TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mike918 Archive

View 2 posts and 52 comments by mike918 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Let's not forget to have a kid so I can pay you child support for a brat I never see.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 04:26 AM
1

Thanks /u/Sepean! I didn't realize how miserable /u/thisapplethisapple made me either!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 04:12 AM
3

The default question for me is whether the act/decision/consequence affects me. Ah yes, the old Golden Rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 05:19 PM
-1

I would argue that men evolved to use logic more often because you can't be having the feels when a group of you are trying to hunt deer or some other prey. Lions hunt. When did they evolve logic again?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 09:06 AM
0

I meant that you are disagreeing with him also, as you well know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 07:50 AM
0

He said that Red Pillers do not believe women are more intelligent than men. You are saying that women are more intelligent, on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 06:23 AM
0

Interesting. Your pal /u/Atlas_B_Shruggin seems to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 05:35 AM
-2

Do you have a source?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 05:32 AM
1

Kill- I dunno. This new mike guy seems like someone whose sacrifice would appease the Gods. I want to masturbate while watching you have consensual sex with your father.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 04:39 AM
0

If you're a Republican and you support policies that incarcerate black men at wildly disproportionate rates, then it doesn't matter how nice you are to black people in your personal life, you're still supporting racist policies, which makes you a racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 07:08 PM
-1

Are you seriously trying to tell me that people don't use other people? See how I predicted and refuted this argument in advance: This does not mean they can't give pleasure to others, which is probably the idiotic counterargument you're typing right now. It means that there has to be stuff like consent, reciprocity, a recognition of subjectivity, etc.) (Predicting and refuting arguments in advance is called prolepsis in case you were wondering.)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 06:51 PM
4

It's implied by almost everything Red Pillers say. That's why I had that whole explicit or implicit bit in bold.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 06:48 PM
-3

It's a precondition for discourse. It's not found anywhere. Either you buy into it and communication can commence or you don't and Red Pill and Blue Pill are two angry ships yelling in the night. (Although Red Pill is yelling hate speech, and Blue Pill is yelling intelligent thought, so they're not totally the same.)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 06:47 PM
1

Did you see the part of my post where I succinctly explained complex ethical thought to our misguided friend while also refuting his arguments? No? Let me copy and paste that here for you: Women are not cars; they are people. It is acceptable to use cars as objects because cars do not have autonomy. In philosophical parlance, it is the difference between a subject and an object. (Pretending like the only option other than object is concept is a waste of my time, but probably not yours, since you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 06:06 PM
-2

What did I tell you mods? Their (Anti-RP's) objections to the debate is the fact that we're allowed to talk, not any harassment....real or perceived. No. If you could read, you would realize that I'm not against you talking. (I mean, I am, but that's outside the scope of this thread.) I'm suggesting that Red Pill meet the simple burden of maintaining speech that does not explicitly or implicitly suggest that women are not human.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:53 PM
4

True story.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 04:39 PM
3

I think you missed the boat there, sailor. I'm not asking questions to learn for myself. I've already read Red Pill "philosophy" on virginity. I'm asking questions that reframe those concepts in order to provoke thought, which is a concept you should think about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 03:55 PM
15

I'm guessing the /u/cherryblue12 was implying less that arranged marriage to a virgin is gross and more that you're gross. "Who, me?" you ask, and sniff both pits. "Yes, you." "But why?" (1) Women are not cars. They cannot be used or unused. That you think they can be used or unused makes you gross. (2) Women are not objects. That you treat them like objects is gross. (3) Why the fuck does it matter whether or not a woman is a virgin? (4) Why does virginity imply innocence? Virgins can sodomize …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 03:42 PM
2

The person who consented to its birth. If you're saying consenting to sex is consent to parenthood, great, lets shut down abortion clinics, and safe haven infant abandonment shelters. Okay, that's a valid argument. I don't know that I agree with it, but it's not totally crazy. Even if I did agree with you, it wouldn't mean that women are privileged over and against men in society though. Read up on Primary Aggressor laws and Duluth model's description of violence as "patriarchal" and one-sided. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 06:31 PM
1

Knock yourself out. You really shouldn't act like an expert on feminism if you don't know what the Duluth Model is. That Wikipedia page says nothing about incarcerating men for being victims of domestic abuse, probably because that's not a thing that actually exists in the world. Just like there isn't a Wikipedia page about the fourth female president of the United States because she doesn't exist. Its bad that men and women don't have equal rights post conception. Its fucking terrible that men …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 06:10 PM
5

Here. Here is a random source that I found after two seconds of Googling that you will not read that features a feminist author arguing about the importance of recognizing male victims of domestic abuse. Are you happy now? And about not making decisions are you saying women were privileged when they weren't allowed to vote? It turns out that I was not saying that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 06:05 PM
1

The relationship between and a man and a woman loosely follows the same models. Maybe you and your SO are special and have a completely equal, honest, egalitarian and equitable relationship. Good for you. Honestly. Most people do not. And I'm saying that if you approach personal relationships using those models, then you are going to create a self-fulfilling prophecy. If, instead, you approach relationships with non-hierarchical models based on mutual respect instead of authority, consensus-buil…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 04:55 PM
4

No it isn't. Couples can communicate and discuss, but ultimately there can only be one decision maker. There is one opinion that simply 'matters' more, and they ultimately make the decision. Oh man, you're so right. I totally forgot how at the end of all of our reasonable discussions in which we both give honest input and weigh the pros and cons and discuss what's important to each other and why, she just goes off and says, "You'll never see this vag again, Beta-bitch. Muwhahahahahahahaha, I'm g…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 04:23 PM
4

Failure to understand power dynamics likely means you have none Yes, dudeeeeeee, that's what I'm sayin'. If you observe any rules/laws you are acknowledging a power hierarchy. What rules and laws do you imagine I have in my relationship? I mean, we've agreed to be exclusive, so I guess that could be construed as a rule? It could also be construed as a commitment that applies to both of us equally and that we have both agreed to happily...? Perspective, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 04:19 PM
1

Source? All I see in AMR and Shitredditsays is outrage when a man defends himself against a persistent, vicious female assailant. What is up with you people and sources? Sources are used to prove empirical claims. If I said, "Whales can sing so loud that they can be heard up to 200 miles away," it would make sense for you to want a source. If I said, "Whales should not be hunted to extinction," I would not need a source, because that is a normative claim. It describes just or right action. You m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 04:08 PM
6

One party will always be more powerful in relationship to the other. What? Why is this true? How do you even say this without the ferry to Exception Island blaring its foghorn in your head? First of all, how do you define power in a relationship? Because if it's in terms of strength, yeah, the man is probably stronger. But what if it's in terms of money? Or the quality of parenting? Second of all, WHY DO YOU FEEL THE NEED TO CONCEIVE OF RELATIONSHIPS IN TERMS OF POWER IN THE FIRST PLACE?! Have y…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 03:29 PM
11

There's a lot of dissensus on this issue, starting from the most basic methodological questions--what is "sex drive"? how do you measure it?--all the way up to interpreting the results of various studies and their applicability to sweeping, generalized claims. I did ten seconds of searching and I found this link (pdf): http://www.sexscience.org/PDFs/Gender%20Differences%20and%20Similarities%20in%20Sexuality%20Final.pdf I don't know much about the organization that sponsored the link, the Society…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 11:40 PM
6

I don't think you get it. Blue Pill doesn't claim those things will get you laid. Blue Pill doesn't want you to get laid. If you never got laid again, we would throw a goddamn parade. It would be a celebration. We would toast to your genetic extinction with Sutter Home wine. Blue Pill is about how Red Pill makes you an awful human being. If you can't get laid without a sexual manipulation manual, that's your problem. Also, doing chores and whispering sweet nothings and shit are not some kind of …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 11:19 PM
3

Worth considering. You can argue whether this test is valid or not, but the T/F split isn't meant to represent rational/irrational. I'm an INTJ with an "NF" fiancée, and one of the reasons I love and respect her is that she's very smart and rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 09:08 PM
3

INTJ. Quick count shows 10 other INTJs have responded to this post. Maybe we shouldn't be so quick to assume anyone here could have a grasp on what "most people" are like.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 09:02 PM
0

I guess part of the answer to your dilemma is that TRP doesn't think that being moral or good will get you respected or acknowledged by other people in society. That's insane. (1) Being moral and good > being respected by other people in society. (2) Nobody respects immoral or bad people. That's why we call them (a) immoral or (b) bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 07:29 PM
3

Can you provide a source for these? What? No, I'm not going to provide a source that says we shouldn't hit each other or that we should judge women based on their characters rather than how attractive they are. That's an idiotic waste of time. None of my points require sources. They're normative stances. You either think we shouldn't hit each other or you don't. You either think women are skin sacks that should be valued based on how high they score on the fuckable scale or you don't. What kind …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 07:23 PM
0

I'm pretty sure your post is an example of what people mean when they say something is homophobic!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 11:40 PM
0

But it's sooooooooooooooo good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 11:36 PM
0

The link is not actually me playing ukulele. It's the broccoli in my post's food pyramid. The jokes were the dessert.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 11:19 PM
0

That's true, I did do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 11:15 PM
0

First, I wake up in the mornings and make the burlap sack bed I stole from a hardworking farmer with twelve children. Then I drink an organic soy fair trade latte. When I'm not panhandling outside of multinational banks, I like to play my ukulele. Here's a video of me playing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 11:14 PM
3

To create and maintain interest from the opposite sex... So, like, to fuck bitches, amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 07:48 PM
4

Dude, like, what are your goals here? Do you ever stop to think about the bigger picture? It sounds like what you're saying is that if the Red Pill works on horrible, self-involved, greedy whore-monsters, then "Sweet, I know whom I'm sleeping with tonight!" And if the Red Pill doesn't work on complex, reasonable human beings, then you just keep going down the stools (so conveniently lined up at the bar!) until you find a whore-monster you can trick into fucking you. Is that right? Please, God, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 03:59 PM
1

I'm still not going to watch the video, but the Frankfurt School did immigrate to the United States as a result of Hitler's rise, so it's probably a good video, even if you linked to it. Also, I like the Frankfurt School. Also also, I like communist values.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 04:36 AM
11

Let’s go through these one-by-one because I’m just drunk enough to jump into the path of this imminent trainwreck. From an early age the opposite sex will be instructed never to hit me but I may not be given the same instructions. However, should I strike males I can expect not to be hit back and any social penalties that occur from my actions will actually fall on the male. You’re right, that’s bad. Feminists argue that we should all be instructed from birth not to hit each other, regardless of…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 03:09 AM
1

My results. Economic Left/Right: -6.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.03 Edit: And, to clarify, I'm Blue Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 05:08 AM
0

Getting in the way if crass self interest? I'm actually asking, not just trying to be clever. Whenever I meet someone who seems to genuinely believe only what they want matters, I get sort of weirdly fascinated by their psychology in a sort of disturbed way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 12:53 PM
-1

Basically. So I just go with the one that gets my dick sucked the most. There it is. It's a calculus, right? There are plausible accounts that (a) only the self exists, (b) the self does not exist, and (c) both the self and others exist and that the self has duties and obligations towards others. If (a), nothing you do matters. Sure you can maximize pleasure and minimize pain, but there's no outside objective reality to determine the rightness or wrongness of those actions. So even if you spend …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 04:48 PM
-1

Why do I have the feeling that your undergraduate honors thesis came to the conclusion that if the only certainty is self-existence, then the self-exister should maximize his own pleasure and happiness? I think it's gross when arguments for self-interest masquerade as arguments for skepticism. From a premise of skepticism, almost any conclusion is possible. I could just as easily argue that even though I'm only certain that I exist, the possibility that others exist requires me to behave towards…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 03:58 PM
-1

That's what I thought, but just to be absolutely clear, I want to define your answer a little more thoroughly. You are saying that the 80/20 rule comes from a group of self-selected individuals posting in an online forum. First, let's cover why that guesstimate is likely to be inaccurate. (1) Selection Bias. Because Red Pillers already ascribe to Red Pill theory, they are predisposed to support its conclusions. (2) Reporting Bias. Red Pillers are more likely to overreport results that confirm th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 03:25 AM
-1

Regardless of whether or not you are cherrypicking, I'd like to jump in and ask you to take a step back and answer some of my questions about the bigger picture, because it is probably more important that you stop believing Red Pill theory than that you stop cherrypicking the definition of cherrypicking. Red Pill claims that 80% of women have sex with 20% of men. Where do these data come from? The only evidence I have seen cited by Red Pillers is the OK Cupid study, but since the OK Cupid study …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 02:58 AM
2

That doesn't seem like much of an answer coming from a Red Piller. The Red Pill is supposed to be about taking control of your life! I have certainly felt caught in the crossfire too. In the usual Western nations (e.g., America, Australia, Canada, England, Germany), women are beginning to catch up or overtake men on a number of significant metrics, including education and employment. As a whole, societies are, for the first time in Western European history, beginning to question whether or not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 03:29 PM
2

You may have posted this before I edited my comment, but I think it's worth repeating, even if this double standard is true, why would I look to the Red Pill, which sets up another double standard in place of this one? If my goal is the removal of double standards, just creating my own in response to the first is counterproductive. It's like--and here's the kicker--it's like the Red Pill is using perceptions of inequality to justify its own inequality because its members know that they will bene…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 03:01 PM
2

I'm not sure what you mean. What are these double standards? (I'll bet our definitions of double standards differs.) Why should these double standards justify judging women on a different set of value systems. If, as you claim, feminism judges men based on a double standard, then, as a person interested in fairness, you have two options: (1) work to eliminate the double standard or (2) generate your own set of double standards right back. (1) is the reasonable approach that seeks fairness and eq…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 02:52 PM
2

She wants judgements on her achievements, personality, preferences and choices to be made based on her own paradigm of views. Based on her own set of values and beliefs, far far more specific than the bullshit she makes up about TRP believing women are lesser. I think you're right to the extent that I think she does want to be judged against her own value system. I know that I want to be judged against my own value system. For example, I consider myself pretty intelligent, and I try to use my in…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 01:53 AM
2

I reject your patently ridiculous demands. You do not dictate how you will be viewed. Oh buddy, that logic cuts both ways. If you get to decide how to view someone based on whatever random criteria you chose, then they get to view you based on whatever random criteria they chose. For example, your username is nonsensical and uses capitalization rules incorrectly. Therefore, I view you as illiterate. Does it matter that your post demonstrates your literacy? No it does not, because my criteria onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 09:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter