monkeysclaw Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
4	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill	Meta	monkeysclaw	/r/TheRedPill	27/01/16 03:10 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill Your analogy falls apart when you recall that Nature is made of both inorganic and living organic matter. 99.99% of everything in the universe is inanimate or in popular terms 'dead'. When people normally use the word Nature (as in the Universe and everything in it) they normally do not mean the 0.01% of it that has life they mean everything else. Further, Nature as a whole is not a tool for man to use; the converse is true. No Nature is indeed a tool for man to use and man has been using Nature…	/r/TheRedPill	01/02/16 07:16 PM
1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill Jesus was alpha. Christianity used to be powerful and turn many betas into alphas. These two statements are so laughably false you seem to have misunderstood Christianity as much as it is intellectually possible to do so. Jesus and his followers were not Alpha and in fact not even Beta. They were Omegas. Jesus himself was a poor middle aged virgin who was short and ugly and his teachings are Beta max. Christianity was juxtaposed as slave morality against the master morality of pagan Romans and t…	/r/TheRedPill	01/02/16 06:52 PM
1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill The church condemned slavery in the 4th century and required that Christians free their slaves upon death. It also launched campaigns for purchasing slaves and freeing them. Finally it weighed on the emperor and the knights to prevent new enslavement. By the early Middle Ages slavery was extinct in Christian lands. This is 100% spot on and correct. The early Christians (during the time Rome was still predominantly Pagan) were the first to argue for the increasingly humane treatment of current sl…	/r/TheRedPill	01/02/16 06:26 PM
1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill (Edit: Nature cares about you.) This is completely false. Nature is amoral and inanimate. Therefore it is incapable of caring about anything or anyone. This statement is as patently false as claiming a car cares about you or a rock cares about you or your house cares about you. Nature not only cares about you; it is designed to force you to reach your full potential Again completely false statement because if nature was designed to force every being to reach their full potential we would all be …	/r/TheRedPill	29/01/16 09:42 PM
1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill First off thanks for the insightful reply helping to keep the signal-to-noise ratio up. I think I disagree with you on this, but I am not entirely sure I get your main point. Could you explain more concisely? My point was that secularized Christians in the West follow all the moral guidelines, rules, and commandments of Christianity such as pity, tolerance, and knightly behavior towards women while simultaneously being incredibly irreligious and in many cases attacking the Christian religion its…	/r/TheRedPill	28/01/16 06:48 PM
1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill feminism once female nature came out of the bottle. And they were given equality with us they decided to mold males into betas. Simply more women let in schools the more beta males are created. Women (in general) did not mold men into Betas. It was caused by a convolution of those 3 factors I talk about going into overdrive. And I fail completely to see how women being educated leads to Betas given that many countries (Syria, Cuba, Russia, Ukraine, China and others) educate women in the same sch…	/r/TheRedPill	28/01/16 05:38 PM
1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill Rebuttal of mid-summary: To state that Nature does not care about a human being reaching their full potential is dogmatically Darwinian. It sounds cool but has no basis in reality. One need only look at the exponential nature of population growth, via the constraints set on population growth by law of population growth, and hence the idealistically unlimited propogation of one's genetic code. I'm going to need clarification on that as I am not exactly clear as to what you are getting at. My poin…	/r/TheRedPill	28/01/16 05:17 PM
1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill First off thanks for the insightful reply helping to keep the signal-to-noise ratio up. It's a double edged sword. Secularized Christianity is also the philosophical underpinning behind the seemingly unlimited technological development experienced in western society I wholeheartedly agree. The fact that it happens to churn out Betas by the boatload is a manageable (or not so manageable) side-effect. [Science’s] once feeble vanguards, often trampled down, often perishing in isolation, have now be…	/r/TheRedPill	28/01/16 04:36 PM
2	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill First off thanks for the insightful reply helping to keep the signal-to-noise ratio up. I disagree with you very heavily in regards to Christianity. From having studied it for many years, I have come to the conclusion that it is a literal manual for creating betas I do not disagree with you. Christianity is in our words Beta in that it posits Beta Slave Morality over the Alpha Master Morality of the old pagans and over the mixed slave/master morality of the Jews. It is a divide between the old m…	/r/TheRedPill	28/01/16 04:08 PM
3	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill He went further then just calling me a faggot. He insinuated that because I was according to him a pretentious r /iamverysmart thesaurus carrying douche bag I was therefore not entitled to point out shit comments. Regardless the issue is over as the original poster deleted the comment conceding my point that he was just blowing hot air.	/r/TheRedPill	28/01/16 03:37 PM
2	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill Jesus, I didn't mind your post - but your response is hilariously insecure. Some true r / iamverysmart shit. Put down the thesaurus, pal. He didn't say anything remotely juvenile, he just had a differing opinion. If you want a hugbox, go visit r / relationships. A snarky ad hominem attack. I guess it's easier to do that then take the time to read and comment on the actual post. I simply pointed that his was a shit comment that seemed to be written on the sly in an attempt to simply comment for t…	/r/TheRedPill	27/01/16 07:25 PM
-1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill This is the last reply I will make to your commentary. As I said before your Marxist conception of conflict has been thoroughly and completely debunked and intellectually destroyed for decades and collapsed along with the Soviet Union that gave birth to it. You are the equivalent of a Neo-Nazi using debunked pseudo-scientific theories from the 19th century to justify racialism except even more cringe worthy because you wrap your comments in a mystical cloak of Dark Enlightenment. You are intelle…	/r/TheRedPill	27/01/16 04:45 PM
2	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill I am not sure you have understood my post. I disagree with you on a less ideological level This is not a coherent sentence that make sense. I agree with you that our species is as weak as its ever been I have never talked about the human race as a whole only about the WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic) countries who only make up only 10 to 15% of the global population. The rest of mankind's outlook towards life has been basically unchanged since the Middle Ages. Extre…	/r/TheRedPill	27/01/16 04:21 PM
-1	Philosophical Underpinnings of The Blue Pill Full Break Stop. Thucydides in his History of the Peloponnesian War outlines what has been known since time immemorial and is inherent in human conflict in that wars are fought for a mix of three main motives: honour, fear and self-interest (profit). This Marxist conception of conflict (wars are fought only for capitalistic and economic reasons) has been thoroughly debunked. Keep the conspiracy theories and tin-foil hat at home. This is for serious discussion.	/r/TheRedPill	27/01/16 03:52 PM
8	AskWomen user hooks up with a hot, mysterious man - who turns out to be a criminal gangster. Who's surprised? This is ancient knowledge and if more of the youth was educated in the classics no one would be even slightly moved by AskWomen posts like this. It has been known since time immemorial that there are men who are good at being men and there are good men. Men who are good at being men have what the Romans’ called virtus that is to say that they are manly, courageous, dominant, and aggressive and other Alpha traits. Men who are good men have the Christian virtues of love, hope, faith, prudence, tem…	/r/TheRedPill	21/01/16 03:57 PM
12	The thing Jared Rutledge did wrong was apologize. This my friends is why the RedPill goes beyond PUA tactics into changing the very soul of a man to cause a revolution in his thinking about male-female gender dynamics that will allow him to proudly stand up to scrutiny and opposition not completely collapse and retreat back to his Beta programming the moment he is called to account by any half-wit ‘gurl’ feminist. A RedPiller would have stood strong to pull a Trump using all his fervent belief and newly acquired knowledge to give him the fortit…	/r/TheRedPill	20/01/16 07:53 PM