TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

momentumguy Archive

View 2 posts and 147 comments by momentumguy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's called hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 04:53 PM
7

Your points don't prove what you are saying though. Pointing out the suffering of women doesn't mean men didn't suffer throughout history. Men have always been held as disposable, men were the ones that died and brutally killed in war, they were the one that worked in extremely poor work conditions literally dying in the workplace, the ones that brought food on table in conditions that most people today could never deal with. We can point out plenty of instances where men had worse and your hist…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 10:59 PM
6

I'm not going to elaborate too much on this because it would take too long. The root of modern feminism lie in existentialism, so essentially all critiques applied to that movement apply to feminism also (and there are many such as the lack of an ethical theory that supports the movement). In a more practical sense, feminism fundamentally painted a picture of history that its entirely incorrect. It states that men dominated society and had better lives than women, but this is the furthest thing …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:59 PM
5

Sure, but it also was a movement with blatant misconceptions and misrepresentations. Anyway you have a point, but feminism quickly turned away from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:39 PM
11

What caused it? Feminism first and dating apps second. Both have shifted the relationship between men and women in favour of the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:14 PM
1

I agree, but that's not what you wrote. You said that men are entitled, but in my opinion women are too picky and I disagree with your claim that men don't try. As an example, just go to any gym you will see that the vast majority of people are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 02:27 PM
1

My point is that women are much more picky then men regardless of what men can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 07:35 AM
1

Height stats are clear evidence against this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 09:02 PM
1

I agree with that,but that is clearly a different point. Because then women aren't the prize but they were the prize and your theory holds only because of the evolutionary repercussions of that. In my opinion, men should stop thinking this way even if there is a biological instinct that drive this thought. It's a question of self-respect and I certainly don't respect who they think they are the prize.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 08:58 AM
3

Right this is assuming that end goal of sex must be reproduction, which because of contraceptives is not true anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 04:46 PM
3

Men who say this have never experienced a relationship with mutual attraction. This is true and there are a lot of men that fall in that category.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 01:29 PM
4

You should 100% believe you’re a prize, too Yeah, but there is a difference. Women believe they are the prize because ... they are women, not because of anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 12:57 PM
5

Both genders tend to have impossible standards when it comes to dating. Lol this is absolutely not the case. Women's standards are way higher, practically every study on dating suggest this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 09:07 AM
2

Right but the point is that women initiate the break ups/rejection in the majority of cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 01:35 PM
0

Lol that won't tell you anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 01:33 PM
1

All mass murders motivated by rejection That's simply because men do the vast majority of asking women out, the opposite rarely happens. And obviously men are on average more violent than women. It's hard to say whether the cause of violence is itself the rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 01:32 PM
22

It's a perfect example of hypergamy, but of course women will keep denying it till the end of time because of virtue signalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 01:28 PM
2

I am not sure about this, unless you argue that not caring about a guy being racist makes you racist(which is somewhat agreeable). What I have noticed is that women fuck guys because they are attractive, being an asshole or racist doesn't hinder your chances at all (unless we are talking about LTRs only).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/20 09:58 AM
2

Guy observes "less nice" (confident, cocky, self-assured) guys getting laid. How about guy observes "racist and sexist" guys getting laid? Because I've seen it plenty of times.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/20 08:54 PM
2

Being an asshole isn't too relevant imo as long as you are good looking. As an example, I have witnessed plenty of times women getting with racist guys and bullies. Women being attracted to good looking people never shocked me, but what did was women being attracted to them despite them being shitty people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/20 08:46 PM
1

In a family situation maybe you're right, but the example you gave only applies if you have female siblings imo. In a more general social setting, I disagree with you. In my experience, women are much more likely to push this idea of women being "nice", not just that but women are much more likely to claim to place importance on "niceness" (which is likely to be one of the main reasons for the whole "Nice guy" dilemma).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 12:13 AM
2

Oh ok I see your point. You are saying that women aren't at fault for teaching young men this but society is right? I would argue actually that these teachings are heavily drilled by women principally and less by men. This is probably why a lot of men feel resentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:57 PM
3

If you start teaching kids that washing your hands is bad, many of them will end up believing it's true. Of course, they will eventually realise that it was crap from their experience but it doesn't mean that teaching kids that isn't a cause for their misbelief.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:48 PM
3

I wonder why.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:41 PM
5

This entirely misses the point. The "effect" in question is a reality and a well-established fact in psychological research.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:05 PM
3

Those are generally things of good advice? Yeah you should always be yourself, Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:03 PM
5

That's right, women have the choice and they consistently chose the same small subset of the male population. Average or below average men are hardly allowed to partake in this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:01 PM
1

I don’t believe it’s the major problem that men are making it out to be. I disagree with this, there are other studies done in Europe that show similar trends. My own personal experience tells me that getting sex as a guy is increasingly harder. People who believe that sexual dynamics between men and women haven't changed due to online dating and women's constant push for "sexual freedom" are either delusional or want to push their own narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 12:43 AM
4

I think there is some truth to what you say. However, by starting to ban opinions that don't fit a certain narrative you are effectively preventing yourself to make sure that your own opinions are true. It is very true that sexual dynamics and dating are very nuanced and there can't be universal rules that apply to everyone, however I believe that it is absolutely possible to establish and identify trends in the dating world, and talking about them it's possible and worthwhile.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 06:47 PM
5

No one wants to "browbeat them into submission". The point is simply that in order for you to reach a true conclusion, you must be willing to engage with people that disagree with you. Otherwise you just have an echo chamber, I would say the same if the mods suddenly decided to ban blue pill posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 06:17 PM
10

And debate. You will never know you're right if you are not engaging with people that disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 06:14 PM
14

That's not what I think, but in any case I am not a moderator. You are the one that assuming that they don't. How is that different than what you are accusing me of? How can you ever know if you are wrong if you are unwilling to engage with opinions different than yours, no matter how big the difference of opinion is?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 05:10 PM
27

So essentially you guys don't care about the actual truth and have already decided what you want the narrative to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 04:57 PM
2

It's a question of truth vs illusion of happiness. It depends on what you value more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 04:55 PM
2

Anything below the average height for men, so 5'9"-5'10" and under if you live in the UK or US.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 06:34 AM
2

If he's tall, that's a pretty good sign (of course his face and body can't be below average). Women are almost obsessed with height so casual sex is quite for hard average and below average guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 09:32 PM
2

Are you saying that average or below average men are pumping and dumping women? In what world?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 04:54 PM
3

Right, but see if you go for the top 20 %of men expecting commitment that is inevitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 10:01 AM
3

They might not look for it, but they definitely do end up in that scenario, at least in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 10:32 PM
-1

Most of the time women are openly saying there is a problem blah, blah Lol this is completely not true in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 09:49 PM
3

Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 09:46 PM
-1

Which is worse because it's clear a sign of complete selfishness.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 09:45 PM
1

It has nothing to do with your partner not noticing. It's clear lack of communication and respect from the other person. People aren't mind readers, if you got an issue talk about it, don't be selfish and keep it to yourself. Women do this much more because in my experience they wait until they are sure they have "secured" the guy they want to get with and then pull the trigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 09:43 PM
1

Because they find a decent partner while still with their previous partner. That's called (emotional) cheating and I honestly find it disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 07:09 PM
2

If you are short, it’s your problem to find women who are not into tall heights. Yeah good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 10:59 AM
1

Almost 1/3 of women never get to experience an orgasm, it doesn't mean they don't enjoy sex. On the other there are practically no men who would enjoy sex without orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 09:24 AM
1

Right but women are also more like to enjiy sex without an orgasm than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 07:41 AM
2

People can choose to date whoever they want, but I think it's a bit disingenuous to have a harsh standard that completely excludes more than 70% of the men in the world and then call it a "preference". It's obviously not that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 07:38 AM
2

Well I think it had to with the fact that for some strange reason most of the guys in our social circle were below average, apart from a couple of them. However, she dated/hooked up plenty so it's not like she suffered from it (she was in the rowing team so she eventually got surrounded by tall guys).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 11:14 PM
2

Right, but weight can't be compared to height. And I am not talking about the "fairness" side of it. For 95% of fat people, it is absolutely possible to change your weight through exercise and diet (yes I understand it might be harder for some but it is still possible), so if you are fat it is very likely your fault. It's like complaining that you are don't have a healthy heart yet smoking at the same time. Height is an immutable trait. You're right that tall women can face heightism (I am not n…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 11:01 PM
0

Lol so it's men's fault?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 10:37 PM
3

Tall women face discrimination in the dating arena as well. Hmm perhaps, but the situation is miles better than for short men. Also, pretty much all the tall women I met who cared about height always said that they have a hard time finding tall men to date, while short guys complain about not finding a date at all. In essence, tall women that struggle do so because they are toopicky and unwilling to date men that want them because they too short, while short men are largely disregarded by the ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 10:34 PM
1

A test I use to use to vet a man for marriage was how intimidating they found my dad; That's one of the most childish things I've ever heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 10:29 PM
2

Right, you can date whoever you want. But you have a height requirement not a dating preference which excludes 50% of men based one immutable trait (since height is normally distributed). A preference is something like I prefer brunettes, but doesn't mean I would never give a blonde a chance. Let's call things for what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 10:25 PM
15

Yes, so much this. All these women that explicitly require men to be above a certain height, would absolutely go crazy if the vast majority of men started explicitly spitting out breast size requirements or ass size requirements, there would be countless blog posts and news about how there is dangerous expectation of women's bodies and how porn/media needs to be changed. When it comes to men though, nobody gives a fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 10:21 PM
1

Nice truism, you really added a lot to the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 06:52 PM
5

Yeah, I don't know why people here keep pointing out that women don't enjoy casual sex. At uni, all the girls I knew had many more frequent hookups than the guys (obviously also because they couod do it whenever they wanted).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 06:48 PM
1

So why is male sexlessness higher than female sexlessness amongst young people?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 06:46 PM
3

Lol I always find it amusing that the women in this sub always go on about how women don't value casual sex so men shouldn't see as a privilege and then when it's more convenient they turn their narrative to "women like sex too".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 11:06 PM
2

I don't mind a taller woman, but I think the percentage of women stronger than me would be less than 0.01 % of all women. What I do know is that women are far obsessed with size than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 08:47 PM
1

Thanks for the link, but it doesn't actually prove your point. The study shows that women are less likely to have a short term relationship than men and there is a negative correlation with the number of past sexual partners. However, this can simply be accounted for the fact that women are less willing to have a short term relationship in general, regardless of sexual past. Also the sample size of the study was quite frankly to small to draw anything conclusive: 104 women and 95% of theme were …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 06:00 PM
3

Statistically false, actually. Evidence? Women might not explicitly speak with admiration of players, but they certainly like players because otherwise those men wouldn't be players.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 05:37 PM
1

Yes I think that could be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 04:39 PM
1

No I think, as a man higher n count is a privilege for attractive and tall men, so it's highly correlated with being "high value" to women. Furthermore women view high n count men far more positively than men view high n count women, because women value social status way more than men do. There is a reason why high n count men are called "players", while women who do same are often labelled as "sluts".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 04:27 PM
2

Right but that's not the attitude of a vrry large percentage of women (I would argue the majority).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:53 PM
3

I think yes, women rate men lower because they only find tall (which already rules out a great proportion of men as unattractive) and classically handsome men attractive. When attraction is taken out of the context, they should in theory become more objective in their judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:50 PM
3

Simply because having a high n count in men is an indication that you higher sexual value in the eyes of women. Actually, as many here argue is better to have a high n count as a guy if you want to get laid. High n count in men is not an easy thing to achieve especially if you go attarctive women, completely different story for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:45 PM
2

I slightly disagree, I don't think men define HVM, but only women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 01:11 AM
3

I would say face and height are much more important than frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 12:21 AM
4

I think most men are aware of that, but they are also aware that if you are not tall and fit you don't even have a shot at being a HVM (as defined by the majority of women). Also yes I have seen your use of "some", my point is that defintion is not very relevant if it's not shared by the majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 12:11 AM
3

Not valued as much by who? By society? Perhaps. By women, I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 12:05 AM
6

Right, do you believe that definition that most women use is the one you used in your last sentence?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 11:59 PM
0

Yes, white women generally go for white men or in some cases black men. East/South asian men are hardly ever coupled with white women (because usually they don't fit the Western standards of tall and masculine men)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 12:41 AM
0

I am curious about this one as women here often demonise Tinder because they claim to not value casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 11:53 PM
1

I think sexual violence or the fear of it would be my biggest concern if I was a woman and I really think it's a big fucking deal. Everything else, I honestly believe women have it easier than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 11:41 PM
1

I think the sample size was 3600 people who registered to the events signing up online and the companies organising the event couldn't screen out people. Yes, that suggests that women's pickyness is probably learned and not entirely inherent. I think the women still chose more strictly than men. Anyway, the point is imo this is somewhat good evidence that women are pickier than men when it comes to dating as it even in most situations in real life women are pursued and don't pursue (which resemb…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 09:13 PM
0

What does this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 07:29 PM
1

I agree with you about the importance of a suitable sample size (although in the case of OLD we should also ask ourselves why men are more likely to be found on dating apps, because it might be because they are not as sucessful as their female peers IRL). I was referring to taking the data as it after methodologies and bias in the data has been adressed. For example, if you look at this study where there was an appropriate sample it shows that women pick 20% men for a future second date while me…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 07:22 PM
1

Not really I think, my view is summarised in the last part of my post: One theory I have is that an individual's idea of success is extremely relative. For example, my idea of success would be to become a CEO while for someone poor in Africa, it might to have a home and basic standards of living. However, in our own perspectives we both might view our own life to the same difficulty yet I can very easily rationalise the fact that my life is far easier than the person in Africa. So do women do th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 07:12 PM
1

Yes, I think this answer perfectly captures my perspective as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:57 PM
1

But I am also talking about dating and relationships. I believe that women have the upper hand in both.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:57 PM
1

So you are also of the opinion that women are just pickier and hence perceive dating to be difficult?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:53 PM
1

Thanks, I fixed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:34 PM
10

I mean I really don't think this is true. I have known plenty of guys who wanted a relationship, but were neven given the opportunity or were rejected by the women they asked out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:25 PM
1

Sure, how is that relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:23 PM
3

But that's assuming that most women would have sex with most men, which doesn't need to happen (imo it doesn't).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:22 PM
1

Sure, I think that is a somewhat fair description. It still doesn't answer the question though, when you deny something that means you are engaging with the question being posed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:20 PM
4

But isn't that just saying that women are much pickier?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:17 PM
5

If men value sex more than women, then why is it that amongst young people sexlessness is higher in men?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:14 PM
1

I don't think such a "meta-analysis" is possible, because the scope of such analysis is simply too big (I mean in scientific terms). However, this doesn't the data we have is meaningless or should be ignored. I agree to some extent with you that the interpretation of data can be quite tricky, for example in the data about sexlessness in men, it is difficult to assess the root cause of the issue (although it's perfectly possible to formulate conjectures that might be not actively supported by evi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 04:37 PM
7

You are countering statstical data with your own distorted personal experience. You are literally saying that half of Asian women have no standards and marry ugly guys, this is very far from reality. As for black women, I think there is bias against black women, but also the opposite is also true. black women also hardly consider interracial partners (like the OkCupid shows). Your point about black men not wanting black women pales, when you compare to the Asian american situation where literall…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 03:17 PM
3

Studies on speed dating, online dating, sexlessness in men, studies about height requirements all seem to somewhat confirm OP's suggestion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 12:41 PM
14

Lol, do you know that 54% of Asian American women marry outside their race their to mostly white men? (yes marriage not ons or flings) While the same percentage for white women and asian men is much much lower? That alone is enough to dismiss your claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 10:54 AM
11

So why do white men go for asian women much more often than white women go for asian men?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 10:41 AM
9

That's ridiculous. You are showing a picture of an interracial couple to prove what??? And on the eye colour thing what does got to do with race???
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 10:34 AM
7

You are wrong about the interracial dating part, it's actually the opposite. White men are far more likely to date interracially than white women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 09:14 AM
0

Is this a personal opinion or do you have some evidence for this "number 1 number 2 theory"?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 09:05 AM
1

Right that makes sense. But then I can't help but think that it is just a question of vanity and not really about attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:49 PM
9

30-40% are shockingly high just like you said. You can't dismiss that because it doesn't affect the majority of people. Also, it's not like the other 60-70% have great sex/romantic lives either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:21 PM
1

Isn't that the same logic you used for not wanting short kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:14 PM
9

What does that got to do with what I asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:13 PM
2

In terms of looks? This can happen. In terms of socioeconomic status, the chances are very low (this is true in practically all countries in the world). Women might date "equals" but they hardly date a man that has lower social status or financial status (although the latter is more likey than the former).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:12 PM
3

But are those symptoms or causes?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:03 PM
1

That's like saying you don't date black guys because you don't want black children as they might have it harder in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:01 PM
2

There are trends in real life (like the rise in sexlessness in men and the change is sexual dynamics due to OLD and womens socioeconomic status) that affects 100% of the population. The idea what is being discussed here is irrelevant to the majority of the population is simply false.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:00 PM
2

Agreed to some extent. The question then becomes apparent, why are there so many men here in that situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 10:51 PM
5

Lol in my experience short women tend be more obsessed with height than taller women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 10:46 PM
4

Do you have friends who only date short guys? Height is normally distributed and the vast majority of women want (even require) average/above average heitht men. Yes, women might like different kind of men but there are features like height or penis size that are universally desired amongst women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:38 AM
4

The 80/20 rule is not based on Tinder exclusively, thats just where it is apparent. Online dating statistics, data about sexlessness in men, speed dating and height, all point towards it. Exceptions or anecdotal experience doesn't invalidate the rule (which is a general guideline not a set in stone law).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:17 AM
1

That's great. Although I disagree with you, your weight loss will absolutely make you prettier and more attractive. Men don't really select for uncontrollable (genetics) things to the same extent as women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 12:17 AM
2

All you need is stop being fat and improve your health.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 02:06 PM
1

There is no way in this world that your husband at that height will get the same attention as a good looking 6'3'' guy, the majority of men require women to be above a certain height.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 07:08 AM
1

What you are asking is naive and impossible to achieve. Suppose you live in an area with extremely high crime rate, it would be stupid and foolish to dismiss that statistics and act if that is irrelevant. In that area, you shouldn't go out at night alone and you should be suspicious od people in general. You wouldn't go live there and say: "oh individuals are individuals, I am going to assume nothing and I won't judge people based on the data I've seen".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 07:04 AM
1

You haven't answered my question about what do you think the principle of uniformity of nature asserts because I am quite convinced that you really don't know what you are talking about. Scientific theories CANNOT be proven and the idea of proof you underlined can only apply to mathematical theorems, but not to scientific theories. And your idea of proof of scientific theories, completely fail to account for Gettier cases which are taught in any first course of epistemology, which you clearly ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 10:22 PM
1

I am not sure what your background is, but it is clear to me you are not familiar with the history of philosophy of science. Since you are mentioning euclidean and non-euclidean geometry, I assume you have some background in Physics or Maths. Nothing in science can ever be proven, because scientific theories are based on induction to which deduction is only applied later on. The problem with the statistical interpretation of scientific theories is that in order to be valid we would have to know …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 06:43 PM
1

This is why our public education needs to be reformed. This blatant and blind scientism is quite unhealthy. The principle of uniformity of nature cannot be proven statistically, actually it cannot be proven at all. There is plenty of material you can read about this in the philosophy of science (Hume and Kuhn in primis). If you think you can prove the principle through maths you are completely lost, no inductive principle can be proven through maths. This is a well known problem in philosophy, s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 01:43 PM
1

Not actually true, there are things in science that cannot be justified through data. Example: principle of uniformity of nature. Scientific theories are actually based on more than simple inference of data, many theories simply rely on the fact that they haven't been falsified
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 08:27 AM
2

Women have more optioms... I don't know about that. Depends on the person. Yeah, but that's a truism. A woman in general will have many more guys willing to date her than vice versa. There are studies that suggest that women usually have a 50% of chance being picked by a man and for men that percentage is 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 08:09 AM
2

I mean anecdotally speaking I have had the opposite experience, the guys I know who hookup regularly are all tall and somewhat decent looking. Also OP was talking about hookups and the riding the "Chad cock", so this is not really about people looking for serious relationships (on which I think women still have the upper hand because men actually don't control relationships like you said, women do because they have more options).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 08:00 AM
3

Men aren't surprised because women fuck Chads, but they are surprised by the fact that women expect them to be with them when they get older because their young lifestyle is not affordable anymore and expect men to not care about their past.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 07:55 AM
3

No, men would do it if they had the possibility, but the reality is that possibility only exist for a small percentage of men (tall and decent looking).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 07:52 AM
1

Those are statistics are based on self-reported data and I am more than convinced that women have a harder time admitting their cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 08:36 PM
1

It has to do with the age group as OP mentions. Women in their 20s cheat more (probably even more than the statistics say) than men in their 20s (which are the most relevant years for dating).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 03:15 PM
2

The odds of finding a good partner are always low no matter what platform you are using. However, online dating platform provides women with a huge pool of men who are willing to date them. The bigger your dating pool the more likely you are going to find what you like and this is why online dating is much more suited for women than men. I mean dating statistics clearly show that the most common way of finding partners is bars and online dating, and on those platforms women have a huge advantage…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 08:17 AM
1

Oh girls can also easily find bfs (I have know at least 4) on that app but for a guy that is much harder. Although you are right, that isn't the main purpose of the app.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 07:51 AM
1

It's because men expect their experience to be some what similar to girls, who can get laid on Tinder in hours. It's a dumb strategy because most people are not aware of the difference in sexual dynamics between the genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 07:33 AM
7

It is indication of the fact that young women have it much easier than young guys in terms of opportunities. In my life I have met several girls who use Tinder despite being in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 07:23 AM
1

It might be, but your experience alone doesn't dictate that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 09:52 PM
2

So your experience generalises to the majority of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 04:36 PM
2

For those asking for my trading card stats, I’m 5”11’, 6 ft with boots on. 200lbs. Spent years developing a muscular build. I’ve been told I look exotic. I say I’m a mutt, 10 different nationalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:20 AM
0

Feminists fight for the rights of all women This is laughable at best. Some feminists might do, but the vast majority of self-proclaimed feminists appear to me as simply not giving a fuck about women who are in a real situation of need.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 05:18 PM
11

Yeah well for women basically the vast majority of men suck then.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/20 10:45 PM
3

I haven't seen data on this, although there is data that indicate that young men are having less sex than young women. Also I agree with this view because in my personal experience matches it. Guys struggle for sex way more than girls do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/20 07:53 AM
2

I think he referred to most women not all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/20 07:50 AM
2

Sure just type in conditional mating height on Google.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 02:54 PM
-1

Except this is not true (example studies in height which is normally distributed).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 10:21 AM
3

in relationships Maybe in hook-up Oh absolutely no way, to get casual sex as a guy you have to be tall/above average height and at least have a half decent face and that excludes more than 50%of men. Pretty much any girl can get casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 06:46 AM
-2

Just because you don't think about them, doesn't mean leagues don't exist. Women absolutely behave as they do much more than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 06:43 AM
5

She's an outlier I mean to give you an example there are studies that show that 65% of women refuse to date a guy below 5'7''. Clearly for those the height of a man is a requirement and hence it comes before everything else. So I am not sure if your outlier theory is actually true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 06:18 AM
1

Being curvy is different than being obese Sure, but there is a significant overlap between the two. Also men have similar obesity percentages and it's not like women don't exclude those men too. Even then 41% is a number that pales in comparison to the 90% cited above. I would like to also point out that weight is something completely within your control (at least for 99% of people) and can be changed with will power, so I am not sure if the two things are really comparable and I am not sure if …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 08:38 PM
3

Hmm not really. It's true that some men have an active preference for slim women, but it's not comparable to the extent of women's criteria about height (studies about height show this). As someone who has interacted with people of many different cultures (I have lived in 4 different countries), I can say that men are much less fussy about the weight of a woman than the women are about height (unless we are talking about obese/anorexic people). As an example, in the area I currently live most me…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 08:26 PM
0

You should probably ask yourself why you think your disapproval means anything to us at all. you can't all get the adoration of tall male models. Oh from your replies I am certain that what I am saying means nothing to you and I wouldn't expect someone with your attitude to understand much anyway. Keep citing your non-sensical mantras of truth and "female empowerment", I hope they take you far in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 07:40 PM
2

Who cares what the stats are? Hmm the people that are affected by such stats? Sexual attraction is not something that can be lectured Sexual attraction is very much dependent on social conditioning (and biology) This is why women don't bother. Wrong, women don't bother because they like to virtue signal and love to promote themselves in a positive light in any way they can. Why even ask if the truth is unacceptable I personally don't need to ask the truth about height as there are studies that c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 07:09 PM
3

Sure cancer is also more difficult to overcome what does that even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 01:37 PM
1

True, but height requirements are way harsher and more common than ass or breast requirements (actually I cannot recall meeting any guy who had them).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 01:34 PM
2

Yeah I agree with some of that, but let's not divert from the idea that height requirements are statistically ridiculous and women are incredibly uncompromising when it comes to height. If you were a short guy, there are very high chances that your life experience will shape in a way such that you would be complaining too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 01:31 PM
17

Ah the perks of being a woman. Being able to exclude 90% of the dating pool based on one single physical feature and still be able to date successfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 01:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter