TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mindwalker94 Archive

View 4 posts and 15 comments by mindwalker94 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"Call it censorship if you like: Reddit is a private entity and can make its own decisions about what you post there, in much the same way Facebook and Twitter can." The two preceding paragraphs: "But if Reddit--which has never turned a profit—hopes to play in the big leagues, they’ll need to play by the big league’s rules. Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and other social media sites have rules in place to prevent hate groups, and Reddit can do the same. Precedent comes in last summer’s ban of /r/n**…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 11:36 PM
1

Holy fuck, I just used the similar analogy on Facebook of trading a beat up pickup for a Ferrari. It really is a good comparison.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 04:25 PM
1

Can I get a source on that? I'd love to be able to refer to it.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:48 PM
40

I remember reading this a few years ago and being told while discussing it that it was wrong and misogynistic. If only I'd ignored that, I could've been far ahead of where I am now.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 12:36 AM
1

Basically, make it evident that you are desired by other women. This will plant the idea that she could lose you if she doesn't step up her game, which will make her step up her game.
/r/askTRP26/04/14 10:22 PM
3

I'm gonna have to steal this.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 11:23 AM
1

Can you link me that article please?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 11:22 PM
1

I'm just commenting so I can refer back to your brilliant explanation in the future.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 01:32 AM
1

Oh, buddy, I understand that, you don't have to convince me. What I mean is I'm explaining the hypergamous nature of women and just getting a "nuh-uh, that's not true" in response. It would help if I didn't just have both us arguing with no evidence to support either of us.
/r/askTRP30/03/14 09:18 PM
1

On and off for 3 years. Split up for a year before getting back together 5 months ago. I don't plan on force feeding her the red pill, but just sort of slowly reclaiming control until it's just accepted and understood that I am the captain.
/r/askTRP05/02/14 07:38 PM
1

I really appreciate all the responses, but yours I think has been the most helpful in giving me actual steps to take to ease her as well as myself into this new lifestyle. It's only been one day, and we were arguing through text(she's afraid of arguing with me face to face), but it seems to be effective. She made the implication that she was happier before we got together("we got along so much better when we were just friends and there wasn't all these expectations"), so I told her to go ahead a…
/r/askTRP05/02/14 05:04 PM
0

If there is still a movement for equality of any kind in the world, I think it's activists should just be known as equalists or something. That way it's clear that equality is the ultimate goal, without any bias towards a particular group, and it applies to all societal issues, not just gender rights. The people who commented about that feminism is still relevant in underdeveloped nations do have a point, I didn't take that into account, but like I stated above, a think Equalism would be a bette…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:04 AM
0

While there is inequality in any place, yes, I completely agree. One who supports the idea that everyone is equal should be known as something like an 'equalist' or 'equal rights activist', until we reach that ideal point where it is universally accepted that everyone is equal, and then there should be no need for any label.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:56 AM
6

I make no claims to be an MRA. I am a humanist. Equal rights for men where women currently hold power is something I support, but labeling myself an MRA is just as gender-biased as labeling myself a feminist. I seek true equality, not an eternal shifting of power from men to women and back. And I seek equality in all areas, not just gender.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:38 PM
4

Why call yourself a feminist then? The name itself implies female favoritism and bias. If you're all about gender-neutral equality, call yourself a humanist or something, and claim to advocate equal rights for all humans regardless of any creed/race/gender/religion/sexuality/etc.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter