TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mizzp Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by mizzp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Of course, it's rarely so obvious as it is socially taboo to say and professors know better. But I'm sure this study must have made the rounds here showing identical applications were rated lower when given a female name than a male name. http://m.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/14/1211286109 Most people are not malicious or consciously biased, but that doesn't mean that unconscious cultural biases aren't there.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 08:41 PM
1

i would add that nobody can say what they would to in that situation until they are actually faced with it.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:52 PM
1

What did you post that started all the comments? It sounds like they're all replying to something.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 05:09 PM
2

This is a topic that is frequently discussed. What is lacking, however is proof that this is actually happening. Often the discussion includes merely anecdotes, assumptions and statements such as yours that you "feel it is a fairly well known fact that colleges and grad schools will preferentially select women over men with similar credentials". Quotas for university admissions are illegal in the US, and affirmative action has been outlawed in many states. In reality, your lab partner will likel…
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:54 AM
2

Personally, I think it's wierd to sleep in someone else's bed and would rather have the couch anyways.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 05:57 PM
-11

No one gets the irony of posting this in a forum where men are constantly commenting on what it is like to be a woman?
/r/MensRights25/05/12 06:57 PM
1

like this?
/r/MensRights25/05/12 02:26 PM
2

A guy who worked in my building used to brag how he fathered 8 kids born on the same day.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:53 AM
1

Choosing a certain line of work is voluntary though.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:27 PM
1

It also means that is you want smart sons be sure to have them with a smart woman! More reason for guys to be more selective with who they date/marry. ;)
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:54 PM
1

And my point was that while MRAs readily and, I believe correctly apply such thinking to areas like the wage gap where women are behind, they fail to do so in areas where men are behind.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:44 AM
1

However, women are socialized to not negotiate pay and to have children and to work in easier/lower-paying fields. That's pretty much exactly what I was saying. It is choice, but that choice is heavily influenced by the society we live in, among other things, the expectation of the women being responsible for childcare and household activities. An example on the men's side is the overwhelming majority of workplace deaths. Now, no one forces men to choose dangerous jobs. That is entirely up to yo…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 04:19 AM
1

This is true. The irony is that MRAs will insist that personal choice is the only contributing factor to the aforementioned feminist complaints and dismiss any societal factors while completely ignoring the personal choice component in many of the areas where men are behind chalking it up entirely to discrimination.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:38 AM
1

Yeah, daycare is the cost everyone seems to forget about when thinking about how much a kid costs. If you want the mom to work to pay her share, she's gotta get 40 hr/week daycare which costs minimum 1.7k per month in my area for an infant and 1.5k per toddler.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 04:29 AM
6

Somebody reads maxim
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:06 PM
2

Not exactly different worlds. I hang in both.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:24 AM
4

So are abortions, and both are much cheaper than raising a child.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 02:53 AM
1

While I agree that more male teachers would be a good thing, women have been the majority of public school teachers for well over a hundred years. According to this study, at the lowest in around 1920, only 14% of educators were male. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_035.asp
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:49 PM
7

Not discounting the possibility, but do you have any evidence that they are actually given preference?
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:34 PM
1

Ignoring the headline, it's actually not a bad article. Pretty objective and sticks to the facts. Unfortunately, every scientific article posted in mainstream news needs to come with a catchy, sensational headline to get views. I doubt many would click on a link titled "Epigenetic factors link obesity in fathers and offspring". And great to see a rational reply. If feminists thew a shit fit about the findings of a scientific study like some here seem to be trying to instigate, they'd be rightly …
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:22 PM
1

While diet can affect sperm quality, daughter genetic predisposition to obesity is always from the female side of the family, while the son can have it from either the female or male side I believe. I highly doubt that all the mechanisms regarding heritability of obesity are completely elucidated. That's the great thing about science is that researchers are constantly reevaluating and adding to known theories. Here they have found an epigenetic factor that in a variable controlled study seems to…
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:06 PM
2

WTF. The rest of the comment is about wanting reform in child support/custody, alimony and the draft and THIS is what you pick on???
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:44 AM
-2

You ignored my link about preferential admittance of men, instead posting one about affirmative action for women. This would give the impression that you consider the latter to be a far bigger issue.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 05:12 AM
1

Advanced degrees. Read the title.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 04:58 AM
-5

Or you could just answer the question. How do you feel about admissions officers preferentially admitting men in order to maintain a gender balance? Do you think gender balance is important enough that such a measure is justified, or not?
/r/MensRights27/04/11 04:56 AM
-2

http://www.samjackson.org/college/2007/06/28/gender-in-college-admissions-why-women-are-often-held-to-a-higher-standard/ "Using undergraduate admissions rate data collected from more than 1,400 four-year colleges and universities that participate in the magazine's rankings, U.S. News has found that over the past 10 years many schools are maintaining their gender balance by admitting men and women at sometimes drastically different rates." http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2010/06/the_qui…
/r/MensRights27/04/11 04:50 AM
-7

So you don't mind affirmative action when it's in favor of men, only when it's in favor of women?
/r/MensRights27/04/11 04:37 AM
-7

you mean like this affirmative action?
/r/MensRights27/04/11 02:49 AM
2

Eh, tax breaks only work out if you have vastly disproportionate incomes. If they're close to equal you actually pay more than if you were both single, though I thought I heard that they removed that recently for incomes below a certain amount. And in most cases (except the really psycho brides that spend $10K on a dress) the cost of the tux and dress is fairly insignificant next to the cost of the venue+food+booze.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 04:26 PM
1

Billion dollar industry? You mean like Cosmo? I would bet that most of those sources give pretty crappy advice. In my experience boys and girls are both pretty clueless when the both start.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 10:00 PM
4

Where are you from that someone can get 9+ months full paid maternity leave? In the U.S. there is no federally mandated maternity leave, however both men and women can take up to 12 weeks unpaid leave under the FMLA. Companies may offer leave if they choose to as part of a benefits package, but that's up to the company. Some states may have additional aid, such as California, which has Paid Family Leave, which offers partial pay for up to 6 weeks (and also appears to apply to both men and women)…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:20 PM
5

Okay, so if these were MEN, we all know they would have gotten longer sentences They got LIFE sentences for a small dollar armed robbery in which no one was hurt. And they weren't even the ones holding the weapons. It doesn't get much longer sentence than that unless you're saying men would get the needle. Also, they've already served 16 years of this sentence. Armed robbery is a big deal, but 16 years is hardly just a slap on the wrist even being let out early. Incidentally, it seems according …
/r/MensRights25/02/11 04:46 PM
5

I would guess that it is largely because one is promoted by 'acceptable' Western religions/cultures and one by 'heathen' mideastern/african religions/cultures.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 10:14 PM
3

if there is anything resembling equality than alimony should either be abolished or should cut both ways All laws I've read (which granted, is only for a couple states) have been gender blind. It seems the problem is more with judge's bias or judge's influence in determining settlement amounts. Men can and do get alimony, just much fewer qualify for it or go for it than women. My cousin is currently paying alimony to her ex-husband even though they both continued working their same jobs, and nev…
/r/MensRights23/02/11 12:08 AM
3

One would at the very least assume that the author shared this view, for this degree of outrage. Writers may frequently quote people they disagree with, or even with crazy views to show what is out there.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:11 AM
0

How can you possibly say that this quote accurately reflects the attitudes 20 years ago, much less today, when the article itself does not even endorse this view?
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:06 AM
6

Your post does not make this very clear: She's able to say that and get it published in TIME, This makes it sound like you also object to it being able to publish in TIME. It is also not clear at all from your post that the quote is not from the author of the article, and that the article itself disagrees with the quote. One has to go to page 6 of the article to even find this out, which I guarantee most people on here didn't do. I didn't until I saw TatM's post. I has assumed based on the info …
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:02 AM
2

So she's significantly younger than you then? Are her parents still paying for everything? Lots of college kids treat life as a party with few responsibilities. If you want someone who respects your work ethic, maybe try a woman who has had to live on her own as a responsible adult and support herself financially, and who herself knows the value of hard work.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 02:19 AM
4

Where are you meeting these women, and what qualities made you want to date them? I am just always curious when I hear these kinds of stories, as none of the women I know are anything like this, and I can't imagine why someone would want to date someone like this. I mean, you're 30 and the woman you're dating has negligible income?? So either she's still a student, or she has no career ambition at all??? Why don't you try to date someone with a sense of responsibility and work ethic closer to yo…
/r/MensRights14/02/11 01:33 AM
0

And yet an entirely valid point. If the OP makes comments like this one above: women do not value a father's contribution to their kids. In fact the opposite: they resent it. Thats why they are so eager to cut off contact between the kid and the father during divorce. which is hugely insulting to women, it's hardly a surprise that he might get a negative reaction from posting such things in a forum for women. A woman coming in here posting sweeping negative generalizations about men would get a …
/r/MensRights14/02/11 12:20 AM
2

The point is that your wording suggests that there are different welfare programs/incentives that are particular for single men vs. single women, so we are curious as to what these differences are.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 01:24 AM
2

relevance? These also wouldn't help single females in his same situation unless you're implying that women already have welfare programs, cause all they gotta do is get themselves knocked up for some free cash. Which is pretty absurd since the long term detriment to your earning power by becoming a young single mother far outweighs any measly amount of government assistance you might get.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 01:20 AM
9

The irony of this question coming up over and over again in a subreddit entitled MEN'S RIGHTS never ceases to amaze me.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 04:26 PM
1

That's good to hear! Last time I looked into it there was a list of unpleasant side effects that were a key factor to whether guys were willing to take it or not.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 10:06 PM
1

Great! Any problems with side effects?
/r/MensRights06/02/11 09:56 PM
4

She was already rich and famous before she married him. You really think it's so unlikely that she married him for reasons other than his money. Being the highest paid model at the time, she probably could have had a lot of other options if that was really all she was after. And he was only 40 when they got married. Not so old or ugly. But if it makes you feel better you can go ahead and keep assuming that despite her own multi million dollar paychecks and their 20 year marriage, that she must b…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 02:56 AM
1

And as a sidenote, I don't think he's unattractive at all either. He has a nice rugged face and a cute smile ;)
/r/MensRights05/02/11 02:43 AM
2

You know, intelligence, ambition, creativity, passion, strong work ethic, and responsibility are very attractive character qualities. These are also qualities that tend to lead to more career success. The real question I always wonder is not why women like to 'marry up', but why men are so eager or willing to 'marry down'. Do men not also find these qualities attractive?
/r/MensRights05/02/11 02:09 AM
3

That's pretty presumptuous of you. So attractive women can't marry less attractive men unless it's all about money? By the way, being a successful supermodel she wasn't exactly lacking her own money. And they've been married over 20 years now.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 01:42 AM
6

Where does it say that there are too many misogynistic contributors? This is all I can find: Adopting openness means being “open to very difficult, high-conflict people, even misogynists,” That just says that they are open to anyone who wants to contribute. It doesn't say that there even are misogynistic contributors
/r/MensRights01/02/11 12:53 AM
18

You're right, i was about sick of it by then. That does make it a bit better. Still the entire post focuses on the women's behavior, and even the one line at the end, he seems unconcerned about his own. The old man also reserves all his criticism for the women, and doesn't seem to blame the men at all: I’m glad you two boys are smart enough to see through that mess and deal with these girls they way they deserve. Keep treating them like the rubbish they are unless you want to end up like my two …
/r/MensRights21/01/11 04:15 PM
19

Barring the one liner at the end the old man has not a word of condemnation for the men's behavior, and indeed seems to admire it. how much better it is to be a “young buck” today than it was back in his day If I were you boys, I’d fuck every last one of these little whores. If I had the unfortunate occurrence to be 31 in today’s world, I’d show those women a thing or two. They need a man to knock the shit out them and then see how independent and feisty they feel. Both of those bitches are wort…
/r/MensRights21/01/11 04:08 PM
159

Ahhh, nothing like a good ole woman-hating, slut-shaming post in the morning. Of course you'll note that while the guys are sleeping with and lying to 4 women at once, they're considered paragons of virtue, while women who act the same are labeled 2-bit whores. If they actually met a good woman, as described here, not only would she probably not want anything to do with assholes like this, they'd probably dump her for not putting out after the third date. Now I'm not big on the whole casual sex …
/r/MensRights21/01/11 03:24 PM
0

Haha. Yes, you'd be surprised (or probably not) about how little shame people have. check out the notalwaysright.com for a hilarious compilation of such encounters.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 07:28 PM
8

Didn't anyone else take a grammar class as a kid? Maybe I'm getting old, but as I learned it, masculine pronouns are conventionally used by default to refer to persons of unknown gender. Now you are starting to sound like all the feminists that got their panties in a bunch over this grammatical convention saying it was belittling women and demanded that we make grammar more pc by using awkward sounding substitutions like "he or she" "s/he" or the plural "they" any time you want to refer to a gen…
/r/MensRights12/01/11 07:26 PM
1

Wow, there must be a lot of wife beating assholes out there if every girl goes for them.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 10:25 PM
37

I don't think I've ever been on a date where all I wanted was to get the girl a good meal and that's it. Aaaaaand that's why I never let guys pay for me.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 06:35 PM
2

Date immigrants--especially girls from countries with really repressive regimes or abject poverty HAHAHA. Yeah, she'll be so happy that she actually has food on the table and no threats of violence that she'll happily cook and clean and have sex whenever I want while overlooking what a loser I am. Bonus points if she doesn't speak English, then I don't have to actually talk to her either.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 04:12 PM
5

No pharmacist can claim the right to deny me any medicines I ask for at a drug store as I can claim discrimination. Of course, if I'm underage that's different - duh. Really? I actually haven't heard this one. What is it referring to?
/r/MensRights25/08/10 04:37 AM
4

True. And the draft is a great point, and something I would like to see abolished, or turned into a community service for both genders. However, that is nowhere in his comment, and many of the things that are there are either silly (handbags, really?), extreme exaggerations, or are a fault of biology (I reproduce) so you can't exactly call it a discrimination when we don't have a choice in the matter.
/r/MensRights25/08/10 04:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter