TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

moonflower Archive

View 0 posts and 121 comments by moonflower on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

It wasn't a false accusation - he admitted that he did it - the reason he pleaded not guilty was because he believes there is nothing wrong with him slobbering on the lips of a stranger without their permission
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:59 AM
2

Yes, that's probably the most relevant aspect of the story, if he never realised that he was dealing with a male person - maybe he would have behaved differently if the person had been clearly male - we can't know though
/r/MGTOW23/08/18 12:07 PM
4

Yes, and I saw screenshots of deleted Tweets where this person appears to be strongly suggesting they are actually male
/r/MGTOW23/08/18 08:14 AM
4

biologically male - I don't know what point you are trying to make by quoting that one word ...?
/r/MGTOW23/08/18 08:11 AM
23

There is some evidence to suggest that this person was actually male
/r/MGTOW22/08/18 09:48 AM
1

I've been discussing this in the UK subreddit, and was surprised to see it posted here - what men's rights do you think are being ignored by this issue?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 03:35 PM
0

So you would be ok with your daughters being imprisoned with males who had been convicted of rape and violence?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 08:33 AM
-3

Being locked in prison with violent males is not the same as sharing a nice civilised mixed sauna though, is it
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:09 PM
-6

Do you all hate females so much that you want them to be locked in prison with males? Don't any of you have sisters or daughters that you care about?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:55 PM
-2

So you're all in here celebrating that males now have the right to be housed in a female prison?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 07:49 PM
2

Then I think your theory is fundamentally flawed, because you make the assumption that a male will only impregnate a female with the expectation that he will expend his own resources on the subsequent offspring, when in reality that is not the case
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:47 PM
2

Surely if a female has given birth previously, she has proved her fertility and that would make her attractive to males? As far as I know, in the other primate species, the males do not avoid the females when they are apparently fertile - quite the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:38 PM
0

Yes, I got that, and then when you followed it with ''Oh my god did rps just say that all women want to be raped?'' I explained how it looks like you are implying that all women want to be raped ... I used an example to illustrate how you are making a connection between a desired situation and an undesired side effect ... and then when you replied with ''So that must be why I used the words I did, instead of not the words I did. Good job sherlock.'' it was confusing because then I didn't know if…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 03:01 PM
3

I don't understand what you mean there - do you mean that you do think all women want to be raped?
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 01:50 PM
2

To be fair, it did very much look like you were saying all women want to be raped ... to illustrate how that happened, it would be like saying ''All men want to be wealthy enough to be brutally assaulted and robbed in the street'' ... do you see how it makes a connection between a desired situation and an undesired side effect? It might be accurate to say ''All women want to be attractive'' but, by definition, it is not even possible for a woman to want to be raped. I know there is a lot of talk…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 10:45 AM
2

The easiest and most effective way is to correct misinformation as and when you see it being being promoted ... it can become a lifelong habit :)
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:19 AM
15

They start as they mean to go on, with a tone of dismissing valid concerns
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:45 PM
1

I preferred your previous post which you deleted while I was answering, this one is just sarcasm which only serves to end the discussion
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:49 AM
1

I'm not saying MensRights are dismissing the concerns of any group, I'm asking if there is an ulterior motive behind their support of trans women
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:22 AM
1

An ''egalitarian'' group would consider the needs of all groups, they wouldn't take sides with one group and dismiss the concerns of another group
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:26 AM
1

The different types of 'feminist' groups who have different definitions of 'woman'
/r/MensRights23/01/13 12:20 AM
2

I don't visit here very often, but I would guess it depends much more on what opinions are expressed rather than the gender of the one posting those opinions
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:31 PM
0

It's interesting that MensRights tends to take the side of trans women when there is a conflict between them and female-born women, and I'm wondering if that is because they perceive female-born radical feminists to be the worst man-hating enemy?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 11:51 AM
2

I already assumed that women would be welcome to support men's rights, just as men are welcome to support women's rights ... perhaps the question is more like ''Am I welcome in this particular men's rights community?'' Some would say that women are welcome here, and some would make women feel very unwelcome, so it comes down to individual experience
/r/MensRights21/01/13 11:02 AM
2

For a lot of people, their first encounter with the word 'cis' is in the context of ''Die Cis Scum'' and they ask what it means and they discover that someone is wishing death upon them because of their gender identity, and then they see it used as a derogatory term, over and over again, and it doesn't matter how ''neutral'' it was originally intended to be, if it is mostly used in a derogatory manner, they are not going to like using the word to describe themselves
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:50 PM
0

I misunderstood you then, I thought you were putting forward a case for allowing prisoners to vote ... and it seems you don't understand what ''tends to be'' means: it's a kind of general statement, which gives an overall view, like ''men tend to be taller than women'' ... I was agreeing with you :)
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:12 PM
2

I don't make assumptions about your views based on what subreddit we happen to be talking in
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:03 PM
0

ok, that's fair enough if you think prisoners should be given the right to vote, it was just a bit of a digression from the topic ... and yeah, I agree the courts do tend to be softer on women when they are passing sentence
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:01 PM
2

If that is the case in your country then that is an inequality in favour of women, yes, but don't you think the right to vote should be a separate issue from that of compulsory military service?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:51 PM
0

Do you think prisoners should have the right to vote? And/or do you think it is some form of discrimination which causes a huge majority of prisoners to be men? I'm not sure what you're getting at there
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:40 PM
-1

You might have a stronger argument there if it had ever been the case that only those in the Military Reserve and ex-Military Reserve were entitled to vote ... but if a man was disabled since childhood, he was still entitled to vote but not called up for military service; he was entitled to vote simply on the grounds of being born male
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:09 PM
2

It would have been a good reason for a Men's Rights movement, yes, but the assertion here was that the Men's Rights movement was needed as a counter to the Women's Rights movement: to quote directly: ''A men's movement was needed on the first day that a women's movement was started''
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:17 PM
2

I just this very moment addressed that issue in this thread :)
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:42 PM
4

I see those as separate issues, not that ''you only deserve to vote if you are male, because only males are called up to the military'' because all men were given the vote, not only those who would be called up ... they did not refuse to give a man the vote if he was unfit for military duty ... he got the vote on the grounds of being born male
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:40 PM
3

How about: ''Asked me what I wanted to be tagged as, then tagged me as smartass'' haha
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:06 PM
0

I don't actually have RES, I have to make a mental note, and it usually ends up as personality, like ''friendly'' or ''batshit unreasonable'' ... but I was just interested to know what you would choose as a tag for yourself
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:30 PM
1

What would you like your tag to say?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:14 PM
9

Back in the days when women were campaigning for the right to vote in government elections, I don't see how that necessitated a ''Men's Rights'' countermovement?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:46 PM
2

''best not to make assumptions about this one''
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:12 PM
2

My best guess would be a case of mis-labelling on your part ... where did you get that idea from in the first place?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:57 PM
5

I get the impression there are now different branches of feminism which are fiercely battling each other ... they don't even agree on what the definition of ''woman'' is any more, and some of the female-born women are feeling that the feminist movement is being taken over by male-born women, and some of the male-born women are feeling excluded
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:45 PM
11

Probably because a Men's Rights movement has never been needed until now ... if you are young, then your generation is the one which will create the ''Men's Rights'' course
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:21 PM
9

I think the feminist movement in countries such as UK and USA has reached an interesting stage where the important battles have been fought and won, such as votes for women and equal pay etc, but there are some feminists who enjoy the fight and want to keep on finding new things to fight for, so their battles become more and more absurd and trivial, and are also starting to make men feel disadvantaged and discriminated against So when you are talking with one of these feminists who doesn't reali…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:50 AM
1

But she said ''men'' and not ''people'' as if the parenting classes are for men, because a woman would not need such classes?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:41 AM
1

I was asking about marketing spam, but never mind, this is going nowhere
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:36 AM
1

But do you approve of it being filtered out by default?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:26 AM
1

How about marketing spam, should that be allowed? so we have to wade through pages of adverts to get to the cute cat pics?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:20 PM
1

I think you would have a hard time convincing anyone that pics of cute cats are immoral
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:11 PM
1

Don't you have any opinions on what should be allowed to be posted on reddit?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:55 AM
1

Do you think I am forcing anyone to do anything here?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:13 PM
1

Don't you have any opinions on what is moral and what is not?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:04 PM
1

You seem to be confused between ''legal'' and ''moral''
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:53 PM
2

agreed on all counts :)
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:40 PM
-2

And the whole point of taking creepshots is that the victim is unaware of it and therefore unable to stop you or to retaliate ... you can't be ''proactive'' at the scene if you don't even know it's happened until it's too late Anyway, you could consider it being ''proactive'' to speak out against this behaviour on reddit and thereby adding to the number of voices who are agreeing that it is immoral
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:10 PM
-2

And you still haven't showed me where I am forcing my morals on anyone ... all you are doing now is slipping into obscenity because you fear that I might
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:59 PM
-2

Where have I dictated anyone's legal actions? I have no political power ... but it's very telling that you would feel ''bullied'' if they took away your right to violate innocent people
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:43 PM
-2

Your whole tone is one of blaming the victim, when you say ''if women really want to stop people from taking their pictures'' ... you are placing the responsiblity on the victims to fight back by doing things they might not want to do, instead of condemning the creeps
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:40 PM
-2

You say you are imposing nothing on me, but you are supporting those who might take creepshots of me or my loved ones ... the victims of those creeps were minding their own business And what ''bullying tactics'' do you think I support? Where have I said anything like that? Or do you think it is ''bullying'' you when I express my opinion about the immorality of these creepshots?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:35 PM
-2

It is the intention which is immoral, yes ... and I don't have to draw the line in enforcing it because I'm not enforcing it ... and I don't agree with your solution because the victim shouldn't have to retaliate, the victim shouldn't have to do anything ... you are placing blame and responsibility on the victim instead of on the creep
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:27 PM
-2

How exactly am I ''imposing'' my morals on you? Surely you are just as much ''imposing'' your morals on me? And how exactly am I ''dangerous'' to you?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:21 PM
-3

You seem to be devoid of empathy and compassion
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:53 PM
-1

No, you didn't read the full definition
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:46 PM
-1

My morality doesn't define yours, I don't know what you mean by that
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:17 PM
-5

How can a person choose to not be a victim of a creepshot photographer? Stay indoors and never go outside? Wear a full burka at all times outside?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:16 PM
-3

Legal is not the same as moral ... it might be legal, but it is still immoral
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:02 PM
-1

And I would say yes it is immoral to take someone's photo without their permission and to post it on the internet for the purpose of leching on them or laughing at them or anything else which they would not like
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:01 PM
-1

The big difference is consent ... the photos on gonewild are taken with consent, and the photos on creepshots are without consent
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:16 AM
2

I found this one whole day after you posted ... I'm interested to know what you think of all the responses you got from both sides, and if you still think it is possible to build bridges between SRS and MR? I agree that on both sides there are those who focus on the worst excesses of ''the opposition'' and extrapolate that to the whole group Your last paragraph, beautiful :)
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:08 PM
7

It's only a matter of terminology ... ''rape'' has a very specific meaning in law, and all other similar non-consented acts would be just as serious and just as illegal and called ''sexual assault''
/r/MensRights28/07/12 09:55 AM
3

I think there are a lot of women, including me, who support both women's rights and men's rights ... I know there are extremists on both sides who try to make it a ''men versus women'' war, but there are also a lot of people on both sides who hold to the ideal of a society where men and women value each other and treat each other with respect and consideration
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:13 AM
3

I know, I did read that already, I was just thinking how else it could be useful :)
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:57 PM
3

This bot would be useful in subreddits with oppressive moderation where self posts are frequently removed, because the text is no longer displayed after the submission has been removed
/r/MensRights16/03/12 11:14 AM
4

If there is a subreddit battle, then the mods of r/LGBT started it by making scornful comments about r/MensRights
/r/MensRights16/03/12 11:07 AM
12

I have no idea what this International Women's Day is, but thank you, it's nice that women are welcomed in r/mensrights ... I think it is perfectly possible to support both men's rights and women's rights, one does not have to choose to support only one or the other Everyone benefits when men and women work together for the good of us all :)
/r/MensRights09/03/12 12:09 PM
8

You just said this: You guys shouldn't be competing for "Who suffers more" trophies But isn't that exactly what you are doing when you defend SRS? You defend their hateful sexism when you say ''SRS main point is to make you mad, make you feel marginalized, and make you know what it's like to be objectified like women'' And this indicates that you have competed for the trophy of ''who suffers more'' and awarded it to women and then used it in some hateful twisted logic to condone appalling behavi…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:26 AM
1

I wasn't attempting to achieve anything with those particular people; our comments are being read by silent readers who may be led to think about some things in a new way :)
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:53 PM
1

I don't ''expect'' everyone to be polite, but I have the right to set personal boundaries in discussion by saying ''if you don't behave in a civil manner, that is the end of this discussion'' People need to learn that their behaviour has consequences on the way they relate to others, even if they have the right to behave badly
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:32 PM
1

I guess I would get banned then ... you seem to be suggesting, albeit politely, that I should either keep my opinions to myself or get out of here
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:17 PM
1

Yeah sure, but if you do it on a public forum, you can expect people to correct any false generalizations you make ... if you went into a feminist forum and saw a woman saying ''all men are selfish cheating bastards'' would you try to persuade everyone to refrain from correcting her and give her some leeway because of her few bad relationships? I don't think it helps anyone, to allow them to create a hateful echo chamber
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:59 PM
1

Oh ok, I thought you meant giving leeway to hate speech and death wishes ... but even so, do you really think it helps them if they say awful things about ''all women do this and that'' and no-one corrects them?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:50 AM
1

Yes, it seems that there are more and more sock puppets on reddit these days, play acting the role of an angry extremist of one kind or another I don't think it helps them to give them ''leeway'' to speak with such vileness, even if they have genuine reason to feel hurt and defensive, it is not acceptable to speak with such hate, and issue death wishes, and to expect the other person to overlook it
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:31 AM
1

I don't actually go around calling myself a feminist, even though I support equal rights ... I do fit the description of feminist, but also fit the description of men's rights advocate ... I'm just getting the feel of what proportion of this forum are unreasonable women-haters, and they seem to be in the minority, but perhaps a large minority, what would you say?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:11 AM
2

Oh I totally agree that there are far fewer women who want to be the provider in the relationship, but those women have the same lack of potential partners when looking for a man who wants to stay at home and take care of babies all day
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:08 AM
0

I didn't ''lose'' any argument, I was having a discussion, a sharing of views, not an argument ... and I'm sure I won't be staying long if there are too many like you here
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:15 AM
0

That's fine, I have no wish to discuss with such horribly aggressive people anyway ... also he changed his comment so you may not have seen what he said
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:07 AM
1

[reply deleted because he changed his comment]
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:48 PM
0

I'm not clicking on that - if you have something to say to me, you can say it yourself
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:23 PM
7

How can you say that men don't have the option of choosing when there are stay-at-home husbands? And if you don't retract your awful insults, that will be the end of this discussion, I don't think death wishes are appropriate
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:22 PM
2

This is where I diverge from the extremist feminists, because I support the equal right to do those jobs if they have the ability, but I believe that fewer women want to do those jobs, and it's not the fault of men at all
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:17 PM
6

I think you are confusing equal rights and equal roles ... a provider-and-housewife partnership can have equal rights ... they can both support the rights of themselves and others to choose the opposite roles in their partnership
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:37 PM
6

Oh well I won't argue with you ''wimminthink'' haha
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:33 PM
5

Yes, that happens a lot ... society is driven by men and women, even societies where women are oppressed, for example muslim mothers who force their daughters to wear the full veil, then the men get all the blame
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:23 PM
3

Yes I don't think quotas are good for business, because it means that if only 10% of the applicants are women, then all the female applicants will be given a job, even if they are unsuitable ... real equality is when applicants are chosen on their individual merits, regardless of gender
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:20 PM
11

They are probably a minority of women, and it's probably better to avoid those when looking for a partner :)
/r/MensRights12/02/12 03:59 PM
5

But if women have the right to do the same highly paid jobs as men, and most simply choose not to, surely that is no cause for complaint from feminists?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 03:57 PM
2

Thank you ... even if most couples are living together as provider-and-housewife though, surely they would usually have the same standard of living conditions as each other?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 03:26 PM
4

What do you mean by 'equality of outcome' here?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 03:03 PM
9

Wanting equal rights for women doesn't preclude also wanting a man to be a provider ... a couple can support equal rights while also choosing to engage in a traditional provider-and-housewife partnership ... they would support the right of other couples to choose a provider-and-househusband partnership
/r/MensRights12/02/12 02:12 PM
72

You would probably find that the women who complain about society being a ''patriarchy'' are not usually the same women as those who are looking for a man to be a provider There isn't a view which ''women'' hold, they are very different and can hold opposite views to each other
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:44 PM
2

If this was ordinary tasteful porn, I would think she was over-reacting, but you mentioned you like looking at ''gangbangs'' ... so what was the image which she saw on your screen? There's a big difference between enjoying looking at attractive women, and enjoying looking at women being abused
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:40 PM
4

I think a lot of them are men actually
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:39 AM
1

I've noticed that a lot of the forums which are devoted to campaigning for the rights of a group are very quick to ban people who don't agree with certain opinions of those who appoint themselves to represent the group, even if the banned ones still support the overall aims of the group
/r/MensRights09/12/11 11:13 AM
1

Oh yes, definitely if you are threatened with banning, that is censorship, or perhaps ''attempted censorship'' ... when that happens to me I usually continue to speak my opinions until I am banned, because I don't see any point in crushing myself to fit in with an internet community
/r/MensRights09/12/11 10:32 AM
1

But do you see that ultimately it is only the banning which is censorship? there is no amount of verbal harassment which can stop a person from expressing their opinions in a forum if they refuse to stop
/r/MensRights09/12/11 10:23 AM
1

Is it because you see the insulting comments as a threat of potential banning?
/r/MensRights09/12/11 10:07 AM
0

So you are agreeing that the banning is the censorship, not the insulting comments which precede it
/r/MensRights09/12/11 10:00 AM
0

I don't agree at all, having been banned I can tell you that being banned is the ultimate form of censorship, when you are not allowed to speak your opinions ... when I am insulted I do not feel that I am being censored as long as I have the ability to reply to such criticism
/r/MensRights09/12/11 12:43 AM
1

I don't know about this subreddit yet, I only just arrived, but yes I do know what happens when you criticise mods, you stand a chance of being banned, it has happened to me several times, but I think it reflects badly on them rather than me
/r/MensRights09/12/11 12:01 AM
6

People might take your opinions more seriously if you had the courage to stand by them with your regular username ... the trouble with using a sock puppet to criticise others is that the first thing many readers will notice is the lack of courage
/r/MensRights08/12/11 10:01 PM
1

How can a doctor know whether a new baby is male or female if you cannot tell by looking at the body?
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:46 PM
1

So if you support ''anti-MRA'' subreddits because there is some bigotry in MRA, do you also support anti-feminist and anti-trans-rights subreddits because of the bigotry in those?
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:57 AM
1

are you against feminist bigotry and trans bigotry too?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 09:40 PM
1

so you are against equal rights for men?
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:22 PM
1

From that list, only one thread was from this subreddit, and it was affirming that this subreddit is welcoming to trans folks, and the person who spoke in favour of disclosure was heavily downvoted
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:13 AM
1

That would require knowing who are the members of this subreddit and who are the members of the other subreddits ... I need an example from this subreddit to be able to verify your claim that majority opinion here is as you said
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:10 AM
1

I thought there might have been a recent example, found using keywords in the search
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:47 PM
1

Would you be able to point me towards a discussion in this subreddit where the majority agreed on this?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:22 PM
3

Is it really a majority? It seems rather extreme to call it ''rape'' ... I'm not familiar with the culture in this subreddit, just following links around and passing through ... is there a discussion where the majority agreed on this?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:18 PM
2

someone posted this discussion as a link in r/TwoXChromosomes
/r/seduction24/03/10 08:03 PM
1

oh you look nice enough already :) casual style suits you ... loose tops and snug-but-not-tight jeans, sorted
/r/seduction24/03/10 11:26 AM
12

i followed the link from another discussion to this one ... if you are being honest about your intentions then i would say the obvious problem is that you are mistaken when you believe that you have found inner peace ... firstly, if you had found inner peace, you would not have the desire for others to become addicted to you, and secondly, if you had found inner peace, others would naturally find you attractive and want to be around you ... it is your self image which is in error
/r/seduction24/03/10 11:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter