TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ministerofinteriors Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by ministerofinteriors on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

What you mean is that there's a huge market. I agree. But there isn't funding for research.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 10:39 PM
-1

I think you're fundamentally missing the math here. The physical risk of pregnancy to men is 0. The physical risk of pregnancy to women, even if it's terminated, even with a morning after pill, is greater than 0. Men suffer no physical risks from pregnancy whatsoever, because they can't become pregnant. Men are in a greatly disadvantaged position when it comes to having the ability to decide whether or not they would like to be a parent. But there are no physical risks like there are for women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 07:29 AM
12

I don't think there's any question that male birth control is a more complex problem to solve, but there's also next to no funding. There are illnesses that impact fewer than 1 in 1 million that have significantly more research funding than male birth control.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 05:31 AM
5

This is not an accurate way of saying what I think you're trying to say. Men have none of the options women have when it comes to mitigating the risks of sex, women have many (birth control, abortion, legal abandonment, adoption (which only technically requires a father's approval, but there are many ways around that because of lax notification requirements)). Men have no options to choose whether they want to be parents other than abstinence and condoms. Women's risks however are much greater b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 05:29 AM
27

The rate of adverse side effects was 10x what is typical for female birth control. That's why the study was ended. It's been widely misreported that the side effects were the same as for women on birth control. This is partly true in that many of the specifics were similar, but the rates were 10x.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 05:25 AM
14

He also said that adults could have positive sexual relationships with children, among a million other non-child related idiotic things. He's a shallow quasi-socialist idiot who rants on twitch, not a worthwhile public intellectual.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 05:02 AM
2

Why would anyone care what this creep thinks? Edit: If this sub is in support of someone as clownish as Vaush, I'm out, enjoy yourselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 01:11 AM
21

I half hate this view. It's both true and not true. I think that men who want to be vulnerable are prevented from doing so in a lot of contexts. I don't think that men all want to be vulnerable in the same way women often are. I think even in a perfect world, men would likely remain more 'stoic' on average about many things. I think it's easy to muddy the waters on this topic, but I think that men and women are likely to express emotion or feel emotional about things differently on average just …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/22 06:43 AM
9

I would be careful about projecting the views of a subreddit, or any online forum onto all women. These are niche by definition and do not have a reasonable cross section of women. I do think that Gen Z and millennial women are more disdainful of men on average than other age groups, and I think it's a bigger problem than it has been in the past, but I don't think it's all or most women that feel this way nonetheless. I think it's specifically younger women on the left, and still not all of them…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/22 06:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter