who clearly stated that they desire one.And by your words,it is indeed degrading to settle. Look,we who look exclusively for LTR and you who look exclusively for casual live in two different bubbles.Everything is all right when we don't interact.The problem begins when some woman from your bubble tries to enter ours.Now the problem is not that they try to enter,we can too enter yo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/11/17 04:36 PM
2	Electra explains Hypergamy Nothing of this makes sense mate. Frame,game,smv all this bullshits words.Suddenly the relationship is no longer a relationship,we have transactions,deals,territory zones,invisible contracts and all other shit. "Gotta keep her in your frame" What the hell does this even mean?It seems like every problem in a relationship now has some sort of word to define it now.No more working on fixing the relationship,nope,you already start the planning and screening for some other individual to run off to.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/17 01:14 PM
1	High N Count debate "you maintain frame, stay dominant, acquire respect from her (she should fear losing you with the fear that no one will be as Chad-like as you), are confident in your dick delivering abilities and don't give a fuck about losing her" The guy describes casual sex or FWB situations.This has nothing to do with the concept of LTR.Why the fuck would you consider it a LTR if you have no feelings for her and you don't mind losing her.Casual sex is for sex,LTR are for more.	/r/askTRP	26/11/17 10:23 AM
2	Discussion: N-count. Buddy,promiscuity is promiscuity.I did not created the word but I will use it.You must be delusional if you think I'm gonna label a girl who went through 20 cocks as her "expressing sexuality".I do not buy that.She does not buy it herself.I already said it's about being on different spectrum .If they would not try to come on our spectrum,it will not be a problem.But they do.And then complain that they are no accepted.How that girl chooses to express her sexuality is her call.And it's actually go…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/17 07:13 AM
2	Discussion: N-count. Who the fucks ask directly about the number of dicks?You ask about the number of relationships and if she's done ONS or casual or fwb.You state that you don't.Simple as that.Or that you prefer the same number as you have.It's the man's choice.His preference. I did not stated "high".I stated nothing.Because I felt there was no need to.Because it's implied that since I do not agree to ONS or casual,my morals are not higher,but different. And no,it has nothing to do with insecurity.In most cases an…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/17 01:04 AM
1	Discussion: N-count. Eh,if she says something about "insecure or immature",it's pure bullshit. If she says that they have different values or views on sex,then it's okay.I doubt it though.And it seems to always be this exaggeration of how much they care.Like the way they phrased it makes me imagine some kind of pathetic man who ask from 5 to 5 min "what's your count,what's your count" not something like "Look,this is my view on relationships and sex,not into casual or a fan of promiscuity,so how do you fit in?" Is i…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/17 12:38 AM
1	Discussion: N-count. Because it's the only way they can defend themselves.You have to be an idiot to buy that line.We practically do no exist without a past.We would be blank slate.In what fucked up alternate timeline have we suddenly stopped being the sum of our choices? Yes you can maybe wake up one day and change.It still does not change what you've done.For example,I consider to have lost 2 years of my life to stupid games and tv series and being a lazy ass,I regret the hell of it,I still can't get it back. Anyw…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/17 12:22 AM
2	Discussion: N-count. Yea,I doubt those relationships were so "happy" if they were destroyed by a question of someone's sexual past.Please. It was most likely build on a lie.I can't imagine how if a woman or man ask about each other's count,found out it is 5~ each,and their relationships gets destroyed by it. On the other hand,finding about a 15+ partners when you likely mentioned 1 or refused to answer does not sit that well. As for why I wanna know,it's because I have a disgust for both ONS and casual sex.Thus,I wi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/11/17 12:13 AM
0	Discussion: N-count. It's funny when female on this forum call the ones concerned about their sexual past insecure.I almost have a good laugh. The thing I don't understand is: didn't the promiscuous girl herself chose the guy?She herself saw something in the man and he was most likely a confident guy,otherwise she would not even bat an eye to an insecure man.So does he suddenly become insecure or a loser when he asks about her sexual past? I can see someone being insecure in general also being insecure about her pas…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/11/17 10:17 AM
0	Discussion: N-count. Or they may simply enjoy this hedonistic life style.Which fits perfectly fine with them,but not with us.You can masturbate for pleasure or use toys to scratch that itch or whatever bullshit there is,I see no need to hop on the nearest dick.But it is not my place to decide that. What I find it annoying is that I've actually seen females on this forum come and have the guts to express that their promiscuity,their empowerment,their free thinking are somewhat the norm and that we are the ones actual…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/17 07:14 PM
2	Very very very simple question about N-count. This is for men in particular but women can respond too and give their thoughts. Sorry mate,it usually does not even get that far.The visceral disgust is enough to not think about the other concerns.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/17 07:55 PM
1	Q4BP: Do you disagree with the RP idea on women's tastes (CC with alpha, settle with beta later), or do you just disagree with how the later stage is bad for men? I think she does not take into consideration the kind of guys the sluts marry. Of course they may not have trouble finding a loser to marry,mostly because he wants sex. On the other hand,those awesome non-slutty woman may search a little more,but the type of guy they find is superior in every aspect to the loser.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/17 06:17 PM