TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

moonsquid-25 Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by moonsquid-25 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

It's my belief that she doesn't directly shame men as overtly as others, is because she doesn't have to. I see no reason to believe that identity politics isn't something that she doesn't believe in. Everyone who believes that sort of rhetoric will almost certainly vote for her, so there's no need for her to speak out on "toxic masculinity." She has plausible deniability. Add in surrogates who do speak openly on the subject, give a nod and wink without having to outright say it. For what it's wo…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:30 PM
173

Van Jones, who's is absolutely on the left side of the political isle, recently stated that Democrats can not be surprised when men don't want to vote for them when tbe narrative of men being toxic is pushed so heavily by their side.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:50 PM
1

Lol, you're unintentionally hilarious. I'm not on a dead bedroom anymore, actually. But thank you for your care and concern . To the original point, regardless of your inability to understand anything beyond a 3rd grade explanation. (Healthy) Relationships are cyclical, not transactional. How that is difficult for you to grasp is beyond me, I suppose. You do nice things for your partner, and the point you're oddly missing is that it goes both ways. No one, man or woman, wants to be the only one …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 01:02 AM
1

Nah, "brosky" lol. Relationships are cyclical. We're in relationships not out of charity. We all have emotional and physical needs, and that's why we have any relationships at all (friendships, romantic relationships, etc). We do things for our partners because we love them and want them to be happy and feel that their needs are being met. We do our best to meet their needs in ways that they feel it the most. Men have emotional and physical needs, just limlke women do. If it's only him that's tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 06:14 PM
2

Your assumption is that it's done for "selfish gain" rather than simply doing something sweet for someone you care about. That assumption is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 05:30 AM
0

In my experience, yes. It's not a huge difference, but it's noticed. I'd also note that simply being LW vs. RW has nothing to do with bigotry. There's literally nothing inherently bigoted with conservative or libertarian political thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 04:09 PM

I never said anything about a prostate. There's more to sexual stimulation than a prostate and cllitoris. Essentially, what you're saying is that every single woman who's said that they find it sexually pleasurable is lying. Here's a little something I copied and pasted after a very simple Google search. Considering you obviously won't put any effort into research, I did it for you. "Simply put, an anal orgasm is a climax achieved by stimulation of high-density nerve spots in the anus. “Orgasms …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 01:20 PM

I enjoy having anal sex with my GF. It's a different sensation, and there's still a bit of a "taboo" aspect to it. Some women enjoy it and can have orgasm through anal sex. Some enjoy the feeling of it if they're also stimulated elsewhere (clit). Some find it -meh- but consent to it because their partner likes it. Some don't enjoy and won't do it. Your overarching statement about how women simply don't like it is way too broad. Some do, some don't. Would I choose anal over vaginal if I could onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:49 PM
2

Very, very accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 01:43 AM
0

Men, in general, don't care about a woman's career in so far as how good of a partner she'll be. Her caring about her job/hobbies/etc is great, but if she has those, it doesn't mean she will be a good partner. That has nothing to do with simply "not caring." It's just not a common criteria men use to base whether or not he wants to pursue anything serious. I suppose the exact same question can be asked back to you regarding women not caring about men outside of what he can provide, or rather, hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 01:40 AM
1

Not really sure where you're getting these ideas, especially with the drinking, etc. If you cheat, then you get what is coming to you and should get shamed for it. I'm a fairly red pilled dude, and I drink occasionally and enjoy some devils lettuce as well. I've done shrooms a few times and ecstasy once. I've not seen too many guys espouse what you're claiming.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:50 PM
0

Yes, without a doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 10:40 PM
1

As a 48 yr old male, I've been physically assaulted by two separate women, and one of those also emotionally abused me. Also, a third woman emotionally abused me but nothing physical. If we'd like to consider cheating as emotional abuse, rack up two more instances.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 11:16 PM

You're seriously wondering why men are hoping for a modicum of respect from their partner? I'd much, much,.much rather be single and self-respecting than to be with someone that feels like a ln entitled, spoiled brat that doesn't need to contribute much at all other than existing. Men have something to offer to the relationship and (gasp!)we know this. Being with some who understands that they actually need to put in some effort is the absolute bare fkng minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 09:40 AM
3

Let's see. It was probably around 2012/2013 after my divorce and dating again.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 01:05 AM
2

I'm a libertarian, conservative man, and broad brushed statements like that simply aren't true. What OP is referring to is the "tradcon" movement from both men and women. It has actually nothing to do with conservative politics and philosophy but is more of a social expectation that's being brought back from several decades ago, claiming traditional gender roles should be brought back. I wholeheartedly disagree with the Tradcon movement and agree with OP about how they're not necessarily in men'…
/r/MensRights13/03/24 05:46 PM
2

Not even close to accurate.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 04:17 AM
1

You're speaking anecdotally as am I, the difference however is that I'm not speaking on behalf of men in general. I really, really dislike "hook up culture" and the damage it causes to society at large and if I wanted to, I could easily get casual sex. Not to come across any particular way, but I'm a good looking guy, in great shape, well spoken and work in a field that highlights particular traits that women typically find impressive. I've been approached, asked out, flirted with etc. That bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:18 AM
1

Men will sleep with slutty women, obviously. Men will have a relationship and marry those who aren't, as a general rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 11:19 PM
2

Virtually never. I'm 47 and have had several committed relationships and not once was I with someone that doted on or spoiled me. There's been a select few that would do nice things for me (back rub, oral sex, plan a date) if I asked, but only when I asked. I could probably count the number of times on one hand that it wasn't due to me asking for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 03:27 AM
1

The societal consequences of this are only starting to manifest and they're not good.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 11:22 PM
1

This is arguably one of the most backwards takes I've ever read, especially using Tinder in the argument. Women overwhelmingly have an inflated sense of attractiveness when using apps such as tinder. Men will routinely sleep with a woman that is well below his attraction "level" (for lack of a better word) simply because all he's looking for is sex. These situations happen regularly and as such, it gives the woman an inflated perception of her appearance when in actuality, the man is just casual…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 10:21 PM
3

Whoops, there you go citing a study that basically everyone already knows is a general fact. How this is controversial is beyond me. Men tend to prefer youth, beauty, feminity and don't often consider wealth, status or education. Women generally prefer provisions (money by today's standards), status, masculinity, stability etc. Norwegians are taller than Indonesians. Simply pointing to an Indonesian man that happens to be taller than the average Norwegian man and then claiming that the rule is n…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 04:07 AM
1

Will a man be with a beautiful woman even if she's not necessarily the sweetest, most giving partner? Uh, yes obviously. Will women stay with a man that isn't necessarily the sweetest, most giving partner but provides a very good standard of living and treats them to luxury items? Once again, the answer is an obvious yes. To say that these things don't happen is an absolute, utter willful blindness to very common behavior. You're simply being a "team player" and ignoring common traits that may p…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 08:17 PM
2

I'd say that you're an outlier. It's coming from my experience and that of many other men. Granted it's anecdotal, but it's definitely common enough for it to be stereotyped to the point of common assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 05:49 PM
12

Desirable in the sense that he has something they want (ex. Resources) and want what he can do/provide for them. A good looking, decent man that makes 35k/year vs an average looking man that's kinda a dick but makes 100k+/year, the wealthy man will usually be much more successful in the dating world than the other. The only positive difference is the money. The other example has many more positive traits yet will routinely lose out to the high earner. It's very clear where the priorities are. De…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 05:46 PM
56

I think that concept is primarily driven by wealth accumulated. Men in their mid 30's and beyond are typically set in their careers and starting to make good money. It's no secret that older men are more wealthy (generally speaking) than guys in the twenties and considering how women view wealthy men, they're more desirable. Like it, hate it, it doesn't matter. Women will be with a man because of his wealth and nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 05:25 PM
10

The no filming or photos rule applies to the locker rooms and bathrooms. Filming exercises and movements on the workout floor is a common practice. I do periodically for form corrections etc.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:32 PM
38

Me personally, yeah I have. And what makes this harder is that I'm a trainer at a major gym chain, so it's my job to be proactive in approaching members. When I workout there during my breaks, I'm not in uniform yet I'm routinely looking at members form during more complicated lifts or seeing if there's any little nuances I can point out to make whatever it is they're doing more effective. Luckily, I've been there long enough to where most members know me or at least recognize me. It's the new o…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 04:07 AM
13

Cassie is fantastic and the documentary is very good.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 12:07 AM
15

There was a fair amount of jargon in your post, but if you're stating that women on a basic level don't understand men or rather, don't care to understand men when it comes to relationships, I'd mostly agree. Men are essentially beat over the head since puberty about how to treat women, how to make them happy, how to cater to etc. It's literally everywhere from sitcoms/movies to magazines at check out counters to social media and beyond. Women frankly aren't really taught about what men value an…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:35 AM
7

The men I'm referring to will be happy to be in a relationship. Some men don't care, most do. Of those that do, there's a percentage that won't be able to set boundaries or hold any expectations. My belief is that it most certainly matters, but the context of their past matters as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 02:12 AM
24

There's always going to be a supply of thirsty men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 12:52 AM
1

Yes, quite so.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 02:22 AM
4

I dunno man, I'm a pretty red pill kinda guy but I can't agree with you on this one. It's not that I think women have more "pure" dating habits mind you, it's just that I don't necessarily think they're worse. It's more of a modern day social contagion where most everyone has shitty dating morals. My wife has been hit on numerous times while the guy knew full well she was in a relationship and no, she didn't lead them on. I know that's anecdotal, but I've seen it more than in my own particular i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:31 AM
5

Welp, you're not wrong. What else is new?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 04:03 AM
3

Gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:09 PM
5

Um, wtf are you on about? I actually don't have to give you a damn thing. You're frankly not worth my or anyone else's time. Also, who TF mentioned anything about free speach? Lol, how about I go onto some sub that you'd enjoy being on and spew a boat load of sexism and see how long it takes for me to get banned? Talking about double standards, that's rich. Your whole modern "feminist" movement relishes double standards tbh. Also, I can admit to being wrong. I've been wrong before and will inevi…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:56 AM
2

Same, reported it
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:46 AM
10

Ugh, this trope. You're boring and mentally lazy. Why even bother coming onto this sub and spewing this silly nonsense? It's not like you're going to get literally any men to come to the same opinion you have. Like you're expecting men to be "ahhhh get it now! Thank you for this clear, concise and on point message about how we're actually all so very awful!". Your arrogance is beyond recognition. Levitating must be easy for you and that halo over your head. If you believe your opinion to be this…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:43 AM
8

Ugh, hyperbolic much? The "manosphere" or whatever it's being called now is a lot, lot deeper than simply incels. Using a simplistic take on it the way you seem to (I could be wrong?) is a strawman tactic. It dismisses very real issues that men face in order to keep the common narrative that clearly favors women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 06:23 PM
16

I'm in the "manosphere" or rather I'm pretty red pilled. That being said, you're correct. There's definitely some grifters here and they prey on a particular type of guy. It's typically the "Alpha male" type of guy, or at least attempting to come across as one that's the fraud. Usually in the PUA game or similar. The thing about the manosphere is it's too broad of a name and there's some prominent subsects under the umbrella term "manosphere". No one, man or woman will tell me what a "real man" …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 06:22 PM
35

I don't think they hate it because it makes men happy. I think they hate it because it takes some spotlight off of them. IMO, here in the western world, womens issues are strongly considered and catered to. They've also been told over and over again (wrongly) that mens lives are so much easier, so many privelages, so much power etc. Victim narratives are seductive and give an unearned sense of moral superiority. If some of your victim status is questioned, it can be seen as being attacked, as if…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 04:07 PM
1

46 man here, pretty red pilled and I don't think there's any rule that stipulates who should say it first. I said it first to my fiance because I felt like saying it. I don't tend to overthink these sorts of things. If I feel it, I say it and it's as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:31 AM
1

Cool beans, thanks for the heads up. I'm a pretty red pulled dude that enjoys debate. I'll probably have fun here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:41 AM
1

I'm pretty new to the purple pill page here on reddit and a bit surprised by what you're saying. Isn't the purple pill supposed to be a bit of a middle ground between red and blue pill thinking? I know any mention of RP thought gets everyone in a huff, so maybe I'm not all that surprised after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:08 AM
1

I gotcha. You were being rhetorical and saying that he'll be called misogynist for his post. If that's the case, then I probably agree with your take.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 01:04 AM
15

I was explaining why men believe modern woman often have standards that far outpace what they themselves bring to the table, often by a large amount. Me personally, I've seen it first hand and have seen several examples of it on different forms of media, so it definitely exists. To what level it is, is debatable of course. If these unrealistic women would rather be single for most if not all of their life, that's their prerogative. There's no sweat off my eggs, I'm happily engaged to a lovely wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:58 PM
49

I'm not sure who or what exactly you're referring to, but I think when men say that, they're referring to how modern women are perceived (I believe to be mostly true) to have a laundry list of high level requirements while themselves coming no where near the level of what they're demanding in a partner. Often times, these requirements, for lack of a better word, eliminate a large percentage of eligible men. Similar to old belief that 80% of women are going after the top 20% of men. An example wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:45 PM
12

Obviously I can't speak on behalf of all men, but for me personally, no I don't find women "beneath me" creepy if they were to do the exact same thing an attractive woman may do. If your point is that people want to find an attractive partner, than sure but that's not what this post is about. Perhaps the reason why it wouldn't be creepy is because the vast, vast majority of men aren't gettiing approached very often, and many men not at all. Perhaps due to female hypergamy or evolutionary necessi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 05:10 AM
27

I've asked my GF this specifically, whether or not it's creepy or flattering based on attractiveness. She's admitted that it has a lot to do wit whether or not the guy is good looking. Of course there's limits, but by in large, from when she was younger, it was creepy if he wasn't good looking and not so much if he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 03:05 AM
66

That's one of the more egregious bans I've seen, it's ridiculous. I've been banned from subs for similarly absurd reasons. That's why I subscribed to a few subs that call out asshat mods like those, ones that apply their own opinions and ban simply out of pettiness and their agenda. It's very frustrating. Yours is the worst I've seen though. Edit : subscribed to r/offmychest for shits and giggles, low and behold I was banned. Literally no notice, no message. Just tried to comment to see what wou…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 02:03 PM
9

And she'd be required to do so considering she made the unilateral decision to have the child without considering his choice in the least. He doesn't want the child yet is required to pay. She doesn't want the child and he has no say. That's not equality. Your scenario gives her all the agency, yet she has no agency at all...almost as if no one here knows how pregnancies happen. She responsible enough to make a decision w/out his opinion, she's responsible enough to have the responsibility for t…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:40 AM
6

If she wants the and he doesn't, does he have the obligation to pay?
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:03 AM
11

That's not the point I was making. The point is, she alone can decide to abort whether he wants the kid or not. She alone can decide to have the kid whether he wants it or not. If he wants the child, yet she chooses to abort, he's out of any say. If she wants the child and he does not, he doesn't have any say. That is the exact opposite of fairness.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 03:20 AM
24

I think it's a little too broad of a question for anyone to answer on behalf of all MRA's. My opinion however is that if a woman has 100% autonomy to make that decision unilaterally, then the man should be able to have the decision to not pay. That's not where my opinion falls regarding abortion, but it's logically where that road goes. If she can determine w/out his consideration (my body, my choice), then the equal thing would be for him to determine what is done with his money. Considering of…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 01:09 AM
12

I wouldn't sweat it my man, remember that we're on reddit. I mean hell, I was given more than a few down votes simply for saying that I wouldn't date a woman that's had a gang bang. I'm not shitting you, someone posted a thread asking if you'd date a woman that had a gang bang, I responded "no, I would not..." and was immediately down voted 3 or 4 times for that. Then I remembered that this is reddit.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 02:47 AM
4

Not sure what you're referring to. Did someone insult you for being on a men's rights sub?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:46 PM
0

I can admit that the law is a strange way to go about passing legislation, deputizing citizens and all. The libertarian perspective of not wanting government to "force religion" etc doesn't apply to this however. Or at least you're mischaracterizing the prolife argument. Based on what you've said, the government shouldn't have any right to stop people from murdering others, considering the prolife perspective. One of Governments few jobs is to insure the safety of its citizens. Prolifers believe…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 03:12 PM
2

And that's my original point. Some would claim with just as much certainty as you, the 1.5 months is sufficient and reasonable, plus I'm sure they'd have some scientific data to prove their point, just as I'm sure you could also. It's reasonable and unreasonable dependant on who's talking about it, meaning it's subjective.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:00 PM
1

That's not how getting evicted works. You're due a sufficient amount of time (not sure how long exactly, varies state to state). I live in an apartment and regardless of what the landlord wants, they can't just walk up to my door and come in, let alone kick me out.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:53 PM
1

I think the term "artificially" would probably be argued against from the prolife community, considering it's their view that life is already sacred and that life begins at conception, thus due protection from "murder". I think that they'd also say the opposite side of the coin, that abortion artificially devalues human life.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:49 PM
4

And some would state the any abortion is unreasonable, especially so if there's a heartbeat detected. Your opinion is what it is and you're clearly not in favor of this law. Prolifers will disagree with you and want abortion outlawed full stop. You'd claim they're not reasonable just as quickly as they'd claim you are not. My point stands. You are not the arbiter of what is or is not reasonable in cases like this. If someone is claiming that 2+2=5, that's an objective falsehood, you can easily p…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:45 PM
4

If you're prolife, I suppose it's either reasonable or you'd like an even a shorter period of time. If you're prochoice, it's most likely not reasonable. If you're more extreme with the prochoice argument, you'd be in favor of no legal limits at all (legal all the way up until birth). Reasonable and unreasonable is a subjective term in this case.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:13 PM
21

I am and my GF appreciates my view on things, most of the time she's even in agreement. All my previous LTR's have had the exact opposite feelings and hated anything to do with advocating for men.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter