TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

millertime73 Archive

View 5 posts and 339 comments by millertime73 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

What's interesting is I could see something this innocuous making an SRSer with a feminist single mom shit their pants.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:29 PM
-11

stuffthatdoesnthappen.txt. This must be Paul Elam under a fake account. Sincerely, SRS
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:19 PM
-5

I'm sure I'll get downvoted, but let's be real here for a minute. There seems to be a recurring pattern, wherein many of these progressive, social justice crusader types with too much free time develop mental problems and/or kill themselves. I've seen it multiple times with acquaintances in my own personal life. At the risk of being an extremely shitty armchair psychologist, I have to wonder what so often makes these people hate themselves so much. I think part of it is not having a real job, wh…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:06 PM
-2

TIL, questioning feminism makes one part of a hate group. One wonder if people realize, how dangerous letting liberals quell dissent and dictate the terms of the whole conversation is? Eventually, there may be little to no conversation, with reason taking a back seat to pure whackadoo feminist theory.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:29 PM
0

You can't expect rational dialogue with people like OThompson. Today's lefties have the political memory of a goldfish. It's as if they've convinced themselves that the last 30 years of leftist hate spewed at any men's issue just didn't happen. The MR movement existed well BEFORE Reddit and the early activists were 90% conservative while those who actively fought against MR issues were 90% liberal. The mental gymnastics the lefties on here go through to reconcile their politics and their newfoun…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 03:49 PM
2

Google David Reimer, his case help break the flawed and wrong notion that gender is purely a social construct. The only ones still clinging to this outdated theory are dinosaur feminists and those in soft sciences like Sociology, Women's Studies, etc.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:54 PM
6

The problem starts before university though, since 75% of school teachers are now female, it having become a profession hostile to males. In the US, the only males typically allowed to thrive and advance working in public schools (outside of coaches) are effeminate, androgynous non-threatening types.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:33 PM
12

Seeing things like this must make an SRS'ers dick hard.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:26 PM
3

Nice logic. I guess women should stay out of men's spaces when you know, man talk is going on. After all, people should stay in their areas.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:38 AM
17

In a marriage break up, a man's facade of strength can be his greatest weakness, while a woman's facade of weakness can be her greatest strength. Men often want to be the good guy and white knight in the courtroom, meanwhile after the crocodile tears the "weak" woman is chatting with her friends about how to financially rape you. Best advice for any man is to immediately put feelings aside, because regardless of outward appearances, they almost always are.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:36 AM
0

Women only do this because they are emulating patterns set forth by the patriarchy. Still men's fault. Checkmate MRA's. Sincerely, ShitRedditSays
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:08 PM
1

...and who do the majority of sports scholarships go to? Minorities. Good job lefties.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:22 PM
0

I really, really, really don't care about stuff like this. Being hyper-sensitive waters down the true issues that affect us. In fact, I have to wonder if this isn't a troll post.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:14 PM
5

I've always thought it odd that in one breath the left devalues fathers and fatherhood, then in the next breath they complain that today's grown men in their 30's just want to play Xbox and smoke weed on the couch instead of working a backbreaking well paying job to support...a woman and his family. If anyone would like an Apros Pos example of the left's feelings on fatherhood, note that Reddit exploded with tales of great fathers and their contributions on father's day. The twenty SRS subreddit…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:09 PM
3

What's funny is how the SRS types emasculate themselves by believing things like this, then can't barely if ever get laid by their own supposed feminist allies. Human base instincts are a funny thing and regardless of what some people tell you, women don't respond to eunuchs. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:33 PM
3

I used to worry about this a lot, as I played in some regionally popular indie rock bands way way back when and used to attract the feminist college girl types like flies. Looking back, I probably should've avoided all the "Tori Amos" type feminist victimhood junkies, but their mental issues did make them fun in bed (for about two weeks). I suppose that's how I ended up arrested on my front porch for a false claim of aggravated rape supposedly the night before, from a girl I hadn't even seen in …
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:28 PM
0

She already had another succesful video that shows how Lego makes macho toys, girls have set roles. Today I learned that because one woman on youtube said so, plastic blocks are insidious tools of the patriarchy. You should watch calling other people moron, because you come across like a massive idiot yourself.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 09:30 PM
6

Translation: "No one cares about men falsely imprisoned for rapes that never happened". Thanks for proving the fucking point.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 09:24 PM
1

Seeing all the love for fathers on Reddit today must have the SRS'ers shitting their pants. They are doing their best to ignore it and it puts a huge smile on my face. You just know they're all just sitting there steaming in mom's basement, sifting through the love desperately trying to find something that offends them.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 09:15 PM
0

Liberal men probably want to pee sitting down anyways.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:05 PM
7

thingsthatneverhappened.txt Women do not lie about rape. She was probably forced to say she was raped because of cis men's power, privilege and patriarchy. Sincerely, SRS
/r/MensRights26/05/12 01:45 PM
2

I attended a speech of his in the early 80's as a requirement for a magnet school I was in. I recall for every thirty seconds he spent talking about civil rights for African Americans, he spent five minutes talking about HIS struggle, HIS personal sacrifice, HIS accomplishments. I recall meeting him afterward and feeling like he was a really creepy guy.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:51 AM
4

I suppose it's progress, but given that the HuffPo types were across the board laughing at men's rights ten years ago, it still feels slightly awkward to see the same people admitting there are issues there.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:43 AM
6

I have personally met Morris Dees (the founder of SPLC), he is quite smug and full of himself. He also appears to be somewhat of a scam artist, using overt sensationalism a la Al Sharpton to continue fundraising for his millionaire lifestyle via the SPLC. Just Google his name, the dirt is on the first page of search results. I would have a hard time trusting anything that came from his organization.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:35 AM
1

What's this then? To be fair, that could mean anything. One could say war is part of the natural order of things.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:44 AM
-1

...but female privilege and male disposability is well entrenched among righties. This was a very valid argument into the late 90's, early 2000's. However today, people who have this attitude are rapidly disappearing from the conservative side of the fence. We are also now beginning to have judges and DA's who were products of 80's divorce culture and know the damage that putting women on a pedestal can do. In addition, I don't think acknowledging that nearly 100% of MRA antagonists who hate our…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:01 AM
5

I put men's rights first above religion and politics. Quick question, how many MRA hating conservatives come out of SRS? Nearly 100% of the people who hate this sub-Reddit, who actively seek to marginalize men's issues and try continuously to disrupt conversation, are lefties. Knowing this, one can easily see why seeking to ignore the political aspect of MR issues constantly comes up for people of a particular political persuasion. It's an ugly, uncomfortable truth, but better to deal with it th…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:48 PM
3

Damn. There is a lot of stuff on here that's below threshold. Ignatius essentially implied that the traditional conservative MRA posters here were somehow "white nationalists". Now, the facts don't bear this out at all, but people of a particular political persuasion on Reddit often take things they want to see and run with them, reality be damned. To his his credit, Ignatius clarified this conflation deep in the comments, but the unfounded assertions still have the upvotes. I suppose it would b…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:02 PM
3

Reading comprehension. I has it. Apprently not. Evidence of this laughable white nationalist conspiracy bullshit, or STFU. It is made up nonsense. I've also been on this site longer than you You are so cool. I bet you have more Reddit trophies.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:25 PM
1

Taking a quote out of context. Nice. To be fair, that's how all this white nationalist nonsense got started.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:19 PM
2

Don't tiptoe around this shit. Anti-women's rights IS anti women, and white nationalists ARE racist. Full stop. Yes, full stop. Nobody named above has promoted white nationalism. What happened was some MRA's were called white nationalists by a mod, and when asked for evidence of this, were given a quote that had NOTHING to do with white nationalism. How fucking laughable that you people buy this shit, because you want to see it so badly, that if you don't find it you invent it.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:08 PM
9

The reason most conservatives don't support equal rights for women I think this sentence might be a little misleading for people that don't understand where conservatives are coming from. Most all conservatives support true equal rights, but not some bastardized idea of equal rights which has good intentions, but leaves men with the shit end of the stick and very little equality in practice. Until you can demonstrate a way of convincing society to treat men and women as equally disposable, this …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:08 PM
5

I've had debates with Ignat where I explained to him the difference between racial nationalism and nationalism and how I fall into the nationalist side of the camp I wonder if some of what you are talking about has elements of in-group, out group behavior based on culture instead of racism. For instance, Scott Fujita is a caucasian American football player, who openly culturally identifies himself as Japanese. He speaks Japanese and was raised in an adopted family by Japanese parents. I doubt he…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:43 PM
8

The reason self-identifying as an MRA has always been so distasteful to me is precisely its history as a conservative/traditionalist movement. Men like that wish to set men back decades, way more than any feminist. This might have been somewhat true in the 1990's and early 2000's, but today, the "women firsters" are exponentially disappearing from the conservative side of the fence. As newer family court Judges and DA's are often products of 80's divorce culture themselves, they increasingly und…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:40 PM
7

Here is a claim to being a nationalist: No, not racist. Nationalist. Contrast the difference between Katrina and the Tsunami that took out Fukoshima if you want to know why nationalism is a good thing. I don't mean to be conflating the issues, and I am not accusing conservatives of being racists. To be fair, I'm not sure this rises to the level of supporting white nationalism. The context here, is the Japanese culture and whether or not the Japanese were being racist. Japan, as an isolated islan…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:29 PM
4

Agreed. Fortunately, these guys have admitted to both. While not explicit, the use of the word "etc" seemed to make an implicit judgement that this was a standard position amongst conservative MRAs. In addition, I know these two have some traditionalist viewpoints, but I've never seen any egregious racism posted by them. white nationalists (notice I never said "racist"). When one Googles Stormfront, the very first result is "White Nationalist Community". I haven't seen this type of rhetoric from…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:20 PM
-19

It is pretty clear that Demonspawn/Jeremiah/etc believe in traditionalism and want to remove rights for women You are using a broad brush here. Believing in traditional roles for family != wanting to take away rights for women. The validity of stay at home moms and the damage that fatherless homes cause in middle to low income homes is pretty well documented by now. The desire of lefties to constantly pursue this "taking women's rights away" narrative is the impetus behind at least some of the s…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:48 PM
20

I think a lot of us were for men's rights, before we knew the term or movement existed. In essence, men's rights is essentially human rights, whereas feminism tends to be infected with the idea that we can solve the problems of both genders by focusing on one.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 05:46 PM
9

It's actually not very creative, but it would be more impressive if you'd actually give evidence instead of making generalizations. I have evidence on my side and did in the original argument. You don't. Yawn, anyone one who reads through the hateful shit show in SRS knows exactly what I'm talking about. The whole excuse for your sub-Reddit seems to be, "But it isn't bigotry when we do it". Bringing Rush Limbaugh somehow into this doesn't change that. Clearly, I struck a nerve, you probably know…
/r/seduction23/02/12 10:03 PM
8

In light of this, you probably shouldn't be a hysterical fucktard. That's laughable. I'm simply saying, that SRS'ers like yourself would probably make terrible fathers. I stand by that, based on the self loathing, hysterical tone of your sub-Reddit. I can imagine you guys now, sitting your 4 year old boy down to tell him what a piece of shit he is for being a white male. Sure, some privilege exists, I'm not sure anyone completely denies that. However, life isn't fair and the histrionics of your …
/r/seduction23/02/12 09:57 PM
7

The context is Reddit, not raising your own kids; trying to connect the two in order to discredit the message is dishonest. I see it as relevant, I'm looking at the big picture here. Perpetuating this idea that there is an evil white boogeyman around every corner, just waiting to pounce on the innocent and under-privileged is silly. It's something that SRS does as a whole and one can't help but wonder, how would that translate into the early 20's aged kids of SRS eventually being fathers and pas…
/r/seduction23/02/12 06:46 PM
3

Anyway, when you know how to notice this kind of misogynist, privileged-white-dude-in-denial shit everywhere Dude, I swear I hope you never raise any boys. Passing on that sort of paranoid delusion that there is an evil white boogeyman around every corner, just waiting to crush the feelings of the innocent and downtrodden with his mighty privileged attitude is psychotic. Perpetuating that sort of nonsense on a kid would border on child abuse.
/r/seduction23/02/12 05:54 PM
4

If 10 years isn't a long enough professional career to have a sexual harassment claim filed against me, I guess I'm doing something wrong. Or right? Well, I guess if you two think it's no problem, let's pack it up and shut this sub-Reddit down, show's over. But seriously, we take a lot for granted about what people say things when posting on the internet, so I'm assuming you really have ten years in a professional career. Most people who have 10-15 years in a professional career have seen this s…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:29 PM
4

I know how to act professional at work, so I have never had to fear losing my job because of a sexual harassment claim. Also, if you're a valuable employee the company will make an effort to keep you despite a sexual harassment claim. That's really naive and indicative of someone without a lot of experience in a professional career.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:10 PM
5

I like the seat belt analogy, and hope you don't mind if I steal it? Anything you need. Keep up the good work at your blog!
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:23 PM
0

I'm laughing so hard at their impending demise.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:10 PM
13

I run False Rape Society, and I can tell you that the possibility of such accusations being lodged is generally slim, but it is real. This is a really important point. Even of the chance is only 1%, why would any rational person expose themselves to potentially losing everything, when they don't have to? I have never been in an auto accident, but you can be sure I myself and my toddler wear a seat belt, as risking everything isn't worth it just to be a little more relaxed. In other words, while …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:52 PM
33

The women in my office use the most sexual innuendo and crude language of anyone. The way the laws and policies are applied, it's almost as if women have become the new chauvinists. They can essentially say whatever they want with impunity, then if a male responds likewise, off to HR with you.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:32 PM
3

I know a lot of men who have faced sexual harassment. Although personally I think it's not harassment unless it goes beyond words or ends up in threats/blackmail etc. Hmm, I would say my issues included, but were not limited to: Half of pre-shift discussing gay sex Said discussions including how to make the restaurant more gay, why the restaurant wasn't gay enough, etc. Discussions including leering glances at me as the straight guy every time this happens Only choices for after work beers being…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:04 PM
3

the problem is that there is only one sub-reddit with the name "men's rights" and that's this one. I've thought about that, surely someone is creative enough to come up with a good name that would come up under search queries. MRAunderground, Men'sIssues, etc.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:06 AM
6

It wasn't my place to out the guy at work, even though that would've pretty well cleared him I think. I did reach out with a few texts right afterward, then he started crushing on me thinking it was something else, it got awkward so I let it go. I think he was depressed and drinking a lot the week after and just hadn't found another job yet. The whole thing had a stranger than fiction vibe to it. I quit the company a few months after, I was pretty disgusted even though I had been there for years…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:44 AM
10

From your perspective yes, but that doesn't mean that the management of the business should be able to enact policies to that effect, officially or otherwise. I think an "off the record" conversation about how to protect oneself is vastly different than putting something in the employee handbook that says "Don't interact with women". The advice, was to keep interactions completely work related if you value your job. I see nothing wrong with that. If you want to do these things, that's your prero…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:34 AM
18

If male employees want to avoid co-workers for any particular reason, that's their prerogative, but it's highly discriminatory and plainly unfair for management to propose such a policy. Due to the long hours, the industry I work in has a lot of men with stay at home wives. Protecting our family home and livelihood trumps someone else needing to feel included in the office. I think my boss was awesome in laying all the cards on the table, this is today's reality. I keep it work related, otherwis…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:37 AM
22

Management should not be encouraging male employees to isolate female employees. It's risk reduction. My career track is hard to break into and is often cut throat. Why risk a high paying professional job to share jokes and small talk with a woman at work? I got that advice ten years ago and keeping a solid personal distance in the office has served me pretty well since. Five years ago, I worked with someone who became friends with a girl at work. For a short while they were buddies, hanging out…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 01:27 AM
1

One of ignatiusloyola's biggest problems is he's still a kid in school That in and of itself isn't bad, it's great to have students involved. However, it sure seems pertinent when someone is trying to moderate. Much like he has faith in Leftism, he has faith in his always being right, and he will never accept someone challenging his views. What's odd, is he seems to be going to a faith based school for a science degree. That is, unless he just likes putting the name of a school he doesn't go to …
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:14 PM
0

Unlike ignatius, I'm an MRA. I think his biggest problem, is that he's a kid still in school. He doesn't have a family, has never had kids, been married or gained enough life experience to effectively understand a broad swath of men's issues. I think that's partly why he's so blatantly leftist, he still believes leftist theory sounds good. Many people grow up and modify their beliefs after they graduate because outside of the cocoon of school, a lot of leftist theory is pipe dreams and bullshit.…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:42 PM
46

My first week at a new engineering job, a senior project manager took me and two other recent hires (both males) aside in a conference room. The gist of the ensuing "off the record" talk, was this: "Do not talk to women here about anything that doesn't directly concern your work. Do not hang out in the doorway of their office and make small talk. Do not e-mail them anything doesn't directly concern your job. Never be in their office with the door closed for any reason." "This is a high pressure …
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:17 PM
3

Pierce, this guy is a known troll. Save yourself the effort.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 08:40 PM
3

One woman went to a bar to meet her date and ending up getting obliterated then going home with this guy, leaving her date. She was also late to relieve the babysitter. The other woman also got shithoused drunk of her own free will, doing vodka shots, then actually took a cab TO to this guy's place. The one thing in common is they BOTH admit to is being ignored for several days following the drunken sex. Looks like they may have bonded over that and showed him pretty good. Oh well, not calling t…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:28 PM
1

Not familiar with the Deal Colleague guidelines.. does that only apply to the campus hearings? Last year, it fundamentally changed how these types of cases are handled in US schools. The standard of evidence was lowered to preponderance of the evidence, instead of reasonable doubt. Now, if it appears 49.999999% you are innocent, you are to be found guilty and likely expelled with a permanent sexual assault finding on your transcript. This means your academic life is essentially over, as no schoo…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:27 PM
2

so why not put up a fight to prevent this from happening to others in the future? Under the new "Dear Colleague" guidelines, not being able to have your attorney speak and not being able to question your accuser in these proceedings certainly seems like an egregious violation of due process. While it is going to take a lawsuit to stop this bullshit, I can understand why this man would not want to face a kangaroo court, where he has little ability to even defend himself.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:04 PM
1

It's a tough spot. Running away was not the answer. The West Memphis Three had to stop fighting for their innocence and admit Alford/Guilty pleas just to get out of jail. The way I understand it, there are myriad instances in law where in fighting to win, you effectively lose. Many times innocent people want things to go away, so their reputation isn't dragged through the dirt for life like William Kennedy-Smith or the Duke Lax team.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:40 PM
1

Alot of women are bored and love drama. Any will do. We definitely glorify female victimhood in America. Tori Amos built an entire career out of it after failing for years. One could go to one of her concerts in the late 90's and see the teenage girls up front gazing adoringly at the stage, swaying side to side while holding a rose to throw towards Tori as they whispered to each other "Is this it? Is this the rape song?". One can't help but wonder if this pervasive glorification of other people …
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:31 PM
17

This is where the SRS types want to treat women as children. If a man and a woman are both equally drunk, they believe the woman is not capable of handling herself or giving consent. I have been in situations in college where I was extremely wasted and ended up hooking up with girls I would have never touched otherwise or barely remember. I must've been raped ten times according to the feminist definition. What I especially love, is how they believe a man can't possibly get his dick hard being b…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:20 PM
4

Aren't there ethical considerations for the bar association and the law schools about student who may be alcoholics and then become lawyers. This is a very important point. The comments section indicates that one of the women has a small child at home, is a known raging binge drinker and has made two similar allegations before this guy. How scary is that? In New Orleans, we have three law schools. The trend from many people I've known in Law School has been to use Adderall to stay up until 3:00 …
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:38 PM
3

Wow, that would be awesome. I understand if she won't comment, but the murkiness in details makes understanding this all the more difficult.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:25 PM
6

To the extent that I believe anything in that story it appears that everyone involved has pretty bad judgement. The guy got drunk and had sex with women. Is that something college kids shouldn't do? My concern here, is that we seem to be treating women like children when alcohol is involved. We are essentially telling them, "You are not adult enough to be responsible for what you do when you are drunk, you cannot handle alcohol". Regrettable drunk sex, appears to now be a form of sexual assault.…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 05:10 AM
11

There's not enough evidence in that article to accuse any person involved of anything, neither the male of being a rapist nor the women of being 'victimhood junkies'. She's out there demanding that her name be used. In addition, she was so drunk she was vomiting on the sidewalk, then took a cab to his place. Not to mention, what kind of rapist let's people stay the night? Why do you think he'll "never get in to another law school"? From a fellow law student in the comments section... "By withdra…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:16 AM
1

Didn't one the most famous feminists ever, Germaine Greer, write a coffee table book with photographs extolling the beauty of pre-pubescent boys? Amazon.com Interesting how what is unquestionably jailworthy CP on Reddit, is suddenly high art when a respected feminist does it with a book deal.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 09:27 PM
3

AnnArchist, well, I think that's self-explanatory. He's essentially inactive in this sub-Reddit, therefore one can't reasonably say that the right side of the spectrum is represented amongst moderators.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 09:09 PM
4

I think this is a great idea, but for the love of God please make sure there is some political diversity amongst the new mods.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 06:57 PM
4

Beep boop?
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:18 PM
4

Beep boop?
/r/MensRights16/02/12 01:04 AM
3

remember earlier this week when reddit was full of pedo content because everyone but Srs was content Attention SRS: If a douche beats his wife every day and then stops a bank robbery, he's still a douche that beats his wife. Being a part of doing one good thing does not make up for you shitting on everything else. Stop acting like you guys were part of breaking up an international child slavery ring with the FBI, you got a few sub-Reddits with questionable pictures deleted. GREAT. It doesn't giv…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 12:59 AM
4

I read that it said "functional" and thought that clearly doesn't make any sense or why would you bother posting that. Yeah, it's ArchangelleDworkin trying to troll through edits 12 hours later. He/she was made a fool of and clearly wants to throw the scent off the trail. ...or bitter because no women will have sex with you. I love this constant argument from the SRS'ers. First breath, "You MRA's as a group are assholes because you don't recognize all of your massive amounts of money, power and …
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:51 PM
5

Now I'm curious. Do you by chance remember what it said before the edit or have a screen shot? It said... This will make our mod mail non-functional. It was AD whining that their mass bannings make their mod mail useless. AD removed the "non", after being stomped into the ground and laughed at. You can really tell the SRS trolls feel awkward outside of their comfort zone. I honestly started to grab a screenshot late last night, then my toddler woke up and I closed the laptop to put him back to b…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:29 PM
17

...but now that all of reddit hates them... I think this is an area where ignatiusloyola might have had the right strategy in letting them run amok after all. They have clearly generated a massive amount of ill will amongst the broader Reddit userbase. Their methodology of baiting people, banning them without discussion and subsequently attacking them personally has resulted in people who may otherwise agree with them, absolutely hating them. It's also clear that by insulating themselves in thei…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:30 PM
10

Word.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:42 AM
–

I can understand that, but I think because some of these same people have enabled pretty vicious personal attacks against MRA posters here such as GWW, it's fair game. In addition, people such as myself who have been through the ebb and flow of this movement for a long time, sometimes need a little levity and brightness in their day to stay sane. Lastly, there is no link to SRS, it is solely to r/modnews. This is a bright spot in Reddit and I'm sure a few people will smile over it.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:36 AM
3

Sometimes I wonder if their hate and anger is the thin membrane of sanity over a vast chasm of pain. Thoughtful observation. You're way too sane and insightful for Reddit, get out while you can.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:03 PM
3

What does this have to do with father's rights? You can't troll a troll, son.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:00 PM
5

It's a troll to piss you people off. Hth You are so very brave. Thank you for fighting the good fight against fathers that care about their sons. Now, your entire sub-reddit should really make the world a better place and Whitney Houston yourselves.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 04:33 PM
11

Cause - effect. They are a reaction to the rest of reddit FYI Translation: "It's not bigotry when we do it". Roffle. Holy fucking shit you are stupid.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:49 PM
-2

Just a hunch, but something tells me you are a hideously ugly person.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:12 PM
-3

The "people" in SRS are less than human. I agree with this. People like them are the best argument for abortion on the planet.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:55 PM
1

A lot of the problem in the big picture, is some people here believe that if we just reach out and try to appease the men's rights antagonists, there will be progress and some sort of middle ground reached, maybe even a group hug. It's somewhat naive and reminds me a little of John McCain's 2008 presidential run, where he thought he could be friends with those in the media that hated him. It worked briefly, then all the liberals turned on him, stabbed him in the back and John McCain was stunned …
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:35 PM
1

I understand what you're saying, but it still seems odd. I know, I'm probably not explaining it well at all. One tries to treat everyone equally, but the reality is there is only a finite amount of time and attention to give. When it gets tight and you have a lot of tables, compromises get made. Yes, sometimes one person will complain vocally that a friend or wife didn't get the same exact service and attention they did; however the vast majority of the time people will be selfish and a man (or …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:20 PM
2

Man that is bizarre, if the restaurant isn't giving the woman I'm with good service I'm not happy. I believe this is at least partially a consequence of men generally paying. As somebody who worked in a James Beard award winning restaurant during school, it works like this: You pay attention to who is leading and/or directing the meal. This is a good indicator of who is going to pay and this is the person whose perception of the meal matters the most, because they tip. While some people will get…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:57 PM
4

You think it is accidental they purposely saddle your soft-major degree'd ass with student loan debt then giggle as you sit on wall street chanting you are the 99% until you get kicked out? It's the irony of all ironies, isn't it? I personally knew a guy who had a mental breakdown while making sandwiches at Subway. He had two liberal arts degrees (including a masters) from two different prestigious top tier private colleges along with massive six figure debt. He tried teaching high school, it wa…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:43 PM
2

I might counter argue that you seem to be coming from a perspective of intellectual superiority generated by your own experiences/anecdotes. The David Reimer case referenced in my post is highly scientifically documented, not anecdotal. It is also a pertinent example of cases in social science where progressive ideas have become dogma, to the willful exclusion of the facts and the detriment of children. You're a smart guy, you have to know that Social sciences easily lend themselves to broad and…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:31 PM
-4

I'm not sure why young people seek to earn degrees in art, theater, soft sciences, or other niche fields of study, and then expect to be showered with money after they graduate. In America at least, liberal arts education is essentially a legal pyramid scheme. You have a group at the top, say the college advisers, counselors, professors and the like who make a comfortable living off the mass amount of wide eyed students racking up massive student loan debt annually. They sell them in their compa…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:58 PM
4

"Equal rights" is a social theory propagated in liberal arts classes. I realize that there is a wide variation in attitudes and group think present amongst professors across different campuses. In my and my wife's experiences at three different large schools, "equal rights" was a difficult term to pin down. My experience has been one of hearing outrageous hyperbole on actual social inequality presented as fact, while the mere mention of any men's issues were scorned, as if deviating from the sta…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:27 PM
5

What? I thought they were joking. Half of the stuff on there are instances of sarcasm taken out of context. They're actually being serious? I think they've smartly taken a cue from Jon Stewart's M.O. in that regard. Make serious political statements within the context of jokes, so that when called out on leaving out key facts or clearly pursuing an agenda, one can hide behind the circle jerk and say "Oh, but I'm just a comedian doing the 23 skidoo, I wasn't being serious so falsehoods or omissio…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:59 PM
–

I think a challenge here, is many MRA's tend to be older, more experienced people who get here through an epiphany after they realize that many social theories propagated in liberal arts classes don't square with what happens in the real world. Thus, many MRA's are busy working, raising children and dealing with the daily rigors of life. Many SRS'ers, however, are very young and easily lead around by the nose by people like community college Sociology professors. They tend to have a fuck-ton of …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:50 PM
19

I could be mistaken, but I believe one of the Reddit admins is a mod in SRS. Either way, most of this faux moralism by the SRS nutters is really at its core just an attempt to head off the idea that people of their political ilk are soulless people with no integrity or morals. In the macro, they don't really care about these issues for a second, it's overcompensating to change the perception of who they are. Sort of like a Public figure who gets outed for racism, who then goes out and gets a bla…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:34 AM
-1

Just to let you know, had this same thing happened in campus housing at school, according to new guidelines pushed by the Obama administration in their "Dear Colleague" memo you can be virtually guaranteed you would have been found guilty, been expelled and had sexual assault charges permanently on your transcript.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 09:48 PM
1

Here's the deal, when a woman hits a man, she's simply emulating patterns set forth by the patriarchy. This is the same way that lefties femsplain away rates of domestic violence in lesbian relationships. TL;DR Still a man's fault.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:18 PM
0

hints toward you being in possession of a mind that chained by propaganda and a poor understanding of history. Not really, I just find it an interesting factoid. Of course, one could go into some winded forensic psychological argument about their broken homes, but I like to keep it simple with this one.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 03:10 PM
-4

It will be a straw man however, because the guy is essentially one of their own. He is a conservative HATING, hetero-normative HATING, Christian HATING, emotionally driven hyper-liberal who got bent over a user name. He let his logic resistant emotions draw him into arguing and pick pecking on the keyboard all night and saying things that would've been at home on 4chan.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:00 PM
–

people elsewhere on Reddit are using it as an example of those nasty MRAs hating women Here's the funny part, those same people call MRA's a bunch of hetero-normative conservative Christian males intent on bringing back the old days. This guy is a bi-sexual, loudly atheist combative liberal. He is one of their own and its HILARIOUS that they are using him as an example of "bad MRA's". This guy has always been a loud, obnoxious doucheloaf who used the vlog format to set up straw men, then rant fo…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:49 PM
3

Hitler, Stalin, Saddam, all raised by single mothers.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:25 PM
3

I've worked with a lot of young women who have recently come from Russia and Eastern Europe. While they are often very nice and genuine at first, it takes about 3-6 months for many of them to become completely westernized and focused on money, cheating, selfishness, etc. (American pop culture) If you wanted a more traditional marriage focused on kids and family, you would almost have to leave the country to raise your odds of success.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:02 PM
-2

Bill Maher's rant on feminism is one of the ONLY decent things to ever come out of his mouth. I find him to sort of be like Bill Hicks, just repeating dumb canards about conservatives over and over. "All conservatives are racists that want to put poor people in concentration camps and poison your children's water!". Har Har. He is just an old creeper with a serious chip on his shoulder. He was probably fired by a conservative business owner in his twenties and has spent the rest of his life cryi…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 01:41 PM
–

Engineer here. I don't really count degrees in Sociology, Psychology or Basketweaving.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:36 PM
1

Look, clearly the patriarchy made her do this. Had child rearing duties been more evenly shared and she not faced the daily oppression of hetero cis white males, this would not have happened.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:22 PM
-48

The average liberal is as dumb as a box of hair. Banging your dick against a tree would be more fruitful than trying to talk to them. Just laugh at them and move on.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:15 PM
36

This should be in the sidebar. I'm not even joking, just titled "This is how it works".
/r/MensRights02/02/12 06:56 PM
0

Since you're posting literature written by 13 year old girls, I wonder what 13 year old boys think..... I think you might be confused as to what literature is. Literature traditionally connotes something a little more "weighty" than JPEG lists passed around Facebook.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 06:02 PM
-1

Which history? American? Yes, in America, one can usually trace a clear path to a Democrat for any institutionalized issue which affects men's rights. Serious flaws in VAWA, the "Dear Colleague" memo eliminating due process, The Bradley Bill putting soldiers and former hostages in jail for child support arrears, the list goes on. In fact, liberals often take great joy in any way these issues hurt men or boys, as its like payback for patriarchal sins of the past. See SRS for examples.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:45 PM
0

I think a major thing holding back men's rights is the perception people have that the movement is just a bunch of brainwashed angry rush Limbaugh listeners. Maybe some people should stop watching MSNBC and reading Huffpo or DailyKos, and actually get to know their neighbor. The liberal echo chamber can beat this drum until their dying breath, but it is still nonsense based in hate and fear. I became more interested only after I saw a substantial amount of people who go against my preconceived n…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:37 PM
-3

Traditionally, liberals have put up 90% of the roadblocks to MRA progress and caused 90% of the problems in the first place. Most people who have time and experience in the movement see this new influx of liberal johnny-come-latelies for what it is, a relatively recent phenomenon over the last few years from people who don't fully understand history.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 03:30 AM
-1

So Jimmy banged a page and made her stage manager, probably the first time that has ever happened.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:57 PM
2

I guess those 100 losers living off mom and their student loans from taking 12 hours in Sociology have a lot of free time to post?
/r/MensRights23/01/12 08:20 PM
4

SRS is a pretty good argument against evolution. They quite literally, have some of the dumbest people I have ever seen on the internet as regular posters. Go sit in their chat, the stupidity will make your eyes bleed.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:59 PM
1

So /SRS kept growing, because it attracts people SRS has "grown" because they ban people without explanation. Many people then make multiple accounts to try and figure out why the nutters of SRS keep banning them. Hence, 7,500 of their "subscribers" are actually banned accounts. They probably only have about 100 actual active users.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:50 PM
-1

If that's the case, it shouldn't be hard for you to find a link to video, and you're really stretching if you think The View = feminists. I mean, Camille Paglia calls herself "feminist" too... No true scotsman, I mean feminist, would ever say something like that.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:08 PM
-7

CITATION PLEASE You need a citation for the sky being blue or the Earth being round as well?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 04:46 PM
1

I don't see how those laughing at expressions of emotion aren't outliers. I think Joy Behar is a pertinent example and not an outlier. While obviously not a pure academic, she loudly and proudly self-identifies as a feminist, in addition to espousing feminist ideology on multiple nationally televised talk shows. She is a mainstream media figure and she is emblematic of the influence that feminism has on popular culture. When she has a male on her show she approves of, say Alec Baldwin, she says …
/r/MensRights19/01/12 04:45 PM
-2

What I love is how feminists for thirty years have told men that they need to show their emotions and be unafraid to cry. Then, the second a John Boehner or Newt Gingrich does, the same feminists are the first ones to scream "Haha! Pussy! Fag! Mangina! Look! Look!". It's one of the easiest examples of how full of shit and utterly disingenuous feminists are.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:44 PM
11

so an English professor should not be allowed to make comparisons with other languages when it it is relevant? The problem is that Sociology, Psychology and yes even English professors have continually used their position of authority within colleges to promote politically motivated ideas on gender as fact. More often than not, the ideas they share with the Women's Studies department over coffee have zero basis in biomedical science. Should they comment on gender as it relates to their field of …
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:34 PM
4

That was so witty. Are you some sort of super genius or something?
/r/MensRights17/01/12 05:27 PM
3

Go sit in their chat. It's honestly a huge group of forever alone losers and intellectual cowards, who band together from their mom's basements to circle jerk about progressive ideology in order to feel better about their vapid lives. Many are liberal arts majors (hence the uber-liberal group think), who simply take the minimum hours required to keep getting student loans and not have to grow up, move out and live in the real world. It's honestly a repository of some of the dumbest people on Red…
/r/MensRights17/01/12 03:04 PM
2

He can get women... Hugo Schwyzer types can't keep a woman... Anybody can exploit women's self esteem to get laid. Keeping a good woman beyond a hook up is about impossible for waifs like Hugo or the testosterone deficient nutcups of SRS.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 02:42 PM
6

I absolutely love this argument. These types yammer that MRA's are the typical white conservatives male, with all the money, power and privilege that obviously comes with that. Then they act like with all that money, power and privilege, we don't get pussy. It's the most obvious case of projecting you'll ever see, as the feminized, passive Hugo Schwyzer types can't keep a woman to save their life.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 06:04 AM
4

There is nothing funnier than a suburban white girl, driving a BMW paid for by daddy, living in an apartment paid for by daddy, taking women's studies classes and moaning about the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 05:17 PM
2

Reminds me of the Audrey Seiler case. Link. The sad fact is, we have glorified victimhood so much that many women actually long to be victims, so they can bask in the resulting attention. Tori Amos built a career out of it.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 05:09 PM
1

Ah yes, the noted feminist strongholds of Reddit and late night television. The "Alan Alda" type of liberal progressives, who say that men should be more like women and be open in their emotions, are the first people to yell "Pussy Fag Little Girl Mangina!!!!" when a guy they don't like actually does it. As far as Letterman, Stewart, Fallon, Leno, Kimmel, I would say all of these guys are quite in tune with that same form of disingenuous liberal progressivism.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 08:07 PM
0

Men act like tough guys because evolution has ensured this mechanism is what works to find a mate. The problem modern young guys often have, is they get confused because they are told by single mothers and liberals their entire youth that woman simply want a guy that is nice and respects their feelings and doesn't act on his evil testosterone. The young guys eventually learn through trial and error, that what women say they want and what they actually respond to, are two entirely different thing…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 07:11 PM
1

A substantial amount of "nice" feminists, passively approve of man hating elements of their ideology because they see it as some sort of societal payback for the sins of our fathers. As for why they would passively support the nutbar elements of feminism when they are raising boys themselves or pretend to care about a male partner, there has to be some sort of pathology involved. Perhaps severe narcissism, inability to empathize with others and/or process basic logic?
/r/MensRights15/01/12 06:49 PM
2

I would venture to guess, that the men's rights movement is more grass roots and tends to be populated with slightly older males, who have families to raise and less free time. Wikipedia editors work for free, which means many of them are students who use the free time that student loans help provide commingled with the de facto ideology (pro-feminist/anti-mra) present on the average college campus to keep information that makes them look bad, off their site.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 02:41 PM
4

Wikipedia is infested with pc liberals. Even if they aren't familiar with the MRM specifically, the majority of them will blindly support agenda based editing by SRS types if they are simply told MRA is a conservative movement.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 01:27 AM
4

I said in 2008 this president was going to be a disaster for due process and men's rights. This whole "Dear Colleague" mess is a crystal clear example of that being the case. I've been arrested and falsely accused by a girl who was mad I broke up with her, so I understand where you are coming from. The money situation sucks, but I would work three jobs to find a way to sue and make her pay for trying to ruin your life due to her own sluttiness.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:15 PM
7

I would say your average Insane Clown Posse fan is an order of magnitude more intelligent than anyone in SRS.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:03 PM
6

Yes I support dumb things You should've just ended your post there.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 10:57 PM
5

I wouldn't end up cringing so much because another MRA thinks a jaded redditor calling them a neckbeard is comparable to a black man being called a nigger. What is this, the oppression olympics? People bring this up because it's a simple example of how they are idiots.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 05:00 PM
1

Hi Barry. I just wanted to say that I really enjoyed you guys' whinefest on false accusations and r/beatingwomen. The irony was delicious.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 04:56 PM
7

You don't think even a single person might take it too far? Is that the litmus test? Should we ban video games and rap music too, because one person might possibly act on a call to action or be influenced by them? You guys are sounding like end of world old time tent revival preachers. "I tell you, the reckoning is coming, the end time is near, this is eeeeeeeeeeeeevil!!!!" I think the truth is, whenever MRA's gain ground or shed light on the radical, hurtful elements of feminism, people get ang…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 01:13 AM
7

You're going to get somebody killed, because all it takes is for just one of you to be that crazy. I wish I could see how hysterical and frazzled you guys are right now.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 12:37 AM
7

I'm calling it, when this sub gets taken down after some CNN story about somebody being attacked is released I'm going to say "I FRKING CALLED IT!" ...and when there is no great MRA 9/11 Armageddon attack, the hysterical, crazy MRA antagonists and sensitive waifs whipping themselves into a frenzy will look even dumber than they already do now. Seriously, you guys are starting to sound like end time revival preachers.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 12:33 AM
1

"But women couldn't vote 105 years ago..." Sincerely, Feminists
/r/MensRights20/12/11 06:57 PM
2

It's always better to let em say what they need to say, spew their spittle, and respond with calm logic than to silence them. I understand the thought process, but I disagree that it's always better. Look at how r/science is run, for example. They try to keep the conversation on point and eliminate the noise. When the trolls from SRS come in here to yammer their nonsense, it's like trying to have a conversation while a retarded toddler runs around eating their own crap. Allowing these people to …
/r/MensRights20/12/11 06:28 PM
3

Why do the mods allow trolls like Sophonax to post here? Honestly, it's like having one of those kids with a leash and a helmet on spazzing out in the middle of your conversation. If they were at least funny, original, or displayed any type of intellect at all I could understand, but this is just pure idiocy.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 06:02 PM
2

The site truly is about making good men - though crafted from a female's viewpoint rather than internally, by men themselves. This seems doomed from the start. It's somewhat like a deer writing a book on how to hunt it. Not to mention in my experience many, but not all women, only know what they don't want, not what they really want. For an example, ask your girl where she wants to go out to eat tonight, while you rattle off ten places until she decides on something.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 12:01 AM
8

Attention AVfM guys, if you are reading. You do great things and are a valuable resource. Everyone makes mistakes, for the love of God please take that down. Katherine's campaign is clearly tongue-in-cheek and this makes us look foolish and histrionic as a group.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 05:20 PM
0

What's funny is when I think of SRS posters, Corky from Life Goes On comes to mind.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 06:02 PM
-1

Please, most feminist women hate themselves on some fundamental level, perhaps because of their multiple abortions and general insanity, or maybe just daddy issues. No t-shirt will alter where their self esteem takes them, if anything, it would make them like me more.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:44 AM
-2

"Them" who are they? Feminists? They are not exactly the enemy, not all, some are quite the friend. I will agree that many modern young women who self-identify as feminist are simply ignorant and don't believe men have any issues at all; often they can be enlightened by simply pointing to simple inequalities that favor them. Still, the lack of any critical thinking commingled with the wholesale swallowing of a one-sided ideology would be troublesome.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 05:37 PM
-9

Why would anyone date a feminist? To be fair, some feminists into the college indie rock scene are cute and fun to use on the weekends, but I would never invest in them emotionally in any way or have kids with them, that would be insanity. I've always treated good conservative women like gold however, because they are worth it and have actual values.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 04:26 PM
1

comes into the irc room, waits 2 minutes and goes "yep. just checkin to see if you guys were still a bunch of wow-playing fat nerds drinking mountain dew" and well you get the picture What's funny is that on any given day, it takes about two minutes in the SRS chat to confirm that. What's really funny, is it shows the pure projection going on when SRS'ers roll out their stock "cis gendered white lonely MRA with no sex lives" nonsense.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:13 AM
3

how can you be an mra and still enforce heteronormativity...?? Because, MRA's exist solely to rain down our fiery patriarchy upon the downtrodden plebes of SRS, forever ruining your lives with things like non-inclusive language on the internet.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:02 AM
14

The nerds of SRS have no girlfriends. What else are they going to do?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 04:41 PM
2

Examples? Family law is rapidly evolving and becoming more fair, as father's rights are being addressed more often. Extended punitive alimony is being done away with in many states. Conservative women are becoming more involved in politics and running for office. "How are things not changing?" might be an appropriate question.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 10:12 PM
3

...conservative can genuinely be in favor of 'men's rights' when they're so slavishly beholden to restrictive gender roles... Please. The one area where "women firsters" set us back was in divorce and family court. Conservative notions on this are changing very rapidly, as children of the divorce culture of the 80's have felt the negative impact. All in all, 90% of the issues MRA's face are firmly rooted in liberalism. To deny this, is to stare at your garden and say "There aren't any weeds, the…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:17 PM
1

If liberals want to support the cause, great. I still find the notion a little masochistic and strange. It's like becoming a member of a union, then marching against unions. I don't see any way I could reconcile that without some severe cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:11 PM
4

I know but all we do is alienate our own when we say things like 'Leftism is the downfall of western society' because believe it or not, there are quite a few left leaning MRA's here who get really uncomfortable and defensive when the rabid right-wingers start making things political you get me? I'm not going to muzzle myself because someone might get their feelings hurt. I think most of the left leaning MRA's are simply people who have painted themselves into a corner politically for so long, t…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:00 PM
1

I think the stupidity of these people is more offensive than the video itself. This isn't some art-house short to really get people thinking, it's a simple minded grab for attention a la the Piss Christ exhibit years ago.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 06:03 PM
4

Holy shit, reading that posting history, one gets the feeling that every feminist stereotype of the bitter, forever alone, angry, sea hag is embodied in CBD.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:36 PM
1

Taking a women's studies class would be about as fun and fulfilling as banging your dick against a tree.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:19 PM
14

When I saw this, this first thing I thought of was it being a parody of what some believe the general feminist position to be. If that is the case, everyone here has fallen for it hook, line and sinker. Think of when the butthurt brigade at SRS posts jokingly about stealing men's sperm and foreskin, then does their little circle jerk tap dance at how witty they are. The funny thing is, parodies of this nature work because there is some element of truth to the original idea, meaning the need for …
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:13 PM
1

This is just funny now, women's stock isn't high enough for the princess demands any more. Like Dave Chappelle said, the market is flooded with pussy. They can't hold sex as a bargaining chip, it can be had somewhere else in about two seconds.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:19 PM
1

that wasn't an explanation of history, but if you don't understand how mentioning some historical facts contradicts your argument, thats cool i suppose. id stop making historical arguments if i was you. A Larry the Cable Guy version of history doesn't contradict anything, it's simply a Red Herring to distract from the point, which you both can't address. We assert that feminist ideology helped fan the flames of rape fear, especially on college campuses, which was the impetus for broadening the d…
/r/MensRights11/11/11 12:54 AM
1

and there was no major historical event that occured between 1911 and 1920 that may have shifted the cultural attitudes to the west, no siree. not to mention that its a bit ironic to proclaim the prohibition era as a time of loose morals when it was defined by the rise of moralists to power in government. hence, you know, the prohibition of alcohol. is your imagery of what the 1920s were like entirely taken for old noir movies? This is a sophomoric explanation of history and does not address the…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:31 PM
1

You stated that the simplest explanation was wrong, yet when called on it can't offer any alternative or explain why. That speaks for itself.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:01 PM
1

Why? I'm not the one trying to make the case. It doesn't make the statement somehow magically more valid just because I didn't provide a counter argument. That's what I thought.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:48 PM
-1

so in europe and america in 1911, women could not vote and were largely considered property of either their fathers or husbands. having 'drunk sex' in the modern concept of the idea didn't really happen. women would marry at 12 A few years later, we had the roaring twenties with flappers, speakeasies and sex. You are being more than a little histrionic and melodramatic with this. but of course you knew all this right because you'd be pretty damn stupid to bitch about something you knew absolutel…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:06 PM
0

...but erroneously identified the cause of it (feminism's push for sexism). I'd like to hear your root cause analysis, if you have the intellect.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:00 PM
1

I think during the next slut walk, we should have a murder walk within it, carrying large signs depicting women drowning their kids in bathtubs. It would almost be performance art.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:15 PM
2

I hear this is really a huge problem.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 03:55 PM
1

if marriage ever becomes your goal, a virgin bride has a much lower chance of divorcing you But according to the progressives, a girl with 150 chodes run through her is more experienced.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:43 PM
0

... it doesn't seem to be impossible. Perhaps here is where we hit subjective territory, from one person to the next. For someone raised within an open, positive church environment in middle America, who is well versed in the tenets of Christianity, it may seem impossible that a true Christian would consistently engage in inherently anti-family actions. However, for someone in LA who never attends church, has never read the bible, and whose only exposure to the word is televangelists on the even…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:50 PM
5

Lord only knows what type of Jabba the Hutt monstrosity you are balls deep in every night.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:18 PM
0

What did the liberals say about all the women coming out against Bill Clinton? Oh yeah, they were coming forward because it was like dragging a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park. Now these ladies, poor, poor victims.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:10 PM
0

Yeah, but it's relevant a lot too. Perhaps, but simply calling something a fallacy, does not make it so either. I'm not really religious, but I believe Christianity specifically addresses those who speak of the word, but do not live by it. This includes priests, leaders and followers. Since the bible itself calls out hypocrites and false prophets as not being true Christians, it doesn't seem a stretch to call out anti-family "Christians" who do not follow the word, as being false prophets and no…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 05:11 PM
1

People overuse this. Example: No truly good person would commit a random act of murder. Oh wait, No True Scotsman, Not True! A truly good person would! Rawr... Just because something is a fallacy is some cases, does not mean it is a fallacy in all cases. To believe that, would itself be a fallacy.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:26 PM
12

The "women firsters" on the right are a rapidly dying breed. Many of the christian conservatives of today are products of the 80's "me first" culture where women thought it empowering to divorce good husbands, take the home, alimony, child support, use the kids as weapons, then make it all the man's fault because they didn't "feel appreciated". The modern generation has seen personally the havoc and hurt that some selfish women have, with their male enablers, wrought on families. While there are…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:01 PM
1

No I don't, you are a liar. I've never brought that up or mentioned that word on Reddit. The only conversations I've had about r/jailbait are in the context of making fun of you guys for trolling for pics of underage boys from there, or making fun of ugly liberal women for hating 17 year old girls. Nice try though. You should be IP banned from Reddit for making up shit like this.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:48 PM
1

Projecting and desperation typically make me laugh, but you should watch posting nonsense like this. Reported.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:25 PM
2

No, I'm saying that's your dad.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 09:06 PM
-1

Ann, that picture is too kind. You just know the women over there are hideous goblins.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 09:02 PM
3

I think this is from your personal camera, that pink superman shirt screams SRS.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:59 PM
7

The fewer distractions from the toddlers of SRS the better.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:12 PM
1

Just being a student of history, it's a little astonishing to think about how paternity tests change things for modern men. From the dawn of history to the present, females have been able to cuckold their husbands, duping men into raising children that were not theirs. This era is ending for the first time in human history, as men are beginning to have cheap and readily available resources to provide a check for this sort of behavior by women. For us guys, anyone who has sons, or anyone who just…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 04:25 PM
1

Dude go sit in their chat. SRS is a bunch of crusty forever alone gamer neckbeards pissed because their shitty liberal arts degrees leave them stuck in mom's basement. Of course there's the sweaty hogs mad no one will touch then as well. They all just gather and wallow in their loserdom together.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 06:31 PM
2

we'd be a lot better served by a study that focused on more salient facts than caregiver gender in attempting to identify children at-risk. What miffs many MRA's is that while the "woman victim/man perpetrator" paradigm is continually reinforced in the media and pop culture, the actual reality is that most child abuse and parental murder of children is perpetrated by women. This simply doesn't make sense. When these statistics are posted, the first response by many is to redirect the conversatio…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 04:28 PM
7

I like that the mods here are banning openly with an explanation. At least no one can run and cry "Oh, I made 'x' point and embarrassed them, then they banned me with no explanation".
/r/MensRights05/11/11 01:17 AM
3

That's a huge assumption. For me, the more I do something, the better and more relaxed I become at it. Whether it's parenting, learning a new language, writing music, working on an engineering problem, etc. I am probably weird in that while I do occasionally get frustrated with my kids (ages 4 and 15), I never feel like I'm about to snap. I honestly think there is no great mystery to parenting; it's part art, part science. Hard work, flexibility and the ability to learn from mistakes have been k…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 01:07 AM
2

Why wouldn't caretaker time be a factor? It gives both vastly more opportunity, and increases caretaker stress. Violence does not always happen in a vacuum. Something happens that acts like a trigger, a sink gets overflowed, a glass gets broken in the kitchen and spills juice all over the floor, a child dirties their underwear after constant reminders to go to the bathroom, a child won't stop crying...the parent flips It could be argued, that a parent who had the child 80%-90% of the time, might…
/r/MensRights04/11/11 10:40 PM
2

Perpetrator Relationships to Child Fatalities
/r/MensRights04/11/11 10:27 PM
2

I have done some reading on Andrea Yates and Susan Smith and similar women-- they were not typical abusers who simply lost their temper and smacked their kid. They were full on psychotic. As opposed to the healthy, well adjusted mothers who murder their children? We as a society are reluctant to acknowledge that the majority of child abuse and parental murder of children is committed by women. We reserve untold tax dollars for billboards, radio ads and local programs to discourage men from commi…
/r/MensRights04/11/11 09:51 PM
8

I wasn't saying that there was a simple proportional relationship. OK, no problem. Many people think by throwing out there that women have more parenting time, the numbers showing women commit most child abuse and parental murder are somehow meaningless. We tend to not want to accept that women beat their kids or drown them in lakes and bathtubs. These statistics can be valuable in educating the white knights and "women firsters" who hold on to outdated ideals and harmful stereotypes.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 06:16 PM
0

Most children are primarily cared for by women. Someone who has a child 27-28 days out of the month versus 3-4 might by virtue of time also have better developed parenting skillsets, support systems and tools for dealing with child related stress (i.e. triggers for violence). This likely isn't a simple proportional relationship.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 06:04 PM
9

"It doesn't cost fifty thousand dollars a month to buy fruit loops" - Bill Burr
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:26 PM
4

Once he decided to lawyer up and explore options, he was advised to delete the thread and not speak about the issue again publicly.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:13 AM
37

They both sound like idiots... I have no problem with this guy's response. Personally when feminists yammer about the door thing, I look at them with a smirk and quickly say "I didn't hold the door because you're a lady, I did it because I'm a gentleman". Funny to watch their self esteem drop a few points.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:15 AM
4

But women couldn't vote 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:21 PM
7

So instead of fights for men's rights, or whining about how women are treated differently, or whining about feminism, why not campaign for a society in which "What is a man?" need not matter. This is a juvenile assessment of what men's rights is about.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 02:41 AM
6

Hugo Schwyzer is talking about men being adolescents, yet he's been married 4 times and fucks his community college students.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 03:27 PM
2

I've been saying this for years, most modern young women on college campuses think feminism is a joke and not their issue. Since they have lost the youth, now the challenge is to drag the entrenched system populated with older feminists, kicking and screaming into the 21st century.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 03:20 PM
4

In all seriousness, you're one of the dumbest posters I've seen on here in a while. If you are trying to use use sarcasm, you are failing. If you are trying to troll as a pretend feminist, you are failing. If you are being serious, it's even worse.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 02:33 PM
1

Violence often happens due to a trigger. Parenting stress, childrearing skillsets developed over time and systems in place in the home are integral components of the issue. To ignore their impact as a whole in would be ill-advised, as they all inter-related. I guess some people simply see what they want to see, then move on.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:18 PM
6

I see this as valuable, but not changing a whole lot. Other than internet started relationships, which is just asking for trouble, it's largely a myth that women out of the blue discover that a guy is an abusive asshole. In my life experience, they usually know what they're getting into from day one, but love the idea of being a victim and the center of attention for their friends so much, that it's an acceptable trade off.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:07 PM
1

Are you taking into account that this is not a simple proportional relationship; that mothers who have 27 days out of the month, by virtue of time may have better developed parenting skillsets, stress coping mechanisms, rules in the home and support systems to avoid triggers for violence? To be thoughtful, this is not a simple apples to apples comparison.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:01 PM
9

If she really believes women are stronger... If women really believed this, they wouldn't have to bombard the world with 1,000 pop songs a day about how they are strong and independent, yet sensitive and vulnerable. It's sort of like Stuart Smalley staring in a mirror and making daily affirmations, on a global scale.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 12:53 PM
2

I did not make any statement about child related stress, by the way - that is your own addition to the argument. This may be a fundamental part of the argument. It's likely violence doesn't happen in a vacuum, anger often needs a trigger; a glass breaks and spills in the kitchen, a child won't stop crying and go to sleep, the dog bites a child who is taunting it. Someone with 90% of the parenting time with the kids, might find it easier to deal with these issues for myriad reasons. I don't have …
/r/MensRights26/10/11 12:47 PM
7

I've had statistics and that isn't a citation. One could argue that a parent who had a child more often might have more developed parenting skillsets and coping mechanisms for dealing with child related stress. You don't have kids and your previous statement sounds like a generalization. I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm asking for the back up.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 02:00 AM
-2

But the likelihood of a parent reaching a breaking point when a child is around is increased when spending more time with a child. [Citation needed]
/r/MensRights26/10/11 12:33 AM
6

Keep in mind this is her truth. She could have easily gotten double herpes from her "sexual liberation" and then stayed off the cock out of shame for five years until she got a Valtrex scrip.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:31 PM
-2

Look, liberals tell me that feminism does not hurt men or children and is not anti-family. People who think that are paranoid crazy cis white guys trying to hold on to male privilege. Therefore, this blog does not exist on the internet.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:14 PM
2

You should link debunkings of various feminist false claims. This. Much like the Chicago feminist blogger from a few days ago, many people have no idea that MRA's exist, or that there is even a counterpoint to the raging fire hose of feminist disinformation spewed out on a daily basis. A single link to "Common feminist canards" in the sidebar would be fine.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:15 PM
2

Speak to your average conservative about areas where feminism is negatively affecting your sons and you will likely get some traction in the conversation. Speak to your average liberal about the same things and depending on the issue, they will either laugh in your face, or become red faced, pounding on the table about patriarchy and women not being able to vote 150 years ago. Liberalism is the problem. It is self absorbed hate wrapped up in a nice shiny package of good intentions. It is like th…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:08 PM
1

Liberals are 90% of the problem. Their core values prevent them addressing men's issues in any meaningful way. The few liberal MRA's there are, are really just people who've politically painted themselves into a corner over a number of years, they are so "dug in" they would rather live with the cognitive dissonance of not being able to reconcile their beliefs than be an integrated person.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 09:55 PM
5

Growing up the in the indie rock scene and having played in bands for years, one thing always killed me. The women in this scene would bitch about patriarchy, misogyny and gay bashing, then jump in their Volkswagen Bug paid for by daddy and bump 50 cent or Lil' John.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 03:48 PM
8

What difference does it make? The account is effectively disabled. Hiding behind doublespeak, ambiguous rules and nuance is cowardly. Just admit you guys have a point of view that you want to prevail on the men's rights page. Everyone knows this. It's plain as day, you guys aren't fooling anybody.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 03:42 PM
7

Michael Flood is a lapdog for feminists and a disgrace to his own gender. Placing his content on the men's rights page is like having Archie Bunker write the page on feminism. Wikipedia is getting seriously fucking stupid with this and they seriously need to re-think what they are doing.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 03:38 PM
-2

You're getting manboobz' panties in a wad. Keep it up.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 08:49 PM
2

Well, women certainly aren't born at 1,200 lbs then slim down to 120 lbs in adulthood. If the picture is supposed to be making a statement, it isn't working.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 05:28 PM
2

I would rather see the Men's Rights page disappear from Wikipedia altogether than have it neutered by a bunch of laughable dullards hiding a POV agenda behind a thin veil of "Wikipedia policy". Let's cut to the chase, some people just can't stand to see Men's Rights issues articulated clearly in an easy to understand fashion. Though these administrators probably feel good about themselves for allowing the defacing of the men's rights page, they will eventually be judged on the wrong side of hist…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 05:20 PM
5

She just seems like a dumb, naive woman. I thank God the MRA movement is picking up steam, but this whole thing seems overblown.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 03:27 PM
-4

I think the woman one is backwards.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:45 PM
3

Feminists never wanted equality, they wanted special rights and privileges. They wanted to cherry pick equality when and where it suited them, but keep the traditional benefits of being a woman and twist their hair into pigtails when that suited them better. Most MRA's aren't looking to define themselves in any way based on early feminism.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:57 PM
1

Nice appeal to authority, doesn't change the fact that you are wrong to call this kids' feelings baseless. If the circumstances were altered slightly (one night stand) or if he broke up with her and she became vindictive, things could get ugly quickly.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:53 PM
2

They have 23 readers?
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:11 PM
14

If his girlfriend were surrounded by liberal women who love to cultivate a culture of rape, who tried to convince her that drunken or drugged sex is by default sex without consent, it isn't unusual to think that this combined with an argument could lead to a rape accusation. Your post is snarky and naive.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 04:01 PM
2

Women will yammer about things like this all day, but when the unemployed drummer of the local metal band hits on them, all bets are off.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 09:21 PM
2

Holy shit, are there really guys who read this sub-Reddit just to cry about it on their blogs?
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:08 PM
4

Bars usually keep out younger guys, because they traditionally (from about 18-20) act like it's the first time they've ever been in a bar, every single time they go out. They spend less money and are there to be loud and start fights.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:00 PM
0

Just because Hitler, Stalin and Saddam were raised by single mothers, that doesn't mean they are bad at raising kids.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 12:29 PM
1

26,000 readers, 30 votes sounds like a pretty representative sample.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 02:36 AM
1

As far as I remember, the contest for the symbol to be used was vote based. The initial decision to have the focus was not. Either way, not really worth arguing about.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 12:22 AM
12

If one wants to see a matriarchal society, look at the inner city. It's working out pretty well, there's no violence at all.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:36 PM
7

I'd rather not see the white knight verbiage added. Disagree, the "women firsters", while a quickly dying breed on the conservative side, have hurt men in clearly definable ways, especially in family courts. Women have fought for the right to be treated like men for 40 years, let them have it.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:33 PM
-1

Clutch.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 03:02 PM
5

straight, white, cisgendered male. I love how they say this as if it's some slur. "You belong to a very successful social group, you motherfucker". It's really just a transparent attempt to paint us as lower on the social ladder to cover up their pervasive feelings of insecurity and inadequacy. It's like a drunk mega whore at a party calling the popular girl a slut. Everybody sees it for what it is, only the sad drunk whore and her friends feel like they accomplished anything, the majority of pe…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 02:38 PM
-3

While Bill has some points here, it's sort of odd watching a left wing idealogue, complain about societal problems brought about by left wing idealogues. It would be like hearing Rush Limbaugh complain about tax cuts, there's a tiny "WTF?" factor.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 01:57 PM
2

We're all straight white cis males when it's time for the two-minute hate. The funny part is, when any of that hate gets reflected back at them from people who would otherwise support their cause but are sick of their irrationality and dramatic lies, they flip out like spider monkeys on crack and howl about people hating them. There is a reason a lot of people hate sub-Reddits like theirs and it has nothing to do with their sexuality. It has to do with them being obnoxious idiots (who are often …
/r/MensRights04/10/11 12:33 PM
0

This was more the whim of mods and less (i.e., not at all) the collective desire of the community.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 02:19 AM
4

Saw this steaming shit train coming from a mile away. Those of us who have been around the cause for a few years have seen this movie before and it always ends the same way. A waste of time, myriad distractions and people at the end of the day that are still going to foam at the mouth over "straight white cis men" and the MRA platform.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 02:16 AM
3

Are gingers and buck-toothed people prevented from marrying, or bullied until they commit suicide, or gang raped out of hate for their differences? Until they are, Fuck you and your idiotic comment. Well... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_hair a family in Newcastle upon Tyne, England, was forced to move twice after being targeted for abuse and hate crime on account of their red hair;[57] and in 2003, a 20 year old was stabbed in the back for "being ginger".[58] In May 2009, a British schoolboy …
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:04 PM
2

Then, mainstream feminism came into the picture and told the African American woman that she didn’t need her African American man in her life at all. Holy fuck I've been saying this for ages.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:36 PM
-1

Firstly, I have no desire to rehash it either. I will say, that people have a finite amount of time and attention to give to the issues. If 25% of it is spent arguing over logos and issues that affect a disproportionately small subset of people that will never care about MRA issues in general, that is a distraction.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:23 PM
-6

If we want equal rights for men, we need to realize that it is a fight for equal rights for all men, not just a subset of men. No one is saying that lesbians and gay people shouldn't have rights. It is a simple question of focus and priorities. Expecting the LGBT crowd to be on board with MRA issues is like expecting Al Gore's followers to get on board with coal, it is a pipe dream not based in reality. The active hatred purveyed against typical MRA issues amongst this crowd is institutionalized…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:14 PM
2

It's pretty naive, but some people believe that if we direct some of our attention to other sub-Reddits' issues, they will like us.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:44 PM
2

Liberals are perfectly happy for your kids to get burned alive, as long as some 100 lb woman can feel better about herself and ride on a fire truck.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:38 PM
-5

Yeah, their ideology is part of the problem, but they are son invested in it they can't give it up. Stockholm Syndrome...
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:22 PM
0

Holy fuck this is sick. A child is going to want to please his parents. If he is constantly rewarded for identifying as a girl and treated with indifference for identifying as a male, this shit isn't rocket science. If anyone needs any further proof that liberals are sick people, read up on David Reimer's story. Stopping puberty with hormone therapy on a little boy? This shit should be a choice after 18 years of age, not on the middle of critical development.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:39 PM
0

Exactly. There is a finite amount of time available to all us to read and comment. There is also a finite amount of front page space for men's issues. This was a dumb idea that smacks of appeasement and it never works, this experiment has been tried ad nasuem on the internet over the last 15 years. It fails and/or backfires every time. The only problem I see, is trying to make the mods look completely stupid for honestly believing this was a good idea isn't productive, either. The community isn'…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:12 PM
6

Why do anarchist Reddits have mods? Holy fuck the irony.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 05:48 PM
3

Michael Flood is a nut. With him being a male, his anti-MRA pro-feminist work is like a black guy defending the KKK. It's so ridiculous, one has to wonder if he doesn't suffer from some sort of mental illness.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 01:21 PM
2

She seems like the type of chick who was raped at a young age and developed a seething hatred for men, culminating in being a lesbian in adulthood. Seen it a thousand times, the way the anger and disdain waft from her page, you can tell deep down she's yearning for some form of male acceptance.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 01:16 PM
1

Mainstream Christianity is even facilitating "Eat Pray Love" divorces and the notion that "if she's unhappy it's his fault." Mainstream Christianity does not facilitate the notion that women should initiate a divorce and leave their family to fuck their way across Europe because they are bored. That's a liberal idea if I've ever heard one. Note: A traditionalist conservative doesn't have to be a Christian.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:24 PM
-1

That doesn't matter, awareness will make them like us.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:29 PM
2

I'll give you this, liberal feminists did do a great job telling traditional conservative stay at home mothers they were useless and that they could work 50 hours a week at a high pressure career job and still raise healthy kids with no stress and no problems. Funny how many people have seen through that lie. Either way, it wasn't traditional family oriented conservatives who pushed for their men to be nancy emotional cripples, that was your liberal Alan Alda types who pushed the narrative that …
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:05 PM
1

While it purports to want to roll back feminist policy it does so by disenfranchising woman rather than building up men, keeping both genders pushed into the ground together. Also many republicans are traditionalist, which is a system that clearly discriminates against women and is harmful to the MRM. Most modern conservatives are well versed in the adverse affects of liberal feminism in the US. Understanding this doesn't mean they want to push genders to the ground, that is silly and has no bas…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:47 PM
-1

but why then is it just the feminist men? don't feminist women also enable women to be mad at men? Feminist men and feminist women = feminist liberals. It certainly wasn't the idea of any traditionalist conservatives to turn men into weak passive-aggressive blubbering emotional manginas.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:54 PM
0

That is a false choice. Refusing to play nice and beg for equality doesn't mean sounding like the KKK.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:37 PM
5

is a really shitty way to make progress. If you want political action, you need other people to agree with you. There's something to be said for having a determined political conviction and not waffling in the wind to please others. Dick Cheney's "So" comment comes to mind. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SypeZjeOrY4 I don't believe in begging and asking nicely for equality. Some people need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. I fully realize I may be extreme, but that's fi…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:00 PM
3

Liberals in America actively fight against men's rights issues. Doesn't matter if I'm condescending, I'm right. People such as yourself are statistical outliers in the US and are not relevant to the political ideology argument. I would like to see a lot of the same things, I would simply like to see monies currently heaved into the bottomless pit of gender biased social programs (i.e., VAWA) re-apportioned in a non-discriminatory fashion. Taxes are high enough and liberals at large are a roadblo…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:43 PM
-3

MRA's have bigger fish to fry, no sense in worrying what liberal koo koos think about them. As a whole, they are going to hate MRA's no matter what. Focus...
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:58 PM
-2

I think what happens is, some people grow up and self identify as liberal for myriad reasons. Then they have an epiphany or personal experience that causes them to reach out and learn about men's issues. However, they are so ingrained to that particular ideology, that even though it isn't in the best interests of their new outlook, they can't let go of the political corner they have painted themselves into. Hence, the Stockholm Syndrome and desire to please liberals and just get them to understa…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:52 PM
0

Feminist men are like "Duckie" from Pretty in Pink. Emasculated men who believe that being "not like those other men" will get them female attention, in their inner circle and ultimately sex. What they are really doing, is just being extremely emotionally manipulative in an effort in a get what they want.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:39 PM
0

I agree. While I support equality across the board, this is pandering.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:20 PM
-4

Liberals are responsible for most of feminism to date. This. MRA's who identify as liberal are showing symptoms of Stockholm Syndrome. Ninety-five percent of those who are dismissive of and seek to disrupt meaningful dialogue on men's issues are liberals. At least with conservatives, you have a chance at a discussion.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:18 PM
1

Yea, he's way too invested in the issue. It's almost like a MRA stole his girlfriend and banged her right in front of him. In fact, I wouldn't doubt it if he was a 130 lb weakling estrogen bomb whose little love ran off with a traditional guy. His posts are screaming "inadequacy".
/r/MensRights27/09/11 07:31 PM
2

The James_from_Cambridge guy sounds like he got butt raped in a dark alley by an MRA. He is exuding a serious amalgam of anger, stupidity and ignorance that is pretty funny.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:52 PM
2

Please, it's not like women do push ups from their knees.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:20 PM
-2

Wishful thinking. Social research shows conservatives (typical MRA's) are happier and have more fulfilled sex lives than liberals (typical MRA antagonists). The angry, forever alone is more likely to be a feminist, I mean, unless you don't believe in science.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:16 PM
7

Maybe he has daddy issues. In order to be a male feminist (in feminism's current context) one would have to hate himself and his gender on some fundamental level. Perhaps his dad spanked him and he now views testosterone as poison and evil.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 08:22 PM
4

Hugo Schwyzer is on his fourth marriage. I've always said that while feminists encourage men to be whiny bitches, that isn't ultimately what keeps their panties wet.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 08:08 PM
3

This is a trap. While feminists say this, they are the first to yell "Pussy!" when somebody like John Boehner drops a tear. What they really want, is for men to be more emotionally dependent and weak, therefore less threatening and easier to manipulate.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:25 PM
1

There were women writing love letters and lining up to marry Ted Bundy and Richard Ramirez. Says a lot...
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:06 PM
4

As much as we talk about rape as a society, you would think every woman in America gets raped every day.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:01 PM
7

If a man works too hard to pay the bills and is gone a lot, he is an asshole who isn't paying attention to her emotional needs. If he doesn't work enough and make money, he is an asshole who doesn't take care of his family. Clearly, the way to be a proper family man, is to work 20 hours a week and make 100k a year.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 01:59 PM
0

Is there a sub-Reddit for progressive alt-right MRA's that openly have no desire to play nice and beg for acceptance? That's what I need.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:43 PM
2

That was particularly vomitous.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 05:46 PM
3

I think part of the problem here is terminology. The word "rape" has a traditional connotation and it's generally not this type of situation. I think since the minor would be obligated to pay child support in the event of her pregnancy, attempted financial rape works for me. I would just love to hear that on the evening news, "Woman arrested for attempting to financially rape a young boy and his family Saturday night".
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:56 PM
1

When the Demos took over congress in 2006, they ushered in an anti-business climate. They proceeded to vilify the economic engines of our country for next five years, threatening them with new taxes and policies that caused them to not spend capital, cancel or delay expansion plans and to slow hiring.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:27 PM
1

It's critical to the point, because it exemplifies how liberals like to talk about helping people to make themselves feel better, but that's about as far as it goes. They really just want to publicly pat themselves on the back for what good people they are. The way to help people is not to vilify business, stunt economic growth and kill the economy so the poor can't find jobs. Empty words don't fill up peoples bank accounts.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:18 PM
0

The poor are doing pretty well under the stooge you guys elected in 2008.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:05 PM
0

liberallllllllllllls ...are subhuman people.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:00 PM
2

Clearly, this is the fault of the patriarchy. Sincerely, ShitRedditSays
/r/MensRights20/09/11 03:44 PM
1

It isn't about the patriarchy, it's about well meaning but misguided liberals. You are part of the problem, not the solution. People like you make the world a worse place.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 03:41 PM
1

You believe you are making fun of sexists, but you are really trying to disrupt dialogue on equal rights for young men.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 03:12 PM
3

I checked out the SRS chat for a few and it was pretty funny to see their abortions of thought happening in real time. The general tone of the "conversations", was that of fat girlfriendless teenage guys who live at home, sitting at their computer surrounded by piles of empty Cheetos bags and coke bottles, making penis jokes in between World of Warcraft dungeon raids. These guys are way too dumb to be a threat to anyone here intellectually, but the semi-organized downvoting of valid posts is pro…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 02:41 PM
0

This is the same as, "Maybe we are sexists, but the real evil here is making a subreddit devoted to mocking/downvoting another." No it isn't. I'm saying your sub-Reddit is full of unfunny insecure idiots who can't make a point, so out of some misguided sense of self-righteousness they try to skew the discussion of people with a different view. don't care Because you are stupid. don't care Because you know, you aren't really doing anything and your ilk are feckless simpletons that want to pat the…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:18 AM
2

I think if you peel away the layers of the onion, a lot of males who self-identify as feminist (given the context it exists in today) do hate themselves on some fundamental level.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 10:03 PM
2

He understands this fully, but pushing the bar so high that it can never be proven to his acceptance, is a way to keep his head in the sand and avoid reconciling his political ideology with his MRA views.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 08:09 PM
-1

If you are raising boys and supporting a system which demonizes them, diminishes their rights, is openly happy with current inequalities in education and believes addressing their issues is "whining", then yes, you hate your own kids.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:18 PM
1

If you are poor and or disadvantaged, it is a factor. The solution is not to expect 30 million people to suddenly become rich and move to Hawaii and send their kids to private schools. It is to modernize and modify social programs so that they don't place married poor and disadvantaged couples at the proverbial back of the line, thereby incentivizing fatherless homes and recurring transient relationships.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 03:27 PM
0

I don't recall saying that was the only cause. I understand if you are raised by a rich mother and actively involved wealthy grandparents in Hawaii, go to all exclusive private schools and eventually Harvard, you can be an anomaly.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 03:16 PM
0

Ingatius Reilly, Loyola, New Orleans. Just stuck out. I have a friend that just finished Grad school there.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:49 PM
-2

I think the problem is you're trying to frame a social science argument around a political ideology first. I'm putting life experience, reality and social science first, politics second. We know what works, it does no child a service to pretend that the data doesn't matter. BTW, you aren't going to Loyola for a science degree are you?
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:41 PM
-2

Your view of physics is pretty limited to first year mathematics. Clearly you are being defensive. The best way to explain things is to learn to keep them simple. In particle physics, we require a 5 sigma deviation from expectation to establish something with certainty. Everything is doubtable before that. I don't hold social sciences to the same level, but I do expect them to understand the concept of "correlation is not causation". I'm glad you don't require a 0.00003% level of certainty out o…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:20 PM
-1

I believe that isn't going to happen anytime soon, they are different animals. In Physics, one can resolve a vector and essentially solve for "X", you get a pretty clear answer. In Economics, complex human behavior is commingled with massive amounts of variables such that one cannot simply come up with an equation that adequately takes all variables into account. This is where some social sciences and things Economics become an art. You can rarely have a 95% confidence level you are framing the …
/r/MensRights19/09/11 01:49 PM
-8

Correlation is not causation. There is no proof that non-nuclear families cause sexual violence against children. Social science is not Physics. It is more akin to Economics and can be an art as much as a science. You will likely no time soon have three peer reviewed studies and a Phd thesis going back to birth on each of a thousand different adolescents to say "OK, we got it, file it away". The fact is, if a woman purposely decides to be a single mother, the statistics show her child is at grea…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 01:30 PM
-12

I've often said that if you are raising boys and vote for candidates who support feminism, you hate your own kids. In other words, not only do many moderates not criticize them, they indirectly support them. Non-nuclear families don't cause sexual violence against children, and there is no evidence to support that claim. Perhaps. From the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/foundation/foundatione.cfm The Child Abuse and Father Absence Connect…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 01:14 PM
-6

Sorry, not buying the misogyny angle, stop crying over the guy. Exactly, then have you ever considered that shock horror gasp a large portion of those who frequent /r/MR agree that comments that SRS attack are indeed misogynistic and wrong? If this was the case, downvotes would happen at a sustained rate over time. As it is, you guys post, the trolling starts and it's easily identifiable because in a short time the downvotes through multiple accounts come in. You know that you do it, stop trying…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:36 AM
-6

Everything you posted is in the home Reddit for Men's Rights, idiot. The analogue would be for MRA's to have a sub-Reddit where all they do is post quotes they disagree with, circle jerk and spew downvotes through multiple accounts to skew and disrupt dialogue within another sub-Reddit. FYI, I've seen you do this before. It's quality of posting, not quantity hoss.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:29 AM
-5

Says the guy with the subreddit modded by a known misogynist. Known by who? You? Say, didn't Hitler celebrate Christmas in 1941? I guess everyone that celebrates Christmas is a Nazi and agrees with him, since they're associated. That's funny. No, that exactly what you do. Please, once you guys start circle jerking in your sub-Reddit, the downvote to actual comment ratio is ridiculous. There is no way a sub-Reddit with 10% of the readership of Men's Rights can derail a discussion with a flurry di…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:22 AM
-5

...has no qualms about spreading the MRM doctrine throughout Reddit with the click of a downvote arrow. The MRA doctrine is equality. What we do not do, is surreptitiously try to skew the internal discussion of other sub-Reddits and downvote valid points without comment because we are insecure. I understand you guys naively believe you are justified in this because you feel part of some self righteous quasi-religious crusade, so therefore it's OK to bend the rules and disrupt a community. The tr…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:02 AM
0

So guys, as users how do we protect our own sub Reddit? Clearly we have a small group of antagonists who use multiple accounts to skew discussion they don't like. In their insecurity, they target clear and cogent posts with helpful data and arguments and bury them so fellow MRA's may not see them. Should we take a page from their playbook to diminish their not so subtle influence on our dialogue?
/r/MensRights18/09/11 07:10 PM
5

ShitRedditSays is a relatively small sub-Reddit full of extreme lefties and feminists who re-post things they find, circle jerk over it with their own comments, then they swoop into other sub-Reddits like a butthurt brigade and downvote with multiple accounts to derail the discussion before the OP even knows what is going on. http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/ They make Reddit a worse place.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 02:55 PM
6

I can't believe I just noticed it. Men's Rights has 26,000 readers, SRS has 2,000. Yet, their posts, especially in here often end up with disproportionately more up/downvotes once they get involved. Either they have a shit ton of people that never post or frontpage their Reddit, or they use multiple accounts to skew discussion.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 01:27 PM
-3

Yawn
/r/MensRights18/09/11 07:59 AM
-5

Or maybe you didn't actually read....
/r/MensRights18/09/11 07:57 AM
-2

Prove me wrong. I mean, if what I said was so stupid, obviously a simple one sentence argument in lieu of downvotes would wish it all away, right?
/r/MensRights18/09/11 07:51 AM
-7

In New Orleans, the conservative people in my social circles are diverse and support multi-culturalism. Many speak multiple languages and are from countries around the world. I would imagine it would be a different experience in somewhere like Little Rock, Arkansas. Don't let a negative experience with the dinosaurs of the party define the GOP for you.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 09:55 PM
-4

I never understood fence riders, to each his own.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 09:31 PM
-8

Yes, not only are they all angry virgins, they are all secretly gay like Jim Mcgreevey too. Thanks for unwittingly proving my point.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 09:00 PM
-9

This has come up often in my 15 years of activism and the general consensus has almost always been that the left side of the aisle diminishes rights and resists progress, while the right at least offers some sort of hope even though they present issues of their own. If posting things from scientific american and pew research in response to onslaughts of laughable unfounded taunts and drive-by cowardly posts by other sub-Reddits offends you, I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 07:52 PM
-4

In situations like this, where the issues seem inexorably intertwined, it would be foolish to exclude the knowledge from the discussion.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 07:38 PM
-18

If you're talking in any way about the "go to" argument of MRA antagonists, it's simply a huge amount of projecting commingled with wishful thinking. Most MRA's self-identify as conservative while most of the antagonists self-identify as liberal. Social science has consistently shown that conservatives are happier and have better, more fulfilled sex lives than liberals. http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=BABCDEA5-D180-499B-094168CBE5442468 "Conservatives are happier than li…
/r/MensRights17/09/11 07:26 PM
1

By the way, for those that don't know, the Wall Street Journal is a right-wing newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch, the same dude who owns Fox News. I'm not getting in the middle of this one, but that is quite simply not a valid argument. Playing six degrees of Rupert Murdoch does not wish the facts away. The author is also a senior fellow at Stanford, a liberal school. In addition, your argument seems a little schizophrenic. Are you attempting to say that your source for different information on …
/r/MensRights15/09/11 10:19 PM
3

Hugo and Michael Flood both must have experienced some bizarre childhood trauma, those guys are batshit insane.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 10:11 PM
4

A lot of MRA's can be slightly dismissive of women's issues because we hear about them 24/7 on television, online, from everyone in government and disseminated through 500 women's studies programs across the country. There is a fair amount of solidarity amongst MRA's because the movement is just beginning to gain some traction. Perhaps it will splinter and grow, then we can have the luxury of splitting into factions and infighting.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 08:03 PM
7

Women stay at home because they love their kids and want the best for them, not because of some evil plot. You are conjuring oppression out of thin air. If a woman is capable of the clarity of thought and consistent logic required to become a judge or fighter pilot, she can decide how she wants to raise her children. Does gender conditioning exist? Of course, it's partly why we are here as a species. Saying that adults are helpless against is just silly.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 06:38 PM
6

I do get sharp pains when I read your posts.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 05:56 PM
9

Choices are made in a social context. Gendered conditioning starts young, and its a two way street, its the same reason men work in more risky occupations. Please don't deliberately miss the point here, it is literally not possible to dissociate the "choices" someone makes from what they have been told a man or a woman should be from day 1 You are still saying that women who choose to stay home and raise their kids are oppressed, which is nonsense. In addition, just because social gender conditi…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 05:49 PM
6

I think the group that makes up overwhelming majorities in centers of political, cultural, and economic power might be a privileged, rather than an oppressed group We can stop right here. You are essentially saying that if women make different choices than men, i.e. less demanding career, stay at home mom, desire to focus more on children and family, they are oppressed.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 05:33 PM
9

Well a lot of these feminists are "formed" in womens studies courses in colleges in the US. The key here, is to use the down economy to actively eliminate these taxpayer supported, dinosaur women's studies programs. They recently kept the department but downsized it and dropped the degree at my school. If anything remains, it should be a neutral gender studies department, with equal time given to competing arguments, instead of the echo chamber of biased misinformation that characterizes the typ…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 05:22 PM
2

Men's rights are human rights, because the explicit goals and desires are only equality for ourselves and our sons.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 05:04 PM
2

This is for MRA's to discuss, not the nutbars of ShitRedditSays or the lib-trolls. The men's rights movement is as vague and undefined as the feminist movement. The sad truth is that you're all a bunch of dumbasses. See above. Are the trolls from AMR and SRS here on Reddit pathological? Probably. I agree, dealing with the SRS crew isn't only like being hit with a dump truck of stupidity in every post, it's like there is something disturbing under the surface. The insecurity, self loathing, willf…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 04:57 PM
3

Honestly, the Republican "women firsters" who still believe that women are sanctified and the moral arbiters of society can be just as bad.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:49 AM
2

People will always discriminate based on looks, economic factors, etc. I don't believe in discriminating against people because of race, sexuality or the typical social factors. Let's be honest, you can't expect anyone to put the desire to be the perfect person above paying for baby formula.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:45 AM
2

I'm not defending the practice. I'm simply explaining that it is often human nature for people to put their families and children ahead of any desire to be the perfect person. You can feel good about yourself and be late on rent or unable to pay the electric bill, or you can do what you have to do to buy that school uniform.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:00 AM
4

Another rape liar bites the dust. Of course, the liberal nutters probably still feel sorry for her. The patriarchy probably made her do it.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 07:57 PM
4

I'm not defending the practice, I'm simply saying why it happens. If a bartender sees a back alley way to swap out two of ten seats at the bar for people who are more likely to tip a customary amount, it will often happen. "Hey, you mind giving the ladies a spot guys?" "Thanks, I'll toss you a beer on the house". Once again, not defending it, just explaining it. I have seen black bartenders do the same thing. I worked for a few years on Bourbon st. in school and NFL/NBA types were often the chea…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 06:10 PM
3

Bartenders make their money by reading people, then gauging how to divide up the finite amount of attention they can give to maximize their ROI, essentially. If you have small groups of people who routinely require a large amount of attention but tip $2 on $100 tabs, you are making less money to pay your electric bill, buy food for your children, etc. No amount of wanting to be a good person is going to trump the economic reality of wanting to take care of your family.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 05:49 PM
3

The policy could easily be rooted in the bartenders wanting to make tips to pay their bills. The man/woman issue could be a ruse to cover for that.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:35 PM
3

Sometimes, I can't help but think the radical leftists hate straight white males because at least some secretly want to be one. Reminds me of kids in high school who will bitch about the quarterback or head cheerleader, but are really just insecure and secretly want to be them.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:59 PM
1

Heresy you speak.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 02:44 PM
5

To your average liberal feminist, it doesn't matter that it's a lie. That's because touting this lie for years isn't simply based in willful ignorance, but rather good intentions and the notion that if you repeat a lie enough, people will eventually believe it. It's perverse thinking not rooted in any real logic, but then again we're talking about people who genuinely believe today's women are still cowering under oppression and are chained to the stove in a scene straight out of the 1950's.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 12:40 PM
8

Jamie Foster did fall off the back. http://www.lafire.com/lastalarm_file/2004-0814_Foster/JaimeFoster.htm "Firefighter Jamie L. Foster, 25, was the first probationary member and the first woman to die in the Line-of-Duty on the Los Angeles Fire Department. As the engine backed, Foster fell from the tailboard." Still, this may not be the one I'm thinking of.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 08:08 PM
2

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/FIREFIGHTER'S+DEATH+ACCIDENTAL+JAIME+FOSTER,+25,+WAS+1ST+LAFD+FEMALE...-a0134550347">FIREFIGHTER'S DEATH ACCIDENTAL JAIME FOSTER, 25, WAS 1ST LAFD FEMALE TO DIE IN LINE OF DUTY. "The death of the Los Angeles rookie firefighter who fell off the back of a hook-and-ladder truck last year was accidental, according to a final department report released Tuesday. The conclusion backs up preliminary findings late last year into the death of Jaime Foster, 25, the first femal…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 07:51 PM
7

http://articles.sfgate.com/2003-01-15/bay-area/17471596_1_female-firefighter-san-francisco-fire-department-fire-engine "The San Francisco firefighter who fell off a fire engine during an emergency call died Monday night, five days after the accident. Melinda Ohler, 40, died at San Francisco General Hospital, where she had undergone operations to treat head injuries she suffered as her fire company responded Jan. 8 to an alarm at San Francisco International Airport." This is one from 2003.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 07:45 PM
1

Sorry, yes. I meant others were being dismissive of your opinion (ie, onslaught of ignorance thrown your way), which I believe through personal experience to have merit.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 06:40 PM
11

Women are keen to assert all of the benefits that modern society affords them, but at the same time quick to twist their hair into pigtails and play the "I'm just a girl" defense when the traditional benefits of being a woman would suit them better. It's a form of cherry picked equality that allows them, sometimes literally (Mary Winkler), to get away with murder.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 04:23 PM
1

I see you've been hit with a tidal wave of willful ignorance on this issue. I have been on several of the largest projects of their type ever attempted by the US Army Corps of Engineers. I have also worked on large hospitals, casinos and hotels. What you are talking about happens in plain sight, I have seen it on multiple projects. Think about it from his perspective, what motivation would he have in admitting any advantage? It's likely in his own selfish personal interest to obfuscate or minimi…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:17 PM
9

I remember a somewhat similar situation in California some years ago. The women eventually fell off the back of the fire truck leaving the station and died. She apparently didn't have the upper body strength to hold on. It's sad when people deny reality.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:56 PM
0

I have been on over a Billion dollars of USACE projects and have specifically seen black engineers given jobs to fill a quota/please the government. In several cases there were better qualified non-minority applicants who were clearly passed up, so that a guy who showed up late every single day, surfed facebook at his desk and fell asleep on the job could get paid. Am I saying black engineers have it easy? No, they get a LOT of grief behind their backs when they work in the field. However, in th…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter