TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mmmmph_on_reddit Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by mmmmph_on_reddit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Depends on the country. In my country you can get it described if you have low levels very easily. And I think there are a couple of legal supplements that may help.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 09:55 PM
8

And that's despite testosterone/anabolic steroids acting as an effective antidepressant.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 04:24 PM
0

It need not swing back if the system crumbles under the weight of its institutional stupidity.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 03:50 PM
20

Not an inch.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 10:21 PM
1

Sure but then we're leaving the realm of height as this is true about salary and looks as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 09:04 PM
1

Right, if you're 5'6" and built like a roided-out brickhouse (which some are) that maybe changes the equation. But what about 5'6" guys with an average or slim build?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 09:01 PM
2

Height Pumper RX This is not true as being taller than around 6ft leads progressively to more health complications in humans, small at first but getting worse and worse as you climb up the scale, meaning that pushing the limits for taller men would be strongly incentivized against (and nobody finds a 7'2" lanky guy who has to use a cane by age 45 more attractive than a 6' guy anyway) This could fairly effectively be countered by regulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 08:57 PM
1

Far right nationalist parties tend to be on the average more in favour redistributive schemes than the average political party, they just want to exclude immigrants from those redistributive politics. And not by exploiting immigrants, but by removing them entirely from society (in their eyes leaving more wealth over to be given to poor men of their own ethnic group).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 08:45 PM
1

end up single Yes that's the point. The majority of young men and women are single and childless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 08:30 PM
3

Attacking people for having different values is not a defense mechanism. It's about the closest to an offensive attitude you can. Being intolerant of other people's lifestyles and beliefs is also not abnormal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 07:59 PM
1

LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 11:31 PM
2

Good post.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 10:45 PM
-1

People are still free to use Romanesque pillars and Gotchic arches This is half true. Architecture consultant agencies and government planning departments are dominated by people with a very narrow and post-modern view on architecture. So in practice, even if more people find older styles of architecture more appealing, they don't get built [that much]. We use modern architecture because “classic” materials like clay and wood are not capable of building structures as large as most cities need to…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 10:27 PM
1

Then why do women (and men) report being less happy when questioned in studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 10:14 PM
1

Another statistical untruth. Women, and men for that matter, report being less happy than they were in the past. This correlates eirily well with the increased social dysfunction and decreased rate of relationships. These trends also don't just hold when looked at over decades, but also just looking at recent years, and especially younger people report being unhappier than in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 10:12 PM
1

Only way I see most of those women having a family is becoming single moms (serial polygamy) or sharing men (polygyny). In both cases, it probably implies a kid raising without a father and less money for the family. Single motherhood has become more common, but by in large this is not happening. And on top of that single mothers tend to have fewer children than married mothers, or divorced/separated mothers who still raise their children together with the children's father The consequence is ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 10:08 PM
0

"50% divorce rate" is a misleading statistic. That compares the number of divorces per year to the number of marriages per year, not the percentage of marriages that end in divorce. The divorce rate in terms you imagine is much lower. This is still however a symptom of a different, even more significant phenomenon. Namely, the divorce rate has reached a very high level despite the number of divorces per year actually decreasing (a decrease of over a third in the last 20 years, in fact). Why is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 10:01 PM
4

If he is correct, OP's motivation is rather uninteresting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 09:47 PM
6

Realistically a collapse scenario will not improve such prospects (i.e. the prospects of increasing the birth rate if we want to speak in brutally material terms).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 09:46 PM
7

I mean, climate change already has marginal but significant impacts on water courses and agricultural impacts, as well as economic damages from more extreme weather, and these impacts will only grow with time. But that's ONE problem. You also need to think about The collapse in birthrates OP discussed Increasing political polarization/ethnic divisions/racism etc. The coming growing oil and energy crisis Increase in war and violence (if recent trends continue) Other environmental problems like so…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 09:42 PM
1

Elder care is only somewhat of a concern but that can be solved with volunteer initiatives and more people with nursing degrees. Who's gonna pay for it? Younger people will work because they have to. Immigrants will continue to be valued members of society in the United States. You're going force them? Immigrants will continue to be valued members of society in the United States All fine and dandy, but again, not going to solve the problem. The immigrant population in the US will age almost as f…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 09:33 PM
12

This is a non-concern in practical terms, as crazy sexual acts generally are not a feature of heterosexual/straight hook-up culture. Even anal sex is uncommon in straight flings.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 09:16 PM
1

This is not true. Higher IQ is correlated with later sexual success, not less, and notably, fewer children.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 08:53 PM
1

This is such fucking bullshit. I have also been sexually harrassed, and yes it really, really sucks. But loneliness is considerably worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 07:48 PM
2

Also, if you go back say 200 years, when we lived under a supposedly much more horrible patriarchy, make-up was much less common, especially among women.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 06:23 AM
14

Our society is built 'adult women first and throw the children to the wolves if need be'.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 01:05 PM
1

Blasphemy.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 02:05 AM
2

Some of the stuff came from [Redacted] thinkers though, even if some of those lived in france.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 10:15 PM
1

Called kangaroo courts for a reason.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 12:50 PM
6

Holy based
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 01:32 PM
3

I vild be completely wrong obviously, but it would be a very slow and gradual change if I am correct.
/r/MGTOW11/04/20 12:20 AM
7

You haven't noticed the increased chinese influence over the platform?
/r/MGTOW11/04/20 12:02 AM
9

It could honest to god be a result of increased Chinese influence over the reddit platform. Appearently feminism isn't viewed so hot there, at least not in the government and the CCP.
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 10:59 PM
3

We'll see which comes first, will society collapse or will technological advancments come to the rescue? My bet is on the former.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/03/20 06:38 AM
2

Godspeed!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/20 11:30 PM
1

Yeah but come on here. Do you know what what a hymen looks like? I don't. If some 28 year old woman who has a suspicious history tells you that they're a virgin, would you believe them?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/20 10:35 PM
2

Number of particles in the universe IQ
/r/MGTOW14/03/20 07:47 AM
1

She isn't fat and the person spelled Retard wrong. Delet this.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/18 02:46 PM
2

Mine is at +4 and yours is at +5 right now :)
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:08 PM
4

Okay sorry, you're not an idiot. But a person that has done evil shit they're still worthy of moral consideration. It may still be the right thing to put them in jail and throwing away key because of the evil shit they've done. Dirtymike420 is obviously using your comment to justify to himself that we are some sort of evil nazi community, I just tried to show him that we are in fact not.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:43 AM
8

Well the Australian government literally does enforce systemic discrimination against men on the basis that they are men.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:15 AM
5

Well clearly she is a human and /u/hackersaq is an idiot for saying otherwise. The point is that she is likely a psychopath and being a psychopath should never be a get out of jail free card.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:12 AM
7

You are right, this sub is radical. Being genuinely in favour of gender equality is now a radical position directly opposed to the status quo that is in power in society. If you are against institutional sexism towards men, you are a radical.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:10 AM
1

Part 1 of 2 I don't disagree with this. Capitalism just irrationally magnifies the balance. There's absolutely no reason why people need incentives of endlessly increasing lifetimes of power in order to do anything. Capitalism is literally as logical as feudalism in its eventual manifestation. Again, this is completely wrong. Liberal democracy and regulated market capitalism is the absolute fairest economic and political system there has ever been in regards to gender equality. Women, if they ha…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 11:20 AM
1

So here your argument is just "you're stupid". Ok, good counter. You ignored my entire argument! I'll post it again so you don't miss it this time. Jesus fucking christ. What ship? Do you even actually know what NN is? The entire campaign is orchestrated by large companies who don't own infrastructure to terrorize people into thinking that the evil people who do own the physical pipes are out to get us (whoever "us" happens to be). It is absolutely a oppressor / oppressed argument. And you would…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:00 AM
0

You don't understand my analogy. And you're wrong about Net Neutrality. What ship? Do you even actually know what NN is? The entire campaign is orchestrated by large companies who don't own infrastructure to terrorize people into thinking that the evil people who do own the physical pipes are out to get us (whoever "us" happens to be). It is absolutely a oppressor / oppressed argument. And you would think that MRAs would be the first people to look closer at such arguments, tear them apart, and …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 10:03 PM
1

Here's how my already-held complex stance applies to this: Men * are arguably* oppressors * *under capitalism. ** Feminism is also inherently harmful to men under capitalism. That's wrong. Men are NOT arguably oppressors under Capitalism. and there's is no reasonable way to make that argument. The only way you can make that argument is if you accept the wrong reasoning used by collectivist (racist, sexist etc.) Marxist and Postmodernist ideology. Your view might deny that men are harmful in thes…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 09:16 PM
3

It does. The idea that men's rights activist are bad stems from the idea that all men are the oppressor and all women are the victim. This is a fundamentally illiberal idea. This entire idea of men as the oppressor and women as the victim comes from political post-modernist philosophers, which is an offshoot of Marxism. I'll tell you what does doesn't have anything to do with this: The idea of individualism, democracy and personal liberty (i.e. liberalism).
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:21 AM
5

I don't think this type of mindless nonsense belongs here.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:33 AM
3

We have two options here, try saving net neutrality, or just letting the whole ship burn. Can't blame you if you pick the latter.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:30 AM
1

Marxism.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:22 AM
3

Feminism is not women!
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:14 AM
5

She just seems like a bad person.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/17 09:14 AM
9

Even the MR movement has shitty people in it. If we judge an entire movement by it's worst actors, then what stops others from doing the same to us?
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:12 PM
14

Mods, can you please ban this type of posts so we for the love of god can actually have a productive conversation? Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:09 PM
6

Telling someone to fuck off is not an insult.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 06:56 PM
7

If you have no argument and you can only resort to insulting people, then you have nothing to contribute to the discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 06:04 PM
9

Insulting people is not a good way to have a constructive conversation. There are issues regarding men's rights and the way men are treated in society when it comes to equal treatment in court cases, criminal punishment, military service and other issues. Willfully ignoring these issues is willfully not wanting to improve our society.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:56 PM
2

If it was a guy who ran around grabbing girls' butts, should he be arrested and charged?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:49 PM
10

If you are going to have such an attitude, then you must also accept that women's rights need to be regressed back if they are not to have the same responsibilities as men. In order to have the same rights, you must have the same responsibilities. I think it's far more preferable that women are given the same rights and responsibilities as men.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:47 PM
2

Bad and sexist ideas are held by a lot of people and organizations who brand themselves as feminists. It is very clear that this does not in any way reflect all feminists. I think most feminists are not sexists. But there is a severe problem of people whom are sexists and justify their sexism by calling it feminism. My country, for example, has a feminist party, they got about 2% of the vote last election if I remember correctly. That want to do many things that are sexist and even racist. My co…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:43 PM
3

Sex outside of relationships is generally speaking a less than ideal decision to make.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:34 PM
11

Because actually wanting gender equality is just for loser virgins amarite!? Fuck off.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 05:29 PM
1

I think the best we can aim for is to try not to discriminate against people.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 12:28 PM
1

Stop this.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 12:23 PM
-1

Congratulations, you're an asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/17 07:20 AM
3

I think it is a troll account. But you can't be sure nowadays.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/17 07:09 AM
2

She's not going to get 32 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 07:38 PM
3

This is in Texas, so I doubt it has anything to do with their race.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 12:17 PM
1

The person who said Never show weakness around your woman, ever.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:15 PM
5

I have listened to some evolutionary psychologists discuss a bit about about sexual preferences in men and women, but I've never heard them say anything about this. What I'm saying is, you're going to have to provide a source for those claims you're making.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:36 PM
1

Don't pretend that it's black and white.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:32 PM
0

So then it has not been an issue, for pre-historic times. Now those results are really weird, especially since they pretty much reversed and leveled out again a few thousand years later. I'm going with the researchers' explanation, something cultural ought to have been at play.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:22 AM
1

Interestingly, they tried to remove names from CV's in Australia for people searching for a interviewing a certain job position so that the person reviewing would not know the gender of the person. When the people reviewing papers without knowing the genders, fewer women actually got the chance for an interview. When they knew the genders, more women got the chance to be interviewed. When they didn't know, fewer women did. http://ihypocrite.net/2017/07/03/gender-blindness-favors-men-again/
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:16 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:51 AM
2

I don't know what your sources are. This source: https://www.plimoth.org/sites/default/files/media/pdf/edmaterials_demographics.pdf States that child mortality (up to 16 years) during the 16th and early 17th century was as high as 60%. Twice as many could not have reproduced as the amount of people who reached adulthood. Also, evolutionarily, it doesn't make sense at all. At least if we are talking pre historic times. Basic evolutionary theory tells us that genes that make parents more likely to…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:59 AM
2

You are wrong. In fact, There is no shortage of good men at all. It's just that there is a shortage of men more well educated and higher earning than the women.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:19 AM
1

I could be wrong, but I think The majority of people never got to reproduce in the past, and I think that's because most people died before becoming adults.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:16 AM
7

I couldn't find anything just quickly using google. But OP posted these further down. I have not verified their legitimacy. https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2016/06/30/new-report-men-work-longer-hours-than-women/&refURL=https://www.google.no/&referrer=https://www.google.no/ https://afsp.org/about-suicide/suicide-statistics/ https://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/aug/29/women-in-20s-earn-more-men-same-age-study-finds
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:06 AM
2

What choices people make is always a mixture between nature and nurture. Stastistically speaking, we find psychological differences between men and women and these do account for a large part of why women and men make different career choices. Now of course, these are never universal. What choices a person make is due who they are individually. Humans are ultimately an evolutionary product of a long gone time, before civilization. We (humans) are not ideally suited for a civilized society. Psych…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:56 AM
6

No it doesn't. It favors absolutely no one. And more of the individuals who were competent were men and gender discrimination against women was not a problem, generally speaking. No need to frame this in a way where it is men vs. women.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:06 AM
4

Sources, please.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:02 AM
2

That means nothing. Marie Curie, for example, was smarter than either of us ever will be, regardless of the fact that she was a woman. People are individuals. Stop treating them like their sex defines everything about them.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:42 PM
3

There is also a biological factor. Every individual is unique. There are women who are great at STEM and there men who choose to nurses, but overall men tend to be more interested in for example STEM fields than what women are. That's not to say that there isn't a cultural/societal factor, what I'm saying is that we will expect statistical differences between men and women's career choices even when we achieve an equal society.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:38 PM
3

It's not really between men and women though, because women are not being discriminated against because they are women. It's most likely people who are bad at negotiating for wages that are being discriminated against, I think. Women overall tend (as in not all women) less good at negotiation, because they are less aggressive among other things. http://www.businessinsider.com/gender-differences-in-salary-negotiation-2013-11?r=US&IR=T&IR=T There is no evidence to suggest that women are discrimina…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:33 PM
4

Her joke wasn't even unfunny. It was a self deprecating joke as much as it was anything else. The reply added nothing of substance.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 12:37 AM
1

It is appreciated.
/r/PussyPass30/04/17 08:34 AM
18

Careful, if the nazis are crafty they might use electrolysis to make chlorine gas from their salty tears.
/r/PussyPass29/04/17 12:25 AM
4

Why bring women into this? I thought we were talking about feminists.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 12:20 AM
10

Now that I think about it, I realize that it doesn't matter.
/r/PussyPass29/04/17 12:11 AM
145

How on earth could it even happen in the first place? Please, someone, explain.
/r/PussyPass28/04/17 11:55 PM
3

I'm sure that factors in. But the thing I was referencing is the fact that the stuff being spouted in the ad and similar stuff is actually spouted by a significant and bigger than ever before number of people.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/17 11:47 PM
5

There is a reason why people assume this is not satire. Examine that reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/17 09:48 PM
7

Sounds like they have a very collectivist mindset. In my experience it is simply not possible to reason with collectivists. Their worldview allows them to dismiss anything that goes against what they already think without even considering it. Especially if it comes from a "straight white male". Simply put, the mods do not view you as a person, they view you and every other man as a single group where everyone in the group can be judged by the actions of other people in the group. "Not all men" d…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:00 AM
1

Sometimes people who are on the internet make stupid generalizing statements that are not only wrong and pointless, but also serve to harm the very cause they are trying to push.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 09:02 PM
2

Import of migrants have nothing to do with what women want and more to do with what is profitable for corporations who have paid governmental and political interests to support immigration and open-borders. That more women are in favor of this has less to do with women being stupid but more to do with that some people are stupid. Stupid people are tribalistic and collectivistic. If some influential feminist or progressivist who is bought and paid for by corporate interests decide to spew pro ope…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:46 PM
2

Adultery does not affect the legal status of custody and women will get custody by default. Try reasoning with her. If you two have a child, then maybe you can convince her to stop as not to hurt her child's future. Your child comes first. If she is not willing to make sacrifices to make sure her own child has a healthy upbringing, then so be it. You can look backwards. But when you decide to look backwards, spit on the grave of your old life. We cannot change what has already passed. But we can…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:35 PM
1

Some individuals who can also be women*
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:19 PM
2

I think he has a point. Sort of. It is very possible that there would be a much harsher reprimand if the roles had been reversed. I and many others have noticed that sometimes (not always) women will get away with doing things against men that would never hold if the roles were reversed. Tolerated would have fit better. But you cannot edit titles so it's a sort of mute point.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:18 PM
1

Someone once said two wrongs never make a right. Whoever said that, they might have a point. I think if we people get together and continuously push for this kind of behavior to become unacceptable to same or almost the same degree as it's viewed for women, I think we might be able to succeed. But we mustn't celebrate physical abuse or wished it upon someone. It's not only wrong, but it makes all of us look bad by proxy. We don't want this woman to be choked, and we should as a society be there …
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:14 PM
1

*Feminists
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:36 AM
2

It does not add up in my head why someone would do this.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 10:03 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:07 PM
1

Things aren't always as they first seem.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:02 PM
1

He'd been hanging higher than the worst of nazi war criminals.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:01 PM
3

To be more exact, we have an equality in which adults can fuck children as long as the adult is female. 'Equality'
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter