midnightdreary8 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-3	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Hey, the truth went nowhere on this thread! Fascinatng, no one wanted to hear what was really going on! Th truth is right here - look at my posts. The rest is silly BS, But then again, no one will read this invisibilized thread. Who cares? On with your fantasy! Have fun!	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 10:43 AM
-1	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? Bull shit. You lie. Women do not currently vote like sheep for male dolts This is not true. Men do this, not women. Women are waking up. You don't mention that part. They are tired of voting for jerks. Ask women in Salinas California, ""We vote for Cesar, for his movement, for women". They discriiminate. They are not stupid. You hate people being equal. Equality of results is equality. Go away.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 10:12 AM
0	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? Who cares? men play their games, whatever. Think about it.Women historically have had nothing to do with it. That men need to restrict each other in the mad acquisition of power, is understood by women, indigenous people, black people, and on and on. How come oppressed men don't fight the men in power, instead of attacking the people who are subjugated to them and oppressed? Is it just easier? What?	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 09:57 AM
1	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? Oh come on. Can we get real for a sec? Feminists are not in power. What are these BS answers attempting to derail or lie about the situation? Feminists are not in power. Have fun.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 09:42 AM
1	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? Cuz feminists (aka woman) are not in power. Sure. I'll wait 5 minutes to make this statement, since it disposes of the question. Of course, I can't keep an identity here that lasts, since I would be killed as a woman. So I'm anon. Had that happen, won't let it happen again. Any other questions?	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 09:32 AM
-2	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? BS. You don't want to talk about why women aren't in power, feel free, otherwise stop derailing and talk about the topic. I notice jerks like you can only derail, but I hold out hope for you. Say something on topic or STFU.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 09:22 AM
0	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? Uh huh, Cite. Please . Prove. Please. Or STFU.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 09:10 AM
0	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? Why? Because I'm not corrupt? Got all the qualifications otherwise. Your objection?	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 08:59 AM
1	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Alisdair, you're weird. I see you post over and over (like five times) the same shit about a few women worldwide behaving badly. Uh huh, worldwide there are are some few women who behave badly. There are about a hundred thousand times as many men behaving badly. Please post, every time you post a woman behaving badly, all men dong the same thing. Or STFU, as Paul Elam puts it.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 08:48 AM
-5	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Interesting. Girls have no voice. Shut up. Girls have no voice. We are quite honest as a result. Think why you are lonely. Attempt to understand. Start over, ignoring the distortion threads here. Don't you get it Ya poor fucks.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 08:32 AM
1	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Ok. This is truth. Thank you. This sub could go. Feminism could go. The whole male-female war could go. I mean it. Feminism could go away forever. That's really what all this is about, isn't it? Men should just go back to being, yeah, world-controlling assholes. This is a magnificent statement. Let's pause a moment and contemplate it. This is maybe the most clear and brilliant statement of mens rights I have ever seen. Wow, The earthiness of the controlliness. Massive. The frackiness, the rapine…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 08:09 AM
-2	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? Why you stupid shit where do you get off attacking my intelligence? O. You musta figured I'm female. How dare i say something that doesn't fit your moronic world view? Who else would care about how your male establishment is wiping out the earth? It must seem strange, having an intelligent woman attempting to communicate with someone as deficient as you are. Got it. What could I possibly say. Have fun. My law degree, that kinda stuff, nothing, cuz i'm female. Got it! Your degrees please, your su…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 07:45 AM
1	Punishment for adultery in Afghanistan somehow women's rights issue when law affects both sexes. Men are violent to other men, yawn. I don't dare find out what happened to the poor girl victim. She didn't do anything but of course she had to be tortured. He did it to her. Wonder if he thought about what what would happen to her. Doubtful. No matter. She was probably tortured to death, but let's not talk about her. So...what happened to her? Stoned, exiled, what?	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 07:31 AM
-8	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Be careful about male projections regarding the actions of young women.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 07:19 AM
-17	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development You have no idea what I'm talking about? Well read me again. And stop giving me bullshit comments. BTW I am a girl if that helps you understand I speak from a position of authority.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 07:09 AM
-11	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development You may not, being male. Why feel unsafe, ya dude? Nobody ever made you feel like you were being followed home and some insane dude was never ever going to get over getting into your house to hurt you? Well ya dolt this is how it is for women. So I don't know what to say here. Women of course are frightened shitless by male intrusions when they try to shop, walk, have a life, whatever. But creepiness, man, it's unfair, man...women should shut up and take it man...	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 06:59 AM
-9	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Cool, who? Can't wait to hear your authoritative source to tell us that gay people as well as non-gay people can tell who is gay. Otherwise, please do some reading about lbgt concerns.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 06:46 AM
-20	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development No. It's a lot more deep-seated than that. You better start giving the girls a little credit. They know the guys to stay away from. Girls aren't stupid. They see the boys who aren't going to be boyfriends. Because they are pornsick already, addicts, controlistas, non-workers, bores, but most especially,the ones who have stupid ideas that will never make any money. Girls do, yes, have instincts.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 06:35 AM
-1	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? This is worth responding to, barely, mountain goat. Let's see. Men are in power cuz it gets them laid. Women don't get laid, fuck their needs whatever those may be. So it's about men getting laid, not the earth getting destroyed with global warming, the incessant warfare, etc. Got it. It's about your stupid sex life. But onward. Bring in women and they will start whinging about crap like saving the fucking earth. Gah. how boring. And they have no tits, at least they won't show them. Civilization…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 06:24 AM
-17	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Again, it's not attractiveness. I bet you've seen plenty of unattractive boys and happy girls get together. It's no social norm. Creepiness is different. It's a self-protective instinct in a girl or woman. Creepiness is a lead-in to male violence/controlism and every girl knows it and tries to stay away.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 06:08 AM
-7	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Keep checkin, mon ami. The way people persist in maintaining a losing position never ceases to amaze me. Learn from this. :)	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 05:58 AM
-9	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Uh huh. Nongaydude, please check with gay dude regarding this.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 05:48 AM
-14	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Sorry. You're wrong. People do have instincts, and the "creepy" instinct women have is one. Female elephants, female mammals all over the world have these instincts and are careful in their movements relative to the males around them. Women of course have instincts regarding men that men don't. And yes, a lot of men are dangerous. Men are much more dangerous to women and other men than women are to men. Feel free to cite scientific research showing that I do not speak truth in saying that these …	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 05:38 AM
-13	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Lotta gay people as well as non-gay women and men know who's gay. So? Guess I'd say, good. Good to know who's who when you're looking for a partner.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 05:27 AM
-6	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Charming. You dumb drunk bitch. Because you stepped on her heel. Creeepalicious.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 05:14 AM
-12	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development No misuse. I think creepy and unwholesome are synonymous. That's the ultimate definition. A creepy person (and women can be creepy) has secrets, is sick, is hiding things, is putting on a face, is false, is covering something up, is trying not to let you see something disgusting about them. Women understand this word very specifically. It's a protection from men who are sick in some way. It's not about coming on too strong. It's about a vibe they send out. That said, some men get mislabeled that…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 04:57 AM
-13	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Sorry, instincts are. Women feel you. Somebody will do a study someday, how animals prick up their ears and go fuck, there's a problem here. I think some "creepy" men aren't creepy, but are presenting themselves as such. That can be fixed. But some men reveal themselves as spooky within five minutes, definitely. A lot of men are dangerous. I think women pick this up. A lot of men who on any objective scale are unattractive have great lives and marriages. Physical attractiveness is not what I'm t…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 04:47 AM
-12	Tumblr is at it again. Men's rights activism is about harassing feminists. Not aware of any organized campaigns to silence men. Am aware of organized campaigns to silence women. Your cites? It's simple to stop the complaining from women about being harassed. Stop telling women, show tits or stfu. And softer equivalents. Yeah, come down hard every time that is said. Make it unspeakable. And don't dox women who say things avfm doesn't like. Avfm marshals around 200 men for their gang-rape character assassinations and doxxings. If this sub links to them, this sub is invol…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 04:36 AM
-18	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Sometimes women know instinctively that the man they are talking to is unwholesome; whether he's pornsick, has some other unfortunate sex proclivities, is desperate, is hiding some other secret, or whatever, it shines like a stoplight. Women do have some instincts about this. A "creepy" man has to have a long hard look at what he is; he is spooking the women he meets, and he may have a problem that he has to fix. The answer is def not to tell women to accept "creepy" men.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 04:22 AM
-5	[Question] If feminists are the ones in power, why are such a huge majority of people in congress and in administrative positions men? Because feminists are not the ones in power.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 04:10 AM
5	Shared maternity leave in the UK: Fathers get to share maternity leave with the mother of their child. Sounds good, right? Yes. But for the wrong reasons. Ok, thanks, I get your position. You argue that the government is doing this for the wrong reasons. I still argue that bad intent, if any, shouldn't be laid at feminists' feet, but at the governments'. I think feminists in the UK see the benefit for men and will applaud it. Would like to hear from others on this.	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 01:15 AM
1	A feminist argument against child support Veddy interesting. The argument is, take the burden off men who want to abandon their children, but don't put the burden on the mothers either, put it on the state. Make the state support the child, with all of our tax dollars, and the fathers go free. The article also points out that if fathers' child support is abandoned as a legal principle, there will be a big increase in abortions. And of course, she doesn't say this, but what about visitation, fathers developing relationships with their ki…	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 01:04 AM
4	Shared maternity leave in the UK: Fathers get to share maternity leave with the mother of their child. Sounds good, right? Yes. But for the wrong reasons. I see your argument. But it leaves out the possibility that men may want to care for their babies and welcome that opportunity. Are men just safe pairs of hands, or fathers? Is the government, and are feminists, entirely oblivious to this desire of men, and need of children? I don't think so, not entirely. And the original intent, no matter how bad, may not mean anything when the eventual result is examined. Why not just celebrate this instead of making it a paranoid conspiracy for once?	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 12:39 AM
5	Shared maternity leave in the UK: Fathers get to share maternity leave with the mother of their child. Sounds good, right? Yes. But for the wrong reasons. Guess I'm just asking, so what if it was primarily to help mothers, and fathers got the same benefit because of egalitarian principles? You said, "If men look after the child sometimes, the women can be at work." I responded. "I don't see that reasoning as being getting women back to work - it keeps men from work, so that's not logical." Bottom line, you don't want this excellent thing to be considered feminist work helping men. But it is.	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 12:24 AM
5	Shared maternity leave in the UK: Fathers get to share maternity leave with the mother of their child. Sounds good, right? Yes. But for the wrong reasons. So what? Indirectly, feminists have helped men here. I know so many men who would love the chance to get to know their babies. They needed some kind of recognition that yes, it's now ok to stay home with and bond with your baby. They get to take leave now and hang out with their babies, and it's sanctioned. The government always has its own profit-making reasons - screw it. I don't see that reasoning as being getting women back to work - it keeps men from work, so that's not logical. Anyway, the…	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 12:11 AM
2	Highlights From The Gender-Neutral Swedish Toys “R” Us Catalog - Why can't we be more like Sweden? This strikes me as an excellent experiment. Why not just watch and see what happens? Will kids go androgenous, or differentiate themselves?	/r/MensRights	29/11/13 11:57 PM
8	Shared maternity leave in the UK: Fathers get to share maternity leave with the mother of their child. Sounds good, right? Yes. But for the wrong reasons. You mean because feminist work benefited fathers here? So what? Why not just give them credit for doing something that does work for egalitarian reasons, and BTW benefits children? I wouldn't say it was coincidental. This is fantastic. The U.S.A is light years from this.	/r/MensRights	29/11/13 11:45 PM
2	Punishment for adultery in Afghanistan somehow women's rights issue when law affects both sexes. Here's a case where a guy did dig himself out: http://voices.yahoo.com/death-stoning-iran-2498748.html That's how it works, historically. The men have a sporting chance to dig themselves out. Like I said, I'm not aware of any case where a woman ever has, not with her arms buried.	/r/MensRights	29/11/13 10:46 PM
2	Punishment for adultery in Afghanistan somehow women's rights issue when law affects both sexes. First, it's a proposal, the stoning law hasn't been reinstated yet in Afghanistan. Second, if it's based on the Iranian stoning law, it won't affect both sexes equally: http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/11/20/graphic-anatomy-of-a-stoning/ The icing on the discriminatory cake, as I already said in a post here 2 days ago about Iran's patriarchy, is Article 103 of the Iranian Penal Code, which gives the victim a chance to dig out, which the man often can, cuz he's only buried to his waist. The woma…	/r/MensRights	28/11/13 07:07 PM
1	The myth of patriarchal oppression in Iran Speaking of nonames, my sources do have names and facts and cites to the Iranian Penal Code. Here's more on the organization I cite. Note the fact that people like Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, John Bolton, and Howard Dean, to name a few US officials who know something about Iran, have spoken favorably about this organization. ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_Resistance_of_Iran And you haven't said a word about the facts in the article I cite, or the stoning law I cited. And your…	/r/MensRights	26/11/13 12:12 AM
1	The myth of patriarchal oppression in Iran Here you are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoning It's in the Iranian Penal Code. There's a footnote to a pdf in the wiki article that gives you the precise cite. So, your guy's qualification, that he lives in Iran, outweighs two highly-internationally regarded experts on the political situation in Iran, because they opposed the Shah? And how about all the facts in the article? All false? And up in the comments that haven't been voted to invisibility yet, like this one, you or another sockpupp…	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 07:18 PM
-4	The myth of patriarchal oppression in Iran My favorite fact about gender relations in Iran is always the one about how men can only be buried up to their waists for stoning, while women are buried up to their necks. The men dig themselves out. The women, not hardly. Then of course the rule is that if you can dig yourself out you won't be killed... Oh and BTW, who wrote the AVFM article? His expert qualifications are what?	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 01:34 AM
0	The myth of patriarchal oppression in Iran Since you ask, here's an article written by an Iranian woman, to be fair. http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/mhviran.htm	/r/MensRights	24/11/13 11:34 PM
-12	The myth of patriarchal oppression in Iran These guys just get funnier and funnier! Ahahahahah! The religious police are even laughing at this nonsense! What's next? "Women Revealed to Be Chimps"?	/r/MensRights	24/11/13 11:20 PM
-4	Barret Weber is anti-Semitic. It's funny, the naivete of some of the posters here. Like the earnest commenter named Cuze here. Let's think. Why would AVFM so clumsily make such a shocking assertion, then later say I'm only playin' wit ya? Hmm. Is AVFM just silly and clumsy, or does AVFM calculatedly intend to injure the person this way? Could it be that now and for years to come, when anybody looks up this guy's name on google, he's going to have as his first result that he is an anti-Semite? Check it out. It's already happe…	/r/MensRights	23/11/13 03:00 AM