TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mintylove Archive

View 0 posts and 665 comments by mintylove on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Of course there are in several big European countries, as well as Canada if I'm not mistaken.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 03:07 AM
1

You're trolling. Which gender represents the majority of law enforcement?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 09:27 PM
1

"They aren't "protecting" women against anything that would be there if men vanished." is a part of your comment. Men currently protect women from something (emotional abuse/physical abuse in woman/woman relationships) that would still exist if there were no men around. Are you being obtuse on purpose?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 09:09 PM
1

Do you think people don't need protection from emotional abusers? Who is going to enforce laws against emotional abuse if there were no men around?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 08:14 PM
–

What do you imagine someone with BPD is like?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 11:59 AM
2

Why are you focusing solely on violent crime? Emotional abuse is pretty evenly distributed between the genders. Also - "In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ Bad people are bad regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 08:53 AM
2

there is nothing else to experience thats gonna change anything. Not taking the most androgenic substance commonly available might have made a difference though lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 12:32 PM
3

I'm not claiming PEA has any effect on libido, nor that it's concentration is decreased in the honeymoon period, or anything really. It is on you to show evidence for you initial comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 09:24 AM
3

Both, the second one more so, seeing that phenethylamine is a monoamine and we know that MAOIs lower libido rather than increase it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 09:13 AM
2

Repeating the original comment doesn't make the claim any more true
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 09:05 AM
0

Once women aren't receiving PEA anymore their higher libido and spontaneous desire usually dissipates. This sounds like an unsubstantiated claim
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 06:57 AM
2

Don't project your cucked by a taller guy fantasy on me please
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 04:40 PM
2

It's not the single study showing a weak association. Another one I remember reading even showed a weak negative effect in a group of college students as the most successful ones were bulky 5'8 dudes who were the ones most aggressively approaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 08:34 AM
2

I couldn't give less fuck what tall guys say
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 08:30 AM
2

The strongest associations with the mating domain were seen in terms of body masculinity (r = .133, 95% CI: [0.091, 0.176], q = .001; Figure 3), voice pitch (r = .132, 95% CI: [0.061, 0.204], q = .002; Figure 4), and testosterone levels (r = .093, 95% CI: [0.066, 0.121], q = .001; Figure 5). Height showed a significant but smaller effect size (r = .057, 95% CI: [0.027, 0.087], q = .002; Figure 6). https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.06.980896v4.full
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 09:38 PM
5

90% of attractiveness for men boils down to both facial aesthetics and height. Facial aesthetics are notoriously hard to quantify, resulting in wildly heterogeneous findings and height has a marginal effect on male sexual success. Most lookism points are bs
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 07:37 PM
2

Guess what training your upper body and losing fat in the mid section leads to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 07:30 PM
2

Going to the gym isn't going to get u girls. This is provable bs. Shoulder-to-waist ratio has a bigger effect size on male attractiveness than heightm
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 04:24 PM
1

The issue here though is ALL super models that are married are married to men in high paying careers that earn equal to or more than them. Eh, Lima dated a Turkish motivational speaker conman
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 04:18 PM
2

I looked up some stats and it appears that Serbia, Slovenia and Croatia are surprisingly tolerant when it comes to interracial relationships, in contrast to Romania, Bulgaria and Macedonia, so you might have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 05:43 PM
0

And Muggsy Bogues was a 5'3 NBA player. Also, did you date them in the US or in their home countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:12 AM
5

Southeast Europe Ah yes, the most traditionalist region in Europe, where countries are 95+% racially homogeneous.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:47 AM
1

At least half this sub is probably completely opposed to the thought that a slightly leaner face gets you more pussy than being neurotypical Yes, because it's asinine
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 12:45 AM
–

And yet, most data points to height having almost no effect on both sexual and reproductive success.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 12:48 AM
1

You can't pay for consent It's what employers do
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 12:42 PM
1

As if gay relationships based on chemsex are so very functional. Also, what are you even doing on this sub if you're not gonna debate anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 11:32 AM
3

Are you sure? https://ibb.co/wQSvDMm Candid photos of professional models are hard to find as they obviously cherry pick before they post, but there are enough examples if you look enough
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 07:27 AM
3

Oh there absolutely is, especially with sub-optimal photos. Literal supermodels look barely above average from certain angles.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 07:00 AM
1

It's nonsensical to qualify someone as annoying/obnoxious without interacting with them in any way, which is what you're doing. It's just a projection of your own neuroticism onto other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 01:06 AM
1

It's not on you to decide who's a creep and who's not in this scenario, it's on the other party in the theoretical relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 12:57 AM
1

A person doesn't magically turn into an adult the day they're 18 (not in the cognitive sense at least), and your whole argument is based on that comical assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 12:32 AM
1

I don't have to know anything about what life is as a woman because the statistics are freely available to everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 04:12 PM
1

Because I am extremely afraid of men Then that would probably be an irrational fear, especially if you live and spend most of your time in a well-off area
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 02:21 PM
1

If you want to marry someone at 30, you should probably be dating that person by like 25, Is this an American thing? My parents married 9 months into the relationship, had me 10 months later and are still together after 25 years. People with well-developed pattern recognition should have no problems vetting their partners in 12-18 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 09:14 AM
2

Reddit is a cesspool, this is not a common thing in reality
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 09:01 PM
1

You can't claim that something is a majority opinion while excluding ~50% of the population (men).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 02:44 PM
1

The Dutch are literally the only nation for which there is data for a positive selection of height. And can you even read, I posted an excerpt from a meta analysis showing that height has (practically) no effect on mating success, same goes for number of children.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 02:43 PM
1

Impossible to take "attraction" out of the equation when asking men to rate women lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 09:13 AM
1

Yeah, you conveniently chose the Dutch, now try to demonstrate the same findings in other nations. Here, let me start - The strongest associations with the mating domain were seen in terms of body masculinity (r = .133, 95% CI: [0.091, 0.176], q = .001; Figure 3), voice pitch (r = .132, 95% CI: [0.061, 0.204], q = .002; Figure 4), and testosterone levels (r = .093, 95% CI: [0.066, 0.121], q = .001; Figure 5). Height showed a significant but smaller effect size (r = .057, 95% CI: [0.027, 0.087], …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 09:08 AM
2

It's always been crazy to me how much a few inches can affect a man's reproductive success and how heavily women will perceive him. It's frightening. They absolutely don't. Men of all heights have the same amount of children
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 10:00 AM
3

objectively way prettier objective beauty defined as?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 09:53 AM
3

Gang shootings have nothing to do with women/misogyny/incels
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:46 PM
1

Why do you want to make YOUR OWN KIDS suffer because of the same genes that you suffered for too? Because that's not how complex characteristics like looks work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:47 AM
1

Just an all around ignorant comment, or are you trying to bait?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:16 AM
3

If she could love him, why did he have to change everything that he is to be someone else to be worthy of supposed love? This is the most ridiculous line of thought. Your improved self is an extension of your former one, not a completely different person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 05:35 PM
1

Ah yes, just move the goal posts. Perfect debating 👌
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 07:38 AM
1

And what happens when you get a girl in the bedroom? Or you she asks you to take a shower with her? Nothing, because they don't fall off
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 01:58 AM
2

What are you planning on dying from?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 10:38 AM
1

Lol, maybe you really shouldn't be on a debate sub
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 06:48 AM
0

Am I not allowed to point out a flawed assumption? Should I ask for permission next time before doing so?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 06:18 AM
1

💪💪
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 06:04 AM
0

I don't participate in subs like truerateme although I've spent quite a lot of time on its predecessor communities. That's what ultimately shaped my opinion that trying to quantify attractiveness is kind of pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:57 AM
4

Yours is useless too and with how much variance there is in who people are attracted to, you truerateme enjoyers might use a random number generator as well
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:55 AM
1

What makes an attractive face is someone possessing this. Okay, if a small, niche online community has said so, it must be so.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:46 AM
-1

Think of it like her having a gold medal in ice skating and you not giving a flying fuck about ice skating, because you like race cars and archery and HATE ice skating, you don't even think it should be a sport. Poor comparison - there is an established, objective scale to rate ice skaters on. There isn't one for beauty or attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:42 AM
4

Beauty isn’t a matter of opinion it’s a matter of fact. You might argue this for beauty/aesthetics, but it's absolutely wrong when it comes to "attractiveness"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:39 AM
3

I would love to know what on her face you would rank low. Why does it matter? What if you can't pinpoint exactly which feature makes her unattractive to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:38 AM
2

It's for med school right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 09:06 AM
7

The percentage of happily ever after marriages is estimated to be like ~13%. How does one even calculate this - at what point of marriage do you measure, do you control for variables etc? Mind sharing a source?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 09:31 AM
-1

Wait, what? 85% are great odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 09:27 AM
1

And you always start with the bone work i.e jaw surgery before fillers/implants, because results from osteotomies are pretty much never uncanny looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 09:17 AM
2

Yeah the nose is definitely the most “worth it” plastic surgery. For women, men rarely benefit a lot from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 08:44 AM
1

Isn't this Amnesia?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 09:54 AM
2

My first thought as well
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 07:18 AM
2

Stop clinging onto the surgeon example, it's not about the absolute stress level of any job, but rather it's discrepancy between the two partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 06:54 AM
1

Yet, most aren't doing high demand jobs to begin with so it's no point in bringing that up. Depends on your socioeconomic position, they aren't that rare to not be worth talking about ime.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 09:13 PM
1

Does not matter. No idea how you can't grasp the difference I doubt any person wants to come home after work and wants to do more work around the house. No one really wants to do any work most of the time, but I bet many people are in condition to come home and do some chores around the house. It's more fair to make the one who has spent half of their workday bullshitting do it rather than the one with a very demanding job.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 07:05 PM
3

A women working the same amount of hours as you is going to feel just as tired and worn out. Depends on the work. 8 hours of neurosurgery and 8 hours of Excel work lead to completely different levels of tiredness.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 04:16 PM
2

No, there is tons of data showing that cues of upper body strength such as shoulder-hip ratio are independent predictors of attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:39 AM
0

People relate with memes, like any other form of entertainment, so one could gain some insight into their beliefs by analysing what the most popular jokes are about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 07:15 AM
3

Are you on the spectrum by chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 06:07 PM
7

Because men's looks don't rely on soft tissue which is what plastic surgery is for. Check out results from maxillofacial procedures.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 12:42 AM
5

Magnus wins 90+% of their games, although Judith is an absolutely exceptional player
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 09:39 PM
0

Rape isn’t funny holy shit. ¿What is dark humor?, the comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 12:01 AM
9

What facts, boyo? Care to explain how every 12% BF 145lbs 6' football player could be considered overweight? What you said might only be possibly true for sports requiring some sort of heavy lifting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 02:26 PM
11

Sorry but this is borderline delusional
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 02:18 PM
1

That's the comeback a cholesterol-clogged amerishart brain can come up with
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:49 PM
1

Sorry, Amerifats
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:36 PM
1

Like we're all just taking causal strolls at night without a worry in the world. I do, regularly, in two major European cities. Where do you live that's so dangerous?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:27 PM
1

Eh, this is just one study on height. I have posted a meta analysis with an n in the thousands that shows pretty much no difference in mating success depending on height many times here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 11:17 AM
2

Yeah, a 5% increase in attractiveness might as well be categorized as "doesn't matter". Unless you're trying to minmax everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:52 AM
3

So much bolding yet omitted this "Each trait, respectively, explained an extra 6.1% and 5.1% of the total variation in relative attractiveness."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:42 AM
1

I microneedle and use Minox like every other day. You most likely need something to cover the androgens pathway - fin, RU, dut. How long have you been using your regimen?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 09:58 PM
1

Just nuke your testosterone You have no idea how any of this works, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 09:30 PM
1

It doesn’t promote the growth of new hair follicles. Oh they both absolutely do. Also, the Minox and collagen thing is just web mythology, I have never seen a proposed mechanism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 09:29 PM
3

Unless you're a deep NW6, hair loss is almost completely (in the cosmetic sense at least) reversible with what we have available right now. Finasteride+Minox+Microneedling and a transplant if needed should be enough for most.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 08:13 PM
1

Some people will be average, others won't lol. Big if true. But what if they're not average? In what, muscle insertions - if so, which ones? Being below average in every single one is going to be extremely rare as they are not correlated from what I've seen. Or bone structure, where again, being below average in clavicle width, pelvis width and whatever else might be relevant, is going to be a huge outlier? If its overall muscle building genetics, which is comprised of all genetic variables that…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 08:26 PM
1

You say you think genetics play a role, then in your very next sentence say they will both start with average muscle building genetics Do you want to re-read this and think again whether it's a logical question? Both are not mutually exclusive, they start with average genetics and get average results, given that they're chosen randomly from a random sample.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 05:57 PM
1

You must think genetics play no role in anything. We're all born equal, it's just our hard work that makes the difference Wrong, next baseless assumption, please. 2 men who train identically for identical time will get equal opposite sex attention All other things being equal, statistically, yes, they're both going to be starting with average muscle building genetics. Very foolish view. This refers to your own words that have been put into my mouth, right? You are beyond saving if you believe th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 05:46 PM
1

A normie can see the differences between the two bodies. And without a smidge of doubt conclude that Chris' is the better. Sure. Source is your crack pipe. Keep epoC-ing with the ad homs too, boyo Edit: on first glance, Vin has a better SWR, you've completely lost the plot.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:36 PM
1

Did you miss the "from the perspective of a normie" part or are you illiterate?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:30 PM
1

Big difference between the two. Now prove that this statement is true from the perspective of a normie. You really are that stupid, aren't you? Huge epoC
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:02 PM
2

Just agree with my opinion!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:02 PM
2

Then it's even more irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 12:42 PM
3

Not by bodybuilding standards. Narrow-ish shoulders and not great delts, very long core, narrow ribcage, obliques as you said. Probably 75th% population wide, but I absolutely see an Instagram-diseased brain obsessing over it. He still looks phenomenal to the general public.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 10:59 AM
5

Nope it's not irrelevant. 100% irrelevant. Look at Ronaldo, Gosling, even Hemsworth doesn't have the best genetics in a bodybuilding sense. They're still the pinnacle of physiques in the eyes of your everyday people
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 07:21 AM
-1

You really said "no" to just go on and agree
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 09:38 PM
0

If men with more testosterone are simply more likely so seak sexual relationships they will have more partners. Proof is on you. Most would agree that, generally, a person with an n count of 35 is more attractive than one with an n count of 1
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 09:34 AM
1

I love how you concluded that something is a myth based on one study. The strongest associations with the mating domain were seen in terms of body masculinity (r = .133, 95% CI: [0.091, 0.176], q = .001; Figure 3), voice pitch (r = .132, 95% CI: [0.061, 0.204], q = .002; Figure 4), and testosterone levels (r = .093, 95% CI: [0.066, 0.121], q = .001; Figure 5). https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.06.980896v4.full
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 02:13 AM
1

25-30% looks god-tier in this photo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 01:54 PM
1

Looks vulgar in a way
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 01:53 PM
7

masturbating to rape Consensual rape? Or do you mean that 80-something percent of porn scene include rape as in forced, non-consensual sexual act?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 07:36 PM
14

Damn, guess we should ban action movies as well, imagine how many deaths are going to be prevented
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 07:23 PM
1

the tall handsome man will be able to attract partners who are higher in desirability with less effort by bartering with higher physical attractiveness. He will likely be pickier than the less attractive man too. Now you added handsomeness to the mix. I'm done arguing with hypotheticals and speculations.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 06:47 PM
1

Mating has some correlation with attractiveness, but as you showed, it has a moderate correlation. Weak-to-moderate, to be precise. However, I still disagree with your earlier claim that male height is not a highly attractive trait to women. You can disagree all you want. My point that it is not a significant factor in physical attractiveness (voice pitch is a better predictor of sexual success lmao) has not been challenged in any meaningful way (yes, number of sexual partners is higher quality …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:22 PM
1

You might want to check what an r of ~.4 means.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 01:53 PM
1

Mating is not attractiveness. Honestly this deserves a laugh. People who sleep with you don't find you attractive now? Having sex with a person absolutely implies mutual sexual attraction (bar prostitution/rape). My sources were about what women desire. Your sources are worthless expressed preferences which mean jackshit if actions don't align with them. Again, by claiming they have any weight you're speculating that a significant amount of women are begrudgingly sleeping with short men, since t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 09:48 AM
3

The absolute state of a "debating" sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 06:05 AM
1

That’s not what it’s saying. Of the women surveyed, their height minimums averaged out to 5’9. The point isn’t that men below 5’9 can’t date. There were women with minimums above and below 5’9. But, height minimums around 5’9 or taller are common. Again, it would mean that shorter guys have significantly less sexual partners if women were acting according to their "preferences" And women show with their actions that many of them strongly prefer taller men, just like men show with their actions t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 06:04 AM
4

They have social value in their respective microcosms.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:05 AM
0

Relatedly, a study about height and human mate choice found that, on average, the shortest man a woman would date is 5 feet 9 inches tall. Wow, what a great study. All men below 5'9 have never dated anyone A study on women and men’s height preferences found that women are most satisfied when their partner was 8 inches (21cm) taller. Men are most satisfied when they are 3 inches (8cm) taller than their partner. Another study found that among men, 13.5 percent prefer to date only women shorter tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 11:22 PM
2

On average, being more conventionally attractive makes it easier to get attention from the people you’re most attracted to. You have to define "conventionally attractive". Height is one trait among others that can affect someone’s overall conventional attractiveness and their outcomes with more desirable people. The biggest dataset I've seen to date suggests that height has a pretty much negligible effect on attractiveness, behind traits like voice pitch, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:57 PM
4

So you're telling me that there is a huge number of women who begrudgingly fuck shorter men, enough to balance out the ones happily fucking tall guys? Talk about hamstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 08:51 PM
1

Mating success is defined as the number of sexual partners, your example is not relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 07:51 PM
2

You say that but I've had multiple girls say I'm too short and I'm 5ft 9. Height is just an easy (and somewhat socially accepted, as compared to saying someone is ugly) way to rationalize and express lack of attraction. Data shows that it plays a miniscule role in mating success (reproductive as well).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 07:18 PM
2

and if evidence of an (out of state) abortion is found Yeah, good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:11 PM
2

So how is that gonna work? Someone snitches on you then what?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:52 PM
2

states absolutely can and will pass laws forbidding their citizens from getting abortions in other states. Sounds absolutely unenforceable
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:30 PM
2

Put that guy in Norway, and 5'11" guy might as well be 5'. He's a shrimp. ??? 5'11 is dead average in Scandinavia, maaaaaybe 1 inch below average among affluent younger guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:56 PM
2

IIRC for 5'8.5 its 45% of women so basically you lose almost half of the dating pool for being slightly under average. Those are "preferences" in online dating. In reality, height has a miniscule effect on mating success (n count). Stated preferences and actions are two entirely different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:53 PM
7

In a lot of european countries the average male height is at least 6'0. If by a lot you mean 2 - Montenegro and the Netherlands (maybe Bosnia as well?), then yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:49 PM
1

worse in dating on average. Do they?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 11:43 AM
5

It's neutral if above the female average.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 11:39 AM
2

You felt small while being bang on average?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 11:31 AM
2

Yes, but a masculine body =/= masculine face. The analysis shows that a masculine body, which is mostly a synonym for a good shoulder-hip ratio, is far more important than a masculine face.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:53 PM
4

The strongest associations with the mating domain were seen in terms of body masculinity (r = .133, 95% CI: [0.091, 0.176], q = .001; Figure 3), voice pitch (r = .132, 95% CI: [0.061, 0.204], q = .002; Figure 4), and testosterone levels (r = .093, 95% CI: [0.066, 0.121], q = .001; Figure 5). Height showed a significant but smaller effect size (r = .057, 95% CI: [0.027, 0.087], q = .002 - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.06.980896v4.full
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 10:03 AM
1

There is some veeery slight correlation iirc
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 09:24 AM
1

You're not surveying every single person on earth. Study in New York, Jenny fucks Josh but next week he travels for work and sleeps with Jane from Austin.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 09:13 AM
1

have above average dicks get around more How did you come to this conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 03:23 PM
1

Once he becomes physically attractive, confidence and social skills will be incredibly easy to develop. A top 3 false belief held by looksmaxxers. No surgery for your neurotransmitters.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:50 AM
2

A very extreme unrealistic example that doesn't help your point in any way. A guy has 99% rejection rate but still goes out to approach. Delusional or confident and perseverant?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:26 AM
2

Confidence is self belief and the ability to back it up (as judged by an objective standard) . This definition is only used by you. The common one is "having trust in one's self", the outcome doesn't matter. Being good as judged by an objective standard is being competent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:35 AM
7

The most recent data shows that 30% of men 18-29 admit to being virgins. I think that was "have not had sex in the last year", not virginity. Well, unless you believe virginity resets every 12 months
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 06:25 AM
3

most people don't regard prostitution as having sex either. Absolute lol. What do they regard it as, then? Reading?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 05:46 AM
1

Pleasure?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 05:44 AM
2

The key here is defining the word "impressive". Imo, a natty with 2-3 years of consistent training looks veeery impressive next to a random sample of same age peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 06:03 PM
1

You are correct, my bad
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 06:02 PM
1

Even then, most people will look like shit. Which you define as?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 05:57 PM
1

Those ridiculous blackpoll tropes when it comes to physiques are always spouted by complete dyels
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 05:52 PM
1

9 hours of work plus a 2 hour commute makes 11 and is common in bigger cities, white collar job or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 05:48 PM
1

Now that's a "post body" moment if I've ever seen one
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 05:37 PM
1

How did you interpret "many acquaintances and straight up strangers" as majority strangers? But yeah, I know a decent amount who are followed by people they have met once/twice or are friends of friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 05:31 PM
1

If you only have friends as followers on social media, then sure, I get you. That's not the case for the majority, people often have many acquaintances and straight up strangers as followers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:20 PM
1

I do but I fail to see how both situations are even remotely comparable
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:38 PM
1

That's just not true
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 08:37 AM
4

thought they'd share. So that they'd get validation? Otherwise they could enjoy the view in their own privacy. Same goes for men and gym photos with a pump, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 08:06 AM
1

Yes, it's statistically significant (meaning it's not a coincidence) but the effect size is veeery small.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 08:53 PM
1

The strongest associations with the mating domain were seen in terms of body masculinity (r = .133, 95% CI: [0.091, 0.176], q = .001; Figure 3), voice pitch (r = .132, 95% CI: [0.061, 0.204], q = .002; Figure 4), and testosterone levels (r = .093, 95% CI: [0.066, 0.121], q = .001; Figure 5). Height showed a significant but smaller effect size (r = .057, 95% CI: [0.027, 0.087], q = .002 - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.06.980896v4.full
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 06:59 PM
0

Yeah, sure, but it's also not necessary to be extremely good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 12:15 PM
2

Are you highly neurotic/agreeable or non-NT?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 05:21 AM
1

So you don't define looking better than ~80% of men as good-looking?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 05:17 AM
2

What kind of random answer is that? Just back up your claims, otherwise the sub is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 04:33 AM
0

I've been doing that my whole life. Try backing up your claims in a debate sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 04:32 AM
2

You have to prove that physical attractiveness is entirely dependent on facial attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 09:20 PM
0

Zero proof of this. Unfortunately cba to post a meta analysis with an n in the (tens of?) thousands showing zero correlation between height and sexual and reproductive success.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 09:18 PM
1

I use ~10g of pure l-citrulline and don't notice any dramatic effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 11:17 PM
1

If you have these things, it's really difficult to look good even after putting on muscle. Your genetics determine how well the muscle sits on your body. Only in your Instagram tainted mind. "Normies" find Ryan Gosling's body very pleasing and I'd say he has pretty average genetics overall. A Shoulder-to-hip ratio of 1.618, pretty much the only relevant male physique characteristic is attainable for the majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:19 AM
1

vindicated by the fact that careful and nuanced facial plastic surgery has done way more for my forays into dating than any sort of RP game. Plastic or maxillofacial surgery?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:11 AM
1

Men don’t own their money. ? It can be stolen from you. ??
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 04:27 PM
1

That's why I'm asking what your criteria for an engineering gem are. Also, Wikipedia says the Viper ACR was a couple of seconds faster than the LFA in 2011, while something like the 997 gt2 rs had both a higher top speed, and a better 0-60.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 03:09 PM
1

The engineering and craftsmanship that went into the LFA far exceed anything porsche has ever built. Huh? How do you even measure that? The LFA wasn't even the fastest on Nürburgring in 2011.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 08:33 AM
0

Personality is largely irrelevant in attracting women No, this is wildly off base. Being neurodivergent or mentally ill is the biggest disadvantage in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:04 PM
1

once we push those natural limits it will become uglier again, just like the uncanny valley And I say that this occurs well within the natural limits, that is - a face with 70% symmetry and 70% femininity could have broader appeal than a face with 85% symmetry and 85% femininity (random values for the sake of the argument). This is supported by countless anecdotes of people finding truerateme 7s as more attractive than 9s. beauty is dictated by, math, like everything in the universe Empty truism…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 11:50 AM
1

therefore a woman with even more femininity and facial symmetry makes a woman more "beautiful" According to who? You? Have you heard about diminishing returns? You have zero empiric proof that just increasing femininity and symmetry leads to increased perceived attractiveness. See basketball, where height is only good up until a certain point. but mathematically she is more beautiful Ah yes, forgot Perelman proved this not too long ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:53 AM
1

the diagram is just about who is has more feminine features and facial symmetry Which you are yet to prove that lead to higher rated attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:42 AM
1

if you found a 7 a 7, then why would that same logic not apply to women that are even more feminine and have more striking unique features ​ im just using the same criteria you used to compare a 4 to a 7 but now using ti to compare between a 7 and a 9 I'm not the original poster, so I didn't compare anything to anything, but nvm. The point was there is a threshold of diminishing returns, imo around the 85th/90th percentile of looks where things such as phenotype and whether she resembles a woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 06:41 AM
1

yall just hate the fact that their are women prettier than you I'm a man, why would I hate a woman for being prettier than me? if an 7 is better looking than a 4 due to better facial harmony, better symmetry and more feminine features, then why would a 9 not also be the same compared to a 7 Because again, we run into the objective rating problem. If you find a 9 a 9, does that mean that everyone does? Or maybe more than 50% of men? Is it possible that your 9 is so niche that she's gonna be rated…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 04:49 AM
2

they are 9s and 10s that's your evidence Circular reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:15 PM
2

But the other poster should surely have seen it as well if her friends go for such men as well. Or are you implying shes lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 04:30 AM
5

Huh? He'd be dead average height in both the UK and most of Italy and I don't see being white as an advantage in either of those countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 04:18 AM
6

The girl I’m seeing currently is 30 but looks about 38 in the face, has a cat she talks to like a child and sleeps for 12 hours a day. You're probably overestimating your looks then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 04:16 AM
3

No u lmao, the absolute state of your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 03:54 AM
0

So how do you know it happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 03:45 AM
1

Most CEOs, rich guys, leaders, presidents, etc are 6 footers, I don’t think is just a coincidence. Yes, mostly white men with Nordic/Anglo backgrounds from affluent families, ofc they're going to be above average, especially in an ethnically heterogeneous place like the US. I don't think such a phenomenon exists in Europe, on the other hand. 5'10 and 6'2 is noticeable irl, sure, but height is absolutely never going to be the only factor and, especially when the shorter of the two guys is still w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 09:38 PM
1

You're mixing IRL with Tinder, height is obviously easier to gouge in person and especially when around other people. Even then, height has never been shown to influence neither sexual nor reproductive success in any meaningful amount.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 06:20 PM
1

Being 6’4 puts you in the 99th percentile of height and girls feel “protected” with you. You stand out from the mass of regular dudes on tinder, how is that not a huge advantage. Tough to gouge how tall some is unless they have pics next to (ostensibly) shorter dudes. Also, height is mostly a disqualifier and gives diminished returns after 5'11-6 feet (depending on location ofc).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 06:18 PM
-4

Being 6'4 doesn't do anything on its own, especially on Tinder
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 07:16 PM
3

That guy specifically is in a ridiculously good shape given how he looks, a huge exception ofc
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 06:22 PM
1

full power, brother
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 06:21 PM
1

Both lower your inhibition and make you more likely to engage in social activities, so both increase your chances of getting laid, yes
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 04:48 PM
2

K.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 11:19 PM
2

Being 6' in a Western country wouldn't compensate for a bad face either. Fix obvious facial flaws if possible e.g. over-/underbite, goofy ears, crooked nose etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 11:14 PM
1

The humerus can definitely be lengthened.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 11:10 PM
3

Leg lengthening is, statistically speaking, a pretty safe procedure when done by a knowledgeable surgeon. I imagine PE is extremely rare and probably the least of ones concerns with LL.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 11:06 PM
3

Imagine thinking virgin men are rejecting women. Indirectly rejecting by not actively engaging with them, sure
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:55 PM
0

Good on you that you're this confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 09:49 AM
3

attention is basically the only reason someone would get a tattoo Doesn't explain tattoos in very discreet spots like the upper thigh or underboob area. Hell, some people have tatts on their soles.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 09:36 AM
2

Bold of you to think that most peoples bodies are Ferraris.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 09:31 AM
–

Studies show women value shoulder size in relation to hip width aka SHR, whether it comes from long clavicles or developed deltoids doesn't really matter. Also, the variance in clavicle length is not that big, average height men are going to be in a range of ~1cm of each other, a difference that can easily be compensated with some muscle mass. Tldr - shoulder width is rarely a problem if you lift.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 01:44 AM
1

Just a bad angle, Noszka's face is incredibly well-developed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:43 PM
1

My comment was sarcastic. Extremely low-trust features Tyson got cucked by high-trust Pitt.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:33 PM
1

Also the reason why pretty boy Pitt fucked Mike Tyson's girlfriend. Guess Kid Dynamite isn't masc enough lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:18 PM
1

You don't. But odds are, you have a good enough frame so that you'll look great with a low enough bf% and well developed shoulders/back. It's only the bottom 5% of frames that are kind of doomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:11 PM
2

The ability to build a lot of muscle is also genetic, this reasoning doesn't really make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:09 PM
1

Bald implies an inability to grow hair, shaved is the choice to wear a very short haircut, generally. Bald - https://www.gethealthystayhealthy.com/sites/default/files/2020-04/living-with-alopecia_1_0.jpg Balding - https://www.dovepress.com/cr_data/cache/submission_images/s153000/153768/29_dec_2017_153768_fig390.jpg Shaved - https://bi.im-g.pl/im/a4/72/1a/z27730596Q,Sinead-O-Connor.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 03:38 PM
1

Bald or shaved?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:43 AM
11

You're falling for the bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 09:51 AM
3

The usual cop-out. Unless you're bottom 5% of clavicle length, you can achieve the golden SHR of 1.61
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 09:28 PM
2

Not being conventionally attractive and being attractive to your partner are not mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 10:19 AM
1

There is no significant difference in reproductive success between short and tall men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 10:17 AM
2

It doesn't either. It's not looks that decide whether good people stick around.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 10:15 AM
1

This statement doesn't make a lot of sense. Do you mean %death of BBL vs %death of confirmed heart attack or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 10:50 PM
2

Narcissistic behavior, not a gender-specific one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:19 AM
2

The ordinary citizen isn't 4'11 with hyperhidrosis
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 11:19 PM
1

Which means that 70% do have sex though, that's far from a minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:26 PM
1

It’s a taxpayer issue not a male issue. Just because women contribute as well, doesn't mean men don't. Your statement was wrong no matter how you try to twist it. Sure, a daughter can tarnish your name as well. I used a son because the previous comments were about sons as far as I remember.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:26 PM
0

Most 20 year old men get absolutely no attention from girls, because all the girls only have eyes for the hottest, tallest rich boy. C word that ends with -ope. Most young guys have sex rather frequently.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 11:47 AM
1

Men put zero effort in child production outside of an orgasm. Wrong, they pay taxes which go towards supporting single mothers and also support their own wives most of the times. But that's beside the point - if your son fails utterly in life in some way or another, he will always be associated with you because of the name. Its a double-edged sword.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 11:44 AM
1

. They tried to only mate with tall, strong, socially connected, intelligent, capable males/men. Or the tall, strong males were more likely to successfully impregnate a female through rape
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:35 AM
0

. It’s like bringing markers to a group project, sleeping through all the work and then taking all the credit What if the project turns out to be a failure?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:21 AM
27

Older as in 1-5, not 10-15
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:19 AM
2

Men are way more competitive intra-sexually
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 11:51 PM
1

My experience has been different but it's pointless to debate like this
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 10:20 PM
1

No it doesn't, where did you get this from?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 08:37 PM
1

Looks being more important than personality does not counter my point of looks only explaining a miniscule part of what attraction entails
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:52 PM
2

All things being equal But they never are
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 10:39 AM
1

Yeah, I really don't get why people are so obsessed with the idea that one's love life or lack there of is caused by who you are as a person rather than how good looking(or not) you are, Because physical attributes have a pretty small effect on attractiveness across most studies. See - https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2158244015605160, where physical attractiveness had an r of .36, with "warmth" standing at .29
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 10:34 AM
1

And you expect people like myself to just “get out there” and “be extroverted?” Come on now. Drugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 10:17 AM
1

Anything that’s out of place makes you automatically below average. Never true if you mean a population-based average. Most people have some little things that are off.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 09:57 AM
1

No, you not understanding my initial comment is what's dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 02:16 AM
1

So his initial comment about winning the game of propagating his genes was dumb. Okay, we agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 02:04 AM
0

So what game has he won?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 01:56 AM
2

She's probably either lying about the number of guys in that range she's been with She most definitely is. Only one 9in.+ penis has been measured in a clinical setting (and that was a stretched flaccid). Ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 01:48 AM
-1

Your ape brain has won the game, sure. But you're more than that, aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 01:37 AM
1

By the pictures of it, it seems to be something for people who are extremely fucked up already, which is not the case for most people. Those are the cases where it's a medical necessity, but it's also used for aesthetic purposes. Even Tom Cruise has most likely had a jaw surgery. I don't know what your exact point is with hair transplants. They are very effective for men with mild to moderate balding (NW3-5), which entails the majority of single guys anyway. If the balding has progressed, there …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 01:35 AM
2

Maxillofacial surgery is extremely effective, believe me. Then there is also stuff like custom implants, fillers and hair transplants. Also, why do you care if it's acceptable, you don't get a tattoo on your forehead saying "I GOT SURGERY".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 09:13 PM
1

What if focusing on looks is simply not a possibility It's always a possibility, people underestimate what surgery is capable of. The only real barrier are the costs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 12:28 PM
1

No, you claimed it has a 1 year recovery period, which would be a complete outlier. You don't know the meaning of "recovery period" if you put pre-OP braces, which are not needed in every case, to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:23 PM
1

This shit ain’t breast implants. Stop it. Where have I said it was? Please don't put words in my mouth. Now, if you consider braces as part of the recovery process, sure, 1 year until everything's done with is a good estimate. Point still stands that DJS alone typically has a recovery time of around 6 months. Gosling has a good lower third I would say it's about average for a guy at his BF%, definitely not Hollywood-tier good.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 02:44 PM
1

It would have been a closed system only if they had asked the whole population of the planet. Here is an example - you do a survey on a college campus, 1k females and 1k males. The females all answer that they haven't had sex (for the sake of simplicity), while the males answer that each has a body count of 1 or higher. Does that mean one of the groups is lying? No, it just means that the guys were having sex with girl from the other college that's in the same town. You can obviously use this ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 02:36 PM
2

Gosling and Michael B. Jordan don't have the best facial bones and are still considered good-looking. Also, depending on how recessed one is, implants might be a good solution, but even a double-jaw surgery is not all that gruesome and definitely doesn't require a 1 year recovery.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:31 AM
2

What makes you think the system is closed? Obviously not all of the sexually active people on the planet were surveyed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:21 AM
1

That's claiming social skills play no role in attraction, but they definitely do. Neurotypicality is the biggest predictor of lack of mating success
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 10:26 AM
1

If you think 5'9 guys have the same access to women as 6'5 guys, all else being equal, you need to do some more research. There is absolutely nothing, either scientific or anecdotal, that really supports that theory. No, you. Height has a laughably small effect on both mating and reproductive success, my comment history has a study with an n in the thousands that supports this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:59 PM
1

Only around 40% of guys have enough looks to trigger real attraction in some women, and only around 15% have the looks to trigger that in most women. If you're not at least a "6", the only women you'll get are those willing to settle for you and sell you an illusion of love. Trust me bro
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:56 PM
1

You can hamster your way out of everything by projecting something wild onto someone and then using that as your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:51 PM
0

Most guys don’t GAF so long as she looks good with her face on. Not my experience but I suspect there is no way to change your mind on this if you happen to be one of the guys that don't care about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:43 AM
1

Being high-status is indicative of possessing desirable neurochemical genetics though. Neurotic introverts are rarely popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:37 AM
1

Status =/= being a Hollywood-tier celeb, it just means being the best in a certain niche, think the best climber in your local bouldering gym. Of course, some are more widely attractive e.g. a popular local musician as compared to the climber.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:34 AM
1

I just don’t see how the obese 5’6 lead comedian has anything on 6’2 chad who is a 9/10. Extreme examples "disprove" the point, who would've thunk?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:29 AM
1

Yes, because op wrongly defines "status" as "being a high-earner"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:23 AM
1

Owning a generic business doesn't get you any status. Being the most popular in some niche does.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:22 AM
1

Make-up only works as a short term facade. You're still going to see her without it rather quickly if you become intimate with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:07 AM
1

Could generally be true but it's muscle group dependent as well, claiming that women's muscles are resistant to fatigue if laughable
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 10:45 AM
1

Define it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 10:36 AM
1

women’s muscles are RESISTANT to fatigue ?¿?¿
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 09:59 AM
1

Prove it then
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 09:50 AM
1

What a refutal lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 09:31 AM
1

How do you define "a genetically superior child"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 09:27 AM
3

Because lack of sex doesn't directly cause death. Good bait though
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 01:37 AM
3

Good job on the troll acc
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 11:06 AM
2

Scihub?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 10:56 AM
1

You might want to check out the second link, it's a meta-analysis and the N for height alone is in the tens of thousands.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 01:52 PM
1

This is just false. Have you got any evidence to back this up? Physical attractiveness, which includes height, correlates with romantic interest at r=.36 - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015605160 The strongest associations with the mating domain were seen in terms of body masculinity (r = .133, 95% CI: [0.091, 0.176], q = .001; Figure 3), voice pitch (r = .132, 95% CI: [0.061, 0.204], q = .002; Figure 4), and testosterone levels (r = .093, 95% CI: [0.066, 0.121], q = .001; Figu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:58 PM
1

Height doesn't even have that big of an effect on attractiveness and sexual success according to adequately organized studies (not pointless "would you date a 5'6 man questionnaires"). Yes, it might be a very influential physical feature, but it still accounts for like 8-10% of the variance. If you want to talk about deal-breakers, neurotypicality and mental illness are by far the biggest ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 11:07 AM
3

Facial aesthetics blow height out of the water especially as you get to 5'9 and above.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:04 AM
1

What does "really caring" even mean lmao. Actively expressing you wish something would be different, it implies some level of dissatisfaction with the current state.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:56 PM
1

Do you have anything against unnecessary and generally irreversible medical procedures being performed on babies?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:54 PM
2

I don't have to be scared about a not working penis because just because I forgot to wash my dick for a day. This doesn't happen
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:51 PM
1

Even if uncircumcised men were more easily stimulated, the brain would compensate for that and lessen the amount of dopamine receptors. Why when it's at homeostasis? You're not going from circumcised to uncircumcised for a modulatory mechanism to be required, that's just the default state.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 01:33 PM
2

Good bait
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:34 AM
6

"The results showed that only single women were more interested in pursuing an attached target rather than a single target." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.022 Muh porn
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:13 AM
1

short men being hated because they're insufferable assholes. You got a peer-reviewed, twitter approved sauce for that one?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 01:26 AM
2

I respect that you're consistent in your position, even though I disagree with it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:27 PM
4

Would you be angry if a woman saw you getting mugged and didn't call 911/tried to intervene in an adequate way?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:16 PM
0

Gigacope
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:02 PM
2

Neurotypicality shows a stronger effect on attractiveness and sexual success than height in every study I've seen on the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 09:51 AM
1

Haha
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:07 AM
1

No need to be 99.9th percentile to do well either
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:03 AM
–

The one who created the meme has deliberately listed the most delusional of copes. HT instead of shaving, maxfac surgery instead of clenching jaw etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:45 AM
1

Hair transplant, leg lengthening surgery, whatever craniofacial surgery needed. There.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:40 PM
1

His looks like overdone filler work
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:56 AM
2

We're talking about several hundreds of millions of women here mate, not several thousand. Did you go through all of their profiles? Are there all real? How many of them are bots from an Indian botting farm? Are all of those likes actually all women? How many are gay men? There's also no reason to think that the women who aren't posting on TikTok somehow have an inherently different sexuality to the women who are on it. There absolutely is and my anecdotal experience confirms it. My gf doesn't h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 01:52 PM
2

What conclusion are men supposed to come to, after seeing all this on a daily basis That they need to learn what selection bias is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 11:00 AM
3

That's definitely not the right comparison. 5'5 is 7.5th percentile while 6'5 is 99.6th percentile. You should be comparing 5'5 to 6'1.5.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 11:06 PM
-2

You have no idea what marital coercion is, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 10:55 AM
3

The girls are taller as well so it cancels out.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 12:50 AM
1

I personally haven't seen ugly people with good looking kids Leo DiCaprios parents are quite unattractive
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 10:22 AM
10

a lot of y’all short A lot of you all are even shorter. If shortness is objectively bad, then women take the L. Bald Female pattern hair loss is not as common as the male pattern one, but the prevalence is still around 15-20%, so not quite rare Recessed chins and jawlines Just as common in women as in men, no reason to think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:52 AM
3

Didn't Bezos cheat on his wife first?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 03:17 PM
3

You can say it's a victim complex but after spending 8 years on the "self-improvement" train to no avail Did you try actually doing something about your looks i.e. a hair transplant, fixing your skin/teeth etc.?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 02:47 PM
1

NW2 doesn't register as "balding" in unaware peoples heads though
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 01:01 PM
1

Way more pronounced on planet Europe, as Caucasians are the most prone
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 03:56 AM
1

Of masturbation leading to long-term downregulation of specific receptor populations in specific areas of the brain. Androgens, for example, trigger positive feedback loops in some tissues and negative ones in others. Edit: and, most importantly, of that having any substantial influence on the life of people
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 10:17 AM
2

If we crack the reward system you won't run into the problems heroin comes with because there is going to be an after-heroin-pill that completely reverses any neurochemical changes thus preventing addiction. Like a time-machine for brain processes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 08:35 AM
-1

Doesn't tell you anything about their subjective experience. Many might say they don't have it bad without sex
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 08:28 AM
1

That doesn't even touch the fact that excessive masturbation probably wreaks havoc on various endocrine and neurotransmitter related systems via receptor downregulation. Big claim, 0 evidence provided.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 07:50 AM
1

because big dicks correlate with other traits they value such as heigh, large frame, masculine facial structure, confidence (big dick energy) ect.. Biggest porn actors are literal twinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 02:41 PM
2

Both L'pool and London are not in the European Union anymore but that's beside the point. One thing is saying Jolie is not attractive to you, but claiming she is somehow objectively nothing special because your son's girlfriend is apparently way better looking than her is not compelling at all
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 09:34 PM
3

If you’re a man and that’s 85th percentile where you live I would suggest moving. Multi-million EU city with a blooming youth culture. Jolie is easily above 80th percentile if we consider all ethnicities and financial backgrounds. Probably drops to 60-65th if we talk UMC and above. Since our subjective evaluations differ so much, I can run her face on a professional maxillofacial software for a more objective perspective and I bet all her values and ratios are going to be top tier. Also - https:…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 07:48 PM
2

no heavy make-up as far as I can tell, still easily 85th percentile Post a significantly better looking girl with the same amount of make-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 06:38 PM
0

Are you replying to the wrong comment buddy? There are no women anywhere in the picture, I (male) know that a very close male friend of mine has always been loyal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 06:11 PM
3

AJ is no beauty either, Yeah what an uggo, 4 at best You're the male equivalent of women claiming Tom Cruise is "not that good looking"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 05:48 PM
1

Why would they lie to a very close male friend?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 04:52 PM
3

The most attractive guys I know are extremely loyal
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 12:24 PM
–

Do you know why death is a tragedy? It is because other people miss the person who died. Nobody misses somebody who was never born, nor should they. Is painlessly killing a person who won't be missed by anyone okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 01:48 PM
1

Antigonadotropins suppress the HPG and thus lower androgens.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 01:33 PM
–

All of them include death by the way You can die from water. Death from BC is incredibly rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 01:25 PM
1

They like the face attached to the roided body
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 12:57 PM
1

Being a massive cunt isn't illegal sure, you're still a massive cunt. And frankly, if a pro-lifer thinks that of me, I'm doing it right ;) not the pro-lifer you're looking for here. i'm pro-choice since contraceptives are not 100% reliable and sex with a condom is worse than wanking
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 07:32 PM
1

Very interested to see how would a study account for those miscarriages and how did you arrive to such a concrete number in this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 06:11 PM
1

I can absolutely kick someone out of my house at any time, and whatever happens to them following that isn't my problem. you'd be a massive cunt if you had prior knowledge about the risks you're exposing them to by kicking them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 04:26 PM
1

half of all pregnancies end in miscarriage No they don't "Overall, in 1998, 11.2% of registry-identified pregnancies resulted in miscarriage; in 2016, their proportion was 8.3%", a study in 128k women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 03:55 PM
2

up to 300 rubles
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 02:54 PM
3

No, they have better "brain genes" than you
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 01:00 PM
1

lso from your site, western average penis length is like 5"6.666 with an SD of over 1/2 inch. With chemically induced erections, so slightly bigger than what you'd encounter IRL
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:59 PM
1

Amazing 1/month
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 07:14 PM
1

HUmanity is a parasite. Evolution favours parasitic mega-consumers, it leads to the highest entropy. It is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 04:32 PM
1

9in is very rare Not even rare, 9in has never been measured in a controlled setting.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 12:30 AM
3

What is the definition of a "polluted gene pool" lol? And please don't answer with "mutations"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 12:37 AM
6

It's obviously true that height and dick size would be correlated, generally. Did you inspect thousands of tall guys cocks or something? How is it so obviously true to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:10 PM
6

You think any 5'6" guy has a dick the size of LeBron? Are you being serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:22 PM
2

Do you have to be promiscuous to be considered sexually successful though?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 07:46 PM
1

Yeah, it's just a ridiculous oversimplification of utterly complex systems.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 02:27 PM
10

From study one - "Photographs of 25 men enrolled in a U.S. university’s full-time MBA program were selected from the institution’s online directory. Each man was photographed on an identical background from the chest up wearing a dark suit and tie. Ten of the men (five White, five Black) had shaved heads. The remaining 15 men (10 White, 5 Black) wore their cranial hair in styles ranging from closely cropped and short to neck length and full. The men had minimal facial hair, if any (none had bear…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 10:40 AM
1

yeah, something like this
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:23 PM
2

It is 2008 extravagant in every major European capital for people in the 18-40 bracket, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:19 PM
2

He's just the top guy (or one of) in his respective sphere (which just so happens to have a decent amount of females as well). It's the same 80-20/90-10 principle but reduced to a niche. I bet that most of the male students at his lecture that you linked are below-average to average in their dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 11:12 AM
2

He'd look way less ridiculous in a skater outfit with a hoodie, jeans and sneakers. Thinking anyone other than male models can pull off such an extravagant style is laughable in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 10:58 AM
2

Serbia is more Central/Southeast Europe than EE and there is definitely going to be a difference between the mentality in Serbia/Macedonia/Bulgaria and Poland/Belarus, even though they are frequently lumped together geopolitically
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 09:29 AM
5

"Breaking things down a little more, a survey by Cosmopolitan found that 3.8 percent of women who watch porn say they use it daily, 25 percent say once every few days, and 71.2 percent say they don't use it that often." 71 is kinda close to 90 don't you think? Especially considering biological differences in sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 03:27 PM
6

PornHub is the biggest porn website. Do you think the women registered there don't consume porn regularly? If so, what makes you think that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:59 PM
5

PornHub was 32% female in 2019, up 3% from 2018 - in 5 or so years the userbase is going to be 50-50. Does that mean women are undatebale as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:43 PM
3

damn, you're making me sad
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:38 PM
5

Are you a gay man?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:32 PM
3

I have no idea what gay males find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:29 PM
13

Fat on women is attractive X to doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:26 PM
8

I included stats The stats on bed washing are crap (almost 20% of young people wash their sheets after a single use, old people skew higher), "stats" on gaming addiction are not actually stats; obesity rates are practically identical for both genders; your article about manchildren doesn't have any meaningful stats as well, just that males are more affected; your madonna-whore complex article doesn't have any stats either. But stats, okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:18 PM
5

Seems like baseless conjecture to me but okay
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:07 PM
3

bunch of retards Don't Phil. Majors have the second highest IQ scores though?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 10:23 AM
1

There are treatments for balding just like there are for acne, weaves are mostly left behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 09:08 AM
1

Klitschko is 13-14% in this photo. Joshua, Mayweather, Pacquiao, Golovkin are all in the sub 15% range which I consider ripped given the state of the average male.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 06:51 PM
1

But this "muscular" stuff as in what's achieved by cutting body fat isn't. Fighters are quite low BF% most of the time and are very much built for performance if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 09:50 AM
1

1 with smaller boobs and it's not even close. Bell is way too short for my preference at 5'1 and Rousey's way too masculine, I dislike any amount of trained, hypertrophied muscle on women, including the typical IG fitness chick trained legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 08:59 AM
1

What about the kids born to such mothers?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 08:41 PM
1

So people who a risk takers have good genes? What other criteria go into the calculation - does a risk-friendly congenitally blind guy have good genes?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 09:45 PM
11

as relevant as those of a 50+ years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 12:15 PM
-1

Okay, I can see the "If I have a child with a handsome guy they have a bigger chance to be handsome themselves and thus sexually successful", which is a dubious at best imo (check Di Caprios parent; maternal attractiveness is completely disregarded etc.) But "growing up healthier" aka the good genes hypothesis is heavily disputed, if not outright debunked
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 10:35 AM
0

woman get pregnant by a tatted up bad boy By what definition does a tatted up bad boy have "good genes"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 10:04 AM
5

There's a threshold where it starts to look like a caveman. 0.1% of the male population. If anything, men's faces are most often not dimorphic enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 08:24 AM
5

What else besides genuine attraction is keeping a 25yrs old girl in a relationship with a 26yrs guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 06:51 PM
0

only those who were destined to succeed will. Only those with access to roids lol. And for the latter part of your comment - don't rot with video games but inform yourself on the other possible cheat codes while your competition is in the dark.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 12:37 AM
2

You can't pass down the last 2 years you spent in the gym But the results you get in those two years are an extremely good indicator of the quality of the genes that are going to be instrumental for the mating success of the male offspring - testosterone, androgen-mediated pathways etc. It's curious how people forget the body one is able to achieve in the gym is also heavily influenced by their genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 11:09 PM
5

there is no term for male "butterfaces" like there is for women? There is - gymcels. Or the common trope about the ugly guy overcompensating with weightlifting.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 11:06 PM
7

And it doesn't really happen, beautiful faces are beautiful no matter the race.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 07:19 PM
2

I'm neither in China nor in Japan. In the West aesthetic surgery is a blooming industry and it's only going to get bigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 12:02 AM
2

We seem to be moving towards that being illegal. No we do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 09:01 AM
5

like face Cheat genetics and get surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 11:45 PM
1

Is he attractive? 40th percentile for a white guy imo
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 09:42 AM
0

How does that change anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 09:39 AM
2

I can find it, but it might get deleted as incl content. Gonna PM it to you as well
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 11:54 PM
1

On a certain lookism-related website there is a report (photos and videos) of a very average, 5'8 white guy who went to Ukraine and slayed like crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 11:34 PM
2

Remember average girls who go clubbing can get guys like this like it's nothing. makes absolutely no sense since there are always going to be better looking chicks for guys like that one. remove the cameras and this girl goes home alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 12:40 PM
2

The guy with the glasses? Why? He seems properly developed to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 02:26 PM
1

Men with penile cancer. Sexual contact with animal is a huge risk factors, it's like taking a study that says that 75% of lung cell cancer patients smoke and extrapolating that to the general public.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 11:39 AM
1

better example is Chris Evans I always think of Joe Manganiello when this topic comes up
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 12:08 AM
1

It is legit, yes. Especially when combined with Minoxidil
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 11:51 PM
3

Or she's not nowhere near an 8
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 01:46 PM
2

Not like women can also carry genes that contribute to ugliness, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 08:44 AM
1

While controlling for height, probably not. Most really narrow shouldered guys are also short from what I've seen. A close comparison would be UFC fighter Wanderlei Silva at 5'11 and Steve Reeves at ~6ft.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:22 PM
3

I work with some slightly different definitions. Chad is a guy who has the right combination of looks and personality traits required to find enjoyment in racking up big N counts and being successful at it. Not every very gl guy is a slayer, I actually know quite a few very physically attractive dudes that can't be bothered with OLD and just go into LTRs with some similarly attractive girls. With that in mind, give an incel/struggling guy Chad's physical attributes and his success won't be anywh…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 12:57 PM
1

Guy on the left is holding dumbbells that are pulling his shoulders/clavicles down and the guy on the right actually has quite the child birthing pelvis. Is he broader? Yes. But he is most likely quite taller as well so proportions-wise the difference is not that stark.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 12:47 PM
3

looking good without making it look like you’re trying to look good. The ultimate display of genes
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 09:53 AM
2

Yeah but it puts it into perspective - that stranger was most likely a weirdo and does not represent the taste of the majority
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 01:04 AM
2

Women with "strong features" are still sex symbols though - Doutzen Kroes, Irina Shayk etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 12:53 AM
1

their partners are coincidentally attractive, 6ft tall, successful, fit, and well endowed Yeah, no doubt lol, reminds me of TRPers who bang 9s and models on the regular. 100% genuine and real.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 08:14 PM
3

Butterface
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 05:02 PM
1

Is there actually any evidence that declining androgens makes men more attracted to neoteny than we otherwise would be? Probably not and people tend to overestimate how much a drop in T levels affects a person, especially if the lower value is still in the physiological range i.e a drop from 800ng/dL to 500ng/dL. There are just way too many factors downstream in the androgen pathway for the conclusion to be that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 04:50 PM
2

There is no PCOS "gene", are you thinking of a genetic variant/SNP? Also, most such diseases are polygenic, requiring mutations in genes that are otherwise part of normal development like SHH in male pattern baldness, for example, and those are genes that every person has. If we apply your (very wrong) logic to pretty much every disorder, the result would be that not a single one of them is caused by the environment, bar infections. Radiation doesn't cause cancer if you have some crazy good DNA …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 04:42 PM
3

Also, PCOS is genetic, not environmental. PCOS has a strong environmental component to it as well. "Recent observations point to the higher levels of BPA in biological fluids of women with PCOS and its role in the pathogenesis of hyperandrogenism and hyperinsulinemia. It seems that mother’s exposure to BPA during pregnancy may also lead to the development of PCOS in the female offspring." Inquiring the generative roots of the syndrome, it has become increasingly apparent the role of the environm…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 04:31 PM
1

the intended goal is to separate the victim from the abuser Then escort them back to their own home lmao. It's all up to the officer that will check up on us and they can do whatever the fuck they want to. Could be solved with a small bribe if the dynamics in your country allow for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 11:45 AM
1

You just cant enter your flat for 2 weeks. Fucking cage. What's the goal here - stimulating the the hotel industry by forcing you to sleep in one for two weeks? What is the public reaction?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 11:26 AM
1

Even a total stranger you came home with after a party can do that. There's no need to be in any kind of relationship and the "victim" does not need to have any rights to your flat. Wait, so what is going to happen? The flat gets transferred to them or is just left vacant? This sounds ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 11:17 AM
1

I bet pugs complain on dog-forums about their dating struggles and how Chad dobermann is what all of the puggerinas like
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 08:42 PM
2

Harder glass is more scratch-resistant but breaks easily, softer glass can survive worse drops but gets scratched by air. Most people prefer the second option and thats why newer phones are generally more prone to scratching.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:17 PM
1

Come on, you're from a Nordic country, he's definitely not 1 in 10 000.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 08:47 PM
1

Any combination of these gets you a wife Good thing we have Testosterone in a vial then
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 06:32 PM
9

Face-wise easily above 95th percentile
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 02:03 PM
1

~40th percentile, so anywhere from 4 to a 4.5
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 10:45 AM
2

but sometimes I feel like some people are too easily impressed with decent but amateurish naturalistic paintings. Do you think that such a level could readily be obtained by any amateur, without requiring any "talent", and thus it lacks value? I've always wondered this when such a topic comes up - a popular piece is critiqued by snobs, but very well received by the masses. Given that there are no objective set of criteria to evaluate the quality of an art form (and imo the value of art lies in i…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 10:09 AM
2

those are hormone suppressors yeah, treatments. which will fuck up guys in other ways. First one is FDA approved and has a veeery safe side effect profile. The other ones mentioned bar bicalutamide have some studies showing efficacy and are generally considered safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 07:06 PM
1

Google says average height for washington state is 5'10". First Google result is a laughably overstated self-reported height, what is your source exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 07:03 PM
2

What is Finasteride, what is Dutasteride, what is RU-58841, what is Fluridil, what is Alfratradiol, what is Bicalutamide, what is a hair transplant?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 07:00 PM
0

Ah yes, Chad's 10+" long and 8" thick cock. This reads like comedy honestly
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 09:57 AM
2

such as in height or shoulder width or waist/hip ratio or chest or arm circumference etc. We need some citations here. The only study that I can remember of puts a 99th percentile female wrist circumference as equal to that of a 25th percentile male one
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 05:54 PM
2

Kurt Cobain was 5'9". So, average? Why is his height worth mentioning?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 05:27 PM
1

who said anything about ignoring their actions? No one. Agreed on the rest of your comment.
/r/BlackPillScience06/12/20 08:58 AM
2

We got treatments for coronavirus that are easy and affordable too X to doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 03:20 PM
1

And the treatments are a Google search away, it has never been easier and more affordable to find a solution
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 03:02 PM
5

Refreshingly good poster.
/r/BlackPillScience04/12/20 03:16 PM
3

Funny thing is in Eastern Europe the crazy hair colours like baby blue are considered an auntie thing
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 05:08 AM
1

It's not about suddenly being attractive IRL when looking like Quasimodo on camera. It's about squeezing every "point" out of the picture so you move up the spectrum of average.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 04:52 AM
1

One study found that women gave height the fifth highest rating out of 21 traits for how desirable it is in their ideal mate This point is kind of moot in the context of the OP study. Why does it matter what women rate as attractive (what they say) when they "ignore" that same trait when choosing a partner (what they do).
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/20 10:05 PM
3

Severe cystic acne?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:26 AM
2

Recessed chins, disproportionate large noses Those two are poor examples imo because they're not really dimorphic like height/boob size. A better choice would be something like a very prominent browridge in women or a prominent chin (witch-like face), both features that are generally good on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:15 PM
1

Hell, even compared to average men. In what - SMV, RMV, predicted income?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:10 PM
1

Fix your bad features as much as you can
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 10:13 AM
3

just lol at thinking twenty-something couples in LTRS don't have regular sex
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 11:52 AM
7

Ah, forgot we are still hunter gatherers. Poor impulse control = bad genes for impulse control = adverse consequences in the context of a modern society. You're regularly spouting bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 06:42 PM
5

Being overweight doesn't point to the best genes either. Impulse control, metabolism etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 06:35 PM
2

Everything matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 06:17 PM
1

calcsd
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 05:59 PM
6

tall muscular men with overweight and obese women as a regular coupling. I don't think I have ever seen that IRL, only examples posted online. It makes sense that in most couples both partners are going to be average due to the absolute amount of people in this looks-range. Not only that, but ime couples are even closer to each other - 45th percentile woman with a 65 percentile man, or vice versa, a difference that isn't going to be obvious without profoundly analyzing their facial features. Pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 05:54 PM
2

RIP Dead
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 07:28 PM
1

Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 06:11 PM
2

Are you in medicine? Yes, but I'm from across the pond. And yeah, when people hear surgery they image one would come out looking like the Bogdanoffs, because they only have soft tissue manipulation in mind. In reality, osteotomies are the real deal when it comes to cheating genetics. Best of luck on your path.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 08:51 AM
1

Lol. Do you wanna go into max-fac?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 05:08 AM
4

Even pics are not enough for reddits resident maxillo-facial surgeons. Gonna post cephalograms next time to prove my point lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 08:36 PM
1

she looks the same in movement - https://www.instagram.com/p/BvEqHmzj-Cs/, but yah make up and staged lighting, whatever you say
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 07:42 PM
1

I don't find her attractive at all well, you'd be in the minority. a picture of her face would be undoubtedly rated as top tier in a controlled setting. she's caked in make up she has a ton of candid pics with barely any makeup and is still 99th percentile. facial features like that are independent of makeup.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 07:23 PM
3

prime Adriana Lima who is another example of a woman dating waaaaaaaay below her league - this and this
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 07:19 PM
3

The one and only gay alien lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 07:08 PM
3

https://www.instagram.com/p/B6dtMGoDDTp/ - something along those lines. Funnily, I think her bf is considerably worse looking than her, which is no surprise given that looks like that are 1 in 100 000.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 06:59 PM
3

It's bound to happen when looking at the top 0.01% of either gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 06:46 PM
6

Bateman's girlfriend is undoubtedly below him in terms of physical attractiveness/aesthetics. It doesn't take an incel to spot that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 06:45 PM
1

Fetal alcohol syndrome
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 04:26 PM
1

Well dutasteride does the job at maintaining for ~10 years in above 95% of the cases. Combine that with something to antagonize the androgen receptor, transplant and microneedling if needed, and even the most aggressive of cases can be saved. Hell, people with good donor areas don't even need medication to come back from cue ball status.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 03:05 PM
2

Adam Driver has something attractive about him that I can’t explain. He's really dimorphic - good facial bone mass, tall, thicc frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 11:21 AM
1

No cure, but we have nigh perfect treatments, albeit with some rare side effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 10:36 AM
1

Perceived safety and actual chance of something happening are two different things, like the fear of flights. I can see how someone could be afraid of going to a stranger's house for a date even though statistics would say it's safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 10:07 AM
1

(Plastic) surgery is more extreme than weightlifting, but it is necessary for some people who missed the genetic jackpot by a mile. Their maximum is not enough so the next logical step is to move the bar higher. Also, most of the procedures implemented with aesthetics as an end goal are very very safe. I never understood why everyone perceives people who go the surgery route as some hyper-insecure mess. In my eyes it's just simple problem solving - traits x and y are holding me back and there is…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 09:22 AM
0

I already explained that putting it into quotations wasn't meant as a way to challenge the validity of the saying. I don't see how surgery is a cop out, you recognize a problem and solve it, nobody's talking about braveness either. The fact that it takes little effort makes it all the more practical.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 11:07 PM
5

It changes your phenotype though, who cares about the genes when the packaging is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 10:32 PM
0

Idk why this is in quotations I have a habit of putting the way people call something in quotations. Might be wrong, but I'm not a native speaker so cut me some slack. Also the fact that men are less willing to spend thousands of dollars superficially is evidence that they are less neurotic In most cases, probably. Although, we have studies on the importance of certain male facial features on physical attractiveness so if one could practically achieve an objectively better looking face I'd say w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 06:30 PM
13

Always love reading how women, the "more neurotic gender", pull the trigger on surgery so much easier than us guys, while we find infinite excuses for not going under the knife. You had a problem, faced it and resolved it, making you way more masculine in this context than whiny cunts that only like to point fingers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 05:45 PM
2

Same and the one instance where there were suspicions on a guy, he got beaten to a pulp by the brother of the girl. That said, it also amazes me how seemingly inert Americans seem to be in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 10:07 AM
1

All of those are kind of vague, is it a know-it-when-you-see-it thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 07:09 PM
2

How do you quantify "strong"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 06:26 PM
1

where else is it socially acceptable to actually approach a woman? Where would you ever 'hang out' with women? You meet trough friends, go to a party together and hook up there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 01:35 PM
4

What exactly can a 5’4 Indian man in Europe offer tough position to be in - either expatting or LL to average-ish height, especially considering the guy is blackpilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 06:04 PM
2

Agreed on the tretinoin but in my mind it's somewhat of a "next level" substance and I don't think of it when speaking about a skincare routine since its prescription only. Also, most men simply don't know about such therapeutic possibilities and I wouldn't call that laziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:44 PM
2

It's 2 inches below average where I live, so the equivalent is a 5'7.5 guy in the US, which most agree is borderline short. Same scenario, but replace the 6'2 guy with a ~6'1 one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 12:25 PM
1

Um...yes. Sebum is the main culprit behind blackheads and androgens increase its production. Most men, skin routine or not, are going to have more blackheads than a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 10:47 AM
1

OP is a guy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 07:00 AM
1

Women generally have better skin due to physiological differences, but skin quality is just one small part of the attractiveness equation. I can easily reverse the proposition, for example with the angularity of a face.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 06:54 AM
0

Being 6'+ and not ugly mean you can have the personality and the charisma of and chair and still get laid and relationship easily you will never have to "work for it" Uggo 6'2 gets blown out by a top tier face 5'9 guy CMV
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 12:23 AM
2

I remember reading something connecting higher exposure to androgens in-utero, which is also correlated with facial attractiveness, and homosexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 01:15 PM
1

Aren't we in a debate sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 12:35 PM
1

I don't have to think of it in any way since I'm early 20s with an early 20s gf
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 11:32 AM
8

Your "rule" has shit wording as proven by the example above. Even if you're going for the top 1% of 36 year olds, you'd still be working with roughly 50 women in a place with 1 000 000 inhabitants. And I'm sure that a 95th percentile 36 year old woman will give a 50th percentile 20 years old one a good battle in terms of attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 04:06 PM
4

there just isn't. yeah sure
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 03:56 PM
3

he’ll end up cursing any kids to the same fate. Thank God for genetic recombination.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 11:32 AM
1

That's good and I'm happy that you have this mentality towards it. I just like to let people know about the therapeutic possibilities so that they can make an informed decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 12:45 AM
2

It is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 12:43 AM
1

my hairline is receding /r/tressless
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 12:16 AM
3

Pay an orthopedic surgeon to break and subsequently elongate your femur. It's that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 12:10 AM
1

Delusional take.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 11:38 PM
1

Fair, I misunderstood your OP as a position you hold and that's why I tried to challenge it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:46 PM
1

I'd say I disagree, face is king imo and can rendered useless only by height and probably extremely poor frame, definitely not by wrist circumference.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 07:01 PM
1

I think people don't appreciate the distinction between aesthetically pleasing and fuckable. so a thin wristed, narrow shouldered guy with 99.9th percentile face in aesthetics isn't fuckable? (given average height)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 10:57 AM
2

Rare exceptions like Freddie Ljungberg look better clean shaven.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 11:44 PM
1

Wait, a 125 WAIS is easily at or after the point of diminishing returns.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 03:36 PM
2

You don't need "healthy" alternatives that are expensive, rather lower calorie alternatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 01:46 PM
3

Most men, even ugly men, can get a girlfriend. Most men cannot have regular casual sex. if you can get in a relationship rather quickly and easily, what's preventing you from dumping partners after a week or two and going for another one, effectively achieving casual sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 01:24 PM
1

Success has a decently strong genetic component as well - IQ, neurotransmitter "activity" etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 12:26 PM
0

Everything in the human body has a genetic component to it lol. The important things is how much do genes account for the variation and, in the case of SWR, unless you're somehow in the 90th percentile for pelvis width and 10th percentile for clavicle length, you can do a pretty good job at minimizing the influence of genetics on the end result. Low BF% with maxxed out delts and lats is always going to a admirable ratio. And Chestbrah may have a passable face now, after a jaw implant, but he was…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 10:16 AM
2

but to women being fit doesn't actually increase your smv much if we only had studies showing how important Shoulder-to-Waist-Ratio is for physical attraction or Tinder experiments with buff uggos like Chestbrah, if only...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 03:38 PM
1

All a man can do is fix skin issues, get lean, and build a bit of muscle. You can get leg lengthening, you can get a hair transplant, you can practically re-arrange your facial bone structure. It's not about what CAN be done, rather what are you WILLING to go trough.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 11:53 PM
1

You're thinking of plastic surgery here and I would agree that it is mostly insufficient. What "ugly" people need are osteotomies, which physically alter the shape and position of bones. This is a very wide topic and I'm not going delve deeper, but leaving this example of maxillo-facial surgery to speak for itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 11:13 PM
1

the important stuff is pre-determined and genetic Not true, money is the only limiting factor (and fear, probably) 99.9% of the times. Practically everyone can surgery their way to the 50th percentile.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 10:57 PM
1

It's not enough to get a haircut, blackpillers need to OBSESSS with what makes someone good looking and research skincare products, fashion, hairstyles, and gym routines to get as attractive as possible. They need to share before and after photos of men who went from ugly to average or goodlooking. There is a sub-crowd that does that, mostly resorting to maxillo-facial surgery. And it works for a majority that are adamant enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 10:55 PM
1

I'm a man, I value humor in a partner (who doesn't), I'd go for a humorous woman all other things equal, thus I'd have "a better time" choosing college graduates for the reasons explained in my previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 08:09 PM
1

So one would have a better chance of finding an intelligent woman if they were to consider only women with (certain) degrees. IQ itself correlates with humor competence, which is why I agree with reluctantly_red.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 06:40 PM
1

It is correlated in many degrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 05:13 PM
1

Wait, why wouldn't a Chad go for a woman with similar interests given the fact he has the luxury of doing so?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 05:11 PM
1

Anglo men have a really high ceiling for looks e.g. Tyson Ballou, Cavill, Christian Arno etc
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 05:54 PM
2

Eh, not like the majority of us guys hobbies aren't limited to sports, cars and tech/video games
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:48 AM
4

The guys I know who actually train seriously or have competed are usually pretty chill, either because they know shit can go badly easily or because they have nothing to prove and know it Yeah, same experience. Fighting on the street is one of the dumbest decisions one can make and training combat sports makes you realise it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 09:08 PM
2

What a mogger, I'm in utter disbelief
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 09:07 PM
0

Yea, you could've blasted HGH and AIs in puberty
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/20 09:34 PM
1

A 5’2 man can looksmax and still not pull. So it’s pointless for a subsection of men He can get 6 inches of LL and start pulling.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 05:07 PM
1

As in looks matter - no. As in looks are the only thing that matters - absolutely yes and even the hardcore lookism bunch agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 09:58 AM
0

Refer to the top comment for some, might link one that concludes physical/facial attractiveness does not positively correlate with subjective happiness if I cba later.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 09:57 AM
3

correlation between masculine facial features and penis size disproved.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 10:48 AM
1

Over for <8PSLs
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 09:53 PM
1

Redpillers have you on a leash
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 09:50 PM
1

Lachowski and Barrett preparing the rope as they read the 7" wrist requirement lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 08:49 AM
2

Abstinence from porn sure isn't helping you with navigating websites.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 03:18 AM
2

Past a certain looks point all the game you'd need is knowing how to type "wanna bang" to your tinder matches.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/20 10:05 PM
1

It's mostly being proactive when taking a kick, that is - flexing your thigh muscles with low kicks, blocking middle kicks with a hand/leaning toward the kick to lessen its strength and not getting hit by high kicks lol. Also, bulletproof shins from kicking wooden pads.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 03:36 PM
2

Lol, proving a point using 99.99th percentilers as example
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 07:49 AM
1

Eh, those complications are blown waaaay out of proportion but to each their own
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:19 AM
1

6. Get leg lengthening surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 09:41 AM
0

Yeah nah, X chromosome genes contribute to balding as well and are even considered to be somewhat more important. Women selecting for men with full heads of hair won't really fix that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 06:19 PM
1

Common misconception, people mostly don't consciously notice the subtle changes brought by such surgery, they just contribute them to weight loss for example. An exception would be a hair transplant, but there are ways to hide that as well. At the end of the day defeatists are losing by default so...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 05:32 PM
1

They don't tattoo "HAD JAW SURGERY" on your forehead when you leave the hospital lol. You do it then keep it to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 04:29 PM
0

Nah, I agree that working out is THE thing to do when it comes to improving your physical appearance, it's just that I often see guys struggling to "accept" a flaw, thinking there is no way to change it when there actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 02:51 PM
1

FFM is not necessarily muscle, peep the strength gains between test/no-exercise and placebo/exercise. This study is infamous for being somewhat misquoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 02:21 PM
0

Other stuff might matter as well but is a lot less actionable because it can't be changed. That's not true and thus is poor advice. A recessed jaw/chin CAN be fixed, a hooked nose CAN be fixed, flat cheekbones CAN be fixed, balding CAN be fixed. Expensive and time-consuming, sure, but not unchangeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 01:37 PM
0

But it's about 30% of men who can't get laid. or aren't actively trying to. my best looking mates go trough phases where they just don't prioritize getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 05:53 PM
1

You have things reversed, lacking social skills and emotional intelligence is the result of being isolated and shunned. Doubt, especially considering we know how much of ones personality is genetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 05:40 PM
1

Do you really think being a good wrestler in a country where wrestling is a national sport makes you stand out? How was he exceptional before his Olympic success?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 12:45 PM
2

You're lying to yourself if you think a guy like Sadulaev was incel before the Olympic gold medal.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 10:15 AM
1

In the US a best of 5 randoms physique would probably be a slightly toned body lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:30 PM
1

Thats what Melanotan is for.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/20 12:15 PM
1

DHT is useless, 5AR we're not so sure about given its importance in neurosteroid synthetic
/r/TheRedPill02/04/20 12:00 PM
1

You either have those things or you don't. Nah, they are definitely changeable, just expensive
/r/TheRedPill02/04/20 11:57 AM
1

BJJ is a poor example because the rules prevent the man from using his full force - he can't strike, can't slam etc. In a no-rules confrontation an untrained 60kg man would kill a trained 60kg woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:42 AM
1

You're getting baited
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:12 AM
1

the exact same build as Jon Hamm Who doesn't have a particularly big frame either? OTOH Harrison Ford is a good example of a naturally big build.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 10:59 AM
1

The question is why do you need an exact measurement of your BF%, its just pretty useless information. If you really wanted to have a number out of curiosity, you should go for the cheapest method for a baseline and then repeat it to track progress. Whether its completely accurate I find irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 06:39 AM
1

Why do you need a "scientific" measurement though? Eyeballing is enough to track progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/20 11:22 PM
3

Its just that young guys naturally have more prettyboy characteristics, young women are just mainly attracted to guys around their own age.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 08:21 AM
1

Getting to average height allows you to fraud a couple more inches with shoes and you'd be basically 6 feet. But yeah, I see how LL is so impractical that it stops being an option. GL with your facial surgery, make sure to DYOR so that you don't go for some meme procedure like a rhinoplasty.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 08:21 AM
-1

Leg lengthening is always an option
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 11:28 PM
2

Your daughters are gonna hate you when they end up at 1.85+. Height eugenic gymnastics only benefit male offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 12:19 AM
1

Top tier looks guys definitely do because they can
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 06:31 AM
0

You flip burgers in McDonald's for money, and you're not hardwired to do so. Humans are sentient though. Everything animals do is hard-wired.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 06:29 AM
1

Sure, thats why Angelina Jolie carries the mutated BRCA gene and famous playboy Muggy Mike from Love Island had a neurochemistry so shit that he killed himself at 25. You're talking out of your ass and you're not even good at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 11:19 PM
1

I really dont want to go all out on this point because the hole is mega deep so Im gonna keep it short. First of all, there is no evidence that good looking people create good looking kids (check DiCaprios parents or any male models really), its called a genetic lottery for a reason. There are only some traits that you could "plan" for such as height, eye color, hair color. Facial attractiveness is not one of them as its incredibly complex. Second, there are many genetic "defects" that can't be …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 11:11 PM
1

Plus equating good looks to genetically elite is fucking laughable
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 10:58 PM
1

False equivalency. nah, your point is just shit. the brain having to trick you =/= the object that causes the release of happy chemicals is devoid of value hence the example with food.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 09:47 PM
1

If women were worth something to you, why does your body have to drug you to convince you to be with them? if food was worth something to you, why does your body have to drug you to convince you to eat it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 03:39 PM
1

So fuckin what if he gets "emotionally assraped"? He will get up and keep moving forward. OP, dont be a neurotic bitch, dont overthink so much, there is almost nothing on the line. Sit back and enjoy it.
/r/askTRP22/09/19 04:09 PM
1

Politicians steal all the time so I will steal as well.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/19 02:59 PM
2

Holy shit the levels of neuroticism here are off the charts sometimes.
/r/askTRP12/09/19 07:13 AM
2

If you want empirical evidence - yeah, but not by much. Personality is largely inherited and pretty much set in stone by the time you are in, say, puberty. What you can do is move from one side of the spectrum slightly towards the centre, going from 95th to 65th percentile, it takes time and a lot of effort. What you most likely can not accomplish is going from 99th to 3rd percentile in a given trait.
/r/askTRP19/07/19 10:52 PM
1

There is, its called plastic surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 11:17 PM
1

What about one with insane hacking skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 10:18 PM
1

Adriana Lima dated a short-ish ginger turkish physiotherapist
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:29 PM
1

Come on, that's kinda oversimplifying it. Your brain would rather put you through eternal suffering than off itself. Does that mean that eternal suffering is the better choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 10:30 PM
1

That's a predominantly "western" white thing. There are other significantly big white countries that do not share those ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 07:29 AM
1

Isn't the baby 50% his DNA, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 07:23 AM
2

What we called nurture is researched in the field of epigenetics now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:17 AM
2

And autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 03:01 PM
1

Do you know that body somatotypes were first described by a psychologist and have since been heavily criticised as outdated and quackery?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 06:57 AM
1

What about genes for diseases of "younger" age like Lynch syndrome. Would you have children with a person who is known to have such a mutation? Judging "genetic quality" by physical appearance is utter BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:36 PM
3

not only that but theres nothing LESS shallow than looks, thats your genes on display Funny how Angelina Jolies genome is so faulty that she would most likely be dead by forty-something if not for modern medicine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 08:37 AM
2

I guess it depends on what you desire at this point. If you'd like to be attractive to women based purely on your physical appearance, that sounds like mild narcissism. If you want to be sexually successful, you will approach 100s of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 07:33 AM
2

Do you know any good looking guys that don't work on their bodies in some way or form?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 07:20 AM
1

It is a biological advantage, not a character flaw.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 07:20 AM
2

Lol @ 18 year old man. You're a boy at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/19 10:44 PM
1

She does have a strong jawline and so does this girl. My point is that slightly masculine features are attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 06:39 PM
2

Yea, thanks for telling me what I, as a male, find attractive. 10/10 men will tell you that this is beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 05:49 PM
2

Doutzen Kroes, Sara Sampaio, Heidi Klum, Gisele Buendchen all have rather manly jaws and are considered having top tier aesthetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 03:11 PM
1

No u
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 09:02 AM
4

Because as producers know, nobody has ever once willingly watched a man with a six inch penis have sex, which is why such films have not been produced at any point in the last 20 years. Ah, the camera shenanigans are working. You'd be surprised how many porn actors are around 6/6.5 inches.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 08:58 AM
2

They're all lantern jawed That's key to facial aesthetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 08:39 AM
1

What is him then? Did he play a role in achieving his status, for example?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 01:35 AM
1

Does a handsome aspie have good genes?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 10:08 PM
2

Nah, genetic recombination is a bitch. Pretty parents =/= pretty kids
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 10:14 PM
1

Do you agree with studies pointing to the blackpill?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 09:09 PM
1

I'd guess it's because steroids are commonly associated with meatheads and there are a few more misconceptions about them being spread by the media.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 09:43 PM
1

Yeah I'm the looksmaxing overlord.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 12:46 PM
1

Yeah, I agree that height can be a significant obstacle and unfortunately there is no realistic way to change it. Still, if a 5'7 guy has as much success as a 6'0 guy, I don't think 5'6 or even 5'5 is game over. Joe Rogan had a transplant 20 years ago, they are significantly better now. You can have okayish hair even if you were slick bald. And don't get me started on finasteride, hormones and sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 09:34 AM
1

5'7 and above report pretty much the same number of sexual partners. You have plastic surgery for any major facial flaws and medication and hair transplants for the hairline.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 08:59 AM
1

Top 0.000001% guy does not make a good example.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 07:55 AM
2

Or what men think about most women
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 06:17 AM
1

I feel that by "need for sex" he means "need for validation"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 04:38 AM
1

Prostitutes are mostly used by married men from what I've seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 04:37 AM
6

More than 80% of males reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:42 AM
1

"The wider community" wouldn't ever be presented with such an out of context example. Pointless question and pointless assumptions on your side.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:06 PM
3

Could that be (partly) because of jealousy?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:03 PM
2

Do you believe IQ is a good measurement of how "smart" a person is?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:00 PM
1

Where I'm from the stereotypical bitchy and argumentative girl is usually dumb as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 09:57 PM
3

Recently, researchers at UCLA and Cal State LA published a report showing that 84 percent of women feel “very satisfied” with their man’s penis size. Considering 7 inches is extremely rare and another study I've read that women prefer ~6.something inches for a ONS, your statement sounds BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 10:14 PM
3

It's definitely a stretch to attribute a persons whole attitude to a single hormone.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 10:24 PM
2

The risk of genetic disorders increases significantly with age, especially after 33-34.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 07:50 AM
3

But at 35 the chance of having a baby with a birth defect of some sort is more than quadrupled when compared to a 25 years old mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 07:45 AM
1

How is it in the states?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 03:39 PM
3

"extremely beautiful" implies that they are not everywhere. Being "the most" at anything means you are rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 03:25 PM
1

The women I'm talking about are Eastern European.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 03:10 PM
1

Or maybe because I don't think slightly above average women are extremely beautiful. Not hot. Not sexy. Beautiful. Out of 4-5 very very very pretty women I know, 2 are rather big names in the movie industry and 2 are not full time models, but have done modelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 02:22 PM
1

Extremely beautiful as in extremely aesthetically pleasing - the usual suspects e.g. Lima, Shayk, Megan Fox etc. Take Lima, for example, her features are 0.0001%. Not only she does not have major defects, but all of her features are top tier.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 02:15 PM
3

Huh? Every woman that is considered "extremely beautiful" that I can think of is a model or an actress. Talking strictly aesthetics here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 11:41 AM
2

Is just wanting to spend money not a good reason to spend money?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 09:22 AM
3

60k Euros is pretty decent in most of Western Europe. €120k is pushing surgeon salary.
/r/askTRP26/02/19 01:50 AM
1

Let's imagine that what this study claims is absolutely true - women prefer bigger, better built guys 10/10 times. Why is that a bad thing, even if we consider that the bigger guys are on juice?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 09:18 PM
1

Yeah, basically everyone who is an "instagram fitness model" is or was on some sort of juice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 09:16 PM
1

This is where scientific articles come in handy. They trump anecdotes any day of the week in my book.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 09:15 PM
1

Nah, nah, nah, I meant lookism dot net.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 11:09 AM
2

Take this argument to lookism lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 10:53 AM
5

Take a look at that
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:47 AM
12

18-25 girls are into pretty, youthful guys. 25+ women are into more masculine looking men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:38 AM
1

Thought about it twice and I'm wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 08:40 PM
1

In terms of QoL, probably not that huge of a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 08:28 PM
2

Ah, the classic genetic determinism argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 01:47 PM
1

I asked you last time - you didn't answer, gonna try again - was this study controlled for ethnicity?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 10:44 PM
1

Ever had a dream like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 02:02 PM
2

As if we do not have several treatment options for AGA. And even if we take balding as a "death sentence", men still continue to rack up sexual partners as they age. Oh, and 25-27 is not "early twenties".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 05:04 PM
5

Most men "hitting the wall in their early twenties" is unsupported load of bullshit projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 04:27 PM
4

Browse social media, media, anything visual and see how this world is tailored for really attractive people, trashes on the rest. It's not like we'll see a person with strabismus or with some syndrome or real handicap being the hollywood poster boy for beauty standards, cast as a lead actor or making it in the sexiest man alive magazine. Huh? That's like asking why are there no short basketball players or F1 drivers without arms. Of course beautiful people will be on posters for beauty standards…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 04:12 PM
2

Broscience galore.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 04:40 PM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 10:17 PM
2

The U.S. is not representative of the whole planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 10:11 PM
1

Yeah, lets dox strangers for the sake of an argument on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 07:24 PM
5

This is legitimately a medical problem though. Such deformity is extremely rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 07:17 PM
1

Love this guy - absolutely hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 07:12 PM
1

Keep in mind that is is mostly a NA/UK/AUS thing from what I've read. For example, no one in my fairly large friend circle does not use online dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 04:08 PM
1

Most men have an average number on their die, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 04:06 PM
1

There is still plastic surgery as an option after one has done all the things you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 01:03 PM
1

Other members have other undesirable traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 07:34 AM
5

Zero influence whatsoever.
/r/askTRP17/02/19 05:47 AM
3

Work on that, neuroticism is pretty detrimental for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 04:49 AM
1

I'd say people grow out of that mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 10:54 PM
1

What do you value, validation?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 04:05 PM
1

Go bang some 9/10 hookers then.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 03:42 PM
1

Same effort but bigger likelihood of success if you don't go for 9/10 girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 03:23 PM
3

Or you most likely have some sort of mental problem that hinders your ability to communicate with other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 03:01 PM
1

Effort-reward ratio?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 02:53 PM
2

Do you know if those studies were controlled for ethnicity by any chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 07:29 AM
1

I was unable to find any information that points to this being true. Do you happen to have any?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 08:09 PM
1

Any evidence for the claim that women have more estrogens?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 08:09 PM
1

I don't know anyone who "chases" friends. People experience stuff together and form bonds. I feel if you have this mindset that you go out and "make" friends, it's going to fail inevitably. You "make" a dish for example - you have a recipe and some steps to follow. Social circles don't work like that ime. One just has to be active in one or more spheres and they will undoubtedly get to experience friendship bonding as a result of that, given that those activities involve human interaction. And w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 04:40 PM
0

Comparing the amount of effort you put into anything with other people is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 04:04 PM
1

This sounds like "went to the gym once and tried to lift 300lbs, didn't work out so I stopped exercising altogether".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 03:36 PM
1

High standards compared to what? Other animal species? Or your idea of what standards should be like?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 07:51 AM
1

Why not focus your effort into expanding your social circle then?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 07:46 AM
4

Your self-pity is endless, huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 08:02 AM
2

Where do you get your numbers from? How are you sure that "this is not how it works"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:51 AM
3

There was a study posted here recently that showed height is a bad predictor of both number of sexual partners and reproductive success.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:41 AM
1

A theoretical person with 0 neuroticism would blame their lack of success on anything but themselves. Have you not observed such people, they seem immune to stressors.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 03:37 PM
1

Yeah, even though I'm not a big fan of explaining social dynamics with psychology, it becomes clear to me that highly neurotic guys often end up sexually frustrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 02:19 PM
2

I know it may sound cliché, but validation from a male is essential during a boys development.
/r/askTRP07/02/19 08:49 PM
0

Pretty much everyone is settling in that sense, this is just the essence of life. What matters is whether you're "happy" with your situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 06:33 AM
4

Oh, you are just patrolling around looking for offenders who use anecdotes instead of strictly empirical evidence in a sub related to human interaction. Sounds kinda ottistic to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 02:41 PM
3

Got any scientific proof then?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 02:20 PM
1

Are you for real?
/r/askTRP05/02/19 08:31 AM
10

More diagnoses does not mean that it is more common is what the other guy was trying to say.
/r/askTRP05/02/19 08:30 AM
0

It's not going to cheapen the dates, but help eliminate some based on lack of previously established compatibility in the frame of the social circle. Less dates with higher quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 11:13 AM
2

That is why it you date people from your social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 10:00 AM
2

Only Hispanic males have a better life expectancy than whites though. Blacks have a worse one, so white males are "middle of the pack".
/r/TheRedPill01/02/19 09:15 AM
1

Yes, it varies a little with most reported partners coming from males around 5'9. What's your point exactly? Edit: I'm wrong, was referring to reproductive success. On mobile atm, can cite the study later.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:54 PM
1

I'm not the same guy you have a discussion with. I don't have a theory, just pointed out why I think your example is bad. I'd say that a fit body is a prerequisite for being attractive as it greatly influences your facial aesthetics as well. Height is always a plus imo, even though studies suggest that average guys have the biggest number of sexual partners and the highest reproductive success.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:09 PM
1

Yeah great example with a guy that is not only taller, but more attractive facially. You would have to compare a picture of a chubby/out of shape 6'1 guy to a picture of him, scaled down to 5'7 without fucking his proportions up, but this time he has a fit body (Pitt in Fight Club fit)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:54 PM
2

Wrong. It has been proven that resistance training has unique and exclusive health benefits.
/r/askTRP23/01/19 07:30 AM
1

If it came naturally there would be no gyms.
/r/askTRP22/01/19 07:49 AM
2

EE and the Balkan countries are faaaaaaaaar from being feminist.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/19 11:13 AM
1

No.
/r/askTRP21/12/18 02:56 AM
2

Mentally ill patients don't seek to ruin people's lives intentionally.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/18 03:24 PM
6

Post your whole results panel over at the testosterone subreddit. They can interpret your values better.
/r/askTRP17/12/18 09:00 AM
6

Off the top of my head - you got tested later in the day, not enough (quality) sleep the night before, stress around the time of the test. Are your other results in the normal ranges?
/r/askTRP17/12/18 06:35 AM
6

Why does it bother you if you have no symptoms?
/r/askTRP17/12/18 06:08 AM
3

BPD is not an exclusively female disorder. Some studies show that it might have roughly the same prevalence in both genders.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/18 02:03 PM
1

Well it is their illness that causes them to hurt others. I hate this view that mental disorders are some made up terms used to adress scumbags in a PC way. They are not. There are physical/physiological differences in sufferers as compared to healthy individuals. There IS something wrong with them which is NOT in their control and stigmatizing them for that is not manly.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/18 01:51 PM
1

Those people are sick my man. Should all cancer patients rope themselves as well?
/r/TheRedPill16/12/18 01:42 PM
6

That's why suicide rates are through the roof, middle schoolers are taking their own lives more than ever before and a good chunk of young people, especially the "criminal young white men" are feeling demoralized and lost. Gtfoh.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/18 01:21 PM
5

Russia/EE being traditionally conservative societies.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/18 03:06 PM
1

Just to add to this - Muay Thai also has brutal clinch techniques.
/r/askTRP14/12/18 08:15 AM
1

Do you have any of the typical symptoms? If not, I'd say listen to your doc and don't hop on TRT. (for now atleast)
/r/askTRP12/12/18 02:29 PM
2

Armenia is a predominantly Christian country.
/r/askTRP11/12/18 07:55 AM
0

Sounds like nothing is over then.
/r/askTRP07/12/18 08:40 PM
2

Yeah, incels definitely support eachother.
/r/askTRP07/12/18 07:33 PM
6

Cholesterol is a main precursor for building steroid hormones, so yeah.
/r/askTRP07/12/18 09:04 AM
6

Powerlifters don't have vey aesthetic physiques.
/r/askTRP06/12/18 08:47 AM
1

Fuck you mean?
/r/askTRP03/12/18 04:33 PM
1

Work in progress.
/r/askTRP03/12/18 10:44 AM
2

Yeah, as expected, 6-7 out of those 9 things you listed are absolutely fixable, some easier than others.
/r/askTRP03/12/18 10:40 AM
1

Where would you put "invisible to women" though? What characteristics does a guy in this category have?
/r/askTRP03/12/18 09:39 AM
3

The thing with FaceandLMS and the guys on lookism, for example, is that they mostly compare both extremes of the spectrum that is the human face. Like, someone whose jawline is completely nonexistent versus a male model. In reality, such situation occurs rarely, if ever. The good thing is, there are many factors that constitute your attractiveness that you can absolutely control. Low BF% for example is a big one. Even if your face is an objective 2, there is plastic surgery. Most dudes you compe…
/r/askTRP03/12/18 09:13 AM
2

Yes, go and rot for the rest of your life.
/r/askTRP03/12/18 08:54 AM
2

Pretty much the only sexually transmitted virus you should worry about is HPV, and only 3 or 4 strains of it, because they increase risk of certain cancers. Good thing is there is a vaccine - Gardasil, that is recommended for men who have not yet contracted the virus.
/r/askTRP22/11/18 07:34 AM
1

Trying to explain everything with evo-psych is pointless. Don't go down that rabbit hole.
/r/askTRP19/11/18 08:33 AM
1

See, fungi are pesky mofos. Normally, they will just live in harmony with other microorganisms without causing any problem. However, when this balance gets thrown off for whatever reason, they quickly multiply and start bothering you. This usually happens when something in the microenvironment is changed - antibiotics that you might take orally, for example, kill off bacteria on your glans that keeps fungi at bay or a change in pH makes the area more favorable for the yeast, so they overgrow. Wh…
/r/askTRP19/11/18 08:31 AM
1

Necessary not a doctor disclaimer. Okay, your problem is not that simple it seems. You have visited multiple specialists without getting a diagnosis and that's never a good thing. For that reason, I will take the conclusion you've made that you have balanitis and give you advice based on that. Balanitis is most commonly caused by fungi/yeast. As you may know, fungi prefer a moist environment. In fact, the first recomendation when it comes to penile fungal infection, especially in circumcised men…
/r/askTRP19/11/18 03:16 AM
2

Tendon hypertrophy is possible and will affect wrist size slightly, but noticeably
/r/askTRP12/11/18 07:42 AM
1

Thinner or shorter doesn't mean that he can't bash your head in though. Sure, you can try to evaluate him quickly, but that one time you make a mistake, you're in for some trouble. For example, one of the most aggressive guys I know is also the one who looks the most innocent. Best case scenario he's a pussy and bails, but you you'll look like someone with a super fragile ego. Not worth it imo.
/r/askTRP06/11/18 08:21 PM
1

Nothing to worry about imho - most likely iron deficiency resulting in low MCV and MCH.
/r/askTRP05/11/18 09:46 PM
1

I'm not the right guy for that question, as I have zero experience with climbing. Ask some of the better guys at your bouldering place, they will likely know more.
/r/askTRP01/11/18 09:36 PM
1

Downhill biking, rock climbing, ski/snowboard during the winter to name a few. If you enjoy a more relaxed outdoor activity, I'd say hiking is a great one as well, so is volunteering at a wildlife club if such is available where you live.
/r/askTRP01/11/18 09:26 PM
2

You don't change your genes, you "influence" their expression.
/r/askTRP01/11/18 09:11 PM
2

I meant an endo for this exact issue, not bloodwork. Even if confirmed gyno, I can assure you that this shit is not a problem aesthetics wise. Anyhow, if you do not have any hormonal imbalances atm, I do not believe that you have an alternative to surgery
/r/askTRP27/10/18 10:19 PM
3

Go to an endo if you can, I'm willing to bet a tenner that this is not gyno, just your big nips.
/r/askTRP27/10/18 10:13 PM
2

Not gyno.
/r/askTRP27/10/18 10:07 PM
1

There is pathophysiology behind depression, so yes - an illness.
/r/askTRP27/10/18 08:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter