modpowertriptime Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands I just researched it. No, it's assumed to be false, she has to prove its true. It may be true that he has to prove damage was done but she's absolutely assumed to lying if he accuses her if defamatory libel. I continue to be unsure of how it works with criminal accusations.	/r/MensRights	17/09/17 08:58 PM
1	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands Holy fuck, you're actually upvoted too.	/r/MensRights	17/09/17 04:53 PM
1	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands OK, I get I wrote a confusing comment, but it's not so confusing that I should be replying to multiple people explaining it. Read what I said to the other guy. Or look up how their defamation law works. The person accused of libel is presumed guilty, and needs to prove what they said is true, or they will lose. In England you can just go around accusing people and have it hold weight, but only if you do it in court.	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 09:52 PM
3	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands In I think pretty much any other country on Earth she wouldn't. In England she does. And what's your point? You really need me to type out "convince a judge/jury" instead of prove? You really couldn't figure out what I meant?	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 09:44 PM
1	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands OK... in the system I just described the person accused of libel is presumed guilty and is required to prove their case. I edited it from "claim", which was ridiculously confusing, to "supposedly false claim" when I should have just said "being accused of lible". I assume that is where your confusion came from.	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 09:39 PM
2	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands And as I say, as I understand she has to prove it's true rather than him proving it false. There may be some sort of exception for criminal accusations though.	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 08:23 PM
-1	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands In England I believe the onus is on the person accused of libel to prove what they said is true, as fucked up as it is. Edited for clarity.	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 08:20 PM
12	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands In England, if he took her up on libel charges, she would have to prove what she said happened happened, is that correct?	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 08:06 PM