TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

moldovan0731 Archive

View 34 posts and 585 comments by moldovan0731 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
112

CMVmoldovan0731/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 01:42 PM
65

Progressmoldovan0731/r/MensRights26/08/24 03:17 AM
45

social mediamoldovan0731/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/24 01:10 PM
44

Discriminationmoldovan0731/r/MensRights06/07/24 08:46 AM
23

moldovan0731/r/MGTOW16/02/19 11:41 AM
13

moldovan0731/r/MGTOW21/03/19 03:14 PM
9

moldovan0731/r/MGTOW07/12/19 05:07 AM
8

moldovan0731/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:48 PM
8

moldovan0731/r/MGTOW21/06/19 08:40 PM
4

Generalmoldovan0731/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:05 PM
4

Generalmoldovan0731/r/MensRights08/03/21 08:57 AM
4

school/workmoldovan0731/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 08:48 AM
4

moldovan0731/r/askTRP04/03/20 03:20 AM
3

moldovan0731/r/askTRP16/02/19 12:21 PM
3

moldovan0731/r/MensRights06/01/20 01:44 PM
3

moldovan0731/r/MensRights08/01/20 10:39 AM
2

moldovan0731/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 10:45 PM
2

moldovan0731/r/AntiFeminists08/03/21 06:57 PM
1

moldovan0731/r/askTRP28/04/20 11:12 AM
1

moldovan0731/r/MGTOW18/12/19 01:22 PM
1

moldovan0731/r/MensRights19/03/20 11:32 AM
1

moldovan0731/r/MGTOW19/01/19 12:16 PM
1

moldovan0731/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:37 PM
1

moldovan0731/r/MensRights17/04/20 10:53 PM
1

moldovan0731/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 01:47 AM
1

moldovan0731/r/BlackPillScience25/11/21 01:01 PM
1

moldovan0731/r/askTRP29/01/20 11:08 PM
1

moldovan0731/r/askTRP04/03/20 04:38 AM
1

moldovan0731/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 08:58 PM
0

Debatemoldovan0731/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:19 PM
0

moldovan0731/r/MensRights01/09/20 09:58 PM
0

moldovan0731/r/askTRP12/01/20 11:20 PM
0

moldovan0731/r/askTRP07/09/19 04:29 PM
0

moldovan0731/r/askTRP18/03/20 10:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And they can always point to Shane Dawson being allowed to adapt.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/12/24 07:20 AM
2

The third point is saying the quiet part out loud
/r/EverydayMisandry21/11/24 04:13 AM
1

One that I hold. From what I've seen, at least some of these are rare beliefs here.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 10:16 PM
1

No, the only winning move is not to play at this point. The only thing that would fix our society is a taboo, so our society will die.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 02:13 PM
3

The left and the right hates men about equally, it's just that the left hates capitalist, traditional men, while the right hates non-chad, non-traditional men.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/10/24 02:10 PM
3

Yes. People/men need to see that people/women believing in stuff like this is not rare.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/08/24 05:13 PM
15

Never go full down bad
/r/MensRights06/07/24 05:30 AM
33

Like men are all just going to walk away after doing anything to women with no comsequences...
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/24 04:15 PM
-2

In a dying one.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 03:13 AM
-3

Motovation to keep going.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 02:06 AM
-9

Basically. There's no significant portion of men that get a supressed primal desire shortly after experiencing this from people/women in power though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 02:03 AM
0

The patriachy did give just enough to regular men that they wanted to keep society/civilization running though, which is more than our dying patriarchy promises/delivers in regards to young men nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:57 AM
-5

As a man, you can't be serious about saying this, unless you're a chad. Most women may rather live in mud huts than with average men, but I guarantee you most non-chad men wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:37 AM
-1

History begs to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:36 AM
-17

Most women willingly submit to whoever has the power at any given point. Men just have to take over after the collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:35 AM
0

Aka the historical norm. Men will deal with it just fine. Some poisonings won't lead to male extinction anyway, most women won't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:34 AM
-14

No, there's no asking involved. Women follow men who have the power anyway, and those men can do almost anything with said power as long as they have it. They won't happen until a collapse though, since no significant goup of men has the balls to do this now.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:32 AM
-4

"Most women would rather be sexless than have a kid with a man they don’t like." Chad's bastard kids are just as much of a meme as reality, arguably even more so; plenty of women have kids with men they settled for, even if they grow to be bitter and resentful because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:27 AM
7

"and still today there are societies which permit it and they chug along just fine" If chugging along in mud huts is "fine" to you, then sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:25 AM
3

This is some weird overlap between the Red Pill and Female Dating Strategies, a borderline self-hating one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:17 AM
3

"some women are going to think you're a 10 some will think you're a 1 that's just how it goes" You gave way too big of a range for this sentence for it to not be cope. Incels borderline wouldn't exist if some woman's 1 was another women's 10. Some woman's 7 may be another woman's 8 or 9 though, or some woman's 4 another woman's 5 or 6.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:12 AM
0

Can't believe I'm saying this, but people in Western countries care too much about being nice. Western prosperity have made people forget you need reality checks to keep you grounded.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:01 AM
2

He failed because he went to Sweden, that's like trying to cure AIDS with cancer. Doubly so if he brought her to the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:59 AM
2

"Then I realized that getting a passport and retiring early overseas off $20k/yr was much easier than becoming a multi-millionaire in USA." Based. At least you don't try to sell the ludicrous idea that men should all become millionaires as a response to women's standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 11:14 PM
1

"Even if a woman's standards are objectively too high, unreasonable, or simply impossible. If you don't meet those standards, it's just not gonna happen." This is only this way because most men don't have the balls to change it. Men could reverse the sexual revolution and dating apps if enough of them really wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 11:11 PM
3

This is basically "average women ignore that guy/average guys and only go after chads on dating apps, so only below average women are in his league", which is a huge biased gynocentric cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 11:06 PM
0

Prepare for the "average women ignore that guy and only go after chads on dating apps, so only below average women are in his league" comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 11:04 PM
2

"your own dating market; and since this generally consists of people similar to you" Dating apps have ruined this. There aren't really any isolated enough dating markets because of them anymore. Another reason why dating apps and their consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:45 PM
3

"That is progress" 🤮
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:40 PM
-1

It's a way of saying not being able to secure a chad provider and settling for a provider with average looks, while being bitter about it and a good chance of divorcing over it a few years or decades later, because the same mistakes/flaws sting 10 times more when it's a non-chad man that does/has them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 07:52 PM
-3

Let's say that's true about most men; what do you think you/women would gain from that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:54 PM
1

A BB gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:52 PM
-3

BB
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:48 PM
9

I hate how people bring up the overall population here trying to counter this. Older women grew up in a different culture with no dating apps, hookup culture and situationships, of course they're not rhat bad. Young women are becoming more and more like what OP describes every day though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:47 PM
–

Because they're only wary of non-chad men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:04 PM
1

Most women (and a significant minority of men, which is about 80% of people when you add all those men and women together) get more money in taxes than they pay in taxes, aka they're not net taxpayers but a tax drain, but sure, I will believe you just so happen to be an expection to that, all the while being on this sub no less. If you really are an expection, which I find unlikely, you being a socialist as a net taxpayer is like a pig voting for slaughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:36 PM
–

Chad can be a nice guy or an asshole, it doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:19 PM
–

When you put all those women together, it may very well look like a very big crowd, but it would still be a small portion of cases percentage-wise. Even if it's hundreds of thousands or millions of women on a contient-wide or worldwide scale, that's a small percentage of the hunderds of millions of people in a continent or the billions of people in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:16 PM
–

Even then, that's not real attraction, she may cheat on you with the pool boy and put you through the ringer in divorce, it's just that it's less likely to be life-ruining in those cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:12 PM
–

"My experience that represents a really small portion of divorces disproves what the vast majority of divorces show us"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:09 PM
0

Beacuse that evolutionary development happened in cavemen times, aka in the times when people haven't invented monogamy, the structure needed to create a developed soiety. Yeah, mostly immigrants and people who are taking western properity for granted. Once there will be enough of them, it will crumble.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:02 PM
0

"late stage capitalism" fucking hell. Giving everyone over the age of 18 the right to vote instead of restricting it to landowners or net taxpayers really was the point of no return.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:00 PM
0

Like I say then, embrace the consequences of degenerating society before it happens then and live in a mud hut early.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:56 PM
2

This is some serious "Women was hurt by asshole she chose" energy. Being attracted to a woman is disrespetful if the woman isn't attracted to the man? Also chadsexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:55 PM
1

Only post-sexual revolution, it only required one adult before it. Explains why so many of them fail nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:42 PM
0

He's a historically mentally well adjusted men. Degeneracy lime this is a historical anomaly in a society-wide scale. If you want this, embrace the eventual consequences of it and live in a mud hut.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:33 PM
1

Even if that's true, it's something people weren't meant to discover. It basically makes maintainging our developed society long-term (over centuries after discovering it) near-impossible, if not outright impossible. Our society was literally built on the invention of monogamy, not on serial monogamy, polgyny or polygamy. There's a reason most non-monogamous groups of humans still live in mud huts, unless they get assistan e from monogamous societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:28 PM
2

It's projection, it's good women that are rare, good guys aren't rare, most women just prefer hot and/or exciting men over good men even though everyone knows good men are more likely to be average looking and/or boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:03 PM
3

Average guys are more and more likely to only being able to get below average women than average women, it's just something that is only showing in young people though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 02:02 PM
2

IMAX level projection
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/24 11:03 AM
1

Only chads can do things right according to women.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/24 10:58 AM
-1

I saw someone say it's incels who think most modern movies are bad.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 05:41 PM
–

It's true, but men today don't have the balls to reinstate strict monogamy and slut shaming, so women will keep doing it even if the majority of men will eventually become NEETs because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 02:04 PM
2

There are many people making arguments here that make sense in theory, but aren't supported by historical precedent. No, people wouldn't all just cheat/create a fault, yes, there would be people trying to fix things, no, everyone wouldn't be doomed to be miserable until death.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:03 PM
3

When you know that they use words like magic spells (whatever brings the best results for them), it all starts to make sense.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 08:20 AM
2

I looked up what the 4B movement is. Says it all really.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 07:01 PM
5

Unless you're a chad, but even then, they often only care about the most superficial aspect of your being.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:38 AM
1

The energy a feminine woman can give off. Video example: https://youtu.be/3wXgF-y2hm8?si=xO_BXahgvxUe-bo1
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:02 AM
–

They're true regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:24 PM
–

I know, but AFAIK, it's becoming more common knowledge among them that you're not supposed to bring her to the country they grew up in. That probably means they'd rather have that situation than nothing. Also, another popular argument among them is that women follow whoever has the power, so women are more likely to enforce patriarchy in places where patriarchy isn't dying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:19 PM
1

I'm fine with it. People that are vehemently against it may try to justify their opinion with all sorts of reasons, but the underlying reason they hate it is because they subconsciously think of it as men bypassing what they genetically deserve.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 05:23 PM
–

Hope is increasingly painful for average and below average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 06:33 PM
–

It was only concerning to you because you're afraid some of them will harm women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 05:50 PM
–

What you were exposed to doesn't change the fact what's normal/average on a societal level. Also, what you were exposed to hurts the average man's chances then.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 05:47 PM
–

I guess you're probably talking about this: https://www.penissizedebate.com/images/doc/penis_size_preference_chart1.gif This is based on a statistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 05:43 PM
–

If some teasing amd banter has stopped you from pursuing it, you didn't belong there in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 07:59 AM
–

Women were never going to (or at the very least not fully) abandon the parts of patriarchy that were beneficial for them, only the parts that men got as a compensation for creating the parts of patriarchy that are beneficial to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 07:50 AM
–

People here keep doing it because other people here keep posting research based on self reports like you just did.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 06:07 AM
–

It's true, otherwise women wouldn't be like horny men only when chads are around, but as often as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:43 PM
7

You'd love that becuase you could always pick/get the chads that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 11:34 AM
1

"You have already made the argument that such work is not worthwhile." Again, I already said it deserves some credit, just not the same amount as what men did.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:14 PM
1

Still a bit of a cope, since who knows how much of the part about agriculture is actually science or The Science™ (aka scientism, aka presentism applied to science) in the first place, and because once agriculture became widespread, men did basically everything else to advance the human species, while women did stuff that was needed anyway but didn't advance the human species after a certain point, just maintained the basis. Even now after a hundered years of feminism, most women aren't seem to …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 06:03 PM
1

Farming was done by both men and women, though it's still not the same, because women did little to advance the human species besides that. Child rearing actually deserves a similar amount of credit to working, but it also became and it's becoming increasingly easier due to men inventing technology that has made it easier and less time consuming, thus arguably increasingly deserving less and less credit, which is arguably why women have started to rebel against the patriarchy besides feminist pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 05:53 PM
1

"Civilization was a human thing, not just something that wonderful men made all on their own and then gifted to worthless females in exchange for sexual access." Kinda true and kinda not true at the same time, yes, women have always worked in unofficial ways, but no known matriarchy, historical or present, has ever come close to what most patriarchies were able to achieve technologically. Also, yeah, we could give credit to women for motivating men, but it would be kind of meaningless at this po…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 05:43 PM
0

I did write women deserve some credit. If they want to get equal credit for something that obviously required less effort than actually building and maintaining society (motivating men to build and maintain society) though, that proves that women are spoiled, or at the very least entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 05:37 PM
2

Okay, and I'm saying that logically, women really did contribute by being major motivators, but that's not equal contribution that deserves equal credit, just some credit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 01:46 PM
1

Well, it would really sound strange to want equal credit for civilization only because of being the motivator of the creators of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 01:10 PM
-1

As in enough to not get cheated on, since she doesn't know anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 06:55 AM
3

"No woman I have ever known has had such an amazing sexual experience in the very beginning of when she starts having sex, that it leaves her in a state of wonderment." Isn't the point of the theory is that mediocre sex is enough if you're the first though, because she doesn't know anything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 06:53 AM
5

The logical side of most women (which side does in fact exists, even if it plays a smaller part in women's lives than men's lives) values Guy 2, but the emotional side makes it so that Guy 2 is never really safe and is always one really bad argument away from being cheated onnby Guy 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 06:33 AM
3

"They coincidentally never noticed the Karen meme, the landwhale meme, Onlyfans Whore memes, or when women like Kathleen Kenndy, Amber Heard, Mindy Kahling, Coleen, and that bitchy Snow White actress get massively hated by the masses." These mostly happened after men born in the 90s and 00s grew up and started to see that what they were thought isn't working, basically as a backlash.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 09:32 AM
-3

Whilw it's often weaponizedincompetence, sometimes it's just what women are capable of.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 03:42 AM
1

Disney movies show what people are already thinking. https://youtu.be/FKwfmrxDHW4?si=gl6tlMCiHR3iji7c
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 07:51 AM
–

No, everyone should just keep in their pants, men and women if they don't want to bother finding trustworthy people. More repsonsibility and accountability for everyone instead of less.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 10:50 AM
–

God bless hookers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 08:49 AM
–

I'm skeptical, I've always seen men react more positively to analogies than women instead of taking them as tools of dehumanization.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:28 AM
–

You're at least partly off about the truly desire part. It's just sexual. Men do sometimes sleep with women they consider hot, but consider their personalities to be repulsive. Women do this too, it's just different, because if the guy is good looking enough, they often don't even notice if the guy has personality traits they would consider repulsive in uglier people, while men mostly still know about them, just sometimes choose to overlook them. But I promise you, most men like the "Madonnas" m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:04 AM
–

Well, right-wing people are generally an exception to this, they talk about the symptoms way more often than about the root cause/causes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:45 PM
–

I my experience, those that genuinely care about the long term stanility of society talk about other stuff as well. You aren't obligated to only talk about the biggest stuff, especially when there's almost nothing you can do about any of it so that your society doesn't fall off a cliff by its own volition (not peacefully at least), be it big or small.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:33 PM
–

Typical average person mentality. I will admit though, the majority really are just jelouos, but thre also really is a portion that is genuinely concerned about the long-term stability of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:22 PM
–

Anything over 2, or at the absolute max 3 is still too much though. Also, it's all fun and games for people to have different preferences until one preference becomes so overwhelmingly popular that achieveing what you prefer becomes near impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:20 PM
0

The bad effects of unhappy marriages on kids are greatly overstated socialist propaganda, and the bad effect of divorce on kids are greatly understated socialist obfuscation. It's all part of the plan of socialists to destroy the family, which they want to do because they view families under capitalism as capitalism reproducing itself, because they believe in social reproduction theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 06:06 PM
1

Women can want divorce even if they don't have kids. It's children that make the difference, not men or women. People without kids want divorce, fine, people with kids want divorce, disgusting/deplorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 05:48 PM
1

If they don't have any kid, the latter, if they do, the former.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:12 AM
4

Yes, it is a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:48 AM
5

This mentality is how socialists/feminists/polyamorists win.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:46 AM
0

Did you find the Youtube channel called Manifestelle? I wouldn't be surprised to know that your inspiration for this post has at least partly came from her. Ultimately though, women like this are just more honest women than most others. They admit they only want the parts of equality that benefits them, aka not real equality. They want to embody Schrodinger's feminism, they just admit to it, unlike most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 07:52 PM
2

"guys that claim "game" matters get clowned for it by younger men" It's because game can only work if the guy using game hits at least the minimum level of physical attractiveness at which the woman he's using game on is willing to give a chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 05:35 PM
1

I'd rather pay for it and have peace, since that at least is not full of drama, and even though it won't make you happ/fulfilled, neither what you suggest will, not long term at least, and we know the thing that would actually make us content/fulfilled long-term is so hard it's near impossible thanks to our patriarchy dying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 04:05 AM
–

It's true, it's proven that man have greater variation than women. It's why AWALT became a saying. That said, even most men aren't that much more varied, you can have deep, interesting conversations with friends or with people on the internet who share interests with you, you don't need a girlfirend for that, and it's not even what a girlfriend is for.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 05:30 PM
1

It's because when attractive men get violent, it gets excused as a few bad apples, but when an unattractive man gets violent, unattractive men as a whole get treated as ticking time bombs. It's lookism.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 10:30 AM
1

I do thinkmen and women have more similar than different acpect, but I think that the few differences are so big that the similarities don't really matter some of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:59 AM
0

They will flat out tell you they despise the male gaze. That's why they're removing attractive women from media more and more often.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 12:03 PM
1

Yes, women think all of those are better than low confidence (and above all, looks). Congratulations, you've discovered why the patriarchy was created. Most women's preferences are basically anti-civilizational (are fundamentally at conflict with developed societies) except for genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 10:33 AM
–

But it's women choices that make the salaries different.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 10:23 PM
1

Because I see patriarchy as a civilization building and maintaining system, not just as a system that forces women to accept relationships with men they otherwise wouldn't accept relationships from without patriarchy like feminists/the vast majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 12:42 PM
0

https://youtu.be/sl_o0xZxn0Q?si=urjAD2n2nzGZZKzB
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 11:37 AM
3

The how you feel/felt about it part of it is the framing part.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 07:36 PM
3

Except for the "men can't control themselves" part, that's reasonable advice, since we'll never live in a world where you can do anything without opening up the potential for something bad to happen. Even then, it's still a small portion of men, who maybe really can't control themselves, but "men can't control themselves" is too generalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 07:31 PM
2

"Most of it isn't reported because, you know, "someone squeezed my butt in a crowd, no clue who it was" isn't something that can really be addressed." This degree of assault (minor compared to the worst possible kinds of assaults) shouldn't be reported either, unless you don't mind living in a police state.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 07:23 PM
25

The more posts Iike these I see, the more I realize how pointless they are. Most women would rather die than admit to what these kinds of posts are about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 07:10 PM
0

"The left does a great job in reminding those weirdoes what freedom actually is." We're not free until I can fuck 5 people daily, fuck kids, fuck animals, walk on the street in fetish/bondage gear or totally naked, until kids can get sex change operations the moment they can talk even though they know fuck all about themselves and the world and roleplay as all sorts of things all the time, until I get the same pay as the most talented person in the world, until I can go in women's bathrooms whil…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 02:01 PM
-1

"can't manage to get close enough to enjoy the scent of a vagina without imagining it in chains handed to them on a silver platter" Oh, feminism and its flovery exaggerated propaganda language. I hope you know at least the 50s (and basically all soft patriarchies) weren't like that, and most men didn't even enjoy regularly beating or raping their viwes, it was more like that what leeads to shouting nowadays sometimes lead to a slap, and it was more common for husbands to convince/nag their viwes…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 01:15 PM
-6

Cope, patriarchy has stopped this for thousands of years, and eventually will again, even if probably not in my lifetime, since feminism inevitably defeats itself, or as anti-feminists would say, it's a self-correcting problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 09:22 AM
8

"All the men in my college are anything but deprived" All the *top (aka visible to you) men in your college are anything but deprived
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 04:02 AM
1

Degeneracy is just behavior that's harmful to the long-term stability of a civilization. Of course people have always complained about it, since history works/civilizations work in rise and fall cycles. Other than providing comforts, the west is loved by people opposing degeneracy for what it used to be (e.g. being pro-negative freedom instead of pro-positive freedom, a.k.a. pro-freedom from, not pro-freedom to), not what it is now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 03:59 AM
0

Leftists always pay lip-service to this, but you never actually see them forming families like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 03:48 AM
1

Damn, I'm impressed. Very based of a woman to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 03:35 AM
1

As another person wrote it here though, it never even crossed my mind, but it's not just that women can always get sex, they can always get commitment as well, just not necessarily from the men they would like it from. Basically, some women might be lonely, but that doesn't mean they're affected by a loniless epidemic like men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 03:32 AM
3

"but implying that's the difference between screaming a bit and killing someone is implying that men are mindless animals" It's good it's not what it implies then, but the percentages of men and women choosing killing, which remains very low in both men and women even though it's higher in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 08:15 PM
2

"but I sure as hell don't see the same numbers of women turning violent on men who reject them as the alternative" Yeah, but at the end of the day, you're still comparing two very small percenteges of the population, and the difference is prpbably explained by something as simple as women having lower levels of testosterone (a much more likely explanation than women simply just being better morally, as much as women hate to hear that).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 08:00 PM
-1

It's unnatural in a bad way. Even women in prehistoric times didn't get to be as picky as women nowadays after dating apps in our dying patriarchy, even though patriarchy didn't exist at that time yet. Also a given number (probably over 50%) of men is what lead to the creation of patriarchy in the first place, since most men aren't motivated enough to contribute to society/civilization without a relationship or access to sex, so patriarchy was created to make the odds more favorable to average m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 07:52 PM
0

While there's lip service being paid to not treat ugly people badly, the search for good genes is so ingrained in human nature that some people treat ugly people badly without even noticing they're doing it, like unconcious meat puppets. Makes sense, since what we consider the greatest achievements of humanity was always done by a small portion of humans below one percent of the whole population. Most humans are only different to animals in that they can control their aggression somewhat better …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 07:20 PM
1

"There’s no reason, be it logical, emotional, or religious, to treat them like garbage." Yet people often do it anyway (based on emotional reasons).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 07:08 PM
6

Some would argue the latter would be more honest and better in a way, since they're constantly punished for being unattractive anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 07:06 PM
–

"and then desiring them at the same time" *their bodies
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 06:33 PM
–

☕
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 06:33 PM
-5

Not a new thing, that also happened when marriages lasted. It's simple, once no-fault divorce became a thing, it was inavitable that parallel to serious issues, a lot of people will also use the path of least resistance and divorce for the flimsiest of reasons, especially women. It's human nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 04:12 PM
-2

I'm already being downvoted by a bunch of nihilists
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 04:01 PM
-5

It's not children. It's the individualistic, narcissistic self-esteem culture that has made children the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 03:26 PM
–

This comment shows why women's opinion are irrelevant; always a teenager in mind, drinking the feminist the Kool-Aid that there's just as much of a variation between women as between men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 02:48 PM
–

Men are attracted to way more women than women are to men. Most of us don't think we're hot shit that deserve only the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 02:44 PM
1

I like how "I just want a woman that has a good, not trashy social circle"="You want someone who doesn't have a social life" to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 03:16 PM
4

Eh, whatever, it was pointless to write here anyway. You can feel the anger in your post right away. You already made up your mind about what to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 03:08 PM
4

Child support is a scam because of how high the amount of money can get, and because that there's nothing legally enforcing where the money actually goes. Also, unlike vetting men, vetting women is nigh impossible. The vast, vast majoirty of men who "chose well" just lucked out. Any criteria you can think of has a statistically significant amount of exceptions to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 02:51 PM
1

Not justifying it, just explaining it, but he's probably insluting them because he never received it from them, a.k.a. him not receiving it fromt them was what happened first, not him insulting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 02:23 PM
-2

"You want to bathe in your misery" This is probably true, but "and expect someone to rescue you" I don't think this is
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 02:14 PM
–

"against self-control" Literally the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 07:36 PM
–

Bullsh*t. Failing repeatedly can make anyone frustrated, nice or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 07:21 PM
–

"It's messed up, but the alternatives are worse." For women, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 07:15 PM
–

Cringe, leftism is just preferring chaos over order because order can't give total equality (chaos can't either, but for leftist it often seems it can, or at least can get closer to it), and thinking that freedom is being allowed to do anything or almost anything at any time without consequences, a.k.a. being a slave to your instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 06:52 PM
–

"I think narcissism has been rated as attractive in women too, by men, as it correlates with physical attractiveness and confidence. Secondly men have been known to write love letters to serial killers too. It isn't a trait of just women but a phenomenon across the board. Just there's more high profile, violent criminals in men than in women. Casey Anthony is an example of a woman who recieved love letters and adoration from men. Also, Italian serial killer nurse Daniela Poggiali recieved marria…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 06:36 PM
–

Why not both?/Both. Both is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 06:04 AM
1

Sad as fuck. No wonder men enforced monogamy in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 07:31 PM
7

"Imagine losing your time and chances to find love in your best years of life by locking yourself to one." History shows that this is actually a good idea more often than not, it's just that the instances when this didn't work out are exaggerated and are made to be out the majority of cases by leftists for propaganda reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 07:18 PM
-1

Just like he said, men perform better in almost every job than women as a whole/on average (which means not every man performs better than every woman at every job, but most men perform better at most jobs). The only jobs women perform better as a whole/on average (which means not every woman performs better than every man at those jobs, but most women perform better at those jobs) are those that are either directly or indirectly related to children (e. g. women are good at acrobatics because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 07:45 AM
0

It's true. Feminism is a self-correcting power. Either Western men take away women's rights to vote (not gonna happen), or once enough immigrants come in the West they change the culture and take women's rights to vote away ,or the West collapses ina big enough way that everyone loses their rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 07:28 AM
1

It's true. Feminism is a self-correcting power. Either Western men take away women's rights to vote (not gonna happen), or once enough immigrants come in the West they change the culture and take women's rights to vote away ,or the West collapses ina big enough way that everyone loses their rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 07:28 AM
1

You literally admitted in your comment you don't really know him and just heard off-handed comments (probably from progressives aka far leftists aka metally ill, misguided, resentful or straight up evil people)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 05:23 AM
0

I thought the wording of the comment as a whole was in bad taste, but yeah, that woman isn't beautiful enough to comparnsate for her cellulite and her if not now, then in the probably not too distant future/soon to be hanging belly. Unless you consider that alone to be an insult, we at least partly agree (that the wording of the comment as a whole was in bad taste).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 08:15 PM
3

"Somebody correct n if I’m wrong but is this guy not just another woman hater, thinks woman are children, mocks woman for being emotional etc?" This is such a normie thing. If you admittedly don't really know the person, either don't take anyone's word and do a bit of research, or just don't care and don't take anyone's word either.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 08:10 PM
3

His advice about self-improvement is pretty solid most of the time though, even if he doesn't live up to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 08:07 PM
1

Every day I become more and more sure of that I'm an "old soul". I want this (most young people who say something similar are either lying or don't really know themselves well enough to give an accurate answer) and I'm only 25.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 02:07 PM
1

Because everyone knows deep down that men and women are not equal
/r/MensRights01/01/23 07:37 AM
5

At all times is a bit much I think, but definitely most of the time.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 12:11 PM
5

This may sound depressing, but this is just another way to put the non-"alpha", non-chad guys out of the equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/22 06:01 PM
4

It's the makeup and the different beauty standards. Average men and the average women have relatively small differences when it comes to their faces, but most women use makeup, and what most people would consider ideal looka for men and ideal looks for women makes it so that the average man is farther from the ideal looks for men than the average woman is from the ideal looks for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 08:17 PM
1

Based answer
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 10:01 PM
1

Based. It always comes down to incel or normie vs chad at the end of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 09:49 PM
1

The only based answer I've seen so far
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 09:45 PM
8

They can only do it if they're not attracted to the man in question. I'm not joking, I'm dead serious. They wouldn't be fooled for so long or wouldn't deny when being with an abusive chad (not all chads are abusive) otherwise. The best they can universally see is frustration (not knowing the reason) and desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 02:04 PM
19

Because women don't notice it in themselves, they just slowly loose attraction without ever really knowing why. Even if they know at one point, they forget it, deny it, or deny it until they forget it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 01:00 PM
3

Many people aren't going to agree here, because the decline is actually happening too slow for them to notice. I'm not any different, I probably wouldn't have noticed either if I didn't want to look up why several movies in the last 5 pr so years are not just bad, but bad in the same way. I just wanted to watch movies, but now I'm aware of the West's decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 08:39 AM
3

Yeah, your dad pretty much sounds like uniquely based for a parent/father despite how common boomer jokes are.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 02:08 AM
1

Saying that a guy who's a 7/10 by looks isn't really a 7/10 because 6/10's don't accept him is a covert way of saying that women are always right about their standards/ratings and none of them have expectations they don't meet, which sounds like something a woman or a simp would say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 10:58 AM
0

Preference and economics. There's been studies done that show that women who have more money have or want less kids, while men generally always want the same number of kids no matter how much money they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 04:57 PM
2

Huh, this is the first time I've heard "You’re looking at it from the male perspective" with it sounding legitimate with the argument presented.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 06:32 PM
1

Mine is an anecdote, but lived experiences are valid arguments, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 08:34 PM
6

"Men who aren't abusive deadbeats are the exception, not the norm." Women still believe their choices encompass all kinds of men because it seems to be true when viewed with a surface level glance. Also, water is wet. Let's face it, most women want men that are good natured, but also aren't pushovers, meek or insecure, they don't even notice men that have those flaws next attached to their good nature, and although those kinds of men aren't as rare like like winning lottery tickets, they're like…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:51 PM
4

Bullshit, women have always put themselves at first over anyone else, including their children, it's just that the culture they were in have stopped them from doing that all the time previously. I've seen how women in office jobs can bullshit through half of their shift at work, and that was before 2016, which means women were already judged less for what they did for a while (probably a good while) before 2016 when it came to judging people based on actually important stuff. Also, willingly sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:32 PM
7

Your first sentence doesn't just apply to what you suggest it applies to. Let's be honest, most men can't find meaning/purpose in their life without a woman for long, otherwise socially, culturally and enforced by law monogamy wouldn't have been such a widespread thing at any time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:22 PM
9

"Just deny reality bro, you'll feel better"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:16 PM
10

*for weeks, months or years on end
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:15 PM
3

Why don't they act like they know it then so often?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:10 PM
6

You don't value it because you have access to it and are used to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:01 PM
6

Only women and chads can be spoiled enough to think this. Women were the ones who were told more and more often that a relationship must be good/great/amazing 24/7 ever since the sexual revolution. The guy who wrote this is spot on: "I think social media, TV etc has messed up the expectations of what relationships are. It’s rare to find long term couples that are genuinely “excited”. That’s why the phrase “honey moon period” even exists. Part of that long term stability involves habituation whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 07:58 PM
1

The problem is you were lucky, but there's nowhere near enough of these types of men for every woman that wants them, yet they only search for these types of men anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 08:53 AM
2

Unless this is fake, it's not just men that think this: https://img.ifunny.co/images/7efe0748c5ec2df29403b2e0b8d1e1e0f518a772b7b080ece7cfe651c1998be1_1.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 08:49 AM
5

They're not guaranteed to be good, but if the other guys are so rarely good, then may as well try a few times.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 08:38 AM
1

There are some matriarchies currently, and there were also some historically. Why they have never been anyrhing but primitive sh*tholes?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 02:04 PM
2

Just do x bro
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 07:42 AM
7

Guys, this is the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 08:50 AM
0

Women hunting were the exception, not the rule, and we have no good reason to assune that it was just as common as men hunting, otherwise why would the evidence for it be so much less common. I could imagine women hunting mammoths, but women defending themselves against big cats (sabertooth tigers, cave lions, American lions, lions, tigers), or bears (short faced bears, cave bears, grizzly bears), almost no chance (it's debateable whether or not a big cat or a bear would be easier to beat with s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 08:31 AM
9

https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/amp/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 08:21 AM
7

"I've never understood the guys who complain about online adult models, since most of them seem to be actively following these lady's content at the same time as they complain about it. (Ie "She keeps posting pictures of herself, talk about WANTING VALIDATION!" ... said while going through and LOOKING at every one of those pictures...)" This may be a thing on Instagram, but the vast majority of the guys who complain about OnlyFans aren't paying for it. To me, OnlyFans is a rip off, I'm not payin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:41 PM
4

"Stable options" are just walking wallets that can be divorced at any time for any reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:31 PM
1

I noticed something I bet you think no one would've noticed. If we estimate that about 99% of men are not innovators, then it's a more reasonable estimate that 99.9% of women are not innovators instead of 99%, and there's no significant change in this despite 101 years of feminism. It was another subtle sentence trying to make equality where it's not present.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:02 AM
2

And what makes you think you deserve an exceptional man? You better not be average yourself then (and know, what you think of yourself is not relevant, other people's opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:54 AM
2

This something that isn't worth spelling out loud even though it's true, because it just pisses women off without driving them to introspection, and the main thing is that infidelity from anyone is bad for kids anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 01:51 PM
0

I'll give you that women generally treat people's anxiety a bit better when the guy doesn't try to be a boyfriend probably due to them generally being more neurotic in the first place, but you need more similarities than that for engaging conversations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 02:39 AM
1

His reply is asshole-ish, but basically, he has a hard time tolerating the way women can be bad (usually in a different way than men). I can understand it in some ways, but despite that and despite that many women just aren't interested in a lot of stuff men are interested in ,there are women who can offer a nice company regardless, even if not as engaging as the more similar other men most of the time (though it's better when the woman has some similar interests).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 02:21 AM
1

Yeah, most men don't respect actual sluts, but when a woman is not actually a slut, it's just a variation of the empty insults people say when they're mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 02:00 AM
2

So? People say stuff they don't really mean or stuff that they know isn't really true when they're mad, big whoop.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:42 AM
1

Depends on whether or not they want to be stay at home dads or not, and on whether or not you're a good leader. If you think of replying that you're a good leader, it probably means you're not actually a good leader, because good leaders are less likely to say that and are more likely to be unsure about their capabilities. Also, the fact that the divorce rate is 75-85% when the woman earns more than the man in a household, and women initiate the majority of these divorces as well, not just tha a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:30 AM
1

To have kids first at age 20-30 or 25-30, then have a job/career at 40-50 or 45-50.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:24 AM
2

It's just a go-to insult for some men when they're mad, there isn't any "how can I benefit from this" thought process behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:19 AM
1

No, that's your automatic negative assumption that was probably taught to you. There are a lot of men that want to be responsible for women/take responsibility off of women's shoulders out of love, not because they secretly think women are incapable or worse at it. Your mindset only allows you to see the men that do think that though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:14 AM
2

I wouldn't be surprised if the survey would've been done with the same amount of rigor as the one in three/four/five(?) statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:05 AM
0

That's just you percieving it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:00 AM
1

I think it depends a lot on the level of horniness. When men are really horny, the differences of women just become an obstacle to getting laid. Also, I think the thing about not appearing feminine isn't always about seeing it as inferior, it's just that people don't like to be percieved as something they don't really percieve themselves as. For example, tigers are badass, but I still wouldn't want people to think that I'm a tiger.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 12:57 AM
1

TRP can feel gross from anyone because most of it sounds very similar to the cold, dispassionate description of animal behaviours. Here's the kicker though; I can/could say all kinds of gross stuff about hyenas, African wild dogs and basically any species of wild dogs, yet I still find them cute when they're calm and I'd still pet them if I could do it without injury.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 12:48 AM
1

Biology tells us it it would be better in many aspects to be swapped. It haven't been tried yet on a meaningful scale anyway, so may as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 12:34 AM
0

I think you think that because you suconsiously don't keep in mind that more authority also comes with more responsibility. In general, the less you like something, the less you want to have responsibilities attached to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 12:17 AM
2

But I want to attract people, not dogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 09:01 PM
2

It's basiaclly a way of saying "B*tch, we're in control".
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:50 PM
2

I don't care, the West is f*cked anyway at this point. Wait for Prince Charming or die alone waiting for him, you're happier alone waiting for him than with an average man, and even if you all would get with an average man, it wouldn't save the West anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 12:46 PM
1

https://youtu.be/e2wSUl568vc https://youtu.be/v2rjLF7KRtY
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 12:37 PM
1

https://youtu.be/e2wSUl568vc
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 12:35 PM
-1

It's a major reason why so many people are miserable nowadays (not everyone), but it doesn't matter whether we promote it or not, the West is f*cked, try to enjoy the decline. The desruction of communities have been a disaster for the human race overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 12:33 PM
0

It doesn't matter whether we promote it or not, the West is f*cked, try to enjoy the decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 12:29 PM
1

I would agree if women could actually walk the walk on this issue by only divorcing when there are serious problems, but they do it and will always do it for minor reasons as well, arguably most of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 12:28 PM
2

Women want just as much sex as men, but only with chads, which is why what you decribed here (overpopulation within a generation) is not happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 03:49 PM
2

Betabuxxing was also for most, if not all average men, not just low tier men (80/20 rule). Also, there isn't really much evidence for the average man getting worse looking (leftist/progressive men and neckbeards can skew perception), just in the eyes of women now that they don't have to depend on individual men, only men as a collective through taxes (most women aren't net taxpayers), and now that they see more top men and have a higher chance of meeting top men than before the internet, social …
/r/TheRedPill15/10/21 11:10 AM
4

Except men have much more variation when it comes to what kind of women they're attracted to (betabuxxes aren't proof that women have just as much variation when it comes to this).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 06:50 PM
4

Unironically true most of the time (again, not always).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 06:48 PM
20

It should be obvious to anyone thinking a bit about it. Men generally do romantic stuff (there are exceptions), women generally have romantic stuff done to them (there are exceptions).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 06:44 PM
1

https://youtu.be/fx-3lK_6ZQc https://youtu.be/BqiSwahrfZE
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:29 PM
1

It depends on your perspective. If you want/wanted a more realistic version of a Disney relationship/something close a 50s relationship, then it's a blackpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 10:02 PM
1

Brutal black/redpill, true though
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 06:51 PM
2

Pretty much. Women just project chad's behaviour on all men again.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 08:05 AM
6

This is the standard "We have to make up for past negative discrimination of said group with present positive discrimination for said group" progressive opinion. https://youtu.be/fx-3lK_6ZQc https://youtu.be/BqiSwahrfZE
/r/MensRights30/09/21 04:55 PM
1

We're in the decline of western civilization. Even technological developments have been slowing down since the 70s (source: Whatifalthist, also, it's not hard the figure out based on that most of hour planes are just improved version of planes from the 60s and 70s).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 08:29 AM
1

This doesn't disprove hypergamy and the 89/20 rule, so women who know about them and have a guilty conscience about it will never truly lift it off from themselves with this and continue life like they're not real. They'll always know in theback of their mind that they're real, and this doesn't disprove them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 12:37 PM
1

Fault-divorce=evidence of abuse or constant heated arguments with shouting (not interpreted through the Duluth model).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 06:34 PM
1

Hell no, I'm pretty sure not even every chad, or even most chads can be so direct.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 06:29 PM
1

The answer is that most men would want to be beta bux, just the way it used to work (with fault-divorce).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 12:25 PM
1

Yeah, but most men love the woman they're with for things that are literally parts of the women themselves, while money isn't (even if we assume that the man is being shallow only liking the woman for her looks, your body is a part of you, not just a consequence of your actions), and as an end in and of themselves, not as a means to an end.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 10:39 PM
1

This is just some post-modernist blank slate bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 11:51 PM
0

I see you conveniently only quoted part of the sentence. Anyway, [email protected] can give you just about all the data you need on this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 04:54 PM
0

Men doing these things is the ideal, since they're less preoccupied with pussy when there's monogamy, and they do everything better than women except for things that are directly or indirectly related to children anyway (as a group). At best, women could replace low status men, or they would be a slightly/noticably inferior replacement based on how they already want to change workplace rules to create a less cutthroat environment (the "not mentoring is bullying" mentality, etc.). It's probably n…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 04:20 PM
1

Look, if the destruction of monogamy would slow down technological progress even by just a few seconds (which probably would be considered a reasonable assumption even by bule pill standards), then I would prefer to maintain monogamy over whatever else women want/would want relationship-wise. Humanity has a destiny to fulfill (post-scarcity, transhumanism, space colonization), the sooner the better (I'll only live for so long naturally after all, especially considering that I may commit suicide …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 03:59 PM
0

"Being a successful scientist is a prestigious enough job to get pussy." Yeah, but most scientists aren't all that good looking either, meaning most of them are betabucks. I wouldn't make it not worth/eliminate the option of betabucks because of this reason, and also because autpmation can't replace most of our worker drone average Joes yet. Also, I never said most men would be MGTOW without monogamy, most would be incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 03:21 PM
0

Only a few scientists were popular with women throughout history, most of the others that were making smaller scale, though arguably equally important developments were betabucks, and their names aren't known, and the same is true today. We'll get rid of these scientists if everything will go unchanged, and then we'll have only about as much scientist as much the average person knows by name from history. Also, even the average Joe is imporant as of now (automation is often overblown and thus se…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 01:49 PM
0

"The notion of lifelong monogamy in and of itself is archaic." Fuck off, that was what made worth having a relationship with a woman instead of just sex, getting rid of it is basically drastically decreasing the chance of more meaningful connection. Also, non-monogamous societies are more violent and primitive. We're slowly going back to the 17 female ancestor for every male ancestor state because of the slow abandonment of monogamy, which will slow down our way to post-scarcity, transhumanism a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 01:35 PM
1

https://youtu.be/8byGFryWQRU
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 04:39 AM
2

https://youtu.be/8byGFryWQRU
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 04:36 AM
5

Even of he would be more miserable, that wouldn't mean it isn't true for the most part. That's why the phrase "Ignorance is bliss" exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 08:06 AM
1

Yeah, because most women are barely, if at all more responsible than teens, and most of them couldn't improve on that if they wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 08:04 AM
1

"There is nothing inherently wrong with women doing anything" That's a bit of a stretch. Some things are inherently wrong, whether it's a man or a woman who does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 08:23 AM
1

All you need to do is watch these to get it: https://youtu.be/fx-3lK_6ZQc https://youtu.be/BqiSwahrfZE
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:22 AM
3

"THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FREE TIME" Thanks, but no thanks. Pussy just isn't worth this much.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 09:54 AM
4

"movies" I was fine with your comment until this word.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 09:52 AM
–

"I mean really, is that what this whole sub is coming down to? Poor me, life is so unfair because I wasn't born an insanely hot guy? Really????" Yes, because the most pure attraction a man can experience is attraction based on his looks. Our looks are a part of us, unlike game or money, so arguably almost no man is really loved for himself, while women often get that kind of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 04:49 AM
–

"Much of what makes a man attractive to us is in how he shows up to us and to the world. His demeanor, his confidence, etc." If he meets your personal minimum requirements when it comes to looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 04:39 AM
1

Strawman, I was referring to the net-taxpayer voting system (only net taxpayers and veterans having the right to vote), which I agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 01:17 AM
1

"our knuckle-dragging ancestors" Oh, the hubris... Forgotten knowledge isn't just about what people wanna hear, no matter how much we like to pretend it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 01:09 AM
1

As per usual, people gladly shit on the mediocre or bad MGTOW channels while ignoring the good ones (Stardusk/Thinking-Ape, Colttaine, Barbarossa/bar bar, Spetznaz, CS MGTOW, Nicho Choski, TFM, Paul Proteus). Also, comment sections are always full of the lowest common denominator, no matter the channel.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 12:31 AM
0

We all know the ideal face is quite in a different league (shapes, ratios, proportions, etc.)... If you want someting more concrete, the first and the third from 5 and all from 6 here qualify: https://m.imgur.com/q1gDZqW
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 12:04 AM
2

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/girl-next-door-10853224.jpg https://cf.girlsaskguys.com/q1796627/25cc5dd9-8588-4f3f-aece-3aad92516094-m.jpg https://media.cleveland.com/plain-dealer/photo/2012/01/girls-basketball-player-of-the-week-adfed611ce1d3656.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/8459/28474939920_910472c1df_b.jpg https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-8d4eb193ca50e282260b96203dd550d5 P.S. I live in Hungary, so the average may be higher here than in the US, or at least less fat. I come across gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 11:40 PM
1

The videos go so much beyond just that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 11:15 PM
1

I know you'll never get it, or even if you would, you would probably actively reject it: https://youtu.be/fx-3lK_6ZQc https://youtu.be/BqiSwahrfZE
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 11:01 PM
1

History doesn't check out, unless you're a progressive man, in which case fuck off traitor.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 10:53 PM
0

Of course you feel like this, you're a woman. Women can't go back in lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 10:34 PM
-1

You can't have a good marriage that doesn't last until death in my opinion. The appeal of marriage to me ever since I was a kid was in big part that I imagined it would last until death. A good or even just a tolerable marriage that lasts until death is superior to me compared to anything else. A "good" marriage that doesn't last until death is like eating a cake that's filled with chocolate in one half and with shit in the other in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 10:22 PM
1

Don't even bother with it. Here's why you'll never convince them: https://youtu.be/fx-3lK_6ZQc https://youtu.be/BqiSwahrfZE
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre03/08/21 09:41 PM
1

Don't even bother with it man. Here's why you'll never convince them: https://youtu.be/fx-3lK_6ZQc https://youtu.be/BqiSwahrfZE
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 08:42 PM
0

Yeah, but only half of them are lucky enough to have a lasting marriage. I can't even imagine in my mind the sea of people the unsuccessful half consists of. Don't get me wrong, betabux isn't wrong in and of itself, that's what most men were doing in the 50s as well, but it was worth it at that time because divorce was way less likely to occour.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 08:39 PM
6

"You act like men had been characters back in the 19th century. Newsflash: they didn’t." And you act like the men you're talking about weren't always a minority of men, even if if they were a bigger minority then than later.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 08:30 PM
-2

"And most of those women end up with men around their own level. Lets stop pretending their is tonnes of women in their late 30's hanging around waiting for chad to finally notice her, most people pair up." Yeah, and than they divorce them later because they can no longer stand them for their money, so they get money from them through divorce from that point on (betabux).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 08:27 PM
1

Girl next door means average girl/girl with a bit of a butterface unless you're seaching for it and you're getting porn results.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 08:25 PM
1

It wasn't near-impossible to have a relatooionship with your looksmatch though
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 08:23 PM
2

Except in the 50s, and maybe in some other short periods in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 08:16 PM
1

I thought that's obvious, so I went with the most common description.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 01:10 PM
-3

Women want a man that can easily beat them up but chooses not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 12:57 PM
5

Easily said by the passive
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 08:38 AM
4

Alpha in this context is an attractive, confident man with good social skills, while a beta is either the opposite of the alpha or a suck-up to the alpha, and a gamma is always the opposite of the alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 08:33 AM
5

It's just the same shit women have been doing for eternity: https://youtu.be/xlvEj_f5_zw
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 08:16 AM
3

Traslation=If you can't get by on looks alone, you'll never get pure attraction as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 08:12 AM
3

80% of men have that despite 80% of men being considered unattractive. Yeah, because two incomes are better than one
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 07:32 AM
5

So basically, most women still hate nerds (unless it's a nerd like Henry Cavill of course)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 07:17 AM
1

Lies, less and less women are satisfied with anything but chad or at best chadlite unless they're fine with marrying for money, there's so much proof for it even ignoring the OkKupid data.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 07:10 AM
2

"Also: "God is dead" - Nietzsche // "Nietzsche is dead" - God" Played out joke, also, just about every bad thing he predicted will happen to people due to lack of religion happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 03:38 PM
3

"They can raise those kids perfectly well alone if the man pussies out of it." Proven to be bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 12:23 PM
1

Men have a higher sex drive in a way that they can be as horny for an average eoman as women are for chads, while women are only as horny or more horny than men for chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 07:21 AM
8

Even based on this, it sounds like a knee-jerk reaction that can make things worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 03:07 AM
13

There are literally studies confirming that men's education or economic level doesn't affect how much they want children and how many children they want, while it does affect it in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 10:27 PM
1

Average is whatever is average, no matter the sex of the person.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 03:12 PM
1

"and are your enemy" You made up this part
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 05:19 AM
2

"I have a meat shield" How unabashedly fucked up way of thinking about men, and even telling it others. Women are oppressed though!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 07:43 AM
2

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 07:16 AM
1

Bad comparison, because you're putting a hetero and a gay man together. An "if a woman could be stronger than you" argument could be better. Either way, that should be allowed as well, just like what the. OP talks about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 07:15 AM
2

This "if stronger men argument" is a bad argument, because you're putting hetero men with gay men together in it. The "if women were stronger than men" argument would be better. Also, I partly agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 07:11 AM
3

Evopsych desribes just about as many things logically as evolution does, it's just that it's politically incorrect. Neither can be proven, it's just that both seem to describe many things well. https://youtu.be/JRazfdWosaE
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:36 PM
2

This isn't fabricated by him, even the milquetoast fence-sitter Tim Pool have talked about it on his Timcast IRL podcast. Biology doesn't care about our happiness and morals, only we do, which is why most men aren't going around raping girls of that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:26 PM
1

I agree except for this part "prefer instead of shunning career women" Most of the time, they want to be the leaders in most situations whether they're equipped to deal with said situation or not, and they equate being a leader with being an asshole in their mind. Good luck trying to control male thirst without taking away men's rights though, just about everything today (women's increased pickiness as a result of their hypergamy no longer being restricted, social media adnnd dating apps facilit…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:14 PM
9

Life is not a zero-sum game in some aspects (money), and it is in other aspects (relationships).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:02 PM
2

Everything is manipulation if you really think about it, including dating. The closest thing to no manipulation is when the woman is attracted to the man right away, but that's pretty rare. Also, average and below average men don't have any better option unless they become above average somehow. Women don't like this because they want men who are naturally good at attracting by the time they're in their teens.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 11:53 AM
2

Another boring take of a woman based on the extremes. That's why you don't talk about the red pill/MGTOW/black pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 11:48 AM
1

You're treating different things like they have the same consequences. Just another postmodernist woke tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 09:09 AM
1

You don't seem to understand that correlation sometimes equals causation, especially when it comes to how kids turn out, and having a robotic body would be objectively better in more aspects than our biological body assuming we're free to use them the way we want to use them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 09:48 PM
0

Who gives a shit
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 07:47 AM
1

Our developed civilization with the best technology was built on socially enforced monogamy (and thus can't survive for long without it, we can already see many signs of decline hidden under our developed state of being, which meeans promiscuity and non-monogamy is making it longer to get to the amazing future that a transhumanist future could be, all because people want to abandon what was a major part of us getting it to this point of development because it feels good). Get fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 10:58 AM
3

"No one cares what uptight people with repressed sexuality think." This is why people don't like sluts/promiscuous people. Shaming people who DON'T contrubite to single motherhood, the increased crime that comes from that, etc. thinking they're superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 10:48 AM
2

Donovan Sharp is an asshole, and I don't like PUAs in general, but this reads like something written by a woman or a blue-pilled man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:46 AM
1

Still a good advice, probably timeless: https://youtu.be/lO8ysZ0d-ts
/r/MensRights21/03/21 10:52 PM
4

There's barely any difference between what the vast majority of women are attracted to, since women are less likely to be much dumber than average or much smarter than average than men. There aren't enough smarter than average women to go around.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 02:01 PM
2

That's stupid. You've fallen for the overly pessimistic climate change propaganda. If it would really be that big of an issue, then why do most stars still have and continue to have beachfront property, including the ones that talk about climate change?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:59 PM
2

If it wasn't built on it, it will work on it for a few centuries at best, and may even slowly devolve even before that, which means transhumanism will be an even more distant future then.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:53 PM
2

Because our (developed) civilization wasn't built on the 80/20 rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:26 PM
4

Nice misandric justification mixed with projection about why ugly women not settling for ugly or average men is fine because an above average man fucked them once.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:23 PM
2

Yes, because why only men have to accept that they may not get with the woman they'd ideally want to get with?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:20 PM
1

it’s completely subjective on almost every level No, it's partly subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:13 PM
1

Why is it a concern whether it serves her purpose or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:11 PM
0

"and likes to remind me of that constantly" That's pretty rare, but I guess thinking this would probably happen justifies your position on the whole thing in your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:04 PM
4

Nah, fuck that, women in these position need to be told the truth. It brings down their ego to a reasonable level.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 06:01 PM
31

The Amazons are fictional.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/21 08:52 AM
3

Exactly, both women and men have a positive bias towards women, (it's a bit weaker in men, but still).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 08:51 AM
2

There's no hatred in this comment. Not everything men think is true when it comes to women you don't like is misogyny (also, only hatred counts, since misandry only has hatred/dislike/prejudice in it's definition, only misogyny has mistrust sometimes added to the definiton, really makes you think). Everything I wrote you know to be real deep down (I mean even difigured women have boyfriends the vast majority of the time). Men would probably complain about unattractive women giving them attention…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 08:15 AM
4

I hate this "nobody has it better or worse" bullshit. It comes from the notion/desire of equality, which is bullshit as well. Everybody knows deep down that men and women aren't equal (men are better at more things than women are better at, women are basically only better at things directly or indirectly related to children), just equally important for the future of humanity (women are for giving birth, men are for advancing civilization), and everybody knows deep down that women have it easier …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 07:21 AM
1

While it's true that they're just more honest/ahshow their true nature, the lack of control/artificial limit on women's hypergamy is literally destroying society. I know about the "enjoy the decline" mentality, but I want transhumanism, and this is delaying and threatening the possibility of it.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/21 08:33 AM
1

Not until societal collapse at least. Feminism is a self-correcting problem, but it also tends to take societies/civilizations with itself. Rome had a somewhat smaller feminist movement not long before it collapsed. You can ask [email protected] about all of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 12:53 PM
2

That works until the societal collapse happens I guess. I promise you what I listed will happen after that though, since the kind of men that will survive will be the kind of men that will do those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 12:20 PM
2

That's why more and more men want to limit women's hypergamy again so that they'll have fewer options so that they'll be more likely to actually be attracted to the man they're with, and get rid of no-fault divorce so that even if they're still aren't attracted, they'll still have a harder time getting rid of their husbands. This won't happen until a societal collapse happens, but that's a different question/topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 12:00 PM
1

I guess there's no point in fighting it, everything falls on men as usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 08:34 AM
1

Yeah, but they would benefit by making long-term, happy relationships more common, by not slowing down the develpoment of technology, and by not collapsing the foundation our developed civilization is based on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 08:26 AM
1

I said they aren't that, just close, and that they would benefit from trying to lower thrist in the long run as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 08:16 AM
1

You know most men won't turn that thirst down, it would require very strong self-control or very bad consequences to do so. Also, why should only men be responsible for keeping men's thirst low? Women could benefit from trying to lower male thirst too in the long run. I guess the "in the long run" part is the problem. Also, since the male sex drive is so strong, women are close enough to being telepathic demons that control our brains.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 06:20 AM
1

True, but as I said, women today are just increasing male thrist more and more since their hypergamy is no longer put under control, and thus are more picky (women being more picky=more thirst), and this is what's driving the success of OnlyFans, creating even more thirst.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 05:55 AM
2

"Problems arise when men don't get to decide who is similar in attractiveness. Everything falls apart when you take into account women find most men to be unattractive." This is why hypergamy should be put under control again. The mathematical average should be the average for women, not the bottom of the 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 05:52 AM
1

If we go by that logic, then the point of this post is that most men want to be loved for their physical currency, since that's a part of who they are (since we can't exist without our bodies, and people who get brain damage can cease to be the person they were).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 05:50 AM
0

Everything women are doing (from increasingly practiced hypergamy to OnlyFans) is just making things/thirst worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 05:42 AM
1

The latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 05:39 AM
1

Mic drop.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 05:31 AM
2

"I have found the men in my life loose interest if she doesn't have options to fuck other people." That's not normal. These men are either an example of how different some people can be, or there's just something wrong with them. The expected reaction is for the man to be glad there aren't a lot of other men interested in her, unless he wants to show off instead of just having a happy, stable, long-lasting relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 05:17 AM
0

"It’s really bizarre to have men (who aren’t and have never been women) insist on explaining my own mindset and desires to me, a woman." You're assuming most women (or people in general for that matter) aren't oblivious to and know what they're really attracted to. They don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 05:03 AM
1

"I would bet money most of the men in r/deadbedrooms are there because of their own selfish, lazy, entitled, unappreciative behavior and not because their wives never desired them and just wanted a nice lifestyle." That's where you're wrong kiddo. That's just what women would want to be true, and what would be convenient for them to be true, but their dual mating strategy disproves all of that actually being true. Your comments also just exude an air of misandric anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 04:56 AM
2

Even if the woman doesn't care about those men romantically, the fact that she's putting out for them in less time indicates she lusts for them more. Men don't want to be the ones less lusted for.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 04:47 AM
2

"You shouldn't make what isn't real a priority, and responsibility shouldn't be placed on women to compensate for men's ignorance." This sentence didn't go the way I expected. I expected: "You shouldn't make what isn't real a priority, and responsibility shouldn't be placed on women when men are better equipped to change the state of things by taking responsibilty for that as well."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 04:32 AM
1

https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 08:32 PM
3

Kinda wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 06:17 PM
2

Men are more willing the accept women below the top 20% though, and not in a way that most women accept a below top 20% man for marriage, instead, they are often genuinely happy with that. Even chads are less picky with who they sleep with than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 05:12 AM
1

Not all, just 99.9% or more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/21 08:57 AM
0

Not true, it would've happened regardless, it just happened faster because of it. Once women are free to have sex with whoever they want, they'll inevitably gravitate to a smaller and smaller pool of men. It happened because of the social gospel movenment and the progressive era, which happened because of romanticism propagating the bullshit idea of romantic love. The School of Life was right, romanticism did ruin relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 06:56 AM
1

You have to.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 05:44 AM
1

Sue her into oblivion.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 03:55 AM
1

A woman I can be with while letting myself go over time while she continues to love me, so probably nonexistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 10:54 PM
3

That guy sound like a huge red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 02:41 AM
1

And this is why you dealt with so many crazy women. They're much more common among women that want casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 10:41 AM
1

"but I am not gonna open my legs just for any guy just because they’ve asked" Yeah, not for any guy, just for ones that are above average ones (Chads or Chadlites). If you don't have sex with them that often either, that's just because of a lack of opportunity for some reason (school, work or whatever).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 10:20 AM
2

This seems to assume men can't find or never find another way that works well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 06:26 PM
0

How do you know she doesn't just want him to do it the exact same way she does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 06:14 PM
2

Yes, at least after a certain age (around 30).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 06:05 PM
1

I think that meant they want to marry, but can only marry a man like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 06:02 PM
1

Most women want the man to earn more, even if the money isn't the primary reason they're together.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 05:59 PM
2

Except if you wanna have a kid. Most men don't want to raise someone else's kid. Also, this just sounds like you trying to find reasons why what you wanna do is good, however contrived they may be.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 05:44 PM
1

I don't think that's weird just yet. There are still plenty of people who want monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 05:38 PM
9

Suspicion confirmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 11:03 AM
6

Would be fine with me if the rules would otherwise be the same. I think most people who agree with this just want an excuse to sleep around though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 09:35 AM
-3

They aren't more compatible, as u/MyLadySupporter said, they have less option, or in the relatively rare case they have the tingles (attraction) to each other, and think that's enough for a happy, long-lasting relationship despite that in most of those realitonships, the tingles are secondary to the qualities those two people have.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 08:40 AM
2

You have a typical woman/feminist opinion on it based on a few instances. The majority them are becuse people no longer take commitment seriously though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 08:36 AM
3

I think the first one for men either stems from being a degenerate or the "Enjoy the decline" mentality. The others are not as much of a sure thing/not as common as most women seem to think either, and when they're real, it's mostly unconcious. The first one for women is because they're even more afraid of and crushed by rejection than men. The other are more real/more common then the others after the first in men, especially the parts related to tingles, but it's mostly unconscious in their cas…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 09:04 PM
2

Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 09:31 AM
0

Yes, because that one guy always has the same size.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 12:08 AM
8

"I don't make the rules, I just use them to my advantage."
/r/MensRights01/01/21 02:40 AM
1

"Yes - that's why at first you shoot low or find a TRUE looksmatch, not your fucked up idea of one." I know this wasn't a reply to me, but I identify with the whole conversation. This is me: https://scontent.fbud3-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/12294900_916939988384824_6076373506448565032_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=2&_nc_sid=7aed08&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ohc=WqjWjVmSap0AX-o65Oh&_nc_ht=scontent.fbud3-1.fna&tp=14&oh=08524fb7c87110126482acb8f87edf88&oe=601136B7 And this is a girl I would consider…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 11:39 PM
1

I partly agree, but the internet has also made hypergamy stronger. Also, hypergamy has always been around, it was just controlled to different degrees depending on how far we go back.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 11:18 PM
1

I was talking in a general sense about countries, not the US. My country and several other European countries keep pourong money into it, yet it remains trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 09:38 AM
1

That's the point, people should pay for their own stuff in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 09:13 PM
0

"Edit: just noticed the libertarian/socialist part- A social safety net isn’t socialist. In fact, you need some sort of safety net in a capitalist system in order to maintain a labor force capable of work, particularly for lower income jobs. Socialism would mean that those workers own the means of production, which is not at all what’s happening" Yeah, it's voting it to yourself instead of taking it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 08:28 PM
1

"I agree that it’s shitty but I think it’s because they’re underfunded" God, how much longer do we have to keep pumping money into it until people realize it won't change anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 08:09 PM
1

"you want to get rid of public schools?" Yeah, they're fucking trash, just like just about anything the government does/makes. "Schools notwithstanding we have so many social programs designed to help children in poverty." Yeah, which are just as trash and counterproductive long-term. This is the unfortunate disadvantage of libertarianism compared to socialism; it's only better long-term.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 08:03 PM
1

That's just one of the solutions that doesn't involve enslaving people. I should've started with listing all, but only started doing it later.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:24 PM
1

Not for me, or any person who doesn't want to be forced to pay for your shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:18 PM
1

Either you should pay for birth control, for the fallout of not being able to pay for birth control, you should get money for birth control only from people who want to give you money for birth control, keep your legs closed, or you should try to find some way to have more money. No solution should include me being forced to pay a single penny for your shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:17 PM
1

"It’s my Money as I pay for it, I contribute." I doubt it, chances are you're not a net taxpayer. Even if your were, it's not just from your money anyway. "Besides it costs you far far more of I get pregnant." That's the point, I shouldn't be forced to pay for that either.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:15 PM
2

Yeah, and it's fucking sad. Some people have to experience what it's like to be a slave or what it's like to starve to value freedom. Also, there were starving in the USSR regardless, and it wouldn't surprrise me if it were present in China as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:12 PM
0

"no why would I when I can get it free as part of my healthcare" That's the point, you shouldn't. You're not entitled to other people's money and/or labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:10 PM
0

Bullshit. At the time when only landowners or net taxpyaers had the right to vote, taxes were low, and and there were still some people who rose to the top from the bottom, which means being broke is a state, while being poor is a lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 05:30 PM
1

Well, that's what it was about. People felt entitled to their labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 05:18 PM
2

Neither should be subsidized.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 05:10 PM
1

"provided by the state as they understand that if they give me this for free I will contribute in many more ways than having a child who will also have to be paid for by means of birth, education etc." Again, neither should happen. At the end of the day, you aren't, or at least shouldn't be entitles to other peoople's labor, that's slavery. Oh, and I wouldn't want other people to pay for men's condom either, but nice try with the second sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:58 PM
1

At the end of the day, you aren't entitled to other people's labor. That's slavery.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:53 PM
2

"Subsidizing condoms and the pill is much cheaper than subsidizing the education and healthcare of children with poor/absent parents." Yeah, that's why neither should be subsidized.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:44 PM
1

"You do realize that your tax money don't go into anyone else's pockets except for the government ya?" It's not that different in Europe either. They could fund a US quality healthcare from all the tax money they collect, but they don't. That's why people should be against taxes (forcing other people to pay for your shit) overall. Too bad non-net taxpayers are too low-information to realize this. I'd rather pay more for good healthcare than not pay for a shitty one. People either die from not be…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:41 PM
1

Either you should pay for birth control, for the fallout of not being able to pay for birth control, you should get money for birth control only from people who want to give you money for birth control, or you should try to find some way to have more money. You shouldn't have a right to other people's labor, that's slavery, antithetical to libertarianism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:34 PM
1

Yeah. There were some people who became rich despite having generational disadvantage, which means being broke is a state, but being poor is a lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:29 PM
1

"Are you one of those who don't understand why tax going towards universal healthcare and free education is bad?" I totally understand that. It's bad because you aren't entitled to other people's labor (and also because these are garbage quality).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:27 PM
1

Yeah, and it's fucked up. You shouldn't have a right to other people's labor, that's slavery. Only people that have to or want to pay for it should pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:21 PM
1

Yeah, fuck that as well. Pay for your shit, get money from people who want to pay for your shit, pay for the fallout if you can't pay for birth control, try to find a way to get more money, or get fucked. Adapt or die.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:20 PM
1

Yeah, and it's fucked up. At least when only landowners or net taxpayers were able to vote, taxes were kept relatively low.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:18 PM
1

"non-leeching government" There's no such thing. Either you should pay for birth control, for the fallout of not being able to pay for birth control, you should get money for birth control only from people who want to give you money for birth control, or you should try to find some way to have more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 04:03 PM
1

Ok, you're not a libertarian. I think people should be able to pay for only what they wanna pay for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:49 PM
1

That's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:48 PM
1

Guns are a right because you can defend yourself with them. You won't die without sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:34 PM
1

You shouldn't though. People shouldn't be able to force other people to pay for stuff they don't wanna pay for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:32 PM
1

I want to be free to pay only for stuff I wanna pay for, die mad about it. I would maybe even consider wanting to pay for it, but i would still despise being forced to pay for it. We're becoming more and more like China because people want to force other people to pay for stuff they don't wanna pay for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:29 PM
1

I want to be free to pay only for stuff I wanna pay for. We're becoming more and more like China because people want to force other people to pay for stuff they don't wanna pay for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:28 PM
2

So, not wanting to pay for other people's stuff makes me an icel? I thought that was a libertarian thing. Either you should pay for birth control, for the fallout of not being able to pay for birth control, you should get money for birth control only from people who want to give you money for birth control, or you should try to find some way to have more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:18 PM
0

"It’s cheaper to pay for birth control and abortions than to pay for an army of poor children and health bills for poor women." People should pay for that themselves as well. You shouldn't be able to force anyone to pay for anything they don't want to pay for. People should pay for their own shit, other people should have the choice to pay or not pay for it. If I want to, I'll pay, otherwise get out of my pockets.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:17 PM
1

False equivalency. We create societies, so we could live without forcing other people to pay for our stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:13 PM
1

"I also think the whole no taxes on tampons is stupid" What tax? Why should it be taxed? People should just pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:11 PM
1

Ok, it should remain that way, and it should be like that in Europe as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:08 PM
1

"I disagree" I have some guesses why that is, I'm pretty sure you know the reasons I'm referring to. "Short of a revolution that's the best you can get." I'd be glad to have a libertarian revolution, but it's not actually the only option. The other option is the create a "no-go zone" with like-minded people. The muslims did and continue to do it in Europe, the orthodox jews did it, and most importantly, the Amish did it, and the governments don't do anything about it. You would think the governm…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 03:07 PM
2

"So the next best this is that the people that pay taxes are the only voters." Yeah, only net taxpayers should vote, or at the very least, their vote should be worth twice as much. Our society is slowly becoming more and more China-like because that's not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:55 PM
1

"This is mealy-mouthed Leftist phrasing, which no one should employ. There is no "overturning" the election, since the God-Emperor won it. There is only exposing how deep the fraudpill goes." Oh I didn't realize it's a phrasing that gives lipservice to leftists, and I didn't know how to phrase it otherwise. Could you tell me a better phrasing then? "In fact, what is taking place at this very moment is that we are waiting for Biden to concede, for the obvious reason that Biden lost and the eviden…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:50 PM
2

Yeah, they can, but they shouldn't be able to. States right should become a thing again so that only people who consent to it pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:46 PM
0

Ok, you pay for it then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:42 PM
0

Ok, pay for it instead of forcing other people to pay for it then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:41 PM
1

Ok, pay for birth control then i.stead of forcing other people to pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:40 PM
1

Not need, advantage, so you should pay for it instead of forcing other people to pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:39 PM
1

People should pay for the shit they want, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:38 PM
0

Ok, you pay for birth control then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:38 PM
1

Ok, you pay for birth control then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:37 PM
0

Ok, you pay for birth control then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:37 PM
2

Ok, you pay for birth control then. If you can't, and you can't pay for the fallout either, then that's the consequence of your actions. You shouldn't be able force anyone to pay for anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:36 PM
1

"Your taxes will be used to deal with the fallout." That's the point, it shouldn't. People should pay for that themselves as well. Some people have overcome the generational disadvantages of being poor before, which means being broke is a state, but being poor is a lifestlye. You shouldn't be able to force anyone to pay for anything unless he/she consents to it. "effective government spending" There's no such thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:30 PM
2

"especially if - DEUS VULT - the God-Emperor assumes the White House for a second go-round" You mean if he's able to overturn the election or if he refuses to concede (which won't happen, he will concede, just at the latest possible date by the rules)? In either case, there probably won't be a civil war, the right will just take it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:27 PM
1

Ok, you should pay for your birth control tjen.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:19 PM
1

"You know when the government doesn't provide birth control, what would really happen is that poor people would suffer for having had sex, rich people will continue having consequence-free sex" Yeah, and? You should pay for birth control, you have no right to force other people to pay for your own birth control. "Do you dislike poor people?" Kinda. People will never start from the same place, but some people manage to become rich regardless despite generational disadvantages, which means being b…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:19 PM
1

No, these are all just advantages, so you should pay for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:12 PM
0

Pay for it then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:11 PM
1

Since people won't stop doing it, they should pay for it, not force other people to pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:10 PM
1

Ok, you should pay for your decisions, not force other pwople to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:09 PM
1

Ok, you pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:08 PM
1

Not it's not. If you want sex but don't want kids, you should pay for birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:07 PM
1

That's something you should oay for though, since it's your decision to have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:06 PM
1

Yeah, and that education is garbage quality as a result. Basocally, people pay for other people's education only for it to be garbage, instead of people paying for it themselves that would reault in better quality education. The choice is between either more expensive better education or subsidized shit education. Neithwr is ideal, but I prefer the former, and I despise living with other people forcing me to participate in the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:05 PM
1

The point is that things that aren't need shoildn't be paid for by all people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:02 PM
1

I don't care, what I said is the best option that doesn't take money from me for other people's decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 02:00 PM
1

No, it's just an advantage, so everyone should pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:58 PM
2

It's not a need, it's anjust advantage, so you should pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:57 PM
1

Ok, you pay for birth control then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:54 PM
1

Ok, you pay for birth control then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:54 PM
2

There were still less, even if not by much, but okay, you pay for birth control them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:52 PM
1

"because people have a 'right' not to starve" They don't though, that's a privilige granted to them through other people's money.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:51 PM
1

Yeah, and the difference is that people die waiting for it and because of the quality of it instead of not being able to pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:47 PM
0

The geeater good is one of the wirst aguments ever that often leads to tyranny, because it creates a sliééery slope. If you want to have sex and don't want to have kids, you should pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:46 PM
-1

You can fuck, but you pay for birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:44 PM
-2

Ok, then pay for it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:42 PM
0

"and inability to discipline oneself does not translate into X must be a need" I agree, that's why you should pay for birth control yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:41 PM
1

Ok, pay for it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:39 PM
1

Not need, just adcbavantage. Pay for it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:38 PM
1

Ok, éay for it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:37 PM
1

They do, but pay for it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:36 PM
1

Ok, pay for it then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:35 PM
1

Ok, then pay for your own shit or keep your legs closed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:34 PM
1

Ok, éay for your own shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:33 PM
0

Ok, but you pay for it yourself. Ir's not a need, so don't trewat like it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:32 PM
0

Fuck that though. Keep your legs close our fuck up your life as long as you need my money to not fuck up your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:31 PM
1

Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:29 PM
2

You don't die without birth control either, you can just keep your legs closed. Yes, you'll probably be less happy, but so are men because of sex not being a need. Also, I don't care about your happines if it costs me money.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:26 PM
1

Well, who cares about what you want. I don't want to pay for your shit because you don't want to keep your legs closed. Do something that doesn't cost me money.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:23 PM
1

Yeah, but it doesn't need to create bastard kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:22 PM
2

Because they're obviously a huge part of our society...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:21 PM
2

Bring slut shaming back and they'll be less bastard kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:20 PM
3

I agree, except fir the civil war part. The right is too much of a pussy to stand up for itself for it to happen. They'll just take it like they took everything so far, until it's too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:15 PM
2

Our society is still cumbling, even if technology develops and there won't be a ciwil war.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:14 PM
1

How is she cool? She said Trump is a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:12 PM
1

True. The government only gets involved because these people are having sex, and that affects our society (mostly in a bad way nowadays). People won't stop having sex though, so they should pay for their own healthcare. Since it's not a need, you have no right to force other people to pay for your own healthcare. Also, sex would be considered a need it if would be women who would say it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 09:56 AM
1

They did and do pretend like they do though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 09:23 AM
1

And all of the reasons you listed exist because non-net taxpayers have rhe right to vote, ans their vote is worth the same as the vote of net taxpayers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 09:00 AM
1

Because lifting weights sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 08:58 AM
1

This just sounds like a woman not understanding how can men be attracted to and have sex with women they find disgusring personality-wise. Men have sex with sluts for three reasons: they look good, they're usually better at sex, and they're easier. That doesn't mean that men consider women who aren't sluts any less attractive physically unless the woman that isn't a slut is just much less attractive physically. If there would be attractive women that would be as easy to get as sluts at first but…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 10:21 AM
1

You're talking about two different groups of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 10:11 AM
2

You only think this because you don't want marriage and fall into the category that still can make women feel genuine attraction post-sexual revolution, and not just being a betabux.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 09:56 AM
1

STFU, it's easy to say women are sexually assaulted as often by as many men as you say it when you feel like unattractive men trying to get with you is that (which is what the vast majority of women think, because they genuinely feel that way about it).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 09:44 AM
1

It's better in that it's more comfortable, but how do you know whether some of us would be happier with being less comfortable if we would have a wife there or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 08:40 PM
1

You're just trying to justify cuckoldry. Also, most people instinctively hate caring for kids that aren't their own, so people that willingly do that are an anomaly, and in a bad way the wast majority of the time. I've never seen an example when the man wasn't a sucker, and logically, a man like that can hardly ever can not be a sucker.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 05:28 PM
1

These movies just exploit already existing instincts though.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 10:57 AM
8

So you're saying that OLD and cold approaching is for Chad. No surprise there.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:45 AM
3

You seem to assume that average looking guys don't say this stuff, even though average looking guys aren't very successful either, not until they're in their 30s, if you wanna call being a betabux success.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 10:52 PM
1

They usuallly do both.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 07:55 AM
5

Ridiculous. Beta bux=because they actually bend over backwards/give up their identity for the relationship, and it still doesn't work, because they're not phisically attractive enough for the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 12:01 AM
5

"Eh, I mean didn't we all want to be with Victoria and/or David Beckham at one point?" Yeah, but men are actually capable of getting over it and even enjoying a worse deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 11:57 PM
8

Two income is still better than one though, especially when hers is hers, and his is theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 11:56 PM
1

Woman "logic"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 08:15 PM
2

I think that most women here are socialist/communist from a political standpoint and capitalist/anarcho-capitalist from a relationship standpoint, while the opposite is true for most men here, so I disagree that main ideology here is libertarianism, since this is a subreddit about relationships, and the majority of the people here are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 08:59 PM
1

https://youtu.be/L6Gcv5jfPs0
/r/askTRP17/10/20 12:44 PM
11

"Scientists can't be any less biased than me"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 04:17 AM
7

"Studies that don't support woke delusions are fake"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 04:16 AM
4

It's amazing how women nowadays conflate dates with hookups. Yeah, a woman like that probaly won't have a long term relationship last for years until her late 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 04:09 AM
10

Nobody wants her for hookups. Also, she probably doesn't even notice the existence of men who want a long term relationship with her because of her standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 04:05 AM
12

Bullshit. Virgin women were always sought after. This is just projection. Women want men who are wanted by many women, because they rarely face fierce competition compared to men. Also, there's no such thing as a woman that no man wants, only that no man wants a woman that is up to her standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 04:01 AM
3

While your advice is valid, you kinda sound like a woman with your explanation. The fact that certain unconscious behaviours can make women uncomfortable is only interesting if you wanna know why what you're doing naturally doesn't work, not because you're making the poor whamen uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/20 05:52 AM
2

This logic ignores that we no longer live in nature or in primitive societies, but in a society that partly became what it is today by incentivizing the largest possible amount of men to work by monogamy. We would be worse off trechnologically without monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 06:52 AM
0

Genghis Khan
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 11:35 PM
0

That's because the don't have, and didn't have the numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 08:07 PM
-2

"just because women want respect doesn’t mean that men can’t have it" That's where you're wrong kiddo. Human nature is darker than most people think. "We're barely out of the jungle."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 07:56 PM
1

Where do you see a deficit in respect? Pretty mich everywhere. Men are always depicted as idiots, or just bad in general. The most men get is some surface level "oh yeah, that was nice" comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 01:55 PM
0

They don't seem to think this is possible.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 10:01 PM
1

No, I would want to be loved for my personality, even though I know that it's not logical to want that as a man. BTW, this is why red pill men say that women don't really love men, because they're loved for their accomplishments, and that's not the love men want. Gays are lucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 10:12 PM
11

I thought it would be people having opinions halfway between the blue and the red pill, turns out it's red pill men and FDS women.
/r/MGTOW226/08/20 03:11 PM
2

Lower sex drive in that they have a sex drive as high or even higher than men for far less men than men for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:00 AM
3

Agreed. Women do age like milk, but men don't age like wine, they just age like milk in the fridge.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 12:26 AM
5

"it's not bad, it just disadvantages ppl looking for lifelong love" That's why it's bad. Lifelong monogamy is the bedrock of Western Civilization. The speed of development is faster when monogamy is socially enforced.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 02:49 PM
10

"This is just dumb nice guy drivel." No. He just says that good looking who have a bad personality are chosen over the opposite more often than before dating apps because the first thing people see are pictures, which is absolutely true.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 02:46 PM
1

It's not one or the other. Most of the reasons they bring up have made it harder for men, but most of the time they still have some chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 11:44 PM
2

Look man, you don't know for sure how will she react. One woman may find you attractive enough to go for it, another may not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 11:37 PM
1

And? That doesn't make it worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 06:01 PM
4

I bet a woman wrote this. We don't seem to be going back to the "it takes a village" mentality at all, we just hve more and more single mothers. Also, you'd like to go back to that because it ensures paternal uncertainty for the man and polygamy/serial monogamy for the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 02:08 PM
0

70-95%
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 11:41 AM
1

I agree that Bojack is an asshole, I was just saying that the audience knows what can be known about him better than the characters aroind him, since we know his thoughts/intent, and that makes more difficult for us to have no positive thoughts about him, while some characters think worse of him than the audience, because they only see his actions in the show.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 11:32 PM
2

Men rarely replace a woman with a better woman, they usually replece a woman out of wanting to have sex again or wanting something different/variety (polygamy) instead of wanting a better woman (hypergamy).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 11:22 PM
1

"You’re assuming what we do always gives us a reputation or “status”" It really does. If I lie, I'll probably gain the reputation of being a liar/being dishonest, which can lower my status if if people know about it. Also, if they don't know about it, then I can increase my status with it, and get a good reputation. "My gf got to know me very well without being privy to my “social status” because she spent time with me, it’s my behaviour and actions that expressed who I was." That's probably sti…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 11:13 PM
1

I didn't really put any effort into my appearance to make my body look better, yet I barely look any different than I did 5 years ago. There are people who can wake up with their hair all messed up, no makeup, without ever working out and still be beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 10:56 PM
1

"Social status is reputation. While that can give us an idea, nothing beats getting to know someone directly." So you agree with me that actions like aquiring a certain social status don't tell us the full picture. You have to admit then that what we do doesn't really define who we are, since something can only define us if it tells us the full picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 10:53 PM
1

Yeah, tjen she likes you because someone else have put effort into making that money. Even the reward for the lottery is made by people working, while there are some people who are just beautiful without working out or using makeup, which means they are just that way without any effort from anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 10:50 PM
1

People who have dark humour have it because it developed as a response to something bad happening to them, even if as a response to a minor thing. Also, money always requires effort from SOMEONE. Even if someone wins the lottery, the reward was made by people's labour, it didn't come attached to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 10:37 PM
1

Well, since we can't read minds, we can only judge people by their actions, social status, etc. which is not theor personality. Their personality is what we can only get to know by asking, assuming they honestly tell them (thoughts/intent).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 10:35 PM
1

Nobody is born with it, it develops over time. I wasn't exactly correct to say that it is like money though, because unlike money, humour can develop just by living in a given environment, while getting money requires conscious effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 10:29 PM
1

You don't know that for sure, only if you're talking about romantic love, but anyway, losing/ruining a body part usually changes people mentally as well. And you'll probably always have your pussy, so it will always be a part of who you are, and the whole thing is just a hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 10:15 PM
1

"What we do, defines who we are." Bullshit. You think that only because we usually can't judge people by their thoughts/intent, and beacuse our social status is based on what we do (not really on what kind of person we are).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 10:10 PM
1

"humour" Lol, no. Humour is like money, it's external.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 09:59 PM
1

It's still better, because it's based on something you're born with (pussy) instead of something you have to work for (money, social status, etc.).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 09:51 PM
1

Your pussy is a part of your body, and you are your body. If your body gets destroyed, you die.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 09:48 PM
1

So, you're validating hypergamy by saying that only the top 20 or whatever else % of men deserve love that is not opportunistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 09:24 PM
1

So, you're validating hypergamy by saying that only the top 20 or whatever else % of men deserve love that is not opportunistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 09:23 PM
1

https://altcensored.com/watch?v=N2KL6F-29FU
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 05:40 PM
5

Give me an example when women don't give a copy paste/Ctrl+C Ctrl+V/NPC reason for this, in which they claim they didn't contribute to it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:44 PM
1

Facts
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:36 PM
6

r/deadbedrooms proves this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:04 PM
22

"Your "maturity" isn't about changing what you're attracted to, it's learning to supplement your lack of attraction with things you logically desire from a partner." Spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:34 PM
4

Not "wanting" the jock anymore isn't maturity, it's just not being able to lock him down, and in turn using a man for additional money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:32 PM
1

"Start improving yourselves" If Johnny Depp, Will Smith, Brad Pitt, etc. couldn't avoid divorce/being cheated on, then what chance do we have?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 11:41 AM
1

"... and "enjoying the decline" and all that bullshit will come out to bite you." Well, some people plan to kill themselves if the collapse comes in our lifetime.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/20 11:07 PM
1

So what? That or prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 11:00 PM
3

Yes and no.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/20 12:00 PM
3

Men long for sacrificial love, but that's male love. Love that is not sacrificial is pointless in most men's eyes, since they love sacrificially.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/20 07:53 AM
9

We could Thanos snap feminism away if men would start identifying as masculine presenting transgender lesbians in mass. If everyone's a woman, then nobody is.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/20 02:48 AM
4

Real love doesn't exist in hetero relationships, because men and women love differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/20 10:57 PM
2

Of course. Even if they don't get solved, women's problems are treated seriously 99% of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 07:19 PM
4

Men won't commit=Chad won't commit to my post-wall ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/20 11:21 PM
1

Except your complaint only applies when women only kinda want to do men's work (without the responsibility).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/20 08:40 AM
1

It still makes them have bad fee-fees. Precisely the reason it shouldn't be abandoned.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/20 05:23 AM
1

You forgot about that most women still depend on men indirectly, since only 30% of women are net taxpayers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/20 03:15 AM
1

Women can give birth in a coma though. Upholding a civilization is not possible that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/20 02:39 AM
1

So, you're a capitalist? If not, then you're a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/20 02:06 AM
1

Except most women still need men (only 30% of women are net taxpayers, so most women still rely on men, just indirectly).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/20 01:37 AM
1

"Young girls don’t want to be pretending to be sexually interested in middle aged men any more than young straight boys want to pretend to be interested in middle aged men." False equivalency. They all don't want to pretend to be interested, but if you're hetero, forcing yourself to have gay sex is worse than forcing yourself to have hetero sex with someone who you think is unattractive. If it wouldn't be a false equivalency, then you would see more hetero men using gay men for betabux.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:09 PM
1

So what? They still have hypergamy, and they still can't love men the same way men love women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 10:18 AM
1

Nah dude, I was totally aware I wasn't a Chad before I even knew what Chad meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:16 AM
1

Man, some people here are cucked. I didn't know that the purple pill was this close to the blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:02 AM
1

Women don't appriciate sex as much because it's so easy for them to get. Also, ugly women only have it rough (at least when it comes to long-term relationships) because of hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 09:14 AM
1

Speak for yourself man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 01:02 AM
0

I think there will be people here debating whether or not looks matter this much though.
/r/askTRP04/03/20 04:43 AM
1

The proof for that is that most women aren't filing for divorce because of abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 01:11 PM
1

The proof for that is that most women aren't filing for divorce because of abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 01:11 PM
1

It's because most men aren't practicing polygyny, but all women are practicing hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 01:07 PM
1

What does your feminist ass is doing here?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 12:28 PM
1

This.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 12:17 PM
0

You can try to deny it all you want, but even after women have been liberated for 100 years, most scientists are still men. If you stop wanting to be a scientist because people at the university say mean things about you, you shouldn't be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 12:09 PM
1

Women today don't select qualities which are beneficial long-term nowadays. Women's instincts, like all instincts, lag behind society/civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 10:48 AM
1

That's not sustainable in developed societies. Developed societies stand on the shoulder of betas getting poon.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 10:39 AM
1

Good genes doesn't mean everything a person with good genes does is good. Women's instincts, like all instincts, lag behind society/civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 10:35 AM
1

Women today don't select qualities which are beneficial long-term nowadays. Women's instincts, like all instincts, lag behind society/civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 10:32 AM
1

Don't give them ideas how to satisfy their hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 02:19 PM
2

THIS. Complete equality among humans is impossible without transhumanism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/20 02:11 PM
1

You'll never be satisfied if you're always looking for a better deal. People shouldn't look for a better deal after they're married, that should take place before marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 01:40 PM
1

This is all just projection.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:16 AM
1

These reasons are actually all "found a better one" except for the second, third and last reason. It's painfully obvious that the forth reason actually means "found a better one" if you can read between the lines for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 11:22 AM
1

Unless there's abuse, cheating or constant fighting, the reason is always that they found someone they consider better.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 11:01 AM
1

These all actually mean that, they're just ashamed to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 10:48 AM
1

"If you can provide a woman with an abundance of tingles while also giving her the ability to achieve her family and lifestyle goals in life with zero economic uncertainty, then she has achieved nirvana, and there's no point to hypergamy." Lol, no, you can be the best man in the world, she won't believe it and still look for a better deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 10:27 AM
1

Just about all dicorces, cheating, sex withholding and nagging can be traced down to that she found. a man she considers better.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 10:10 AM
1

This.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 10:07 AM
1

You'll never be satisfied if you're always looking for a better deal. People shouldn't look for a better deal after they're married, that should take place before marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 10:06 AM
1

Women are less willing to compromise on their hypergamy though. Even chads will shag a post-wall women from time to time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 09:46 AM
1

The risk comes from women. Even chads can fail shit tests, or just do something to become unattractive to a woman, and that can indirectly kill you if you're not careful enough.
/r/askTRP13/01/20 03:28 PM
2

Note: the title is clickbaity.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 01:44 PM
1

Well, to be fair, the age of consent being 18 in the US is a bit weird. It's based on the end of the puberty of boys, while it's 16 in most countries, which is based on the end of the puberty of girls, so 16 makes more sense biologically.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:04 AM
3

"Nothing you said was relevant to men’s rights." Wrong. Socialism/communism and woke bullshit becoming less popular will advance men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:46 PM
1

I would say it's understandable, though it will probably have some unfortunate victims.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:11 PM
1

Look up TFM (Turd Flinging Monkey)on Bitchute, or under the name of Celestina Monkey on Youtube.
/r/MGTOW07/12/19 01:07 PM
1

Because I find the average 50's lifestyle to be more meaninful than the life that you're describing, even if it's more fun sometimes. Sure, we had to provide for them, but they were forced to reciprocate and to be faithful. Now that we don't have that anymore, they became a bunch of entitled cheating thots.
/r/MGTOW07/12/19 07:00 AM
21

I can't describe how happy I will be if this will still barely increase attendance.
/r/MGTOW19/09/19 08:19 PM
-4

Yeah, I know making a woman loyal to you is damn near impossible, but I would still lime to make an attempt.
/r/askTRP07/09/19 04:50 PM
-9

Idk, I don't think pimps are pathetic.
/r/askTRP07/09/19 04:47 PM
-1

I just value loyalty.
/r/askTRP07/09/19 04:46 PM
1

Fucking white knights...
/r/MensRights29/07/19 09:27 AM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDPZYF7GCno
/r/MensRights29/07/19 08:42 AM
2

I'll provide for you if you go back to the kitchen.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 08:29 AM
2

There's middle ground. Constantly looking out for other people without ever looking out for yourself is just as bad as always looking out for just yourself.
/r/MGTOW22/03/19 03:05 PM
8

They know in the back of their minds that our society exists the way it does because men were willing to deal with women's bullshit, and until we have artificial wombs, it will depend on that.
/r/MGTOW21/03/19 03:45 PM
6

As TFM says, bitches bitch.
/r/MGTOW21/03/19 03:29 PM
1

He said it's easier without them, not that it's impossible.
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 09:21 AM
0

The "You get burned..." part of your comment is basically PUA bullshit. The "She won't divorce me because I'm so manly and high status" bullshit. Say that to Channing Tatum, Brad Pitt, etc.. Total packages get divorced too.
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 08:31 AM
1

I guess I shouldn't help girls I'm attracted to more often than I help other people dealing with something (the difference is not big, but I guess I should aim for no difference then).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 10:27 PM
1

So, being frustrated at rejection equals being entitled? If that's so then that means pretty damn close to everyone, if not everyone is entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 02:04 PM
1

You didn't understand my question. I asked why it's a problem if he's frustrated if he doesn't take it out on others. (doesn't lash out at those who reject him).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 08:57 AM
1

So I deserve a life of loneliness if I remain insecure? Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 09:51 PM
1

If he lashes out when he gets rejected, then I can understand why, but why it's a problem that he's frustrated if he's frustrated alone?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 09:32 PM
1

Why it's a problem that he's frustrated about it if he doesn't lash out when he gets rejected?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 09:18 PM
2

Now this is a good comment. That sadly means though that most people will hate me if I'm insecure (which I am), whether I'm an asshole or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 08:55 PM
1

This comes with confidence/social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 03:00 PM
1

"We're barely out of the jungle" mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 02:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter