TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mika_running Archive

View 0 posts and 125 comments by mika_running on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

None of the apps work. It’s their business model to get you to pay ans then trap you there. Get you feeling you’re just a few swipes away. And also to allow all the bots and fuckboys because they get attention, no matter what the apps say about trying to get rid of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 01:00 PM
8

Gay or not, put that same exact profile on grindr and he’ll get messages daily.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 12:55 PM
1

Yes they are. But the “everyone should be passport bros” reeks of colonialism.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 05:01 PM
1

But it’s wrong to ruin things for local men in developing countries at the expense of wealthier western men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 04:21 PM
1

All this does is shift the problem. These men become desirables but it displaces locals. The same percentage of men still suffer, we just don’t see it from our privileged position in developed world.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:54 PM
–

I think most men would want a virgin, all else being equal. Who wouldn’t want a girl who sees you, and only you, as se sexually desirable that she lost herself for you. But all else isn’t equal. There are three main reasons why a girl might be a virgin beyond a certain age: 1) moral belief in waiting until marriage, 2) she’s too ugly to get laid, 3) low sex drive/asexual. Now think about dating one of these girls. The first one is usually highly religious, and unless you’re also of that religion…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:56 AM
2

This question again. Of course she wants male (and female) attention. The difference is she only wants attention from the men she finds attractive. The others are “harassment” even if their messages as more friendly than the “alpha” (in her mind) who leads with “hey babe wanna fuck”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:55 PM
2

You really underestimate how bad the jobs market is today. Employees don’t have anywhere near the power that employers have.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:25 AM
0

It’s more autistic if you can’t read her signals to determine whether she wants it or not. It breaks the natural flow and even if she previously wanted it, she probably no longer does after asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 03:35 PM
4

Yep, no better way to kill the mood than to ask for permission. As a man, that’s part of the burden we carry. We have to read the mixed signals and determine whether she wants it or not. And the consequences for guessing “yes” when it’s “no” are severe, so many men don’t even bother trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 03:32 PM
5

There are some terrible people exploiting all these lonely young men, and they should be held responsible for the consequences of what they say. However, no one seems to address the technological, social, and legal changes that have contributed to this increase in male loneliness that the grifters are exploiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 07:17 AM
1

Or the man is gay. I’ve seen this one in real life. Chad looking dude getting chased by women and turning them down, later he comes out as gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 07:24 AM
2

Pre-selection doesn’t equal body count. You can ramp up body count by sleeping with hookers all the time. That’s meaningless. The most desired men are the ones who women are chasing but the men don’t give it up easily. That way, if he does give it up to her, she’s special and not just another notch in the bed post.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:48 PM
2

Every man’s dream is the good girl he turned bad. The one untouched by any other man but because he was so perfect she gave in and lost herself to him and has no desires for anyone except him. Of course this is just a fantasy for all but a few top men who have the ability to make women lose themselves like this. If not possible, men will settle. For sex just go for someone perceived as easy and hot enough to make it worth (men are pretty unpicky here). For relationship a good girl is generally p…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:17 AM
0

Fair enough, just my personal experience speaking. Best of luck regardless
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 10:05 PM
4

Honestly the secret is living apart. Once you move in together, sex becomes too easy and less desirable. But if you’re apart, it builds tension while you’re away and once you meet you go wild like animals. But I wish you the best of luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 09:32 PM
34

It’s very easy for a small number of men, and nearly impossible for the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 05:15 PM
–

Women clearly are attracted some misogynists, though. It may be a negative trait, but not negative enough to overcome other desires. Many women will choose the hot misogynist over the ugly respectful man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 07:54 PM
3

A lot of guys have a tough time distinguishing flirting from friendliness/just being kind, leading to these sorts of situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 12:26 PM
-1

Well hey there chad
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 12:52 PM
50

And even then, it’s usually just virtue signaling rather than genuine openness. Giving a single date to some minorities and claiming they have no racial preferences, but they always seem to end up with the white guy, hmm
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 09:57 AM
1

The simps in relationships are typically in transactional relationships, and will never feel how it feels to be desired for something other than what they can provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 10:48 AM
5

But it made most men need to put on a song and dance to win a women’s attention, and the women still ignore most of these men because someone else offered more. Not too far off from Simping.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 10:44 AM
3

Western women didn’t give these guys any attention anyway. And despite the whinging, probably benefit from these guys not being here because then they won’t get hit on by them. And then guys find happiness, so it’s a win win?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 02:22 PM
2

At the end of the day, everything is ROI. I work because what they pay me is worth the effort I put in. Same goes for my interactions with people (not just women), with exceptions for close family who I view as an extended part of myself. I have a million things I can do in my short life, so why waste time with those who aren’t worth it. And that doesn’t only mean sex, but for women I’m attracted to, that’s a big part of it. And yes, I somehow do have a career and a girlfriend. I choose them bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 06:55 AM
2

It’s the effect vs reward ratio. Simping is giving so much and getting almost nothing in return. Like the losers fancy gifts for women who clearly aren’t interested to try to change their mind. I’m not opposed to some gift buying or treating women, but it has to be proportional to what I’m getting in return. Maybe earning it is the wrong phrase. I more mean, she needs to have a passion towards me, then the sex is good. I “earned” it by being a high quality man who she desired, not just a transac…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 06:38 AM
6

Might just be me speaking, but paying for sex doesn’t make me feel like I earned it, and there’s no passion or excitement there, just fulfilling a raw need. And if that’s the case. I’d rather just watch porn for free or even use my imagination instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 01:29 PM
6

Wow, incel as insult? So unique! I’m not slut shaming. It could apply to any behaviour, cooking, spending time together, and so on. If she’s willing to do that for someone else and not me, she’s clearly not as into me, and settling. I’m also not insecure. I’m perfectly fine on my own, and wouldn’t accept a woman who isn’t attracted to me. Although I do have a lovely girlfriend who does so much for me that she’s never done for other guys, thanks for asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:22 PM
5

How is it unfair to want something from a partner that she clearly gave to others? If she’s not giving it to you, she’s settling. Sure, you can go for that if you want, but don’t you deserve better?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 07:37 PM
7

That’s so passive and unattractive though. That paper is going right in the bin, if not just left on the machine. You’ve got to do it with rizz. And the only way to do that is to be hot, or extremely confident and cool. If you’re just average, don’t bother.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 08:09 AM
14

Not everyone is an extrovert though. For introverts, this is really draining and there’s only so much we can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 02:53 PM
0

Simps gonna simp. But in all seriousness, we try to raise men’s standards through movements like red pill and MGTOW, and we just get called sexist for it, but somehow independent women gets praised. What else can we do?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 10:56 PM
3

A sign of high openness and a general lack of stability. Great for a fling because it’s fun, not great for a long term relationship because she will get bored quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 05:04 PM
11

Yeah good point hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 08:29 PM
17

It’s quite sexy honestly, but it is a red flag (although not a deal breaker) for long term dating
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 08:23 PM
2

The people who would be good parents generally don’t want kids, and the people who would be horrible parents generally have many.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:47 AM
7

Did she say it from the start? Or was this something that she gradually began to say once the relationship became more serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 09:41 PM
–

I have to disagree with this. Why do we exist as humans? From a biological standpoint, it's to pass on our DNA. For humans, this means having sex, there's no way around it. Therefore, other than immediate survival concerns, like get out of the way of that oncoming bus, our drive for sex is extremely strong, on par with drives like hunger and thirst. Other emotions that spur us in the direction of sex, like love, can also be just as strong. If we claim having food and drink as human rights, why s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 01:07 PM
2

What do you expect them to do? For these men, their options are to simp and get some female attention or not simp and get no female attention. For most of them, they are playing their bad hand optimally.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 06:09 PM
1

Ugh, there’s nothing more boring than when I ask women what their hobbies are and all of them are passive (watching movies, listening to music, or the worst, browsing TikTok).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 06:18 PM
3

Yep, that’s why I didn’t date her or give her my address!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:40 PM
1

I had a friends with benefits kinda thing with a bipolar girl I wasn’t all that attracted to but she was really wild in bed, so I kept her on call. In multiple occasions she blew up my phone, asking me to come over, saying she needs my dick, she misses me, etc., basically like the incel men when they get rejected by women, minus the “I never liked you, you slutty bitch” part at the end. I know for sure once she was drunk and I’m pretty sure she was drunk the other time too. I didn’t engage becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:59 PM
2

I feel like I go through three phases 1) wanting a stable and comfortable relationship with someone who loves me and will always be there for me 2) wanting to flirt with many different women and be a bit wild 3) wanting to ignore women entirely and focus on myself (my hobbies, career, etc.) Each may last for a couple of months before I get bored of it and shift to another. I feel like I just get bored of whatever I have too easily and always want to change to something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 09:50 AM
4

Unless you set a rule like no sex until at least one year into the relationship, there would be a lot of short term monogamous relationships, like friends with benefits, to fill the gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:38 PM
7

You're completely right that girls are hit on often, but hardly any of these men qualify as the "Chad" that the OP mentioned. I'm thinking someone like her favourite musician or athlete, a once in a lifetime opportunity that she's almost certainly fantasised about at some point. Even in a happy, committed relationship, that would be tough to turn down. And if the relationship is lacking in some way, I think there's quite a high chance she'd go for it, especially with a low risk of getting caught…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 08:51 PM
2

As I mentioned, not every woman (or man). I don't doubt that you're being genuine in your response, but my experiences in life have told me that many people, both men and women, would readily cheat with the right person (with men on average having a much lower standard for what qualifies as good enough but many fewer opportunities to cheat) if there was little to no chance of getting caught. They might go about it in different ways, with men just looking for physical intimacy and women more freq…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 08:42 PM
4

She’s almost certainly not cheating when you’re around. But when you’re not around? Assuming it’s a situation with little to no risk of getting caught (e.g., business trip, distance relationship) I think a surprisingly high number of women would be at least tempted to try. Not all women of course, but I’d guess many of the guys who think they found someone who will be loyal to them for life are quite mistaken. We aren’t a truly monogamous species, no matter what we (both men and women) tell our …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 06:13 PM
4

In general, men place more of an emphasis on a woman’s beauty, which fades really quickly after 30 or so, whereas women place more emphasis on a man’s status/wealth/power, which can greatly increase later in life. This may be biologically driven, related to the childbirth thing you mentioned, but I’m sure there’s a social component as well. Biology reinforces society and society reinforces biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 04:30 PM
2

And women know their attractiveness is more time limited than men, as beauty plays a bigger role for women and this fades rapidly after a certain age. Therefore, there’s more of a rush to develop a strong emotional bond (cynics would say lock someone down) before losing her beauty.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 11:28 AM
–

Yes, just like most men don’t want fat women. Fame, money, power, humour, and getting fit can help a bit, but it’s really difficult to get over the height problem, especially if she’s taller than you. One thing that does seem to help is feel comfortable with being short. And if you’re not, fake it. Joke about yourself being short, like not having to worry about bumping your head on a low ceiling, that sort of thing. It shows confidence and may make her think, if he’s this short yet this confiden…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 04:04 PM
–

Even short women prefer taller men, just like even heavier guys prefer skinnier women. Only difference is short women can easily get taller guys. The equivalent is more go after fatter women who have much fewer options.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:58 PM
2

It’s also about women steeping their game up. If you don’t meet the female equivalent of most of these things yourself, demanding such requirements in a partner and blaming men for not meeting these requirements is acting entitled. And yeah, I’m aware this is likely a troll, but it’s Saturday morning and I have nothing better to do, so why not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:46 AM
4

Society favours high status men most, but disfavours low status men most. This makes it easy for progressives to complain about men in power, while conveniently ignoring high rates of violence, incarceration and dismissing psychological concerns of these men (just call them incels and losers).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 10:18 AM
2

Can’t contain herself how? If she’s throwing her body at random men, that’s a problem and you shouldn’t put up with that. But a little bit of teasing with nothing coming from it except some smiles and laughs is harmless. And let’s be honest, we men (assuming you’re a man, sorry if that’s wrong!) do it as well, as it’s just human nature, as I said. We just have to be honest with our partners about it about where our boundaries lie, and enforce them if necessary (but if you have open communication…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:14 PM
2

And I should add, there's a difference between this happening organically, like interacting with attractive people in your day to day life, versus going out of your way to meet these people (e.g., going to bars or nightclubs where you aim to flirt with such individuals). Also, these should be one-offs, no contact information exchanged, no coming back to the same store again and again at the time the attractive person was there to try to get another interaction, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:49 PM
0

Men will do it too. It's just human nature. That's why it's important for couples to have discussions on what is and isn't acceptable. Being a bit flirtatious with attractive people is almost impossible to avoid, but you should both be honest about it and be clear about where the line is drawn.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:44 PM
2

Depends on who the woman is. I'd certainly pick someone like my partner or mother over the tree, as part of the reason for being emotionally vulnerable is for someone else to understand you and still love you. But I'm definitely going for the tree over if it's just a random women. The risk / reward ratio simply isn't in my favour here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 05:00 PM
–

Career can be due to intelligence and hard work or simply inheriting daddy's multi-million dollar company. In the end though, it makes no difference. It's all about goal oriented behaviour, and whether a man can help a women meet her goals, which may be things like fame, financial security, travel, luxury fashion, etc., all things that a man with a good career (read: money and power) can help her to achieve. In short, if the man has a good career, he can open doors for a woman, regardless of how…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 04:19 PM
3

That's why I said subconsciously. While I don't think pheremones are the dominant factor, I think they have an effect, a nudge in a certain direction, but there has to be more to it than just pheremones alone. It's just not something that we are aware of, as it is subconscious, and thus we attribute the effects of pheremones to other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 08:05 PM
5

I think women can also feel the same, in the case that they are chasing a guy. It just doesn't happen as often, as men usually chase and women usually play a more passive role. Thus, it's not really a gender thing, but more a "wow, I worked so hard to get something and I finally got it" thing. And I mentioned hookers in the first post, but I probably should have mentioned a better example, long term relationships. In a relationship, once both of you have done everything together, there's no long…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:20 PM
1

Men are just much more lenient about who they sleep with, because the risks of sex for men are much less than for women. As far as relationships go, everyone settles, except for the top of the top who can have their first choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:12 PM
4

Pheremones most certainly exist, and they most certain can influence our sexual desires, even if they only play a secondary role in higher organisms like humans. Studies have shown men are subconsciously more attracted to women in their most ferile period, for example, something likely attributed to pheremones signalling that she is fertile.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:09 PM
13

Both men and women enjoy sex. Men might be hornier, less picky, and get off easier than women on the average, but if a woman is with a man who she loves and who makes an effort to please her (kissing, foreplay, etc.) she most certainly can love it. Also, a big difference is that, because men have to work for sex (generally), men also get a psychological ego boost from getting it, which is the same reason men don't feel elated when sleeping with a hooker.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:03 PM
3

I agree. The name feminism is holding gender equality back, as men do not want to be associated with it and a minority of loud vocal women have latched on to the fem label to turn it into a man hating philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:07 AM
2

Do you have a reference for the mother/father household thing? From what I've read, this is a modern invention. Prior to that, humans were much more communal, the way it still is in many societies today (look at Asian families) and our closest relatives, bonobos. As for cheating, unless you get caught in the act or someone rats you out, it's quite difficult to get caught, particularly before complex systems of language evolved. I'm not sure what the rates of cheating were back that, but I do kno…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:46 PM
1

It could work back then as well, particularly in cases where communities help raise children (for the single mother case) and for the cuckolding case, in the days before understanding genetics and paternity testing, unless it was so obvious (like two white people and the baby comes out black) most likely the father wouldn't want to risk killing his own offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 09:51 PM
2

I hate the terms alpha and beta, honestly, because humans aren't that easily categorised, but I used them because I thought it would be clearer than saying "the man she wants to have sex with" (alpha) and "the man she settles for as a provider because the alpha won't provide" (beta) In short, alphas are the men women crave, but because alphas have so many options, they either won't settle down at all or will only settle down with the absolute top women. Betas are men who women don't feel the sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 07:13 PM
2

Women actually have three strategies: 1) as you said, find a (beta) man, have a child with him, have him help you raise the child well, which can make up for his lower quality genetics 2) find an alpha man, sleep with him, and raise the child on your own (trading off the second parent for better genetics) 3) find a beta and an alpha, sleep with the beta but also secretly sleep with the alpha during your most fertile times, convince the beta the baby is his, benefit from both good genes and paren…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:48 PM
3

How do we enforce it without instituting a police state? And doesn’t this contradict freedom to live your life as you want it by forcing marriages? Also, many forced marriages are likely to be unhappy ones, perhaps a fate worse than just being single. I’m completely with the idea of rewarding monagamy, as stable families and children are a net benefit for society. But forcing it? That’s ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:50 PM
3

Yep, one crucial feature would have to be a balance of men and women, so there would have to be some sort of waiting list or approval process in play to keep things balanced. Another would have to be limits on who you can match with, so once "Chad" or "Tyrone" (your words, not mine) have a few messages, they would be off limits to contact by others for some time, meaning that women would have to choose a different guy to contact. These limitations would also apply to men so that they couldn't fl…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 11:06 AM
1

I'm not an engineer, just someone who wants to make the world a better place. If I ever moved forward on this idea, I'd basically have to pay a team of developers to build the whole thing, so it's likely just another one of my crazy ideas that I can't afford to execute haha. I'm more approaching it from a business perspective, how to align what men and women want with a business model that generates sufficient profits for the company. All just brainstorming at this point, but I'd definitely be w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 10:52 AM
6

Maybe it’s just me, but I most certainly hit on “bad” girls who I didn’t consider relationship material in suggestive ways that I would never do early on with girls I wanted something long term with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 07:57 PM
7

Isn’t Trump’s audience largely evangelical women at this point?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:17 PM
6

In general, online dating does not want you to find your lover, as then you'll stop using/paying for the service. They need to balance this by giving you some hope (some messages and dates) to prevent you from stopping using it, but they also don't want you to meet the perfect person too fast, as that is lost income. That's also why these apps skew towards people looking for hookups (whether they are up front about it or not), because after the hookup is done, the people involved will come back …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:03 PM
36

Men also treat women differently depending on their type If he's attracted to her and sees her as a potential partner (sex or dating), he will be much more likely to treat her (give her gifts, pay the bill when going out, etc.) versus someone he is not attracted to, where he will just treat her as a friend (e.g., split the bill) If he sees her as a short term fling, he will escalate for sex versus if he sees her as a long term relationship where he will play things slowly And on and on. That's j…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 02:42 PM
–

I feel like blue pill pushes the passive "just be a good person, you will find someone" narrative, whereas red pill pushes a more active "try to be the person women want and take the initiative to get them" narrative. Which one works better for you will depend on your looks, personality, career, etc., and what kind of women you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 06:43 PM
6

So wouldn’t you want a society where it’s easier for people to lose weight? Where they are supported and encouraged both economically (subsidised healthy choices) and socially (not shamed, as this has been shown to not be effective, but supported on their weight loss journeys)?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:47 PM
5

Correlation does not equal causation. Genetics and diet play a huge role here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:44 PM
1

Subsidize healthy life choices (things related to exercise, healthy foods) and tax risky or unhealthy choices. Reward anyone no matter their health for making healthy choices, and penalise anyone regardless of health for risky or unhealthy behaviours. This encourages everyone to live healthier, safer, more fulfilling lives. Although being thin is correlated with being healthy, it doesn’t not necessarily mean you are healthy, and vice versa for being fat. Also, that would be impossible to enforce…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:43 PM
23

Fat shaming doesn’t work. But I completely agree that governments should subside healthy things like gym memberships to incentivise everyone to be as healthy as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:44 PM
14

Trash that's basically a marketing ploy for whatever stupid PUA shit he's pushing this week. But for a more serious answer, I suppose a really rich, high status man could get away with this kind of thing, with the wife tolerating it to continue accessing his money and the perks of being married to a powerful man. But none of these Youtube pickup con-artists are anywhere near that level. And also, it's an extremely unhealthy relationship, even if both tolerate and accept it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:04 AM
1

Wow, I totally misunderstood that comment. I get where you are coming from. But I suppose a forced marriage would still be pretty lonely if either or both partners are unhappy. Being together does not mean not being lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 08:58 PM
3

Yeah, but I don't think a few minutes is good enough to do any "deep" idea justice. On the few occasions I go to Tiktok it's because I just want to watch some people doing stupid shit, like people fighting at McDonald's, to take my mind off things. I'd never go there for any sort of intellectual purpose, as it's simply not what the platform is for. Maybe at a superficial level it suffices though, kinda like how a Wikipedia article can give you a brief introduction to a topic or idea. If I want s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 07:43 PM
1

Unfortunately there are a lot of men who would rather play video games than do irl things with friends. The same way an alcoholic would rather drink than see friends, a gambling addict would rather sit at a slot machine than see friends, and a porn addict would rather wank one out all day long than see friends. Addiction is powerful. Video game addiction is real, and it's much more prevalent than gets reported.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:20 PM
2

What does female employment have anything to do with it? If the men are working, what difference does it make whether the women is working too? (assuming both have standard 9-5 jobs).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:18 PM
5

Tiktok videos are too short for anything deep. It's just not the right format.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:14 PM
3

What makes you happy now may not be best for your future. Adults are typically aware of long-term consequences of actions, even if they still ifnore them due to short-term temptations. Kids, on the other hand, are much less likely to understand this and if not forced to by parents and teachers, less likely to do things they don't like now for the long-term benefits. If we just allowed kids to do whatever they want, they'd eat sweets for dinner, drop out of school, play games all day long. If you…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:11 PM
1

I feel the opposite, that most video games these days are designed more and more for the mobile crowd. Save anywhere, causal modes where death is meaningless, hand holding rather than letting you figure things out on your own, very little challenge, linear gameplay with very little thinking involved. I don't play video games often anymore, now that I'm older, but when I do, I want a challenge and I want to be immersed. Maybe I'm just old school, but mobile gaming rarely interests me, and I espec…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 04:34 PM
10

For a man to be a virgin because he has no options is seen as shameful, or worse. For a man to be a virgin despite having options is not. Some people may be confused by his behaviour, some may question his sexuality, but others might think he's really a catch, a good man who isn't a manwhore and has standards. It's about whether you are desired by women (in particular, "good" women), not whether you've had sex. Anyone can get a hooker and have sex. But not anyone can be desired, craved, dreamed …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 02:19 PM
1

Yeah, you're right. I was just thinking weird as in not fitting in, like the stereotypical loud, blue haired, overweight, unfashionable feminist woman. But, as weird as she may be, I don't think she's a creep. On the other hand, the men who pretend to advocate women's rights or issues because they think that's how they will find a girlfriend or get laid, that's really pathetic and creepy (and ineffective, but that's not the point). And it's particularly awful when it's the "anti-man" type of fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 10:51 AM
-5

Sorry, I was more thinking divorce than death of a partner. I completely agree that having a partner die is extremely traumatic, far more so than losing a job in most cases. I was more considering that you mentioned "I'd rather not depend on anyone", but that you failed to recognise that work also means depending on someone else (an employer). Even going the self-employed route means working with others, and thus to a certain extent depending on them. It's just an inevitable part of being human …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 01:28 PM
5

First time experience, especially when it's both of us experiencing it for the first time, is golden. It's so great to both figure something new out together and bond over it (not just sex, but any activity). However, I also love when it's her first time and not mine (feels great to teach her) and vice-versa (feels great to learn from her). But nothing beats trying something new together!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 01:13 PM
-20

But you could say the same about work. In work you rely on an employer, the same way in marriage you could say to be relying on a husband if you don't work. You could get laid off at any time, or you could develop a health condition or get injured such that you can no longer do your job. Depending on whether you live, there may be state benefits to help out in this case, but you could say the same about a bad divorce (and you may get alimony as well). Nothing in life is certain. If you live your…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 01:06 PM
1

How about the narcissistic billionaires and corporations pay for it? :)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 09:40 AM
2

Because most feminists are also pro-Islam for some odd reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 09:30 AM
3

There are a lot of bad things going on now in the UK, mostly driven by our conservative government and voters (e.g., Brexit, anti-immigation policies, high cost of living relative to salaries, government scandals like partygate that show our leaders think they are above the law), but I'd much rather live here than in the USA. At least the UK is much safer (no guns or mass shootings), the NHS has its problems but it's still miles ahead of the privatised mess that healthcare is in the states, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 09:27 AM
10

Most vocal feminists of either gender are weirdos. In fact, you could probably generalise that to "most vocal supporters of any social/political cause are weirdos".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 09:13 AM
2

So how exactly do you suggest we use the stick in a way that doesn’t violate the freedom and dignity of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 08:53 AM
23

But it seems a lot of guys want to skip over the practice process, find a woman who is also a virgin, and hope she will be the one and only for him, without any practice beforehand. If they are both the only ones they have had, they will both be the best they've ever had. I somewhat joke, but there is some truth to the fact that if people had less access to sex partners and porn, they would be more satisfied with what they have in their partner, as they don't have anything to compare it to. Igno…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 12:31 AM
2

Then perhaps we need a bigger carrot? Or a different flavoured carrot that is desired by the public. We need to conduct research to better understand why people aren't getting married and having kids, and then create policies to shift society in such a way that encourages people to get married and have kids (up to replacement rate), as both of these are healthy for society overall. The solution is never to force people into marriage or having kids. This will never end well, especially for the ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 12:26 AM
8

The cost of living in most Asian countries is ridiculously low compared to most Western countries. The issue there is workers have very little power and therefore are forced to work long hours in poor conditions and are paid almost nothing for their work. And also, social welfare systems are generally lacking in Asian countries, as this is seen as more of a family responsibility and thus out of scope for the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 06:20 PM
12

Not necessarily. There has to be a balance between personal freedom and the greater good (value for society and the environment), as individual freedom depends on a healthy society and environment. That's why you can't just kill someone you don't like or dump your waste in the ocean, at least not legally. In these cases, laws were passed to increase the cost of individual behaviours that are harmful on a wider societal scale, taking away some personal freedom to allow for a healthy society and e…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 06:15 PM
1

The term "feminism" has become an umbrella concept with a variety of different definitions all using the same term. There are a mix of different strands under the umbrella of feminism, ranging from those with egalitarian goals to those that are actively anti-male, and everything in between. There are also a bunch of differing opinions within the feminist ideology on topics such as sex (e.g., sex positive feminism versus sex negative feminism).
/r/TheRedPill08/12/23 04:59 PM
1

Let me clarify further. Prostitution is a thing because women feel the money gained from it cancels out the harms that come from sleeping with random men (and risks of violence, reputational harm, STIs, etc.). That's irrelevant though, as no one is forcing women to be prostitutes, except for the case of people being trafficked. Excluding that and cases of rape, women still have the final choice whether to engage in sexual activities most of the time, which is a privilege. If a man wants a child,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 02:04 PM
5

I mean, women generally have the final say on whether to engage in sexual activities, as it is typically men pursuing women and women choosing which man to sleep with. Yes, it takes two, but in general it is much easier for women to get sex than men. Regarding childbirth, I mean that women have the choice on whether to try to get pregnant, whether to keep a child if they get pregnant, and the confirmation that the baby is theirs, unlike fathers who may never know if they are the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 12:58 PM
2

I think a lot of experience for either gender is somewhat of a bad thing for building relationships, as sex no longer feels like something special that showcases your love for your partner, but rather just another fun thing to do. The more things you've tried, the fewer new things you can try together, making it harder to bond over having something special just between the two of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 12:52 PM
1

In general, control over relationships, sex, and childbirth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 12:27 PM
4

The undesirable guy gets to experience a relationship, reducing his likelihood of becoming bitter towards women in the future, so the woman can also feel like she did a good deed and it's a win-win for society. I doubt it. He will just whine about, "she left me for some asshole" or "she used me, women are all manipulative whores", blah blah blah.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 12:26 PM
–

This is the classic "self vs. group" paradox, where self interests conflict with the interests of the group you are a part of. And typically it doesn't end well for the group interests, which get pushed aside to benefit the self. Applies to all groups and genders. There's nothing exclusive to feminism here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 12:04 AM
–

But none of these issues are really issues anymore in the West. I think that's why feminists often latch onto "woke" stuff, because there's really nothing else left to fight for at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 12:00 AM
1

There's some truth in many red pill concepts, and even black pill ones. That's why they sell and convince people to believe them. However, there's also truth in the some of what the blue pill side argues. Most people just refuse to be open minded enough to even listen to what the other side is saying. It's basically politics at this point, with people cheering on their team as true believers. This place, even with its occassional incel-ish posts, is one of the few places where there's at least s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 11:50 PM
1

As a man, for me to sleep with you (a woman), you have to something more than porn and my hands can offer. This means either: a) I know or believe you are really really good at sex (either from past experience or from what I've heard from friends, or sometimes you can just guess) b) You offer some kind of wild, crazy, or risky sex that catches my interest and indulges a fantasy of mine c) you're drop dead gorgeous, dressed or behaving in a way that makes me crave you, or we just hit it off in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 08:36 PM
–

My girlfriend isn't perfect. She wasn't perfect for me when we first met. But because we've spent so much time together and grown and changed together, we are now perfect for each other. Could things change in the future? Of course, although I think it's pretty unlikely, as both of us are pretty open with each other and mature enough to talk through tough problems. But I am aware that things could change, and I'm not attached to the idea of soulmates or anything of that nature. I still have cert…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 03:27 PM
–

Yes, this is true. But what you're not factoring in is all the bonding that's occurred between you and your partner over the years you've been together. All the little inside jokes, and the memories, knowing each other inside and out, appreciating each other's quirks. I frequently meet women who are "better" than my girlfriend in a variety of ways, but once all the connections me and my girl have built up and the risks of things possibly not being compatible long term are factored in, it's just …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 12:29 PM
0

Yes, but it's hard for 50 years of culture to override a couple hundred million years of biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 12:37 AM
3

If you genuinely were open to getting with him but over the course of interaction you no longer felt it, the least you could do is return the favour and buy him a drink before you pull the fake "I have a bf" card.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 01:35 PM
3

Giving him cookies once won't do it. But some grandparents go way beyond this, always giving the kid everything he wants. The kid learns to just cry and scream when he wants something, and he will get it. He never learns how to live without getting what he wants, and then acts like an entitled spoiled brat in the "real world" when he grows up. As for the second one, of course it's not their main goal to do so, but their views will come out in the process of raising the kid. They might say things…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 01:31 PM
7

And grandparents instill bad behaviors in children, like spoiling them, and in general have an outdated way of viewing the world (racist, sexist, etc)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 12:46 PM
17

For women, it's using sex to get power/money/things. For men, it's using power/money/things to get sex. Of course, there's an element of this in any relationship, but it is pretty clear when this is the dominant behaviour. And to have people be afraid to call it out because of fear of "slut shaming", when they damn well would call out men for for their behaviour is just hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 09:29 PM
1

Abnormal doesn’t mean antisocial. Antisocial means something harmful to society or avoiding spending time with people. Unless he’s harassing women in his approaches, I wouldn’t call it antisocial(and no, complimenting a women or asking her out isn’t harassment)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 12:37 AM
3

Desperation perhaps, but I wouldn't say antisocial.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 06:03 PM
13

They are pushing an agenda. Fewer people engage in hookup culture than movies and social media would have you believe. And this applies to both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 04:21 PM
1

Why are you taking photos? Selfies are the worst. Choose some photos of you out and about doing interesting things (your mates and dates shouldn't be in the picture though!) It will imply that you're interesting and good company without having to type it in a bio that no one reads.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 10:18 PM
8

The higher you make the legal age of something, the more it will be done underground if there is demand for it. There is demand for drinking and porn, and changing the laws to raise these ages will not stop this demand. It will only make it more difficult to control and do safely. Production may move overseas where there is less stringent age verification and less safety in the industry. And as for 21 as a drinking age, that's just the USA, at least in the Western world. Having a drinking age of…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 01:11 AM
5

I think it's less about "out of marriage" and more about "does the child have two loving parents to raise him/her properly"? And there are a lot of ways this can be a no - could be children born out of wedlock, could be divorce and single parent custody, could be one parent is absent (in prison, missing, never around, or deceased), could be one or both parents are abusive, deadbeats, druggies, or other otherwise incapable of providing the child with a proper upbringing. With the exception of rar…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 07:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter