TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mik123mik1 Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by mik123mik1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Its the betrayal of your trust. You get into a relationship with the expectation of monogamy (unless explicitly discussed otherwise). Also, the people that cheat and come back to you not because you are better, but because you are being used for something.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:26 PM
4

Well, the mother was getting a restraining order because he kept showing up at her house and he said he was showing up at her house, but because the custody agreement wasn't being enforced. Thats when the judge said what I mentioned and she said never mind about the restraining order. Edit: that is quite literally al the info I have, I wasn't involved, I was just in the court that day
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:22 AM
7

So, to be specific, what I mean is even if you get 50-50 custody, if the mother doesn't allow the father to see the kids the cops will just shrug. I've not personally experienced this, but I watched it happen to several people. I saw a case happen live in court for restraining orders in where the judge warned the mother that the cops would start enforcing the custody order if she got the restraining order
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:07 AM
6

FL doesn't enforce shared custody unless forced to with a restraining order from what I've seen
/r/MensRights19/06/25 11:53 PM
5

So, you are blaming men for the system setup and contributed to by everyone and thats fine according to you, but pointing out that men are not the only ones that build the system we are in is blaming women apparently? Is this women blaming in the room with us right now? Also, you proved my point that you don't want to know how the world actually works and just want to hurt men lol. Do you even know what the QoL metrics are? Anyone with half an effort to learn about them knows women live longer, …
/r/MensRights17/03/25 02:32 PM
9

And whoever designed the system doesn't matter because it changes constantly, keep up. It can be currently designed against men and not have been in the past, and who created the system that is against men is whoever was in the system at the time the changes took place. Now, "my point when asking that question is shifting the blame to women is dimb" agreed, no one did that tho so your point is not just wrong, but irrelevant as well. The system is so against women that they are doing better than …
/r/MensRights17/03/25 03:25 AM
13

Guess slavery from the 1700s was fine, black people from Africa helped make that system, so its perfectly fine they were treated horribly right? There is a lot more wrong with this one question and all it implies, but a few more examples of how stupid that question it; systems are not set in stone and constantly being modified by those inside it... including women. Also the fact that none of the people here are likely to be involved in the creation of the system against men.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 01:57 AM
11

Answer the question. Where did I blame all women? EDIT: Womens distrust of men is just as irrational as my istrust of women. A woman with a knife can kill me without me even having a chance to fight back, doesn't mean they will. EDIT 2 crickets
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:49 PM
17

Where did I blame all women for the actions of my exs or the women in those articles? Point it out, because I am 100% sure i did no such thing. Nor do I think anyone was obligated to do anything about the women abusing me, nor am I angry at all women. I dont trust women, there is a difference. I also understand that my lack of trust is irrational and do my best to get past it, unlike the women that go on to blame all men for their past and say that men as a whole are to blame because they didn't…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:46 PM
20

Your logic is so fuckin flawed I dont know where to start. Most criminals, are repeat offenders. There. Your logic is fucking gone with that one sentence. But let's continue anyway, men are victims of sexual assault at about te same rate as women, with a similar victimization by women as men if you exclude prison rape (i am actually stealmanning your argument by ignoring prison rape, since it makes men mauch more likely to be victims than women). You are not calling out men to do better, because…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:37 PM
24

No, you are part of the problem by shifting blame for those few evil men to all men. EDIT: so you're motive of moving from a movement with legitimate issues they are fighting againsr to a movement which perpetuates those issues was because you were alone... that is not the positive thing you spin it to be.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:13 PM
33

"Until all men stand up..." you are a walking stereotype. What is it feminists say? "Women don't owe men anything"? Im going to use their logic, men don't owe women anything. They are not owed me protecting them from the very rare disgusting person. Now using more reasonable logic... group blame never works out the way you want. The more group blame you put on innocent people, the more angry they will get. You say you understand why people here are angry (you're wrong at the target, most people …
/r/MensRights13/11/24 12:58 PM
8

Women are, infact, able to get abortions so your second sentence shows your entire premise to be based off of something false. Also, women can legally abandon their children to the state, so even should she bring the child to term, she doesn't have to pay any child support unless she decides to and the courts allow the father to be a father and she makes less than the father. But, let's answer with your question of if men would be allowed abortions if they got pregnant. If we used current laws a…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 01:05 PM
8

How is having a child not the woman's choice when she has every opportunity to not give birth? And your hypothetical is unrelated.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 12:43 PM
11

Women pay child support when they choose to because having a child is entirely their choice.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 12:21 PM
2

Correction, the Duluth model was made by not just a woman co-founder, but iirc the entire group was feminists.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:20 AM
1

Well, there is good evidence that part of the reason we were able to evolve and support such large brains is because we cook our food... so that part probably isn't nonsense but everything else is yeah
/r/MensRights05/11/23 08:21 PM
28

They will find their manpower removing themselves from existence before joining a draft
/r/MensRights30/10/23 11:31 PM
8

What is slavery? Is forcing people to work against their will? Would a guy coming to my house with a bunch of armed people telling me im going to leave and do work or else, would that be slavery?
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:37 PM
7

There are, and none of them are proposed by feminists.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 04:19 PM
7

Myself and a lot of other autistic men I know all want to live for as long as possible, its not cause we are less miserable, just more stubborn and routine bound. It is hard to build a routine that involves offing yourself
/r/MensRights19/06/23 04:21 PM
10

All previous research confirming the hypothesis that foreskin is soft and breaks easily during sex should be thrown out?? Are they false?? https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/28/circumcision-prevents-hiv-infection-medical-myth note the BMJ is a reputable medical journal and it cites many MANY sources. everywhere else only references the several observational studies done in africa which all had very glaring methodology issues. BUT! let's hypothetically say that you are right and that it d…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:37 PM
9

It is all bodily autonomy. All of it. Most forms of FGM are no more risky than circumcision, but are treated as heinous because they violate the girls bodily autonomy. See, societies all value women's bodily autonomy far higher than men's. If you don't believe me, tell me how many societies have a draft system for women/both vs just for men.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:14 PM
10

Yes. Yes it does. Your risk of infection in any part of your body increases when it is not cleaned. Germ theory has been around for a long time now.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:11 PM
16

The HIV study was shown to be false. The risk of utis is from people who don't clean. Removing any part of the body lowers your chances of cancer. It absolutely does not protect against inflammation of the glans, and a piece of you that is no longer attached cannot be inflamed. So how about we remove your pinky toes and pinky fingers? That will reduce your chances of cancer and prevent injury and inflammation! No one has a problem with people choosing to be circumcised, but here in America and m…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 02:56 PM
3

Fortunately, for the first question, im autistic. That means that is socially unacceptable to hate me openly. Second question tho... I was taught from a young age by my grandmother that men are looked down on and vulnerable to malicious women from a young age (not as in she taught me the hard way, she spelled it out for me before I actually understood). Always telling me not to be along with a girl because she can say one thing and ruin my life easily for instance. Altho she never explicitly sai…
/r/MensRights11/04/23 12:33 AM
1

This is the UK, none of them have the weapons to fight their government, even butter knives are illegal there lol
/r/MensRights24/03/23 08:52 PM
12

Well, they don't have the 'right' to have the government decide that they get to murder and be murdered in some far off country, so yeah, they mostly have the same rights lol
/r/MensRights24/02/23 06:35 PM
1

No, but all of my relationships have had withheld affection (to the point that I've never had sex while in a relationship) as part of abuse towards me if that counts
/r/MensRights18/01/23 04:54 PM
1

Neither can be taken seriously. At one point Peterson said that men who are abused constantly are to blame for their own abuse.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 04:44 PM
2

The world's oldest profession isn't becoming normal, its been normal for almost all of human history to a greater or lesser extent, hence the name. Also, selling pictures of yourself is far different from fucking strangers for money.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 05:43 AM
2

I dont think you understood my point. If any men turned into women it wouldn't be any more soul crushing to be an of model than being a man, and if we had the choice to be paid while not really working in exchange for dealing with what we are already dealing with but not as servere, we would all gladly take it. In fact, for many men it would be a massive improvement as their jobs are stressful and difficult. Its not self destructive to have massive improvement in lifestyle just because you could…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:48 AM
3

You do realize men are already treated as such? All men are seen as rapists in waiting, are treated as rapists in waiting, and many even believe they are rapists in waiting, so, for men there would be no difference.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:38 AM
10

Having the people around you be resentful of your wealth and not feeling like you earned it is not worse than being poor.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:05 AM
11

As someone that used to live mildly in poverty and then didn't, And now does again, he is correct. Having money makes life 100x easier and if I could easily get money by being an exhibitionist online is be more than happy to do so. Speaking of exhibitionism, some people would really enjoy showing themselves online for money.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 11:01 PM
2

Not true, not having sex is a 100% effective BC method
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:53 PM
7

You seem to be pretty openly disagreeing with us and not being banned for someone disagreeing in a subreddit that apparently has a non-existent commitment to free speech because of people using terms you think are dumb.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:42 PM
9

First of all I have a master’s degree, so you don’t need to explain to me what antidotal (correct spelling for you there) I dont believe you, as antidotal means involving an antidote, or a cure for poison, and anecdotal involves an anecdote, or a small story.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:53 PM
6

1836 is recent? or if you want to be conservative, 1875? It isn't recently that women have been allowed to go to college, its been almost 200 years. thats like 6 generations, its not been only 50 years. "It’s amazing how men put their thumb down on women for so many hundreds of years and that women are taking these amazing Opportunities." That is not true. Do you know who has the power in influencing society? the ones in charge of children. The development of the foundation of your worldview is …
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:11 PM
3

I'm not going by anecdotal evidence, im going by statistics that can be easily found with a quick search altho if I were to go with anecdotal evidence, my mother is a theater major, my youngest sister an art major, my middle sister is a teaching major, my aunt is a philosophy major, my other aunt is another teaching major and my great aunt is a nurse. Also, why are you glad that women are disproportionately going to college? Should we not be aiming for proportional college degrees?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:10 PM
15

The term "more likely" doesn't mean "almost always" it means compared to some other group, one outcome is more likely. About 70% of literature and theater degrees are women, very low value degrees, about 55% are gender studies, another low value degree, about 89% of social work degrees are women, a moderately low value degree, between 96% and 89% (depending on specialization) in teaching, a moderately low value degree. (Low value in this context meaning few to no jobs available based on that deg…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:02 PM
5

I dont think it actually matters, not specifically that body positivity is pushed for women and not men, but rather the whole body positivity thing is stupid. Being large isn't something to be aiming for or proud of and anyone who tries to say it is is either trying to kill people via the many issues that arise from being overweight or is willfully ignorant of the many many problems obesity causes. I dont think any of the female models before the body positivity were healthy either, but making t…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:37 AM
13

If someone punches someone and says to some 3rd party "you should stop being violent!" Its projecting, when the 3rd party says the same thing, its not projecting. Do you see the difference here? The exact same phrase can be said by two different people and one can be projecting and the other not. Even if some MRAs say it, we can prove with empirical evidence that men have fewer rights and privileges than women in nearly, if not actually, every aspect of life in the western world. Feminist cannot…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:25 PM
10

...and you completely ignore my point. If by default one group is believed when accusing another group, it is bad because it leeds to issues like Emmett till. Any group can be in either position in that situation and it is still equally fucked. And don't accuse me of sitting idly by while someone get abused because you don't like my opinion of equality. If anyone says they are abused by anyone, and they have evidence of said abuse, I'd believe them. Believe all women is just as bunk when against…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:38 PM
14

"Believe all women" is a feminist phrase. Just because racism is the cause of the case with Emmett till doesn't mean it can't be used to show the flaws in an ideology touting the same ideas that led to horrible things.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 09:11 PM
2

Yeah, I dont even know how many kids watch cops, I only did cause my grandparents are bootlickers and they watched it every time it came on
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:08 AM
17

When I was a child I was watching cops with my grandparents. I saw a man who had the cops called on him because he was loitering. The cops showed up and he was covered in red marks that looked like slaps and hits. He said he was only out there to get away from his wife hitting him. They went to his house and asked his wife and she was spotless. No evidence of anything used against her. She said he was the abusive one and he was instantly arrested. My grandparents didn't think anything was off wi…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 09:49 PM
6

No, if what is said is the truth its not defamation, its protected speech.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 04:39 AM
30

They get deleted by mods usually, so they are hard to find
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:43 PM
11

https://allthatsinteresting.com/american-men-rape-victims I cant pull up the scientific journal article cited in this, because its behind a paywall, but according to the article, 1.267 million men were victims of sexual assalt/rape in 2016, when the study was done, and it looks like 68.6% of those were women perpetrators. and in the forced envolopment catagory of rape, instead of just forced penetration, it goes up to 79.2%. which means that female perpetrators and male victims happened 869k tim…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:22 PM
5

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-system https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/1996/96sec2.pdf (The PDF is cited by a BBC article https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45565684 )
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:09 PM
11

When a woman sticks a penis inside her, it's called enveloping. If done via force or coercion, its rape according to reality, not UK law.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:05 PM
7

The FBI and RAINN. according to the FBI, 8% are proven false, and according to RAINN out of every 310 reports, only 28 are convicted, meaning thats how many are proven true, as thats what being convicted means. That is 9%
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:04 PM
13

You do know that a woman forcefully enveloping a man is ALSO rape right? Not according to UK law, but in reality.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:49 PM
1

No, in most urban areas, not just the really expensive to live in ones, people are getting paid a lot for fast food work, I live in a city with a lower than average living cost for the entire country and I make 30k a year working full time at a fast food place
/r/MensRights12/01/22 03:35 PM
41

Yes, we expect you to support claims with evidence.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:58 PM
1

each individual case IS equally important in that instance, but statistics isn't about individual cases, its about overall information. ignoring part of the information that would be needed to get accurate statistics is manipulation. the more context data has the more useful the statistics it is used for would be ​ EDIT: you seem to be misunderstanding the terminology. important and significant are very different when talking about statistics. significant has to do with a percentage of a data se…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:38 AM
3

What? If there are 100000 people and 50 are killed, each of those deaths are statistically more significant compared to if there are 1000000 people and 50 are killed. Statistical significance is one of the basics of statistical analysis. No one is saying that those 50/1000000 are less valuable, they just arent as significant of an impact to the data.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 12:58 AM
5

Call men who fight for the rights of men pathetic weaklings Get told to fuck themselves use getting insulted as an excuse to disregard everything said and call everyone who disagrees with you incels good plan! now you don't have to think critically about your positions and how the citations proved the other guy's point!
/r/MensRights13/06/20 04:20 AM
1

I'm saying that some group typically being associated with something by the mainstream means absolutely nothing. I'm not saying they are the same or even similar other than both are hated by most people and that the reason they are hated is the same, claims of misogyny. Any group that says anything negative about feminists are branded misogynists, and most likely arent. I've met one incel who hated women in general, I've met many who dont. The random definition you found on google means nothing.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 03:09 AM
3

What? How is that, in any way, related to what I just said?
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:59 AM
5

"Typically associated" great, not only does that prove my point, but MRAs are typically associated with misogyny, does that make it true?
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:56 AM
2

That is not what an incel is. At all. There are some incels like that sure, but that's not an accurate description of incels in general.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:51 AM
8

They can sign away their parental rights, yes. However that just means they are never given custody. They still are financially responsible for the children
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:04 PM
3

Even if civilians are counted, which they should be but the data about civilian fatalities in wars is hard to find, men would still be the vast majority of deaths
/r/MensRights12/06/19 04:19 PM
3

Ahh, ok. So I wasnt crazy, just blind and on my phone. Google is annoying to use on mobile
/r/MensRights06/06/19 06:59 PM
6

I remember reading it, but I cant find it now. Either I just cant find it or it was removed for inaccurate information from wherever it was
/r/MensRights06/06/19 04:15 PM
10

They instigated the thing, they didnt just play a role
/r/MensRights06/06/19 03:35 PM
4

When I was young, before I learned how to deal with my autism to some extent, I was very violent. Apparently, that is also very common. I would get bullied and it wouldn't take all that much for me to become overwhelmed and start lashing out. So good on the kid for holding back as long as he did.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 02:36 PM
0

"there are many cows that are blue" "can you point out some blue cows?" "Lots of cows are blue" That didn't answer their question edit: good job whoever downvoted this
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 05:11 PM
1

Holy hell, I didn't know there were more tiers than there were blood types (with the same letter scheme too). Now if only that writer didn't portray gammas as rapists. That'd be nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 09:12 PM
14

YOU ABLEIST! THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO USED TO BE IN IRON LUNGS #CHECKYOURPRIVALEGE
/r/MGTOW07/12/16 08:18 PM
2

I thought your name was Buckleberry Ferry and I was about to throw a LotR reference at you.
/r/MGTOW07/11/16 09:07 PM
2

there are about 21 times the number of non-Muslims in the UK as Muslims. so non-Muslims ONLY commit 5x more rapes than Muslims means Muslims commit more fucking rape. In order for that 5x more rapes to NOT show that Muslims rape more the muslim population would need to be about 17% instead of fucking 5% EDIT: also, the prejudice is founded on your ass being male, not Muslim m8.
/r/MGTOW07/11/16 09:02 PM
8

I might be autistic but I think I see some sarcasm dripping from that statement.
/r/MGTOW07/11/16 05:26 PM
2

Thats true. Although with my particular situation, my song was perfect. She really was a cunt and it was only 6 months later after a 3 year relationship.
/r/MGTOW05/11/16 01:56 AM
2

Not a big fan of country music, otherwise I'd prolly know that one.
/r/MGTOW05/11/16 01:41 AM
2

that's not anywhere near as impactful however.
/r/MGTOW05/11/16 12:12 AM
8

That was my reply to my most recent ex after 6 months later she messages me and tells me the guy she cheated on me with heated on her. Except I didn't say it with words. Me and her had a game when we were dating that if a song could say what we anted to better than words could wed send that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0doSWS0Fj24
/r/MGTOW04/11/16 09:24 PM
3

I've actually noticed that if a guy in this situation goes from a 7 to a 5 it makes the 7 feel even worse.
/r/MGTOW02/11/16 07:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter