modawg Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-8	Hot Girl Stealing vs Black Guy Stealing (Social Experiment) I doubt it. This same scenario (with similar results) occurred on What Would You Do.	/r/PussyPass	13/03/16 01:20 AM
8	So, I met the "Other Man" today. As soon as I read that he was at your daughter's soccer game with your ex I was confused as to why you would call him an alpha. No alpha would be sharing responsibilities in rearing another dude's jizz droplings. He would've peaced out a loooooong time ago, i.e., the second after he busted in her gross old mom-ass.	/r/TheRedPill	25/08/14 05:11 AM
2	Father Fights Back After Being Called a Pedophile for Photographing His Daughter. (xpost r/videos) He probably could've made so much money by tracing the people who made the comments and suing them for libel. I don't think that "everyone else was doing it, too" is a defense. People want to join angry mobs? Take the angry mob to court and take their money.	/r/MensRights	24/08/14 02:59 PM
1	Girl loses her relationship with her "employed, Jewish, in his 30s and that’s pretty much ideal" man.. After she goes on a show to find a man, "dating naked". I think she/he meant the mother made the son cuckolding-receptive. Primed for cuckolding.	/r/TheRedPill	23/08/14 09:51 PM
-2	"Females can never provoke their own beatings" \| Teacher stands by as female student threatens, attacks & per-sues placid male student So, the teacher was wrong because she didn't react the way a prison guard would have?	/r/MensRights	02/08/14 11:31 PM
3	"Females can never provoke their own beatings" \| Teacher stands by as female student threatens, attacks & per-sues placid male student Or, the reacher's act of walking away could've been perceived as an opportunity (by the girl) to start pummeling the guy.	/r/MensRights	02/08/14 06:37 AM
1	"Females can never provoke their own beatings" \| Teacher stands by as female student threatens, attacks & per-sues placid male student Totally assuming that threats would have done jack shit. Realistically, the only available option was to call campus security. Sure. But that would've required the teacher to turn her back to the whole situation (to get her phone). You make it sound so black and white but you don't know what she had said before the recording (unless you have a full recording of the altercation) or what could've happened if she turned away (unless you have a crystal ball). Are you saying that she was NOT warrante…	/r/MensRights	02/08/14 05:02 AM
3	"Females can never provoke their own beatings" \| Teacher stands by as female student threatens, attacks & per-sues placid male student There were intercoms in elementary but not in my high school. Whatever the case, that whole thing escalated really quickly.	/r/MensRights	02/08/14 04:50 AM
2	"Females can never provoke their own beatings" \| Teacher stands by as female student threatens, attacks & per-sues placid male student How do you go about notifying security? Do you leave the classroom unattended to go alert security? Should you leave the students alone? Do you send another student? What if that student refuses to snitch?	/r/MensRights	02/08/14 04:42 AM
-8	"Females can never provoke their own beatings" \| Teacher stands by as female student threatens, attacks & per-sues placid male student C'mon. She's a teacher not a bouncer. We don't know whether she's trained to handle that kind of a situation or expected to know how to handle that kind of situation. They're black kids. Not inmates or wild animals. She couldn't have left nor could've she have gotten another student to leave "even for a million dollars" (an expression). Now, if Dwayne (The Rock) Johnson or Lucy Lawless (The Warrior Princess) were substituting then things might've gone a little differently. Instead, you have an i…	/r/MensRights	01/08/14 11:53 PM
1	Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidence To be fair, this isn't really the prosecution's fault. It is either the legislature's (if the charges originated as statutes) or it is an incident of common law not yet recognizing that the boy is an exception to the rule because he is a protected class. Hopefully common sense prevails throughout the trial and such an exception is carved out for the boy. I'm assuming they're both minors and within the exclusive jurisdiction of the state of Virginia. Point is that nothing absurd has yet happened.…	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 11:38 PM
1	Feminism is Destroying Marriages and Why American Women Make Shitty Wives That's so funny that I was just saying this to my gf yesterday! Feminism teaches women to be the chiefs. You can't have two chiefs in a relationship. The only way you can marry a feminist is if you're an indian (metaphorically). This is because the relationship dynamic HAS HAS HAS to be dominant and submissive. This applies even to homosexual relationships AFAIC.	/r/TheRedPill	29/05/14 04:39 PM
2	TRP could have saved this man and his victims lives. Right. That's way more likely to be the case. That version.	/r/TheRedPill	25/05/14 01:51 AM
2	TRP could have saved this man and his victims lives. That's like saying that non-violent video games would've saved the victims of Columbine. Truth is, just like video games weren't the reason for Columbine, the reluctance of women to sleep with this guy wasn't the reason for this. The real reason is that this individual was suffering from a mental defect that rendered him incapable of controlling himself. Mental insanity. Recognize this and you'll avoid so many headaches when this type of shit happens again. Because it will happen again.	/r/TheRedPill	25/05/14 12:33 AM
5	Students Accused of Rape Can Fight Back // Court OKs Suits Against University, Employees, and Female I imagine that universities want a place to resolve issues that involve violations of the student conduct code. They probably do have their own murder hearings. I wouldn't be surprised.	/r/TheRedPill	20/05/14 01:28 PM
15	Students Accused of Rape Can Fight Back // Court OKs Suits Against University, Employees, and Female Tenable? Maybe. Invulnerable? Not by a long shot. Firstly, many states have statutes that do not allow a party to disclaim their tortious conduct through contract. Second, as many universities are state run institutions they're sorta obligated to provide a little thing guaranteed by the 14th amendment called procedural due process. Impeding that by contract is such a stupidly bad idea. Again, this falls into the category of something they'd better be really careful about.	/r/TheRedPill	20/05/14 01:17 PM
101	Students Accused of Rape Can Fight Back // Court OKs Suits Against University, Employees, and Female Hi. I'm an attorney. You got it for the most part. It's more about what rights a student who has been convicted in a university court has. For starters, a university court is not a real court. Thus, you can allege that remarks made about you were defamatory. Normally, remarks made about you during a judicial proceeding are "privileged." But they're not privileged in the university court because like I fucking said (like the real judge found) a university court is not a real court. Second, everyo…	/r/TheRedPill	19/05/14 11:12 PM
1	Solange and Jay-Z: it's simply not the same if a man is hit by a woman Puhlease... Jigga doesn't see gender lines: http://youtu.be/IRy6ElxxylM	/r/MensRights	18/05/14 01:53 PM
10	4chan post discussing the difference between being a beta and being a good person Yeah. Attractive girls are ingrates. If I'm lucky enough to be able to hold the door open for them I don't. If you want my help, put on a few years and get a walker, bitch!	/r/TheRedPill	18/05/14 01:39 AM
3	What these girls did to a boy with autism is sick, and so is this feminist’s response Someone should tweet this story to Lena Dunham and add the words "This is why, smartass."	/r/MensRights	10/05/14 12:17 PM
0	[Discussion] The admins just took the most feminist subreddit and made it a default. How will this affect the quality of the site, from a RP perspective? Obviously Reddit is trying to up their female stats. The move might've even been necessary to combat the reputation created by subs like jailbait, gonewild, etc. The good thing is that them being in the spotlight will force them to change their bitchy rules. Maybe not overnight. They'll probably resist, at first. But everyone caves to the pressure.	/r/TheRedPill	08/05/14 04:08 PM
0	If a woman doesn't date short guys, that's okay because that's a preference. But if a man doesn't date obese girls, he's shallow. I'm the imbecile?! Ok, you're the fucking moron who said that women are genetically predisposed to choose men on the basis of race. Secondly, I'm not black. Third, you're running wild with your dumb ass assumptions as though I have a problem with attracting a girl. You've ignored virtually every fact I've provided and stuck to your dumb ass fiction of what you think is going on. I had a feeling this was going to be a fucking waste of time. I had feeling your responses were going to get dumber an…	/r/TheRedPill	23/04/14 06:35 AM
1	If a woman doesn't date short guys, that's okay because that's a preference. But if a man doesn't date obese girls, he's shallow. I feel like I'm running in beach sand by arguing something so basic. Treating someone adversely different due to their race is racism. There's ABSOLUTELY nothing biological about it. To be honest, I think you sound like a white guy satisfied with the racist predisposition of white women because it might help your odds with white women. Perhaps we're both wrong. Maybe we should just agree to disagree.	/r/TheRedPill	23/04/14 05:50 AM
-1	If a woman doesn't date short guys, that's okay because that's a preference. But if a man doesn't date obese girls, he's shallow. No one is saying that anyone is obligated to do anything. The KKK isn't obligated to use their right of free speech to not say positive things about minorities. It's just that when they do, it's racist. Perfectly fine. Perfectly legal. Just happens to be racist. I'm not saying they should be baked in ovens and then be given an acid bath. Just like I'm for freedom of speech I'm for the freedom to date. I'll argue for a white woman's right to say "fuck you nigger. I'm not going to let your nigger …	/r/TheRedPill	23/04/14 05:17 AM
0	If a woman doesn't date short guys, that's okay because that's a preference. But if a man doesn't date obese girls, he's shallow. Yes. It is perfectly legal to be base your dating preferences on race. No one can force another person to fuck anyone. The point is that almost every other group has grown more tolerant except for white women. Look, brah, we could argue about this until the cows come home but there's a pretty interesting documentary on Netflix called Slanted Screen that sorta makes the argument that race based romantic discrimination by white women against Asian men was artificially constructed and reinforced. Y…	/r/TheRedPill	23/04/14 02:02 AM
-1	If a woman doesn't date short guys, that's okay because that's a preference. But if a man doesn't date obese girls, he's shallow. Yeah. Those justifications are all racist. The general rule is that the face of the white woman is the new face of racism. No longer the skinny bald white guy with a SS or swastika tattoo on his hands. It's your average bouncy temperamental vapid white girl.	/r/TheRedPill	23/04/14 12:10 AM
0	If a woman doesn't date short guys, that's okay because that's a preference. But if a man doesn't date obese girls, he's shallow. The guy who runs okcupid shared a pretty interesting statistic. White women are the least likely group to date outside their race. ANY OTHER GROUP... That means that white guys, black women, etc., are more likely to date outside their race than white women. I have a problem seeing how that's not racist. AFAIC, if that stat is representative, white women are the most racist group in America. How does that rationale play out? "I simply don't prefer niggers, gooks or sand monkeys. Just a preference…	/r/TheRedPill	22/04/14 05:02 AM
3	Woman says she has HIV at first date, WhiteKnights on /r/OKCupid says guy should seriously consider her. I don't see the problem here. Any chump stupid enough to need the input of strangers on a matter such as this is deserving of this type of response. The real miracle is that this bitch disclosed that she has HIV without first trying to get his dick addicted to that juicy raw pussy. It's a miracle on 34th street, folks!	/r/TheRedPill	07/04/14 03:25 PM
2	The Web's most infamous misogynist regrets nothing Would it be cheating if the dick was attached to a really hot transsexual?	/r/TheRedPill	14/02/14 07:35 PM
3	Why it's not useful to be angry at women - brought to you by Buddha himself If Buddha said that shit to me then I'd punch him in the face. Only because it would be a great counterargument.	/r/TheRedPill	13/01/14 07:45 AM
23	Saw this in a men's restroom at my university. Glad this is being encouraged. Why the hell would you edit out the contact info? What if I wanted to give the contact info to someone who needed it? Just, wtf, man ?!?	/r/MensRights	23/09/13 06:52 PM
1	Woman pushes husband off a cliff, gets released. Well, she is presumed innocent until proven guilty.	/r/MensRights	14/09/13 02:31 AM
2	So today in class we discussed rape... my blood is still boiling from anger. Sounds you got bullied by the girl who yelled that you were stupid. You should def do something about that.	/r/MensRights	05/09/13 06:26 AM
1	$125k penalty for sisters who falsely accused uncle of sex abuse -- sometimes justice DOES get served! The girls used personal memoirs to support their claims but the memoirs were not given much weight because they did not meet the clear and cogent standard.	/r/MensRights	03/09/13 06:48 PM
3	Nascar driver Max Papis collides with another driver, wife of the driver confronts Max following the race with a full-forced smack, dislocating his jaw. Any guesses as to how news anchors reacted? You defined the requirements for battery and then said she's liable for assault and battery. Also, are you talking about tort law or criminal law? Are the requirements the same for both? Even though it's a slam dunk case, does she have any defenses? What is the result?	/r/MensRights	03/09/13 01:03 AM
1	$125k penalty for sisters who falsely accused uncle of sex abuse -- sometimes justice DOES get served! Thank you for citing the report. I read it. I thought that his argument for proving malice was very bad. I think you misread my comparison. Try reading it over.	/r/MensRights	30/08/13 07:03 AM
1	$125k penalty for sisters who falsely accused uncle of sex abuse -- sometimes justice DOES get served! 4 and 6. C'mon man.	/r/MensRights	30/08/13 07:01 AM
1	Tennessee man forced to pay child support even after court ordered DNA test proves he is not the father If you think that pounding someone's ass into submission isn't suggestive of rape then you're the one making stretches. Depriving another's ability to reject is the definition of submission and that is what the article suggests. If you don't consider that a bit rapey then, fine. Maybe connect the dots wasn't your game as a kid. I'm not even going to respond to your accusations of being blinded by my hatred of whatever because those sort of accusations are just uncalled for.	/r/MensRights	26/07/13 03:45 AM
1	Tennessee man forced to pay child support even after court ordered DNA test proves he is not the father Silly. Rape doesn't require coercion. Just a lack of effective consent. So, assuming the rape law was gender free, the prosecution would only have to prove a lack of effective consent. That means that even if there was consent, the prosecution's burden is met if it could prove that the consent was not effective. So: "I don't know...Ok" = possible for P to argue LOEC (lack of effective consent). Defendant's balls are in jury's hands. Hope you're not a black guy in the south. "(Drunk girl) I would…	/r/MensRights	26/07/13 01:46 AM
1	Tennessee man forced to pay child support even after court ordered DNA test proves he is not the father If this is a prank then why would it play into stereotypes that are so close to home? It would be like a Filipino guy (or girl) moving into a non-Filipino neighborhood, bring meat to a neighborhood BBQ and then tell everyone that it's dog. All the while laughing on the inside because Filipinos don't even do that for the most part. Yeah, it's sorta extreme but it is plausible.	/r/MensRights	26/07/13 01:26 AM
13	My girlfriend has died, and now her parents are holding my son from me indefinitely. I need advice. It appears that they're going to need that whole team because they have an uphill battle : http://www.attorneys.com/child-custody/when-can-grandparents-get-custody-of-a-grandchild/	/r/MensRights	18/05/13 10:22 AM
-1	How Rape Laws Remove the Presumption of Innocence - In Washington state, juries receive the following instruction: “The burden is on the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the sexual intercourse was consensual.” I'm shocked! Is this true? Not a violation of US constitution? Hi. To respond to your question: not a violation of due process because due process only requires that the state prove all elements beyond reasonable doubt. Thus, this burden can be met if the victim didn't provide "effective consent." Notice, there is no req that the state prove there was "no consent." Consent is still a defense. Only, the burden to prove it is on the defendant. It's not a high standard, only, mere preponderance. It's actually a very clever way to ease the prosecution's burden.…	/r/MensRights	23/11/12 08:35 AM
1	A feminist's answer to "why do women initiate more divorces". This is the mentality we're up against. Pre-marital agreements don't cover everything. We also wouldn't be able to see the same lawyer. In order to enforce a provision that denies alimony, she'd have to consult her own lawyer or take on one independently. Even so, such an agreement isn't necessary iron-clad as there are current exceptions and the legislature is always free to create future exceptions that apply retroactively (which they seem to have no problem with doing).	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 08:30 PM
2	A feminist's answer to "why do women initiate more divorces". This is the mentality we're up against. Well, considering that I said "girlfriend" and not "ex-girlfriend" not all that bad. Honestly, her response was supportive. I also explained that marital agreements with regard to transferring property usually have to be in writing. In the absence of writings, the results could be very unfair: e.g, let's say she started her own business after we married and she used her blood sweat and tears. I'd be automatically entitled to a portion of her business even though I didn't help and even, possibly,…	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 08:12 PM
18	A feminist's answer to "why do women initiate more divorces". This is the mentality we're up against. My girlfriend asked me about marriage today. I explained that I wasn't comfortable with it due to the legal risks associated with being bound by California community property law. Marriage is a terrible idea for both parties. Realistically, "will you marry me?" = "will you agree to be bound by complex and arcane rules of law to govern the remainder of our relationship; distinct from ones that we've been bound by so far; ones that we did not write nor aware of but are likely to encounter during a…	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 08:52 AM
1	FROM A FEMALE LAWYER: women are as capable as men of lying, being abusive towards others, and my personal favorite: working our legal system. You wouldn't have to have gone through all that trouble if your first sentence served as your topic sentence. The remainder of your paragraph should support the initial topic sentence. Sort of like how these following sentences are doing for my initial sentence.	/r/MensRights	14/01/11 10:01 AM