TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mitchrodee Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by mitchrodee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Who? And what's their motive? And where's the evidence? (Or are you just making false allegations?)
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:14 PM
0

Why the fuck would you choose to record your message in a noisy environment?! Idiot.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:00 AM
1

He already did that in 1997 when he admitted to his longterm affair with Shawn Thompson back in the mid 1970s. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-01-28/news/9701290339_1_ennis-cosby-jose-medina-camille-cosby
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:37 PM
1

It's just as difficult for accusers to prove guilt all these years later. The burden of proof is on the accuser, not the accused.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:32 PM
1

And how does that balance against bias in favor of their narrative by having their accusations repeated in the papers with little or no criticism? What are you talking about?! There is quite a fair amount of criticism of these women in the media. There certainly is in the comment sections of the stories published online. Is it balanced? Probably not equally. But then again, why would anyone expect it be equally balanced? (Simple yes/no polls have Cosby at 75% of Americans thinking he's guilty. Y…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:10 PM
0

Thirteen, thirty, overlap, no overlap, etc. It's irrelevant. As Cosby supporters have pointed out: the number of women doesn't matter, it's whether or not the accusations are true or false. All of the women are coming out and telling their stories publicly to the media, not to a court, a judge or a jury. Some of the women will join the civil lawsuit and will eventually tell their story under oath to a court. By having already spoken publicly to the media, Cosby's lawyers are at an advantage at p…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:54 PM
1

It's a conspiracy! We just figure out who the villain is and what their motive could be. http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/08/showbiz/feat-phylicia-rashad-bill-cosby-conspiracy/ Or he could have somnophilia. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/12/10/is-bill-cosby-somnophiliac/
/r/MensRights12/01/15 03:43 PM
1

The total count stands at 30. Of the 30, 6 are represented in the case handled by Allred. Have the identities of all 13 Jane Does (who gave sworn depositions in the 2005/6 Constand case) been revealed? I don't believe so; therefore, it's impossible to provide an accurate answer to that question. One women in the suit, Beth Ferrier, was Jane Doe #5. As for your odds question, I don't think anyone can determine that. Plaintiffs don't always win, right? As for the women in-group bias question, yes;…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:19 PM
0

How about you take a little responsibility for informing yourself by doing your homework. You know how to use Google, right?
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:06 PM
1

http://www.salon.com/2015/01/10/the_plight_of_the_bitter_nerd_why_so_many_awkward_shy_guys_end_up_hating_feminism/
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:22 PM
2

Allred made that announcement on December 3. By that point about 20 women had already come forward without such a carrot. The vast majority of women are not currently suing and seeking money, they're simply wanting to be on record and to be believed. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-gloria-allred-bill-cosby-20141203-story.html
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:40 AM
1

There are a few complete lists out there. It appears to that the allegations are spread out over about a thirty year period. And they happens in various states. The women seem to be much younger than he at the time of the alleged incidents, but they all have differing backgrounds. Other than the drugging (an M.O.), I'm not seeing any other strong similarities among the women. It's not uncommon for people to default to an M.O. that works. http://www.vulture.com/m/2014/09/timeline-of-the-abuse-cha…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 02:32 AM
1

It sounds like you're somewhat inconsistent. You think in some cases due process is called for, while in other cases it's not. You think in some cases it's okay to take a person's past behavior into consideration, while in others it's not. What does my age and education have anything to do with this discussion? (Bend over and I'll provide you with my shoe size.)
/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:27 AM
1

The young woman was the adult daughter of a woman who had a longterm affair with Cosby in the mid 70s. She may very well be his daughter, but there was never any paternity test; and since she was over 18, there legally is no need for one as she is an adult and must fend for herself. I'm not excusing her actions; she committed a crime and was punished for it. The reason for linking to the article was because another Redditor (you, I believe) wanted me to back up a claim of Cosby's bad behavior, s…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:17 AM
1

Well, It sounds like you're okay that we treat pre-trial Cosby similarly to the way we treated pre-trial OJ and treat pre-trial Boston bomber guy. No playing favorites.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:50 PM
1

Remember the episode where Dr. Heathcliff Huxtable admitted under oath in court that he had a longterm affair, and secretly paid the woman over $100K in hush money behind Claire's back? Me neither. http://www.cnn.com/US/9707/15/cosby.extortion/index.html?_s=PM:US Or, how about the episode when Cliff protected his own reputation by selling out one of his daughters? Yup, didn't think so. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/11/25/report-bill-cosby-gave-tabloid-story-about-his-daughter-struggl…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:33 PM
1

I'm pointing out those two cases because they are prime examples of how even you are okay with us each determining a verdict in our own minds--and publicly voicing an opinion--before a trial begins or a jury renders a verdict. Cosby's past behaviors. He's done a lot of shitty stuff in his life. None of it illegal, but none of it would have been done by the honorable and caring man hid real-life wife and his costar TV wife both recently claimed he is. He's had numerous extramarital affairs, one b…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:29 PM
1

Do you think OJ murdered his ex-wife and her boyfriend, Ron Goldman?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:55 PM
-1

Due process is just that: a process. It's not instantaneous. It takes time. We all know who the Boston Marathon bombers are/were. They've been caught. The evidence is there for it to be an open and shut case. It's crazy that we even have to go through the motion of having a trial, right? (But we do. And I support it.) But, following your logic, we technically should be thinking that the guy is innocent because the trial hasn't ended and he hasn't been found guilty. For all we know this younger b…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:04 PM
-1

It must be frustrating for you, ya know, having to deal with everyone else around you being so stupid and all. It is extremely rare that such nice guys, like a Tom Hanks for example, ever gets caught up in accusations such as what Cosby is facing. People tend to reap what they sow. Cosby is not the wholesome America's Dad that he portrayed on TV or in his standup. The truth will eventually come out. And when it does, you'll look back and say, "Oh, yes, it was all right there. I just refused to s…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:26 PM
1

Since you refuse to be clear with making your point, we'll all just have to stab at making a guess. Mine is you think the people protesting outside the venue are destroying his career because they're repeating the accusations of the women who claim Cosby sexually assaulted and, in some cases, drugged them. Correct? Hmmm...well, that's a byproduct of the freedom of speech, which is a cornerstone of democracy. Look at all the accusations that Obama has had to endure over the past seven years: secr…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:01 PM
1

Yes, I read the article. And? You know, if you really want to overcome this problem of communicating clearly, it's going to take some effort on your part. In order to being understood, you need to state your point clearly. And, in order to do that-- you need to actually have a point!
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:25 PM
1

Except for the ones that are working comedians.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:17 PM
1

If you want to be understood, you should make your point more clearly.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:09 PM
-1

I log on to all of Reddit and participate in discussions I find of interest. I do not limit myself to particular subReddits, nor do I subscribe to any one idealology, blindly following it or its crowd. As for the accusations, they haven't been proven true or false. I'll let our legal system do its thing and accept the results. However, I think the best way to deal with false accusations is to prove them false in a court of law, and to counter sue the party that made them. But I'm also going use …
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:46 PM
3

I'm not advocating slander or libel, breaking contractual agreements, committing acts of violence, etc.; just saying that people operating in the private sector have the right to distance themselves and avoid anyone whom is accused or suspected of criminal activity. Would you support someone choosing to pull their kid from a daycare center that is facing accusations of abusing or neglecting some kids? Would you support someone who chooses to pull their investments from the control of a financial…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:24 PM
4

Innocent until proven guilty is regarding the state/government taking action, not the private sector. Heck, the venue was stuck having signed a contract before all of this broke. If the venue could have afforded to take the financial hit, they said they would've cancelled the show and taken the loss.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 06:32 PM
0

I've never had a problem with women, so I can't relate.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:04 AM
1

If there is not enough evidence, the case won't get very far. I'll leave it up to the court to decide if there's a case to try. And I'll be fine with whatever the court decides.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:42 AM
-1

There's at ton of them in the many various pro-men subreddits.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:33 AM
2

Since they make a lot of money off of Cosby when he has a hit, I suspect they want nothing but the best for him. Seriously, what executives do you think are behind taking down Cosby, and why? (Maybe they're behind the Sony hacks too.)
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:26 AM
0

Just countering the Saint Cosby image that his supporters are painting. (Kathie Lee said he came onto her, but that he respectfully accepted her rejection. She hasn't defended Cosby; just said she didn't witness anything herself.)
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:16 AM
1

1974?! Article says they want tapes from a particular night/event in 2008.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:49 PM
-3

Your attitude is that of the average rapist's.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:30 PM
0

Not as big as the all-too-common problem of unreported sexual assaults that occur.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:40 PM
-1

I suppose any video that might exist won't be of the act itself, nor containing audio of Cosby admitting to the act, so you wouldn't accept it as evidence, right? http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/01/07/bill-cosby-accuser-lawyer-lapd-should-issue-search-warrant-for-playboy-mansion/ Courts treat the testimony of witnesses that corroborates an accuser's allegations as evidence--but do you? http://www.cbsnews.com/news/lawyer-witnesses-back-bill-cosby-sex-abuse-suit/ http://www.foxnews.com/e…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:26 PM
3

Haven't you heard? Rape is not simply about sex. And yes, he could have found lots of willing partners. But he wanted them drugged to the point of being unconscious. Why I don't know, but that appears to be his m.o. Even the woman he had the long term affair with in the mid '70s said he had drugged her. http://www.aol.com/article/2014/11/26/cosby-mistress-claims-comedian-drugged-and-raped-her-fathered-daughter/20999599/
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:19 PM
4

First allegation of drugging and raping attempt was made in November 2002. http://www.vulture.com/m/2014/09/timeline-of-the-abuse-charges-against-cosby.html The "Pound Cake Speech" at the NAACP was made in May 2004. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_Cake_speech Added bonus fact to better illustrate Cosby's character: In 1997, he admitted under oath that he had a longterm affair in the mid '70s, and paid the woman off with over $100K of hush money. http://www.cnn.com/US/9707/15/cosby.extortion…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:10 AM
1

It's an example of how we logically make judgements and decisions based upon the limited facts we have. We all do it. It's not illegal or immoral. And it's a fact of life. It's also common sense. Statute of limitations has passed and he'll never face criminal charges. Just because one can't be charged of a crime does not mean that person didn't commit it, right?
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:52 AM
3

So negligent father gangsters on Welfare are behind this orchestrated plot to take down Cosby?! Hmm... sounds entirely plausible---not!
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:15 AM
1

If a number of people in town suspect your next-door neighbor of being a pedophile, yet he hasn't been formally charged and arrested due to a lack of hard evidence, you're still going to willingly leave your kids alone with him? No! Come on, be honest here. You're going to play it safe and act accordingly. And you'll warn other parents, too.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:27 AM
1

I understand that there isn't enough evidence for the state to charge and convict him of the allegations. But that is separate from the fact that we as individuals (in the private sector, not the state) have right to form an opinion, express that opinion, and act accordingly. If we don't want to buy tickets, or watch his TV shows, etc, that's our right. And if companies and advertisers don't want work with him, that's their right. And if you do, that's your right.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:14 AM
1

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/lawyer-witnesses-back-bill-cosby-sex-abuse-suit/
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:08 PM
0

Jesus, Google a few articles on the subject and read up about it before spouting off.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:45 PM
1

What damning evidence did I claim existed? There is lots of circumstantial evidence, which added up paints him in a very bad light. But there is not enough evidence to criminally charge and punish him. A civil court jury may, however, agree there is enough there's enough. Anyway, the court of public opinion isn't something any individual or body can actually control. If anything, it's Khama at work.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:34 PM
1

He doesn't need to be charged and found guilty by trial for others to have an opinion about him. That's life. We're all treated that way. Heck, if others can claim Obama is a secret Muslim from Kenya with the agenda of shredding the US Constitution and destroying America from within, then I'm entitled to the opinion that the claims made by these women are probably quite true. PS It's over 30 women now. They all must be liars, right? http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/new-cosby-accusers-emerge-tv-wife-ph…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:53 PM
1

He didn't want evidence to exist that the money had come from him. It's called deception. That fact says enough. And the fact that it's not illegal does not make it good or acceptable--and I'm sure his wife would agree. How many people within the entertainment industry who have had contact with Cosby over his fifty-year career--and I am referring to everyone: actors, directors, producers, studio executives, stagehands, personal assistants, etc.--have publicly come to his defense? Three or four? …
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:02 PM
1

She may have known him for thirty years but she said she hasn't spoken to him in the past ten, and that was at a Cosby reunion event. It doesn't sound like they're very close friends. Anyway, at the time that they were working together, she was a young child and young teen, while he was a middle-aged man. I doubt she got to see him firsthand at a night out at the Playboy mansion. As for the NBC employee, you're right, he didn't witness any drugging and raping of women. Most people doing that stu…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:56 PM
2

How old was she when the show began? How old when it ended? Again, she was a child actor and restricted to amount of hours she could work. And she likely was chaperoned on the set by a parent. Most importantly, a lot of this stuff wouldn't be caught and understood by a young child observer. However, there were a lot of adults that were around. I'd like to hear from all of the older cast members, such as Phylicia Rashad. I'd also like to hear from the many non-celebrity folks that worked behind t…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 07:43 PM
2

She was a little girl and very young woman during the years she worked with him on the show. She probably wasn't witness to the alleged acts. People who do such things don't do them openly. Anyway, as a child actor, her time on the set and her time with Cosby were both likely fairly limited.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 05:08 AM
1

I heard Camille got help writing her statement to the media from Mrs. Jerry Sandusky.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:40 AM
1

But this is where all the real men hang out, right?
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 03:19 AM
1

I was unaware of this. Over the past six years or so so, as a feminist Marxist Jew, my attention has been focused solely on doing my part to assist the Obama dictatorship destroy America from within. My attention has been elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 06:34 PM
1

Ah, yes, the ol' Wikipedia-is-biased-against-men argument.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 05:44 PM
1

I doubt it. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 04:41 PM
1

At least half?! Where did you get that statistic?
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 04:16 AM
1

Yes, settling a case does not equate to admitting guilt. However, settling the case left the public to question and wonder why Cosby didn't fight it to clear his name. It was a gamble that he took, and for about eight years it looked as if it was going to be in his favor. But recent revelations from the case lead us all to believe Cosby was hiding past transgressions. Perception is reality (from Commonsense 101). http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6230058
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:19 AM
1

There was a civil case in 2005/6 against Cosby, and he settled out of court. The DA in Philly area said that Cosby was evasive, and that he believed the woman's story; however, the DA said there wasn't enough hard evidence to charge and convict Cosby.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 03:31 AM
0

Cosby has been formerly accused of this before, in court in 2005/6. I think that the many people who gave him the benefit of doubt back are now reconsidering his innocence. And they have that right to do so, especially if they think it is in the best interest of their business. Just as people have the right to not watch a show they might find offensive, a business has the right to cancel a project (per the contract) they think might reflect badly on them. If TV Land thinks their potential audien…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:27 AM
1

Last year, the Discovery Channel was afraid that the Phil Robertson's (Duck Dynasty) comments were going to cause lots of backlash for them, so they pulled him from the show. But then the Duck Dynasty audience raised a ruckus. So they put him back on. Why? Business decision. Plain and simple. The labeling of guilty or innocent is a matter of a court of law. We as private individuals, including those that run businesses, have the right to act in our own self interest, or that of our business. I d…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 01:21 AM
1

If there's a strong likelihood of experiencing a backlash against your brand due to your company's association with something, doesn't it stand that you'd make the business decision to distance your company from that thing? There's no mystery. It was a business decision.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:17 PM
1

Does it make a difference if she was a minor at the time of the alleged incident? I'd like to think that we'd not have a statute of limitations on sexual assaulting minors.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:11 PM
1

Men get away with rape a lot more than women get away with false accusations. It's been that way for years.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:00 AM
2

Most cases, civil or criminal, tend to not rest solely on one key witness or one piece of evidence. As on most cases, this guy has something that, when pieced together with testimony of others, will allow a judge and jury to connect the dots.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:01 AM
1

You ought to read a little bit more about the story. http://time.com/3602131/bill-cosby-sexual-assault-allegations-guide/
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:39 AM
1

FYI: Cosby is not a conservative. http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2014/11/24/bill-cosby-is-an-enthusiastic-uncritical-obama-supporter/
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:30 AM
2

She falsely accused him, got him and the school charged, had lawyers smart enough to get a settlement--presumably without having any evidence, but then ended up having the table turned on herself, being charged and convicted after others were able to find a way to exonerate Banks. Does that sum it up? So, what's your point? Evil women out there falsely accuse men of rape in an attempt to gain their money? Okay, we buy that. But don't leave out the part that said women can and do get caught, and …
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:25 AM
1

He does have physical evidence: carbon copies of money orders made out to several women. One woman is one claiming Cosby was just being generous. Another was a woman, in Las Vegas, who alleges Cosby assaulted her. http://www.people.com/article/bill-cosby-paid-off-conquests-coworker-claims http://www.people.com/article/bill-cosby-paid-off-conquests-coworker-claims
/r/MensRights25/11/14 02:54 AM
1

I didn't say he was, nor did I mean to imply that he was. Were the to be a trial, he'd likely be called as a witness though, right? Hence why I referred to him as a witness.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 02:11 AM
2

There's a witness now, too. http://m.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/bill-cosby-paid-women-ex-nbc-employee-article-1.2020464
/r/MensRights24/11/14 07:59 AM
3

Well, Cos's women have a witness talking in their defense. http://m.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/bill-cosby-paid-women-ex-nbc-employee-article-1.2020464 http://www.businessinsider.com/nbc-employee-substantiates-bill-cosby-allegations-2014-11
/r/MensRights23/11/14 04:56 PM
5

Umm... The threat of extortion doesn't work if you go public and do the damage BEFORE demanding a payoff. Promoters have cancelled at least six concert dates, more are cancellations are sure to follow. Netflix has postponed the release of a special, TV Land cancelled plans to rerun his old show, and NBC dropped its plans for a brand new show. The damage has been done.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 08:00 AM
1

Rape convictions are difficult to get, and older cases lack the necessary evidence. Not all criminals are caught and prosecuted. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/11/19/prosecutor-who-declined-to-charge-bill-cosby-in-2005-i-didnt-say-that-he-didnt-commit-the-crime/ And the statute of limitations has passed for all these women. They have no way of ever bringing a lawsuit against him now. Their motive isn't monetary.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:54 AM
4

Not true. Several women did speak up, but they weren't thought to be credible. For God's sake, they were claiming Bill Cosby had drugged and raped them! Who was going to believe such a story?! Actually, at least one case was taken seriously, but the D.A. didn't think had enough evidence. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/11/19/prosecutor-who-declined-to-charge-bill-cosby-in-2005-i-didnt-say-that-he-didnt-commit-the-crime/
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:42 AM
2

I haven't heard that. Not sure she could. Everyone keeps repeating that statute of limitations has past. Does it differ by state? Does it only apply to criminal cases, and not civil suits? Edit: Everything I've read says it's too late for any of these women to sue as the statute of limitations has passed. These women do not have a financial motive.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 02:49 AM
3

I don't follow. There's nothing stopping him from sharing such information. He could share any and all details of attempted extortion if he wanted.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 02:46 AM
2

Yes, I realize that. And that's my point. This not about getting money from him, it's about getting the truth out.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 02:41 AM
5

Aside from the one woman that Cosby settled with in 2006, how many of these women have filed civil suits? None.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 09:15 PM
0

Same goes for the Discovery Channel and their decision to fire and rehire the guy from the Duck Dynasty family. By firing the bigot, they pissed off the viewers of their highest rated show. By not firing him, they risked pissing off the viewers of their shows that appealed to their LGBT viewers. It's just business. Cosby can defend himself if he chooses to do so. He has the money to hire the best lawyers. If all of these allegations are false, then they are slanderous, slander that has resulted …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:06 PM
2

It's not personal; it's a business decision. Businesses are still free to change their course of action if they think such a change is in their best interest, right?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:48 PM
1

It's her responsibility to explain to him when he asks her. Nobody is expected to read between the lines and guess what their partner's reasons why they're not interested in sex.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 10:56 PM
1

Can you afford to lose your job? Got enough saved up to hire a lawyer to defend you in a sexual harassment lawsuit? Keep us posted on how it all turns out.
/r/seduction03/03/11 05:22 AM
2

Life is not fair, and sometimes there is little or nothing that you can do about it. Is it safe of me to assume that you have a limited amount of time and money? You have to pick your battles. What do you want? And what are you willing to expend/spend/give up in order to get what you want? And how will your kid (or your relationship with your kid) be affected? Is it worth it?
/r/MensRights15/10/10 06:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter