TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

milk_tea_with_boba Archive

View 0 posts and 68 comments by milk_tea_with_boba on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Femicide doesn't require a killer to suddenly hate all women. The question is whether gendered beliefs, expectations, or power dynamics contributed to why this victim was targeted. A man killing his wife because she tried to leave him isn't necessarily expressing hatred of all women, but he may still be acting on beliefs about control and entitlement that are gendered. After all, it’s a much rarer phenomenon to see women kill their husbands. Men are murdered more, but women die specifically due …
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:54 AM
1

So it’s only about pooping in the specific context of men who live with girlfriends or wives that dislike when they poop too long? I think that’s where it lost me cuz like…I don’t think I’ve ever thought abt how long anybody else is pooping? Or vise versa.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 08:39 PM
1

What the other commenters are saying about Shauna intentionally being portrayed as a bad person is true, but ALSO her characterization in the pilot is a bit different from the rest of the show. The pilot was filmed before COVID, & the rest of season one was filmed post-COVID once they could film again. Some plot points get lost, for example Shauna being weird towards Callie’s bf never comes up again in the show’s 3 seasons. Also, Melanie Lynsky (Shauna’s actress) has commented on this scene and …
/r/MensRights04/04/26 11:40 PM
3

Good thing Bakedpotato486 does not authenticate mental health professionals. That’s what years of schooling and PHDs and certifications and licensures and review boards backed by empirical scientific research are for.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 06:01 PM
5

You clearly know nothing about what trans people actually experience if you think it avoids mental health professionals. Consulting a mental health professional is usually the first step in getting hormone replacement therapy and in some places it’s literally required to get diagnosed with a mental illness (gender dysphoria) to get treatment. So, yes, transgender people have a mental illness. But the way to treat that mental illness is the thing you’re against because living in your “body as it …
/r/MensRights30/10/25 02:06 AM
6

This might be true on Reddit.com but sure as hell ain’t true in real life. People shit on trans people constantly. Hell the democratically elected United States president shits on trans people. People loveee shitting on trans people, which is especially disproportionate since they’re 1% of the population.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 06:01 AM
-1

Sometimes but not always. Google femme 4 femme lesbians. Not all relationships are boyish person and girlish person
/r/MensRights02/08/24 10:10 PM
-2

Acting masculine isn’t the same as acting like a man. Guys can act feminine and still be 100% dudes. Girls can act masculine and still be 100% chicks. It’s not a caricature it’s a preference for self expression
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:19 PM
1

I really empathize with Men’s Rights folks and agree with comments on this post until y’all say some dumb shit like this
/r/MensRights02/08/24 05:24 PM
0

nobody loves downvotes that’s the whole premise of them EDIT: jk I’m loving them please keep going
/r/MensRights28/04/23 08:34 AM
3

Are these restrooms with stalls?? Since there’s two of them and it’s just a Starbucks I assumed they were individual rooms. So no communal pissing happening, I don’t think
/r/MensRights28/04/23 08:33 AM
2

haha that’s so creative 😂 how’d you think of that one man
/r/MensRights28/04/23 08:30 AM
0

Out of those two options in that first sentence, I sure hope you aren’t suggesting your girlfriend is “.5 point” below you 👀 I don’t think that mindset would bode well with your gf ahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:48 PM
1

I’m also not interested in touching this. You can choose to not use somebody’s pronouns, of course. You’re entitled to call anyone whatever you want. It’s incorrect, however, to say “s/he” is the respectful option here. You’re clearly aware this poster feels most comfortable using he & him because of his mental illness, but actively ignore this. How can that be called respectful? That is all. I hope you have a nice day as well.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:54 AM
1

Well, yeah. Yes, I agree. Of course it’s ignorant of the guy to only acknowledge inequality once it applies to him. But, his treatment is men’s treatment. I’m just saying, as you are, that he’s making the post in bitter acknowledgment of the things that now apply to him. Which is just to say that he’s not distancing himself from being a guy. That’s all I’m saying. He’s a dude. Or at the very least, he identifies as such, uses he/him pronouns, and is as ingrained into manhood as he can be as some…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:49 AM
1

Yeah, I’m just clarifying the actual respectful option.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:02 PM
-3

That’s not how I interpret this at all. He actively hates the way men are perceived and neglected in society, yeah, but so do all men here. I think his post shows a (mostly) accurate perspective on men’s experience, which he has gained through living life as such. I don’t think he’s distancing himself from being a guy. In fact I’d go as far as to say he’s transitioned to being man, and is accepting the burdens he realizes come with that. Scathingly, but, gender transition is often a necessary so…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:12 PM
-12

s/he’s He. He’s a dude. That’s the entire premise of this.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 01:42 PM
29

Okay, then they’re circumcised before they are able to give consent to such medical procedures. Better? Different semantics, same problem
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:58 AM
-1

Source?
/r/MensRights04/07/22 08:12 AM
4

I’m curious as to why you think this being a state’s issue is preferable to it being a federal one. Women seeking abortions will always exist in every state, in prominent enough numbers that I think they shouldn’t be a silenced minority. After all, it’s their lives and bodies at jeopardy. The south also alleged the US Civil War to be a matter of “state’s rights,” and that too was all just a thinly veiled way for conservatives to enforce their beliefs onto others’ lives
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:19 PM
2

Well then, at the very least, the definition isn’t of childhood (as well as personhood) is subjective. Not just from person to person, but from body of legislation to body of legislation. A child is whatever law says it is and so there’s precedent to support either point of view.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:10 PM
-1

right, “state’s rights”. I seem to recall a few other occasions of regressive pushback on the premise of “states’ rights,” ha.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:54 PM
3

And what do you think that’s effectively going to do in conservative southern states? Not constitutionally protecting abortion is going to tangibly make it more inaccessible
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:44 PM
-8

They aren’t children though. That’s the entire reason abortions are a thing that happen at all. Nobody would kill what they call a child. It’s all just a matter of differences in opinion on the benchmarks of what is considered sentient. If you believe something lacks sentience enough for it’s termination to be ethical, it’s not a child.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:26 PM
2

Women can “just want sex”, just like men often do. Women can also, however, seek committed life partnerships with their sex: relationships. (And men can feel the same, of course)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 02:51 AM
1

Desire for a romantic life partner is practically default human conditioning. It’s a goal for the vast majority of people to find somebody who fulfills them sexually, but also as a companion, to live and love and go through life with. Of course, this doesn’t apply to everyone! There are plenty of people who desire non-traditional relationships or don’t even experience romantic attraction. Might want to look into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 02:26 AM
-12

By goods you mean money, right? Money that’s surely only received by the driver after the transaction’s completed? When the money is given to Uber, it isn’t received by the driver if they reject it. A guy would provide money to Uber, the company, and definitely still receive his service he is entitled to, just from a different driver. Presumably wouldn’t even be aware of everything that’d happened. There are exceptions about the denying of services, and I feel like autonomy about deciding who to…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 06:48 AM
-8

Well, sure, it’d be like saying that, if it was an entirely different situation. Segregation in public transport actively worked to make the lives of black people worse. Besides, of course public spaces shouldn’t have discriminatory qualifications. But this isn’t public. Nobody is entitled to get a ride in somebody’s car, which is what Uber is.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 06:01 AM
-30

Does this really affect men negatively though? I mean, they’ll just get a different driver, right? Personally, I wouldn’t want to ride in the vehicle of a driver who feels uncomfortable with me being there anyway.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:50 AM
58

Right, it’s strange to even act as though he’d have even considered dating “this bitch”
/r/MensRights11/03/22 08:03 AM
1

Title is correct but also incredibly obvious. Hell, it’s pretty well known guys can be misogynistic after having bad experiences with women, why wouldn’t it go the other way around? Incels, femcels, bitter people of all kinds- it’s all the same type of gross. …clearly you haven’t been on FemaleDatingStrategy, have you?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 01:28 AM
1

So you’re saying you didn’t mean that you’d think less of a woman (as a parter at least) if she’d slept around with random men before? At the least, “it wouldn’t impress me” sounds like a euphemism for that.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:26 AM
3

Okay dude.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 07:07 AM
-3

Girl.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 04:12 AM
19

BPD? Bold assumption to say you’re sure somebody has that specific mental illness because they were a part of a bad breakup. the vast vast majority of bitches don’t have BPD. Often people just suck.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 04:06 AM
0

Uh, shit, this is a depressing perspective. I mean, obviously you’re entitled to exclude relationships with whomever but it’s not like traumatized people are even typically broken. Most people have some kind of mental bullshit they’ve dealt with, and it can often involve abuse of some sort, but people can usually manage that kind of thing with time & support
/r/MensRights25/05/21 07:38 AM
1

I feel you’re underestimating how easy it is to do that. Both in regards to proof and the social, financial, and personal nuances of it all.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 07:35 AM
2

Right.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 04:07 AM
2

Or, consider that they may put bisexual on their profile because they’re bisexual? I’m not saying there are no straight girls faking bisexuality, but it’s probably not a majority I feel. It’s not like being bisexual is such an off-the-wall claim to make
/r/MensRights07/09/20 11:06 PM
4

I assumed it was a dude- who knows why- but the comments seem to be inferring it’s a lady, which is probably more likely
/r/MensRights07/09/20 11:04 PM
16

It’s an quote from George Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’. Maybe you knew that and I missed your knowing play on it, but, I just thought I’d throw this out there in case. In the novel, the quote is a play on the original goal of the characters (“all animals are equal”) to demonstrate the flaws in communism that are in full force by the end of the story. “Equal” refers to an ideal of everyone having the same rights, opportunities, and luxuries specifically (as opposed to man’s rule), but, even in the nove…
/r/MensRights06/08/20 08:24 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 06:42 PM
2

It’s not like I believe it enough to bet on it, like I said. But hey, thanks dude, I appreciate the genuine compliment. :)))
/r/MensRights10/07/20 09:24 PM
1

You’re right on the first front. I said that to establish that I know why you’d doubt a stranger on the internet, that’s natural. Remember brain tumor kid? Doubt is reasonable, at a base level. I just also believe situational factors (like illustration, an old account, detailed comments contextualizing, the subreddit we’re on, etc) can make it more or less likely that a person is lying, which is what I went on to elaborate upon. I don’t think it’s cold to be doubtful of people on Reddit assertin…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 09:07 PM
2

It’s more than a touch difficult to get receipts from somebody in real life, let alone the internet, about their sexual assault. In any situation, like a legal case, obviously people need proof. But, if somebody is just posting online I don’t see why it would make sense to ask. People lie on the internet all the time for clout or karma or whatever, but in this case there’s no reason to suggest OP would. If we assume OP is telling the truth about their sexual assault, our greatest risk is comfort…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 08:53 PM
1

u/undeleteparent
/r/MensRights10/07/20 05:46 PM
1

Are you just intentionally trying to be a dick? Rape isn’t cool, but it can happen regardless of whether somebody has legal record of it. And, as the person quite literally illustrated, being male makes people disbelieve them. Beyond getting on certain meds, you can’t really have autism “looked at”, but, since OP identities themself as autistic, it’s likely enough to assume they’re been diagnosed. And since this comment implies they’ve seen therapists, it’s no stretch to assume they’re taking ca…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 05:44 PM
5

It’s just a matter of semantics. You’re right that the phrasing is wrong, but, they explained that they mean the same thing as non-binary AMAB
/r/MensRights10/07/20 05:36 PM
4

That’s pretty typical for r/teenagers though, because...teenagers.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 03:49 AM
1

Not really. Hardly funny in the humble opinion of the person who wrote it
/r/MensRights23/05/20 09:33 PM
74

Wow, that’s an awful rapper name. If you want to be DaBaby why not go all the way and call yourself Lil’ Infant
/r/MensRights23/05/20 11:46 AM
13

Or, unless, they just wanna wear makeup. Plenty of people do. I mean. It’s kinda just glorified face paint, isn’t it? I don’t want it on my face, but I feel like it’s kinda whoever’s prerogative, dude.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 01:45 AM
6

Not every kid needs a father, but every kid should have a good parent or parents like this guy. I mean, really the world just needs less shitty parents overall regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 07:14 AM
1

“Katy Perry is awful” is really nothing new. Tragically.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 07:11 AM
1

What subreddit was it? You know...for future reference?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:19 PM
0

Exactly.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:50 AM
2

Then, don’t get married? Unless long-term guarantee of sex isn’t necessary to you.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:33 AM
2

Dude, it’s cool if you only want a relationship with a woman for sex. It’s cool as long as that’s the mutual understanding. Really.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:32 AM
0

Well then it doesn’t really seem like you want a relationship with a woman- or, not something long-term like a marriage at least. Exclusively sexual relations, maybe? Which is fine, just different.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 10:34 PM
1

The action of sex is not vital to any individual person’s survival. Better?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 10:31 PM
-7

Yes, it’s selfish to recognize your partner has an issue that’s important to them (in this case, lack of sex) and not be willing to (or, feel able to) compromise. And it’s also selfish to expect (and/or be upset at not getting) somebody to comply to something that is not your inherent right to get from them. Truly not wanting to have sex, IS a good reason to deny your partner sex. Besides, if wanting to have sex isn’t a mutual thing, how great of sex is it really? Seems like the happiness quotie…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:34 PM
2

I don’t believe google translate uses the word ‘thots’.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:13 PM
-6

Nobody ‘needs’ sex. I don’t think people with vastly different sex drives can function in a happy marital relationship (unless they’ve come to terms with it, because love). But still, sex is not a need of men or women. Come on...we’re humans, not animals. Even if you cite most people needing to get off to be healthy, masturbation exists. So, sexual desires are valid, but they’re no excuse to break the trust of somebody you love. Just, maybe consider talking about it. “I know you don’t feel this …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:12 PM
-7

You’re still essentially saying a wife owes her husband sex- ‘owing’ doesn’t have to be literal obligation, social obligation means the same thing. Sex isn’t doing the laundry- expecting somebody else to do their least favorite chore, because you want to do it, just because they ‘committed’ to it, is selfish. Anyway, marriages get worse over time 90% of the time. Usually couples have sex towards the beginning and it just kinda...happens less over time. If anything, that should be what’s expected…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:05 PM
27

If you don’t want to have sex and are married to somebody who has a high sex drive (or even a lower, but still present/important one), perhaps you just shouldn’t have gotten married to that person. Better that than forcing yourself to have sex with someone out of (social) obligation or having sex with an unenthusiastic wife. (Of course this applies the reverse way and to any couple, but this usually is a straight guy/gal problem. )
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:00 PM
17

Overly defensive women are the product of overcompensation. Overcompensation that was originally needed to get to the point of workplace equality (in the US, at least), but that’s now useless in most situations.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 12:53 AM
18

It’s not the person with colored hair who had anything to do with talking about the statistic, is it?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter